electric_cars_project/speeches.csv

"_key";"name";"party";"text";"llm summary";"Adoption Hindered by Rural Areas";"Economic Impact and Job Losses";"Environmental Benefits of EVs";"High Upfront Costs";"Insufficient Infrastructure";"Support for Sustainable Transportation";"Need for Electricity Supply";"Environmental Concerns During Production";"Problematic Resource Extraction";"Lower Operating Costs";"Technological Advancements";"Environmental Impact of Electricity Source";"Dependency on Foreign Resources";"Support from Government and Incentives";"Employment Opportunities";"Lack of Affordability and Accessibility";"Resource Recycling and Waste Management"
"2021-01-19_3-18";"Ismail Ertug";"S&D";" – Mr President, the upcoming revision of the TEN-T guidelines is of crucial importance for the decarbonisation – the successful decarbonisation – of the transport sector, and the way towards this goal is electrification. For example, in 2020 we saw a massive surge in sales of electric vehicles. In the third quarter of 2020, almost 10% of all newly-sold passenger cars had a plug, and this number more than tripled compared to the third quarter of 2019. However, to stay on track we need more infrastructure, which, I have to say, we would already have, had not the Member States undermined the ambitious Commission proposal back in 2014. 
What we have to avoid is another west-east division. Special attention must be paid to heavy duty transport. Here we need a functioning network of mega-chargers and hydrogen-fuelling stations along the TEN-T network."};"According to the speech, here's what is mentioned about electric vehicles:

* In 2020, there was a massive surge in sales of electric vehicles.
* In the third quarter of 2020, almost 10% of all newly-sold passenger cars had a plug (i.e., were electric vehicles).
* This number more than tripled compared to the third quarter of 2019.

That's the extent of the information provided about electric vehicles in the text."};0;0;1;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2021-02-08_15-7";"Ciarán Cuffe";"NA";"rapporteur for the opinion of the Committee on Transport and Tourism. – Mr President, there’s only one planet Earth and that’s why we’re here today to make laws that help the planet heal. It won’t be easy. 
It’s 50 years since the singer, Marvin Gaye, asked ‘Where did all the blue skies go?’ and the question is more relevant today. We need a new relationship with our Earth and we must all play our part in realising the circular economy.
On the Transport and Tourism Committee, we know the days of the internal combustion engine are numbered. We need to go electric, but a million electric cars won’t save the planet. We need to slow down, hear the birdsong and smell the flowers. We need to walk and cycle more and invest in public transport: modern trams and buses, shared and active mobility. The Ecodesign Directive must help us to achieve this. 
As aviation picks up again, let’s have fairer fares that encourage rail travel. Where we need to do this is in this European Year of Rail. We also need to adopt Europe’s eco label and eco-management and audit scheme to tackle waste. The planet deserves this. "};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned related to electric vehicles:

1. ""On the Transport and Tourism Committee, we know the days of the internal combustion engine are numbered.""
	* This implies that the speaker believes that traditional gasoline-powered engines will eventually become obsolete.
2. ""We need to go electric""
	* The speaker suggests that a transition to electric vehicles is necessary for the future of transportation.

That's all the information mentioned about electric vehicles in the text."};0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2021-03-08_22-8";"Maria Arena";"S&D";" On behalf of the S&D Group. – Madam President, living in globalization means that we are fortunate to be able to share knowledge, cultures, and consume products that we would never have consumed without globalization. But it also means that we are interdependent and that our behavior here has repercussions elsewhere. 
    The hyperglobalization we have been involved in over the past few decades also means the emergence of damaging economic, social, and environmental disruptions for everyone. It has allowed companies to relocate to countries with lower social, fiscal, or environmental standards, leaving behind thousands of protected workers and exploiting workers who receive no protection. Owning a smartphone, a computer, or even an electric car also means the overexploitation of mining in Africa at the expense of the population, as these rare metals are often not paid their fair price.  These examples show that the globalization we praise, which benefits us, also needs to be regulated. Just as we have done with the regulation on conflict minerals exploitation, by having a binding mechanism requiring corporate responsibility, we want the same thing for all sectors of activity. We want products consumed in Europe to be free from child labor, forced labor, and deforestation."};"According to the speech, owning an electric car means that rare metals used in its production are often not paid their fair price, resulting in the overexploitation of mining in Africa at the expense of the local population. This is mentioned as one example of how globalization can have negative consequences, such as exploiting workers and harming the environment."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2021-03-24_22-4";"Carlo Fidanza";"NA";"
    Speaker for the opinion of the Committee on Transport and Tourism. - Madam President, honorable colleagues, Mr. Commissioner, the opinion of the TRAN Committee has chosen to prioritize pragmatism over ideology once because, you see, the air pollution we breathe is certainly a huge problem but, in front of dozens of infringement procedures that have not led to any results - as mentioned by the speaker - it does not make sense to insist on the same path, increasing even more the reduction targets of emissions already difficult to achieve in this context.
    It is wrong, then, to beat businesses already burdened by taxes and bureaucracy and it is wrong to punish citizens who, for many reasons, cannot go to work by bicycle or scooter and cannot afford to buy expensive electric cars for which, in many parts of Europe, there are no charging stations.
    You see, I live in the plain of the Po Valley, where unfortunately our beautiful Alps make natural renewal difficult in the area. In such territories this is our opinion: we do not need ideological recipes but modern infrastructure, efficient public transport, replacement of the circulating fleet and incentives for the ecological transition of businesses. Only in this way will we really contribute to having cleaner air."};"According to the speech, it is mentioned that:

* ""expensive electric cars"" are mentioned as an option for some citizens who cannot afford them.
* It is stated that ""in many parts of Europe, there are no charging stations"" for these electric cars.

In summary, the speaker mentions electric vehicles as a potential option for some citizens, but notes that they may not be accessible due to their high cost and lack of charging infrastructure in certain areas."};0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;
"2021-03-24_24-3";"Vlad Gheorghe";"Renew";" – Madam President, annual pollution leads to the loss of 450,000 lives in the European Union, costing us billions of euros for medical care. Enough! It is clear that we must improve the implementation of air quality directives.
    From a transport perspective, I have proposed in this report three solutions for reducing pollution. Firstly, to update air quality standards, which are 15 years old and far below World Health Organization recommendations. We always say that the European Union is a leader in the fight for a clean environment. Let's prove it!
    Secondly, to rethink cooperation between the Commission and national, regional, and local authorities. The implementation gap is alarming: there are no standardized monitoring systems, and underreporting is systematic. There is also a lack of an air pollution sensor network. Authorities need European funding and expertise, and the Commission must intervene.
    And thirdly: urban mobility plans. The European Union must help cities have sustainable public transport, safe infrastructure for cycling, electric charging stations, and reduce the share of second-hand cars."};"According to the speech, it is mentioned that ""electric charging stations"" are one of the solutions proposed for reducing pollution in urban mobility plans. This means that the speaker suggests that the European Union should help cities have electric charging stations as part of their sustainable public transport infrastructure."};0;0;1;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2021-03-24_24-5";"Pär Holmgren";"Greens/EFA";"
    Madam President, as several speakers have mentioned before me, there are nearly 400,000 people who die prematurely each year due to air pollution. We can compare it to almost half of those who died this year during the coronavirus pandemic - to put it into perspective. It simply cannot be ignored that environmental issues and health issues are very closely linked. We must start addressing these issues now with the seriousness they deserve, purely to introduce stricter regulations and thus save lives.
    We must tighten the maximum limits for pollution that exist at EU level, and of course, they should be in line with WTO rules. That goes without saying! If a country cannot guarantee this and does not comply, it must also cost. We must be able to impose swift, tough fines on EU governments that, in fact, do not take their citizens' health seriously enough.
    The most polluting cars must clearly be removed from our streets as soon as possible. In the long term, we must also have completely car-free zones. We must ensure it becomes easier for people to get to their jobs with a bicycle, train, and public transport.
    It is simply time now to seriously speed up the transition to renewable energy and sustainable transportation means. Anything else is to put our fellow human beings' health and lives at risk."};"The text does not explicitly mention electric vehicles, but it does mention ""completely car-free zones"" and ""sustainable transportation means"". This implies that the speaker is advocating for a reduction in the use of traditional fossil fuel-based cars and promoting alternative modes of transportation.

In particular, the text suggests that the most polluting cars should be removed from streets as soon as possible, which could include older gasoline-powered vehicles. The goal is to make it easier for people to get to their jobs using bicycles, trains, and public transport, rather than relying on personal cars.

While electric vehicles are not specifically mentioned, they could potentially be included in the category of ""sustainable transportation means"" that the speaker is advocating for. However, without further information or context, it cannot be definitively stated whether electric vehicles are being referred to or not."};0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2021-04-27_8-3";"Petri Sarvamaa";"NA";" rapporteur. – Madam President, first of all, I would like to thank the Court of Auditors, the Secretary-General, directorates-general, the internal auditor, the Authority, my colleagues and Parliament’s staff, including the Secretariat and our offices, for their valuable work during this discharge procedure.
Trust between citizens and institutions is based on the responsible and lawful use of public funds. I am therefore pleased to say that, with regard to Parliament’s administrative expenditure, the level of error was below the materiality threshold in 2019.
EU money is public money, and Parliament’s budget represents almost one fifth of the total administrative expenditure of all the EU institutions. All EU spending must be based on simple and clear rules. However, this is, unfortunately, not currently the case when looking at the errors found by the Court concerning the contributions received by one political party at European level.
It is inappropriate for a political party at European level to be unable to present written agreements or receipts for expenditure paid with taxpayers’ money. The Court should not have to make the same recommendation from year to year.
The year 2019 was affected by a staff reduction target, which required Parliament to eliminate 59 posts from its administration. In the report, we warn of the negative effects of these cuts and point out the increased workload and responsibility of certain committees. We must ensure that Parliament continues to have sufficient resources in the future, and that our working conditions are appealing in order to bring top talent in-house from every corner of Europe. The staffing situation and staff workload should be reassessed.
We should also look carefully at the current recruitment practices. The EPSO competition is not adapted well to Parliament’s current needs, and we call for a new selection framework to be developed for specialist competitions. At the same time, we should pay attention to geographical and gender balance.
One of the most pressing issues in the report is the voluntary pension fund. On the one hand, we must recognise and respect the legal basis of the commitments that Parliament has made to its Members. These rights are stated directly in the Statute of Members, Article 27, and there is no running away from them.
But on the other hand, I am extremely worried about the situation, and we need to find a solution that is fair to all sides. At the moment, we have to be patient and wait for the European Court of Justice’s ruling. After the ruling, we can reassess the situation and explore all possible legal options in order to limit and avoid using taxpayer money to cover the deficit.
The report raises issues across different areas of Parliament’s operations. We need to note the increasing importance of cybersecurity and learn from the good practices developed during the election campaign. We can also be happy about the highest-recorded voter turnout in 20 years, and I think we should continue to engage citizens actively and use all our communication channels through the entire term and not only a brief period before the elections.
In the report, we paid close attention to the sustainability aspect of Parliament’s operations. Although officially carbon-neutral since 2016, there is still more to be done. We can keep improving by making a gradual shift to zero-emission vehicles, reducing our paper consumption and by improving the energy efficiency of our buildings.
The pandemic has brought a lot of changes to the way Parliament operates, and many innovative solutions have been developed quickly to accommodate the situation. It is imperative for Parliament to keep innovating and developing a variety of technological solutions to improve its functioning. With smart solutions and automated systems, we can release resources into other activities, increase efficiency and reduce the amount of human errors.
Normally, we would hold 12 plenary sessions a year in Strasbourg, but the exceptional circumstances have forced us to keep the sessions in Brussels instead. Despite my call for further automation and our technological preparedness to be developed, I also call for us to get back to normal as soon as possible. And in the report, I really want to highlight the temporary nature of the current situation.
There is always scope for improvement, and the discharge procedure gave us a tool to effectively monitor the way taxpayer money is being used. As the rapporteur, I recommend granting discharge to Parliament for the year 2019."};"The text mentions electric vehicles in the following sentence:

""In the report, we paid close attention to the sustainability aspect of Parliament's operations. Although officially carbon-neutral since 2016, there is still more to be done. We can keep improving by making a gradual shift to zero-emission vehicles...""

This sentence indicates that the report recommends reducing emissions and increasing the use of electric or zero-emission vehicles in Parliament's operations."};0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2021-04-28_20-22";"Kim Van Sparrentak";"Greens/EFA";" – Madam President, with the agreement on rail passenger rights that is on the table, the full potential of trains for achieving the Green Deal is not tapped into. With a more reliable and comfortable rail service, we could convince many more people to take the train, but this deal will please the rail operators and leave passengers out in the cold. 
With this deal, two centimetres of snow can be enough for train passengers not to get compensation. It will still be nearly impossible to book an international trip on one ticket and, if you travel on a regional train, like most commuters, for another five years you might not be eligible for compensation when delayed. Persons with disabilities or reduced mobility won’t be able to participate in society equally, because they still have to book assistance 24 hours in advance, even at big stations.
This deal is not in line with what is necessary to promote sustainable transport, and that is why I call on all colleagues to support the amendments proposed by the Greens, reject this deal and reopen negotiations. Passengers and the planet count on you. "};"There is no mention of electric vehicles in the provided speech. The text only discusses rail passenger rights, trains, and sustainable transport, but does not mention electric vehicles at all. Therefore, there is nothing to summarize or report about electric vehicles in this text."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2021-05-17_14-10";"Paolo Borchia";"ID";"
    On behalf of the ID group - Madam President, Madam Commissioner, esteemed colleagues, this is another wasted opportunity. Climate leadership is not won with chatter or documents far from reality, and after years spent daydreaming about a top-class European Union on climate change, we are heading towards perfect suicide, handing over the future of energy technologies to China.
    Pay attention to the market shares held globally by China: lithium refining capacity: 90%, lithium and batteries: 70%, solar: 70% as well, electric cars: - listen, listen - 60%. So one thing is having a plurality of supplier countries available, another thing is instead getting stuck in a blind alley and relying on a monopolist.
    With a difference: China does not accept that tables of march on decarbonization are imposed. In fact, Beijing has set climate neutrality for 2060, having the technology available, and Brussels for 2050, without technology. It is curious, or it would be comical, if not the world of industry or small and medium-sized European businesses had to pay for it.
    In relation to hydrogen, green hydrogen certainly is an opportunity, a shared objective but at the moment it is not a ready technology. My group has submitted amendments to give a role to hydrogen produced with other low-carbon technologies, amendments rejected. I wonder: but what should countries that do not have a sufficient quota of renewables do?
    Therefore, it is not enough to issue regulations and directives, terms like ""ecological transition"" or ""resilience"". Yes, by doing so one follows the fashion, but certainly not the environmental and energy challenges are won and, above all, the problems of those who work are not solved."};"According to the speech, China has a significant market share in electric cars, with 60% globally. This is mentioned as an example of how China dominates certain energy technologies, including lithium refining capacity (90%), lithium and batteries (70%), solar power (70%), and electric cars (60%). The speaker uses this information to argue that the European Union should not rely solely on Chinese suppliers for these technologies, but rather aim to have a plurality of supplier countries available."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;
"2021-05-17_14-14";"Andor Deli";"NI";" – Madam President, it is essential that the European Commission puts greater emphasis and financial support to hydrogen as an excellent zero-emissions alternative to traditional fuels. I think it’s very unfortunate that when it comes to infrastructure and filling stations, the EU is way behind in comparison to other developed parts of the world.
The Joint Undertaking for Fuel Cells and Hydrogen and its further support is crucial but they can’t do it alone. Despite the fact that technical neutrality is the official policy, if you look back, the Commission was way more open and supportive when it comes to battery technology and electric vehicles. 
I think the time has come that hydrogen gets a similar boost from the Commission in order to create a solid basis for the future European hydrogen market. Electric vehicles have already planted their foot firmly, now it’s time that hydrogen and fuel cells do the same. I cannot imagine that the green transition can be achieved, especially in freight and long-haul transport, without hydrogen and fuel cells. "};"According to the speech, it is mentioned that:

* The European Commission was more open and supportive of battery technology and electric vehicles in the past.
* Electric vehicles have already ""planted their foot firmly"", implying that they have made significant progress.

In summary, the speaker is pointing out that the EU has been more supportive of electric vehicles in the past, and that they have already achieved some success."};0;0;0;0;1;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;
"2021-05-17_22-16";"Anna Júlia Donáth";"Renew";" – Mr. President! Those who live in poverty cause less harm to the planet than those who seek happiness through overconsumption, traveling by private cars and vacationing on luxury yachts. In the short term, it is not the rich who pay for climate change, but rather those who can do the least about it: the impoverished sections of developed countries and the populations of developing countries. But it's not just overconsumption, environmental protection has become an elite privilege in today's world: organic food, electric cars, solar panels on roofs. These are things that an average person cannot afford while many consider clean drinking water a luxury. Dear colleagues! We cannot expect the masses to be environmentally conscious and bear the consequences of climate change while the elites refuse to work together for a common goal, saving our future. That is why we need to completely rethink the social equality and redistribution systems. We must build an Europe that is both fair and green at the same time."};"According to the speech, electric cars are mentioned as one of the ""things"" that are considered an elite privilege in today's world. This means that they are something that only a select few can afford, implying that they are not accessible or affordable for the average person. The speaker is highlighting the disparity between those who have access to these luxury items and those who do not, using electric cars as an example of how environmental protection has become exclusive to certain groups."};0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;
"2021-05-18_3-18";"Tom Berendsen";"EPP";" – Chairman, Commissioner, if there is one thing we learn from this crisis, it is that as the European Union, we are too dependent on other parts of the world, not only for medicines and medical supplies, but also for the things we need for our future economy. I am talking about computer chips. I am talking about batteries for electric cars. And it is good that the European Commission is going to try to reduce this dependence with this strategy. And I also think it is the responsibility of politicians to ensure that we become less dependent on others.
    But in addition to producing more cleverly in the European Union, we must also make sure that what we produce and what we invent in the European Union is better protected: against unfair competition from Chinese state-owned enterprises, against unwanted takeovers in strategic sectors or of our knowledge and technology. And the foreign investment package presented is a good first step, but it can be better, and there we will also submit a number of proposals.
    I would like to conclude with an appeal to the European Commission: in addition to this industrial strategy, also come up with an action plan for mutual dependence. How do we ensure that when we invest in research and innovation, other parts of the world remain dependent on us? Because that also affects the balance of power."};"According to the speech, something related to electric vehicles is mentioned as follows:

* The speaker mentions ""batteries for electric cars"" as one of the things that the European Union is dependent on from other parts of the world.
* This dependence is seen as a problem and the speaker suggests that the European Commission's strategy should aim to reduce this dependence.

That's all the information about electric vehicles mentioned in the text."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;
"2021-05-18_3-29";"Zbigniew Kuźmiuk";"ECR";"
    Madam President, Madam Commissioner! A strong point of these new analyses by the Commission and the conclusions drawn from the covid crisis is the identification of the dependencies of the European economy on its external environment and pointing out the sectors necessary for achieving our strategic goals. In a positive context, it should be noted that the following areas have been indicated: raw materials industry, including materials for electric mobility development, active pharmaceutical ingredients, hydrogen, semiconductors or cloud computing. In my opinion, it is necessary to prepare a comprehensive analysis of the post-covid economy and in this context assess the feasibility and pace of implementing dual climate and digital transformation. We cannot pretend that nothing has happened. As Commissioner said, there was a huge negative impact of covid on the economy. We cannot continue at the same pace as before. And finally, it is very good that the Commission emphasizes the positive benefits obtained from the single, unified market. Unfortunately, it accepts solutions that undermine the competitiveness of services provided by companies from Central and Eastern Europe. From this path, Madam Commissioner, we need to turn back."};"According to the speech, it is mentioned that ""materials for electric mobility development"" are one of the areas identified as necessary for achieving strategic goals. This implies that the speaker is referring to the production or manufacturing of components or parts used in electric vehicles, such as batteries, motors, or charging systems.

The text does not provide further details about electric vehicles themselves, but rather focuses on the importance of developing materials and technologies related to electric mobility."};0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;
"2021-05-19_18-2";"Christian Doleschal";"NA";"
    Reporter. - Mr. President, dear Commissioner, dear colleagues! What do we aim to achieve with the revision of the Aarhus Regulation? Our priorities may differ in detail, but there is one point on which we agree: we want conformity with the Treaty. We want to ensure that the European Union has sufficient access to justice in environmental matters. We want the European Union to fulfill its obligations under the international Aarhus Convention, and this will be achieved with this report.
    
    The report brings significant innovations and successes. At the same time, respect for EU treaties and the distribution of competences within the European Union is maintained. National administrative acts remain completely excluded from the scope of application of the Aarhus Regulation. The process will become more transparent. There will be a new right to be heard for companies and authorities affected by the procedure. There will be a new register for all applications submitted. Procedure costs must not be prohibitive.
    
    As you know, the Aarhus Regulation regulates the review of Union administrative acts in environmental matters. The scope of this review procedure is now being expanded, as required by the international Compliance Committee. But with due regard for legal certainty.
    
    However, in all its importance, we find ourselves in a field of tension between different objectives. The Green Deal must be implemented, and quickly. Therefore, we must not let bureaucracy lay stones in the way of often sustainable projects. An increase in administrative review methods does not always mean an increase in environmentally friendly projects. The best example are state aids: The Compliance Committee wants decisions by a Commission on state aids to be challengeable due to possible violations of environmental law. State aids, however, are not the enemy of a sensible environmental policy. On the contrary: State aids make a valuable contribution to the implementation of the Green Deal. The Commission approves annual state aids for the construction of charging columns, for electric vehicles. It approves subsidies for battery-powered electric and hybrid buses and for plants that generate electricity from renewable energies. It approves subsidies for the construction of energy-efficient heating power plants that use waste as fuel. And the list goes on.
    
    But not only for the Green Deal are state aids essential. State aids support society in times of a pandemic. State aids have saved numerous family businesses, local economic stakeholders and their employees from financial ruin. That is why I tell you: Additional, increasingly complex review measures for state aids are not always a great help in the European Union. We have to be careful. An excess of bureaucratic reviews and formalities can delay or even prevent sustainable projects. 
    Therefore, we cannot grant the same review rights to all Union citizens. For this reason, I am pleased that we have found a meaningful and practical restriction of eligible applicants. According to our report, only Union citizens who are directly affected by an administrative act can request a review. Such direct involvement could be, for example, a particular health impairment resulting from a violation of environmental law. State aid and other projects are thus protected against organized campaigns that can paralyze the system. Only those can submit an application for review who actually experience the effects of the administrative act. For this, we ensure swift and legally secure planning and approval procedures.
    
    At this point, I would like to thank all those involved that we have found a compromise together, a compromise between the right to access justice and also a compromise on access to legal certainty."};"According to the speech, the European Commission approves annual state aids for the construction of charging columns for electric vehicles. This is mentioned as an example of how state aids contribute to the implementation of the Green Deal, which aims to promote environmentally friendly projects."};0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2021-06-08_7-3";"Ursula von der Leyen";"NA";" Madam President of the Commission. - Dear Mr. President, Ladies and Gentlemen deputies, it is good to be back in Strasbourg. The last plenary session we had in this hemicycle was in February 2020, over a year ago. And since then, the world has changed!
    We couldn't have imagined then that a global pandemic would bring our economies to a standstill, heavily burden our societies, and upend our way of life. This pandemic has cost our societies and economies dearly, there is no doubt about it, but it has also mobilized us. It has put us to the test of conceiving and implementing extraordinary solutions. With the strong support of this Parliament and our Member States, we have launched unprecedented financial assistance measures and did so at record speed.
    Next Generation EU gives our Union the power to invest hundreds of billions in a common recovery that we desperately need and to invest in our shared priorities. With Next Generation EU, we are transforming our continent for the decades to come. We digitalize our economies, make the European Green Pact a reality, and make our societies stronger and more resilient. Our plan is worth 750 billion euros. It is the largest stimulus plan ever deployed in Europe since the Marshall Plan. It is the relaunch that Europe needs today and for the future.
    Honorable Members, we succeeded because we realized in this fundamental global crisis that we should not tear ourselves apart in the old patterns. We did not divide into Northern Europeans, Southern Europeans, Central and Eastern Europeans, 'frugals', 'friends of cohesion'. No. This time we agreed that there is only one goal that matters, and that is to fight this pandemic as a European Union. Already next week, the Commission will start approving, indeed, the national plans for Council adoption.
    This is a landmark achievement. From agreeing on Next Generation EU at our four-day summit last July to the approval of the first plans, it took us less than a year.
    Today I want to thank everyone who made that possible. The European Parliament, for your support for Next Generation EU and for the Recovery and Resilience Facility. All 27 Member States for the huge amount of work they have put into their plans, and also more than 300 colleagues at the European Commission who are working on these plans day and night, together with their national counterparts and together with you in the European Parliament.
    So after less than a year we are there. Our recovery is about to begin. The plans show the way the money will start flowing in the coming weeks. Up to now, we have indeed received 23 national plans.
    These plans send a very clear message. Europeans are ready for a new start. Our citizens are ready to embrace a more sustainable, a more digital and a more resilient future. That's exactly the future we want to build with Next Generation EU.
    Now, let's deep dive for a moment into these plans, because behind all the spreadsheets and the countless figures you'll see, national plans allow us a glimpse into Europe’s future. They address structural challenges more comprehensively than ever before.
    Labour market reforms will reinforce social safety nets and inclusion. Fiscal reforms will make public finances and tax systems more sustainable. Strengthened governance will improve the business environment, especially for SMEs. And digitalisation of education and our economies will boost Europe’s competitiveness on a global scale.
    These plans show that Europeans have a very clear vision of what is necessary for their future. Just let me give you a few examples. For example, the cross-border projects on renewable hydrogen or the precision medicine powered by AI, or the smart clean transport for suburban areas, just to name a few. 
    And now let me mention some figures, first for the protection of nature and climate. Today, the member states are spending around 50 billion euros on clean energy, for example, for the production of renewable energies or green hydrogen. An additional 50 billion euros are planned for building renovation - this covers the entire spectrum, from social housing to administrative buildings. And at least 85 billion euros are being used to promote sustainable mobility, such as the digitalization of railway infrastructure, charging stations for electric cars, and seamless mobility in our cities.
    These are exactly the investments we want. Because we all know: traffic and buildings are now among the largest emitters of greenhouse gases. That means something has to change, but above all through modernization.
    And the same dynamics can be seen with our next goal, digitalization. Today it is a fact that all member states will invest significantly more than 20% in digitization - and thus more than ""NextGenerationEU"" requires. Examples are cross-border 5G corridors, broadband expansion in rural areas, the digitalization of public services - extremely necessary! - up to the development of the most modern microprocessors.
    All these plans are indeed those that the next generation will benefit from. Almost all member states want to improve the digital skills of young people. They invest in youth employment, in dual vocational training, they invest in childcare and in the modernization of their universities.
    So, ladies and gentlemen, dear honorable Members, now we have to implement these plans, and there, honorable Members, I count on you. In recent weeks you have been scrutinizing the national plans and you came up with legitimate questions. And we value your contribution. We will continue to meet regularly for our structured dialogue and we need your scrutiny.
    It's the very first time that we do this. So let's make it right. Let's get it right, because, as always, Parliament is our partner when it comes to improving our European Union. Our experts at the Commission will continue to be available to discuss with you. They carefully assess whether each and every national plan meets the objectives we have agreed upon. And let us remind ourselves: 20% at least in digitization, 37% at least in the European Green Deal, these objectives are set in stone. And from what we see so far, if anything, quite a number of plans are even more ambitious.
    Honorable Members, with Next Generation EU we decided to make our recovery a European recovery. The Next Generation EU can deliver so much more than 27 individual recovery plans ever could, and this will further unite our Union. We Europeans are in this crisis together. We will come out of it together. We will come out stronger than ever before. Next Generation EU has shown how much we can achieve when we all work together. So with more confidence than ever, I say long live Europe!
    (Applause)"};"In the speech, it is mentioned that one of the investments planned for sustainable mobility is ""charging stations for electric cars"". This is part of the 85 billion euros being used to promote sustainable mobility, which also includes digitalization of railway infrastructure and seamless mobility in cities.

This is a specific example given by the speaker to illustrate the kind of investments being made under the Next Generation EU plan. The mention of charging stations for electric cars suggests that the European Union is investing in the development of electric vehicle infrastructure, with the goal of promoting sustainable transportation options."};0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2021-06-08_7-6";"Luis Garicano";"Renew";" On behalf of the Renew Group. - Mr. President, Madam Minister, Vice-President Dombrovskis, Madam Von der Leyen, when we approved the recovery fund almost a year ago, our objective was a fund to transform Europe, not simply to fill a hole in the finances of the Governments. And some countries are taking advantage of this opportunity for transformation: Italy and Greece propose far-reaching reforms in their administration, France proposes an ambitious plan for training young people. Other countries, unfortunately, are not taking advantage of this opportunity and we see serious shortcomings in these plans.
    I will tell you about those shortcomings, I will illustrate them with the Spanish plan. I see three serious problems.
    The first is the lack of reforms referred to by another deputy earlier. Spain has a very high level of temporal unemployment - the highest in Europe - a very high school dropout rate - the highest in Europe - and the highest youth unemployment rate. This will not be corrected, Madam President, without deep labor market and educational reforms.
    Second shortcoming: we must invest in people, not things. The plans spend a lot of money on things and do not invest in our citizens. The Spanish plan, for example, spends a lot of money on subsidizing the purchase of electric vehicles or rehabilitating housing, but only 320 million on educational reinforcement.
    And, in third place, green digital investment must be transformative investment, not the subsidy of durable consumer goods. We must invest in our science, in our industry, we must invest in the future. If not, we will be a continent where we drive Teslas, but we will continue with our own problems.
    Madam President, Article 26 of the Regulation obliges you to take into account the opinion of this Parliament and we have asked, in the Resolution we debate today, for transparency, reforms and investment in people. I hope, Madam President, that the Commission will do its job and ensure that this opportunity is not a lost opportunity for Europe."};"According to the speech, the Spanish plan spends ""a lot of money on subsidizing the purchase of electric vehicles"" as part of its investment strategy. This is mentioned as one example of how the plan prioritizes spending on physical goods (such as electric vehicles) over investing in people and their development."};0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;
"2021-06-23_17-30";"Elisa Ferreira";"NA";" Member of the Commission. – Madam President, today’s debate clearly demonstrates the value of cohesion policy and the hope it brings for European citizens and for the regions. Thank you for the kind words that a lot of you addressed to the Commission. I will share them with the teams.
In fact, now it is time to move from words to actions, finalising the preparation of programmes on the ground. Here, I would like to underline that we should never forget the main purpose of cohesion policy. It is to promote convergence and correct internal disparities. For this, we need to look at the territories, address them and develop their development challenges, including rural areas, areas in demographic decline or with natural handicaps, peripheral regions, and outermost regions.
I firmly believe that the green transition and the digital transition both bring new opportunities in new and in established industries, from sustainable tourism to sustainable transport, and from renewable energy networks to batteries. The digital and green transformation and teleworking also offer a golden opportunity to rebalance economic activity across European territories and make new regions competitive in new and innovative industries. 
But all these opportunities require planning and then investment, and this investment has got to be done in coherence across all the different instruments that we have in front of us. The recovery and resilience plans, the Coronavirus Response Investment Initiative, the Just Transition Fund, REACT—EU and the 2021—2027 multiannual financial framework. They require that we apply a principle of ‘no harm to cohesion’ to all our policies and that, in the opposite sense, we benefit and we stimulate all the possible synergies so that in fact we do no harm to cohesion, meaning that nothing should aggravate the regional divide or hamper regional convergence.
So our work together has just begun. It starts today with the adoption of these regulations. Let’s keep monitoring and developing a new, more sustainable and more cohesive Europe for all our citizens. Thank you once again."};"The text does not mention electric vehicles directly. However, it mentions ""sustainable transport"" as one of the opportunities brought by the green transition.

In the context of the speech, the speaker is highlighting the potential benefits of the green transition for European territories and industries. They mention that sustainable tourism, renewable energy networks, and batteries are all part of this transition. While electric vehicles are not specifically mentioned, it can be inferred that they might be included under the broader category of ""sustainable transport"".

Overall, the text does not provide any specific information about electric vehicles, but rather uses the term ""sustainable transport"" to describe a broader concept related to environmental sustainability and transportation."};0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2021-06-23_17-42";"Roberts Zīle";"ECR";"
    In addition to the above, support for cohesion projects throughout Europe can help establish a uniform and effective cooperation between various regions and countries. For example, health, economic, and transport issues. These resources are particularly suitable for supporting the European transport system, as well as promoting multimodal transport and using sustainable transport. One of the European Union's identified priority projects - the Rail Baltica project - has received support from the Cohesion Fund. Together with national support, these project results will be achieved not only by the Cohesion Fund but also by contributing to the achievement of ERAF objectives, thus, together with national support, these project results will contribute to making European regions and countries more connected and sustainable."};"There is no mention of electric vehicles in the provided speech. The text only discusses cohesion projects, transport issues, multimodal transport, and sustainable transport, but does not specifically mention electric vehicles."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2021-06-24_4-33";"Laura Huhtasaari";"ID";" – Dear Mr. Speaker, everyone wants to protect nature, the problem is the means. By 2030 in the EU, it is aimed that hundreds of thousands of people will switch to using electric cars. Where will CO2-free electricity come from? Will more electricity be produced with coal and oil? The modern diesel car is more climate-friendly than an electric car charged with coal.
    Finnish voices are heard in the EU, but they do not show up in decision-making. Nuclear power is under threat for Finland. In coal-fired power plants, Finnish industry is not listened to. The commission treats hydropower somewhat reluctantly. In the forest strategy, Finnish forest industry is not taken into account. If now the commission tries to socialize Finland's forests, the Finns must question the legitimacy of the entire EU.
    Today is June 24th, it is Brexit Day. Congratulations Britain and good health to Nigel Farage!"};"According to the speech, by 2030, hundreds of thousands of people in the EU are expected to switch to using electric cars. However, the speaker questions where CO2-free electricity will come from to charge these electric vehicles, implying that they may not be as environmentally friendly as initially thought if charged with coal-generated electricity. The speaker also mentions that a modern diesel car is more climate-friendly than an electric car charged with coal."};0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;
"2021-06-24_4-67";"Hildegard Bentele";"EPP";" – Dear Madam President, dear Mr. Commissioner, dear colleagues! I belong to those who welcome the now found position - a tightening of our CO2 reduction targets by 55% until 2030. Because let's take a look at the starting situation: We still cannot ensure in the EU that each individual member state commits to the climate neutrality target by 2050. And many scientists consider the compliance with the Paris goals to be already too late for 2050. In this context, I cannot understand the fundamental opposition of the Greens, which they pursue here with the far right and the far left.
    I want a Europe that does not lose its industrial base but transforms it. I want a Europe that produces green high technology and better seizes the opportunities of digitalization so that we can make progress in climate protection quickly, but also to hold future-proof jobs in Europe.
    A confession like this have I not yet heard from my green colleagues. On the contrary: They come with increasingly artificial, unachievable requirements, which hinder innovative solutions such as hydrogen and their urgently needed scaling.
    And they close their eyes to the fact that the millions of more electric cars, wind turbines, energy and data storage required raw materials must be mined somewhere. And I find: best not under unfavorable conditions in China or Africa.
    Instead of expanding the proven effective instrument of emissions trading to buildings, heat, and traffic so that we can also make faster progress in reducing CO2 in cities like Berlin, they prefer to sink billions into expropriation and nationalization.
    My dear ladies and gentlemen, in my view, it is now our most important task to give the economy planning and investment security. And we do this with today's vote."};"According to the speech, it is mentioned that ""millions of more electric cars"" are required to reduce CO2 emissions. The speaker criticizes their green colleagues for not acknowledging the need for raw materials to be mined for these electric cars, suggesting that they should not be extracted under unfavorable conditions in countries like China or Africa."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;
"2021-06-24_4-77";"Guido Reil";"ID";"
    In writing. - The EU must become climate neutral! That is what the Climate Law states, which you have just passed. Our climate goals are our ""Apollo 13"" moments - as Mrs. von der Leyen explained: The EU will be an example for the whole world. It will finally take on the global leadership role that it has long deserved. Reality looks very different: The EU's climate policy is harmful to the economy and a massive competitive disadvantage for our companies. We are threatened by a battery of measures and restrictions. The goal is the total ban on combustion engines. This does not bother the large, globally-oriented car manufacturers much. They simply shift their production to non-European countries and then build their combustion engines there. In the EU, only electric cars will be built in the future. These are much simpler to manufacture, so fewer workers are needed. As a result, many people will become unemployed. Small and medium-sized suppliers will also be affected. They cannot relocate their production at will but are tied to a location. Many of them will go bankrupt. Even more people will become unemployed. The EU's intention to save the world with its climate policy is a direct attack on our prosperity. We must defend ourselves against it before it's too late."};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned related to electric vehicles:

1. The goal of the EU's climate policy is to ban combustion engines completely.
2. As a result, only electric cars will be built in the future within the EU.
3. Electric cars are simpler to manufacture, which means fewer workers are needed for production.
4. This could lead to many people becoming unemployed, especially small and medium-sized suppliers who cannot relocate their production easily.

In summary, the speaker is criticizing the EU's climate policy, arguing that it will harm the economy and lead to job losses in the automotive industry due to the shift towards electric vehicles."};0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2021-07-06_4-8";"Isabel García Muñoz";"S&D";" On behalf of the S&D Group. - Mr President, Commissioner Vălean, I am pleased that we can finally definitively approve the new ""Connecting Europe"" Mechanism 2021-2027.
    It has been months of hard work, tough negotiations, and I would like to congratulate the rapporteurs on the good result obtained. The next MFF will continue to promote investment in sustainable infrastructure and the decarbonization of transport, creating added value for Europe and strengthening the socio-economic and territorial cohesion of the Union.
    The European Green Pact demands more sustainable, intelligent and resilient mobility, and we have achieved that this new MFF responds to these needs and is clearly green, by allocating 60% of the budget to projects that support the Union's climate objectives and prioritizing more sustainable transport modes such as railways, waterways and motorways of the sea.
    Transport financing for the next seven years will help improve European mobility, making it safer, innovative and accessible to all, including passengers with reduced mobility. It will also promote multimodality, strengthening connections with ports and airports. At the same time, it will also improve the efficiency of freight transport by rail, focusing on urban nodes, bottlenecks, pending links and cross-border projects.
    As you can imagine, this agreement represents an opportunity to advance in the development of networks and trans-European corridors such as the Atlantic and Mediterranean, which run through Spain, and a significant boost for our regions, like mine - Aragon - with the passage of the Cantabrian-Mediterranean corridor.
    On the other hand, the agreement on ""Intelligent TEN-Ts"" (which we also approve in this Plenary), will help accelerate the execution of the network, thanks to greater clarity and simplicity in authorization and public procurement procedures, of particular importance for cross-border projects. This will provide legal certainty to promoters and, therefore, will be an essential attraction mechanism for private investment.
    Finally, the new MFF will focus on synergies between the transport, energy and digital sectors, which will promote a more efficient intersectoral effort in areas such as connected and automated mobility and alternative fuels, benefiting all European citizens."};"The text does not mention electric vehicles specifically. However, it mentions ""alternative fuels"" as one of the areas that will benefit from the synergies between the transport, energy, and digital sectors. This could potentially include electric vehicles, but it is not explicitly mentioned.

The text focuses on promoting sustainable transport modes such as railways, waterways, and motorways of the sea, as well as multimodality and the development of networks and trans-European corridors. It also mentions improving the efficiency of freight transport by rail and promoting connected and automated mobility, which could be related to electric vehicles in some way. However, the text does not provide any specific information about electric vehicles or their role in the new MFF (Multiannual Financial Framework)."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2021-07-06_4-14";"Mario Furore";"NI";"
    Mr. President, esteemed colleagues, Commissioner, European citizens are asking for efficient, fast and sustainable transport. This is the path to connect Europe and these are the objectives on which the 30 billion that the European Union allocates must be spent.
    However, there are many lights and also shadows. I am positive about investments in digitalization and strengthening corridors from North Europe to South Italy, but we would have wanted greater ambition on decarbonizing energy networks, closing the door to gas and opening it to renewables.
    Furthermore, I wonder why the European Parliament continues to ignore the criticisms of the European Court of Auditors on the Turin-Lyon TAV project, on the shameful delays, inflated traffic forecasts and harmful consequences for the environment. The funding of this work, included in the agreement we are voting today, is a self-goal that we cannot remain indifferent to.
    I conclude by saying that rather than focusing on works with real added value, we need works for citizens and not cathedrals in the desert."};"There is no mention of electric vehicles in the provided speech. The text only discusses transportation, energy networks, decarbonization, and infrastructure projects such as the Turin-Lyon TAV project, but does not specifically mention electric vehicles."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2021-07-06_4-25";"Jakop G. Dalunde";"Greens/EFA";"
    Mr. President, it seems appropriate to discuss this legislation on transport issues while a large part of Europe is going out for summer vacation. Slowly but surely, it will become possible to travel again. However, based on how the pandemic develops and assuming it is over, we must change our way of traveling. We must fly less and travel more by train, the most sustainable way to travel.
    What we vote on today helps a little in getting closer to using more trains. I hope that the Commission will take into account our recommendations on how Europe's railways can be used more effectively and that EU funding for new tracks with this law can be given more quickly and with less bureaucracy.
    But there is still a lot to do. Above all, we must rethink what EU funds in the transport sector actually can go to. Pipelines and building bridges to handle tanks are completely the wrong way to go. That is not what this fund should be used for, not for the military, but to promote sustainable transportation instead.
    The added value that the EU can contribute lies in railways, and investments should go towards eliminating bottlenecks and missing tracks between European countries so that we can build a coherent European railway network. That is what we need to promote sustainable transport."};"There is no mention of electric vehicles in the provided speech. The speaker discusses trains, railways, pipelines, bridges, and tanks, but does not mention electric vehicles at all. Therefore, there is nothing to summarize regarding electric vehicles in this text."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2021-07-08_16-18";"Marian-Jean Marinescu";"EPP";" – Mr. President, Madam Commissioner, dear colleagues, I believe that the best social protection can be provided by a viable and strong company from an economic point of view. I think that companies in this industry should be supported, but not only those that fly, airline companies, but also traffic service companies and airports.
    Only in this way can they get out of this crisis and, at the same time, the Commission can supervise to make sure that these aid does not affect fair competition. Traffic has started to recover, reaching two-thirds, but you have to keep in mind that, besides the Covid-19 crisis, these companies are going through a complicated period due to the ecological treaty.
    There are voices saying that we should close flights, ban flights and, at the same time, protect workers. I believe that banning flights and protecting workers cannot be combined in any way. Therefore, I believe that mobility is a right of European citizens and this mobility must be ensured by all means of transport.
    The best solution for aviation is to have research, development and to reach sustainable transport. I'm sorry that there is double talk. We want sustainability from an ecological point of view, but at the same time, we don't want to pay more for Clean Sky. Only the PPE Group has supported increasing the Clean Sky budget. I believe that more can still be done in this regard, and as for labor relations, they should be in line with the legislation of each Member State."};"There is no mention of electric vehicles in the provided speech. The text only discusses aviation, traffic, and sustainable transport, but does not mention electric vehicles specifically. Therefore, there is no summary to provide as it is not mentioned in the text."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2021-09-14_3-6";"Pascal Canfin";"Renew";" On behalf of the Renew Group. - Mr. President, dear colleagues, Vice-President of the Commission, we are living an exciting and unprecedented moment. Unprecedented because it is the first time that, in the European Parliament, we have the possibility to say yes to the Commission's proposal to end the sale of petrol and diesel cars, fossil fuel vehicles, to move on to a new generation, especially electric cars.
    It is the first time that we have the possibility to say yes to a carbon adjustment mechanism at the borders which will put climate, carbon, into the rules of international trade, and we will be the first in the world to do so.
    We also have the possibility to say yes to extending the maritime sector into the carbon market. Again, this is the first time in the world that a political entity decides to integrate the maritime sector to make it pay the fair price of carbon. And all this, the Renew Group fully supports.
    You know, Mr. Timmermans, we are very skeptical about one part of the climate plan you propose, namely extending the carbon market to buildings and transport, because we consider that the political cost is very high and the impact on climate is very low. We will therefore make alternative proposals, the Renew Group teams are already working on these alternative proposals and restructuring this proposal from the Commission which does not suit us.
    But I would also like to ask you, Mr. Timmermans: in the climate law, we have agreed together to give the European Commission the possibility to tell the Council and Parliament, at each stage of the legislative process, if we are still in line with the 57% objective. Because you know, we have negotiated more than 55%, that is 57%. How will you proceed? How will you make it happen, starting tomorrow, during the next discussions in the Environment Committee, when voting in the Environment Committee and in the other related committees? When voting in plenary and at the Council? How will you guide us, in a way, to ensure that we do not derail under the weight of certain lobbies?
    I heard Peter Liese who, already, defended the non-end of thermal vehicles in 2035 to move on to new fossil fuel technologies. We will have dozens and dozens of proposals that risk weakening the climate package. We need you to activate the climate law and guarantee that we are on the right track."};"According to the speech, the Renew Group supports the European Commission's proposal to end the sale of petrol and diesel cars (fossil fuel vehicles) and move on to a new generation, specifically electric cars. This is mentioned as one of the exciting and unprecedented moments in the European Parliament, where they have the possibility to say yes to this proposal for the first time."};0;0;1;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2021-09-14_3-8";"Paolo Borchia";"ID";"
    On behalf of the ID group - Mr. President, esteemed colleagues, in the next ten years, do what has been done in the last thirty, I would say, for a post-pandemic context, so I think at least some questions should be asked.
    For example, this morning I did not hear adequate reflections on the trend of bills for businesses and consumers. Not a word on the increase in water demand, since the extraction of rare earths and the increase in metals that this green revolution will need to drain greater water resources. Not a word on CO2 emissions in Europe over the last thirty years, which have been offset by the trend of emissions in the rest of the world. So others pollute, while in Europe there are imposing more restrictive legislations.
    I consider this environmentalism to be short-sighted, very fashionable and catering to the rich, as I don't know how many will be able to afford fully electric cars in 13 years.
    Billions of the Recovery fund will end up in China, a country we are increasingly technologically dependent on, since 60% of the raw materials for this revolution will be imported from this country. So this plan will eventually replace European dependence on Middle Eastern oil with Chinese technology dependence, to the delight of international competition, far from being a good example.
    Therefore, esteemed colleagues, let's be careful because this is no longer about Europeanness, but rather collaboration."};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned related to electric vehicles:

1. The speaker questions how many people will be able to afford fully electric cars in 13 years, implying that they may not be accessible or affordable for everyone.
2. It is mentioned that 60% of the raw materials needed for this ""green revolution"" (presumably referring to the production of electric vehicles) will be imported from China.

These are the only points related to electric vehicles mentioned in the speech."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;1;1;
"2021-09-14_3-11";"Kostas Papadakis";"NI";"
    Mr. President, the European Union's ""Fit for 55"" package means a direct increase in the burden on working people due to the so-called ""green levies"" of the chambers, from green taxes on coal emissions to electricity, which ultimately end up in bills, as the most accurate natural air and the absolute and stable monopoly of renewable energy sources. With climate change, the energy sector is being liberalized, leading to price increases, rationing, and a carbon levy that comes either with the whip of old-fashioned subsidies or with the carrot of incentives for the purchase of electric vehicles. All these measures, like those of the New Democracy government in Greece, will be paid by the people, who will bear the unbearable ""super-tax"" of the Revolving Door. Only if the people are freed from market laws and capitalist profits, with production, energy sources, and networks becoming social property, only then will the energy plan serve the public interest."};"According to the speech, it is mentioned that there are incentives for the purchase of electric vehicles as part of the carbon levy. This means that the government is offering some kind of encouragement or reward to people who buy electric vehicles, likely in an effort to promote the adoption of environmentally friendly transportation options."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;1;0;
"2021-09-14_3-23";"Sylvia Limmer";"ID";"
    Mr. President! When will you tell the citizens that the ban on combustion engines from 2035 marks the end of individual mobility? It is not planned - it could also not be - to replace all petrol cars with electric vehicles. Just for the additional electricity in Germany, twelve nuclear power plants would be needed, which will never exist - apart from resource consumption. When will you tell the citizens that an offer-oriented electricity market and so-called smart meters mean that electricity will be switched off when it is not available? Without storage with the so-called renewables, this will not be a rarity. When will you admit to the citizens, Mr. Timmermans, that the future you plan is one of renunciation, prohibitions, scarcity, unfreedom, and dispossession? Planned economy and socialism, even with the prefix ""eco-"", are regression and destruction of freedom, prosperity, environment, and human community!"};"According to the speech, it is mentioned that:

* The ban on combustion engines from 2035 does not necessarily mean replacing all petrol cars with electric vehicles.

That's the only mention of electric vehicles in the text. There is no further discussion or details provided about electric vehicles."};0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2021-09-14_3-30";"Isabella Tovaglieri";"ID";" – Mr. President, esteemed colleagues, the European Commission has decided that within 14 years, no more internal combustion engines can be produced in Europe.
    We from the League are not prejudicially opposed to the Green Deal, but we believe that the energy transition must take place in a feasible and above all progressive manner.
    It cannot be converted, therefore, from today to tomorrow entire armies of workers into computer technicians capable of programming an electric car, and the vast supply chain that produces components for internal combustion engines – 100 companies with 7,000 employees just in the province of Varese, leaders in Italy in this sector – cannot suddenly wake up and start producing software.
    The concrete risk is the closure of many companies, hundreds of thousands of unemployed, with the paradox that most consumers will not be able to afford an expensive electric vehicle.
    Therefore, the Commission should slow down this mad dash towards climate neutrality and put measurement and common sense back at the center of its green policies."};"According to the speech, it is mentioned that:

* Electric cars require programming by computer technicians.
* Most consumers may not be able to afford an expensive electric vehicle.

These are the only two points related to electric vehicles mentioned in the text. The speaker is expressing concerns about the rapid transition to electric vehicles and the potential impact on workers and companies involved in producing internal combustion engines, as well as the affordability of electric vehicles for consumers."};0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;
"2021-09-15_2-2";"Ursula von der Leyen";"NA";" President of the European Commission. – Madam President, honourable Members, I think many are the people who feel their lives have been on pause while the world has been on fast-forward, because the speed of the events and the enormity of the challenges are sometimes very difficult to grasp.
And this has also been a time of soul-searching. People are re-evaluating their own lives. We are having wider debates on shared vaccines and shared values. But as I look back on this past year, and if I look at the state of the Union today, I see a strong soul in everything that we do.
It was Robert Schuman who said: ‘Europe needs a soul, an ideal and the political will to serve this ideal’. And Europe has brought those words to life in the last twelve months. In the biggest global health crisis for a century, we chose to go it together so that every part of Europe had access to the life—saving vaccines.
In the deepest global economic crisis for decades, we chose to go it together with Next Generation EU. And in the gravest planetary crisis of all time, again we chose to go it together with the European Green Deal. We did it together as a Commission, and I thank from the bottom of my heart my outstanding College of Commissioners for the enormous support during that time. We did it together as a Parliament, with 27 Member States, as one Europe, and I think we can be proud of it.
But corona times are not over. There is still much grief in our society as the pandemic lingers. There are hearts we can never mend, life stories we can never finish and time we can never give back to our young.
We face new and enduring challenges in a world recovering and fracturing unevenly. So there is no question, the next year will be another test of character. But I believe that it is when you are tested that your spirit, your soul, truly shines through. And as I look across our Union, I know that Europe will pass the test.
And what gives me that confidence is the inspiration we can draw from Europe’s young people. Because our youth put meaning into empathy and solidarity. They believe we have a responsibility towards the planet. And while they are anxious about the future, they are determined to make it better.
Our Union will be stronger if it is more like our next generation: reflective, determined and caring. Grounded in values and bold in action. And this spirit will be more important than ever over the next twelve months. This is the message in the letter of intent I sent this morning to President Sassoli and Prime Minister Janša to outline our priorities for the year ahead.
Honourable Members, a year is long in the time of pandemics. When I stood here in front of you 12 months ago, I did not know when, or even if, we could have a safe and effective vaccine against COVID-19. But today, against all critics, Europe is among the world leaders. More than 70% of our adult population is fully vaccinated. We were the only ones to share half of our vaccine production with the rest of the world. We delivered more than 700 million doses of vaccines to the Europeans.
Indeed, we delivered also more than another 700 million to the rest of the world, to more than 130 countries. And we are the only region in the world to achieve that.
Honourable Members, a pandemic is a marathon, it’s not a sprint. We followed the science. We delivered to Europe. We delivered to the rest of the world. We did it the right way, because we did it the European way. And I think it worked.
But while we have every reason to be confident, we have no reason to be complacent. Our first and most urgent priority is to speed up global vaccination. With less than 1% of global doses administered in low-income countries, the scale of injustice and the level of urgency is obvious. This is one of the great geopolitical issues in our time.
Team Europe is investing EUR 1 billion to ramp up mRNA production capacity with Africa. We have already committed to share 250 million doses of vaccine. I can announce today that the Commission will add a new donation of another 200 million doses until the middle of next year. This is an investment in solidarity and it is an investment also in global health.
The second priority is to continue our efforts here in Europe. We see worrisome divergences between Member States where vaccination rates are concerned. So we need to keep up the momentum. And Europe is ready. We have 1.8 billion additional doses secured. This is enough for us and our neighbourhood when booster shots are needed. So let’s do everything possible that this does not turn into a pandemic of the unvaccinated.
And my third point, the final priority, is to strengthen our pandemic preparedness. Last year, I said it was time to build a European health union. Today we are delivering. With our proposal we get the HERA authority up and running. This will be a huge asset to deal with future health threats earlier and better.
We have the innovation and scientific capacity. We have the private sector knowledge. We have competent national authorities. And now we have to bring all of that together, including massive funding.
So I am proposing a new health preparedness and resilience mission for the whole of the European Union, and it should be backed up by Team Europe investment of EUR 50 billion by 2027, to make sure that no virus will ever turn a local epidemic in a global pandemic. There is no better return on investment than that.
Honourable Members, the work on the European Health Union is a big step forward. And I want to thank this House for your support. We have shown that when we act together, we are can act fast.
Take the EU digital certificate. Today, more than 400 million certificates have been generated across Europe. Forty-two countries in four different continents are plugged in. We proposed it in March. You pushed hard, you helped enormously. Three months later – three months later only – it was up and running. So while the rest of the world was talking about it, Europe just did it.
And we did a lot of things right. We moved fast to create SURE. This supported over 31 million workers and 2.5 million companies across Europe. We learned the lessons from the past when we were too divided and too delayed. And the difference is stark. Last time it took us eight years for the eurozone GDP to get back to pre-crisis levels. This time we expect 19 countries to be at pre-pandemic levels this year, with the rest following next.
Growth in the euro area outpaced both the US and China in the last quarter. But this is only the beginning. And the lessons from the financial crisis could serve as a cautionary tale. At that time, Europe declared victory too soon and we paid the price for that. And we will not repeat that mistake.
The good news is that with Next Generation EU we will both invest in short—term recovery and in the long-term prosperity. We will address structural issues in our economy, from labour market reforms in Spain to pension reforms in Slovenia, or to tax reform in Austria for example.
In an unprecedented manner, we will invest in 5G and fibre. But equally important is the investment in digital skills. This is such an important topic. This task needs leaders’ attention and it needs a structured dialogue at top level. We really have to emphasise that and put a strong focus on it. Our response provides a clear direction to market and investors alike.
But, as we look ahead, we also need to reflect on how the crisis has affected the shape of our economy, from increased debts, to uneven impact on different sectors, or new ways of working. And to do that, the Commission will relaunch the discussion on the Economic Governance Review in the coming weeks. The aim is to build a consensus on the way forward well ahead of 2023.
Honourable Members, we will soon celebrate 30 years of the single market. For 30 years it has been the great enabler of progress and prosperity in Europe. At the outset of the pandemic, we had to defend it against the pressures of erosion and fragmentation. For our recovery, the single market is the driver of good jobs and competitiveness, and that is particularly important in the digital single market.
We have made ambitious proposals in the last year. For example to contain the gatekeeper power of the major platforms, to underpin the democratic responsibilities of those platforms, to foster innovation, to channel the power of artificial intelligence.
Digital is the make-or-break issue and Member States also share that view. For example if you look at the digital spending in Next Generation EU – and you know we have a 20% target – we will even overshoot that 20% target. That is good. That reflects the importance of investing in our European tech sovereignty.
But allow me to focus on semi-conductors for a moment. These tiny chips that make everything work, from smartphones to electric scooters, from trains or entire smart factories. There is no digital without those chips. And while we speak, whole production lines are already working at reduced speed – despite growing demand – because of a shortage of semiconductors.
And while global demand has exploded, Europe’s share across the entire value chain, from the design or manufacturing capacities, has shrunk. We depend right now on state-of-the-art chips manufactured by Asia. So this is not just a matter of our competitiveness. This is also a matter of tech sovereignty. So let’s put all of our forces in it to improve the situation.
We will present a new European Chips Act. We need to link together our world-class research, design and testing capacities. We need to coordinate the European level and national investment along the value chain. And the aim is to jointly create a state-of-the-art European chip ecosystem, including production. That ensures our security of supply and will develop new markets for ground-breaking European tech.
And yes, I know this is a daunting task, without any question. It is a big, big goal that I put out there. And I know that there are some now that claim it cannot be done. But they have said the same 20 years ago about Galileo, and now look where we are. We got our act together.
Today Europe satellite provide the navigation system for more than 2 billion smartphones worldwide. So we did it once. We are world leaders in Galileo now. Let’s be bold again and let’s focus all our forces on the semi—conductors, and let’s go and be a world leader again. This should be our aim.
Mesdames et Messieurs les députés, la pandémie a laissé de profondes cicatrices, impactant énormément notre économie sociale de marché. Soir après soir, nous étions tous là, à nos fenêtres, devant nos portes, pour applaudir les travailleurs de première ligne. Nous avons tous senti combien nous dépendions de ces travailleurs, de celles et ceux qui se dévouent pour un salaire inférieur, moins de protections, moins de sécurité.
Les applaudissements se sont peut-être estompés, mais la force de nos émotions doit perdurer. Et c’est pourquoi la mise en œuvre du socle européen des droits sociaux est si importante. Il s’agit d’emplois décents, de conditions de travail justes, de soins de santé meilleurs et d’un bon équilibre de vie. Si la pandémie nous a appris une chose, c’est bien la valeur du temps et qu’il n’y a point de temps aussi précieux que le temps consacré à nos proches.
C’est ainsi que nous proposerons une nouvelle stratégie européenne de soins afin que chaque homme et chaque femme puisse bénéficier des meilleurs soins possibles et trouver le meilleur équilibre de vie. Mais, Mesdames et Messieurs, l’équité sociale n’est pas seulement une question de temps, c’est également une question d’équité fiscale. 
Dans notre économie sociale de marché, il est bon que les entreprises réalisent des profits. Mais si elles réalisent des profits, c’est bien grâce à la qualité de nos infrastructures, de notre sécurité sociale, de nos systèmes éducatifs. Alors, c’est la moindre des choses qu’elles paient leur juste contribution. Et c’est pourquoi nous continuerons à lutter contre l’évasion et la fraude fiscale. Nous proposerons un projet de loi ciblant les profits dissimulés derrière des sociétés-écrans et nous mettrons tout en œuvre pour sceller l’accord mondial historique sur le taux minimal d’impôt sur les sociétés. Payer un juste montant d’impôt n’est pas seulement une question de finances publiques, mais surtout une simple question d’équité.
Mesdames et Messieurs les députés, nous avons tous profité des fondements de notre économie européenne, sociale, de marché et nous devons faire en sorte que la prochaine génération puisse construire son avenir. Nous sommes en présence d’une jeune génération hautement éduquée, extrêmement talentueuse et fortement motivée, d’une génération qui a tellement sacrifié pour préserver la sécurité des autres. La jeunesse, c’est normalement le moment de la découverte, là où on fait de nouvelles expériences, où on trouve les amis de toute une vie, où on découvre son propre chemin. Mais qu’est-ce qu’on a demandé aux jeunes aujourd’hui? De garder les distances sociales, de rester confinés et de faire l’école à la maison, pendant plus d’un an.
C’est ainsi que tout ce que nous faisons, du pacte vert à Next Generation EU, vise à protéger leur avenir. C’est aussi pourquoi Next Generation EU doit être financée par de nouvelles ressources propres, sur lesquelles nous travaillons. Mais nous devons également veiller à ne pas créer de nouvelles failles parce que l’Europe a besoin de toute sa jeunesse. Nous devons encourager ceux qui tombent entre les mailles du filet. Ceux qui n’ont pas d’emploi. Ceux qui ne suivent ni enseignement ni formation. Pour eux, nous allons offrir un nouveau programme: Alma.
Alma offrira à ces jeunes la possibilité d’une expérience professionnelle temporaire dans un autre État membre, parce qu’ils méritent eux aussi de vivre une expérience comme Erasmus pour acquérir des compétences, pour créer des liens et se forger leur propre identité européenne. Mais si nous voulons façonner notre Union à leur image, les jeunes doivent pouvoir façonner l’avenir de l’Europe. Une union doit avoir une âme et une vision qui leur parle, comme Jacques Delors le demandait. Et, je cite, «Comment fera-t-on l’Europe si les jeunes ne voient pas en elle un projet collectif et une représentation de leur propre avenir?».
C’est pourquoi nous proposerons de faire de 2022 l’année de la jeunesse européenne. Faisons une année consacrée à valoriser les jeunes qui ont tant consacré aux autres. Et les jeunes doivent mener les débats de la conférence sur l’avenir de l’Europe, c’est leur avenir et ça doit être leur conférence.
Et comme nous l’avons dit au début du mandat, la Commission sera disposée à donner suite aux points qui seront décidés par la Conférence.
This is a generation with a conscience. They are pushing us to go further and faster to tackle the climate crisis. And the events of the summer only served to explain why. We saw floods in Belgium and Germany. And wildfires burning from the Greek islands to the hills in France. And if we don’t believe our own eyes, we only have to follow the science.
The United Nations recently published an IPCC report, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. It is the authority on the science of climate change. The report leaves no doubt. Climate change is only man-made. But since it is man-made, we can do something about it. 
As I heard it said: it’s warming. It’s us. We’re sure. It’s bad, but we can fix it. And change is already happening. More electric vehicles than diesel cars were registered in Germany in the first half of this year. Poland is now the EU’s largest exporter of batteries and electric buses. Or take the New European Bauhaus that led to an explosion of creativity of architects, designers, engineers across our Union. And if the European Green Deal has a soul, then it is the New European Bauhaus.
So clearly something is on the move. And this is what the European Green Deal is all about. In my speech last year, I announced our target of at least 55% emissions reduction by 2030. Since then we have together turned our climate goals into legal obligations. And we are the first major economy to present comprehensive legislation in order to get it done.
You have seen the complexity of the detail. But the goal is simple. We will put a price on pollution. We will clean the energy we use. We will have smarter cars and cleaner airplanes. And we will make sure that higher climate ambition comes with more social ambition, because this must be a fair green transition. This is why we proposed a new social climate fund to tackle the energy poverty that already 34 million Europeans suffer from.
So I count on both Parliament and Member States to keep the package and to keep the ambition together. When it comes to climate change and the nature crisis, Europe can do a lot. And it will support others. I am proud to announce today that the European Union will double its external funding for biodiversity, in particular for the most vulnerable countries.
But Europe cannot do it alone. The COP26 in Glasgow will be a moment of truth for the global community. Major economies, from the US to Japan, have set ambitions for climate neutrality in 2050 or shortly after. That’s good. But they need now to be backed up by concrete plans in time for Glasgow. Because current commitments for 2030 will not keep global warming at 1.5°C within reach. 
Every country has a responsibility. The goals that President Xi has set out for China are encouraging. But we call for that same leadership on setting out how China will get there. The world would be relieved if they showed they could peak emissions by mid-decade and move away from coal at home and abroad.
But while every country has a responsibility, major economies like us do have a special duty to the least developed and the most vulnerable countries. The so-called climate finance is essential for them, both for mitigation and adaptation.
In Mexico and in Paris, the major economies committed to provide USD 100 billion a year until 2025 to the least developed and most vulnerable countries. We deliver on our commitments. Team Europe contributes USD 25 billion a year. But others still leave a gaping hole towards reaching the global target. So closing that gap will increase the chance of success in Glasgow.
My message today is that Europe is ready to do more. We will now propose an additional EUR 4 billion for climate finance until 2027. But we expect the United States and our partners to step up too. This is vital because closing the climate finance gap together, the US and the European Union, would be such a strong signal for global climate leadership and it is time to deliver now. We have no time to wait anymore.
This climate and economic leadership is central to Europe’s global and security objectives. It also reflects a wider shift in world affairs at a time of transition towards a new international order. We are entering a new era of hyper-competitiveness. An era in which some stop at nothing to gain influence, from vaccine promises to high interest loans, from missiles to misinformation. An era of regional rivalries and major powers refocusing their attention towards each other.
Recent events in Afghanistan are not the cause of this change, but they are a symptom of it. And first and foremost, I want to be clear. We stand by the Afghan people. 
We stand by the Afghan people, the women and children, prosecutors, journalists and human rights defenders. I think in particular of women judges who are now in hiding from the men they jailed. They have been put at risk for their contribution to justice and the rule of law. We must support them and we will coordinate all efforts with Member States to bring them to safety. And we must continue supporting all Afghans in the country and in neighbouring countries.
We must do everything to avert the real risk that is out there of a major famine and a humanitarian disaster. And we will do our part. We will increase again humanitarian aid for Afghanistan by EUR 100 million. This will be part of a new, wider Afghan support package that we will present in the next weeks to combine all of our efforts.
Witnessing events unfold in Afghanistan was profoundly painful for the families and friends of fallen servicemen and servicewomen. We bow to the sacrifice of those soldiers, diplomats and aid workers who laid down their lives for our common cause. 
To make sure that their service will never be in vain, we have to reflect on how this mission could end so abruptly. There are deeply troubling questions that allies will have to tackle within NATO. But there is simply no security and defence issue where less cooperation is the answer. So we need to invest in our joint partnership and draw on each side’s unique strength. And this is why we are working with Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg on a new EU-NATO Joint Declaration to be presented before the end of the year.
But this is only one part of the equation. Europe can, and clearly should, be able and willing to do more on its own. But if we are to do more, we first need to explain why. I see three broad categories.
First, we need to provide stability in our neighbourhood and across different regions. We are connected to the world by narrow straits, stormy seas and vast land borders. And because of that geography, Europe knows better than anyone else that if you don’t deal in time with a crisis abroad, the crisis will come to you.
Secondly, the nature of the threats we face is evolving rapidly, from hybrid to cyberattacks to the growing arms race in space. We see that disruptive technology has been the great equaliser in the way power can be used today by rogue states and non-state groups. You no longer need an army or missile to cause mass damage. You can paralyse industrial plants, city administrations and hospitals, all you need is your laptop. You can disrupt entire elections with a smartphone and an internet connection.
And the third reason is that our European Union is a unique security provider. There will be missions where NATO or the United Nations will not be present, but where Europe should be. On the ground, our soldiers work side-by-side with police officers, lawyers and doctors, with humanitarian workers and human rights defenders, with teachers and engineers. We can combine military and civilian, alongside with diplomatic and development, and we have a long history in building and protecting peace.
The good news is that over the past years, we have started to develop a kind of European defence ecosystem. But what we need now is the European defence union. In the last weeks, there have been many discussions on expeditionary forces, on what type and how many we need, battlegroups and EU entry forces. 
This is no doubt part of the debate and I think it will be part of the solution, but the more fundamental issue is, why this has not worked in the past. You can have the most advanced forces in the world, but if you are never prepared to use them, of what use are they?
What has held us back until now is not just a shortfall of capacity, it is the lack of political will. And if we develop this political will, there is a lot that we can do at EU level. Allow me to give you three concrete examples.
First, we need to build the foundation for collective decision-making, and this is what I call situational awareness. We fall short if Member States active in the same region do not share their information at the EU level. It is vital that we improve intelligence cooperation. But this is not just about intelligence in the narrow sense. It is about bringing together the knowledge from all services and all sources, from space to police trainers, from open source to development agencies. 
The European Union could have a unique scope and depth of knowledge. It is out there. But we can only use that information and make decisions if we have the full picture. And this is currently not the case. We have the knowledge, but it is disjointed. We have the information but it is fragmented. And this is why the European Union could consider its own Joint Situational Awareness Centre to fuse all of these different pieces of information and to be better prepared, to be fully informed and thus to be able to decide.
Secondly, we need to improve interoperability. This is why we are already investing in common European platforms, from fighter jets to drones and cyber. You know that.
But we have to keep thinking of new ways to use all the possible synergies. One example could be to consider waiving value added tax, the VAT, when buying defence equipment developed and produced in Europe. This would not only increase our interoperability, but it would also decrease our dependencies of today.
And the third point is, we cannot talk about defence without talking about cyber. If everything is connected, everything can be hacked. Given that resources are scarce, we have to bundle our forces. And we should not just be satisfied to address the cyber threat, but also strive to become a leader in cyber security. 
It should be here in Europe where cyber defence tools are developed. And this is why we need a European cyber defence policy, including legislation on common standards under a new European cyber resilience act.
So, we can do a lot at EU level. But Member States need to do more too. And this starts with a common assessment of the threats we face and a common approach to dealing with them. The upcoming Strategic Compass is the key process to this discussion. And we need to decide how we can use all the possibilities that are already in the Treaty. And this is why, under the French Presidency, President Macron and I will convene a summit on European defence. It is time for Europe to step up to the next level.
In a more contested world, protecting our interests is not only about defending ourselves. It is also about forging strong and reliable partnerships. This is not a luxury, it is essential for our future stability, security and prosperity. And this work starts by deepening our partnership with our closest allies.
With the United States we will develop our new agenda for global change. From the new Tech and Technology Council to health security and sustainability, the European Union and the United States will always be stronger together. 
And of course the same goes for our neighbours in the Western Balkans. Before the end of the month, I will travel to the region to send a strong signal of our commitment to the accession process. We owe it to all those young people who believe in a future, in Europe. And this is why we are ramping up our support through our new investment and economic plan, with around a third of the region’s GDP. Because investment in the future of the Western Balkans is an investment in the future of the European Union.
And we will also continue investing in our partnerships in our neighbourhood, from stepping up our engagement in the Eastern Partnership to implementing the new agenda for the Mediterranean and continuing to work on the different aspects of our relationship to Turkey.
If Europe is to become a more active global player, it also needs to focus on the next generation of partnerships. In this spirit, today’s new EU-Indo-Pacific strategy is a milestone. It reflects the growing importance of the region to our prosperity and our security. But it also reflects the fact that autocratic regimes use it to try to expand their influence. Europe needs to be more active and to be more present in the region. So we will work together to deepen trade links, strengthen global supply chains and develop new investment projects on green and digital technologies.
This is a template for how Europe can redesign its model to connect the world. We are pretty good at financing roads. But it does not make any sense for Europe if we build a perfect road between a Chinese copper mine, that is Chinese-owned, and a harbour that is Chinese-owned.
So we have to get smarter when it comes to these kinds of investments. And this is why we will soon present our new connectivity strategy called Global Gateway. We will build Global Gateway partnerships with countries around the world. We want investment in quality infrastructure, connecting people, goods and services around the world. We will take a values-based approach, offering transparency and good governance to our partners. We want to create links and not dependencies. And we know that this can work. 
Since the summer, a new underwater fibre optic cable has connected Brazil to Portugal. We will invest with Africa to create a market for green hydrogen that connects the two shores of the Mediterranean. We need a Team Europe approach to make Global Gateway happen. We will connect institutions and investment, banks and business community. And we will make this a priority for regional summits, starting with the next EU-Africa Summit in February. We want to turn Global Gateway into a trusted brand around the world. 
And let me be very clear about one more point. Doing business around the world is good. Global trade around the world, that is good and necessary. But this can never, ever be done at the expense of people’s dignity and freedom. Today, there are around 25 million people out there who are threatened or coerced into forced labour. We can never accept that they are forced to make products and that these products then end up for sale here in shops in Europe. So we will propose a ban on products in our market that have been made by forced labour, because human rights are not for sale – at any price. 
Human beings are not bargaining chips. Look at what happened at our borders with Belarus. The regime in Minsk has instrumentalised human beings. They have put people on planes and literally pushed them towards Europe’s border. This can never be tolerated. And the quick European reaction shows that. And rest assured, we will continue to stand together with Lithuania, Latvia and Poland. And, let’s call it what it is: this is a hybrid attack to destabilise Europe. We’ll never tolerate that.
These are not isolated events. We saw similar incidents at other borders. And we can expect to see it again. And this is why, as part of our work on Schengen, we will set out new ways to respond to such aggression and ensure unity in protecting our external borders. But as long as we do not find common ground on how to manage migration, our opponents will continue to target this. 
Meanwhile, human traffickers continue to exploit people through deadly routes across the Mediterranean. And these events show us that every country has a stake in building a European migration system. The new pact on migration and asylum gives us everything we need to manage the different types of situations we face. All the elements are there. This is a balanced and humane system that works for all Member States in all circumstances. 
We know that we can find common ground. But in the year since the Commission presented the pact, progress has been painfully slow, and I think this is the moment now for a European migration management policy. So I urge this House and the Member States to speed up the process. 
This ultimately comes down to a question of trust. Trust between Member States. Trust for Europeans that migration can be managed. Trust that Europe will always live up to its enduring duty to the most vulnerable and most in need.
I know that there are many strongly held views on migration in Europe but I believe the common ground is not so far away. Because if you ask most Europeans, they would agree that we should act to curb irregular migration but they would also agree that we have to act to provide a refuge for those forced to flee. They would agree that we should return those who have no right to stay. But they would also agree that we should welcome those who come here legally and make such a vital contribution to our society and our economies. And we should all agree that the topic of migration should never be used to divide us.
I am convinced that there is a way that Europe can build trust amongst us when it comes to migration.
Meine Damen und Herren Abgeordnete! Gesellschaften, die auf Demokratie und gemeinsame Werte bauen, stehen auf einem stabilen Fundament. Sie trauen den Menschen etwas zu. Und so entwickeln sich neue Ideen, so entsteht Veränderung, so überwinden wir Unrecht. Das Vertrauen auf genau diese gemeinsamen Werte, das führte unsere Gründerväter und Gründermütter nach dem Zweiten Weltkrieg zusammen. 
Und es sind genau die gleichen Werte, die die Freiheitskämpfer einten, die vor nun mehr als 30 Jahren den Eisernen Vorhang niederrissen. Sie wollten Demokratie. Sie wollten ihre Regierung frei wählen. Sie wollten den Rechtsstaat, vor Gericht sollen alle gleich sein. Sie wollten der Bespitzelung und staatlichen Spionage ein Ende setzen und die Korruption bekämpfen. Sie wollten die Freiheit, anders zu sein als die Mehrheit. Oder, wie es der ehemalige tschechische Präsident Václav Havel auch so wunderbar auf den Punkt gebracht hat, sie wollten – und ich zitiere – „alle diese großartigen europäischen Werte“. 
Es sind diese Werte, die dem kulturellen, religiösen und humanistischen Erbe Europas entstammen. Sie sind Teil unserer Seele, Teil dessen, was uns heute ausmacht. Und diese Werte sind nun in unseren Europäischen Verträgen verankert. Und wir haben uns alle dazu verpflichtet, sie einzuhalten, als wir als freie und souveräne Staaten Teil dieser Union wurden.
Wir sind entschlossen, diese Werte zu verteidigen. Und wir werden in dieser Entschlossenheit niemals nachlassen. Unsere Werte sind durch unsere Rechtsordnung garantiert, und die Urteile des Europäischen Gerichtshofs sichern sie. Und diese Urteile sind bindend. Und wir achten darauf, dass sie eingehalten werden, und zwar in jedem Mitgliedstaat unserer Union. Denn der Schutz der Rechtsstaatlichkeit ist nicht nur ein nobles Ziel, er ist auch harte Arbeit und ein tägliches Ringen um Verbesserung.
Unsere Berichte zur Rechtsstaatlichkeit sind durch die Reformen ein Teil dieses Prozesses. Ein positives Beispiel dafür sind jetzt die Justizreformen in Malta oder die Korruptionsuntersuchungen in der Slowakei. Und ab 2022 werden diese Berichte zur Rechtsstaatlichkeit zusätzlich konkrete Empfehlungen an die Mitgliedstaaten enthalten.
Trotzdem gibt es in einigen Mitgliedstaaten besorgniserregende Entwicklungen. Und hier ist mir eines wichtig: Am Anfang steht immer der Dialog. Aber der Dialog ist kein Selbstzweck, er muss auch zu einem Ziel führen. Und deshalb verfolgen wir den dualen Ansatz aus Dialog und entschlossenem Handeln. Und genau das haben wir letzte Woche getan, und das werden wir auch weiterhin tun. Denn das Recht auf eine unabhängige Justiz, das Recht, vor dem Gesetz gleich behandelt zu werden, auf diese Rechte müssen sich Menschen verlassen können, und zwar überall in Europa und unabhängig davon, ob sie einer Mehrheit angehören oder einer Minderheit. Das ist die Seele unseres Europas, und die müssen wir verteidigen.
Und, meine Damen und Herren Abgeordnete, der europäische Haushalt ist die in Zahlen gegossene Zukunft unserer Union. Und deshalb muss auch er geschützt werden. Wir müssen dafür sorgen, dass jeder Euro und jeder Cent seinem Zweck zugutekommt und nach rechtsstaatlichen Grundsätzen ausgegeben wird. Investitionen, die unseren Kindern in Zukunft zugutekommen werden, dürfen nicht in finsteren Kanälen verschwinden. Korruption – Korruption bedeutet nicht nur den Diebstahl am Steuerzahler. Korruption bedeutet nicht nur, dass Investoren abgeschreckt werden. Korruption führt dazu, dass großes Geld sich große und kleine Gefälligkeiten kaufen kann und dass die Mächtigen demokratische Regeln aushebeln können. Und wenn es um den Schutz unseres Budgets geht, werden wir jeden Fall verfolgen, mit allem, was in unserer Macht steht, und in Kürze damit beginnen.
Meine Damen und Herren Abgeordnete, wenn wir unsere Werte verteidigen, dann verteidigen wir auch die Freiheit. Die Freiheit, zu sein, wer man ist, die Freiheit, zu sagen, was einem durch den Kopf geht, die Freiheit, zu lieben, wen man will. Freiheit bedeutet aber auch die Freiheit von Angst. Während der Pandemie wurden zu viele Frauen dieser Freiheit beraubt. Es muss eine besonders schreckliche Zeit für diejenigen gewesen sein, die sich nirgendwo verstecken konnten, die nirgendwo vor ihren Peinigern fliehen konnten. Wir müssen Licht in dieses Dunkel bringen. Wir müssen Wege aus dem Schmerz aufzeigen, ihre Peiniger müssen vor Gericht gestellt werden. Und diese Frauen müssen wieder frei und selbstbestimmt leben können.
Wir werden deshalb bis Ende des Jahres ein Gesetz zur Bekämpfung von Gewalt gegen Frauen auf den Weg bringen. Es geht um wirksame Strafverfolgung, um Prävention und Schutz, online wie offline. Es geht um die Würde jeder Einzelnen, und es geht um Gerechtigkeit. Und auch das ist die Seele Europas. Und dafür werden wir kämpfen.
Meine Damen und Herren Abgeordnete, lassen Sie uns zum Schluss auf eine Freiheit blicken, die allen anderen Freiheiten eine Stimme gibt – und das ist die Medienfreiheit. Journalistinnen und Journalisten werden angegriffen, einfach nur, weil sie ihre Arbeit machen. Einige werden bedroht und verprügelt, andere tragischerweise ermordet – mitten in unserer Union. Ich möchte hier einige Namen nennen: Daphne Caruana Galizia, Ján Kuciak, Peter de Vries. Ihre Geschichten mögen sich in den Details unterscheiden. Doch eines ist ihnen gemeinsam: Sie haben für unser Recht auf Information gekämpft, und dafür sind sie gestorben.
Information ist ein öffentliches Gut. Wir müssen diejenigen schützen, die Transparenz schaffen: die Journalistinnen und Journalisten. Und deshalb haben wir heute eine Empfehlung zum besseren Schutz von Journalistinnen und Journalisten vorgelegt. Und wir müssen denjenigen Einhalt gebieten, die die Medienfreiheit bedrohen. Medienhäuser sind nicht einfach x-beliebige Wirtschaftsunternehmen. Ihre Unabhängigkeit ist essenziell, und deshalb braucht Europa ein Gesetz, das diese Unabhängigkeit sichert. Und genau ein solches Medienfreiheitsgesetz werden wir im nächsten Jahr vorlegen. Denn wenn wir die Freiheit der Medien verteidigen, dann verteidigen wir auch unsere Demokratie.
Honourable Members, strengthening Schuman’s European ideal that I invoked earlier is a continuous work. And we should not hide away from our inconsistencies and imperfections. But imperfect as we might be, our Union is both beautifully unique and uniquely beautiful. It is a Union where we strengthen our individual liberty through the strength of our community. A Union shaped as much by our shared history and values as by our different cultures and perspectives. It is a Union with a soul.
Trying to find the right words to capture the essence of this feeling is not easy. But it is easier when you borrow them from someone who inspires you. And this is why I have invited a guest of honour to be with us today. Many of you might know her – a gold medallist from Italy who captured my heart this summer.
But what you might not know is that only in April she was told her life was in peril. She went through surgery, she fought back, she recovered. And only 119 days after she left the hospital, she won Paralympic gold.
Honourable Members, please join me in welcoming Bebe Vio.
(sustained applause)
Bebe has overcome so much, so young. Her story is one of rising against all odds. Of succeeding thanks to talent, tenacity and unrelenting positivity. She is the image of her generation, a leader and an advocate for the causes she believes in. And she has managed to achieve all of that by living up to her belief that, if it seems impossible, then it can be done. Se sembra impossibile, allora si può fare.
(applause)
And this was the spirit of European founders and this is the spirit of Europe’s next generation. So let’s be inspired by Bebe and by all the young people who change our perception of the possible. Who show us that you can be what you want to be and that you can achieve whatever you believe in.
Honourable Members, that is the soul of Europe. That is the future of Europe. Let’s make it stronger.
Viva l’Europa!
(applause)"};"There is no mention of electric vehicles in the provided speech. The speech focuses on topics such as women's rights, media freedom, and European values, but does not touch upon electric vehicles or any related issues."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2021-09-15_2-3";"Manfred Weber";"EPP";"on behalf of the PPE Group. – Madam President, debating the State of the Union means today the first focus on what the pandemic has brought. Not everything went well and smoothly, but all in all, Europe has managed the crisis well. No other continent has developed a vaccine of a better quality. No other continent has a higher vaccination rate. No other continent has shown more solidarity and willingness to help each other, and no other continent has provided other parts of the world with more vaccines than we have.
All Europe is proud of our everyday heroes, the doctors and nurses, researchers and many others, and we thank them for their contribution. The crisis defence began in China. In Europe, we found the solutions. We can be proud about what Europeans achieved in the past.
When we look now what is in front of us, there are two main issues. We are emerging stronger from the crisis, but this crisis has caused and left deep social and economic wounds. Many people fear for their existence, for their jobs. Only if we create jobs, then we can secure our prosperity and we can care about the weakest in our society and we will defend the European way of life.
Alongside the Green Deal, we are thinking as EPP that now is also the time for a Jobs Deal. In addition to this, after Afghanistan, we now really need a common foreign and defence policy. Joe Biden is clear, the US is no longer a world policeman. But where is Europe? Russia and China are just waiting to fill the vacuum, and that would be fatal for the future. We would wake up in a world in which we and also our children will not want to live. 
Based on these two points, I want to make very concrete proposals for what we have to do now. Firstly, the rapid development of a vaccine was only possible because the authorities worked quickly during the approval process. That is what the BioNTech founders told us, no blockades. But this speed is what we also need now in other fields of the research sector and in the investments for the climate protection. With an immediate action plan for cutting bureaucracies in the European Union, we should work together with all stakeholders to identify 300 EU regulations that we will abolish or simplify in the next 12 months.
Secondly, for the production of an electric car, only half the number of employees is needed. Many industrial jobs in the European Union are under threat. New jobs are urgently needed in today’s European Union. International trade was and is a job machine. Why not now pick up this debate with our American friends? Let us negotiate an EU-US trade emergency programme on the mobility sector, on mechanical engineering in the digital economy as soon as possible, as a first step for a broader comprehensive trade agreement. And only this will be the way to strengthen the Western economy, key industrial sectors. And together we can protect ourselves against China. The European Union and the US together represent 50% of the global economy. Together, we can start the growth machine that benefits the whole world.
Thirdly, the pandemic has shown us how important the health sector is. The coming decade will bring a wave of innovation in medicine. We can beat cancer. I want Europe to create 10 million new jobs in the next four years with an immediate innovation offensive in this field. At the beginning of the digitalisation 20 years ago, we, as Europeans, overslept the innovation on internet and jobs were created in the US and in China. Today, neither the Chinese nor the Americans are ahead with the COVID vaccines, but we are. So let us use our know-how right now.
Fourthly, Defence. We and I fully welcome the initiatives from Ursula von der Leyen today and also the decision of the Defence Council in Ljubljana. But, what are we waiting for? The Lisbon Treaty gives us all options if we want to create a reaction force. So let’s do it and let us do it now. 
Fifthly, Global responsibility. Some 15 000 children die of hunger worldwide every day. The everyday horror, and we hardly speak about it. The weakest suffer most from the COVID crisis. That is why we must reallocate and free up funds. Like we are doing in Afghanistan now. To invest, we need to stop the silent and daily mass deaths in this world. 
Finally, without law and security, the rest means nothing. That is why we stand for a robust application of the rule of law mechanism inside of the European Union, but that is not enough. Cross-border tax fraud, money laundering and criminal organisations, mafia make its way through our societies, and the terrorist threat is still high in Europe. Why don’t we finally transform Europol into a real European FBI? The European Commission should present in the next 12 months a legislative package to strengthen security in the European Union.
Ursula von der Leyen was clear that we can lead the world with the Green Deal. I want to put on the table that we have to have the same ambitions now for new jobs, for our international responsibility and for security. Let’s do it."};"According to the speech, something related to electric vehicles is mentioned in the following context:

""...for the production of an electric car, only half the number of employees is needed. Many industrial jobs in the European Union are under threat. New jobs are urgently needed in today’s European Union.""

This sentence suggests that the production of electric cars requires fewer employees compared to traditional industries, which could lead to job losses and threats to existing employment. The speaker proposes creating new jobs in other sectors, such as international trade, to mitigate this issue.

No further information about electric vehicles is mentioned in the speech."};0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2021-10-06_4-52";"Niels Fuglsang";"S&D";" – Mr. President! Rising energy prices and especially gas prices are affecting consumers across Europe. The Spaniard who has bought an electric car and plugs it in. The Romanian who needs to heat their house. The Dane who turns on the meat grill. We find ourselves in a situation that can become fatal, and in some cases it means choosing between heating your home or having a warm evening meal. It is of course completely unsustainable. We have a market, but it's not self-evident that everyone plays fair on the market. I mean that the European Commission must have a serious conversation with Russia, because why does the import of Russian gas fall when we have the greatest need for it and when we are willing to pay for it? The EU must make higher demands, strengthen market rules, and ensure that those who produce the gas do not use it politically.
    I mean first and foremost that this crisis shows that we need a strong green transition. This crisis is not due to too much green transition, but rather too little. Therefore, it seems strange to me to hear from colleagues who blame the Green Agreement for being responsible for this situation. On the contrary. We must increase renewable energy, because it is cheapest, and we must increase energy efficiency. Every time we increase energy efficiency by one percent, gas imports fall by 2.6 percent. So let's take this as a sign that we need to make a strong deal on the Fit for 55 package under the Green Agreement."};"According to the speech, one of the individuals mentioned as being affected by rising energy prices is ""The Spaniard who has bought an electric car and plugs it in."" This is the only mention of electric vehicles in the text. It implies that this individual has purchased an electric vehicle and uses it, but does not provide any further information about electric vehicles or their role in addressing the energy crisis."};0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2021-10-19_12-24";"Henna Virkkunen";"EPP";" – Dear Mr. Speaker, dear Commissioner, the green transition requires huge investments from industry and society. The Commission estimates that even just achieving the climate targets for 2030 will require 350 billion euros in investments per year. This means that industry, businesses, and especially SMEs need support for this major shift.
    
    I welcome the proposals from the Commission, which suggest that subsidies would be expanded, among other things, to clean transportation. It is also particularly important now to direct support towards improving the energy efficiency of buildings and enhancing combined heat production. This demonstrates the current crisis in many countries due to the high costs of energy. Instead of providing assistance to individual gas consumers, it is much more effective to significantly reform both energy efficiency and the entire heating system. Companies involved in this should receive support without further ado, and I particularly appreciate that SMEs are proposed to be offered subsidies in many respects."};"According to the speech, something related to ""clean transportation"" is mentioned as one of the areas where subsidies would be expanded. This implies that electric vehicles are part of the ""clean transportation"" category, but it does not provide any specific details about electric vehicles.

In summary, the text mentions that the Commission's proposals suggest expanding subsidies to ""clean transportation"", which likely includes electric vehicles, but no further information is provided about electric vehicles in the speech."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;
"2021-10-19_16-14";"Mislav Kolakušić";"NI";" – Madam President, esteemed colleagues, esteemed citizens, we all agree that the right to a clean environment is a prerequisite for a healthy life of citizens. However, what we do not agree on and perhaps have different views on is how to achieve this. 
Many citizens believe that the story about energy production and consumption that we have today and promote within the European Union is not on healthy foundations. Today we have a situation where a person, a citizen of the European Union, uses a 60W incandescent bulb and is considered an enemy of humanity, while another person who drives an electric car that consumes 100 kW of the same electrical energy is considered a hero, and the poorest must help him buy this vehicle and donate 10,000 euros to it. 
This is unfair and I do not know what else to say."};"According to the speech, an electric car that consumes 100 kW of electrical energy is considered a ""hero"". Additionally, it is mentioned that the poorest citizens are expected to help someone buy this vehicle and donate €10,000 to it. The speaker criticizes this situation as unfair."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;
"2021-10-20_5-33";"Sylvia Limmer";"ID";"
    Mr. President! In two weeks, politicians and a constantly growing self-proclaimed climate elite will meet again to combat the self-proclaimed disasters with words and lots of money. In an unparalleled, mad travel spectacle, people come together from all corners of the earth using the evil CO2 – which they would naturally want to ban there. They regulate citizens, be it in transportation, housing, eating, and - not to be forgotten - in the new green thinking.
    But have you ever wondered at some point whether you have the right to imagine that your concerns and your supposedly urgent travel activities are more important than the journey to work of a father, a mother who, by the way, finances your concerns and your trip?
    In Glasgow, 240-ton electric super-SUVs will be available for you to feel better. Unfortunately, there are no charging stations, so generators are being brought in that are supposed to run on hydrogenated French fries fat - at least that's the plan. Two years ago in Madrid: behind huge exhibition halls, mountainous heaps of waste, in which your woke climate feast was previously wrapped. Your Pippi Longstocking climate world fails simply because of nasty realities, but it costs the taxpayer record prices that you don't even shave. The fuel supply ultimately takes care of the trip.
    It's time for you to pay the price of your own poison. Stay at home, turn off the heating and feed yourself vegan on domestic field fruits, which were harvested by woke under the moonlight. That would be a start - instead of distributing billions in tax money all over the world in Glasgow."};"According to the speech, in Glasgow, ""240-ton electric super-SUVs"" will be available for people to use. However, it's mentioned that there are no charging stations, so generators will be brought in to power these vehicles. The generators are planned to run on hydrogenated French fries fat.

That's all the information about electric vehicles mentioned in the text."};0;0;0;0;1;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2021-10-21_8-5";"Tsvetelina Penkova";"S&D";"on behalf of the S&D Group. – Mr President, dear Commissioner, dear Ms Charanzová, first of all, I would like to thank you for the hard work and also to thank all the fellow shadow rapporteurs who’ve been working hard on this file and our respective teams.
In May 2018, the European Commission proposed to amend the Motor Insurance Directive in five main areas. The first one was the insolvency of the issuer, where it was proposed to create a mechanism ensuring compensation of injured parties in case of insolvency. The second area was the right of the policyholder to obtain the statement of their claims issued in the past five years. The third was to introduce checks against insured drivers. The fourth was to set up an obligatory minimum amount of the cover provided by the insurance policies, where the Member States could add up and require a higher amount on a national level. And the final area was the clarification of the scope of the directive in line with the recent Court of Justice of the European Union rulings.
The negotiations on the file were marked by the COVID—19 pandemic and lasted almost two years. However, I believe that together with my colleagues, we did manage to achieve several important changes in the interests of all the EU citizens. We, as S&D, did manage to deliver on several key priorities.
The first one I would like to mention is that compensation to road accident victims is guaranteed even in case of the insolvency of the insurance company. This will ensure that we would not allow legal chaos to happen, even in the case of bankruptcy of any given insurance company. Each Member State is required to set up a body to compensate the insured injured parties for damage caused by vehicles when there is insolvency of the insurer.
A second S&D priority that we fought very hard for was to exclude the new forms of sustainable transportation solutions like e—bikes and scooters from the scope of the directive. We believe that only by using such innovative solutions can we reduce the greenhouse gas emissions and reduce the carbon footprint. Therefore, we need to encourage by all means necessary, the usage of such alternative transportation solutions, and they shouldn’t be in the scope of that directive.
Finally, another important aspect for us was the claim history statement. Insurers should not treat their policy-holders in any discriminatory manner based on their nationality or based on their previous Member States’ residency. We don’t believe that this should be tolerated or find any place in the directive, and we managed to achieve that. 
In that matter, I would like to urge you to vote in favour of the outcome of the trilogue because the EU consumers deserve a well—functioning single market that does not discriminate them but provides fair compensation for all."};"According to the speech, the S&D Group fought hard to exclude ""new forms of sustainable transportation solutions like e-bikes and scooters"" from the scope of the Motor Insurance Directive. This means that electric bicycles (e-bikes) and scooters are considered innovative, environmentally friendly alternatives to traditional vehicles, and the group wants to encourage their use by not including them in the directive's scope.

In other words, the text does not mention electric vehicles specifically, but rather e-bikes and scooters as examples of sustainable transportation solutions that should be exempt from the directive."};0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2021-10-21_8-10";"Róża Thun und Hohenstein";"EPP";" – Madam President! I am very pleased that, finally, an agreement has been reached on this directive, because insurance against civil liability for damages resulting from the movement of mechanical vehicles is a topic that has warmed up the discussion for many years. And special congratulations to Ms. Dita and all the rapporteurs, to the Commission, that an agreement has been reached, which I know was difficult. I remember the discussion on this matter about 13 years ago, when I started working in the European Parliament. Then unfortunately, the Council blocked these works for a good few years.
    Today we make some progress, but the fact that we harmonize some regulations and regulate issues of some single-track electric vehicles is still not enough. Because let's be honest, it's necessary to honestly say that we do not solve the fundamental problem that concerns many consumers: it will still not be possible to conclude an insurance contract for a car in one Member State of the Union and use it freely in other countries.
    I know that this is due to the resistance of the Council, citizens will still not be able to fully benefit from our common European market. To this matter we will have to return and I hope, believe that we will do it in the near future."};"According to the speech, the following point is mentioned regarding electric vehicles:

* The agreement reached on the directive harmonizes some regulations and regulates issues related to single-track electric vehicles.

That's the only mention of electric vehicles in the text."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;
"2021-10-21_8-13";"Alessandro Panza";"ID";" – Mr. President, Madam Commissioner, esteemed colleagues, I would like to thank the rapporteur for the work done. We from our group are often critical and caustic even in our criticisms, but we recognize when a job is well done, and especially when it is done for the good of European citizens who benefit from these agreements.
    We can therefore say that we are substantially satisfied with the result, because the scope of application of the legislation has been clarified, so electric vehicles and electric scooters will also be regulated, although there could be some room for improvement in this regard. In Italy, there is a debate on regulating from an insurance point of view, for example, electric monowheels or anything that does not have so-called muscle traction. Everything that has assisted electric traction should somehow be regulated from an insurance point of view.
    It is important to note the increase in protection for injured people, even in the event of accidents involving vehicles from another country, foreign vehicles. For those coming from border territories like me, these things unfortunately happen quite frequently, so it is an important point.
    We say that the most important thing about this provision, however, remains the protection of citizens, especially with regard to harmonizing minimum amounts, as well as the protection of guarantees for companies that fail, which nevertheless allow European citizens to find redress, to find satisfaction when they are victims of an accident. Anyone who suffers damage must be compensated, must be satisfied.
    As for the work on reducing road traffic accident victims, there is still a lot of work to be done, but I am sure that we will all actively engage in this."};"According to the speech, electric vehicles are mentioned as being regulated by the legislation. Specifically, it is stated that ""electric vehicles and electric scooters will also be regulated"" under the new agreement. This means that the legislation aims to cover not only traditional vehicles but also alternative modes of transportation like electric vehicles and scooters.

Additionally, there is a mention of Italy's debate on regulating electric monowheels or other assisted electric traction vehicles from an insurance point of view."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;
"2021-10-21_8-19";"Antonius Manders";"EPP";" – Chairman, Commissioner, all praise, especially to Dita Charanzová, that this has been achieved after so many years. It is a great compromise and it is good that the Member States also support it. Free movement of persons in the European Union is a very great good and this can be significantly improved with this directive. It is good that insured parties are protected in the event of bankruptcy of the insurer. It is good that there are minimum coverage amounts, that they have been updated, and it is good that it is clear what happens in the event of accidents on a construction site. Once again, congratulations to everyone who has contributed!
    However, governing is anticipating, Commissioner, so I would like to give some points to take into account for a next revision. For example, I think we should abandon a directive and strive for a regulation. The rapporteur said: ""We hope for the sound judgment of the Member States."" But if it is a regulation, then it is fully harmonized legislation. And in particular with cross-border traffic, I think, that is very important.
    In some cases now, a number of vehicles are not included in the insurance, for example an electric bicycle, but you will be run over by a pedestrian by an electric bicycle and that person is not insured. How do we deal with this in the future? I understand that, it are small things, but since we use more and more electric vehicles, both large and small, it is reason for research.
    A important issue is if there is damage on motorways. Then you see that drivers panic. Who is liable? And thus enormous traffic jams arise. It would be good – and perhaps that you can investigate this, Commissioner – if insurers were to abandon the reduction of no-claim in damage on motorways and also their own risk, so that vehicles can be removed from the road more quickly, because the people who are stuck in the queue are also consumers. They are also citizens of Europe. And that damage is many times higher. I think insurers can find a solution for this.
    Finally, but not least, in the Netherlands we know a digital app for mobile damage reporting. It would be good to introduce this European, so that processing can take place faster than it happens now. Because processing on paper, that time is over."};"According to the speech, electric vehicles are mentioned twice:

1. The speaker mentions that ""in some cases now, a number of vehicles are not included in the insurance, for example an electric bicycle"". This implies that electric bicycles are currently not covered by insurance policies.
2. The speaker notes that ""we use more and more electric vehicles, both large and small"" and suggests that this trend is a reason to research how to deal with these vehicles in the future.

That's all the information about electric vehicles mentioned in the speech."};0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2021-10-21_8-20";"Leszek Miller";"S&D";"
    Madam President! The implementation of the said directive aims to harmonize national legislation on civil liability of drivers and the rules for its enforcement. Thanks to it, citizens will be able to travel throughout the Union without having to purchase additional insurance based on a single contribution. The directive simplifies the functioning of the single market, but will also make a significant contribution to strengthening the protection of accident victims, as Member States will be obliged to establish guarantee funds paying compensation to victims in the event of the insurer's insolvency, accidents caused by uninsured or unidentified vehicles.
    Today's debate concludes a long, over two-year negotiation period with the Council. I believe that the Parliament has managed to develop a good compromise taking into account most of our amendments proposed in the Commission's proposal. Noteworthy is the exclusion of light electric vehicles from the directive, the introduction of exceptions for temporarily withdrawn vehicles from operation, and the completion of regulations with criteria that online insurance comparison tools must meet to be certified by Member States. I believe that the directive in its current form will adequately achieve its goals, ensuring a high level of protection for accident victims and facilitating the free movement of persons and vehicles within the Union. Taking this into account, Parliament should vote in favor of adopting the negotiated text of the directive.
    Thank you to everyone who achieved a negotiation success."};"According to the speech, ""light electric vehicles"" are excluded from the directive being discussed. This means that the directive does not apply to light electric vehicles, and they are not subject to the same rules and regulations as other vehicles.

In summary, the text mentions that light electric vehicles are exempt from the directive's scope, but it does not provide any further information about electric vehicles or their characteristics."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2021-11-11_3-9";"Geert Bourgeois";"ECR";"
    On behalf of the ECR Group. - Mr. President, I am very pleased with the results of the first meeting of the EU-US Trade and Technology Council and would therefore like to congratulate the Commission on this explicitly.
    I am a strong supporter of the Trade and Technology Council: we must strive to set global standards together as the EU and US. This is a great challenge. The Chinese standardization is currently advancing full steam ahead. If we do not set the tone, others will do so. Mr. Dombrovskis, this must indeed happen based on our shared values, and that will not always be easy. On the one hand, we have the US, which has a huge lead in terms of data and also has a unified capital market, with hardly any regulations and plenty of room for experimentation, and on the other hand, the EU, which not only struggles with a considerable lag but also tends to want to regulate too much. The Commission must therefore establish encouraging regulation without unnecessary obstacles.
    Furthermore, I agree with Mr. Dombrovskis's aim for an intensified partnership. We must put all problems on the table: the protectionist ""Buy American Act"", the ""Jones Act"" and also the threatening taxes on electric vehicles. A sustainable partnership must be based on openness and equal footing.
    Finally, I call for going beyond legislative dialogue and striving for the establishment of a genuine trans-Atlantic parliamentary cooperation."};"According to the speech, it is mentioned that there are ""threatening taxes on electric vehicles"". This is one of the issues that the speaker calls for putting ""on the table"" as part of an intensified partnership between the EU and US. The mention of these taxes implies that they are a concern or a potential obstacle to cooperation in this area."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;
"2021-11-22_18-2";"Hildegard Bentele";"NA";"
    Madam President, distinguished Mr. Commissioner, dear colleagues! We are discussing a European strategy for critical raw materials this week and will take our final decision on it. My group, the EPP, has deliberately taken the initiative to bring this issue into Parliament - because we are convinced that this is an essential, strategic issue for the European Union, in which all institutions - the Commission, the Parliament, the Council - but also the Member States and financial and research institutions must pull together more closely. Only then will we achieve our common goal, the Green Deal, which includes compliance with the Paris climate targets as well as maintaining our competitiveness and jobs in Europe.
    
    We are not talking about cocoa and coffee, which one can, albeit with difficulty, do without. We are talking about rare earths: lithium, borate, bauxite, tantalum, and further 25 critical minerals that are essential for renewable energy technologies, for more energy efficiency, for electric mobility, for more digital applications, and for better medical care.
    
    We are highly dependent on a few or even just one supplier country or company for these raw materials. This year we have tightened our climate goals for 2030: climate neutrality by no later than 2050 is set. Against this background, all studies and forecasts assume that we will need much more of these critical raw materials in Europe very quickly for the green and digital transformation. It is therefore high time to review our supply chains and stabilize them.
    
    The Commission has proposed ten measures, which I wholeheartedly welcome. But they are not enough, and that's why I propose to supplement them: The European Raw Materials Alliance must be further strengthened, and its projects in the field of permanent magnets must now be implemented, as well as supporting new initiatives in the areas of storage and recycling.
    
    My social democratic colleague Chahim also considered better coordination of national raw materials activities through a new strategic working group important, I am happy to take up this concern.
    
    We need above all clear positive signals for the financing of sustainable raw material projects: in national reconstruction plans, in taxonomy, for investments in the establishment of recycling and secondary markets, for projects in former mining regions, in materials research, and for an IPCEI, an important project of common European interest.
    
    In addition, we need faster and more transparent approval procedures and instead of new ones, the enforcement of existing European legislation. Of course, we must fully exploit the potential of the circular economy: from product design to waste collection, through strict control of our waste exports, through recycling quotas, reducing the material footprint overall. Colleague Matthieu from the Environment Committee has made important contributions in this regard.
    
    Just as colleagues from the Trade Committee, who have supported the establishment of new strategic partnerships, the review of our trade agreements, and insisting on sustainable mining measures in third countries through the introduction of due diligence requirements.
    
    Unfortunately, a fundamental conflict has remained until the end, and this concerns the question of whether we in Europe are ready to contribute to the coverage of the great additional need for critical raw materials with European mining projects under high environmental and social standards and high technical requirements in order to at least provide a little more independence for our industry from unpredictable third countries. 
    We in the EPP clearly say yes to this. Resource deposits are where they are in the ground. We are firmly convinced that we can and must resolve conflicts of interest between nature conservation and economic activity using our European regulations, because permanent outsourcing of responsibility abroad and current constant blackmailing and uncertainty over prices, shortages and supply chains are simply no longer an option. Our Green Deal must be industrially, environmentally, strategically and ethically based on solid ground. With our EPP amendments, we make this raw materials report a significant contribution to this. Please vote in favor of them!"};"According to the speech, electric mobility is mentioned as one of the areas where critical raw materials are essential. The speaker states that these raw materials are necessary for ""electric mobility"" alongside renewable energy technologies, energy efficiency, digital applications, and better medical care.

In other words, the text suggests that electric vehicles require certain rare earths and minerals to function, which is why they are considered a strategic issue in the context of the European Union's Green Deal."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;
"2021-11-22_18-8";"Henrike Hahn";"Greens/EFA";"
    On behalf of the Verts/ALE Group. – Mr President! Europe needs raw materials for the transition to a climate-neutral economy. The use of critical raw materials in green technologies also has positive effects on the environment. Lithium and cobalt in batteries, for example, enable electromobility and contribute to the transport revolution.
    We also know that mining for raw materials is a risk for people on site, for biodiversity, and for the climate. Calling for more mining in Europe is wrong. The European Commission knows this, as do my colleagues in the European Parliament.
    The required quantities of critical raw materials for the green transformation in Europe are often overestimated and are based on false assumptions. Green technologies are responsible for increased demand for only six out of a total of 30 critical raw materials, and the digitalization of the economy, defense, and aviation industries are also major consumers.
    Artificially high forecasts for the extraction volume of critical raw materials often lead to wrong conclusions. This is fatal for our industrial strategy, but also for achieving our climate, environmental, and social goals. And if we now promote raw materials in Natura-2000 areas and other protected areas, this undermines EU environmental protection within the framework of the Green Deal.
    We need sustainable procedures that are socially acceptable. We must move towards a circular economy and substitution and to a functioning market for recycled raw materials. Green innovation in industry, new production technologies, resource conservation, and resource efficiency – that is the right path for a transition to a climate-neutral economy."};"According to the speech, lithium and cobalt are mentioned as critical raw materials used in batteries that enable electromobility and contribute to the transport revolution. This implies that electric vehicles (EVs) are being referred to, specifically their reliance on these two key minerals for battery production.

In summary:

* Lithium and cobalt are essential components of EV batteries.
* These minerals play a crucial role in enabling electromobility and contributing to the transport revolution.
* The speech does not provide further details about electric vehicles beyond this mention."};0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2021-11-22_18-10";"Grzegorz Tobiszowski";"ECR";"
    On behalf of the ECR group. - Madam President! Madam Commissioner! We have adopted new climate goals, we reached an agreement in Glasgow. In practice, this means more renewable energy sources, investments in improving energy efficiency, and the development of electromobility. That is why raw materials, both critical and basic, are so important.
    And well that we talk about it today and discuss it. The numbers show that as the European Union - and this has already been said - we are very dependent on third countries. For example, in the case of lithium, China's share is 55%, while China's share in cobalt is 65% and almost 90% in the case of rare earth elements. Examples can be multiplied, and this has significance in the context of investments, for example, in electric cars, batteries, and many other ecological initiatives.
    Should we really on such a scale obtain raw materials from outside the European Union? Should we not engage to support our sources, our mining companies, and our metallurgy industry to supply demand for raw materials and at the same time develop this range of economy and industry in Europe? I think we should very strongly see and responsibly connect climate policy with industry."};"According to the speech, electromobility (the development of electric vehicles) is mentioned as one of the areas that will benefit from the agreement reached in Glasgow. The speaker notes that investments are needed in electric cars, batteries, and other ecological initiatives.

Additionally, the speaker questions whether it's wise to rely heavily on third countries for raw materials needed for electric vehicles, such as lithium, cobalt, and rare earth elements, which are currently dominated by China. They suggest that instead of relying on external sources, Europe should support its own mining companies, metallurgy industry, and economy to supply demand for these raw materials and develop the industry domestically."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;
"2021-11-22_18-14";"Jessica Stegrud";"ECR";"
    Mr. President! Our geostrategic dependence on China is already very large today. China, for example, accounts for 98 percent of the EU's demand for rare earth metals and controls to a large extent the trade in cobalt for electric car batteries. The new climate goals and massive investments in e-mobility and weather-dependent energy will further increase this dependence.
    It is becoming increasingly clear that China is the big winner in the EU's climate transition, as we are already seeing effects of the EU's ambitious plans in the form of rising energy prices, inflation, weaker competitiveness, and increased dependence on the outside world, while China both increases its emissions and consolidates its geopolitical position regarding access to raw materials and manufacturing of vital components. I am forced to reiterate that the transformation, according to the Commission, which should make us successful and independent of dictatorships, lacks adequate impact assessments. It is high time to rethink."};"According to the speech, China controls the trade in cobalt for electric car batteries to a large extent. Additionally, it is mentioned that there will be massive investments in e-mobility (electric mobility) as part of the EU's climate goals.

In summary, the text states that:

* China has control over the trade in cobalt for electric car batteries.
* The EU plans to invest heavily in e-mobility (electric vehicles) as part of its climate goals."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;
"2021-11-22_18-18";"Anna-Michelle Asimakopoulou";"EPP";"in writing. – We have had plenty of opportunities in recent times to reconsider what is truly ‘critical’. It is ‘critical’ to have a ‘Green Deal’ to deal with the inevitable consequences of climate change and global warming. It is ‘critical’ to deal with the transition to the digital age, after the fourth industrial revolution. It is ‘critical’ to deal with the consequences of COVID-19 and future pandemics. It is clear that we cannot deal with these ‘critical’ matters, without ‘critical raw materials.’ We need ‘critical raw materials’ like lithium for batteries, magnesium for light-weight vehicle concepts, permanent magnets for wind turbines, for electric vehicles, for communication devices. Very few people realise how many critical raw materials are in their mobile phones! It is now ‘critical’ that we reduce our reliance on a handful of non-EU countries by supporting sustainable investments that involve European and global partners and SMEs as part of a long-term international sourcing strategy. We need to take back control of critical materials’ supply chains. We need to control waste streams and exports of waste products. In summary, we need to realise that ‘critical raw materials’ are today more ‘critical’ than ever and more importantly, we need to act accordingly."};"According to the speech, it is mentioned that lithium is needed for batteries, magnesium is needed for light-weight vehicle concepts, and permanent magnets are needed for electric vehicles. This indicates that the speaker is highlighting the importance of ""critical raw materials"" such as lithium, magnesium, and permanent magnets in the production of electric vehicles.

In summary, the text mentions that:

* Electric vehicles require certain critical raw materials like lithium, magnesium, and permanent magnets.
* These materials are essential for the production of electric vehicles."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;
"2021-11-24_3-16";"Silvia Sardone";"ID";" - Mr. President, esteemed colleagues, the Glasgow conference has brought results, let's say frankly, disappointing.
    It must be clear: environmental protection is an absolute priority, but the ecological challenge must be faced with pragmatism and seriousness, not at all with ideology. The green transition, as imagined by the European Commission, has costs that are often not considered.
    The European race towards climate neutrality, not accompanied by that of giants like Russia, China, India, and to some extent also the United States, risks being a burden only for our continent. We remember that Europe has a share of only 7% of global emissions.
    It may be the European taxpayers who pay the bill for wrong choices, and in particular the less affluent classes, as we have already seen in France with expensive gasoline. At the same time, the increase in energy costs with dramatic effects on bills is partly linked to certain green decisions. These meetings where hundreds of leaders arrive by plane risk objectively being the fair of hypocrisy and unfulfilled promises.
    We must not forget that China is already leader of many of the products of future raw materials. I think of lithium for electric vehicle batteries, essential semi-metals for wind turbines and even solar panels. In short, our productions risk being penalized by unsustainable constraints and becoming completely dependent on the giant Chinese.
    The environment must be protected at all costs, but we must have the foresight to calculate the social and economic consequences of the choices we will make. The risk is to witness further delocalizations and new layoffs."};"According to the speech, lithium is mentioned as an essential semi-metal for electric vehicle batteries. This is stated in the following sentence:

""I think of lithium for electric vehicle batteries, essential semi-metals for wind turbines and even solar panels.""

This means that lithium is a crucial component for the production of electric vehicle batteries, which are used to power electric vehicles."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;1;0;
"2021-11-24_3-52";"Ivan Štefanec";"EPP";" – Mr President, protecting the environment for future generations is one of the key challenges ahead of us. The most challenging task will be to find ways to protect the environment in a way that will boost our economy, employment and social care. 
The environmental agenda is stronger every day and I believe that the organisation of the Glasgow Summit is really a success of our European policy. This is the most important message. There are also three good messages, in my view. The first one is that the Glasgow Agreement has been signed by 151 countries. The second one is that countries also agreed to a robust process to develop a new and larger climate finance goal to come into effect after 2025. Thirdly, finance. There is a significant milestone to address this issue. The Adaptation Fund reached an unprecedented level of contributions, with new pledges for USD 356 million that represent almost three times its mobilisation targets for 2022. 
On the other hand, there are very high expectations and there are still challenges remaining. The first one is coal. Many countries will phase out coal by 2030, but the world’s largest users of the fuel, like China, India and the United States of America, will not do so. Secondly, transportation. Better investment for sustainable transport modes was not forced in Glasgow. There is still a lack of focus on public transport and cycling. Thirdly, fossil fuels. The subsidisation of fossil fuels, the largest source of global greenhouse gas emissions, was opposed by several countries with large fossil-fuel based economic sectors. 
Glasgow clearly showed that the democratic world is trying to address and solve the issues, while the non-democratic one is still waiting. We can really be leaders and represent the green transformation for the rest of the world."};"The text does not mention electric vehicles directly. However, it mentions ""sustainable transport modes"" as one of the areas where better investment was expected but not forced during the Glasgow Summit. Additionally, it notes that there is still a lack of focus on public transport and cycling.

It can be inferred that sustainable transport modes may include electric vehicles, but this is not explicitly stated in the text. The text does not provide any specific information about electric vehicles or their role in achieving a green transformation."};0;0;0;0;1;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2021-11-24_13-21";"Philippe Olivier";"ID";" – Mr. President, Ladies and Gentlemen, in matters of energy, we can at least recognize the European Union's merit for continuity, continuity in error.
    At the method level, you proceed by objectives, in the form of ultimatums, without considering the pathways, the economic balances, the stories of each country. You accompany your instructions with overly restrictive deadlines and thus impose on individuals or states the threat of unfair retaliation. As usual, you wield the fiscal weapon, regardless of whether it affects first the working classes in our countries, who are already heavily burdened by the laundering of globalization. Not everyone has the means to afford an electric car, cars that are otherwise ill-suited to rural areas.
    On the substance, you continue the destruction of our landscapes with your wind turbines, on land or at sea, for intermittent, evanescent, exorbitant energy, and ultimately, due to the difficulty of recycling the life of installations, polluting. And then there is the question of nuclear power, a decarbonized energy if it is, which proponents of coal in Germany would like, out of pure ideology, to deny France and Germany. This religious excommunication prevents our countries from having access to their power and energy independence. We have, with French nuclear power, an excellent line that provides affordable, constant, clean electricity that can extend towards decarbonated hydrogen when you are stuck with renewable hydrogen.
    In such an important file for the future of Europe, decidedly, you remain prisoners of your ideological whims."};"According to the speech, it is mentioned that not everyone has the means to afford an electric car. This implies that electric cars are considered a luxury item or something that only certain people can afford. Additionally, it is stated that electric cars are ""otherwise ill-suited"" to rural areas, suggesting that they may not be practical or suitable for use in these types of environments."};1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;
"2021-11-25_13-13";"Chris MacManus";"The Left";"on behalf of the The Left Group. – Mr President, I welcome the debate on congestion at international ports and increased transport costs affecting the EU. This debate has particular relevance in my own country of Ireland. As an island nation where, pre—Brexit, much of our exports had gone via Britain to the continent. It is important we continue to develop transport links between the island of Ireland and Europe. 
Increasing port traffic to and from Ireland, whilst important, needs to be complemented with increased access to these ports from across our island. This means investment in key infrastructures such as rail. Such investments should aim to increase freight and passenger services all across our island. 
Indeed, it is time for the Irish Government to act and re-open Ireland’s Western Rail Corridor. The reopening of the Western Rail Corridor would not only be an investment which tackles regional imbalance, but it would also be an investment in sustainable transport and assist our efforts to reduce carbon emissions. The rail line would provide a link from the west and northwest of Ireland to the deep-water ports of Foynes and Waterford, providing a significant opportunity for economic development and helping to reverse the decline of our region. It would not only benefit our all—Ireland economy and communities, but our environment as well. "};"There is no mention of electric vehicles in the provided speech. The text only discusses rail infrastructure and its potential benefits for sustainable transport, reducing carbon emissions, and economic development. Electric vehicles are not mentioned at all."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2021-12-15_21-2";"Adina-Ioana Vălean";"NA";" Member of the Commission. – Mr President, the concept of transport poverty, or mobility poverty, is attracting increasing attention.
Despite the lack of an exact definition, transport poverty generally refers to the inability of accessing mobility services either due to the cost, or because the services do not exist. It is not necessarily referring exclusively to those who cannot afford the access to transportation. We should also read it in a larger perspective, including those households where transport represents an important share of the family budget, and they are very sensitive to increase in prices of transport and mobility in general. 
Indeed, whereas the single market in transport has increased connectivity, mobility remains expensive for people with lower incomes and is not sufficiently accessible for people with disabilities or reduced mobility. In rural, peripheral, remote areas, including the outermost regions and islands, improved public transport links and access to affordable connectivity in general is essential to guarantee lean mobility for all. 
Mobility poverty can jeopardise access to products and services at a competitive price, as well as to social and cultural activities. But, more importantly, it can be an obstacle to access medical care, education and employment for citizens. In this context, mobility poverty is increasingly a concern, in particular for vulnerable groups. 
In our sustainable and smart mobility strategy, we are very clear on the importance of transport being available and affordable for all. Our attention shall be focused on making sure it remains available for vulnerable groups. 
The European Pillar of Social Rights is the European compass to make sure that a green and digital transition is socially fair and just. The pillar lists transport among the essential services that everyone shall have access to, and underscores the necessity to support people in need to access them. As announced in the European Pillar of Social Rights Action Plan, the Commission will present next year a report on access to essential services. It will also include a mapping of existing national and EU measures, supporting access for people at risk of poverty and social exclusion.
In the context of the Fit for 55 package the Commission has proposed a new social climate fund to address specifically the social impact of the green transition on vulnerable households, micro-enterprises and transport users, arising from the introduction of emission trading in the buildings and road transport sectors. This is of particular importance to ensure that the transition to a climate-neutral economy is just and leaves no one behind, and to ensure its social acceptance.
Once adopted by the legislator, it will provide funding to Member States to grant temporary income support and allow for subsidising to support investments intended to reduce vulnerable groups’ reliance on fossil fuels. It should offer the possibility of facilitating the purchase of zero and low-emission vehicles, or strengthening other sustainable modes of transport, including public transport, active modes of transport or shared mobility solutions, particularly in rural and remote areas. 
Investment in zero and low-emission mobility and transport also features in Member States’ resilience and recovery plans, and various other EU funds provide ample possibilities to support the transformation driven by the European Green Deal from different angles: regional funds, the Just Transition Fund, the Modernisation Fund for Lower Income Member States and the Innovation Fund. The Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) will contribute equally with EUR 1.5 billion in the next three years to help roll out the necessary infrastructure for citizens to be able to charge their electric cars. 
Yesterday, the Commission adopted a proposal on a Council recommendation to address the social and labour aspects of the climate transition. The recommendation aims at a fair transition towards climate neutrality to ensure positive employment outcomes and benefits of the green transition, as well as for garnering public support. 
Regarding transport poverty, we want to better understand and map those in difficulty as a result of increasing costs in transport. We are looking for further research and evidence, better monitoring and assessment of adequate access to essential services, including transport. Transport poverty due to the lack of transport services can also be linked to poor connectivity for remote or rural areas. 
Yesterday, the Commission also adopted a legislative proposal revising the current TEN-T Regulation that sets the foundation of a European transport infrastructure. Our network should allow seamless mobility and accessibility for all users, in particular people in situations of vulnerability. And, while a local and regional connectivity is certainly a competence of national authorities and administrations that are closer on the ground, we want to improve the accessibility of passengers where local and regional public transport connects with long-distance transport in train stations, ports and airports, with particular attention for vulnerable groups of transport users, including persons with disabilities, with reduced mobility, and people living in remote regions.
In the revision of TEN-T we have paid attention to areas in Europe where maritime and air connections play an essential role to ensure connectivity, outermost regions in particular, but not only. The revision ensures a better representation of ports and airports in those regions, and the CEF allows for more favourable conditions for projects, with cofinancing rates up to 70% in outermost regions. 
Member States also have a tailor-made tool at hand to combat transport poverty granting and, if need be, compensating public-service obligations under non-discriminatory and transparent conditions for the public transport operators. This enables them to provide public transport services essential for connectivity where there is a demand but no supply.
It is also important that transport services are not only affordable and available, but also accessible to everyone. For persons with disabilities or with reduced mobility, the main problem in accessing transport services is the lack of accessible vehicles, barriers in transport stations and inadequate transport information systems. 
I want to thank Parliament again for its support earlier this year when adopting the Regulation for Rail Passengers’ Rights, which gives extended rights to persons with disabilities and reduced mobility. They will now have better access to information. The rules on liability of railway companies have been further reinforced when they take care of the mobility equipment of persons with reduced mobility when travelling, which is critical in their daily life. 
Now when assessing the current legal framework on passenger rights and TRMs earlier this year, we have found that there are still gaps. While some rules would need clarification, in the coming weeks we will also launch an impact assessment to review the legislative framework on passenger rights and TRMs when using air, water, boat and bus and coach transport, and in addition, will propose legislation by 2022 on the provision and use of commercially sensitive data for multimodal digital mobility services, which will also improve journey planning for persons with reduced mobility. 
I rest here and I am looking forward to listening to your opinion. I trust that working together we can address this issue which is becoming more and more worrying."};"The text mentions electric vehicles in the following context:

""...facilitating the purchase of zero and low-emission vehicles, or strengthening other sustainable modes of transport, including public transport, active modes of transport or shared mobility solutions, particularly in rural and remote areas.""

This sentence is part of a larger discussion about the Commission's proposal for a new social climate fund to address the social impact of the green transition on vulnerable households, micro-enterprises, and transport users. The fund aims to provide funding to Member States to support investments that reduce vulnerable groups' reliance on fossil fuels, including the purchase of zero-emission vehicles.

Additionally, it is mentioned that the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) will contribute EUR 1.5 billion over three years to help roll out the necessary infrastructure for citizens to be able to charge their electric cars.

That's all the information about electric vehicles in the text."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;
"2021-12-15_21-4";"Isabel García Muñoz";"S&D";"
    On behalf of the S&D Group. - Mr. President, Madam Commissioner, there is no doubt that a greater climate ambition is necessary to fight against climate change and that the contribution of the transport sector to the reduction of emissions is unavoidable. 
    But we must not forget that this transition must be fair and, something very important: it must be perceived by European citizens as an opportunity. This is because the decarbonization of transport will be accompanied by an increase in its competitiveness and connectivity of all territories.
    Transport is an international sector and the climate commitment must be global. That's why the European Union must be a leader in the IMO and the ICAO. We need to avoid the creation of CO2 tax havens in third countries where they continue to pollute without consequence and at the expense of many jobs and European companies. We need to accompany this transition with sufficient economic resources to mitigate any possible adverse impacts, especially among the most vulnerable groups and the most affected regions.
    A social climate fund without conditions will be essential to guarantee the affordability and accessibility of transport, to promote public transport, also in rural areas, and to incentivize the purchase of zero-emission vehicles.
    Our bet: a green sector responsible for social and territorially aligned with the Green Pact we defend with a heart full of red."};"According to the speech, it is mentioned that ""incentiviz[ing] the purchase of zero-emission vehicles"" will be important for promoting sustainable transport. Zero-emission vehicles are likely referring to electric vehicles (EVs), as they produce no emissions or pollutants.

The text does not provide further details about electric vehicles, such as their adoption rates, infrastructure development, or technological advancements. However, it emphasizes the importance of incentivizing the purchase of EVs as part of a broader strategy to promote sustainable transport and mitigate the adverse impacts of climate change on vulnerable groups and regions."};0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;
"2021-12-15_21-18";"Andrey Novakov";"EPP";" – Mr. Chairman, if we raise the price of gasoline to two euros, we will not save the environment. If we tax airplane tickets with a carbon tax, we will not improve air quality, but we will drive people off airplanes.
    It is easy to talk about solar energy and wind energy, but during the summer. Now, in winter, everyone heats with coal and gas, including this hall at the moment.
    In general, I see the emergence of a new type of politician - I call them helicopters because they hover in the clouds, occasionally landing on Earth to make a little noise and dust in people's eyes, and then fly away again.
    They need to know that they will encounter reasonable resistance from all of us who still walk on the ground and talk to people.
    I believe in the market. And when electric cars become good enough and better than conventional cars, people will start buying them without forcing them with voting in this hall.
    When, thanks to technology, we can use solar and wind energy almost for free, I assure you that no one will dig under the ground as they do whatever.
    That's it. Everything else is illusions. And high costs. Often in combination."};"According to the speech, the speaker believes that:

* Electric cars will become good enough and better than conventional cars at some point.
* When this happens, people will start buying them without needing to be forced by laws or regulations (implied through voting).
* The speaker trusts in the market's ability to drive adoption of electric vehicles.

That's all the information about electric vehicles mentioned in the text."};0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;1;0;0;0;
"2021-12-15_21-20";"Adina-Ioana Vălean";"NA";" Member of the Commission. – Mr President, it is, as usual, a pleasure to listen to colleagues here in the House and you are all very much up with the times with your debates, and I can see what is worrying you. It is worrying what is going on right now in Europe with energy prices but we have to be aware and differentiate a bit between what is actually transport policy and what is the global market and other global effects on the issue. 
What is interesting, and was raised by you, is to discuss the cumulative effects of various measures in the Fit for 55 package, which are beyond transport policies directly. The truth is that the Commission’s modelling estimates the cumulative effects of the different policy proposals over time. This is true not only for cost but also for benefits, such as important air quality or reduced fossil fuel import bills. Importantly, as the modelling has shown, the proposed measures interact and stress on each other. So the right mix of policies lessens the possible negative impacts and enables greater ambition. 
Road transport provides an example of this dynamic at work. Improving CO2 standards for cars and vans will ensure the supply of low emission vehicles. A mix of taxation and carbon pricing provides incentives for the purchase of low emission vehicles, ensuring demand. And finally, providing support for installing charging infrastructure will ensure that the transition is feasible. So this would be the plan that explains the package. Let’s hope that the market also will kick in somewhere in all this story, and then we will have a more natural and solid transition. 
What are we doing in transport to address the complexity of the issues brought about by the transition? This is highlighted in the smart and sustainable mobility strategy. You discussed it and you looked at the basket of measures I was proposing and you said it was OK, because it is for the transition, it is for each mode, it is for multimodality. We are adding brick by brick to this construction of the sustainable future of transport, the last one being yesterday with the TEN-T Regulation. So I trust that if we are discussing and approaching it from all angles, looking at the threats but also the benefits, looking at the costs but also at where we can reduce the costs in other parts, it might in the end come to a positive result. 
The emissions trading system (ETS) was discussed in particular. It’s true that the ETS is proposed for roads and buildings and this is something new. And of course, we don’t want to create an effect which would lead to poverty in transport for people because of the increase in prices. The measure envisaged by the Commission was the creation of the social climate fund, which will channel around 25% of auction revenues from the new ETS to counter energy and transport poverty. The fund will support measures and investments intended to grant improved access to zero- and low-emission mobility and transport. Member States are also able to give temporary direct support to vulnerable households to absorb the ETS immediate price impact – indeed, from their budgets, in answer to Mr Marinescu, where else from?
The Commission, also proposes that the Member States dedicate all revenues from the existing and the new ETS to these climate-related purposes. And I know very well that in this House, each time we agree on taxes or put a price on the externalities, we ask that the money collected will go towards innovation and green policies so that the cost of these externalities will be reduced over time. 
Apart from the social climate fund, all the others, as I said in my initial speech – the Social Fund, the Just Transition Fund, the Cohesion Fund – are all envisaged to support this transition and the eventual impact of the ETS on buildings and roads. 
But the ball is in your court and I’m looking forward to your debate in the European Parliament on this topic. We are here as a Commission to support this debate and look forward to a good outcome from it.
In transport policy, in particular, if you look at all the measures, a basket of measures we are proposing in our strategy, you will see that it all makes sense for a solid transition towards more sustainable and smart transport."};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned related to electric vehicles:

1. Improving CO2 standards for cars and vans will ensure the supply of low-emission vehicles.
2. A mix of taxation and carbon pricing provides incentives for the purchase of low-emission vehicles, ensuring demand.
3. Providing support for installing charging infrastructure will ensure that the transition is feasible.

These points are mentioned as part of a broader plan to address the complexity of issues brought about by the transition to more sustainable transport, which includes the smart and sustainable mobility strategy."};0;0;0;0;1;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2021-12-16_13-11";"Arba Kokalari";"EPP";"
    Mr. Chairman! The pandemic has shown that trade and cooperation are the most important tools for managing crises. This applies not only to the corona crisis but also to the climate crisis. Throughout the EU, we can see how researchers, entrepreneurs, and entrepreneurs develop new solutions to reduce emissions and contribute to the circular economy.
    Here, as politicians, we must do better at giving carrots to boost the green relaunch of Europe's economy. We must abolish tariffs on climate-damaging goods. We must remove trade barriers for sustainable services such as repairs and leasing. We must eliminate bureaucracy and bans on trade with recovered materials. That we have tariffs on electric cars feels incredibly strange in these times.
    Our trade policy is also the key to achieving a green and sustainable circular economy, not only by making it more expensive to release, but also by giving more carrots to entrepreneurs."};"According to the speech, one thing related to electric vehicles mentioned is that ""we have tariffs on electric cars"" which feels ""incredibly strange"" in these times. This implies that the speaker believes it is unusual or counterintuitive to have tariffs on electric cars, given the focus on reducing emissions and promoting a green economy."};0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;
"2021-12-16_13-15";"Mick Wallace";"The Left";" – Mr President, since January last year, Austria has progressively introduced restrictions on heavy goods vehicles transiting through the Brenner Pass. Italian businesses have been particularly hard hit by these restrictions. Austria’s argument that it has introduced a ban to reduce emissions does not really stack up. These restrictions are simply forcing trucks on longer diversions with a higher carbon footprint. But this dispute needs to be seen as part of a wider debate. 
The EU needs to rapidly accelerate the shift to zero-emission trucks. The decarbonisation of road freight simply won’t happen in the next decade without public support. We need to help hauliers to switch to zero-emission trucks, for example via schemes to buy or lease zero-emission trucks. Small and medium-sized enterprises represent 99% of haulage companies, so they need to be essential to this transition, and we need large public investment to ensure adequate charging infrastructure.
 It is good that the new Alternative Fuels Infrastructure Regulation will set out minimum targets for public heavy-duty vehicle-charging infrastructure for the first time ever, but the Commission is severely underestimating the total number of battery electric trucks that will be on the road in 2030, which means that it’s also underestimating the future demand for charging infrastructure.
The protection of the single market should never supersede the interests of the environment, but unilateral natural measures, in this instance, will not solve the problem. 
I hope everyone here has a really good Christmas as well, and a particular thanks for the year for the wonderful staff in the Parliament."};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned related to electric vehicles:

1. The need to rapidly accelerate the shift to zero-emission trucks: The speaker emphasizes that the decarbonization of road freight will not happen without public support.
2. Help for hauliers to switch to zero-emission trucks: Schemes to buy or lease zero-emission trucks are suggested as a way to facilitate this transition.
3. Importance of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in the transition: SMEs represent 99% of haulage companies, so they need to be essential to the shift to zero-emission trucks.
4. Need for large public investment in charging infrastructure: Adequate charging infrastructure is necessary to support the growth of electric vehicles.
5. Underestimation of battery electric truck demand: The Commission is underestimating the total number of battery electric trucks that will be on the road in 2030, which means they are also underestimating future demand for charging infrastructure.

Overall, the speech highlights the importance of transitioning to zero-emission trucks and the need for public support and investment in charging infrastructure to make this transition a reality."};0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;
"2022-02-16_17-5";"Petar Vitanov";"S&D";"on behalf of the S&D Group. – Mr President, first I would like to congratulate my colleague Mr Ferrandino for being so patient, because after almost 4 years of complicated negotiations, we are at the verge of adopting the EU road-charging legislative framework, and this framework is one of the main instruments and turning points in road transport decarbonisation. I cannot agree with Ms Thaler, because we used to have 27 different approaches and now this is a clear step in the right direction towards a European integrity. And phasing out of time—based charges for trucks on the core trans—European network and the shift to distance—based charging is a clear step forward.
Varying road charges based on the CO2 emissions and the environmental performance of the vehicle, together with mandatory external cost-charging for trucks, will be a major incentive for the take-up of low- and zero-emission trucks and the renewal in the fleet. It shows that the provisional agreement will make the user-pays and polluter-pays principle applicable to road charging, which is one of the main principles of our European Green Deal.
And the other very important element for the European Parliament, which was very, very difficult to achieve, is the mandatory earmarking of the revenues of the congestion charges to be spent on sustainable transport. 
And with all I’ve said I want to encourage all of you not to support any amendments and support the provisional agreement because today we do not need to be part of the problem, but we need to be part of the solution and a solution is towards more sustainable, fairer road transport."};"The text does not explicitly mention electric vehicles. However, it mentions ""low- and zero-emission trucks"" which could potentially include electric or hybrid vehicles.

The relevant sentence is:

""Varying road charges based on the CO2 emissions and the environmental performance of the vehicle, together with mandatory external cost-charging for trucks, will be a major incentive for the take-up of low- and zero-emission trucks and the renewal in the fleet.""

This suggests that the EU road-charging legislative framework aims to encourage the adoption of vehicles with lower or zero CO2 emissions, which could include electric or hybrid vehicles. However, it does not provide specific details about electric vehicles or their role in the framework."};0;0;1;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2022-02-16_17-6";"Izaskun Bilbao Barandica";"Renew";"
    On behalf of the Renew Group. - Mr. President, I would like to ask you for twenty seconds of extension time. I need them as a member of a fishing family to remind, in the heart of the Union, the victims of the Villa de Pitanxo shipwreck. My solidarity with the pain of their families, my fraternal embrace for those who have lost everything, and my claim for a sector and people who deserve empathy, understanding, and support, which also feels and understands when, against wind and tide, you have waited for your dearest on a pier. Rest in peace.
    
    The report we approve today is crucial for promoting the decarbonization of transport and harmonizing the tasks that the Member States of the Union carried out in their road toll systems. Those differences threaten the proper functioning of the single transport market. That's why we replace an incomplete, unsatisfactory, and unfair regulation. Opposing this progress is supporting what was before.
    
    We all agree that those who pollute and use pay. The fee is better adjusted by replacing time with distance, also reducing costs for cleaner vehicles and incorporating a congestion fee.
    
    The scope of application has been expanded, adding trucks, light transport vehicles, and buses to the list. Likewise, the door is opened for the application to cars, for which there will be short-term vignettes, including a one-day vignette for vehicles in transit. It is also planned to review the standard if transport is included in a future carbon pricing mechanism.
    
    But users, those who pay, deserve in return that the money they contribute finance programs to support transport, sustainable transport, from incentives for fleet renewal, to investments in infrastructure. Because better roads, digitalization, and intelligent traffic management are vital for safety, to avoid congestion, and to achieve the emission reduction targets we have set ourselves. The credibility and equity of this system require this exercise of pedagogy and justice."};"The text does not explicitly mention electric vehicles, but it does mention ""cleaner vehicles"" which could potentially refer to electric vehicles. The context suggests that the speaker is discussing a regulation related to road toll systems and transport decarbonization.

In the relevant section, the speaker states: ""We all agree that those who pollute and use pay. The fee is better adjusted by replacing time with distance, also reducing costs for cleaner vehicles...""

This sentence implies that the regulation aims to reduce costs for vehicles that are considered ""cleaner"", which could include electric vehicles since they produce zero emissions. However, it's important to note that the text does not explicitly mention electric vehicles or provide any specific details about them.

Overall, the text suggests that the regulation is intended to promote decarbonization of transport and support sustainable transport options, but it does not provide any direct information about electric vehicles."};0;0;0;0;1;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2022-02-16_17-12";"Karima Delli";"Greens/EFA";"
    Mr. President, dear colleagues, tonight we want to show that the results of the negotiations between Parliament and the Council on the road toll file are below our expectations. This is a text much less ambitious than in the first reading, in October 2018. Four years later, the polluter-pays and user-pays principles are almost absent for subscribers. The external costs of road transport, that is to say air pollution and noise, are hardly taken into account.
    Should we remind you of the climate emergency and the 800,000 premature deaths each year due to air pollution? Should we remind you that this road toll lever would allow us to invest in more trains, more freight rail and more sustainable transport? Because yes, more trains and more sustainable mobility are also good for employment. When it's good for the climate, it's good for employment.
    Dear colleagues, we have a responsibility tomorrow. There are audacious amendments. We will hold our heads high and make sure that this Parliament is up to the challenge of the climate, but also to the demand, I tell you, of our perspective in transport."};"There is no mention of electric vehicles in the provided speech. The text only discusses road tolls, air pollution, noise, climate emergency, trains, freight rail, sustainable transport, and employment, but does not mention electric vehicles at all."};0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;
"2022-03-07_12-27";"Vera Tax";"S&D";" – Chairman, Commissioner Ferreira, dear colleagues, European cities and regions face enormous challenges. I initially thought of greening houses, adapting infrastructure, sustainable transport, and of course not to be forgotten: COVID-19. Look at the healthcare sector or the tourism sector. There is much to be gained, and the cohesion funds can help with that. So it's time for us to really start on that and implement it.
    But more than ever, the refugee influx from Ukraine is current. I am very pleased, Commissioner Ferreira, that you have undertaken to look at how the cohesion funds can contribute to this. Because we must of course tackle this crisis first. That's why it's important for Member States to quickly make a contribution to this as well, and I am pleased that you play a major role in this."};"There is no mention of electric vehicles in the provided speech. The topics discussed include:

* Greening houses
* Adapting infrastructure
* Sustainable transport (no specific details or mentions of electric vehicles)
* COVID-19
* Refugee influx from Ukraine and how to address it using cohesion funds

No information related to electric vehicles is mentioned in the text."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2022-03-09_10-2";"Simona Bonafè";"NA";"
    Speaker - Madam President, Mr. Commissioner, esteemed colleagues, just by looking around this room, we can see how the use of batteries is already an integral part of our daily lives and will be even more so in the coming years if it is true, as it is true, that Europe has set itself the goal of climate neutrality by 2050. Mobility will become increasingly sustainable, our cities will become smarter and to focus more on renewable energy sources, we will need batteries even more. In a nutshell, batteries will be the pillar on which to build our new sustainable development model. That is why this regulation we are discussing is essential. Essential to create in Europe a true value chain around this product, from rules and standards in design and manufacturing to new targets in recovery and recycling of batteries.
    For the first time, European legislation takes into account the entire life cycle of a product. From the moment the product is conceived, that is its design, up to end-of-life, as I said before. This new holistic approach - I insist on emphasizing this - must from now on be the rule for future legislations on sustainable products and circular economy. And it is no coincidence, it was not a coincidence that this holistic approach was proposed for a product like batteries, which in the coming years will see their use increase significantly and also expand into new sectors.
    For example: it is estimated that battery usage, just for electric vehicles, will increase 15 times from 2030 to 2035, without counting that today, right now, electric light vehicles such as scooters, e-bikes and monopattini are becoming more and more widespread. These figures show how the use of strategic materials at the base of battery technology, particularly lithium ions and cobalt, lithium, nickel and manganese, which Europe is poor in and today depends entirely on imports, will increase hand in hand.
    To keep up with our global competitors, ensuring strategic autonomy in supply and exploiting the potential of new technologies, industrial policies based on circularity principles must be put into play. Therefore, the new regulation must have a double objective: on one hand, to ensure high human health protection and environmental protection, but also to guarantee, with harmonized standards, that battery production remains in Europe. We must avoid making the same mistake made in the past for solar panels, where incentives for commercialization were not matched by the creation of a new European industrial sector.
    Carbon footprint maximum, minimum content of recycled material, performance standards, durability and removability are the main sustainability requirements introduced for the first time for batteries, which must become a benchmark for the entire global market and must be applied to any type of battery commercialized in the European market, including those imported from non-EU countries.
    To make batteries truly sustainable, it is not enough to respect the environmental aspect and avoid predatory actions on natural resources, but this must be combined with respect for social rights, one of which is the ban on child labor in ore mines for raw materials. Through this regulation, we have set this goal and for the first time, the due diligence obligation has been made compulsory for a specific product. Therefore, all batteries entering the market will be covered by these new rules. 
    The greatest reliance on batteries will also result in a greater quantity of waste. It is expected, for example, that the number of ready-to-recycle lithium batteries will increase 700 times between 2020 and 2040. A ambitious and quantitative collection requirement for all categories of batteries is therefore the essential prerequisite to implement a circular model and create an efficient market for primary and secondary raw materials. The introduction of mandatory requirements for extended producer responsibility and an increase in collection targets are exactly in this direction.
    
    To conclude my intervention, I think we are all aware of the complexity of this legislation that will also have to adapt to the evolution of new technologies, not yet fully mature. However, we have before us a challenge that requires an immediate response. As Parliament, we have grasped it, I hope the Council can do the same, so as to have in a short time ambitious regulations that allow the European Union to become a global leader in the battery market."};"According to the speech, it is estimated that battery usage for electric vehicles will increase 15 times from 2030 to 2035. Additionally, it is mentioned that electric light vehicles such as scooters, e-bikes, and monopattini are becoming more widespread today.

In summary, the text mentions:

* The expected significant increase in battery usage for electric vehicles between 2030 and 2035 (15 times)
* The growing popularity of electric light vehicles like scooters, e-bikes, and monopattini

These points highlight the increasing demand for batteries in the electric vehicle sector and its related applications."};0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;1;
"2022-03-09_10-3";"Patrizia Toia";"NA";" Speaker for the Industry, Research and Energy Commission - Madam President, Mr. Commissioner, esteemed colleagues, Europe in the past has often made the mistake of not connecting its environmental policies to a coherent industrial policy, as in the case of solar panels, a classic example, and thus created a dangerous dependence on other areas of the world, both for high-tech products and for low-content products.
    Now we are facing the challenge of high-capacity storage batteries, batteries essential for electric mobility, but also for the transition to renewables, as the rapporteur has well illustrated. Many thought it was too late, that the challenge had already been lost for Europe, but no, we believe in it and so does Europe, which is working to become a competitive continent in this production, both on the technological plane and on the industrial one, and to achieve its own sovereignty as is often our ambition. For this reason, we have created a Battery Alliance, bringing together the world of research, businesses, and public authorities, and in some way we have also made progress, this regulation also makes progress: it does not limit itself to talking about disposal, but covers everything upstream, defining the features that batteries must have to be marketed in the European market and thus providing principles, including due diligence, that will apply to everyone, and setting targets and recycling quotas for critical raw materials. The regulation on one side, the Alliance for Research and Innovation Technology, the PCI for common projects of European interest, gigafactories to create production capacity: only in this way, with all these tools, can we have high-performance batteries in Europe and the highest recycling of their components. On this front, it has been our contribution as the ITRE Commission and our ambition for the project, the challenge is won in Europe if environmental policies are connected to industrial strategies, the technological effort, and the full implementation of circular economy principles."};"According to the speech, batteries essential for ""electric mobility"" are mentioned as one of the key challenges Europe faces. This implies that electric vehicles (EVs) rely on high-capacity storage batteries, which is a crucial component for their operation.

The speaker also mentions that these batteries are not only important for EVs but also for the transition to renewable energy sources. This suggests that the development and production of high-performance batteries in Europe is seen as a key step towards reducing dependence on other regions and achieving environmental goals.

In summary, the text mentions electric vehicles (EVs) as one of the areas where high-capacity storage batteries are essential, highlighting their importance for both EVs and the transition to renewable energy sources."};0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;1;
"2022-03-09_10-6";"Ismail Ertug";"NA";"
    Author of the opinion of the consultative committee on transport and tourism. - Madam President! I cannot emphasize enough how important this report is for achieving our climate goals. Just a few weeks ago, we would have only talked about the environmental, ecological, and social benefits of the battery regulation, which will bring Europe to a sustainable and emissions-free future.
    But with the war in Ukraine, nothing is as it was before. In this report, dear colleagues, it is now also about the strategic securing of raw materials for a rapidly growing battery industry and accelerating our clean energy transition. It has been mentioned that recycling valuable and environmentally critical materials from batteries is a key to a sustainable and competitive battery industry that should be at the forefront worldwide. The introduction of minimum targets for recycling efficiency and collection of used batteries will make a significant contribution to this goal.
    From a transport perspective, I would like to highlight the expansion to light means of transport and the deletion of the 2-kilowatt threshold. We are thus making legislation future-proof by including e-bikes and so-called e-scooters in the regulation. Across Europe, there are around 1000 small and medium-sized enterprises with more than 155,000 directly or indirectly employed specialists in this sector. Alone in the bicycle industry, a turnover of more than 18 billion euros is generated. With the battery regulation, we will ensure that markets for electric vehicles and e-bikes with all the advantages of these vehicles for the environment and health continue to flourish and that these vehicles are brought onto the European market."};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned related to electric vehicles:

1. The expansion of the battery regulation to include light means of transport, which will make legislation future-proof by including e-bikes and e-scooters.
2. The deletion of the 2-kilowatt threshold, allowing for the inclusion of these types of vehicles in the regulation.
3. The importance of ensuring that markets for electric vehicles continue to flourish, with advantages for the environment and health.

Overall, the speaker is highlighting the need to include e-bikes and other light electric vehicles in the battery regulation to promote their adoption and growth in Europe."};0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;
"2022-03-09_10-8";"Adriana Maldonado López";"S&D";"
    On behalf of the S&D Group. - Madam President, Mr. Commissioner, firstly, I would like to congratulate my colleague Simona Bonafè on the excellent report she has been able to bring forward for the Committee on Environment, Public Health and Food Safety. 
    I believe it is important that we put this report in context as to why the importance of this future Regulation (former Directive - already very important) will be coming out possibly here, ahead in the European Parliament Plenary Session. 
    This future Regulation falls within the Circular Economy Action Plan that the Commission presented last March. This plan included the change from directive to regulation and, in the IMCO Committee, we are very proud because, firstly, it allows harmonization of a rule and makes it completely transversal for the different Member States. 
    This Regulation is important because it falls within the tsunami of European Green Pact legislation that will change our way of consuming, relating, producing within the European Union and, ultimately, our way of relating to the surrounding world. 
    It is the first time that the European Union is able to regulate along the entire value chain of a product: from how we extract raw materials and the conditions that must be met for this extraction to how we are capable of eliminating the last residues or recycling batteries. 
    I would like to highlight three important aspects that I believe are valued and are at the center of this approval that we will make in the European Parliament. 
    Firstly, among these three objectives, there is respect for human rights throughout the process, especially in the extraction of raw materials, also reducing the environmental impact during the manufacture of batteries and cells, and finally, but not less important, ensuring that batteries circulating in the internal market are sustainable, with high performance, and above all, safe for all consumers. 
    In addition, it is important to value what we have achieved: not only will certain batteries be incorporated, portable batteries, automotive batteries, electric vehicle batteries, and industrial batteries must also be included. 
    However, I would like to focus on an element very used by a very important segment of the population, such as young people. We have been able to incorporate light transport means, such as electric scooters, since we cannot be left out of this technological change and consumption habits. 
    In short, a future Regulation that falls within the Green Agenda and the Union's technological agenda. We must value the role played by consumers and above all create social awareness in European citizens regarding everything related to what we consume, what we produce, and how we relate to the environment."};"According to the speech, electric vehicles are mentioned as one of the types of batteries that will be included in the future Regulation. The speaker specifically mentions ""electric vehicle batteries"" alongside other types of batteries such as portable batteries, automotive batteries, and industrial batteries.

The speaker does not provide any additional information about electric vehicles beyond their inclusion in the Regulation. They do not discuss the benefits or implications of electric vehicles, nor do they mention any specific features or technologies related to them. The focus is primarily on the importance of including electric vehicle batteries in the Regulation as part of a broader effort to promote sustainability and environmental responsibility."};0;0;1;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2022-03-09_10-10";"Malte Gallée";"Greens/EFA";"
    On behalf of the Verts/ALE Group. – Madam President, dear Mr. Commissioner, dear Simona! I believe we all understand that it has never been clearer and never been more urgent than in these days and hours: We must do everything we can to move away from fossil fuels, and batteries are a key technology for this.
    Climate crisis, species extinction, environmental pollution - we must face these crises with full force. For that, we need laws that enable exactly that.
    Mr. Commissioner, I would like to thank you explicitly for an excellent legislative proposal. For the first time, we are thinking sustainably and holistically in product policy, from the extraction of raw materials to CO2-free production to long lifetimes and real recycling. This battery regulation can become a real blueprint for future legislation, for sustainable products.
    But at some points, we had to sharpen the proposal again, of course, decisively. Firstly, we need strong right to repair. All batteries in mobile phones, laptops and similar devices must be able to be exchanged by consumers themselves. Here, companies have really neglected the interests of people and the environment for a long time in the past.
    Secondly, real recycling for all batteries. The important raw materials such as lithium, cobalt, nickel must not only be recycled but also reused. Only then can we take a step towards a true circular economy.
    And thirdly: exploitation - in a cobalt mine, for example, will not suddenly become irrelevant just because the raw material is used in a small battery. Therefore, rules of due diligence must apply to all batteries and not only to electric cars.
    All in all: Together we have managed to put together a really revolutionary package, on which civil society around the world looks forward with great expectations, especially also indigenous communities.
    Dear colleagues, let us lay the foundation today for clean batteries made in Europe, future-proof jobs in Europe, clean technology for the much needed energy transition, effective consumer protection and global justice."};"According to the speech, there is no direct mention of electric vehicles (EVs). However, it does mention ""electric cars"" in one sentence:

""And thirdly: exploitation - in a cobalt mine, for example, will not suddenly become irrelevant just because the raw material is used in a small battery. Therefore, rules of due diligence must apply to all batteries and not only to electric cars.""

This sentence implies that electric cars are one type of product that uses batteries containing cobalt, but it does not provide any further information about EVs or their role in the energy transition."};0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;
"2022-03-09_10-11";"Sylvia Limmer";"ID";"
    On behalf of the ID faction. - Madam President, dear colleagues! Apart from the fact that it is completely insane to force the market for cars through political decrees to switch to expensive, by no means CO2-free, resource-devouring electric and battery technology - apart from the usual nonsense - I agree with the Commission that batteries are a key technology. Batteries have been ordered and therefore require regulation. Not least because this technology is still in its infancy, and especially because it aims to equalize the conditions to which combustion engines and electromobility are subjected.
    
    For contrary to other claims, batteries are neither particularly sustainable, CO2-free or environmentally friendly, as the regulation in question partly changes - which I am prepared to welcome for the time being. However, I find it strange that for my taste they take too much time for this. Instead of demanding certification of the CO2 footprint of batteries by mid-2023, there will only be a CO2 declaration one year later. Strange for an electromobility that claims to be CO2-free!
    
    That one wants to compensate for the enormous environmental damage, but also foreseeable economic dependencies with recycling rates is at best to be valued as a nice attempt. A study came to the conclusion: If one wanted to electrify the 32 million British vehicles, it would require twice the world production of cobalt and 75 percent of global lithium production.
    
    Worldwide, however, 56 million cars are produced annually. According to an analysis by the Fraunhofer Institute from November 2021, all recycling methods are still in the pilot phase and produce as extremely energy-intensive processes large amounts of CO2 and toxic waste products.
    
    I consider the problems arising from future raw material dependencies to be much more serious. Up to 20 percent of nickel suitable for batteries come from Russia. The dependence on China with regard to rare earths and almost all processed battery materials is no less worrying. The current crisis should teach us a lesson here. We should not create new dependencies willy-nilly.
    
    My conclusion, therefore: Another grandiose political wrong decision in the name of the climate with subsequent legislation to save will probably fail.
    
    At the end, however, something that is particularly close to my heart as a mother: All my motions to implement child labor as an exclusion criterion in supply chains were rejected in the committee. Please do not let it happen that children become victims for the e-lifestyle cars of the affluent green clientele. Do not look away. Vote for our motions on this issue."};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned related to electric vehicles:

1. The speaker argues that forcing the market to switch to electric vehicles (e-mobility) through political decrees is ""completely insane"" because it promotes expensive and resource-devouring technology.
2. Batteries for e-mobility require regulation, especially since they aim to equalize conditions between combustion engines and electromobility.
3. The speaker claims that batteries are not particularly sustainable, CO2-free, or environmentally friendly, citing the need for certification of their CO2 footprint by mid-2023 (which is delayed).
4. Electrifying vehicles would require large amounts of cobalt and lithium, which could lead to environmental damage and dependencies on raw materials.
5. The speaker expresses concern about the dependence on China for rare earths and processed battery materials, as well as Russia for nickel suitable for batteries.
6. The speaker concludes that promoting e-mobility without addressing these issues would be a ""grandiose political wrong decision"" that could fail to achieve its goals.

Overall, the speech presents a critical view of electric vehicles, highlighting concerns about their environmental impact, resource dependencies, and potential negative consequences."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;1;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;1;
"2022-03-09_10-12";"Nicola Procaccini";"ECR";"
    On behalf of the ECR group. - Madam President, honorable colleagues, the blind advance in the energy transition passes today from this Chamber and draws new vigor from the content of this report, a document that, despite some appreciable efforts, betrays an ideological non-technical, non-realistic and not even environmentally justified approach, since it is at least imprecise to claim that an electric car pollutes less than a gasoline car.
    This uncritical enthusiasm for the electric confirms an approach not only Manichean but also lacking a strategic vision that leads us straight towards another energy dependence, that from China, a country that monopolizes, with the brutality typical of totalitarian regimes, the deposits of raw materials necessary for the realization of batteries from which we depend on renewable sources. Has the lesson of these days not been enough? Running at breakneck speed towards a reduction in CO2 emissions that would only affect 8% of what we are responsible for on a global scale, we have given up extracting gas from our deposits, given up gas pipelines and regasification plants, closed nuclear power plants, dismantled coal-fired power plants, which today are eager to reopen in haste, but above all, we have become slaves to the purchase of energy from Russia, Qatar, and other not at all liberal regimes, a situation that prevents us, among other things, from effectively sanctioning Putin's mad war in Ukraine, a conflict that could even become apocalyptic.
    So be it with climate neutrality, but our political priority, which we have repeated so many times, must be energy independence, from which depends the stability of our economic system but also our democratic sovereignty.
    We are worried about a temperature increase of 1 or 2 degrees in the long term, but our children ask us first and foremost to arrive at the long term."};"According to the speech, it is claimed that an electric car pollutes less than a gasoline car, but this claim is considered ""at least imprecise"". This suggests that the speaker does not agree with the idea that electric vehicles are inherently environmentally friendly or produce fewer emissions than traditional gasoline-powered cars."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;
"2022-03-09_10-15";"Günther Sidl";"S&D";"
    Madam President, esteemed Commissioner, colleagues! Batteries are a key technology for the energy transition in Europe. They are essential for sustainable mobility and for storing energy from renewable sources, and they are also an integral part of our daily lives.
    Estimates suggest that the total volume of industrial batteries, including those for e-bikes and electric vehicles, will increase from the current 0.7 million tons to almost 4.4 million tons by 2035.
    I am very pleased with the present report, as many important topics along the entire lifecycle of batteries have been regulated anew, not only along the supply chain but also along the entire value creation chain. We are setting new standards for clean batteries. For the first time, batteries must meet minimum requirements for sustainable and socially responsible extraction of raw materials.
    In addition, consumer rights will be significantly strengthened. Products with everyday relevance should fall under these regulations, especially products with embedded batteries such as smartphones or tablets. These batteries must be exchangeable in the future to extend the life of products.
    In this regard, I trust your support so that this report does not lose its strength in the vote."};"According to the speech, it is mentioned that:

* The total volume of industrial batteries, including those for e-bikes and electric vehicles, will increase from 0.7 million tons to almost 4.4 million tons by 2035.

That's the only mention of electric vehicles in the text."};0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2022-03-09_10-16";"Elsi Katainen";"Renew";"
    Dear Mr. President, esteemed Commissioner, the EU urgently needs a new battery directive as electric mobility is advancing rapidly and battery production and demand are increasing. I am pleased that the Parliament's report sends a strong signal in favor of promoting sustainable battery production in Europe, which is crucial both for investments and for ensuring security of supply, as well as for achieving climate goals.
    The growing demand for batteries creates pressure on raw material availability. It is important to ensure responsible production of batteries, which is appropriately addressed in the Parliament's report. In addition, it is positive that the report emphasizes the use and development of innovative new raw materials in battery production. Wood pulp lignin is a good example of such a new sustainable material that promotes the sustainability of the battery industry and circular economy.
    New mobility formats, such as electric scooters and electric kickbikes, have seen their market share grow rapidly in recent years. It is great that the ambitious recycling targets for batteries have been expanded to cover not only heavy-duty batteries but also lightweight batteries for e-mobility, ensuring efficient and comprehensive recycling in the circular economy sector. In addition, flexibility in battery waste flows for manufacturers and industry associations ensures that already effective recycling systems can smoothly transition under this new directive. With the new battery directive, we create sustainable growth and new investments in Europe."};"According to the speech, electric mobility is advancing rapidly, which means that electric vehicles are becoming more popular. The growing demand for batteries creates pressure on raw material availability, implying that there is an increasing need for battery production to support the growth of electric vehicles.

Additionally, new mobility formats such as electric scooters and electric kickbikes have seen their market share grow rapidly in recent years, which suggests that electric vehicles are becoming more mainstream. The speech also mentions ""e-mobility"" specifically, indicating a focus on electric vehicles.

Overall, the text highlights the rapid growth of electric vehicles and the need for sustainable battery production to support this growth."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;1;
"2022-03-09_10-17";"Anna Cavazzini";"Greens/EFA";"
    Madam President, dear Commissioner, dear colleagues! The decarbonization of our economy, the exit from fossil fuels and the massive expansion of renewable energies - since Putin's terrible attack on Ukraine, I believe that everyone understands that we need the green transformation not only for our climate but also for our strategic sovereignty. And batteries are the decisive building block for this transformation.
    Large industrial batteries store the electricity generated from renewables and enable grid feeding. Battery-powered vehicles displace diesel and gasoline engines from Europe's roads, even if that doesn't please the AfD. However, 90% of batteries are currently imported into the EU. Whether imported or manufactured - for all these batteries, raw materials are needed, and their extraction often leads to human rights violations and environmental destruction.
    I have fought for this - and we have worked hard in the Committee on Internal Market and Consumer Protection - to sharpen the Battery Regulation and ensure that human rights and the environment must be guaranteed along the supply chains. This is an important message also for citizens who repeatedly say: Yes, I want an electric car, but I don't want batteries where blood sticks.
    We have ensured in Parliament that batteries last longer. And we have created a right to repair devices with batteries. With this, we can finally say goodbye to stuck batteries and use devices for longer when the battery wants to give up the ghost.
    We have improved the Commission's proposal so that all batteries sold on the internal market are manufactured with clean energy. After all, 70% of a battery's emissions stem from the production phase, and many batteries are still made today with coal and other fossil fuels.
    With this Battery Regulation, we are taking the path to a true circular economy in which raw materials in old batteries and devices are systematically recovered, recycled, and reused. We should do this as quickly as possible with all products - for a real green internal market."};"According to the speech, battery-powered vehicles are mentioned as a way to displace diesel and gasoline engines from Europe's roads. This is stated as: ""Battery-powered vehicles displace diesel and gasoline engines from Europe's roads, even if that doesn't please the AfD."" However, no further details about electric vehicles are provided in the text."};0;0;1;0;0;0;0;1;1;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;1;
"2022-03-09_10-18";"Julie Lechanteux";"ID";"
    Madam President, electric vehicle batteries are today produced in Asia. In 2020, the six leading global actors in the sector had captured 86% of the market and were all from China, South Korea, and Japan. This industrial choice should be highlighted, pointing out our dependence on it, which is supposedly ecological but is imposed on us and does not enjoy unanimity among experts, as electric batteries are polluting, whatever one says.
    The European Commissioner may talk about the circular economy, recycling, environmental constraints, but this supply chain raises many questions. The production of batteries is so energy-intensive that calling it green transition is a huge deception. In Swedish Lapland, to install a gigantic battery factory, a forest the size of 70 football fields was cleared. To produce batteries, phenomenal amounts of energy are needed. An example: to make a 50kW battery providing 400km of autonomy for a car, the factory consumes 3,500kW of electricity, which is 60 times more than necessary. In the midst of an energy crisis, this is absurd.
    Add to this the question of the toxicity of the raw materials that make up its composition: lead, mercury, lithium, and cobalt. It quickly becomes clear that we are dealing with highly dangerous products for our health and the environment. Resources whose extraction has been the subject of a UN report published in 2020 on the production of batteries for electric vehicles.
    A chapter of this report concerning the exploitation of cobalt, its social and environmental issues, raises many questions. The report, for example, states that most of the cobalt supplied on world markets comes from the Democratic Republic of Congo, with 20% coming from artisanal mines in the south of Katanga, where 40,000 children work. And there are numerous cases of non-compliance with human rights there.
    Finally, there is the issue of traceability through a battery passport, which poses a risk of data mining for drivers, with a clear violation of the right to privacy and consent from the vehicle owner.
    Faced with these major challenges, why not invest in biofuels and hydrogen, which could ensure energy independence at a lower social and environmental cost?"};"The speech mentions that:

* Electric vehicle batteries are produced mainly in Asia, with 86% of the market controlled by companies from China, South Korea, and Japan.
* The production of electric vehicle batteries is energy-intensive and polluting, despite being marketed as an ecological solution.
* The extraction of raw materials used to make electric vehicle batteries (lead, mercury, lithium, and cobalt) poses health and environmental risks.
* Cobalt, a key component in electric vehicle batteries, is often sourced from artisanal mines in the Democratic Republic of Congo where children work and human rights are violated.
* There is a risk of data mining for drivers through ""battery passports"", which could violate their right to privacy and consent.

Overall, the speech raises concerns about the environmental and social impact of electric vehicles, particularly with regards to battery production and sourcing."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;
"2022-03-09_10-20";"Sunčana Glavak";"EPP";"
    Dear Madam President, ladies and gentlemen, batteries are extremely important for European industrial competitiveness and the implementation of the Green Plan, of course the ambitious one. With technological development, the possibilities and performance of batteries increase, which further encourages, of course, their widespread use. It is estimated that the total volume of industrial batteries could rise to almost 4.4 million tons by 2035 compared to 0.7 million tons in 2020. Recognizing this importance, the European Union has invested 127 billion euros by 2021 and expects to invest an additional 382 billion euros by 2030. I applaud such ambition and encourage it. I welcome and commend the efforts of this report that sets a common set of rules for sustainability, safety, marking, and information related to battery use. Likewise, the report defines requirements for collecting, processing, and recycling used batteries. In this way, we strengthen the functioning of a single market, promote a circular economy, and reduce the ecological and social impact throughout all phases of the battery cycle. I would also like to take this opportunity to highlight a positive example from Croatia, where I come from. It is about the success of a young entrepreneur and innovator Mate Rimac, whose company Rimac Automobili produces high-quality batteries for the fastest electric car in the world, Nevera. Likewise, I applaud that the level of the European Union has recognized that innovators and those who are already living the green transition have financial support. The future has therefore already happened somewhere. Dear colleagues, the future will be increasingly driven by energy stored in batteries, and it is up to us to establish legislative foundations that will make them environmentally acceptable and, of course, economically profitable."};"According to the speech, Mate Rimac's company, Rimac Automobili, produces high-quality batteries for the ""fastest electric car in the world"", specifically the Nevera model. This is mentioned as a positive example from Croatia, where the speaker comes from.

That's the only mention of electric vehicles in the text."};0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;1;
"2022-03-09_10-22";"Dita Charanzová";"Renew";" – Madam President, the impact of the war in Ukraine is everywhere, even in relation to batteries. The war has already shut down the production of electric cars in a number of Member States, including the Czech Republic, due to the electric parts that go into connecting batteries to the vehicles being blocked. As vehicle manufacturers struggle to find new sources of supplies, we must prevent a similar problem in the future with the batteries themselves. That is why this legislation should help support better production and recycling in Europe, so that, in the future, we have a safe supply of raw and recycled materials. 
At the same time, this legislation must not be used as a tool against a global supply chain. When we are not faced with a crisis, the best source of many batteries and battery materials will continue to be outside the European Union. I firmly believe that we must work with other international players, including in the UN Economic Commission of Africa (ECA) Forum, as we implement this legislation towards making these rules universal and not for Europe alone. 
As we move towards a future of electric vehicles, the question of batteries will not be a question of AA or AAA batteries. We need a plan for what to do with these huge car and truck batteries. The car industry must be a partner in this and our laws must be able to be implemented. As we go into trilogues, I ask all sides to make sure this law will work in practice. Only if we work with the industry will we get this right. "};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned related to electric vehicles:

1. The war in Ukraine has already shut down the production of electric cars in some Member States (including the Czech Republic) due to blocked supplies of electric parts that connect batteries to vehicles.
2. As vehicle manufacturers struggle to find new sources of supplies, it is important to prevent a similar problem with battery production and recycling in Europe.
3. The legislation aims to support better production and recycling of raw and recycled materials for batteries, ensuring a safe supply in the future.
4. The speaker mentions that as we move towards a future of electric vehicles, there will be a need for a plan on what to do with huge car and truck batteries.
5. The car industry must be a partner in this effort, and laws must be implemented in practice.

Overall, the speech highlights the importance of ensuring a stable supply chain for electric vehicle production and recycling, particularly in light of the war in Ukraine's impact on global supplies."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;1;
"2022-03-09_10-23";"Manuela Ripa";"Greens/EFA";" - Madam President! Batteries are now an integral part of our daily lives, but batteries have become much more than just our everyday household products.
    The demand for batteries will increase rapidly in the coming years, especially in electric vehicles. Therefore, it was right and important to have a legislative proposal that does not only deal with used batteries and certain categories of batteries, but looks at the entire lifecycle of all batteries, from creation to end-of-life processing. This is all the more important as batteries are expected to play a crucial role in the mobility transition.
    However, batteries require many raw materials. Therefore, it was only logical to adopt a circular economy approach. Resources are finite. Their extraction must take place in compliance with human rights and environmental standards and should not endanger nature reserves. Not only were recycling quotas to be increased, but for true recycling of all resources, we also need a better collection system for all batteries and better battery designs. Recycling begins already at the stage of product manufacturing and must be thought of holistically.
    Just as important was it to extend the due diligence obligations of economic actors for human rights and our environment along the entire value creation chain, that is, on all batteries, all materials, including waste management. I am very pleased that we have been able to achieve this. We have also managed to restrict harmful substances in batteries.
    On a related note, I would like to highlight another aspect: In Europe, more and more battery factories are being built. These could be built on industrial brownfield sites but unfortunately are increasingly being planned on green spaces such as arable land or forests. It also includes that they are even being built in water protection areas. An example of this is Tesla in Brandenburg, Germany.
    We must not be blind to the loss of biodiversity and soil and water protection while fighting against climate change. To be sustainable, one must think holistically about sustainability. This legislative proposal is a good first step in this regard."};"According to the speech, batteries are expected to play a crucial role in the mobility transition, specifically in electric vehicles. This implies that the speaker believes that electric vehicles will be an important area of growth for battery demand in the coming years.

In other words, the speaker is highlighting the importance of batteries in the transition to electric vehicles as a key factor driving the increased demand for batteries."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;
"2022-03-09_10-24";"Annika Bruna";"ID";" - Madam President, this regulation aims to reduce the environmental and health impact of battery and cell usage. That is why we will support it. In addition, by increasing our requirements, particularly regarding electric vehicle batteries, we will avoid misleading advertising that presents these vehicles as more virtuous than they are. Consumer information on this issue will be significantly improved.
     The objectives of reuse and recycling of batteries or reusing raw materials are ambitious. This text is also a step towards the interoperability of all types of batteries. This will, on the one hand, allow consumers to save money (as they can reuse these batteries and keep their devices) and, on the other hand, reduce waste by creating standards that facilitate recycling. In this context, we also support the essential increase in collection objectives for used battery and cell waste. Furthermore, I would like to thank the rapporteur for taking into account the amendments submitted by myself and other colleagues in favor of a deposit system for batteries and cells. The Commission will study the feasibility and interest of this system, and I welcome this progress.
     Despite these positive points, several negative aspects must be highlighted. In particular, the regulation does not take serious account of the drama that is child labor. Several tens of thousands of children work in cobalt mines to supply battery production. At a time when an European regulation is concerned with the conditions of battery production, we cannot close our eyes. Amendments from the ID group will propose to refuse child labor for battery production used in Europe. I invite you, through your votes, to support them.
     Finally, while we share the ambitious objectives of this text for the development of sustainable batteries and the reuse of raw materials that compose them, we question the realism of a massive and rapid electrification. The electrification of heating systems, but especially vehicles in Europe, will require producing in the coming years hundreds of tera watt-hours additional electricity. And the consequences of the Russian-Ukrainian crisis will also weigh on energy supply.
     The production capacities of electric power of our nations will have to be multiplied. How do you plan to face this demand? This is not the role of this text, of course, to answer this question, but we know that making batteries cleaner to recharge them with coal-fired power plants is nonsense."};"According to the speech, the regulation aims to reduce the environmental and health impact of battery and cell usage, including electric vehicle batteries. The speaker mentions that by increasing requirements for electric vehicle batteries, they will avoid misleading advertising that presents these vehicles as more virtuous than they are. Additionally, consumer information on this issue will be significantly improved.

The speaker also notes that the regulation does not take serious account of child labor in cobalt mines to supply battery production and invites others to support amendments that propose to refuse child labor for battery production used in Europe.

Finally, the speaker questions the realism of a massive and rapid electrification of vehicles in Europe, citing the need to produce hundreds of tera watt-hours additional electricity and the impact of the Russian-Ukrainian crisis on energy supply."};0;0;1;0;0;0;1;1;1;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;
"2022-03-09_10-30";"Beata Mazurek";"ECR";"
    Madam President, esteemed Members! According to the estimates of the World Economic Forum, in order to accelerate the transition to a low-emission economy, global battery production must be increased by 19 times. Production and use of batteries, as well as handling used batteries, are cross-cutting issues that have an impact on many areas of policy. A report on batteries and used batteries should be a document that takes into account the economic and environmental conditions of all member states. Only such an approach will make it valuable for the European green transformation. It is necessary to consider whether the proposed changes may not limit innovation and, as a result, raise the price of batteries and accumulators, which could create a clear problem, especially in the transport sector.
    
    In connection with the observed sharp increases in fuel prices and the additional fee for road ETS proposed, the increase in battery prices will make it even more difficult for all citizens to switch to another form of transportation. For the sake of balanced development of all countries of the Union, there is a need to secure the interests of countries that are in the process of intensive transformation towards climate neutrality, so that batteries produced in these countries are as competitive as those produced in countries with a higher share of OECD in energy production. We must remember, especially in the current situation, that the development of the electric mobility market is not only an issue of great economic importance but also a strategically important issue from the point of view of security."};"The speech mentions electric vehicles (EVs) indirectly, specifically in the context of ""transport sector"" and ""electric mobility market"". Here's a summary:

* The speaker notes that an increase in battery prices could create a problem for the transport sector, making it more difficult for citizens to switch to another form of transportation.
* This implies that electric vehicles rely on batteries and that their adoption is hindered by high battery costs.
* The speaker also mentions the development of the ""electric mobility market"" as a strategically important issue from the point of view of security.

Overall, the text highlights the importance of affordable batteries for the widespread adoption of electric vehicles, which is crucial for achieving climate neutrality."};0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;
"2022-03-09_10-33";"Susana Solís Pérez";"Renew";"
    Madam President, Commissioner, the European Union has set itself the goal of being a benchmark in the battery industry. A key piece in our fight for strategic autonomy. 
    By 2030, we want 30 million electric vehicles to circulate on our roads, and these figures imply an exponential increase in strategic materials such as lithium, cobalt, manganese, nickel, of which Europe is poor and from which we depend completely on imports. Already in 2020, we will need 18 times more lithium or 5 times more cobalt.
    Therefore, if we want to guarantee our strategic autonomy, we need to incentivize and develop an industry in Europe that uses the principles of the circular economy as a main lever. And for this, we need a regulatory framework, new rules of the game that ensure regulation and legal certainty throughout the entire value chain.
    And this is what today's proposal provides. We legislate comprehensively on the entire life cycle of the product, from its design to the end of its useful life so that batteries are more sustainable and more competitive. I believe it is an ambitious proposal. It introduces requirements for the content of recycled material in batteries, more ambitious collection measures, we regulate the second life of electric vehicle batteries, the millions of batteries we will have so they can have other uses, and a battery passport is implemented that reflects its carbon footprint so that its environmental impact is also transparent.
    Of course, environmental sustainability must go hand in hand with the social dimension. It is necessary to ensure the elimination of abuses of workers and the use of child labor in mines.
    Thank you, Commissioner. I believe that with this legislation today we take a big step. We are ambitious and give a strong signal in Europe to accelerate our energy independence."};"According to the speech, by 2030, it is expected that there will be 30 million electric vehicles circulating on European roads. This implies an exponential increase in strategic materials such as lithium, cobalt, manganese, and nickel, which Europe currently imports completely due to its lack of these resources.

Additionally, the proposal aims to regulate the second life of electric vehicle batteries, allowing them to have other uses after their initial purpose is fulfilled. A battery passport will also be implemented, which reflects the carbon footprint of each battery, making its environmental impact transparent."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;1;
"2022-03-09_10-34";"Ciarán Cuffe";"Greens/EFA";" – Madam President, this proposal on batteries is welcome and timely. In the last two weeks, the rulebook on energy has been rewritten. The goals of geopolitics and the climate movement now converge on the need to phase out fossil fuels. As we move towards electrification in all spheres, batteries will play a crucial role in weaning ourselves off fossil fuels, including Russian sources, and this will result in healthier communities with cleaner air. 
And with transport, we shouldn’t just promote a private electric vehicle for everyone. The resources required would be enormous, and it wouldn’t solve issues like congestion and road safety. So instead, let’s allocate the required rare earths and minerals smartly, for example, by electrifying public transport as part of our modal shift efforts. 
And I strongly welcome the Parliament’s position on the batteries in waste batteries regulation. I welcome the expansionist scope to cover all batteries. The strengthening of the right to repair and removability requirements and provisions on due diligence and supply chains. 
A cleaner mobility transition must not come at the expense of decent working conditions elsewhere, however. But Europe can lead the battery revolution, and it has a chance to do so fairly."};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned related to electric vehicles:

1. The proposal on batteries is welcome and timely as it will help phase out fossil fuels, including Russian sources.
2. Electrification of transport is important for healthier communities with cleaner air.
3. Promoting private electric vehicles for everyone is not a solution because it would require enormous resources and wouldn't solve issues like congestion and road safety.
4. Instead, the speaker suggests allocating rare earths and minerals smartly by electrifying public transport as part of modal shift efforts.

In summary, the speech highlights the importance of batteries in the transition to cleaner mobility, but also emphasizes that promoting private electric vehicles is not a viable solution. The speaker suggests focusing on electrifying public transport as a more effective way to achieve this goal."};0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;1;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;
"2022-03-09_10-35";"Adam Bielan";"ECR";" – Madam President, the regulation modernises the EU’s regulatory framework for batteries and aims, among other things, at strengthening the internal market, while reducing the environmental impact of batteries. 
Although I support the original intentions of this regulation, I believe the final position of the European Parliament is too ambitious and may prove not to be realistic. Without the right balance, it could hinder innovation and eventually increase battery prices. This is especially important as, by 2030, at least 30 million zero—emission electric vehicles are expected to be on EU roads. Too high environmental and social standards, combined with shorter deadlines, risk hindering customers choice to switch to zero—emission vehicles. Consequently, new, greener and more ethical batteries would ultimately, and paradoxically, not become an effective tool to combat climate change. We need to use the leverage of the internal market to establish an EU world—leading competitive cell battery industry and reduce our dependency on other parts of the world. I fear that this legislation, as it stands, could weaken the desired result. 
Despite my reluctance regarding some proposals in the final text, I nevertheless welcome the fact that the issues and risks related to the manufacturing of batteries are addressed in the regulation, including child labour and other human rights violations. "};"According to the speech, by 2030, at least 30 million zero-emission electric vehicles are expected to be on EU roads. This means that there will be a significant increase in the number of electric vehicles on European roads within the next decade.

Additionally, it is mentioned that customers may not switch to zero-emission vehicles if the environmental and social standards are too high and deadlines are shorter, which could hinder the adoption of electric vehicles.

That's all the information about electric vehicles mentioned in the speech."};0;0;0;1;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;1;0;
"2022-03-09_10-36";"Seán Kelly";"EPP";" – Madam President, batteries are everywhere in today’s world, and demand is only going to increase with the rise in electric mobility and our ever-growing reliance on handheld devices. 
Sustainable batteries and vehicles underpin the mobility of the future, and swift progress is crucial to enhancing the sustainability of the emerging battery value chain. The current battery supply chain is not very sustainable, although batteries are highly recyclable due to the nature of the critical materials inside of them. Cells often travel more than 20 000 miles from mines to manufacturing facilities. 
A significant shortage of supply for battery materials is also looming in the near future. Therefore, it is imperative that we put the framework in place to boost the reconditioning of batteries for reuse. New measures for batteries are crucial for the transition to a circular and climate-neutral economy. 
We must also make it easier and safer for consumers and independent operators to remove or replace portable batteries, such as those in smartphones, which often contain integrated batteries. It is crucial we solve this waste-to-scrap problem. There is an opportunity to link recycling, solving the end-of-life problem, with the supply chain, allowing us to bring more materials back into the feedstock so as not to bottleneck battery production. 
Setting green criteria for batteries sold in Europe will boost domestic production and help the continent to take its place as a centre of excellence for battery production and adoption of a circular economy."};"According to the speech, electric mobility is mentioned as one of the factors driving the demand for batteries, which will only increase in the future. This implies that the growth of electric vehicles (EVs) is expected to contribute to the rising demand for batteries.

Additionally, the speech mentions that sustainable batteries and vehicles are crucial for the mobility of the future, suggesting that EVs play a key role in this vision for the future. However, it does not provide any further details about electric vehicles themselves, such as their adoption rates, infrastructure development, or environmental benefits. The focus is primarily on the battery supply chain and recycling efforts to support the growth of electric mobility."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;1;
"2022-03-09_10-37";"Christel Schaldemose";"S&D";"
    Mr. President! In 1991, batteries were something we put in remote controls, in alarm clocks, and in Walkmans. Today, we have batteries for everything from mobile phones to electric bicycles and electric cars, not to mention batteries in industry. And the consumption of batteries is not decreasing for now. It is important for our green transition that more and more things will be powered by electricity in the future - and therefore also by batteries. In fact, global demand for batteries in 2030 is expected to be 14 times higher than today, and 17% of this demand will come from the EU.
    And batteries don't grow on trees. Many of the ingredients in batteries come from mining, and often we have limited resources available. Therefore, it goes without saying that we will have to ensure a much better use of our batteries. We need to reuse them, and that is why it is also good that, with the help of the European Parliament's report, we have managed to include more types of batteries, both from households and from industry. Many more than the Commission had originally proposed. It is important that the majority of batteries are covered. At the same time, we also ensure that the requirements for hazardous chemicals remain in battery legislation. We establish standards for chargers, and we secure labeling of CO2, etc. We have achieved a lot. If it stands with the European Parliament, we will have a European battery legislation that covers the entire life of the battery. It is circular economy at its best."};"According to the speech, electric vehicles are mentioned as one of the applications of batteries that have become more widespread over time. The speaker states: ""Today, we have batteries for everything from mobile phones to electric bicycles and electric cars...""

This is the only mention of electric vehicles in the text. There is no further information provided about electric vehicles, such as their impact on the environment, their adoption rates, or any specific policies related to them."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;
"2022-03-09_10-38";"Mauri Pekkarinen";"Renew";"
    Dear Mr. Speaker, the battery directive provides a good framework for measures that the European Union is taking towards electric mobility. However, many gaps still need to be filled.
    
    One challenge is raw materials for battery industry. We should recycle and reuse as much as possible, but we also need vast amounts of external raw materials. Some of these have already been identified two years ago by the Commission as critical raw materials. Special concerns are related to cobalt, lithium, and nickel. Their availability and their sustainable and environmentally friendly production.
    
    The European Union's own battery raw material production is not enough. The ongoing illegal war worsens the situation. Russia is the largest producer of nickel. We know the effects on the global nickel market. Availability decreases and prices rise.
    
    The Commission should also quickly prepare a new assessment taking into account the supply chain of raw materials. How can the delivery of raw materials be guaranteed? And how could Europe, with its own, sustainable, and citizen-accepted mining and quarrying industry, become more efficient, faster, and more productive?"};"The speech mentions electric vehicles indirectly by referring to ""electric mobility"" as one of the measures being taken by the European Union through the battery directive. However, it does not provide any specific details about electric vehicles themselves.

Instead, the focus is on the raw materials needed for the production of batteries, which are essential for electric vehicles. The speaker highlights the challenges related to the availability and sustainable production of cobalt, lithium, and nickel, which are critical raw materials for the battery industry. They also mention that Europe's own battery raw material production is not enough and that the ongoing conflict in Ukraine has worsened the situation by affecting the global nickel market.

Overall, the speech is more concerned with the supply chain and sustainability of raw materials needed for electric vehicles rather than the vehicles themselves."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;1;
"2022-03-09_10-39";"Henrike Hahn";"Greens/EFA";"
    Madam President! Putin's attack on Ukraine once again starkly highlights how problematic the supply of energy and raw materials can be in Europe. Therefore, we urgently need substitution and a circular economy with functioning markets for recycled critical raw materials in Europe. The battery regulation is now an important step in the right direction. The right to repair, sustainability criteria, due diligence for batteries, the value chain with a clear view on social and ecological standards, and a mandatory share of recycled raw materials such as lithium are part of the demand of the European Parliament and are a real success. Critical raw materials can contribute to green technologies for reducing greenhouse gases. We all know the much-discussed example of electric vehicles that, of course, also need lithium batteries. The battery regulation will now help us in Europe to develop alternatives to the increasing environmentally harmful extraction of raw materials. A European industry with green production technologies, embedded in a circular economy, is possible, and a circular economy is necessary from an industrial policy perspective, from a climate and environmental policy perspective, and now also in view of the war in Europe from a geopolitical perspective."};"According to the speech, electric vehicles are mentioned as an example of how they need lithium batteries. The speaker states that ""of course"" electric vehicles also require lithium batteries, implying that lithium is a critical raw material for their production.

In other words, the text does not provide any additional information about electric vehicles beyond this brief mention of their dependence on lithium batteries."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;
"2022-03-09_10-44";"Jiří Pospíšil";"EPP";"
    Madam President, ladies and gentlemen, I would like to contribute to this rich debate and also support this regulation proposal. I agree with what my colleagues said in defense and support of this proposal during the long debate. For me personally - besides the environmental reasons - there is a very strong geopolitical reason that we all feel and that is being debated at various points during this session of the European Parliament, and it concerns the fact that we should greatly limit the extraction of raw materials from Russia in the future, thereby weakening Putin's dictatorship's influence on European countries. I would be in favor of the fastest possible limitation of the extraction of these raw materials. Some are in favor of a slower limitation, but we all agree that dependence on Russia is bad, and this regulation, which concerns batteries, certainly contributes to it in its part.
    As I said, I strongly support this proposal because with the development of our green policy, with the development of electric mobility, it is expected that there will be a need for up to 19 times more batteries in the future than are currently in use. And when we look at the current problems that some of you have pointed out, such as battery recycling, which does not work very well in practice, about half of the batteries are recycled, and half are not, so it is really necessary to adopt stricter rules that would promote recycling. I consider this regulation to be good, there is a whole range of positive things next to it, such as battery recycling specifications, the issue of charging batteries, interoperability of individual chargers. These are all concrete practical provisions, which, if we can implement them in practice, I am convinced that we will better handle the issue of batteries in the new world of electric mobility, so I support this regulation."};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned related to electric vehicles:

1. The development of electric mobility is expected to lead to a significant increase in demand for batteries, with up to 19 times more batteries needed in the future compared to current usage.
2. The regulation proposal aims to promote battery recycling, as currently only about half of used batteries are recycled and the other half are not.
3. The regulation includes specifications for battery recycling, charging batteries, and interoperability of individual chargers, which are considered practical provisions that can help better handle the issue of batteries in the new world of electric mobility.

These points highlight the importance of developing a sustainable and efficient battery management system to support the growth of electric vehicles and reduce dependence on Russia's raw materials."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;
"2022-03-09_10-45";"César Luena";"S&D";"
    Madam President, dear Commissioner, I join the congratulations being offered to the rapporteur and also to the alternative rapporteurs.
    The ecologization of batteries intended by this Regulation is essential in the transition to green energy. We are already seeing an increase in demand for batteries, and electrification of the transport sector will lead to a greater increase - it's clear - in their use in electric vehicles. 
    The year 2035 is the year planned by the Commission to eliminate internal combustion engines from cars and vans, and there are more and more alternative means of transport - such as electric scooters - and increasing dependence on portable electronic devices. 
    Therefore, we must be ambitious in setting carbon emission limits for battery production and in obliging Member States - also for manufacturers - to collect and use recycled content. This last point is important given the possible lithium deficits in the market, which we are already seeing. Last year, while global sales of electric cars reached a record high, up 108% compared to 2020, lithium needs increased by 25%, but worldwide production only rose by 21%. We have the problem here already. 
    Batteries have become a strategic industry at the global level and, in these times we live in, energy supply is crucial. Batteries will play an important role in the necessary stability of the energy system, as they can store and distribute renewable energy when the sun does not shine or when there is no wind. 
    For all this, we support the excellent work, we support the excellent report, and advocate that this Regulation can and must turn the European Union into a continent that leads in sustainable matters. Congratulations!"};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned related to electric vehicles:

1. The electrification of the transport sector will lead to an increase in the use of batteries in electric vehicles.
2. It is planned by the Commission that internal combustion engines will be eliminated from cars and vans by 2035.

These two points highlight the growing importance of electric vehicles as a key area for the development and use of batteries, which is essential for the transition to green energy."};0;0;1;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;1;
"2022-03-09_10-47";"Miapetra Kumpula-Natri";"S&D";" – Madam President, batteries are a crucial element for our green transition and the new circular economy. As renewable energy sources become more and more important, batteries have a key role in balancing the grid. They are key in electromobility, transforming the transportation sector to carbon neutral. Demand for batteries will dramatically increase in coming years as the whole energy system is also transforming. As mentioned here, war in Ukraine will have an impact on this as well. 
How can we guarantee sources when the trade and material chains are breaking globally? I think the Commission has worked hard since the last Commission period and continued today by Commissioner Šefčovič and now, Commission, is still no time to sleep. This is a great piece of legislation with regard to the sustainability and also the source of materials as the best source is recycled once used materials. But have you mapped, have you looked at what we have in our soils? There is a lot of potential. I know in my country there are unused sources for cobalt, graphite and lithium with sustainable working conditions. 
If we still need to import from other countries, do we now have security that they pay due diligence duties and that it is ecologically and also sustainably sourced so that battery industries can trust that due diligence covers human rights as well? I think Europe can become an important player in the battery industry by creating a battery ecosystem based on the sustainability requirements and excellent research and innovation and by incorporating values. "};"According to the speech, electric vehicles are mentioned as part of ""electromobility"", which is described as transforming the transportation sector to carbon neutral. This implies that electric vehicles are playing a crucial role in reducing greenhouse gas emissions from transportation.

The speaker also mentions that demand for batteries will increase dramatically in coming years due to the growth of electromobility, highlighting the importance of battery production and sustainability in the context of electric vehicles.

That's the summary!"};0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;1;
"2022-03-09_10-51";"Simona Bonafè";"NA";" Speaker – Madam President, esteemed colleagues, in this moment that I lack, I would first like to thank all the colleagues who have intervened today in this beautiful debate, I also want to thank Commissioner Sinkevičius for his support over these months and, above all, I want to thank the rapporteurs of the IMCO, TRAN and ITRE committees for our joint work and the shadow rapporteurs of the ENVI committee, with whom there has been excellent cooperation.
    We have all said it: this regulation was already important before, for the reasons that have been well explained, but the war in Ukraine has made this file even more strategic, because we have realized how important it is to focus on the productive autonomy of central sectors for our development and competitiveness, I think about energy but also about batteries, since after all these two sectors are closely linked.
    And then, to the few colleagues who asked here to stop, to abandon the ecological transition, the energy transition, just because we do not have raw materials to use for batteries, and therefore for our energy autonomy, I ask if we should, by chance, go back to the telephone with tokens, since batteries are not only for electric mobility but also for our mobile phones.
    And then I wonder if this ideological approach does not belong to those who defend this regulation, but instead it belongs to those who do not want to see that this regulation is exactly the answer to dependence on other countries, because it increases recycling rates, because it strengthens European production chains and, at the same time, aims for dual quality and human health protection. And then I say that not only must we not stop, but we must obviously run."};"According to the speech, batteries are mentioned as being closely linked to energy sectors. It is stated that batteries are not only used for ""electric mobility"" (referring to electric vehicles) but also for mobile phones.

The speaker uses this point to argue against those who suggest abandoning the ecological transition and energy transition due to a lack of raw materials for batteries, saying that it would be equivalent to going back to using tokens in telephones. This is presented as an absurd idea, implying that the suggestion to abandon the transition is misguided.

Overall, the text does not provide detailed information about electric vehicles themselves, but rather uses them as an example of one application of battery technology."};0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;1;
"2022-04-07_3-3";"Peter Pollák";"EPP";"
    For the PPE group. - Dear Mr. President, the last ten years have shown that having ambitions, strategies, or even money is not enough.
    
    On one hand, Europe shows trends in the field of artificial intelligence, robotics, and even space programs, on the other hand, it is unable to provide drinking water to European regions where poor Roma drink water from a stream in the 21st century. We are capable of developing cutting-edge technologies, but we cannot give education to Romanian children. We can create millions of jobs, but we cannot give work to Europeans of Roma origin. We can achieve what seemed impossible before, but we cannot fulfill the dreams of Roma children.
    
    I am a co-author of several resolutions that deal with respecting human rights in countries outside the European Union. On one hand, we see the suffering of the weak and helpless there, and on the other hand, we tolerate catastrophic living conditions for our own Roma Europeans for too long.
    
    I repeatedly emphasize that we have a huge number of children without education, parents without work, and that educational systems in many countries are not able to prepare Roma children for the labor market. Today, we know where the tipping point is. We have plans, even money. However, the situation has not improved, so it must be acknowledged that ambitions, good intentions, and strategies alone are doomed to fail.
    
    We see how many communities successfully draw European funds for cycle paths, electric cars, cultural centers, but when it comes to projects for Roma, everything stops. The rise of racism and fascism is also due to the long-term inability to implement European Union plans and member countries in European towns and cities.
    
    We stand at the threshold of a new decade. It is our responsibility to ensure that plans do not remain only on paper but feel for Roma children, as well as people living near Roma communities. Dear Mr. President, we cannot ignore the dreams of Roma children any longer. After all, Roma children are also European children."};"According to the speech, it is mentioned that some communities successfully draw European funds for ""cycle paths, electric cars, cultural centers"". This implies that these communities are using European Union funding to develop infrastructure related to cycling and electric vehicles. However, the speaker notes that when it comes to projects benefiting Roma communities, everything stops, implying that there is a disparity in how EU funds are allocated between different groups."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2022-04-07_3-40";"Robert Hajšel";"S&D";"
    Dear Mr. President, the situation of marginalized communities in the European Union is a very serious problem. The pandemic of coronavirus has significantly contributed to further exacerbating poverty, social exclusion, and the health status of disadvantaged communities of citizens. In such countries like mine, Slovakia, these poor conditions can be further aggravated by the consequences of sanctions on energy sources from Russia. We are talking today about electric cars, digitalization, but this morning in the EU 30% of Roma living in households without access to drinking water were woken up. This is unacceptable in the 21st century and we cannot talk about solidarity or European values or a social Europe.
    
    I am glad that the Commissioner also emphasized today that 80% of Roma in the EU live below the poverty line. In my region, on Slovakia, to this day there are 50 Roma families completely without access to water sources and together with about 500 other families have access only to public water supply or a well. I personally know dozens of Roma families and their everyday social problems, and trust me, they are serious.
    
    Imagine that the Slovak government, despite its promises of more effective use of European funds until the end of 2023, will most likely have to return more than two-thirds of the money from the Operational Program Human Resources. It is likely that we will lose more than 250 million euros, which could also benefit disadvantaged Roma communities. Madam Commissioner, something must be done about this."};"According to the speech, electric cars are mentioned as one of the topics being discussed today in the EU. However, it is not elaborated on further or any specific details are provided about electric vehicles. The mention of electric cars seems to be a passing reference, and the main focus of the speech is on the issues faced by marginalized communities, particularly Roma people, in Slovakia and the EU."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;
"2022-05-19_5-37";"Grzegorz Tobiszowski";"ECR";"
    Madam President! Madam Commissioner! Dear Members of Parliament! The most important thing in any action is a proper assessment of the situation and diagnosis. This forms the foundation of every action, every invention. Today we are talking about the energy crisis in the context of Russia's aggression against Ukraine. But please, the crisis began before the aggression, and we must diagnose what was the reason that the pandemic caused, that the current policy, even being spoken today from this podium, must be intensified. The pandemic experienced a crisis, and Russian aggression aggravated it. And if we want to take responsibility for future generations, for those people who are young today, we must more strongly diagnose what is the cause. Because if only we say that we should increase renewable energy sources, why don't we understand this if it is so simple? The problem is deeper, the problem is more important. We want electric cars - and that is a legitimate claim - but after all, in ninety percent of cases, we import raw materials for these cars, for their batteries. I think we should ask ourselves: what climate package with all legal acts is so good for Europe and builds our future energy, but why does it not build our energy security today for us and the young and current generations? We must diagnose this better and decide that countries can propose what potential they have and on what they want to build first their energy security, in order to make a bypass in time, to develop new technologies and strength in renewable energy sources."};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned related to electric vehicles:

1. The speaker mentions that ""we want electric cars"" which is a legitimate claim.
2. However, they also point out that in 90% of cases, raw materials for these cars and their batteries are imported.

That's all the information provided about electric vehicles in the text."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;
"2022-06-07_2-8";"Silvia Sardone";"ID";"
    In the name of the ID group. - Madam President, honorable colleagues, in a context of war, crisis, serious difficulties for businesses and families, how do you respond? With a package of measures that is pure utopian green and does not absolutely answer the European problems at all.
    The perspective you are giving us is made up of new European taxes, a conversion towards electric cars that eliminates entire supply chains, new businesses that will be on their knees due to new taxes related to energy efficiency that will affect both companies and citizens, new conditions and new obligations that entrepreneurs will not be able to bear.
    Faced with your errors on energy, you respond with further wrong strategies that risk causing huge economic and social damage. The European Union contributes to about 8-9% of global CO2 emissions but behave as if Europe has a much higher quota. It is absurd! The European plans, without support for businesses and without incentives for investment, risk compromising our competitiveness.
    Furthermore, I must say that the horizon of the electric transition puts at risk the employment of entire sectors of the automotive industry. Relying on a technology completely in the hands of the Chinese, who control 80% of the raw materials necessary to produce batteries, is a huge mistake. The Internal Market Commissioner Breton has admitted, I must say with several months of delay, that the transition to electric cars could mean hundreds of thousands of jobs destroyed along the supply chain. Well, there you have it! And all this while energy surcharges and raw materials are burying companies. Europe is building a future that will find us subject to the giant Asian one: it is not what European citizens ask for.
    I used to hear someone say that with this vote we would change history. Unfortunately, history has already changed and you have chosen not to be on the side of European citizens."};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned related to electric vehicles:

1. The speaker criticizes the plan to convert towards electric cars, stating that it will eliminate entire supply chains.
2. The speaker claims that new taxes related to energy efficiency will affect both companies and citizens, which will put entrepreneurs on their knees.
3. The speaker mentions that relying on a technology completely in the hands of the Chinese (who control 80% of the raw materials necessary to produce batteries) is a huge mistake.
4. The Internal Market Commissioner Breton has admitted (with several months of delay) that the transition to electric cars could mean hundreds of thousands of jobs destroyed along the supply chain.

Overall, the speaker's tone is critical and skeptical towards the plan to promote electric vehicles, citing concerns about job losses, supply chains, and dependence on Chinese technology."};0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;
"2022-06-07_2-39";"Michael Bloss";"Greens/EFA";"
    Mr. President, dear Mr. Manfred Weber, dear colleagues of the EPP group! When you were last in the Bavarian Forest, did you see the many trees that have dried up and fallen over? I ask you: How do you explain to your female and male voters that the forests are dying right outside their front doors, and that tomorrow you will vote against a climate policy that puts an end to this?
    
    Mr. Stéphane Séjourné, dear Liberals, Pascal, France has just survived its warmest and driest May since records began. Water bottles have been rationed to supply your fellow citizens in an emergency. In France, nuclear power plants have to be shut down because there is not enough cooling water. How do you explain this to your female and male voters when tomorrow, together with the Conservatives and the Right of Marine Le Pen, you vote against a climate emergency - that very climate emergency we declared here almost two years ago, after extreme droughts, forest deaths, and temperature records?
    
    I challenge you: End the fossil alliance in the European Parliament! Let's build European sovereignty, which we all dream of together! Break free from Putin's fossil shackles with Europe's newest climate technologies: sun and wind power, battery factories, and heat pumps. Carbon trading can achieve this. If CO2 has a high price, then in 2030 we can get out of coal. Modernize our European economy! Those who operate cleanly will be rewarded, and then the CO2 pollution party will finally end. Let's build the best electric cars and high-speed trains made in Europe, and let's set the framework for this: 2035, finally out of the combustion engine!
    
    Don't protect what is long gone! Build on what will bloom! Mr. Weber, Mr. Séjourné, stand on the right side of history tomorrow! (The speaker agrees to answer a question by means of the ""blue card"" procedure)"};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned related to electric vehicles:

1. The speaker suggests building ""the best electric cars made in Europe"".
2. It is stated that by 2035, it is possible to ""finally out of the combustion engine"", implying a transition to electric vehicles.

These two points indicate that the speaker is advocating for the development and adoption of electric vehicles as part of a broader effort to modernize the European economy and reduce carbon emissions."};0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2022-06-07_2-49";"Petar Vitanov";"S&D";" – Madam President, Mr Commissioner, tomorrow we may have perhaps the most important vote within this mandate. The most important vote on how to achieve the transformation of the European economy so that we can achieve the set climate goals.
    While we talk about climate neutrality and reducing emissions, many of the poorest citizens of the member states wonder if they will have jobs tomorrow, how they will pay their bills for electricity and how they will cover their basic living expenses. For these people, the Green Deal is synonymous with uncertainty, an unclear change that will make them poorer than they are now. They do not consider buying electric cars and solar panels, as even insulating their homes is an investment they have to save for years.
    Let us not forget these people when we pave the way for change today, shaping the laws according to which it will happen. Let us not allow the poor to become poorer. And I am convinced that achieving climate goals should not be at the expense of the most vulnerable, their incomes and their jobs.
    I also hope that the Social Climate Fund will be a guarantee for this. It must allow all European citizens to benefit from the funds generated by climate policies. The revenues from emissions trading, which are currently spent non-transparently, can become an effective tool against energy poverty.
"};"According to the speech, it is mentioned that ""many of the poorest citizens of the member states"" do not consider buying ""electric cars"" as even insulating their homes is an investment they have to save for years. This implies that electric vehicles are one of the potential solutions or investments that these individuals may be hesitant to make due to financial constraints."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;
"2022-06-07_2-57";"Klára Dobrev";"S&D";"
    Dear Madam President! How can one govern well, how can good decisions be made? Every honest politician must answer these questions, these issues must be addressed. I suggest to you, my fellow representatives, that when voting, the faces of those Europeans should be in front of you, the faces of those millions who live from wages or salaries, who struggle every month to pay all their bills. The faces of those who do not buy an electric car or do not live in a passive house because they cannot afford it, but because when their boiler breaks down, or because they have to buy new shoes for their children, it causes them problems. When making decisions, these decisions must be made in such a way that their faces are before our eyes. Only then will we be successful in the fight against climate change, only then will we be successful in creating Europe's energy independence, if we think of them, if we fight together with them, if we go through this path together.
    The creation of the European Social Climate Fund is a historic act in this regard. It is a historic act because it also shows that Europe has learned from its mistakes, it has learned after the 2008-2009 economic crisis that we can only build a strong, competitive world if we directly help people to become competitive and strong themselves. That is why I ask them to vote for the creation of the European Social Climate Fund, and let's create it in such a way that we help those people who have problems paying their bills every day in their everyday lives. Help them and do not put the burden on them. This will be a historic test for us, and this is how we will learn to govern well and make good decisions."};"According to the speech, it is mentioned that some Europeans do not buy an ""electric car"" because they cannot afford it. This is mentioned as one of the struggles that people face every month when paying their bills. The speaker uses this example to emphasize the importance of considering the faces and struggles of ordinary Europeans when making decisions, in order to successfully fight against climate change and create Europe's energy independence."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;
"2022-06-07_2-68";"Marie-Pierre Vedrenne";"Renew";"
    Madam President, Vice-President, dear colleagues, there is no ecological transition without social justice. It is our compass. And this Social Climate Fund is proof of it. From the revision of the European carbon market to the implementation of the carbon adjustment mechanism at the borders, adopting this climate package will have consequences, and there can be no strong climate ambition, as we propose today, without being alongside the most vulnerable and the most modest.
    
    And this fund will be an instrument to fight simultaneously against precariousness and greenhouse gas emissions. Our objective must be double. On the one hand, to financially support those most exposed to the energy crisis today, and on the other hand, to accompany them in the next decade to invest and finance this transition.
    
    This is a lever for human-scale investments, to insulate our buildings, whether we are owners or tenants, to change our boilers, to promote access to soft mobility. Check energy, grant for renovation, aid for the purchase of electric vehicles, financial support for public transport. Concretely, this is what the fund will finance. And from 2024. And the rules must be clear. European money must go to those who really need it. The most modest households, very small businesses, our craftsmen and small traders.
    
    While some, specifically at the national level, declare themselves champions of purchasing power, they will vote tomorrow against a European fund that combines climate ambition and social justice. While we, our promise to leave no one behind, we will assume it to the end and we will advance Europe on all fronts."};"According to the speech, the Social Climate Fund will finance ""aid for the purchase of electric vehicles"". This means that one of the ways the fund will support people is by providing financial assistance to help them buy electric vehicles."};0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;
"2022-06-07_2-91";"Guido Reil";"ID";"
    - Madam President, dear colleagues! Today we are talking about the European Climate Social Fund. That means we are discussing the consequences of the Green Deal for people. And it becomes clear that the Green Deal is not only neither green nor a deal, no, much more: it is anti-social, it drives people into poverty, and it leads to social unrest.
    Why do I say that? Gradually, the financial burdens for the people are becoming clearer. Gradually we have exact figures. The expansion of the emissions trading alone in the areas of transport and housing leads to an additional burden for European households of 1112 billion euros. I repeat: 1112 billion euros. And to offset this burden, this social fund is introduced. It will be funded with 144 billion euros, which should then solve the problems. The only problem is that this money will not go to the poorest of the poor - in other words, only a very few people who can actually afford their heating costs. No, here again, buyers of electric cars are to be promoted and supported. All of this cannot be true.
    In view of the crisis, we know: We need secure and affordable energy, and it comes from coal and nuclear power. We need a renaissance of coal and nuclear power, and the Green Deal belongs in the trash."};"According to the speech, it is mentioned that buyers of electric cars are to be promoted and supported as part of the European Climate Social Fund. This means that some portion of the 144 billion euros allocated for the social fund will go towards supporting or incentivizing the purchase of electric vehicles."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;
"2022-06-07_2-98";"Ladislav Ilčić";"ECR";" – Dear Chairman, dear colleagues, we indeed need renewable energy sources because they are better for both people and the environment. However, we will not achieve this through a dogmatic approach, coercion, and prohibitions. So who will take care of all the internal combustion engine cars if we ban them? Where will we get raw materials for new electric cars with batteries? What about used and faulty batteries?
    I am pleased with the development of electric cars, but I wonder how long their durability will be, considering that the battery capacity decreases with each charge, and a new one costs as much as half a car. How many people can afford this?
    In addition, where will all that electricity come from for all these electric cars? From thermal power plants?
    Green transition is like driving a car. It's not the fastest way, but it's not the best either because you can easily go off course, and that could happen to us too. If we force things, we might do more harm than good. Therefore, changes are good and necessary, but we need to implement them at a realistic pace."};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned related to electric vehicles:

1. The speaker mentions that there will be a need for raw materials for new electric cars with batteries if internal combustion engine cars are banned.
2. The speaker questions what will happen to used and faulty batteries from electric cars.
3. The speaker expresses concerns about the durability of electric cars, citing that battery capacity decreases with each charge and a new battery costs as much as half a car. They wonder how many people can afford this.
4. The speaker asks where all the electricity will come from for all these electric cars, implying that it may not be possible to generate enough electricity from thermal power plants.

Overall, the speaker is expressing concerns about the practicality and feasibility of transitioning to electric vehicles, particularly in terms of the availability of resources and the affordability of new batteries."};0;0;0;1;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;1;1;
"2022-06-07_2-111";"Cindy Franssen";"EPP";"
    Chairman, Commissioner, colleagues, it is an open door to step through when I say that we will vote on a historic package of measures this week. To continue the path towards a climate-neutral continent, we must be ambitious and social. A broader emissions trading system, a carbon tax at our European external border and climate-neutral vehicles. And in Belgium, we sharpen our ambition for this last one even more.
    But colleagues, we must also stand still before the reality. Many families have difficulty providing their homes with sufficient energy. The exorbitant increases in energy prices, the consequences of the war in Ukraine and the higher prices post-corona hit low incomes and middle-low incomes hardest.
    The climate transition must be for everyone, not only for those who can afford it. Not everyone has the financial space to renovate a house or invest in an electric car. That is why the Social Climate Fund is so important. Because colleagues, the climate transition will be social or not at all."};"According to the speech, it is mentioned that ""climate-neutral vehicles"" are part of the package of measures being voted on. Additionally, it is stated that Belgium will sharpen its ambition for this goal even more.

There is no specific mention of electric vehicles per se, but given the context and the phrase ""climate-neutral vehicles"", it can be inferred that electric vehicles might be one type of vehicle being referred to. However, the text does not provide further details or specifications about electric vehicles."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;
"2022-06-07_2-133";"Frans Timmermans";"NA";" Executive Vice-President of the Commission. – Mr President, with all the political differences we have, with all the different angles you could have on this issue, my plea before you today would be ‘at least agree’. Let’s agree on the science. At least let’s agree that what the International Climate Panel has written is extremely alarming. At least let’s agree that whatever our difficulties may be, the climate crisis is not going to go away, it’s going to intensify. And the longer we procrastinate, the more intensive it will be.
That is not ideology, ladies and gentlemen, that is science. Then ideology comes in and then you make the choices you want to make. But I would hold before you today: denying science, that’s ideology. Denying science: that is using ideology to deny our children and grandchildren a safe future. By protecting – so-called ‘protecting’ – what you have today, who will suffer most if we procrastinate?
It is the poorest people in society, it is the people who have nowhere else to go. It is the small businesses. It is the farmers. These people will suffer most the longer we take to do what is needed. Rich people can always find a different place to live, can always find a way out. Ordinary people cannot. 
That’s why I believe we need to act. Parliament knows full well I respect the fact that you found a compromise on the dedicated ETS system. I don’t agree with that compromise, as you know. And we will see what happens in the trilogue. But my fundamental point here is: look, try and create as much transparency as you can where the cost will fall.
Of course there is a cost involved in introducing a price on carbon, but if you combine that with a climate social fund that will mitigate those costs for those most vulnerable or those who are hit most by this, then I think this is justified. If you put the cost elsewhere, which is what the compromise upon does, then you have to also be honest that cost sooner or later will also end with the same people. And then you need to ask yourselves: is then the climate social fund big enough to then really mitigate those costs? But we’ll get there, I guess, in the trilogues when we revisit the issue.
Now, another element which for me is extremely important, which was raised by many – a bit less here, a bit less there. As far as European industry is concerned, they want one thing and that’s clarity: clarity, predictability and reliability. So let’s not fudge things. Let’s not introduce the idea that there could be also in the future fuels that would be clean. No: for cars and vans that’s nonsense.
The car industry has made its choice. Don’t confuse them. If they’re already on board for electric mobility for cars and vans, don’t make it more difficult for them. And don’t postpone 2035, many car-makers are even on a sooner trajectory. 2035 isn’t science fiction. Some would even argue it’s not ambitious enough. But I think this is where we could all land. And those car manufacturers that might have difficulty because they make smaller cars are in a different position, they can profit from support from the Just Transition Fund to make these things happen more quickly.
But don’t create a fudge with a so-called 90% or with these fuels that are way too expensive to ever form a solution for cars and vans. And, by the way, we will need them in aviation, but that’s a different discussion altogether.
All in all, Mr President, I think we live in the most transformational time, arguably, that humanity has ever experienced. One could say that the first Industrial Revolution was also transformative. True, but it took a long time and it didn’t happen everywhere at the same time. This Industrial Revolution, combined with the climate crisis, is the biggest challenge humanity has ever faced. And the bad news is we are coming late to this challenge.
The good news is we can still fix it if we act now. If you vote tomorrow to let us fix it, and the rest of the world is already following us. Yes, we are only responsible for 8% of global emissions, but the Chinese are copying our ETS systems. The Americans are very interested in what we’re doing on CBAM and looking whether they could have the same systems. 
The circular economy that we’re creating is copied everywhere in the world. And, like it was with the internal market, like it was with environmental legislation, like was every time we took a step higher on the levels of our protection, parts of industry would say, ‘this is the end of industry, this is the end of employment, so many million jobs will disappear’.
The reality is, every time Europe ups the ante our economy grows, our employment grows, and the rest of the world follows our lead. Let it be the same here again."};"The speaker mentions electric vehicles (EVs) in the following points:

1. The speaker emphasizes that European industry wants clarity, predictability, and reliability regarding climate policies. They argue that introducing the idea of clean fuels for cars and vans is ""nonsense"" and would confuse car manufacturers who have already committed to electric mobility.
2. The speaker notes that many car manufacturers are already on board with electric mobility for cars and vans and do not want to be confused or delayed by alternative fuel options.
3. They mention that some car manufacturers might struggle due to making smaller cars, but these companies can benefit from support from the Just Transition Fund to transition to electric vehicles more quickly.
4. The speaker emphasizes that 2035 is a realistic target for transitioning to electric vehicles and notes that some car manufacturers are even aiming for an earlier timeline.

Overall, the speaker's message is that European industry needs clarity on climate policies, particularly regarding electric vehicles, in order to move forward with confidence and achieve ambitious targets like 2035."};0;1;1;1;0;1;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;1;0;0;0;
"2022-06-07_2-136";"Anna-Michelle Asimakopoulou";"EPP";"in writing. – Since 2008, Europe has lost nearly a third of its primary aluminium production capacity, at a time when global demand has surged. The CBAM is proposed to solve this, a way to end so-called Carbon Leakage. Yet, as we approach tomorrow’s vote, we find a solution that is liable to cause more problems than it solves. The CBAM is a creative idea with strong potential, but it’s untested and it’s results far from guaranteed. We must therefore proceed carefully. Overly ambitious timetables, ignoring the warnings about its effects on exports, and looking to broaden the scope at this early stage, risks a host of unintended consequences.
Aluminium is a vital industry for Europe. In Greece, it contributes to nearly 5% of exports, and is a key foundation for wider value chains. Infinitely recyclable, and fundamental to the electric vehicle revolution, aluminium lies at the heart of the green transition. We need aluminium, and we need to produce it here in Europe. Amendments from my group, the EPP, seek to deliver the necessary balance and caution we need to see. We cannot afford to deliver a botched CBAM. The future of European industries like aluminium is in its hands."};"According to the speech, aluminum is ""fundamental to the electric vehicle revolution"". This means that aluminum plays a crucial role in the development and production of electric vehicles. The speaker does not provide further details about how aluminum contributes to the electric vehicle revolution, but it implies that aluminum is an essential material for the industry."};0;0;1;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2022-06-07_7-2";"Frans Timmermans";"NA";" Executive Vice-President of the Commission. – Mr President, I shan’t repeat what I have already said this morning, but the one thing I need to say again is that we need all these proposals if we stick to a legal obligation to be climate neutral by 2050. That’s why this package needs to be complete, consistent and especially socially fair. 
This includes stronger CO2 standards for cars, to reach climate neutrality by 2050, nearly all cars on Europe’s roads need to be zero-emission by then. If you look at the average lifetime of cars, 2035 is a good date for when all new car sales must be zero-emission. It is consistent, especially if this Parliament wants to dress down emissions trading for fuels and road transport, it must deliver car standards that bring affordable zero-emission mobility to citizens. 
Our proposal is technology-neutral and setting targets for all. What it doesn’t do is moving goalposts in mid-race so that winning technologies are handicapped and change doesn’t happen. Of course, many get worked up over this, so I just want to specifically address those issues that have been brought up also this morning, where there are doubts. 
Those who expressed doubts always use the argument of realism, pragmatism to get us to change what we have proposed. So let me also look at this from an angle of realism and pragmatism. Most carmakers have already embraced 2035. Almost all of them. Many want to go further and only sell electric cars by 2030 or even 2028. Our proposal would cement this trend for all carmakers with extra ambition in preceding years. We must give industry a clear signal and allow them to plan investments going forward. That’s what we are asking. Be consistent, be clear, and stick to the plan. And, by the way, I’m deeply convinced that if we don’t lead on this, the Chinese and the Americans will, and they’re moving extremely fast in this area. No place on earth are more electric cars sold than in China these days. So, you know, we need to keep up. 
We have so much to offer. Our car industry is the best in the world by a large margin, but it needs to be zero-emissions. Our consumers want this as well. Whatever study you look at and whether you include car production or not, electric cars are the affordable and sustainable solution. Consumer organisations want these cars. Our impact analysis backs them up. Electric cars are now already cheaper to run because of the fuel savings, especially for low-income households. With revised CO2 performance standards, they will also become cheaper to buy. So in that sense, getting to cheaper electric cars as soon as possible is the right thing to do for people who can’t afford very expensive mobility. 
Of course, zero emission mobility should be a comfortable choice. That’s why we’ve made ambitious proposals to give governments matching responsibility to deliver the charging infrastructure that carmakers and drivers need. Every carmaker I speak to says this ‘we can do this, if you deliver the charging infrastructure, some will be delivered commercially without problems, but in certain areas you will have to pitch in’. And I think that’s just fair and we need to do that. 
Still, we see voices in Parliament that don’t share our sense of urgency. They push, for example, for e-fuels in combustion engines. I want to say a few words about that. These fuels will never, ever be available in sufficient quantities. They will be more expensive at the petrol pump, far more expensive than driving an electric car. They will take six times the energy to produce compared to the battery in a car. Even then, engines would still pollute the air that our citizens breathe. 
I’m deeply aware of the impact on jobs in components and fuels for combustion engines, but the answer isn’t to push solutions that are inconsistent with industry plans, inconsistent with consumers choices, inconsistent with REPowerEU goals to make the best use of energy and with the simple desire of citizens to breathe clean air. 
The answer is to make the transition responsibly also for workers in the supply chain. Jobs will arise in electrification, software, chargers, batteries and even heat pumps with technology now used for car engines, but this won’t allow workers to transition magically. It is not something that just happens. That’s why we need a firm transition plan, a helping hand and funding so that whosever job is on the line can find a job elsewhere. We need everyone in Europe to fill the jobs that will be coming, but they then also have to have the qualifications to be able to do the jobs. 
Jan Huitema’s report makes proposals for this. Next year, the Commission would need to follow up. We could even offer pilots to test strong solutions in real time, especially in those countries where the car industry is extra challenged to make the transition because the consumers in those countries have to catch up and also the infrastructure in those countries has to catch up. Why not make that pilot projects and show that can also happen in countries that perhaps today many people don’t believe it can – because it can. 
Turning briefly to LULUCF and effort-sharing, I am pleased that this Parliament is confirming the key architecture of our proposals. That’s a good basis for trilogues. I want to say one thing on LULUCF. This Parliament rightly puts more emphasis on carbon farming and the carbon removals that this generates, for example, by improving soil and re-wetting lands. The report adds new targets for wetlands and grasslands as carbon sinks. That’s a massive opportunity for farmers to be part of the solution to the climate and biodiversity crises. Farmers suffer more than anybody else from these crises. By making farming sustainable, including via carbon farming, we’re not destroying farming, we’re saving farming. We need to work on this together. 
And I forgot, I think, this morning at the end of my contribution to answer a question by Mr Liese, and I want to do it now. We haven’t supported nuclear from innovation modernisation funds, and I can’t see how we could change this because of the cost involved and the state involvement in nuclear. Our priorities are fully on future renewable solutions such as green, steel and hydrogen, and the limited means we have in the innovation and modernisation funds should be directed there and nowhere else. "};"The speech mentions electric vehicles several times, highlighting their importance for achieving climate neutrality by 2050. Here's a summary of what is said:

* The speaker emphasizes that nearly all cars on Europe's roads need to be zero-emission by 2050, and suggests that the average lifetime of cars means that all new car sales should be zero-emission by 2035.
* Many car manufacturers have already committed to selling only electric cars by 2030 or even 2028, and the proposal aims to cement this trend for all carmakers with extra ambition in preceding years.
* Electric cars are described as an affordable and sustainable solution, with consumers wanting them. The speaker notes that electric cars are now cheaper to run due to fuel savings, especially for low-income households, and will also become cheaper to buy with revised CO2 performance standards.
* The proposal aims to give governments matching responsibility to deliver the charging infrastructure needed for electric cars, as carmakers require this to make the transition to zero-emission mobility.
* The speaker criticizes proposals to use e-fuels in combustion engines, arguing that these fuels will never be available in sufficient quantities, will be more expensive than driving an electric car, and will still pollute the air.

Overall, the speech emphasizes the importance of electric vehicles for achieving climate neutrality and reducing emissions from transportation."};0;0;1;1;1;1;0;1;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2022-06-07_7-7";"Jan Huitema";"NA";"
    Rapporteur. - Mr. President, esteemed Commissioner, dear colleagues, many people are worried about the climate and I am too. I am also seriously concerned about it. I stand behind the Paris Agreement and I have also voted for the Green Deal to be climate neutral by 2050. In addition, as the European Union, we must be less dependent on energy imports. What the war in Ukraine now shows is that we cannot provide ourselves with energy and that we are dependent on countries like Russia. This must end.
    
    We must therefore invest in renewable and sustainable energy such as wind and solar energy and hydropower, but also for example biogas from farm manure, and nuclear energy. We must promote innovation to ensure that companies produce more sustainably with less CO2 emissions. The European trade system for CO2 permits is a good system. It is a market-based system that has proven that it works. There is only one leak. Companies are still being confronted with the import of products that are not so clean, that are not so sustainable, but which are sold cheaply on our market. This leak must be closed. And that is why I am a strong supporter of a new system, the carbon border adjustment mechanism, to close this gap. But not only for imports. It is also important that our companies are protected by exporting to countries outside the European Union in the same way. And that is currently missing in the proposal. I would therefore like to see the European Parliament and the European Commission look at it.
    
    Climate measures cost money. And we have already set up various funds to carry out this transition properly. We have various funds, and now there is talk again of a new fund. I understand that. But please first look at the existing funds and do not set up a new fund with a completely different system than the existing one. It is also important that we invest in real CO2 reductions and not for example in direct income.
    
    And then to cars. I am the chief negotiator and rapporteur for the CO2 standards for cars on behalf of the European Parliament. And what I have found very important from the beginning is that we do not make driving a car at home impossible for people. But if we do not intervene, driving will become enormously expensive. Just look at what the fuel prices are doing at the moment. In addition, there are disincentive measures taken - for example through taxes - to make driving less attractive. We can only do this if there is also an alternative for people to drive cleanly. I stand for that. I want there to be an opportunity with innovations for people to continue to drive cars and at the same time do something about the climate.
    
    This proposal will significantly reduce the 20% of European CO2 emissions caused by road transport. The CO2 emissions of the transport sector are still growing. If we want to make the transport sector climate neutral in 2050, we must take action now. And since the average life of a car is fifteen years, we must do this in 2035. We will not only do this to do something about climate change, but if we invest in clean and emission-free cars, it is also positive for air quality in cities and on the countryside. In addition, it reduces our dependence on fossil fuels. We want to get rid of them as quickly as possible. This is a very important instrument to ensure that we are less dependent on fossil fuels and the import of energy. 
    In addition, but by no means least, which is very important to me, is that driving will remain affordable. At the moment, driving an electric car compared to a combustion engine on diesel and gasoline in many countries is already cheaper. The maintenance of emission-free cars is also much cheaper. The big problem at the moment is the high purchase costs of such clean cars, for example electric cars. In recent times, however, these acquisition costs have fallen enormously and in some countries, the total costs of driving with a battery car are already lower than driving with an internal combustion engine, and this will only become more favorable in the future.
    
    What I want to do with this proposal is to create clarity for both industry and people at home that our focus is on developing clean cars and that there is also investment security for this, that we will stimulate innovation and that companies no longer have to bet on different horses, but that this is the way out, that we can offer a cheaper alternative.
    
    With a large majority in the European Parliament, it has been decided that we want to fight against climate change. In my opinion, there is a large majority here as well, among colleagues. But then we must also be able to stand for continuing these measures. Tomorrow is a very important day and I therefore call on you to take responsibility tomorrow and also stand by the promise to do something about climate change."};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned related to electric vehicles:

1. The speaker mentions that driving an electric car compared to a combustion engine on diesel and gasoline is already cheaper in many countries.
2. The maintenance of emission-free cars (including electric cars) is much cheaper than traditional internal combustion engines.
3. Although the purchase costs of electric cars are still high, these acquisition costs have fallen enormously in recent times, making them more competitive with traditional cars.
4. In some countries, the total costs of driving a battery car are already lower than driving a car with an internal combustion engine, and this will only become more favorable in the future.
5. The speaker wants to create clarity for both industry and people at home that the focus is on developing clean cars (including electric vehicles) and that there is investment security for this.

Overall, the speech highlights the benefits of electric vehicles, including their lower operating costs and potential for cost savings compared to traditional internal combustion engines."};0;0;0;1;0;1;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2022-06-07_7-15";"Jens Gieseke";"EPP";"
    On behalf of the PPE Group. – Dear Mr. President, dear Vice-President Timmermans, dear colleagues! Does the automotive industry in Europe still have a future? We decide today whether it is no longer or not less.
    Many of you now think of the large automobile corporations, but forget the many small and medium-sized companies, especially in the supplier industry. Unfortunately, half a million people will lose their jobs. And who is responsible for this social clear-cut? Social Democrats, Greens, and some Liberals in this house want to ban combustion engines out of ideological reasons.
    It is clear that this is tangible and can be marketed as a headline, but the reality looks different: emissions are only shifted from road traffic to energy production - no matter. The rigid focus on electric cars brings us new dependencies, for example, on China - no matter. And hundreds of thousands of jobs are at stake - no matter.
    As EVP, we cannot go this way together. Therefore, we have submitted amendments that combine climate protection and technological openness. This means concretely, and I ask you to listen carefully: almost complete electrification of new cars from 2035, but also a door for other CO2-neutral technologies. We need ambitious reduction targets and flexibility for the market and customers. In short, we need no bans.
    Therefore, I ask you: Support our amendments - a reduction target of 90% and a voluntary crediting system for synthetic fuels. I believe that we then combine climate protection and realism in politics as Vice-President Timmermans has just pointed out."};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned related to electric vehicles:

1. The speaker criticizes the idea of banning combustion engines, which they believe will lead to emissions being shifted from road traffic to energy production.
2. They mention that a focus on electric cars brings new dependencies, specifically on China.
3. The speaker suggests almost complete electrification of new cars by 2035 as part of their proposed amendments.

Overall, the speech presents a nuanced view of electric vehicles, acknowledging their potential role in reducing emissions but also expressing concerns about the unintended consequences of relying too heavily on them."};0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;1;0;0;0;0;
"2022-06-07_7-17";"Pascal Canfin";"Renew";"
    In the name of Renew Group. - Mr. President, Mr. Vice-President of the Commission, Madam Minister - dear Chrysoula -, we are all linked in this hemicycle by the European climate law. We voted for it. What does this law say? It says that we must be carbon neutral by 2050. To be carbon neutral by 2050, we need to stop selling cars that are not zero-emission fifteen years before. Why fifteen years before? Because a car on average runs for fifteen years on European roads.
    So, if we do not put an end to the sale of cars that are not zero CO2 emission by 2035, it means that we cannot comply with the Paris Agreement, that we cannot comply with the European climate law. And if we don't do it for cars, tomorrow, next year, when it will be needed for trucks, it will be the same debate and we will fail. So we will have given up doing it for the main CO2 emitting sector. This means that we will have de facto given up climate neutrality, the Paris Agreement, and compliance with the European climate law. That's what is at stake today, and we cannot compromise on this requirement.
    Therefore, we must vote for 100% zero-emission by 2035. But of course, we must also accompany the social issues. There are many employees who will find jobs in electric batteries. We are creating gigafactories all over Europe to build electric batteries. We were not building any electric battery three years ago, and in a few years, we will be the second-largest producers of electric batteries in the world. This is zero carbon innovation, and I am surprised that the right is still in a logic completely turned towards the past.
    But we will also accompany the losers. We must not hide our faces: when we go from situation A to situation B, there are winners and there are losers. That's why this Parliament will vote on the Just Transition Fund for the employees of the automotive industry as we have voted for the Just Transition Fund for the workers concerned, especially in Eastern Europe, by the energy transition. This is balance, ambition climate, industrial ambition, social justice. That's why we must vote 100% for zero-emission vehicles by 2035."};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned related to electric vehicles:

1. The European climate law requires that all cars sold must be zero-emission by 2035.
2. This is necessary because a car on average runs for 15 years on European roads, and if we don't stop selling non-zero-emission cars by 2035, it will be impossible to comply with the Paris Agreement and the European climate law.
3. The production of electric batteries is increasing in Europe, with gigafactories being built all over the continent.
4. In a few years, Europe will become the second-largest producer of electric batteries in the world.
5. Electric vehicles are considered ""zero-carbon innovation"".
6. The Just Transition Fund will be voted on to support employees who lose their jobs due to the transition from non-zero-emission cars to zero-emission cars.

Overall, the speech emphasizes the importance of transitioning to zero-emission vehicles by 2035 and highlights the opportunities and challenges that come with this transition."};0;1;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;
"2022-06-07_7-18";"Ciarán Cuffe";"Greens/EFA";"on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group. – Mr President, the journey of a thousand miles begins with that first step. And today we take that step in moving towards a greener future for travel, with cleaner air, improved mobility and quality jobs. To do so, we must back a full phase-out of the internal combustion engine by 2035, with intermediate targets for 2027 and 2030. It is shameful that we didn’t secure a 2030 phase-out date. The influence of the car lobby on this law is obvious. 
A full and faster phase-out by 2035 is needed to keep the dream of 1.5 degrees alive. And of course, greener cars are no silver bullet for the climate challenges. We must invest in walking, in safe cycling, in micro-mobility and in quality and affordable buses and trains. And as Commissioner Timmermans said, electric cars are already cheaper to run and soon they will be cheaper to buy. So the time is now. We must seize this opportunity. "};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned related to electric vehicles:

1. Electric cars are already cheaper to run.
2. Soon, they will be cheaper to buy.

These two statements suggest that electric vehicles have an economic advantage over traditional internal combustion engine vehicles, and this advantage is expected to increase in the future."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2022-06-07_7-22";"Mario Furore";"NI";" – Mr. President, esteemed colleagues, Mr. Commissioner, the electric car is the future, gasoline and diesel cars are the past. In a few years, most citizens will have a charging point under their homes, while the internal combustion engine will only be a memory in an old yellow photograph.
    This is good for our planet and future generations, as well as for our wallets, because we can fill up thanks to solar panels installed on the roofs of houses.
    This is also good for our Europe, which will no longer be dependent on oil-producing countries and can rely on its own energy resources, such as the sun, wind, and all renewable energies that are infinite and clean.
    We must be visionaries, like the Five Star Movement since its inception, and strongly say yes to stopping the sale of gasoline and diesel cars starting from 2035. At the same time, we have a huge responsibility that we cannot betray towards all those small and medium-sized automotive and road transport companies, especially in Italy, which employ thousands of people.
    We must not leave anyone behind. That's why we need a European fund as soon as possible that can mitigate the potential employment impact of this transition to sustainable mobility. This is the right path to follow: more electric cars, more bike paths, more efficient public transport, fewer harmful emissions, and fewer deaths from smog. Finally, today we can say: welcome Europe in the future!"};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned related to electric vehicles:

1. The speaker believes that electric cars are the ""future"" and gasoline and diesel cars are the ""past"".
2. It is predicted that most citizens will have a charging point under their homes in a few years.
3. Electric vehicles can be filled up using solar panels installed on house roofs, making them more convenient and cost-effective.
4. The transition to electric vehicles will reduce dependence on oil-producing countries and allow Europe to rely on its own renewable energy resources such as the sun, wind, and other clean energies.
5. The speaker advocates for stopping the sale of gasoline and diesel cars starting from 2035.

Overall, the speech emphasizes the benefits of electric vehicles in terms of environmental sustainability, economic efficiency, and independence from foreign oil supplies."};0;0;1;0;0;1;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2022-06-07_7-23";"Pascal Arimont";"EPP";"
    Dear Mr. President, esteemed representatives of the Council, dear Vice-President Timmermans! It is important and right that we now make the right decisions to shape our mobility climate neutral. Therefore, the European Commission proposes that only new vehicles be allowed from 2035 onwards, which are powered by a battery. So far, so good. But there are still many open questions that cannot be answered seriously or completely.
    
    Firstly: How climate-neutral is an electric car actually?
    Secondly: How can we produce enough electricity from renewable energy by 2035 to make the use of electric batteries really climate-neutral? Or do we have to import extremely large amounts of energy in the form of hydrogen or synthetic climate-neutral fuel anyway?
    Thirdly: Will we have built the necessary charging infrastructure, especially in rural areas and Eastern Europe, by 2035?
    Fourthly: Are we not falling into a very dangerous dependence on nickel, cobalt, or lithium, i.e., a renewed dependence on raw materials?
    Fifthly: Will people with an average and low income be able to afford an electric car in the future?
    All these questions are still not satisfactorily answered. Therefore, I consider it bold to commit everything to one horse - the electric motor - at this point.
    
    No, I am not against e-mobility. I plead for more flexibility and above all for an open competition of technologies. Because technological openness has always been a trump card and is also a chance here. I do not want technology from combustion engines to disappear in Europe, including engineers and hundreds of thousands of jobs, while China produces e-fuel and has a significant influence on the access to raw materials we need for electric cars.
    
    It would be despicable if consumers in 2035 had to choose between a clearly cheaper electric car than today and a hybrid with imported e-fuel. Both should be possible. Now, however, we should not put all our eggs in the basket of a few countries like China. Climate-neutral, yes, but not with shortcuts."};"The speaker discusses the European Commission's proposal to make only new vehicles powered by batteries from 2035 onwards. They raise several concerns and questions related to electric vehicles (EVs):

1. **Climate neutrality**: The speaker asks how climate-neutral an EV actually is, implying that there may be doubts about its environmental impact.
2. **Renewable energy production**: They question whether enough electricity will be produced from renewable sources by 2035 to make the use of EV batteries truly climate-neutral, or if large amounts of energy will need to be imported in other forms (e.g., hydrogen or synthetic fuel).
3. **Charging infrastructure**: The speaker wonders if the necessary charging infrastructure will be built, especially in rural areas and Eastern Europe, by 2035.
4. **Raw materials dependence**: They express concerns about the potential dependence on raw materials like nickel, cobalt, and lithium for EV production.
5. **Affordability**: The speaker questions whether people with average and low incomes will be able to afford EVs in the future.

The speaker also emphasizes the importance of flexibility and open competition among technologies, suggesting that relying solely on electric motors might not be the best approach. They argue that Europe should not abandon combustion engine technology and its associated jobs while China develops e-fuel and dominates access to raw materials needed for EV production."};0;0;0;0;1;0;1;1;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;1;0;
"2022-06-07_7-27";"Aurélia Beigneux";"ID";"
    Mr. President, Mr. rapporteur, one last proof of your total disconnection from reality and radical ethnocentrism: you bring it here with these violent standards, which squeeze the motorist, our industries, and therefore the entire European economy by ricochet.
    With you, the European Union has become the union of the big metropolises, and nothing else. Your voters, half of whom depend on the internal combustion engine daily, thank you for these new restrictions, which make their journeys from home to work more expensive and longer without, however, providing a reliable solution.
    Our industries have made the greatest sacrifices to please the European diktats. But, for the Parliament, and especially for you, Mr. rapporteur, nothing is enough. Ambitiousness is not enough for you. You no longer hide your goal: to eliminate all internal combustion engines within unrealistic deadlines and impose electric cars for everyone, whatever the price.
    So, it's easy for you, who only know planes, taxis, trains... But it's difficult for the daily workers. The climate emergency obviously imposes new ambitious decisions, but why do Europeans, and especially the most modest, always have to bear this burden?
    Go live in the provinces with liberal nurses, craftsmen or salespeople. The world does not only consist of Brussels or Strasbourg. You know perfectly well that, to produce electric batteries, rare metals must be extracted from Chinese, Congolese or Bolivian mines, under disastrous environmental and human conditions. Never the text mentions the thousands of peasants forcibly displaced after seeing their polluted exploitation by fine dust. It's shameful! The text never talks about the overconsumption of water linked to extraction. Your policy is completely hypocritical.
    The conclusion is therefore clear: the European Union, which gives lessons in humanism to the whole earth, wants to shift pollution from our big cities to the Third World. In France, these new standards have given rise to the yellow vests uprising, barely two fingers away from toppling the Macron government. Your decisions will have consequences. It's time for you to finally act in the interest of your own voters."};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned related to electric vehicles:

1. The rapporteur (presumably a member of the European Parliament) aims to eliminate all internal combustion engines within unrealistic deadlines.
2. Electric cars will be imposed on everyone, regardless of the price.
3. To produce electric batteries, rare metals must be extracted from mines in China, Congo, or Bolivia, which has disastrous environmental and human conditions.

The speaker criticizes this policy as hypocritical, arguing that it shifts pollution from European cities to the Third World, and that it will have consequences for voters."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;
"2022-06-07_7-30";"Massimiliano Salini";"EPP";" – Mr. President, esteemed colleagues, we are discussing the way to build a social model, a more sustainable economic life.
    If we were to move this discussion out of the European Parliament and wanted to place it on a global level, we could bring the European model as a model to follow, the most sustainable model in the world.
    Instead, today we have heard reminders that we should follow Chinese leadership in transitioning from internal combustion engine vehicles to electric vehicles. And the person who proposed this has forgotten to mention how electricity is produced in China, in the most unsustainable way known.
    So, before suggesting such risky models, we must look more carefully at what has happened over the decades on our continent, to build innovative and sustainable models. But do not only consider the large automobile manufacturers as interlocutors, let's also consider the entire supply chain, all small producers, who make the brake, who make the chassis, who make the gearbox, because we, elected by the people, know that to listen to interlocutors you have to listen to them all, not only those with a loud voice. Vice President. Everyone must be listened to, so that the transition is not a model proposed from above, as it is done in China, but a process that arises from below, as has always been done in Europe."};"According to the speech, someone suggested that the European Union should follow China's leadership in transitioning from internal combustion engine vehicles to electric vehicles. However, this suggestion was criticized by the speaker because it ignores how electricity is produced in China, which is done in an unsustainable way.

In other words, the speaker is saying that while electric vehicles themselves may be a sustainable option, the production of electricity in China is not, and therefore, following China's model would not necessarily lead to a more sustainable outcome. The speaker emphasizes the importance of considering the entire supply chain and all stakeholders involved in the transition to electric vehicles, rather than just relying on large automobile manufacturers or top-down decisions made by governments."};0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;
"2022-06-07_7-34";"Matteo Adinolfi";"ID";" – Mr. President, esteemed colleagues, while remaining firmly committed to the need to decarbonize road transport and the importance of steering the market in that direction, it is appropriate to emphasize that zero-emission mobility requires significant investments from vehicle manufacturers and the automotive components sector, which includes many small and medium-sized enterprises. This also involves the rapid development in Europe of a sustainable battery supply chain and an electric vehicle market, new and second-hand, at affordable prices.
    It should be noted that an exclusively electric strategy would increase dependence on totalitarian countries such as Russia and China, as demonstrated by the first bottlenecks in the supply of raw materials for batteries.
    We support low-emission mobility, provided it is economically sustainable, and that it provides a credible commitment to reducing pollution without, however, envisaging the definitive end of vehicles with internal combustion engines from 2035. Environmental sustainability and economic sustainability must go hand in hand, otherwise we will find ourselves in a green world full of bankrupt companies and unemployed workers."};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned regarding electric vehicles:

1. The development of an electric vehicle market, both new and second-hand, at affordable prices, is considered important for achieving zero-emission mobility.
2. An exclusively electric strategy would increase dependence on totalitarian countries such as Russia and China, due to bottlenecks in the supply of raw materials for batteries.

Overall, the speech emphasizes the need for a sustainable electric vehicle market that balances environmental sustainability with economic sustainability, without necessarily envisioning an immediate end to vehicles with internal combustion engines."};0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;1;0;
"2022-06-07_7-36";"Kateřina Konečná";"The Left";" – Mr. President, esteemed colleagues, dear ladies and gentlemen, dear Mr. Timmermans, first of all, I would like to ask you to really consider how you will vote tomorrow on the proposal for reducing CO2 emissions from cars. I would like to emphasize that this regulation will have enormous economic and social impacts across the European Union. The automotive industry in the European Union employs millions of people and, for example, in my country it accounts for up to 8% of GDP. In times of pandemic, this sector is not exactly in top shape and faces a range of serious problems. In addition, the unavailability of personal car transportation for the poorest or the fall of this industry could cause major social unrest.
    Before banning the sale of new cars with internal combustion engines, we must first offer people an accessible alternative to personal transportation. I would be very sorry if the revision of that regulation turned out like last time, when member states washed their hands over the development of clean mobility and its infrastructure. For Central and Eastern Europe, these cars are completely economically inaccessible and the charging infrastructure is tragic. It is also necessary for the proposal to be somewhat proportionate. If we are talking about the end of selling cars with internal combustion engines, it must be said that there is no economic sense in accepting any new emissions limits, whether in the form of a new EURO 7 standard or new transitional CO2 limits in the interim period. With the prospect of the imminent end of internal combustion engines, it makes no sense for their manufacturers to invest billions of euros more in their development. These could instead be invested in the development of clean mobility and its availability."};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned related to electric vehicles:

1. The speaker emphasizes that before banning the sale of new cars with internal combustion engines, an accessible alternative to personal transportation must be offered.
2. It is implied that electric vehicles (or ""clean mobility"") could be this alternative, as the speaker mentions investing in their development and availability.
3. However, it is also mentioned that for Central and Eastern Europe, these cars are currently economically inaccessible due to a lack of charging infrastructure.

Overall, the speech suggests that electric vehicles could be a viable alternative to internal combustion engines, but notes that there are still challenges to overcome before they can become a practical option for many people."};0;1;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;
"2022-06-07_7-38";"Mohammed Chahim";"S&D";" – Mr President, Commissioner, Council. We have been discussing the whole day that we need to make sure that the climate law targets will be achieved by the position of Parliament. 
I think that every sector needs to contribute its fair share to the EU climate effort if we want to reach the Paris Climate Agreement and climate law targets, and it’s the same I think for land—use change and the forestry sector. I am very happy that I can pronounce it now.
I do believe that natural—based solutions are a key part of the Fit for 55 package. I think the compromise we have on the table is well—balanced. I think it’s good not to include too much flexibility when it comes to agriculture, because there’s a lot of insecurity when measuring and capturing the CO2 in these natural—based solutions.
Then there is CO2 and cars. The key word here is ‘lobby’, and the lobby machine was working really hard in this House. I never thought that the 2035 phasing—out of the combustion engine would be at risk, because I thought that’s like the minimum we should get. I mean, that’s the position of the Council, and we should always push for more ambition. 
I talked to industry and industry told me ‘well, Mohammed, it is possible, but then we need more alternative fuel infrastructure. That’s what’s lacking now’. Then I’m thinking that’s the exact same lobby that years ago, when the Commission proposed an ambitious alternative fuel infrastructure directive – now we’re talking about a regulation – well they lobbied it so it was decreased ambition. Now they say we cannot go forward due to the lack of infrastructure. There you have it. There’s always an excuse not to go forward.
If you work and if you talk about real jobs, the future of the electric car is the future of the car industry in the EU, including the batteries. That’s what’s at stake tomorrow. I hope we conscientiously decide to vote in favour of the changes, to vote in favour of the climate law. "};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned related to electric vehicles:

1. The speaker mentions that the future of the car industry in the EU is tied to the development of electric cars.
2. They mention that the batteries used in electric cars are also at stake.
3. The speaker expresses hope that the changes being voted on will be in favor of the climate law, implying that this would support the growth and adoption of electric vehicles.

These points suggest that the speaker views electric vehicles as a key part of the future of the car industry in the EU and is advocating for policies that would promote their development."};0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;
"2022-06-07_7-40";"Eleonora Evi";"Greens/EFA";" – Mr. President, esteemed colleagues, in the last legislature I followed the work on the regulation on CO2 standards for cars and I clearly remember the resistance of those who opposed stricter rules due to the alleged inability of the industry to convert in time. Well, we have seen and then confirmed the exact opposite: manufacturers have been offered new market perspectives and the sales of electric vehicles are growing year by year. This shows that what some political parties considered unrealistic is, in reality, not only possible but also advantageous from every point of view.
     Today, an extra push is needed because the climate crisis and air pollution, the air we breathe in our cities, impose to act quickly. I say this especially as an Italian: my country is first in Europe for premature deaths due to atmospheric pollution, almost 60,000 a year.
     Therefore, banning polluting vehicles is not an ecological whim, but a social, health, environmental, climatic and economic urgency. Economic, yes, because electric mobility creates jobs."};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned related to electric vehicles:

1. The sales of electric vehicles are growing year by year.
2. Manufacturers have been offered new market perspectives due to stricter CO2 standards for cars.
3. Electric mobility creates jobs.

In summary, the text highlights the positive impact of electric vehicles on the industry and the economy, as well as their increasing popularity."};0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;
"2022-06-07_7-42";"Jorge Buxadé Villalba";"ECR";"
    Mr. President, Vigo, Zaragoza, Madrid, Valencia, Palencia, Valladolid, Pamplona, Martorell and Barcelona, Orense, Vitoria, Avila, Tona or Jaen are all the cities in Spain where there is an automotive or components industry.
    I am sure that the Spaniards who work there know that none of you have visited them, nor will you. You will not appear there to answer for their lives and jobs if they are fired or replaced prematurely, but with your vote you will decide on their lives and jobs.
    It seems that your goal is to destroy European industry and give the Asian production market a gift. Have you explained to them that producing a vehicle takes more than six years and that you cannot change the rules of the game in the middle of the process? Will you explain to the truck drivers who don't make it to the end of the month that they have to buy a more expensive vehicle with less loading capacity? And where will they recharge the vehicles? Do you know that most Europeans live crammed in buildings and with their cars on the streets?
    I understand that it doesn't matter to you. Down here, we have dozens of electric cars for ourselves, and neither you nor the big companies will suffer, but your fanaticism will lead to the ruin of our families and our businesses."};"The speaker mentions electric vehicles in the following points:

1. The speaker states that they have ""dozens of electric cars for ourselves"", implying that they or someone they know owns or has access to electric vehicles.
2. The speaker questions where truck drivers will recharge their vehicles, suggesting that electric vehicles require recharging and that this is a concern.

These are the only mentions of electric vehicles in the text."};0;1;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;
"2022-06-07_7-55";"Isabella Tovaglieri";"ID";" – Mr. President, esteemed colleagues, in this dramatic moment, it is truly dangerous to sacrifice the European economies on the altar of the ecological utopia of the green turnaround.
    Some of the biggest polluters in Europe, like Germany, which alone is responsible for a quarter of greenhouse gas emissions in the European Union, want to impose unrealistic climate objectives on everyone, such as stopping internal combustion engines, before technologies, infrastructure, and citizens are ready for this epochal turn.
    Producing only electric cars from 2035 does not mean becoming green or sustainable, but means closing companies, creating unemployment, and poverty.
    Europe, which contributes very little to global CO2 emissions, is really willing to go from the slavery of Russian gas to that of lithium batteries from China, and for absurd reasons of principle?
    Brussels is still in time to reconsider this ideological and punitive vision towards itself, which risks turning the most important Western civilization into a dependency of less democratic and more polluting countries in the world."};"According to the speech, producing only electric cars from 2035 would have negative consequences, including:

* Closing companies
* Creating unemployment
* Poverty

The speaker argues that this is not a sustainable or green solution, but rather a misguided attempt to impose unrealistic climate objectives on everyone. They also suggest that Europe would be trading one form of dependence (Russian gas) for another (lithium batteries from China), which they consider absurd and ideologically driven."};0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;
"2022-06-07_7-57";"Angelika Niebler";"EPP";"
    Mr. President, Vice-President of the European Commission, dear colleagues! I am speaking on the subject of CO2 emissions standards for passenger cars and light commercial vehicles. And I have two statements.
    
    Firstly: I believe that electric cars have a bright future. What is crucial for this is the development of charging infrastructure, which must be made available. I am convinced that if this is the case throughout the European Union, electric cars will be a self-runner.
    
    Secondly: I am firmly against banning combustion engines in 2035. I believe that technological neutrality is the order of the day. I see a future also for alternative fuels, synthetic fuels, for hydrogen technology. I think that we as Members of Parliament should not decide which technology prevails on the market, but rather there is still great potential in terms of innovation and scientific development. And we should also not exclude other technologies a priori and we should also be honest and carry out a life cycle assessment and not always just measure CO2 emissions at the exhaust pipe."};"According to the speech, the speaker believes that:

* Electric cars have a bright future.
* The development of charging infrastructure throughout the European Union is crucial for this future.
* If charging infrastructure is made available, electric cars will be self-sufficient.

In summary, the speaker sees electric vehicles as having potential and emphasizes the importance of developing charging infrastructure to support their growth."};0;0;0;0;1;0;0;1;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2022-06-07_7-60";"Sylvia Limmer";"ID";"
    Mr. President, esteemed colleagues! The fairy tale of supposedly emission-free electric cars is propagated unabated. And not only according to the will of the Commission should the combustion engine be history from at least 2035. In the twisted logic of green prosperity destroyers, every electric car - filled with electricity generated from fossil energy sources - is a zero-emission vehicle.
    You ignore not only the emissions during refueling, but also the very considerable CO2 backpack of all traction batteries, which falls due to production or the energy-intensive recycling. And where does this electricity come from? You ignore that every increase in power demand, even with a massive expansion of volatile renewables, must result in an increase in fossil energy sources if there are no storage facilities available.
    You ignore future resource shortages. Alone for the EU car fleet, 19 times the annual global production would be needed just for cobalt. You ignore new, looming geostrategic dependencies, such as from China, on the required components for batteries, as if you had not learned anything from the catastrophic dependence on Russian gas.
    You ignore serious environmental damage in mining and further processing, not to mention social fault lines and child labor in the third countries concerned. You ignore an incredible job destruction associated with it. Alone in Germany, 800,000 jobs depend on combustion engines. According to government figures, 440,000 of these will disappear in green enthusiasm by 2030, just eight years away.
    You ignore all the childhood diseases of electromobility and customer needs - from patchy fire protection to range acceptance. You ignore the lack of charging infrastructure, you ignore warnings from economics, industry, technology, and teaching, and insist instead on a one-sided political definition of electromobility that will not reduce CO2 emissions in the near future because the idea of abolishing individual mobility as not only a historical guarantee of prosperity and freedom but also the abolition of the car as private property has already been considered.
    At least this reality is already being discussed openly in Brussels. To this endeavor, we give a clear rejection. Not with us."};"According to the speech, the following points are made about electric vehicles:

1. Electric cars are not truly emission-free because they are often powered by electricity generated from fossil energy sources.
2. The production of traction batteries for electric cars results in a significant amount of CO2 emissions.
3. Recycling these batteries is also energy-intensive and generates additional CO2 emissions.
4. The increased demand for power to charge electric vehicles will lead to an increase in the use of fossil energy sources, as there are no sufficient storage facilities available.
5. The production of cobalt required for battery production would require 19 times the annual global production just to meet the needs of the EU car fleet, which could lead to resource shortages and geostrategic dependencies on countries like China.
6. Mining and processing of materials for electric vehicles can cause environmental damage, social problems, and child labor in third-world countries.
7. The transition to electric vehicles will result in significant job losses, with 440,000 jobs dependent on combustion engines expected to disappear in Germany by 2030.
8. Electric vehicles have several ""childhood diseases"" including patchy fire protection, range acceptance issues, and a lack of charging infrastructure.

Overall, the speech argues that electric vehicles are not as environmentally friendly or sustainable as they are often portrayed, and that their adoption will come with significant social and economic costs."};0;1;0;0;1;0;1;1;1;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;
"2022-06-07_7-64";"Frédérique Ries";"Renew";"
    Mr. President, Madam President of the Council - dear Chrysoula, what a pleasure! -, Mr. Commissioner - dear Frans-, Europe has this unique opportunity and chance to become the leading global actor in taking concrete action for a decarbonized economy by 2050. And this passes through a clear vote tomorrow, an unambiguous vote for the end of internal combustion engines for new vehicles as of 2035.
    Technologically, it is doable. We invest 61 billion euros each year in automotive development and research. From an economic and social point of view, there are still questions to ensure that every European household will have the opportunity to buy this electric car. Only 13% of new purchases last year, we are far from the goal. So here, the priority is to convince with a targeted battery of benefits, purchase premiums, secondary market incentives, VAT reductions, free parking, I don't know, we can ask the Norwegians, they have succeeded in this area.
    The other front in the war. Of course, it's about batteries. We manage to make them. It remains the charging stations. In short, the challenge is huge. So to conclude with Birgitte Nyborg from Borgen, what are our options? I would say that here, the answer is easy. We have only the choice of ambition. Unless we betray, betray our children and deny all our commitments."};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned related to electric vehicles:

1. The goal is to end internal combustion engines for new vehicles as of 2035.
2. Currently, only 13% of new vehicle purchases last year were electric cars, which means there is still a long way to go to reach the goal.
3. To encourage more people to buy electric cars, targeted benefits such as:
	* Purchase premiums
	* Secondary market incentives
	* VAT reductions
	* Free parking (and possibly other incentives, as mentioned in the text)
4. The speaker suggests looking at Norway's success in promoting electric vehicles for inspiration.
5. The challenge is huge and requires a lot of effort to make it happen.

Overall, the speech emphasizes the importance of taking concrete action towards a decarbonized economy by 2050, with a focus on promoting electric vehicles as one of the key solutions."};0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;1;0;
"2022-06-07_7-65";"Teuvo Hakkarainen";"ID";" – Dear Mr. Speaker, the greenhouse effect has been raised to divine dimensions. It has become a religion. It is an illness of vanity where facts no longer have any significance. The carbon dioxide lobby predicts the end of the world. That's what it's always been about. It hasn't just happened to us.
    – According to the delusion, forest fires and floods - which have always occurred - are also caused by climate change. The EU has fallen into its own madness. Finland is planning to turn Europe into a timber reserve, putting forests under the control of the European Union. Socialism is not dead.
    – Motorway traffic is being attacked in an unprecedented way. In practice, this means completely ending the use of petrol and diesel cars. Electric cars are expected to be saviors, but the technology needs to be developed a lot for that to happen. An electric car produces emissions during its lifetime at least as much as a petrol or diesel car. I'm sure that in the electric car era, the most outrageous fantasies will have to be abandoned. When these greenhouse gas tonnes are constantly talked about, where is the yardstick by which they are measured?"};"According to the speech, electric cars are expected to be saviors, but the technology needs to be developed further for that to happen. Additionally, it is mentioned that an electric car produces emissions during its lifetime at least as much as a petrol or diesel car. This implies that the speaker is skeptical about the environmental benefits of electric vehicles and believes that they may not be as effective in reducing emissions as claimed."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2022-06-07_7-68";"Andreas Glück";"Renew";"
    Mr. President, esteemed colleagues! A clear yes to climate neutrality by 2050. But prescribing certain technologies or prohibiting others is the wrong way.
    We need technological openness. Let us use the innovation potential that exists in Europe. And measuring CO2 emissions in an exhaust pipe alone is not enough, it's too short-sighted. We need a life cycle assessment, we need a well-to-wheel approach. Battery electric vehicles are not a problem. But just because a battery electric vehicle has no exhaust pipe, it doesn't mean that it has no CO2 emissions. The emissions just occur elsewhere. And an internal combustion engine can be climate neutral if it is operated with synthetic fuels.
    If we only allow battery electric vehicles from 2035 onwards, then we are becoming dependent. The required resources come to over 80% from companies controlled by China. From one dependence to another dependence: Haven't we learned anything from this crisis?
    And if it happens, as some claim, that synthetic fuels will be too expensive in the future, then there is no need to ban combustion engines. They simply won't happen or only where they are needed.
    Without putting all our eggs in one basket, I simply consider this wrong."};"According to the speech, battery electric vehicles (BEVs) are not a problem, but they do have CO2 emissions, just elsewhere in their life cycle. The speaker argues that relying solely on BEVs from 2035 onwards would make Europe dependent on resources controlled by Chinese companies, which is undesirable.

In summary, the text mentions:

* Battery electric vehicles (BEVs) have CO2 emissions, although not through exhaust pipes.
* Relying only on BEVs could lead to dependence on Chinese-controlled resources.
* The speaker does not consider BEVs a problem in themselves."};0;0;1;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;
"2022-06-07_7-69";"Alexandr Vondra";"ECR";" – Mr. Chairman, Mr. Jan Huitema's report on cars is poor and must be changed at least in two aspects, otherwise we are against it. Firstly, tightening the targets even more for the years 2025-2027 is absurd. It will force people to buy electric cars that will be expensive and will have a carbon footprint in the neighboring coal-fired power plant. Less emissions? Not by chance. And secondly, a total ban on internal combustion engines in 2035 is a gross mistake. It contradicts technological neutrality, suppresses competition on the market, creates a monopoly, brings costs, and will eliminate tens of thousands of jobs without replacement. And we give a bonus to China and Asia, which has an advantage in software and batteries that this continent will not be able to catch up with."};"According to the speech, it is mentioned that tightening targets for electric cars (2025-2027) would force people to buy expensive electric cars that would have a carbon footprint due to being powered by coal-fired power plants. This implies that the speaker is skeptical about the environmental benefits of electric vehicles in this scenario.

In summary, the text suggests that:

* Electric cars would be expensive
* They would still have a significant carbon footprint due to being powered by coal-fired power plants
* The targets for electric car adoption are too ambitious and unrealistic

Note that the speech does not provide any positive or neutral comments about electric vehicles."};0;1;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;1;0;0;0;0;
"2022-06-07_7-80";"Frans Timmermans";"NA";" Executive Vice-President of the Commission. – Mr President, I would like to use the time allotted to me to talk about an issue that I feel very passionately about. To start with a confession, I am a petrol head. I love cars, I’ve always loved cars, I’ve been repairing and restoring cars since my teenage years. And I still remember every car my dad ever owned and I could even draw it for you. That’s how I was raised.
And until today, I still love cars and I love my motorbike. But I also know this love needs to change. I need to go from being a petrol head to becoming a battery head. And I can also say that the fun will not diminish, because the electric cars we see are fun to drive, they’re exciting to drive, they’re also clean, their technology is exciting to follow and Europe has finally stepped up to the plate.
And Europe is now more and more capable to build cars that can compete with the American cars, with the Asian cars, even though Europe was very late coming to the party. And that is something we can reproach our car industry. Bit too much hubris, believing that we would make ever more efficient combustion-engine cars and that would save the day, and now we understand the world has moved on.
And I don’t think that by prolonging the change to electric mobility, by leaving a loophole in the legislation so that not a complete ban on emission cars by 2035, but leaving there an opportunity to still build them is not helping the car industry at all. And it certainly is not helping the consumers.
If you want our car industry to move faster, to produce affordable electric cars for everyone, you have to make sure they will concentrate everything they do on that. If you want, because then they say: ‘well, it’s not just about the car manufacturers, it’s about this whole ecosystem of suppliers that are part of that’. How are you going to help a supplier who supplies elements for combustion engines? By forcing them to continue to supply those elements in ever decreasing quantities, because that will be the reality.
So what you will see, if you choose the so—called 90% option, you will slow down the decrease of prices and the technological development of electric cars. And you will force manufacturers to continue to produce ever-decreasing numbers of combustion engines that will become ever more expensive. That’s an economic logic. It’s a matter of scale.
So who are you doing a favour here? No one. And just slowing down technological development is a bad choice. We see it in every industrial revolution. The longer you take to make a change that is inevitable, the more it will cost. It will cost them more money, it will cost more social pain, it will create an illusion. And you chain people to a past that has no future. This is not helping the European car industry at all.
And I’m not even speaking about the absolute, absolute certainty that the fuel you think could power these clean combustion engine cars is so much more expensive per kilometre driven than electricity. Not just a bit more expensive. No, three, four, five, six times more expensive. If you at least also incorporate in your analysis our plans on rooftop solar, our plans on offshore wind, our plans on creating much, much more opportunity for renewable energy.
So don’t deprive European citizens of the possibility to drive a clean, exciting, affordable electric car made in Europe. And they say, well, everything has to come from China. Nonsense. Look at what’s happening in our battery strategy, that’s moving fast forward. We’re becoming fast the first producers of batteries in the future. And these are sustainable batteries, recyclable batteries. Look at what we’re doing with solid state batteries, lighter batteries, batteries with more range. Look at the plans we have to create a charging infrastructure.
This is all very exciting stuff. Don’t chain us to the past, for heaven’s sake. Don’t chain an industry to the past that needs clarity and not loopholes to do what it needs to do to provide affordable mobility to all Europeans. This is, I believe, an essential choice.
And I implore you: do the right thing tomorrow. Don’t come with a wishy-washy solution that actually helps no one. It gives a bit of comfort – ‘yeah, we gave them a bit more time’ – but it’s not going to help them because then they will have to start building components for the new technology and then still building ever-decreasing numbers of components for the old technology, which will be so expensive.
One problem that our battery alliance has is, can we get enough people to work in this industry? That’s our main challenge. So don’t tell me that so many jobs will be lost because of this transition. The jobs will change. Our responsibility is to make sure that the people are able to take these new jobs. 
But there’s no need for anyone to be unemployed thanks to these new and exciting technologies. And since we are the best car-makers in the world, believe this petrol head, since we are the best car-makers in the world, our industry, if we embrace these opportunities, will dictate the future.
Who knows in this room that Poland already today is the biggest producer of electric buses? Who knows that? That’s embracing a new technology, that’s embracing the future. That’s the reason why I believe you need to vote for our proposal tomorrow."};"The speaker discusses electric vehicles (EVs) as a crucial aspect of the future of the European car industry. Here's a summary of what they say:

* The speaker, a petrol head who loves cars, acknowledges that the love for cars needs to change and evolve towards battery-powered vehicles.
* They emphasize that EVs are fun to drive, exciting, clean, and have exciting technology.
* Europe has finally caught up with other regions in terms of building electric cars that can compete with American and Asian manufacturers.
* The speaker argues that prolonging the transition to electric mobility by allowing loopholes for combustion engine cars will not help the car industry or consumers. Instead, it will slow down technological development and make electric cars more expensive.
* They highlight the benefits of electric cars, including their lower operating costs (electricity is 3-6 times cheaper than fuel per kilometer driven).
* The speaker mentions Europe's plans for rooftop solar, offshore wind, and creating opportunities for renewable energy, which will further reduce the cost of electricity.
* They emphasize that European citizens should have access to affordable, clean, and exciting electric cars made in Europe, rather than relying on imports from China.
* The speaker also discusses the development of sustainable batteries, recyclable batteries, solid-state batteries, and plans for a charging infrastructure, which are all exciting advancements in the field.
* Finally, they urge policymakers to make the right choice by voting for a proposal that supports the transition to electric mobility, rather than prolonging the use of combustion engine cars."};0;1;0;0;1;1;0;0;0;1;1;0;0;0;1;0;0;
"2022-06-07_7-81";"Chrysoula Zacharopoulou";"NA";" Madam President in office of the Council. - Mr. President, I wanted to express my gratitude for this rich discussion, which I followed with attention and interest and which demonstrates the Parliament's willingness to engage in a substantive debate on the proposals. Some of you mentioned the Paris Climate Agreement, which sets an ambition and imperative, that is, to keep the average global temperature increase during this century well below two degrees Celsius. As the annual United Nations climate conference in Bonn began yesterday with the aim of preparing for COP 27 in Sharm el-Sheikh, the European Union once again demonstrates its ability to address the most complex political issues.
     The strengthening of international cooperation on carbon pricing, for example through the establishment of a climate club parallel to the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism at the borders, or carbon pricing policies could be discussed and encouraged. As President of the Council, I can confirm our commitment to further progress in finding the right balance between climate protection and protecting our societies, particularly in economic terms.
     What is at stake here through the texts you will vote on and negotiate in a few weeks, what is at stake now and here, is the safeguarding of our future. And how the European Union will shape our common future is decided today in this Parliament. You also mentioned several times the texts on land use. We must protect our biodiversity and improve our carbon capture through carbon sinks. And of course, we need massive investment to succeed in the energy transition and reduce our carbon footprint. This passes through electric vehicles, of course, and a revision of the standards in this sector, which we will have to negotiate.
     I want to say this clearly here, concluding this debate: the energy transition is necessary and must not be experienced as a constraint. On the contrary, it is an opportunity and an opportunity to invest and innovate within Europe. Our researchers, our businesses are already working on it. We must be and we will be up to the task.
     Many of you have recalled the importance of energy sovereignty. The war in Ukraine has been a revelation of our dependence. The French Presidency has worked and continues to work tirelessly for our energy independence and to make the European Union more climate-sobriety.
     The Council therefore eagerly awaits the imminent vote result in Parliament and salutes the prospect of negotiations within the framework of trilogues in due course."};"According to the speech, it is mentioned that ""massive investment"" is needed to succeed in the energy transition and reduce carbon footprint, which ""passes through electric vehicles"". This implies that electric vehicles are an important part of the energy transition and reducing carbon emissions.

Additionally, it is stated that a revision of standards in the sector of electric vehicles will need to be negotiated."};0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2022-06-07_7-83";"Andrus Ansip";"Renew";"
    In short, - If the exhaust gas recirculation system operates in the engine's intake side, then the high temperature found in the exhaust gas is heated by a thick layer of soot and a turbulent flow of soot. Emitted gases in the human body correspond to the formed ozone. In particular, there is a high level of pollution in urban centers. Both ozone and nitrogen oxides are harmful to human health. There is a strong correlation between respiratory diseases and high levels of nitrogen dioxide and low levels of particulate matter. Therefore, the exhaust gas burden from cars will be minimized through minimum measures. Administratively, it is possible to reduce the use of diesel vehicles as much as necessary or as little as possible. I strongly support the promotion of electric car usage, especially in urban centers, where pollution is high. At the same time, road traffic emissions do not affect human health. There are currently no specific plans for banning the sale of new diesel cars by 2035. The ban on the sale of new diesel vehicles will end earlier than planned and European manufacturers will no longer be able to compete with other manufacturers. At the same time, a concrete signal will be sent to electric vehicle manufacturers and charging infrastructure providers and training institutions, narrowing the gap between electric car usage and nullifying the incentive for car use."};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned regarding electric vehicles:

1. The speaker strongly supports the promotion of electric car usage, especially in urban centers where pollution is high.
2. There is no specific plan for banning the sale of new diesel cars by 2035, but it will end earlier than planned.
3. European manufacturers will no longer be able to compete with other manufacturers due to the ban on new diesel vehicles.
4. The speaker believes that a concrete signal will be sent to electric vehicle manufacturers and charging infrastructure providers and training institutions, which will help narrow the gap between electric car usage and nullify the incentive for car use.

In summary, the speech emphasizes the importance of promoting electric vehicles, especially in urban areas with high pollution levels, and suggests that the ban on new diesel cars will have a positive impact on the electric vehicle industry."};0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2022-06-07_7-85";"Benoît Lutgen";"EPP";"
    By writing. – Today, we will vote on the Commission's proposal aimed at reducing CO2 emissions from cars and small trucks to reach 100% of the fleet with zero emissions in 2035, in other words ""going fully electric"" by that date.
    I oppose it for three reasons.
    It is an environmental mistake because it does not allow other technologies to develop and because we would not take into account the entire production cycle of batteries in the calculation of CO2.
    It is a social error: I am not sure that the electric car (EV) will be financially accessible to everyone in 2035. We must not further widen the gap between the rich and the poor. Nor should we strengthen the divide between urban and rural populations, which are more isolated than ever and suffering from a lack of infrastructure (charging stations).
    It is an error on the part of our strategic autonomy: 90% of lithium is refined in China. I do not want the EU to put its future partly in the hands of the Chinese. Europe should find its own technological solutions!"};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned related to electric vehicles:

1. The proposal aims for 100% of the fleet to have zero emissions by 2035, which means ""going fully electric"" by that date.
2. It is questioned whether electric cars (EVs) will be financially accessible to everyone in 2035, potentially widening the gap between rich and poor populations.
3. The lack of infrastructure (charging stations) in rural areas is mentioned as a concern for isolated populations.

These points highlight concerns about the feasibility, accessibility, and infrastructure support for electric vehicles in the future."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;1;0;
"2022-07-05_9-13";"Guido Reil";"ID";"
    Mr. President, dear colleagues! The Commission wants to strengthen social economy. That is basically correct. But is it about making the social economy more social, more human, for example by improving the working conditions of care staff? No.
    The Commission wants to make care climate-neutral. What a surprise! Particularly enthusiastic about this is the German Association for the Welfare of Workers. They are now exchanging their outdated vehicle fleet for electric cars, and that again on the shoulders of taxpayers. Because they have to pay for it again.
    And how is social economy basically designed in Germany? Social economy is mainly an auxiliary organization of parties and churches, and they enjoy special rights: tax benefits, labor law benefits, and they do not have to be particularly transparent either. Annual reports must not be published, which leads to major scandals every month - scandals over the boardrooms, where expensive limousines are leased, salaries of over 150,000.
    Dear members of Parliament, social economy is in large parts not social, it is anti-social. It exploits the community and against that we have to fight. We finally need transparency and justice in social economy."};"According to the speech, the German Association for the Welfare of Workers (presumably an organization related to social economy) is planning to replace their outdated vehicle fleet with electric cars. This change will be funded by taxpayers, as they have to pay for it again. That's all that is mentioned about electric vehicles in the text."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;1;0;
"2022-07-05_14-67";"Nathalie Colin-Oesterlé";"EPP";"
    Mr. President, Madam Commissioner, dear colleagues, we all agree to state that the fight against climate change will involve the end of fossil fuels, an unattainable goal without nuclear power.
    Look at the situation as it is. By 2050, just in France, the demand for electricity should increase by 35% with the development of electric vehicles or a clean hydrogen-based industry. Meanwhile, the geopolitical situation forces us to make the energy independence of our continent an absolute priority. Finally, as we debate, the means of producing renewable energies are intermittent and cannot meet a sudden increase in demand. Faced with this reality, the experts from the IPCC and the European Commission are clear: the ecological transition will not happen without complementing renewables with nuclear power.
    So tomorrow, at the vote, you will have the choice between supporting nuclear power and renewable energy to save the climate, build European energy independence, and end fossil fuels, or bury nuclear power, accept our dependence on coal, and extinguish any hope of reducing our greenhouse gas emissions."};"According to the speech, it is mentioned that:

* By 2050, the demand for electricity in France is expected to increase by 35% due to the development of:
	+ Electric vehicles (EVs)
	+ A clean hydrogen-based industry

This indicates that electric vehicles are one of the factors contributing to the increased demand for electricity in France."};0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2022-07-06_6-7";"Veronika Vrecionová";"ECR";" For the ECR group. - Dear Mrs. President of the European Parliament, dear Mrs. Commission President, Mr. Prime Minister Fialo, allow me to thank you very much for presenting the plans of the Czech Presidency. I believe that they fully correspond to the problems that Europe now has to face. It is evident that the two key topics will be related to Ukraine. The first one will be the reconstruction of Ukraine because a functioning and prosperous country on the eastern border of the European Union is important not only for the Ukrainians themselves but also for us, the members of the European Union. Granting candidate status to Ukraine is a good first step, but we need to come up with specific plans for reconstruction. The promises of help that we hear from many countries must be materialized on bank accounts from which we will pay for the reconstruction.
    With Ukraine, the current energy crisis is also related, which Europe is facing. Things are happening that this Parliament has been warning about for years. How many times have we warned here about the risk of extending the Nord Stream 2 pipeline? Now we must urgently work to ensure that we have affordable energy for our citizens. We must stop lying that we will still be able to choose which energy sources we like and which we consider not green enough. Our main task must be to mobilize all available resources, at least in the short term and medium term. For example, this is already happening in Germany, which is expanding electricity production from ""dirty"" coal-fired power plants. At the same time, it has the option of using nuclear energy without coal. We need to use the core. We must invest in its development, in new types of modular reactors. Today at noon we will vote on an objection to the taxonomy. On this vote, it will be shown who cares about the citizens, which ones are represented here. Who cares if the citizens will have something to heat, light or charge their electric cars. Because without nuclear power and gas, we cannot ensure enough energy."};"According to the speech, it is mentioned that ""charge their electric cars"" as one of the things citizens will have if they care about them. This is stated in the sentence: ""Who cares if the citizens will have something to heat, light or charge their electric cars.""

In summary, the text mentions electric vehicles (specifically, charging them) as a concern for citizens' daily lives, implying that access to affordable energy is necessary to support the use of electric vehicles."};0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2022-07-06_17-19";"Mislav Kolakušić";"NI";"
    Dear Madam President, dear colleagues, dear citizens, the European Investment Bank allocates tens of billions of euros collected from European Union citizens. It is claimed that it supports green policies. Many citizens of the European Union, including me, are wondering what exactly this European green policy is. Ten years ago, you all encouraged us to pull out those common old incandescent bulbs, banned the production of 60W bulbs and introduced energy-saving ones, allegedly, from 10-15W. Ten years later, therefore, we no longer save electrical energy, but we promote the purchase of electric cars and finance their production, which consume 100 kW of electrical energy daily. So, what is green policy? A 10W bulb or a 100 kW consumption electric car?"};"According to the speech, it is mentioned that:

* The European Investment Bank finances the production of electric cars.
* Electric cars consume 100 kW of electrical energy daily.

That's all the information provided about electric vehicles in the given text."};0;0;0;0;0;0;1;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2022-07-07_6-21";"Jorge Buxadé Villalba";"ECR";"
    Mr. President, today we have a report on better legislation, an example of how not to legislate: secretive, partial and incomprehensible. They still don't seem to realize or, even worse, they don't care that out there is an energy crisis due to their climate fanaticism, inflation, and price increases that will lead to the collapse of middle and working classes. What you propose is not better legislation, it is more legislation, in the same direction, the globalist agenda. Fifteen times climate is mentioned, zero, family. Five times the 2030 agenda and only once employment. The best thing about the Commission's proposal, which was ""for each additional rule, one rule less,"" you reject because the more rules, obligations, and burdens are imposed on families, businesses, and member states, the better for you.
    I propose how to legislate: do not make ridiculous and sectarian reports. Respect the Treaties and the Governments and Parliaments of the national states when they act within their competencies. Remove rules and regulations and, above all, do not legislate for yourselves or interested parties, but for the most in need: those who are out there and don't have an electric car or a chauffeur to take them home, but live desperate about the future that awaits them, without money in their pockets or safety on the streets."};"The text mentions electric vehicles only once, in the following sentence:

""...those who are out there and don't have an electric car or a chauffeur to take them home...""

This is a rhetorical device used by the speaker to emphasize their point about the struggles of ordinary people, implying that those who do not have access to electric cars (and presumably other luxuries) are struggling with financial insecurity and lack of safety. The mention of electric vehicles is incidental and serves only to illustrate the contrast between the privileged few and the majority of people who are struggling."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;
"2022-07-07_12-7";"Vlad Gheorghe";"Renew";"
    On behalf of the Renew group. - Mr. President, we began this session with a moment of silence for the victims of terrorism and climate change. Europe is facing extreme weather phenomena, from deadly heatwaves, droughts, wildfires, to tornadoes and devastating floods.
    Beyond material damage, all of these mean loss of human lives. Air pollution also kills over 400,000 Europeans annually. A cycling strategy is not therefore an easy topic, a summer one. It is an important piece in our fight for the future of Europe and it must happen quickly because we no longer have time.
    Cycling means sustainable transport and tourism, fighting pollution, energy independence from fuel consumption, economy and health for our citizens. Let's not forget that cyclotourism has already revitalized entire communities and given them a sustainable income. Let's not forget the strong demand for bicycles during the pandemic and the clear message sent by Europeans who are increasingly becoming fans of this means of transport.
    We urgently need infrastructure for cycling in all member states, from cycle paths to bike-sharing services and special parking lots. Europeans must be encouraged to use bicycles, and our duty is to provide them with a safe environment to do so. Local authorities must be helped to access the necessary funds without too much bureaucracy, simply and efficiently.
    And once again, I emphasize that the time for discussions has passed. It's time to act. If we don't do it, our children will not forgive us."};"There is no mention of electric vehicles in the provided speech. The text only talks about cycling as a means of sustainable transport, fighting pollution, energy independence from fuel consumption, economy, and health for citizens. It emphasizes the need for infrastructure for cycling, such as cycle paths, bike-sharing services, and special parking lots, to encourage Europeans to use bicycles and provide them with a safe environment to do so."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2022-07-07_12-10";"Chris MacManus";"The Left";"on behalf of the The Left Group. – Mr President, I want to welcome this debate, the development of an EU cycling strategy. I agree with the proposer of the debate that cycling should be acknowledged as a transport mode that is as valid as any other, and that its benefits in health and reduced road congestion should be recognised – not to mention the fact that a cycle strategy will be crucial to our efforts in tackling climate change and reducing our CO2 emissions.
Therefore, it is my genuine hope that this debate is the beginning of a real engagement with stakeholders from across our Member States, so that we can find a way to fully invest and implement safe and active mobility for all our citizens. Our roads and transport links are for everyone, cyclists included – whether you’re a student cycling to college, a nurse taking a bus to work, an electrician driving your van to a job.
When we debate cycle strategies, we are often bogged down in an ‘either-or’ argument. For too long, some politicians in Ireland have peddled the myth that you can only have cycling infrastructure or real infrastructure, but never both. For instance, take the Western Rail Corridor in the west of Ireland. The rail line has lay idle for years, while politicians have debated whether to reopen the rail line to passenger and freight or to turn the rail line into a green- and cycleway.
I’ve warned you: this ‘one or the other’ narrative really stifles us from harnessing our full potential, and it undermines our efforts to undo decades of neglect from successive governments, which has resulted in regional imbalance, which negatively affects West and North West Ireland. When we are talking about transport policy and the future of sustainable transport – whether it be active mobility on a bike or public transport on a train – let’s be ambitious. We have the capacity and the skill set to develop and invest in both. What we lack is the political will. There are many examples across Europe of greenways running alongside railway lines. I firmly believe there is no reason that this could not happen in the case of the Western Rail Corridor.
So let’s work to promote sustainable mobility. Let’s work to promote active mobility. Let’s work towards a transport strategy that serves all our citizens."};"There is no mention of electric vehicles in the provided speech. The speaker only mentions cycling, buses, and trains as modes of transportation, but does not mention electric vehicles at all. Therefore, there is no summary or information about electric vehicles that can be provided based on this text."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2022-10-04_3-45";"Tomáš Zdechovský";"EPP";" – Madam President, Commissioner, ladies and gentlemen, the topic of charging stations for that period of eight years, which I have spent in the European Parliament, we are already discussing for the second time here. I think that it is time to finally close this issue. There is a war on the borders of the EU. Energy prices in the European Union are rising and I believe that we have more important things to discuss than revisiting the topic of a single cable that will be used to charge our phones. Citizens of the EU rely on us and ask how we can help them solve the current situations they face. And I think that at this moment, it is time to close this debate, definitively approve the single charger, and move away from this topic. Ladies and gentlemen, please, let's devote ourselves to more important problems."};"There is no mention of electric vehicles in the provided speech. The speaker only mentions ""charging stations"" and ""a single cable that will be used to charge our phones"", which refers to charging electronic devices such as smartphones, not electric vehicles.

The speech focuses on the topic of a single charger for electronic devices and how it should be approved, rather than discussing electric vehicles or their charging infrastructure."};0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2022-10-17_14-3";"Ismail Ertug";"NA";"rapporteur. – Mr President, dear colleagues, I think we have committed ourselves to the Paris Agreement targets, and with the Fit for 55 package, we, as the European Union, have put this legislation on the table.
Within this legislation – I think it goes without saying – we have to decarbonise, in particular, the transport sector, and we see that individual transport as well as heavy—goods transport are still emitting very high emissions. Alternative and sustainable fuels are key to decarbonising and, in order to do so, we definitely need to overcome the bottleneck which is and which was for a long time the infrastructure. Therefore, dear colleagues, we have to fast roll out the infrastructure for alternative fuels.
Just let me go one step back in near history: in 2013, the European Commission already came up with legislation called AFID, the Alternative Fuels Infrastructure Directive, at that time, and this previous legislation was totally destroyed – I have to say that in these words – by the Member States, by the Council. If they had not completely undermined the legislation at that time, we would have had 677 000 charging stations across the European Union by the end of 2020. And even now, October 2022, we have, I would say, only 377 000 charging stations. Therefore, it was high time that the European Commission submitted the AFIR Regulation within the Fit for 55 package.
Two weeks ago, here, exactly at that place, we voted in the Transport Committee overwhelmingly with a majority for this report – 36 yes to no, and I clearly say charging must be as simple as filling up petrol if we want to make a success story out of it.
I don’t want to miss the opportunity to thank all my shadow colleagues from all the other groups. I guess we have now achieved strong and progressive elements. We have achieved charging stations every 60 kilometres, which will be obligatory until the end of 2025. We have also put in higher power output for light—duty vehicles, for heavy—duty vehicles and, in particular, for hydrogen infrastructure. We have also put more ambition into the hydrogen targets: refuelling hydrogen stations every 100 kilometre until the end of 2027.
We have also put into this legal regulation obligatory card payments on charging stations. We have included the electrification of and hydrogen for rail modes. On—shore power supply for ships until the end of 2030 and shoreside electricity for aircrafts until the end of 2025. We have also incorporated exemptions for outer regions and included data provisions which make user information easier. I proposed a European access point, which will also be established within this regulation. Now, hopefully, we will get the support from Members of Parliament on Wednesday at noon.
But still one remaining issue is open and for this, I want to ask for your support, dear colleagues, and it is the sanction mechanism. I just want to tell you frankly that this sanction mechanism has nothing to do with ideology. It’s just a tool to push the Member States towards the implementation of this regulation. Article 19(a) just says that the Member States need to implement a penalty mechanism for those charge point operators who don’t comply with the legislation. Full stop. We also included a recital stating that the European Commission will be demanded to fine Member States EUR 1 000 per non—installed charging station.
Ladies and gentlemen, dear colleagues, we have worked now, I would say, for a year and a half, extremely, extremely on this dossier, with all my colleagues on the different reports and the different committees. We had more than 1 000 amendments. We clustered all these amendments into different topics. We have put them all together. We made out of this more than 1 000 amendments, 18 compromise amendments, and we brought 17 of them through, two weeks ago within the Transport Committee.
Now it’s up to us to take the next step. The next step is to vote for it in this House, and then we have to go to the trilogues, where we already have fixed two dates for trilogues with the Czech Presidency. I think we did our utmost as European Parliamentarians. Now it’s up to you to vote and to follow my and our line. I’m really optimistic that this will be the starting point of a new European era where we can install infrastructure for alternative fuels, alternative technology. Once again, no Green Deal without new technologies."};"The speech does not specifically mention electric vehicles. However, it mentions ""alternative and sustainable fuels"" as key to decarbonizing the transport sector, and ""charging stations"" as part of the infrastructure needed for alternative fuels.

It is mentioned that there are currently 377,000 charging stations in the European Union, compared to a target of 677,000 by the end of 2020. The speaker notes that this is due to the previous legislation being undermined by Member States.

The speech also mentions ""light-duty vehicles"" and ""heavy-duty vehicles"", which could potentially include electric vehicles, but it does not specify whether they are referring to electric or other types of vehicles.

Overall, while the speech does not specifically mention electric vehicles, it discusses the need for infrastructure for alternative fuels, including charging stations, as part of efforts to decarbonize the transport sector."};0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2022-10-17_14-8";"Bronis Ropė";"NA";"
    Regional power committee advisor. - Dear colleagues, dear Commissioner Gerbiamas, dear President of the European Union. I hope that by ensuring the independence of the European Union, we will have to answer the question of dependence on a distorted currency. The assessment of alternative fuel infrastructure projects for heavy goods vehicles is an essential task.
    Of course, no region or territory of the European Union can be left behind. At present, the public charging infrastructure for electric vehicles in the European Union is not very developed. And this is a big problem.
    Europe will only be as strong as its ability to reach even one EU country or non-EU territory with electric mobility. And it doesn't matter how many people live in a specific place - as long as electric mobility cannot be charged while driving anywhere in the European Union, we cannot assume that users will accept slow charging. Let's work together and strive for common goals."};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned related to electric vehicles:

1. The public charging infrastructure for electric vehicles in the European Union is not very developed.
2. This lack of development is considered a big problem.
3. Electric mobility (presumably referring to electric vehicles) needs to be able to reach every EU country and non-EU territory, otherwise, users will not accept slow charging.

In summary, the speaker highlights the need for improvement in the public charging infrastructure for electric vehicles across the European Union, emphasizing its importance for widespread adoption of electric mobility."};0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2022-10-17_14-13";"Roman Haider";"ID";"
    On behalf of the ID faction. - Mr. President! There is so much to criticize in the current EU transport policy that I honestly do not know where to start. So, to the essential problem right at the beginning: Plans for the abolition of fossil fuels mean a disaster for the economy and the everyday life of citizens. And the expansion of infrastructure for alternative fuels is completely pointless as long as a fundamental problem is not solved: Where will the power come from for the millions of electric cars?
    Road, rail, air transport, shipping - all areas of the transport sector should switch to alternative fuels. Just to meet the unrealistic timetable and achieve the totally exaggerated goals of this proposal, billions in investments will be needed - and all that without ensuring a reliable and affordable power supply beforehand. A reliable and affordable supply for the highly industrialized EU member states with wind and solar parks is technically not possible. We will therefore continue to be partially dependent on fossil fuels to a certain extent. The rules of physics and technology cannot be replaced by ideological daydreams.
    And from all the other problems that these utopian plans bring with them - job losses, loss of mobility, loss of know-how or increasing dependence on critical raw materials such as lithium or rare earths or problems in waste disposal and recycling, etc. - I am not even talking about that yet. And let's not forget that we are currently also in a dramatic energy and supply crisis.
    Look the facts in the face! With these plans, poverty in transport is being driven further. Mobility will become a luxury good, especially in rural areas. Set realistic and technically implementable plans for energy supply in the EU countries finally. Only then can we talk about how the expansion of infrastructure for electric cars looks like."};"According to the speech, the speaker criticizes the EU's plans to abolish fossil fuels and expand infrastructure for alternative fuels, specifically mentioning electric cars. The main points made about electric vehicles are:

1. The speaker questions where the power will come from to charge millions of electric cars.
2. They argue that a reliable and affordable power supply is not technically possible using wind and solar parks in highly industrialized EU member states.
3. As a result, the speaker believes that the EU will still be partially dependent on fossil fuels to some extent.
4. The speaker also mentions the potential problems associated with electric cars, such as job losses, loss of mobility, dependence on critical raw materials like lithium or rare earths, and issues with waste disposal and recycling.

Overall, the speaker is skeptical about the feasibility and practicality of expanding infrastructure for electric cars without ensuring a reliable and affordable power supply."};0;1;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;1;1;
"2022-10-17_14-17";"Andor Deli";"NI";"
    Dear Mr. President! The alternative fuel infrastructure is very important, however, the EP proposal unfortunately does not take into account the differences between the Member States, nor that the construction of charging stations requires a massive prior reinforcement of the energy infrastructure. These further costs would be a heavy burden for the Member States, especially in a period when the economic crisis and the risk of recession are looming. It is possible that there will also be problems with the utilization of the infrastructure to be built. On the one hand, because electrically powered vehicles are prohibitively expensive for the majority of European citizens, on the other hand, because the car industry is hampered by supply chain disruptions and there is not enough electric cars on the market. The greening should be inclusive. I think that more emphasis should be placed on the tailoring of regulations and the appropriate support system. Paper can withstand everything, but the citizens of the Union need realistic, achievable regulation."};"According to the speech, it is mentioned that:

* Electrically powered vehicles are prohibitively expensive for the majority of European citizens.
* There is not enough electric cars on the market due to supply chain disruptions.

In other words, the speaker is highlighting two challenges related to electric vehicles: their high cost and limited availability."};0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;
"2022-10-17_14-20";"Anna Deparnay-Grunenberg";"Greens/EFA";"
    Mr. President, Madam Commissioner, dear colleagues! Gas and oil are a thing of the past. They promote war, climate crisis, air pollution. Each of these points is reason enough to move away from combustion engines and towards alternative drives to be limitlessly mobile. Anyone who buys an electric car should be able to rely on the existing charging infrastructure. Charging columns must be available and reliable throughout Europe. User-friendly payment must become standard, with the motto: Charge as easily as filling up.
    And more: We do not need change only on the road. Only a little more than half of the rail network in Europe is electrified today, and the rail can do more. 100% green electricity and 100% electric - throughout Europe. Two obstacles to clean infrastructure must be corrected by Wednesday. Firstly: Smaller airports outside the TEN-T corridors have their contribution to make. Above all, owners and owners of business and private jets have enough money in their pockets to pay their share, and they must also electrify their infrastructure. The rich should not be exempt from responsibility.
    The second obstacle is the expansion of LNG for trucks and shipping. Clean mobility looks different there. Let's turn the game around: Where there is no alternative, LNG should only be possible where there is demand. The shift in drive technology goes hand in hand with the transport transition."};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned related to electric vehicles:

1. The speaker emphasizes that gas and oil are a thing of the past and promotes moving away from combustion engines towards alternative drives, including electric cars.
2. It is stated that anyone who buys an electric car should be able to rely on the existing charging infrastructure, with charging columns being available and reliable throughout Europe.
3. The speaker suggests that user-friendly payment methods for charging electric vehicles should become standard, with the goal of making it as easy to charge as filling up a gas tank.

These are the main points mentioned in the speech regarding electric vehicles."};0;0;1;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;
"2022-10-17_14-22";"Beata Mazurek";"ECR";"
    Madam President! Madam Commissioner! Dear Members of State! We must state the matter clearly: the European market for electromobility is very diverse and any infrastructure plans must take into account these differences. The fact that users of electric vehicles will be able to use charging and hydrogen refuelling stations every 60 and 100 kilometers sounds great, but representing Poland, which is at the beginning of its journey towards electromobility, I firmly demand extending the vacatio legis allowing preparation for the implementation of the objectives set out in the project.
    
    The development of alternative fuel infrastructure must be linked to the increase in the number of vehicles powered by such fuels. Building many stations for a relatively low number of vehicles is economically unjustified and will entail high public costs, heavily burdening national budgets. Especially now, at a time when we are facing an energy crisis and high inflation. We also ask: how many families from less affluent member states can currently afford to buy such cars? Achieving ambitious transport zero and low-emission goals? Yes. But in conjunction with the real market situation for electric vehicles and respecting countries at different stages of electromobility development. I hope that during negotiations with the Council, a more equitable compromise extending the implementation time for regulations can be found."};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned related to electric vehicles:

1. The European market for electromobility (electric vehicles) is diverse, and any infrastructure plans must take into account these differences.
2. Users of electric vehicles will be able to use charging and hydrogen refueling stations every 60 and 100 kilometers, which sounds great.
3. Poland, at the beginning of its journey towards electromobility, demands extending the vacation legis (implementation time) allowing preparation for the implementation of objectives set out in the project.
4. The development of alternative fuel infrastructure (such as electric vehicles) must be linked to the increase in the number of vehicles powered by such fuels.
5. Building many stations for a relatively low number of vehicles is economically unjustified and will entail high public costs, heavily burdening national budgets.
6. The affordability of electric vehicles is questioned, with the speaker asking how many families from less affluent member states can currently afford to buy such cars.

Overall, the speech emphasizes the need for a more equitable approach to implementing electromobility infrastructure, taking into account the diversity of the European market and the real market situation for electric vehicles."};0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;
"2022-10-17_14-23";"Elena Kountoura";"The Left";"
    Dear Mr. President, Madam Commissioner, the European Green Agreement envisages a reduction of at least 90% in emissions by 2050 for the area of transfers. The transition to electricity and sustainability has multiple benefits for the climate, the environment, and for human health. Therefore, there is a basic expectation for this reduction and for the continuation of citizens moving around without being charged, which is the availability of charging stations where it is needed in daily life: on public roads, in professional spaces, supermarkets, and shopping centers. It is also important to have access to charging points and taxis at locations where they wait for passengers because they travel tens of thousands of kilometers every day.
    Finally, I would like to point out that for green transport to succeed, it must be fair. There should be sufficient European and national funding for infrastructure, vehicles should have reasonable costs, and - above all - we must not forget that the basic barrier to transport will be shared mobility, in which unfortunately until today no attention is given as it deserves."};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned related to electric vehicles:

1. The transition to electricity (implying electric vehicles) has multiple benefits for the climate, environment, and human health.
2. Charging stations are necessary for citizens to move around without being charged, which is important for daily life on public roads, in professional spaces, supermarkets, shopping centers, and at taxi locations where passengers wait.
3. The cost of vehicles should be reasonable.

No specific details about electric vehicles themselves (e.g., their performance, range, or technology) are mentioned in the text."};0;0;1;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;
"2022-10-17_14-29";"Sylvia Limmer";"ID";"
    Mr. President, dear colleagues! In the context of Green Deal, Climate Act and Fit-for-55 package, Brussels now wants to determine which fuels should be allowed for free passenger transport in the future. The latest ecosocialist climate egg that is about to be laid in Brussels is the EU-wide ban on combustion engines. It should be finalized by the end of October. And since there is still a lack of an appropriate infrastructure, a regulation is now being pushed through that should regulate this. But even Germany, currently the rather unfortunate world champion in green idiocy, fails. They are pathetically failing to add the necessary number of charging stations annually. The Netherlands and Germany account for almost 60 percent of all charging points in the EU. The required one million charging stations across the EU by 2025 are therefore already a joke.
    In addition, every additional power requirement leads to an increased need for fossil energy carriers in electricity production. Not only is emissions-free mobility a green fairy tale, but citizens should also no longer own their own cars, they should ride bicycles or use public transport. Therefore: I categorically reject the abolition of the social market economy by political bans and state subsidies. Because nothing else is the interference of Brussels technocrats in the personal property rights of citizens and the innovative strength of our economy."};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned related to electric vehicles:

1. The EU-wide ban on combustion engines is being considered, which should be finalized by the end of October.
2. Germany is failing to add the necessary number of charging stations annually, despite accounting for almost 60 percent of all charging points in the EU along with the Netherlands.
3. It is mentioned that there is a lack of an appropriate infrastructure for electric vehicles, and a regulation is being pushed through to regulate this.
4. The speaker criticizes the idea of having one million charging stations across the EU by 2025, calling it a ""joke"".
5. The speaker also mentions that every additional power requirement leads to an increased need for fossil energy carriers in electricity production, implying that electric vehicles may not be as emissions-free as they seem.

Overall, the speech expresses skepticism and criticism towards the development of electric vehicles and the infrastructure needed to support them."};0;0;0;0;1;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2022-10-17_14-31";"Alessandra Moretti";"S&D";"
    Mr. President, esteemed colleagues, this regulation under discussion is extremely important.
    Indeed, the availability of charging and refueling infrastructure primarily for cars, light commercial vehicles, and trucks, but also for the maritime and aviation sectors, is a key parameter to determine the future market share of low and zero-emission vehicles in Europe in the coming years. The more charging points there will be, the more attractive it will be for consumers and operators to switch to cleaner propulsion technologies, such as electric and hydrogen vehicles.
    We are facing a crossroads today: with this legislative act, we will define the path for the next decades in the mobility sector, and it is an important step towards an energy-independent Europe, thanks to renewable green sources. Having enough adequate, efficient, and easily accessible charging points is the most correct way to truly make our commitment to achieving the objectives of the Climate Law and REPowerEU possible.
    For a clean Europe, an energy-autonomous Europe, a stronger Europe."};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned related to electric vehicles:

1. The availability of charging infrastructure for low and zero-emission vehicles, including electric vehicles, is crucial for determining their market share in Europe.
2. Electric vehicles are considered a ""cleaner propulsion technology"" that consumers and operators may switch to with more charging points available.
3. Having adequate, efficient, and easily accessible charging points is necessary to achieve the objectives of the Climate Law and REPowerEU, which aims for an energy-independent Europe.

In summary, electric vehicles are mentioned as one type of low-emission vehicle that benefits from a well-developed charging infrastructure, and their adoption is seen as a key step towards achieving climate goals and energy independence in Europe."};0;0;0;0;1;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2022-10-17_14-39";"Izaskun Bilbao Barandica";"Renew";"
    Mr. President, Madam Commissioner, I would like to express my support for these initiatives because the deployment of a sufficient, visible and accessible infrastructure for charging and refueling alternative fuels is an essential prerequisite for the decarbonization of transport.
    It obliges the industry to innovate in the production of vehicles and fuels. But legislators must also offer legal security to the industry and guarantees to professionals in the transport sector and citizenship on the network of charging points. We need to prioritize the deployment of these infrastructures in the main grid of the TEN-T networks and also guarantee simpler and more homogeneous means of payment than those that exist today, especially for electric mobility. The current dispersion discourages as much as the lack of charging points.
    As for the legislation on low-emission renewable fuels for the maritime sector, I once again advocate making the transition with and not against the industry. The savings announced in indirect costs associated with pollution and operational improvements should be applied to innovation. A huge opportunity is opening up for European shipbuilding to consolidate our global leadership in sustainable solutions for this mode of transport. We have an obligation to take advantage of it.
    Finally, I would like to draw attention to the sensitivity we must have on this subject with regard to the overseas regions. They are particularly dependent on maritime transport. Let us justify well the exceptions, but admit the specificity of these territories."};"According to the speech, something related to electric vehicles is mentioned as follows:

* The speaker advocates for simpler and more homogeneous means of payment for charging points, especially for electric mobility.
* The current dispersion of charging points discourages the use of electric vehicles.

That's all that is said about electric vehicles in the text."};0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2022-10-17_14-40";"Benoît Lutgen";"EPP";"
    Mr. President, Madam Commissioner, dear colleagues, this regulation provides answers, milestones, and objectives for the aviation sector, for the maritime sector, and also for the road sector, particularly for heavy goods transport and for light vehicles. However, let us recognize that for motorists and in relation to their concerns - especially not having enough charging points - this text does not go far enough: it only covers the Trans-European Network. It will be urgent to provide a quick response for all areas, for the entire network, so that obligations also allow for easing the population's fears.
    
    There are many concerns. Can I afford an electric vehicle? Can I afford its operation? Will there be enough charging stations near my home? This is of course an issue for citizens, their employment and work. It is an economic, tourist issue. And therefore, quickly, we will have to add a whole series of obligations, especially to ensure that the network is sufficient throughout all European roads.
    
    I will end by saying that the all-electric as it is decided - I did not vote for this all-electric - is madness to me, particularly in terms of dependence on China. The European strategy and innovation have lost a lot with this objective set for 2035 at 100%. A target of 90% would have allowed for flexibility for the market, for new technologies as well."};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned related to electric vehicles:

1. The current regulation does not go far enough in addressing concerns of motorists regarding electric vehicles, particularly the lack of charging points.
2. There is concern among citizens about whether they can afford an electric vehicle and its operation.
3. Another concern is the availability of charging stations near their homes.
4. The speaker believes that it is urgent to provide a quick response to these concerns by ensuring a sufficient network of charging stations throughout all European roads.
5. The speaker expresses opposition to the goal of making all vehicles electric, citing dependence on China and a lack of flexibility for the market and new technologies.

Overall, the speech highlights the need for more action to support the adoption of electric vehicles, particularly in terms of infrastructure and affordability."};0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;1;0;
"2022-10-17_14-41";"Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska";"EPP";" - Madam President! Madam Commissioner! Dear Members of State! Electrification and decarbonization of transport is a key element of the plan for a green Europe. However, we must remember that no transport operator and no consumer will invest in low- or zero-emission vehicles if they cannot be sure that they can operate them according to their needs, which means the possibility of fast charging. If we want to convince European citizens to switch to e-mobility, charging cars should be as easy as refueling today. When looking at statistics and the number of charging points, we see that there is a lot to do.
    We must also remember that there are countries where most of the electrical energy still comes from coal. Therefore, compliance with these regulations in the current socio-economic and political situation may prove very problematic. But we must take this situation into account. That is why I agree, support the report, and congratulate the gentleman rapporteur. I agree with Madam Commissioner who said that we need very ambitious goals, but achievable and attainable ones."};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned related to electric vehicles:

1. Electrification and decarbonization of transport is a key element of the plan for a green Europe.
2. Low- or zero-emission vehicles will not be invested in by transport operators and consumers unless they can operate them according to their needs, which includes the possibility of fast charging.
3. Charging cars should be as easy as refueling today if we want to convince European citizens to switch to e-mobility (electric mobility).
4. There is a lot to do when looking at statistics and the number of charging points.

In summary, the speech emphasizes the importance of electric vehicles in achieving a green Europe, highlights the need for fast charging infrastructure to support their adoption, and acknowledges that there are challenges to overcome in terms of the current state of electrical energy production."};0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;
"2022-10-17_14-47";"Ismail Ertug";"NA";"
    Reporter. - Mr. President! I believe it has become clear once again that it is important to support this dossier, especially because we need the infrastructure to solve what is called the ""chicken and egg"" problem. I believe we have achieved this in electromobility. This can be seen in the rapid development of various technologies and the sales figures for vehicles.
    But the same must also work for hydrogen technology. We are now at a point where the industry is hesitant to react because it wants to invest, but does not yet see the infrastructure. And the infrastructure operators will not act for the same reasons. I believe that with this ambitious approach, we can move the goals of hydrogen technology compared to the Commission proposal three years forward and also reduce the distances between different infrastructures. By providing a strong incentive to build a redundant system over the next few years, we give a strong incentive for both systems - electrification and infrastructure development.
    Why do I think we need both systems - electrification and infrastructure building? Firstly, because it has been mentioned: We do not have the grid everywhere that can simply electrify everything. Where we can ultimately balance the grid, in my opinion, there is a good use of hydrogen. That would actually be the mix that will help us in the future in the European Union to decarbonize our mobility and our mobility sector.
    We know for sure that we need enough electrification and energy. Therefore, this will not work alone either. We will also have to import from other regions of this earth. But we must pursue this with REPowerEU - and I believe we will do this well - support my amendments."};"According to the speech, electromobility (electric vehicles) has achieved rapid development and sales figures are increasing. This is mentioned as an example of how infrastructure can be developed to solve the ""chicken and egg"" problem, where both the industry and infrastructure operators need each other to move forward.

The speaker also mentions that electrification is not a solution everywhere, as there may not be a grid available in all areas. However, they suggest that hydrogen technology could be used in these areas to balance the grid, implying that electric vehicles are not a viable option for every location.

Overall, the text highlights the progress made in electromobility (electric vehicles) and suggests that it is one part of a broader solution to decarbonize mobility, alongside hydrogen technology."};0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;
"2022-10-17_14-49";"Eugen Jurzyca";"ECR";"
    It's up to you. – The European Parliament will vote on the obligation for electric charging stations for cars to be available at least every 60 km on all highways and express roads by the end of 2025. Presenters did not demonstrate that there is a higher demand for capacities of electric charging stations than supply, and even less so that the private sector is so paralyzed that it would not be able to build charging stations for its own initiative where there is demand. We will vote against because I consider this to be the wrong path in the fight against greenhouse gas emissions. If we go further, we will centrally evaluate, for example, the density of manufacturers of electric charging stations and components into them. In my opinion, a better solution would be if the state internalized negative externalities (greenhouse gas emissions) and the market would cover the surplus (production and purchase of cars with alternative drive, their charging, production of charging, ...). The market (that is, the citizens themselves) would make better decisions about whether electric cars are a more effective tool in the fight against greenhouse gas emissions than working from home, bicycles, roller skates or, for example, more flexible commuting. And also about where charging stations are needed every 20 km and where enough every 200."};"According to the speech, the European Parliament will vote on an obligation for electric charging stations to be available at least every 60 km on all highways and express roads by the end of 2025. The speaker argues against this proposal, stating that there is no evidence of a higher demand for capacities of electric charging stations than supply, and that the private sector would not be paralyzed from building charging stations where there is demand.

The speaker also mentions that they consider electric cars to be one tool in the fight against greenhouse gas emissions, but suggests that the market (citizens themselves) should make decisions about whether electric cars are effective in this regard, rather than relying on central evaluation and regulation. They propose internalizing negative externalities (greenhouse gas emissions) through state policies, which would allow the market to cover the surplus of production and purchase of cars with alternative drives.

In summary, the text discusses the proposal for mandatory electric charging stations every 60 km on highways and express roads, and argues against it based on a lack of evidence of demand exceeding supply. It also touches on the idea that electric vehicles are one tool in the fight against greenhouse gas emissions, but suggests that market forces should play a greater role in determining their effectiveness."};0;0;0;0;1;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2022-10-18_11-6";"Philippe Lamberts";"Greens/EFA";"on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group. – Mr President, dear colleagues, really striking to see how much interest a debate on the Commission work programme for 2023 elicits here in this House. I’d like to spend my two and a half minutes talking to my friends of the European People’s Party, arguably the biggest group in this Parliament.
Let me just tell you a story. Forty years ago, the European car industry convinced the European Union not to regulate them. They promised: ‘We are going to reduce emissions, improve our product and all the rest of it. Trust us. Don’t regulate us’. And they succeeded.
Now, when they failed to deliver, the European Union started regulating them and putting them emission targets. And then they fought tooth and nail against really ambitious targets. When that failed, then they started fighting to make sure that the measurements – the way we would measure the emissions – would be totally removed from reality. They succeeded. But of course, when the European Union reconsidered and started measuring real emissions, then they started cheating.
What is the net result of that? Well, the world champions of the electric cars are Tesla (US), Build Your Dreams (Chinese). That is the net result of such a strategy. And the European People’s Party was aiding and abetting the strategy of the European car industry, not least Angela Merkel, who even destroyed a trilogue deal just to weaken the objectives.
Now the EPP does it again, targeting the REACH regulation. And of course in the name of moratorium, one in, one out, because all this, you know, is a burden on our companies. A burden? Are you serious? We are talking about keeping this planet liveable for humanity. You call that a burden or the hobbyhorse of the Greens? It is about life and death – right? – and also about leadership, industrial leadership. And your calls have been partly heard.
Maroš, I regret to say that, because indeed the European Commission delayed by three quarters the revision of the landmark Chemicals Regulation of the European Union, whereas actually this text is almost ripe. Don’t do this. I mean, don’t listen to the, not the sirens, but the cries of the European People’s Party. By the way – when I have to judge as to their presence – they do not carry a lot of weight. Ignore them.
I mean, yes, I know you put that on the fourth quarter, but there’s no legal obligation for the Commission not to be earlier if you already do it. And so at least this Parliament will be able to adopt it in the first reading before the end of the term."};"The text mentions electric vehicles indirectly, by mentioning Tesla as one of the ""world champions"" of electric cars. This is mentioned in the context of criticizing the European car industry for not taking action on reducing emissions 40 years ago, and instead relying on promises that were not fulfilled. The speaker suggests that this lack of action has led to other companies, such as Tesla (a US-based company) and Build Your Dreams (a Chinese company), becoming leaders in electric cars.

The text does not provide any further information about electric vehicles or their development, but rather uses them as an example to illustrate the consequences of the European car industry's lack of action on reducing emissions."};0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;
"2022-10-18_11-11";"Maroš Šefčovič";"NA";" Vice-President of the Commission. – Mr President, I would also like to thank all honourable Members for their interventions, for their support, for their critical remarks, for their encouragement to work on some of the files faster than we propose in the Commission work programme. And I can assure you that we will do our utmost to come up with the proposals as soon as they are ready, as soon as they are of good quality.
If you would allow me to be a little bit more concrete, I would also like to thank the honourable Members and subscribe to what Mr Olbrycht said that indeed we had good cooperation and a good exchange of views between the committees, between the Conference of Presidents, and I think that such good cooperation, that this spirit of partnership, would be very important this year and the whole of next year because, as Mr Olbrycht rightly points out, now we are working for the legacy of this legislator, of this Parliament. The people will judge us in the future on how we managed to cope with these unprecedented crises: COVID-19, economic challenges, Russian aggression against Ukraine, and how we demonstrated that we can adapt to these new challenges and the new situations. And I think that if you look at it from the perspective of how we dealt so far with the crisis, we managed the COVID-19 situation, we introduced the Next Generation EU budget, we are really coming up with unprecedented proposals when it comes to energy. And we will have a whole-morning discussion on this tomorrow, and the discussion on this package in the College in the Commission was just about to conclude as I was leaving to meet you and address the plenary on our Commission work programme. So we will have the whole debate about this tomorrow. But I can confirm to Mr Olbrycht that, yes, another analysis and revision of the MFF will be presented in the second quarter of the next year. This will give us an opportunity to look at how we managed with the MFF that we have at out disposal, how it works in combination with Next Generation EU, and what are the challenges we have to meet in this regard in future years to come.
To Mr Marques, I again would like to reassure you and, of course, the S&D Group that the social dimension is very important to the European Commission. We are already preparing for what most probably will be another social summit to be held again in Porto in the spring of next year. And that when it comes to the concrete deliverables, you are very aware of the action plan on how to implement the European Pillar of Social Rights, which was adopted and which we are gradually fulfilling and bringing to fruition one by one, and we will definitely continue with that.
What I think would be very important – and this would be my request to the whole European Parliament – tomorrow we will be debating the energy situation. Mr Papademos and also several other honourable Members asked to intervene on this topic. So you will see the package we are proposing. But I think what will be very important for all of you, especially for citizens of Europe, is how can we help them also financially in this very difficult situation when it comes to the vulnerable households, when it comes to the to the SMEs, when it comes to big industry. I think for the SMEs and households, we would have a recipe for how to help. But we need your assistance to get REPowerEU to be finally adopted by the Council and the Parliament. We need to push it over the finishing line because it creates the possibility to use the financial firepower we have to help SMEs and households. And it would be my plea that we should treat this file as the top priority of all of us, because that is the vehicle we can use to help the SMEs and to help the households, and to liberate space for the governments across Europe to use State aid to help the energy-intensive industries, because we know that it’s very important.
I totally agree with Mr Azmani that we should be masters of our destiny. We should be those who shape the world, because we Europeans value human rights, we value the rule of law, we are fighting for the environment, we are fighting to make sure that rules and international law are respected across the world. And for that we need to do much more, we need to be – I totally agree with you – more autonomous, stronger in energy, stronger in critical raw materials, to be sure that we can invest even more and become stronger when it comes to all future-oriented new technologies – be it renewables, be it hydrogen or be it electric vehicles.
To come back to Mr Marques on some of the concrete responses on social policies and social measures, I think one which will be clearly felt by every single citizen across Europe is our proposal, which we are going to present to you, to digitalise and create a European social security pass. This would be something like a European social card, which would again help our citizens to use the freedoms of the European Union, offer the guarantees, increase the flexibility of how they can benefit from the size of the European labour market. And we are also looking in great depth at how SURE was used. What are the results, what are the conclusions and how can we use that experience for our future work?
Mr Azmani also referred to the trade agreements. You will see from our Commission work programme that we would like to push further our cooperation in the field of trade with Chile, with Mexico, with New Zealand, with other countries too, just to simply make sure that we remain this very important trading superpower that we are, and to bring also our approach with a new type of trade agreement where we take care of sustainable development, high-quality environmental standards and respect for social standards too.
To respond to Mr Lamberts, I totally agree with him that the future is electric, and you know how much we have worked on this through our European Battery Alliance. It would seem we set a very good example because we see the focus the United States of America is putting on this very technology. We have to make sure that we would be absolutely competitive in that regard.
Concerning REACH, right now we are finalising our impact assessment, we are finalising our consultations with the key stakeholders and we are also creating the space, a good feed-in, for our regulatory scrutiny board. I can assure you that once this file is ready, we will not hesitate to present it to Parliament and to the Council.
If you allow me to close with one additional request: if you would look through our annexes, you will find not only the annex about what we want to do next year, but also one on the pending files which we now have at different stages of trilogues. It’s 116 files. 116 files! So I think that we again have to talk between us, the two communitarian institutions, the European Parliament and the Commission, on how we are going to accelerate the work on these spending files. So that next year, when I come to see you, we can say that this list is much shorter, that we delivered on the spending files and that we would focus on the right priorities and we will have the next occasion when we will be working on this joint declaration of priority files for the next year. So to repeat my two requests at the end: REPowerEU and pending files, because this would help us to move to better territory and to respond to the expectations of our citizens. "};"In the speech, Vice-President of the Commission mentions electric vehicles (EVs) once. The relevant passage is:

""...to be sure that we can invest even more and become stronger when it comes to all future-oriented new technologies – be it renewables, be it hydrogen or be it electric vehicles.""

This sentence suggests that the European Commission values investing in research and development of electric vehicles as a key area for growth and competitiveness. The Vice-President also mentions that the United States is focusing on this technology, implying that Europe should do the same to remain competitive.

There is no further discussion about electric vehicles in the speech."};0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2022-11-09_11-39";"Sylvia Limmer";"ID";"
    Mr. President! In the demands of the European Council on energy, anyone with a sound mind can only wonder. The solutions should be more energy savings and even more non-grid-dependent renewable energies. But it is precisely this latter one that our dependence on cheap Russian gas has given us.
    So, it is the own crazy green ideology plus sanctions policy plus energy shortage and price increase that has led to the energy crisis - and exactly the opposite, namely more CO2 emissions. Not because we are now experiencing a renaissance of coal in the EU. Even China burns more coal than the rest of the world, also to supply us with batteries and raw materials for supposedly emission-free electric cars. Green wind energy is not the energy of future industrial nations. It is nuclear energy.
    And about the fact that in the EU Russian LNG is bought ten times more expensive and with ten times more CO2 emissions than pipeline gas through the detour China, one keeps silent on this as well."};"According to the speech, it is mentioned that:

* China burns more coal than the rest of the world, partly to supply Europe with batteries and raw materials for supposedly emission-free electric cars.
* The speaker implies that the production of these electric cars contributes to CO2 emissions.

That's all the information about electric vehicles mentioned in the text."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2022-11-09_14-17";"Milan Uhrík";"NI";" – Dear Mr. President, dear colleagues, do you want to revitalize Europe energetically? I will tell you what needs to be done. In the first place, it is necessary to abolish those counterproductive energy anti-Russian sanctions. It doesn't matter to me how many billions you kill yachts with. It doesn't matter to me how many politicians you prevent from entering. The idea that by blackmailing millions of European families and liquidating European industry, you are punishing Putin is completely twisted. The second thing that needs to be done is to rationalize those ridiculous European green plans. Just think about it. On the one hand, you require a reduction in electricity production because oil is bad, gas is bad, nuclear power plants are bad, and thermal power plants are bad. On the other hand, you require an increase in electricity consumption and that from 2030 only people will be given electric cars. These are two completely opposite logical concepts whose result must be a collapse. You know, this energy crisis is not the result of the fact that there was no energy in the world. It is the result of stupid decisions made by stupid politicians."};"According to the speech, it is mentioned that:

* From 2030 onwards, people will be given electric cars.

That's the only mention of electric vehicles in the text. The speaker criticizes European green plans for requiring a reduction in electricity production while also increasing electricity consumption, which they argue will lead to a collapse."};0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2022-11-09_14-59";"Robert Hajšel";"S&D";"
    Pismomne. - Inclusion of the Repower program in national renewable energy plans will allow Slovakia and other member states to draw more European funds for projects related to increasing the safety of their energy supplies and the share of renewable sources in energy production. Although, in the perspective of five to ten years, this will also contribute to lower dependence on fuel imports from Russia, not only for Slovakia but also in general, it will not help much in the coming year, which will be crucial for the survival of at least 10 companies in the fields of industry, energy and transport. According to experts, Europe will face a deficit of around 30 billion cubic meters of Russian gas next year, which can only be covered by measures from the Repower program focusing on the development of renewable sources and increasing energy efficiency for 2023. A short-term solution that would allow us to survive would be immediate support for natural gas, oil and biogas production, as well as mainly the materials needed for self-production of solar panels, wind turbines and electric car batteries."};"According to the text, it is mentioned that ""mainly the materials needed for self-production of solar panels, wind turbines and electric car batteries"" would be an immediate solution to help Europe survive the upcoming deficit of Russian gas. This implies that the production of electric car batteries is one of the areas where support could be provided in the short-term to address this issue."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;
"2022-11-22_2-15";"Benoît Lutgen";"EPP";"
    Mr. President, Madam Commissioner, my congratulations. Your text goes in the right direction, that of more protection with regard to all critical infrastructure for Europe, particularly in the health and food sectors. The pandemic has shown how urgent it was to protect these sectors, so important, so vital for Europe - health, food, energy - against cyberattacks.
    I invite the Commission to go further. I think that as far as our independence - a form of sovereignty that can be found at the European level in such important sectors as energy, digital, food, health, and I would even add defense - we must go further to avoid any dependence in the future. This is sometimes created, for example, by taking the case of the decision made here and elsewhere to have 100% electric vehicles by 2035, which creates a form of dependence on China. We also see this when the same China takes over ports and airports in Europe. In relation to all these strategic sectors, all these strategic locations, the Commission must go further to protect Europeans, to protect our independence, our autonomy as much as possible."};"According to the speech, it is mentioned that there has been a decision made to have 100% electric vehicles by 2035, which creates a form of dependence on China. This is presented as an example of how Europe's independence can be compromised in strategic sectors. That's the only information related to electric vehicles mentioned in the text."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;
"2022-11-22_19-32";"Silvia Sardone";"ID";" – Madam President, esteemed colleagues, the European Union is increasingly subject to China. From 2035, in fact, there will be an obligation for electric cars, we will depend on China. The market for electric cars, from batteries to raw materials, rare earths, is essentially a monopoly of the Asian giant. We pass from dependence on Russian gas to that of China practically, to an additional dependence on the Asian giant. All this hiding behind the green, but China continues to pollute and its CO2 emissions represent a third of those of the whole world.
    But close your eyes even in front of the human rights violations imposed by the communist dictatorship of the Chinese government. Persecution of political opponents, ethnic and religious minorities. In short, we are tired of your submission to China."};"According to the speech, from 2035 onwards, there will be an obligation for electric cars in the European Union. This means that the EU will have to adopt electric vehicles as a standard or requirement. The speaker implies that this dependence on electric cars will make the EU reliant on China, specifically in terms of batteries and raw materials needed for these vehicles, which are essentially controlled by China."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;
"2022-12-12_16-17";"Stanislav Polčák";"EPP";" – Madam President, I will try to keep it to one minute. Sustainable mobility is undoubtedly one of the greatest challenges of the next decades. We are facing huge impacts from increasing traffic. People want to travel, they want accessible services, they travel for them and so do products and goods must flow. This represents truly enormous impacts and increases in emissions. Both environmental impacts and health impacts, as well as impacts on biodiversity, these are enormous. And it is also important to underline that finding sustainable transport solutions for the twenty-first century is a legislative and strategic challenge. For us, it is important to present legislation in this Parliament for which we will stand. I think that this is one of the most important tasks we have, to find sustainable transport solutions for the twenty-first century."};"There is no mention of electric vehicles in the provided speech. The speaker discusses ""sustainable mobility"" as one of the greatest challenges of the next decades, but does not specifically mention electric vehicles or any other type of vehicle. The focus is on the need for sustainable transport solutions and the importance of finding legislative and strategic answers to this challenge."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2022-12-14_3-8";"Jordan Bardella";"ID";"
    On behalf of the ID Group. - Madam President of the European Parliament, Madam President of the European Commission, Ladies and Gentlemen, Members of the Council, my dear colleagues, it is not good these days to be a European company. Not only do our companies suffer from the hellish rise in energy prices, for which you offer no lasting solution, but they now face American protectionism without any false modesty.
    As the European Council approaches, here is indeed a new cause of concern for our companies: the inflation reduction law decided by US President Joe Biden. Under the guise of fighting climate change, this law favors American companies with large subsidies and tax credits in areas such as photovoltaic panels, electric cars, or batteries.
    Shock among European elites, who still believed in the verses of the liberal religion and the breviary of the World Trade Organization! With arms akimbo, eyes wide open, it seems you have finally discovered that all the great powers of the world promote their companies, protect their workers, and defend their interests. All except the European Union, which claims to be the best pupil of free trade and systematically suffers for it.
    We are the only continent that opens its public markets so much without reciprocity, where Americans buy American and the Chinese buy Chinese. We are the only ones to open so widely our borders to products that do not respect any of our standards, whether social or environmental. Instead of being the eternal naïfs of world trade, what are we waiting for, Europeans, to buy European? What are we waiting for to protect the social norms derived from our democracies, avoiding competition with countries that care little about workers' rights? What are we waiting for to define and defend our interests strategically, to build an ambitious growth policy, and to protect our producers, consumers, and employees?
    Europeans did not create Europe to suffer but to act. Let us wake up! I thank you and wish you all, my dear colleagues, a very Merry Christmas."};"According to the speech, the ""inflation reduction law"" decided by US President Joe Biden favors American companies with large subsidies and tax credits in areas such as:

* Photovoltaic panels
* Electric cars
* Batteries

In other words, the law provides financial incentives for American companies that produce these products."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;
"2022-12-14_3-16";"Jaak Madison";"ID";" – Mr President, I wouldn’t say this very often, but I couldn’t agree more with Mr Verhofstadt, he was absolutely right that we need sanctions against Iran and we need to deliver more and more and in a faster way weapons to Ukraine to win the war. That’s the only solution for peace and we all want to have peace, definitely. 
Unfortunately, the President of the Commission has left – probably because this debate is too boring – but I was listening very carefully to her speech. She mentioned, of course, about the Green Deal, about climate change, that this will be like the main focus tomorrow in the meeting of the Council. I was thinking, when she said that we have to take care of the raw materials, that we can’t accept a situation where we are relying on one country, on China, to have raw materials, and we have to take care of this. 
And I was thinking, how? What would be the solution? Because, well, in fact most of the raw materials we’re relying on are in China and in Africa, and in Africa very many industries are owned by the Chinese. We need cobalt for the batteries to drive our nice electric cars in the cities of Europe to feel very green. At the same time, most of the reserves of cobalt are in Congo and most of the resources are owned by Chinese in Congo. So how are we going to have this cobalt to drive our nice cars to feel very green? And how are we going to solve this?  What’s the solution? Are we going to kick out those Chinese from Congo or are we just maybe like following the absolutely crazy ideology where we are only about 6% of the population in the world and we are trying to save the planet? It’s like the same thing, like the communist ideology in the Chinese in the sixties. I think there’s no big difference."};"According to the speech, the speaker mentions that we need cobalt for the batteries to drive our nice electric cars in the cities of Europe to feel very green. This implies that electric vehicles are being discussed as part of the Green Deal and climate change initiatives. The speaker is highlighting the issue of relying on China and Africa for raw materials, specifically cobalt, which is used in electric vehicle batteries."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;
"2023-01-17_3-2";"Ulf Kristersson";"NA";" President-in-Office of the Council. – Madam President, dear Roberta, Members of the European Parliament, Vice—Presidents of the Commission, ladies and gentlemen.
It is a privilege and a pleasure to be here today to present the priorities of Sweden’s third Presidency of the Council of the European Union.
In short – our chief priorities aim to help make Europe greener, safer and freer. Greener, safer and freer.
We have a lot to do together in the coming six months. Times are though difficult. War is raging in Europe, a war that has led to countless casualties – both soldiers and civilians – and to brutal atrocities. But also to an energy crisis and to an economic downturn.
All this will make the coming months very challenging, most of all, of course, for all our Ukrainian friends. While we respond firmly to these emergencies, we must also move the EU’s political and law—making agenda forward.
So far, the European response to Russia’s illegal invasion of Ukraine has been strong, united and decisive. In addition to nine sanction packages, we have recently increased our common support to Ukraine with a further EUR 18 billion in macro—financial assistance. Many individual countries provide Ukraine with important military equipment as well. And Ukraine and Moldova are now both candidate countries.
Moreover, the Union is on the road to reducing our dependence on Russian fossil fuels. In the 1970s, getting rid of fossils was mainly an economic matter. In the 80s and the 90s, it increasingly became a matter of fighting climate change. And now it has finally also become, obviously, a matter of geopolitics and security.
Over the last few years, we have shown that in times of crisis, the EU really can come together and exercise international influence without losing sight of our long—term agenda. Vladimir Putin’s regime underestimated not only Ukraine, but also the European Union.
As the new Presidency of the Council, we aim to build on the excellent work of the French and the Czech Presidencies. We intend to continue in the same spirit when we try to seek solutions in the Council and, of course, with the Parliament and the Commission.
Our obvious starting point – everybody’s first priority – is and has to be Ukraine. Nothing is as important. But this is not simply crisis management – this is about fighting for democracy and fighting for decency. Ukrainian victory is existential for Europe – and, honestly, existential for the whole world.
Personally, I woke up in Helsinki on 24 February last year at 4am to the news that Ukraine had been invaded by Russia. That was only a few hours after a conversation with the Finnish President Sauli Niinistö. We both, during that conversation, saw the obvious risk of war, but we also saw the risk of divisions between friends – European friends and division transatlantically. However, when the war came, and it did, the Western democracies stayed united. Today the transatlantic unity on Ukraine is stronger than ever.
It is a horrific war, which has displaced a third of Ukraine’s population and destroyed half of the country’s energy infrastructure. Many Ukrainians, both soldiers and civilians, have paid the ultimate price for this war. Bucha has become part of our collective European memory.
But history was also made when President Zelenskyy refused to leave Kyiv and remained in Ukraine with his government. In doing so, he has embodied the country’s resistance. On the battlefield, but also in the battle for hearts and minds, Ukraine has offered hope for all of us who believe that the rule of people always trumps the rule of a strongman.
While Ukraine’s resistance continues, we must now do what we can to make sure that Ukraine prevails and that its future lies here in the EU. Because if the hope for democracy’s future is in Ukraine, Ukraine’s hope lies with us. Our task is to continue supporting the Ukrainians who are not only fighting for their independence, but also for a European way of life where right is greater than might.
Our role as President of the Council means we have to ensure the EU’s continued economic, political, humanitarian and military support to Ukraine. For example, we will have to monitor the progress of Ukraine’s reforms on its path towards EU membership. This also means that we have to start working on solutions for Ukraine’s recovery and reconstruction, together with all our international partners.
Reconstructing Ukraine after the war will remind us all of the Marshall Plan after World War 2. And in this effort, frozen Russian assets need not only to be part of the problem, but also become a part of the solution. I foresee a very thorough analysis on the extent to which the democratic world can unite in reusing that money to repair some of the destruction.
So, our first priority as President of the Council will be to work – together with the European Parliament – to promote Europe’s security by supporting Ukraine and highlight the EU’s geopolitical significance in an increasingly uncertain world.
And when we build security, we must also look at other aspects that are close to other citizens. Free movement in the EU should not mean free movement of criminal activities, obviously – there is much room for stepping up our cooperation against organised crime. We must also continue our work towards a common and coherent migration policy, while at the same time managing the current situation with all tools already available to us.
In times like these, the EU’s role in providing security and stability across all these dimensions is crucial.
Another area where the EU has a crucial role to play is in the green transition, a task that has only become more urgent in light of the war in Ukraine. The plan to reduce emissions by 55% by 2030 is vital to reach CO2 neutrality by 2050 and live up to the goals set out in the Paris Agreement.
In Sweden, we are proud of our own contributions to Europe’s shift from fossil—dependent to fossil—free. On the recent trips to Sweden, we chose to show both the Conference of Presidents and the Commission how companies such as the battery maker Northvolt or the car manufacturer Volvo are creating new, innovative ways to reduce Europe’s dependence on fossil fuels.
These businesses, they want to go to work. They want to benefit from the great opportunities of the green transition and they are asking us in politics – domestically and European – to provide frameworks for their work.
And that is precisely what the EU has been doing – for example through the decision to prohibit the sale of new fossil—fuelled cars by 2035. Going forward, we must continue down this path.
The Swedish Presidency intends to do its part to strengthen the EU as a frontrunner in the green transition. We will continue the important ongoing work of the institutions and make a conclusion of Fit for 55 our priority. We count on the European Parliament and we look forward to work together on this.
We also look forward to beginning the work of reforming the European electricity market design, since energy from the right sources and the right price is the foundation of the green transition.
Third, the green transition touches on our long—term competitiveness. If European companies are to produce the energy and make the batteries, the electric cars and the fossil—free steel of the future, they all need good conditions to compete internationally.
From the very beginning, the integration of our economies lay at the heart of the European project. By removing tariffs, red tape and other barriers, we have replaced power politics with a rules—based market and turned war between our own nations into things of the past.
For the past three decades, the single market has fostered healthy competition and built strong economies and industries across our continent. Removing barriers for goods, services, capital and people have made our companies better, our countries more prosperous, and provided consumers with higher quality and better-priced products.
The size and the strength of our economies is also a significant reason why the EU is such a powerful actor nowadays on the world stage. Thanks to the single market and thanks to a successful trade policy based on openness, with agreements and partnerships around the world, the EU is an economic giant.
Despite this, as a Union we are not living up to our full economic potential. Our productivity is lagging behind, and fewer and fewer of the biggest firms on the planet are EU—based. Today, we are spending significantly less on research and development than the US and China, and high energy prices may drive investments away from Europe.
In other words, we are struggling with several challenges related to the crises that we are going through, while facing actions of partners and competitors around the globe such as the US Inflation Reduction Act. The EU’s response to these developments needs to be analysed and discussed as a matter of priority.
But we must not forget that long—term competitiveness must be built on strong companies that are able to survive and thrive in competition on an open market. In the long term, factors like weak productivity, insufficient spending on R&D, and high electricity prices pose greater risks to European competitiveness than lack of subsidies to production in Europe.
If we want to maintain our leading, knowledge—based economies with innovative industries, we need to step up our game. Therefore, we need a long—term new strategy on EU level to boost competitiveness and productivity. The single market’s 30th anniversary is a very useful starting point for that work.
Last but not least, the fourth priority of the Swedish Presidency will be to uphold the Union’s common, fundamental values. I would like to pay tribute to the European Parliament for your steadfast support for the most important principle that binds us all together – respect for the rule of law.
History teaches us that this is a precondition for our political, our legal and our economic cooperation. If we want citizens’ rights to be protected everywhere across the Union and the single market to function properly, the rule of law has to be upheld in every country.
Liberal democracy – the combination of popular sovereignty and individual rights – is also what separates the EU from other international institutions and makes more people in more countries want to join. These values, not corruption and cronyism are what Ukraine, Moldova and other candidate countries are aspiring towards. In that sense, making sure that we preserve the rule of law in the EU is also a way of enhancing our global competitiveness and our attractiveness.
There are certainly formats and forums to engage with authoritarian states, but the EU is not one of them. This is and must remain a club of democracies.
In the last few years, we have made significant progress to safeguard the rule of law in the EU. The conditionality mechanism has been an important new instrument to ensure that EU funds are not misused. Article 7 proceedings have been initiated. And the rule of law dialogues have shown that all Member States, not just a few, have room for improvement as far as the rule of law is concerned.
During the Swedish Presidency, this work will certainly continue. And in order to emphasise the importance of the rule of law, we will also organise a symposium on this specific issue in Stockholm in May.
When my Czech colleague Petr Fiala spoke to this Parliament in July last year, he paraphrased Ronald Reagan in saying that democracy is never more than one generation away from its demise. And I agree. If the last few years have taught us anything, it should be that no political institution can settle with past achievements. Democracy has to be defended and reinvented in both word and deed.
Dear Members of the European Parliament, six months is a very short time. Yet, there is so much to do, since these months coincide with a truly unique moment in Europe’s contemporary history.
For obvious reasons, the only thing I can promise you all in this room, is that we will do our utmost – there is only so much that my government can control, and some things will no doubt catch us by surprise, they always tend to do.
But I can assure you that Sweden will be a constructive and enthusiastic leader of the work in the Council and a cooperative partner that will search for compromises with all Member States – and all EU institutions – in mind.
Together, we will seek solutions to meet the challenges that I have outlined here today – to security, to climate, to competitiveness, to the rule of law and more. And we will count on you, not just as a counterpart but also as an ally.
Thank you all for your attention. I now look forward to the debate."};"The text mentions electric vehicles in the following context:

""...companies such as the battery maker Northvolt or the car manufacturer Volvo are creating new, innovative ways to reduce Europe's dependence on fossil fuels...""

""...the decision to prohibit the sale of new fossil-fuelled cars by 2035...""

""...European companies are to produce the energy and make the batteries, the electric cars and the fossil-free steel of the future...""

These sentences indicate that Northvolt is a company involved in battery production, Volvo is a car manufacturer, and the EU has set a goal to prohibit the sale of new fossil-fuelled cars by 2035. The text also mentions the importance of producing energy, batteries, electric cars, and fossil-free steel for the future.

In summary, the text highlights the role of companies like Northvolt and Volvo in reducing Europe's dependence on fossil fuels, and the EU's goal to promote the development of electric vehicles through its decision to prohibit the sale of new fossil-fuelled cars by 2035."};0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2023-01-17_3-5";"Iratxe García Pérez";"S&D";"
    On behalf of the S&D Group. - Madam President, welcome to Parliament, Mr. Kristersson. The start of the Swedish Presidency takes place at a time when the European Union is going through its most important impulse in recent decades. No one could have imagined the leap in the integration process with solutions that have been up to the challenge of the serious crises that have occurred.
    If 2022 goes down in history as the year that brought unprecedented decisions to combat price wars, 2023 must be the year of structural solutions, it has to be the year of structural solutions. The main challenge of this new year is social discontent. If inflation continues to erode purchasing power, it will be necessary to enable a permanent financial instrument to protect businesses and families most vulnerable.
    In response to the discriminatory subsidies of the United States, we must propose a temporary modification of state aid in order to guarantee the rapid deployment of investments in the recovery plan and avoid breaking the single market to the detriment of partners with lower fiscal capacity.
    Despite high inflation directly harming the population, the Swedish Presidency program does not contain a single commitment related to the social pillar. A serious mistake, Mr. Kristersson, because the goals of the Gothenburg summit in 2017 are the only beacon that can guide us towards a Social Europe, strong, fair and with opportunities.
    The 2008 debt crisis, for which austerity was a failed solution, is a clear example. Now, the energy crisis will be the end of the marginalist system. The current electricity market, where renewables represent 50% of electricity production, is not a model for the future. It's time to adopt an integral reform of the electricity market to limit the impact of gas on the light bill.
    Mr. Prime Minister, sincerely commit before the European Parliament that the Swedish Presidency will continue to lead the fight against climate change. It is true that in his speech he clearly stated this commitment for a greener Europe, but it is also true that his government has eliminated subsidies for electric vehicles, limited objectives for reducing biofuels and, moreover, his far-right ally in this Chamber votes constantly against the Directives of the ""55 Target"" package.
    History does not have a single direction, Mr. Kristersson. It is not time to be dragged by the extreme right to walk against science. Climate change and Putin's war demand betting clearly and decisively on renewable energies because the longed-for strategic autonomy will only be a reality when the Twenty-Seven free themselves from the heavy burden of fossil fuels.
    Defending common achievements requires firmness in the face of the constant antagonism of Hungary and Poland. We trust that you will keep your word to accelerate the procedures provided for in Article 7 to stop their autocratic drift.
    You represent a modern, progressive, and traditionally avant-garde country in terms of human rights, but the program of your presidency does not contain even a single reference to women or migrants. What is your proposal so that half of our Union's population, women, continue to conquer the rights that guarantee equal opportunities? In gender equality matters, we will not give an inch back. The directives on gender violence and salary transparency must be a reality in 2023 and your presidency has a lot of work to do in this area.  The future of our Union also depends on migrants having a response to the situation we are experiencing at this time. It is a moral imperative that we do not live through the shame of fights between prime ministers over rescuing human beings from a certain death as required by maritime law. Only the definitive conclusion of the New Migration and Asylum Pact will prevent the outbursts of radical leaders who condition our migration policy.
    Mr. Kristersson, history teaches us that the fertilizer of the far right usually has its origin in emotions and false solutions. Instrumentalizing social unrest is their resource, and we have the obligation, all democrats, to neutralize this situation. I extend my hand, the hand of the Social Democratic family, so that together we strengthen the resurgence of Europeanism and continue guaranteeing unprecedented solutions to citizens' problems, today more aware than ever that only unity makes strength."};"According to the speech, the Swedish government has eliminated subsidies for electric vehicles. This is mentioned as one of the criticisms leveled against the Prime Minister Kristersson's government, along with limiting objectives for reducing biofuels. The speaker argues that this decision goes against the commitment to a greener Europe and the fight against climate change."};0;0;1;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;
"2023-01-17_3-12";"Ulf Kristersson";"NA";"
    The Council's acting President - Madam Speaker! I thank you for the congratulations. I also thank you for the kind and critical questions, and I thank you for the greeting to draw inspiration from digital Spotify and analogue IKEA. They are seen by me as two good role models when Swedes try to do something in the world outside.
    It is, as Manfred Weber mentioned, our third presidency: 2001 and 2009. Different times, different questions and different treaties - very different conditions, but I can assure Parliament that I draw good inspiration both from these two presidencies and from the Prime Ministers who led Sweden at that time.
    I would like to start with Sweden's relationship with the European Union. Sweden had a rather skeptical view of the EU - let's be honest about it. From the 1960s onwards, EU membership was seen as incompatible with Swedish neutrality. For many, this is difficult to understand: EU membership was seen as being in conflict with Swedish neutrality. Parties on my side were strongly in favor of joining the EU. On the other side, they were very hesitant. After that, we had a referendum that gave a clear answer that Sweden should join the EU. Since then, the basic consensus about Sweden's role in the EU has become increasingly strong. Now eight out of eight parties in the Swedish Riksdag are in favor of the Swedish EU membership: eight out of eight! Longer it was five out of eight. One on my side and two on the other side were against. Now they all are. I attach great importance to the prerequisites for good cooperation in Sweden, for Europe.
    That does not mean that everyone thinks the same. It does not mean that all parties have the same opinion about exactly what should be common European issues, let alone how to solve the common European issues. That is what democracy is about, both at home and in this chamber. I have great respect for it.
    Someone also mentioned security policy. Six out of eight parties support the Swedish NATO application together with Finland. Only the Left Party and the Green Party are against Sweden changing its security policy course. It is also a great strength when we are now on our way into NATO cooperation.
    To mention something about domestic policy, there are four parties that have agreed to solve really big problems in Sweden, agreed on a paradigm shift in Swedish politics in several areas that require resolute action. We talk about stopping organized serious crime as you have also read about: a shooting every day, several explosions per week. No other country in the EU has had such development as Sweden.
    It is about reducing immigration to Sweden so that we have a chance to cope with the integration of thousands of people who have come to our country, and so that we can remain an open, equal country where many people get equal good chances.
    It is about restructuring the entire energy policy so that we can cope with climate change, with electrification based on renewable electricity - a massive investment in building new Swedish nuclear power together with other European countries that also go this way, so that we can become completely fossil-free in time.
    All of this we have agreed to change course in, in Swedish politics. This is domestic policy, but since it was mentioned here in the chamber, I want to mention it for you as well.
    The government that Sweden now has formed is a completely normal Nordic government since 2001 - it has been tested in Finland, in Norway, in Denmark with good results. At the same time, Norden is one of the world's most open, most tolerant and free parts of the world - some of the world's most stable democracies. I feel very safe with the government I have formed in Sweden. 
    The internal market celebrates its 30th anniversary. It's great, but as some have mentioned, there is much more to do, such as the digital internal market and the internal market for services. There is still a lot to be done, not least for all those countries that today have a service economy as their mainstay.
    
    The American initiative on IRA contains both threats and opportunities. First, let's say that it's good that the USA is back in climate action. Let's fully appreciate it. It would be much worse if the USA were not there. In essence, nothing global climate action can work without the USA, and eventually also India and China being part of it. That the EU has become the world's leading ""climate hub"" is a good start. The fact that the USA is now acting on what China has done for many years is also understandable, but it also risks affecting European businesses in a way we don't think is good. Let us now analyze the consequences of the American initiative and the consequences of various action alternatives. Let us also have an eye on both the short term and act wisely in response to the USA and on the long term, and not do things in the short term that can be harmful to Europe's economy in the long run.
    
    We have a number of acute migration issues. I have naturally spoken with Belgium, the Netherlands, and Austria recently. Let us acknowledge that it is an acute situation. We have seen an increase in irregular migration streams by 70% in 2022. I have great respect for the fact that something must be done. At the same time, we have long-term migration issues that will continue to be worked on as planned since earlier times. In the short term, it's about external border issues, relations with third countries and return, but much more needs to be done.
    
    The social pillar was mentioned. It is no secret that Sweden at its core is very satisfied with the form of wage formation we have in Sweden and has no plans to abandon the functioning model. In essence, the EU has significantly more common issues to engage in, both short and long term, than to take over responsibility for national concerns within social and welfare policy.
    
    On the energy side: We will see a 50% increase in wind energy in Sweden in the coming years. There is a strong increase in nuclear power in Sweden in the coming decades. The best-selling car in Sweden last year was an electric car. What we now have to do is supply these cars with clean electricity at a reasonable price and in an infrastructure so that it is available for everyone.
    
    I thank all those present. I thank all the questions. I will gladly return."};"In the speech, the speaker mentions electric vehicles (EVs) once:

""The best-selling car in Sweden last year was an electric car.""

This sentence indicates that electric cars have become popular in Sweden, with one brand being the top seller in 2022. The speaker does not provide further information about EVs, such as their impact on climate change or energy policy, but rather uses this fact to illustrate a point about the growth of wind and nuclear power in Sweden's energy sector."};0;0;0;0;1;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2023-01-17_3-66";"Maroš Šefčovič";"NA";" Vice-President of the Commission. – Madam President, dear Prime Minister, honourable Members of the European Parliament, first and foremost, I would like to thank you all for the debate which highlighted the major challenges we have to tackle and face together.
First and foremost, support for Ukraine. We will be working together on continuous financial support and, as you are probably informed, first disbursement of EUR 3 billion to our Ukrainian friends was just made this morning. I’m sure that the Swedish Presidency, in close cooperation with the Commission and the European Parliament, will explore all other possibilities how to assist the brave Ukrainians to defend their country: from military aid, through support for Ukrainian strategic infrastructure, down to reconstruction and preparation for Ukraine’s integration into the European Union.
Second, a huge challenge, which was rightly highlighted by many honourable Members, is competitiveness. We very much appreciate the fact that the Swedish Presidency put this so high on the agenda for this semester. Competitive Europe means economically and politically strong Europe. Strong Europe, which is able to play its role as a global actor, to help others, to defend the weaker, but also to guarantee the strong social policies Europe is so known for.
In our visit to Kiruna, we heard from companies like Northvolt, who became a multi—billion high—tech battery company in just a few years. We have heard from the companies who know how to do green mining, carbon—free steel, how they can focus creatively on the critical raw materials we need so much in Europe and how to push us to the next level in the electromobility.
Your companies, Mr Prime Minister, are proving that you can be globally competitive and at the same time highly sustainable. And I think as Mr Azmani has underscored, now we need to make sure that we spread these examples across Europe, that we will be working with all of you to make sure that we will push over the finishing line with the Chips Act, and as we start to work on the Critical Raw Materials Act, that we will be putting down the rules on responsible mining, that we will be working on pushing energy prices down and energy security in Europe up, because this is exactly what we need to help our businesses, our households, and to consolidate our single market.
President of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen just presented her ideas to develop and work on the Net—Zero Industry Act, where we want to look into the possibilities, how to make the decision—making if it comes to the IPSE, the important projects from the common European interest faster, where we would also be having also more experienced assessment of the state aid. And we are going to do all that to improve the competitiveness of European companies, but also to counter relocation risks of these companies which are now in a difficult situation.
To get to there, we are also preparing to work on the European Sovereignty Fund, and we are doing all this to send a very clear message to the European industry. We are going to fight for you to stay and prosper in Europe.
Mr Prime Minister, if I look at the number of the trilogues your presidency will be facing, I think that we can already now describe your presidency as a very important negotiation presidency. And I just would like to highlight that we will be working very closely with you to make sure that you will have the utmost success in achieving the conclusions of these negotiations, because it would allow us to push all these legislative proposals, especially in the field of the green deal, over the finishing line and make Europe more dynamic and more competitive.
If you allow me, Madam President, to continue and conclude on a very important point for which Sweden is traditionally known and is a strong supporter, I am talking about the free trade. There are very high ambitions in this regard. We need to make most of the trade agreements, for example, we have with Canada, but also with the UK, with which we are trying hard to sort our differences. But we are also working very hard to conclude agreements with Mexico, Chile, New Zealand, Australia and would like to work closely with the Swedish Presidency to achieve progress with India and Indonesia. And we also believe that we need to restart a conversation about Mercosur agreement.
And we will do all that together with making sure that we would find proper answers to reduce the negative side effects of Inflation Reduction Act and to face unfair competition, which is very often coming from Chinese massive subsidies.
Madam President, one of the issues which was highlighted by many speakers was the issue of migration. Here we in the European Commission are convinced that with the political will and the hard work we can finalise migration and asylum pact. We need it now, but for sure, we will need it in the future.
So, Madam President, honourable Members, dear Prime Minister and the colleagues from the Swedish Presidency, I think it is quite clear that you are taking the helm of the European Union at a very special, crucial time, and I am sure that thanks to our close cooperation, thanks to traditional Swedish efficiency, innovative approach, can—do spirit and your ambitious agenda, your presidency will be a success, not only for you, but for the whole of Europe."};"In the speech, there is a mention related to electric vehicles. The Vice-President of the Commission mentions that during their visit to Kiruna, they heard from companies like Northvolt, which has become a multi-billion high-tech battery company in just a few years. They also highlight how these companies are able to focus creatively on critical raw materials needed for electromobility.

This is mentioned as an example of Swedish companies being globally competitive and sustainable at the same time. The Vice-President emphasizes that it's essential to spread these examples across Europe, which will be achieved by working together with all stakeholders to push over the finishing line with the Chips Act and Critical Raw Materials Act.

In summary, the text mentions Northvolt as a company that has successfully developed high-tech batteries for electric vehicles, highlighting their innovative approach and competitiveness. The Vice-President sees this as an example of how European companies can be both globally competitive and sustainable, and emphasizes the need to spread these examples across Europe through legislative proposals like the Chips Act and Critical Raw Materials Act."};0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;1;0;1;0;0;0;0;
"2023-01-18_9-3";"Thierry Breton";"NA";"
    Member of the Commission. - Madam President, Ladies and Gentlemen deputies, Madam Minister, firstly, I would like to thank the European Parliament for having placed this very important issue on the agenda this morning. Of course, we know the context. We know it too well because, in addition to the energy crisis whose impact is at home, in Europe, much more significant than in the rest of the world, Europe faces the efforts of third countries who, let's not be afraid to say, are trying to attract our industrial capacities.
    The American law on inflation reduction, called IRA, is, of course, at the center of all concerns since now several months. But let's not be mistaken, China also encourages companies with high energy intensity to relocate all or part of their production by promising them access to cheap electricity and a more lenient regulatory environment than in Europe. As a result, the risk of relocation of companies is very present, you all know that. The investments needed to build a European base of tomorrow's clean technology industries are being redirected outside the European Union. In any case, this does not only concern large groups but also affects the entire supply chain and, in an equally worrying way, our SMEs.
    Europe therefore needs to take its destiny into its own hands, as I have heard you say several times since I became Commissioner. Firstly, it is a matter of giving a strong signal very quickly to companies. Europe means business - Europe, that means business, and the future of industry will be made on our continent. That's our political message. Because Europe is at the forefront of innovation. We have qualified workforce and also state-of-the-art infrastructures.
    Secondly, it is a matter of accelerating the development of the manufacturing base necessary for our green transition. Because without a solid manufacturing base, the supply security, export capacity and job creation in Europe are at risk. We see a trend of being relegated to the status of net importers of electric vehicles or solar panels. But we cannot resign ourselves to replacing our dependence on fossil fuels with new dependencies, industrial, technological or in terms of land rare supplies, for example.
    Thirdly, it is a matter of putting in place sustainable solutions that work for all the countries of the European Union. Because faced with this new structural reality, the framework we set up must not, of course, benefit only a few large countries of the European Union. We need solutions that preserve the integrity of the internal market and guarantee fair competition conditions.
    Ladies and Gentlemen deputies, to successfully complete our digital transition, we have set ourselves the objective of increasing the Union's share of the global market in the manufacture of semi-conductors to 20% by 2030. And to translate this ambition into reality, we have clearly proposed, as you know, the famous ""Chip Act"", the regulation on semi-conductors, which will allow us to build a resilient supply chain in the field of semi-conductors. Well, let's do the same for the green transition. 
    We have the ambition to be the first carbon-neutral continent by 2050. This is a beautiful and strong ambition. It's our ambition. So let's make sure it happens through a strong European industrial base in the fields of green technologies, the so-called cleantech. And this is indeed an act for cleantech, like the famous ""Chip Act"", which we must present today. The ""Net-Zero Industry Act"", the law on zero-emission industries, announced by President von der Leyen, will therefore set clear regulatory objectives for a manufacturing base of green technologies, the cleantech, by 2030. For example, for battery production, solar panel production, electrolyzer production, wind turbine production, and all related value chains that support the production of essential elements for our transition.
    
    Concretely, we will create conditions conducive to the manufacture of green technologies in Europe, first through reduced administrative burden and accelerated permit granting procedures. Then, through changes and accelerations of state aid rules, including offering equivalent aid intensity to that of third countries, to support clean technology factories and involving all cleantech actors. Finally, through support for European demand solutions through our public procurement.
    
    The ""Net-Zero Industry Act"" will also be the political and legislative vehicle to ensure transparency and European coordination rather than relying on national solutions. We will also need a European financing pillar where simplification and speed will be key elements. And in anticipation of the Sovereign Fund, which will be discussed within the mid-term review of the Union's financial perspectives, we do indeed need short-term financing solutions so that each Member State has the capacity to support its industrial base. In this regard, we are evaluating needs and stabilizing a coherent basket of instruments to respond to the different needs of Member States, the only way to ensure fair competition conditions.
    
    All this, of course, requires a more assertive trade policy and, let's not be afraid to say, less naive. The regulation on foreign subsidies, which will enter into force this summer, will play a key role in this regard and reminds us that public procurement has become an absolutely major economic and geostrategic lever.
    
    Finally, I would like to conclude with a few words on the absolutely essential role of SMEs in European competitiveness. Our 25 million European SMEs, which employ nearly 100 million people, clearly form the backbone of our economy. And yet they are vulnerable. That is why the Commission is preparing an aid package for SMEs in 2023. The revision of the late payment directive will also be a key element of this package. But our SMEs need much more than that. For 55% of them, administrative burden is their number one concern. And despite our collective efforts to exempt SMEs or treat them more lightly in our legislation, this burden continues to grow. I will work with my colleagues from the College to ensure that any new initiative planned this year is preceded by a complete test for SMEs. And I count on you, as co-legislators, to support me in this commitment and to wave the flag for SMEs in all policy areas.
    
    Ladies and Gentlemen deputies, we need a comprehensive response and I know I can count on you."};"The speech mentions electric vehicles in the following context:

""We see a trend of being relegated to the status of net importers of electric vehicles or solar panels.""

This sentence suggests that Europe is at risk of becoming dependent on importing electric vehicles and other green technologies, rather than producing them domestically. The speaker emphasizes the importance of building a strong European industrial base in the fields of green technologies, including battery production, solar panel production, electrolyzer production, wind turbine production, and related value chains, to support the transition to a carbon-neutral continent by 2050.

In other words, the speech highlights the need for Europe to develop its own manufacturing capabilities in electric vehicles and other clean technologies, rather than relying on imports from third countries."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;
"2023-01-18_17-3";"Kris Peeters";"NA";" Vice-President of the EIB. – Madam President, dear Members of Parliament, ladies and gentlemen, it is a pleasure to be here with you today. First of all, I would like to thank the rapporteur, Angelika Winzig, for the excellent work, the good cooperation and the relevance of the report. It is always strange to talk about activities looking back, as the report analyses the year 2021. So much has happened since then, but the EIB performed well, being instrumental in the EU response to multiple crises, without losing sight of our core missions. 
There is a common thread between past and current crises, which is investment. Crises always put investment at risk, whether it is private or public money. This is the reason why institutions like the EIB play a key role in providing stabilising effects and sending signals to the market. 
When you talk about financial performance, as rightly acknowledged in the report, the EIB Group is an effective instrument in support of EU policies. For the second year in a row, the EIB focused on fighting the COVID-19 crisis, while increasing its financing for green projects. The EIB Group worked with partners in Europe and globally to deliver a record EUR 95 billion in financing – a 23% increase from 2020. 
Ladies and gentlemen, dear colleagues, almost half of the Group’s financing – EUR 45 billion – went to small and medium-sized enterprises hit hard by the pandemic. The European Investment Fund, as part of the EIB Group, has played an instrumental role in that respect. As the report mentions, our financial support in 2021 to small and medium-sized enterprises sustained 4.5 million jobs. 
Now to say something about the fight against COVID-19 and the crises. Think of the pandemic, the war in Ukraine or the urgent need to mitigate climate change: we have moved towards permanent crisis management. Since the COVID-19 pandemic began, the EIB Group has approved almost EUR 72 billion in targeted support for the public health sector, delivery of vaccines and for businesses hit by the crisis. Thank you for acknowledging this in the report. 
On Ukraine, ladies and gentlemen, the Bank acted swiftly in supporting the country with its immediate finance needs. The EIB quickly reallocated and distributed over EUR 1.7 billion to support the most urgent reconstruction needs, with the support and the guarantee from the European budget, of course. The EIB’s engagement complements EU budget financing under the macro-financial assistance instrument and the new MFA+. 
Ladies and gentlemen, the war also underlined the importance of a sound European security and defence policy. I am happy with last year’s adoption of the Strategic European Security Initiative, SESI, which aims to mobilise investment in support of Europe’s dual-use security and defence systems by backing Europe’s technology industry and civilian security infrastructure.
Until 2027, we have the ambition to finance about EUR 1 billion a year in dual-use projects, and I am glad, dear colleagues, to announce today that in the first year, 2022, we have by far exceeded this ambition and signed a total of EUR 1.5 billion for projects that qualify under SESI, the Strategic European Security Initiative. 
Let me say something about the green transitions. Crises do not distract us from our core responsibilities. The EIB has a key role to play in supporting and managing transitions. Together with the European Commission, we have been looking at how to make a lasting contribution to cope with the EU’s energy crisis. Currently, the EIB Group is stepping up its efforts in supporting REPowerEU. Last October, our Board endorsed an additional EUR 30 billion in loans and equity financing over the next five years. 
We will increase our support to renewables, energy efficiency, grids and storage, electric-vehicle charging infrastructure and breakthrough technologies, such as low-carbon hydrogen. This approach is in line with our ambitions and achievements as the EU climate bank. In 2021, 51% of EIB investments went to climate action and environmental sustainable projects. Another important step in line with our Climate Bank Roadmap is the adoption of our revised Transport Lending Policy last year to ensure that the Bank’s activities in the transport sector support EU policies. 
To underpin a resilient transition, more support is also needed in research and development – as already mentioned by the rapporteur – carried out by European companies, notably at the crucial intersection between digital and technology. That is why the EIB provides financing to cutting-edge technology firms, with facilities ranging from standard senior debt to the very popular non-dilutive venture debt specifically for start-ups. It is our ability to innovate within the EU that will help us to strengthen our strategic autonomy. 
But resilience has to go hand-in-hand with inclusiveness. Climate action and just transition are complimentary goals. Cohesion – as mentioned also by the rapporteur – will therefore remain part of our DNA. By 2025, the EIB will aim to commit 45% of its total financing in the European Union to support projects in transition and less developed regions. 
Finally, transparency and accountability. I am very much aware that accountability and integrity, and our related policies and practices, are also important to you, ladies and gentlemen, as much as they are to us. I fully agree with you that we cannot become complacent in that respect, and we take your recommendations very seriously. At the Bank we are committed to raising the bar.
On transparency, I am happy to see that the report welcomes our revised policy, which lays down provisions for the proactive publication of information and documents, as well as possible disclosure. Furthermore, we are constantly improving our policies and practices in various fields, notably related to the wellbeing of our staff, gender and diversity, anti-corruption safeguards, protection of whistleblowers, and so on. We also revised and adopted our Environmental and Social Sustainability Framework as well as our whistleblowing policy in 2021, which also grants protection to these persons. 
Last but not least, outside the EU. Finally, let me say some words about our operations outside the EU, which typically represent about 10% of our activities. It is increasingly important for the EU to be able to offer financial support in building partnerships with emerging and developing economies around the world and in promoting policy goals and initiatives of the EU.
Therefore, ladies and gentlemen, we created EIB Global, which officially started its operations in January 2022. EIB Global is a flexible and agile Team Europe partner that contributes to effective EU external action in response to crises, as well as long-term sustainable solutions. In the years ahead, we expect to deliver financing of around EUR 10 billion annually outside the EU. I thank once again the rapporteur. I thank you for your attention and I am looking forward to listening to the reactions."};"The text mentions electric vehicles (EVs) in the context of the European Investment Bank's (EIB) support for green projects. Specifically, it states that:

* The EIB Group has increased its financing for green projects, including electric-vehicle charging infrastructure.
* As part of its efforts to support the EU's energy crisis, the EIB Group is stepping up its efforts in supporting REPowerEU, which includes increasing its support to renewables, energy efficiency, grids and storage, electric-vehicle charging infrastructure, and breakthrough technologies such as low-carbon hydrogen.

In summary, the text mentions that the EIB is providing financing for electric-vehicle charging infrastructure as part of its broader efforts to support green projects and address the EU's energy crisis."};0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2023-02-14_3-2";"Jan Huitema";"NA";"
    Rapporteur. - Mr. President, Commissioner, esteemed members. For me, it was a great honor to lead these negotiations on behalf of the European Parliament. This regulation is the very first one from the ""Fit for 55"" package where the European Parliament has reached an agreement with the Member States and the European Commission. The negotiations ended on October 27, 2022, and in the meantime, the Council of Ministers has also approved the deal.
    For the European Parliament, several things were of great importance and I believe these are clearly included in the outcome of the trialogue. For the European Parliament, it is important to achieve the climate goals of Paris and the objectives of the European Green Deal. Road transport still emits a significant amount of CO2, which continues to rise. Therefore, the European Parliament insists on the goal of only allowing new cars on the European market from 2035 that do not emit CO2. Think, for example, of electrically powered cars on batteries and hydrogen cars.
    In addition to climate protection, the European Parliament attaches great importance to consumers and workers in the automotive sector. Many people need a car after all. Fossil fuels are becoming more expensive due to dependence on third countries and are being taxed more. In addition, consumers will have to pay a levy for the CO2 their cars emit. A climate-friendly and affordable alternative is therefore of great importance. Now, the operating and maintenance costs of, for example, an electric car are lower than those for the internal combustion engine variant. With this legislation, investments and development will focus on further developing emission-free cars. The prediction is that the purchase price of these cars will fall and that a second-hand and third-hand market will emerge more quickly.
    Each year, the European Commission must submit a progress report that clearly shows how the transition in the automotive sector is taking shape. Where necessary, the EU will have to invest in, for example, retraining and training of workers, necessary charging infrastructure, and last but not least, the availability of critical raw materials needed for this transition.
    All in all, this new legislation will give a boost to the shift that has already been initiated by the market. It will help consumers to be able to continue driving at an affordable price. It gives workers new opportunities and provides manufacturers with investment security. It is an important climate measure and will make us less dependent on fossil fuels from third countries."};"According to the speech, electric vehicles are mentioned as one of the alternatives to internal combustion engine cars that will be allowed on the European market from 2035 onwards. The speaker states that ""electrically powered cars on batteries"" will be an option for new car purchases.

Additionally, it is mentioned that the operating and maintenance costs of electric cars are lower than those of internal combustion engine cars, which could make them a more affordable alternative for consumers. The speaker also predicts that the purchase price of emission-free cars (including electric vehicles) will fall over time, and that a second-hand and third-hand market for these cars will emerge more quickly.

Overall, the speech presents electric vehicles as a key part of the European Union's efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from road transport and promote sustainable mobility."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2023-02-14_3-3";"Frans Timmermans";"NA";" Executive Vice President of the Commission. - Chairman, let me begin by expressing my warmest congratulations to Jan Huitema and his shadow rapporteurs. On behalf of Parliament, they have negotiated a text that strikes a fantastic balance between the interests of industry, climate interests, and above all the interests of workers. That is excellent work, and for that I offer my compliments.
    There isn't much more I can add to what Jan just said. These are the arguments in favor of this legislation. I just want to put a little emphasis on a few issues.
    First of all, as was already mentioned, we want people to have access to affordable and clean mobility. And for that, you need to bring electric mobility, especially for passenger cars, up to scale as quickly as possible. So you have to be very, very clear about the choices you made.
    By the way, I think the European car industry has made that choice very clearly already, and they've gone a long way in the last three or four years in understanding where the global car industry is heading. Yes, the running costs of electric vehicles are already lower than those of combustion engine cars, and within a few years, buying an electric vehicle will also be cheaper than buying a combustion-engine car. Then you will help consumers make that choice much easier. So I think that is a very important argument in favor of this legislation.
    The second argument, which I want to pay a little attention to because sometimes it's overlooked. Look at what our competitors are doing globally. We are very proud of the fact that the European car industry is the best and the most innovative in the world. But we have to be very careful that we keep that advantage and that we keep producing cars that can match or even overtake what is produced elsewhere. Just let me remind you that between last year and the end of this year, China will bring 80 models of electric cars to the international market. These are good cars. These are cars that will be affordable more and more. And we need to compete with that. We don't want to give up this essential industry to outsiders.
    If we want to do that, we have to invest in transforming the European car industry, in making these EVs - electric vehicles - for worldwide consumption. For that, also we need to enhance our efforts to build the charging infrastructure everywhere. This is something the Commission is committed to, and I know this is important to the European Parliament as well.
    Finally, the most important part. We need to skill and reskill our workforce to have a sustainable job in the car industry of the future. We don't need less people, we need people with other skills. I need to insist on this because the industrial revolution is happening whether we like it or not. We can choose to lead it. We can choose to do it in a way that is socially compatible with our values. Or we can leave it to other parts of the world to lead it, and then all we can do is follow and deindustrialise.
    We need to rebuild our industry on the basis of the future, and the car industry can lead this, if you vote for this proposal today."};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned related to electric vehicles:

1. The need to bring electric mobility, especially for passenger cars, up to scale as quickly as possible to provide affordable and clean mobility.
2. The European car industry has already made a choice in favor of electric vehicles, and they have gone a long way in understanding where the global car industry is heading.
3. The running costs of electric vehicles are already lower than those of combustion engine cars, and within a few years, buying an electric vehicle will also be cheaper than buying a combustion-engine car.
4. Electric vehicles need to be produced for worldwide consumption, which requires investing in transforming the European car industry.
5. Enhancing efforts to build charging infrastructure everywhere is necessary to support the widespread adoption of electric vehicles.

Overall, the speech emphasizes the importance of promoting electric vehicles as a key part of the future of the car industry and the need to invest in their development and infrastructure to remain competitive globally."};0;0;0;1;1;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;
"2023-02-14_3-4";"Karima Delli";"NA";"
    Reporting for the opinion of the Transport and Tourism Committee. - Madam President, Mr. Commissioner, dear colleagues, we have reached, with a lot of work and intelligence, a historic agreement that reconciles the car and the climate. However, this is still something because, normally, these are two enemy brothers. This is a transitional agreement: it programs the end of thermal vehicle production and their replacement by zero-emission cars.
    We are at the heart of the great ecological theories, we do ecological planning. No big revolution, no job loss when there is a key, but we have turned off, with an intelligent and coordinated calendar with the industry, the last combustion engines. We turn them off for 2035. The signal to the industry is clear: you must move now because, in 2035, it's over. I remind you: transport accounts for a quarter of EU CO2 emissions. Light vehicles alone are responsible for about 10% of emissions on the Old Continent. So, there is no choice: the automotive industry must play the game and take its share to achieve carbon neutrality by 2050.
    But if the automotive industry plays the game this time, it will have to be accompanied. Let's create incentives for companies to go towards zero-emission fleets. Companies are, especially, the first buyers of new vehicles in Europe, ahead of individuals. Let's use leasing tools in companies to promote electric and hydrogen, as has been done for gasoline and diesel. Let's create financial incentives so that no electric vehicle is more expensive than its equivalent thermal.
    But, please, dear colleagues, Mr. Commissioner, I see it too often: stop the gigantism! No electric SUVs at 40,000 euros! They are not ecological and they are not affordable. After that, we move on to heavy goods vehicles: same effects on the climate, same mechanism. The European Parliament can deal with this today, as the Commission is about to present its roadmap on CO2 emissions from trucks.
    So, dear colleagues, it is with a lot of pride that I participate, as president of the Transport Committee, in this march, in this measure, in engraving in history a page that turns. I would like to continue to ask you for political courage also in the coming months.
    This is the meaning of our fight for the climate, this is what scientists ask us, it is our responsibility towards future generations, who are on the street, who walk and ask us to act."};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned related to electric vehicles:

1. The agreement aims to replace thermal vehicle production with zero-emission cars, including electric vehicles.
2. It is planned to turn off combustion engines by 2035, signaling to the industry that they must move towards producing electric and hydrogen-powered vehicles.
3. Incentives will be created for companies to adopt zero-emission fleets, such as using leasing tools to promote electric and hydrogen vehicles.
4. Financial incentives will be provided so that no electric vehicle is more expensive than its equivalent thermal vehicle.
5. The speaker criticizes the production of large and expensive electric SUVs (around 40,000 euros), stating they are not ecological and not affordable.

Overall, the speech emphasizes the need for a transition to electric vehicles as part of the EU's efforts to achieve carbon neutrality by 2050."};0;0;1;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;
"2023-02-14_3-6";"Sara Cerdas";"S&D";"
    On behalf of the S&D Group. - Madam President, Vice-President, Colleagues, the transport sector represents 25% of the total carbon emissions in Europe and cars and vans, together with heavy vehicles, are responsible for more than 70% of these emissions.
    The link between the environment and our health is also too evident: one quarter of global deaths is caused by environmental problems, 10% of cancers in Europe are caused by air pollution, and for each degree of increase in average temperature, there is a 2% increased risk of cardiovascular accidents.
    There is no time to lose, nor any time for half measures, as the right in this House wants to make believe. The European Union must act now.
    Over the last year and a half, this Parliament has worked tirelessly to produce a climate legislative package that is fair, ambitious and focused on the future. It is therefore extremely satisfying that we have agreed to turn the European Union into a space with cleaner air, by establishing that from 2035 only zero-emission cars may be sold. This measure will facilitate the development of the market in increasing the supply of sustainable options, reducing prices, promoting technological development and creating a rapid second and third-hand market.
    A change at this level will affect workers and small and medium-sized businesses. Therefore, we need mechanisms that monitor the situation and allow for a response adapted and cautious to the challenges that arise, ensuring that this is a fair transition that leaves no one behind.
    Colleagues, difficult negotiations, as you may have noticed from these interventions, but the industry has also signaled that it is ready. It is time for the European Union to take responsibility for its emissions and take the lead in combating climate change.
    From 2035, all new cars in the European Union will be zero-emission vehicles, a measure that must be an example for the whole world. This legislation complies with the Paris Agreement and the Climate Law and has unparalleled positive repercussions for our planet and all those who live on it.
    Finally, words of gratitude to Jan and the negotiating team for reaching this agreement, to the Commission, the Council, and from my side, special thanks to Juliana and Eliana."};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned related to electric vehicles:

1. From 2035, only zero-emission cars (which implies electric vehicles) may be sold in the European Union.
2. This measure aims to facilitate the development of the market for sustainable options, reduce prices, promote technological development, and create a rapid second- and third-hand market.
3. All new cars in the European Union will be zero-emission vehicles from 2035.

In summary, the speech mentions that electric vehicles (zero-emission cars) will become the only type of car sold in the European Union starting from 2035, with the goal of promoting sustainable options and reducing emissions."};0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;1;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2023-02-14_3-7";"Bas Eickhout";"Greens/EFA";"on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group. – Madam Chair, first of all, I really would like to congratulate the rapporteur, Jan Huitema, for his great work on this file.
Of course, it started with a proposal by the Commission, and I do know that it was a big fight in the Commission to get it out. But I think after that the institutions worked in a very clear manner to deliver on this file. And this file is crucial, it’s crucial to reach climate neutrality. And I just want to remind my colleagues who are now complaining: in 2020 they all signed up to Climate Emergency, in 2021 they all signed up to a climate law where climate neutrality is enshrined in our law now.
And this is the first law, the first law that we are working on a sector, a sector that is innovative, a sector that is moving, a sector that is shifting towards electric cars. And we can put in a law that is helping them. Giving clarity, giving clarity to the market, giving clarity to the supply chain that this is the way to go, and this is where Europe will lead instead of lagging behind.
Because, colleagues, also in California they are going to zero-emission vehicles by 2030, 100%. In China, they are moving there. If we want to maintain leadership on our car manufacturing, then we have to give clarity and a very strong signal to our markets. And those who claim to talk for industry are leaving industry behind, because this kind of talking about not even going to 100% is only undermining the innovation that we want to attract within Europe. And that’s at stake for today.
And that is also why we as Greens, who always have shown that competitiveness, innovation and climate action go hand in hand. This is why we are so much in support of this proposal.
I just have to, however, have a little complaint because this is also a fight that we need for the trucks. Also, the trucks should go to zero emissions if we want to take the climate neutrality serious, because trucks are still the easier to abate sector if you look at airplanes and ships. And, therefore, I hope the leaks are wrong that the Commission is not going to propose a 100% reduction by 2040, but that they are going to produce that 100% reduction by 2040 and not the 90%. Because this file on the cars shows we can deliver.
So please, Commission, step up your game on trucks so that we can really deliver on climate neutrality and innovation on this very important sector within Europe."};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned related to electric vehicles:

1. The speaker mentions that the sector of electric cars is ""innovative"", ""moving"", and ""shifting"" towards electric vehicles.
2. It is stated that Europe should give clarity and a strong signal to its markets to lead in the transition to electric vehicles, rather than lagging behind other countries like California (which aims to have zero-emission vehicles by 2030) and China.
3. The speaker emphasizes the importance of setting a clear goal for the transition to electric vehicles, mentioning that ""those who claim to talk for industry are leaving industry behind"" if they do not support a 100% reduction in emissions.
4. It is mentioned that the proposal on cars shows that it is possible to deliver on climate neutrality and innovation, and therefore, the speaker hopes that the Commission will propose a 100% reduction in emissions from trucks by 2040.

Overall, the speech highlights the importance of transitioning to electric vehicles as a crucial step towards achieving climate neutrality and maintaining Europe's leadership in the automotive industry."};0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2023-02-14_3-8";"Sylvia Limmer";"ID";"
    On behalf of the ID faction. – Madam President, Mr. Timmermans, dear colleagues! It's very simple: There is no emissions-free transportation, even the electric car propagandists among us know that. The emissions from electric cars are just shifted, for example to coal power plants, which will now have to step in not only during wind and/or dark load peaks in the future, or those released during the production of traction batteries. For a single battery, over 1,000 tons of waste is moved and up to 40 tons of CO2 are released before the electric car has even driven a single kilometer. That's why the ladies and gentlemen of the green-socialist united front here in the European Parliament - well fed by the taxpayer - should tell citizens that running and cycling is healthy. Millions of jobs are also being shifted to third countries.
    
    But the arguments have long been exchanged. Today it's about taking sides in the vote. And I hope that you don't hope that they will go unnoticed by citizens and voters, as usual. In particular, dear German colleagues from the CDU, CSU, and FDP: You can - as is so often the case - vote with the green-lacquered prosperity destroyers and economic prophets or, for once - so to speak on the last button - vote together with us for technological openness, for individual mobility, for the citizen, and against blatantly obvious green nonsense. We will find out this afternoon."};"According to the speech, the following points are made about electric vehicles:

1. Electric cars are not emissions-free: The speaker claims that even those who promote electric cars acknowledge this fact.
2. Emissions from electric cars are shifted: Instead of being emitted directly by the car, the emissions are shifted to other sources, such as coal power plants.
3. Production of traction batteries releases CO2: The production of traction batteries for electric cars results in the release of up to 40 tons of CO2.
4. Waste is generated during battery production: Over 1,000 tons of waste is generated during the production of a single battery.

Overall, the speaker presents these points as criticisms of electric vehicles and suggests that they are not as environmentally friendly as they may seem."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2023-02-14_3-12";"Pascal Arimont";"EPP";"
    Dear Madam President, esteemed Mr. Vice-President of the Commission, dear colleagues! Mr. Vice-President, I am not in agreement with your opinion. I consider the decision to ban combustion engines from 2035 to be a huge strategic mistake. No one disputes that electric cars will play an important and central role in reducing our CO2 emissions in Europe in the future. However, putting all our eggs in one basket has nothing to do with strategic foresight as you have just explained.
    
    The basic goal is correct: We must achieve long-term climate neutral mobility in Europe in order to achieve important climate policy goals. However, this must be designed technologically neutral and not so that only a single technical solution is allowed which must be implemented by all. An approach like this we do not pursue otherwise.
    
    In the case of emissions trading, for example, it is about achieving a certain reduction in CO2 emissions and encouraging compliance with it. Companies are not prescribed the way and the technology to get there. Why are we doing it differently with cars? A decision like this kills innovation and is also not conducive to climate protection as a whole, because losing sight of the fact that the CO2 balance is not favorable, from power generation to production, this will be disregarded, and in my opinion, this is a sign of great double morality. Ignoring it also does not help to simply ignore that we are heading into a new dependence on China - the raw materials and rare earths needed will be processed there.
    
    The combustion engine with climate-neutral E-fuels would have had a future until 2035 as well, for example. Perhaps it is not profitable now, but in 2030 maybe it could be and perhaps also important for airplanes, trucks, and ships.
    
    The European Commission is simply killing every European innovation in this area. Other countries will know how to exploit this gap. I consider this neither far-sighted nor smart, especially considering the many jobs involved. Today, it is reported in Cologne that Ford is rationalizing jobs there.
    
    And I have not yet spoken about range, charging infrastructure, roads, transit problems or the high purchase costs. I am not fundamentally against electric cars. I am fundamentally against being prohibited from using a climate-neutral combustion engine in 2035 (the speaker speaks with the microphone turned off). I am not the only one who thinks this way."};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned related to electric vehicles:

1. Electric cars will play an important and central role in reducing CO2 emissions in Europe in the future.
2. The speaker is not fundamentally against electric cars, but rather against prohibiting the use of climate-neutral combustion engines in 2035.

The speaker does not provide any additional information about electric vehicles beyond these two points."};0;1;0;1;1;0;0;1;0;0;1;0;1;0;0;0;0;
"2023-02-14_3-13";"Tiemo Wölken";"S&D";"
    Madam President, dear Commissioner Timmermans! Today we will decide whether to abolish the combustion engine in the European Union for new registrations from 2035. And that is right that we make this decision - on the one hand, for climatic reasons, because greenhouse gas emissions are still too high in road traffic, and on the other hand, but also for industrial reasons.
    Other parts of the world, such as the USA, for example, are investing massively in green technologies. As Europeans, we do not want to lose touch if we want planning security for manufacturers. The manufacturers want to take this path. They need a legally secure framework. We create it.
    When the EPP says that it is about workers, I ask: Why deny planning security to colleagues? Why did you vote for less money in the transformation funds in negotiations? And why do you act as if you are interested in workers? After all, it's just about lobbying for synthetic fuels. But synthetic fuels are not a solution: we don't have them, they are much too expensive, and we need them in other sectors and not in road traffic, where we can directly electrify.
    And honestly, it is only said that we have no charging infrastructure - then we regulate the establishment of charging infrastructure. Then it is said that we have no raw materials - then we make recycling for batteries. You constantly invent new arguments, you close your eyes to reality. If we had made politics like this in recent years, there would be no industry left in the European Union.
    And a last point: The way to the future is not looking back. The way to the future is actually looking at what is possible. For the European automotive industry, electromobility and the use of hydrogen are the future. And - do not forget - that is not excluded either. And synthetic fuels also rely on hydrogen, they are just much less efficient. They are simply no solution. And with that, I come to a conclusion and hope that reason prevails and we will agree with the trilog result today."};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned related to electric vehicles:

1. Electrification of road traffic: The speaker mentions that it's possible to directly electrify road traffic, implying that electric vehicles can be used as a solution.
2. Future of the European automotive industry: The speaker states that electromobility and the use of hydrogen are the future for the European automotive industry, suggesting that electric vehicles will play a significant role in this future.
3. Charging infrastructure: The speaker mentions that if there is no charging infrastructure, it can be regulated to establish one, implying that the lack of charging infrastructure is not an insurmountable barrier to the adoption of electric vehicles.

Overall, the speech presents electric vehicles as a viable and promising solution for the future of road traffic in Europe."};0;0;1;1;1;1;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;1;
"2023-02-14_3-15";"Michael Bloss";"Greens/EFA";"
    Madam President, dear ladies and gentlemen! Thank you very much to Mr. First Vice-President of the Commission, Timmermans, and those who have made it possible for us to vote on this result today.
    We finally put an end to the climate-damaging combustion engine. This is good for climate protection and also good for the economy. We are thus creating clarity: As of 2035, no new combustion engines will be approved, and the automotive industry and employees can adapt to this transformation - and they are already doing so. The climate-friendly electric mobility cannot be stopped worldwide. Let us finally enter this competition: Let's build the most powerful batteries, the most modern cars in Europe, and secure jobs and the European automotive location for the future.
    In the transport sector, we have always been offside with climate goals so far. And that is also a result of conservative politics in the last 20 years. And they are trying it again now not to do anything for climate protection in the transport sector, and hopefully, they will fail today. Because 2035 is good for climate protection, but it is still much too late. And many car manufacturers have already been leaving earlier.
    Let me say something about e-fuels. Some who spoke here previously were misled. The ADAC, that's not a green fringe organization, but they calculate that one wind turbine can supply 160 electric cars, but only 52 e-fuel cars. E-fuels are inefficient. They will always be more expensive than electric cars and have no future. And that is why we also clearly exclude this in the law, even if some others claim something else.
    With the end of combustion engines, it is clear: The industry is turning towards e-mobility - that's the guarantee that they will stay. The success story of the industry in Europe is not based on the fact that we build internal combustion engines, but that everyone and everyone works every day to make products better. The inventive spirit, precision, reliability, engineering art - that's what makes us strong, and with this, we secure the European automotive location for the future. Anything else would be deindustrialization policy."};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned related to electric vehicles:

1. The speaker states that ""the climate-friendly electric mobility cannot be stopped worldwide"" and emphasizes the need for Europe to enter this competition.
2. It is mentioned that as of 2035, no new combustion engines will be approved, which implies a shift towards electric vehicles.
3. The speaker highlights the importance of building powerful batteries and modern cars in Europe to secure jobs and the European automotive location for the future.
4. In response to previous speakers who may have been misled about e-fuels, the speaker emphasizes that e-fuels are inefficient and will always be more expensive than electric cars, with no future.
5. The speaker explicitly excludes e-fuels from the law, stating that they have no future.

Overall, the speech emphasizes the importance of transitioning to electric vehicles as a key step towards climate protection and securing the European automotive industry's future."};0;0;1;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2023-02-14_3-17";"Alexandr Vondra";"ECR";" – Madam President, what we have before us here is probably one of the most foolish solutions that we have discussed in this period. Nothing against electric cars. They make sense in cities. They are expensive, but young people love them. They accelerate like a cheetah. 
    However, betting on one solution creates a monopoly. And a monopoly always goes against prosperity and freedom. Let's strangle the middle class, multiply the ranks of the unemployed, limit human freedom, and feed China, which is far ahead in this matter – in batteries and software. After all, there is a problem connecting to the internet in Bavaria on the autobahn. 
    I will therefore vote against it as well, in the hope that we will still give a chance to technological neutrality, that we will still give a chance to the development of synthetic fuels and thus also give a chance to competition, which alone ensures innovation and preserves human freedom. (The speaker agreed to answer questions based on their speech after raising the blue card)."};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned related to electric vehicles:

1. Electric cars make sense in cities.
2. They are expensive, but young people love them.
3. They accelerate quickly, like a cheetah.

These statements suggest that the speaker acknowledges the benefits of electric vehicles, particularly their suitability for urban areas and their appeal to younger generations."};0;1;1;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;1;0;
"2023-02-14_3-18";"Sara Cerdas";"S&D";"blue-card speech. – I would like to ask the colleague if you have gone through the proposal, because what we negotiated, and before you state that you voted against, is tailpipe zero emissions by 2035. This provides technological neutrality at tailpipe and provides the chance not only to have zero-emission vehicles that are electric, but with other technologies that can arise."};"According to the speech, it is mentioned that ""zero-emission vehicles that are electric"" will be possible by 2035. This means that electric vehicles (EVs) will have zero tailpipe emissions by this year. The speaker also mentions that technological neutrality is provided at the tailpipe, which implies that not only EVs but also other technologies can arise to achieve zero emissions."};0;0;1;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2023-02-14_3-23";"Massimiliano Salini";"EPP";"
    Madam President, esteemed colleagues, Mr. Vice President, I am certain that we will also win this challenge. We have won more complex ones in Europe.
    However, in the analysis of the agreement that has been reached with the trilogue, I point out that the main problem is precisely an environmental one. Why? If we consider what happens outside of Europe, it cannot help but notice how countries, particularly China, where electric mobility is booming, are exactly the countries where electricity is not produced from renewable sources.
    In Europe, where the model of development has always been more inclined towards prudence, towards a mix, towards trying to harmonize solutions, energy production is strongly oriented towards renewable sources. The European mix is good, do not destroy it, do not criticize it acritically, and above all, be more cautious with your language. Do not call them ""clean cars"", ""zero emissions"" vehicles, otherwise you will ask to call nuclear power plants ""clean power plants"", ""zero emission power plants"".
    Pay attention, the industrial problem comes a moment later. The environmental problem is the first problem on which you have been too reckless and is the reason why today, in the vote that we will have, many, even on the left side of this hemicycle, will not vote for this agreement, because there is a problem related to the precise harmonization, typically European, between environmental reasons and the reason for development."};"According to the speech, electric mobility (electric vehicles) is ""booming"" in China. This is mentioned as an example of how countries outside of Europe are not producing electricity from renewable sources, despite having a high adoption rate of electric vehicles.

Additionally, the speaker cautions against calling electric vehicles ""clean cars"" or ""zero emissions"" vehicles, suggesting that this terminology could be applied to other industries (such as nuclear power) and implies that it is not entirely accurate."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;
"2023-02-14_3-24";"Mohammed Chahim";"S&D";"
    Chairman, who knows the Stanley brand? Perhaps you know it from the popular children's movie ""Cars"" as Stanley Steamer. If not, I would say: ask your children. In the late 19th century, Stanley made a very successful car with a steam engine. At that time, this was a very reliable technology, especially compared to the emerging internal combustion engine. At one point, Stanley made more cars than any other American automobile company.
    The parallels with today are truly amazing. To counter the rise of the internal combustion engine, Stanley, as one of the first, began a campaign to sow fear, uncertainty, and doubt. The internal combustion engine was said to be unreliable and could explode. Where do we recognize that from? From the smear campaign against this regulation and electric cars, also in this Parliament. In 1924, they closed their doors at Stanley definitively because they were not able to compete with the internal combustion engine. We also know that it will be very difficult for the internal combustion engine to remain competitive. The electric car is already cheaper to use and the purchase price continues to decrease.
    Competition and development outside Europe are increasing rapidly. If we want to help the automotive industry in Europe to be future-proof and competitive, we must accept this regulation today. This will bring us closer to our climate goals, improve air quality, and above all prevent European Stanleys.
    (The speaker accepts a ""blue card"" reaction)"};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned related to electric vehicles:

1. The electric car is already cheaper to use compared to internal combustion engine cars.
2. The purchase price of electric cars continues to decrease.
3. Electric cars will make it difficult for internal combustion engines to remain competitive in the market.

These points suggest that electric vehicles have an advantage over traditional gasoline-powered cars, and their cost-effectiveness and decreasing prices are likely to contribute to their increasing popularity and adoption."};0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;
"2023-02-14_3-26";"Mohammed Chahim";"S&D";"
    Answer to a ""blue map"" response. – Look, I'm trying to find arguments here. The climate argument is more than clear because it has enough urgency to tackle this problem. For other aspects, I try to come up with arguments from an economic point of view. If we see what is happening in America with the support for electric cars, if I see how many Asian brands are bringing a technology to Europe that is miles ahead of most of our own European brands, then I worry if we are fast enough with an answer and if we still have a chance to keep this sector in Europe. That can be done by creating very clear frameworks. We need to make those frameworks today."};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned related to electric vehicles:

1. The speaker mentions that they see what's happening in America with support for electric cars.
2. They note that many Asian brands are bringing advanced technology for electric cars to Europe, which is ahead of most European brands.
3. The speaker expresses concern about whether Europe is moving fast enough to keep up with the development and adoption of electric vehicles.

That's a summary of what's said about electric vehicles in the text!"};0;1;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2023-02-14_3-27";"Michal Wiezik";"Renew";"
    Dear Madam President, the goal of complete reduction of emissions from private transport is indeed a huge benefit for the climate and at the same time it is a strong modernizing stream in car transportation with benefits for air quality, noise and public health. Please support, especially for Slovakia, a country that produces the most cars per capita, this is a very fundamental shift, but by no means an easy one.
    
    From the beginning, I have insisted that we should have a plan and financing for the comprehensive re-qualification of employees in this sector. I am very pleased that this requirement has been included in the final agreement text. This ensures that the transition to electromobility will not only be green but also fair.
    
    It remains to be resolved to create a robust system of battery production without excessive dependence on third countries. It is crucial that this critical industry also complies with strict environmental protection standards. No exception is possible. The principle of not creating a waiver for the environment must remain a fundamental principle of fair transition."};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned related to electric vehicles:

1. The speaker mentions the ""transition to electromobility"" which implies that they are referring to the shift towards using electric vehicles.
2. They emphasize the importance of ensuring that this transition is not only environmentally friendly (green) but also fair for employees in the sector, mentioning that a plan and financing for re-qualifying employees has been included in the final agreement text.
3. The speaker highlights the need to create a robust system of battery production within the country, without excessive dependence on third countries, and stresses that this critical industry must comply with strict environmental protection standards.

In summary, the speech mentions the transition to electric vehicles (electromobility), emphasizes the importance of fair treatment for employees in the sector, and highlights the need for a robust domestic battery production system that meets high environmental standards."};0;1;1;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;
"2023-02-14_3-29";"Teuvo Hakkarainen";"ID";" – Dear Mr. Speaker, when the European Union fell, the whole world sighed in relief that communism would be over. But it's like the coronavirus, it takes new forms. The draft in hand is a living example of this. Half of the world is now running from an imaginary problem, the climate crisis, driven by the global warming scare. One proof is the ban on diesel cars. We don't discuss how much damage this ban causes to the entire European economy, let alone the people who drive cars.
    The truth will come against electric car charging stations. An electric car is cleaner than a gasoline car when the whole life cycle is considered. There is still a lot of development needed before we can give up gasoline and oil, if ever. The latest diesel cars are almost emissions-free, however."};"According to the speech, it is mentioned that:

* Electric cars are cleaner than gasoline cars when considering their whole life cycle.
* There is still a lot of development needed before we can give up gasoline and oil, if ever.
* The truth about electric car charging stations will come.

These points suggest that the speaker acknowledges the potential benefits of electric vehicles in terms of environmental impact, but also notes that there are still challenges to be addressed before they can become a widespread alternative to traditional gasoline-powered cars."};0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2023-02-14_3-31";"Marina Mesure";"The Left";" - Madam President, Commissioner, dear colleagues, at first glance, banning the sale of new combustion engine vehicles by 2035 is a good thing. Because the CO2 emissions released by our cars not only cause climate warming, but also poison the health of millions of people due to air pollution.
     - However, pursuing these ambitious and necessary objectives without any planning is irresponsible, especially if it comes to betting on a 100% electric car fleet.
     - First, these electric cars are very expensive: people will therefore prioritize used thermal cars rather than buying new electric cars.
     - Secondly, although electric cars pollute the atmosphere less, what about the manufacturing process? The lithium is extracted at the cost of considerable environmental pollution.
     - In addition, neither lithium, nor cobalt, nor rare earths are currently mined in Europe, making us structurally dependent on other continents for supply.
     - Furthermore, due to a lack of protectionism, Chinese electric vehicles are arriving on our market: today 5% market share, but 20% within two years according to estimates, with the first consequence being, for our automotive industry, the closure of factories employing more than 13 million Europeans.
     - Finally, more electric cars mean more demand for electricity. Since the liberalization of the energy sector, electricity production stagnates in Europe, and we are even experiencing this winter the first power cuts.
     - So, how many new nuclear power plants or coal-fired power plants will be needed to operate, in the long term, a European car fleet of more than 280 million electric cars? All this is not serious.
     - Striving for less polluting mobility? Of course! But by anticipating needs and including all this in a real public transport policy."};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned regarding electric vehicles:

1. Electric cars are very expensive, which may lead people to prioritize buying used thermal cars instead of new electric cars.
2. Although electric cars pollute the atmosphere less, the manufacturing process involves environmental pollution due to the extraction of lithium and other materials.
3. Europe is structurally dependent on other continents for the supply of lithium, cobalt, and rare earths needed for electric car production.
4. Chinese electric vehicles are entering the European market, which could lead to a significant market share (estimated 20% within two years) and potentially result in the closure of factories employing over 13 million Europeans.
5. A large-scale adoption of electric cars would increase demand for electricity, but Europe's energy sector has stagnated since liberalization, and power cuts are already occurring this winter.
6. The speaker questions how many new nuclear or coal-fired power plants would be needed to support a European car fleet of over 280 million electric cars in the long term.

Overall, the speech expresses concerns about the feasibility and sustainability of transitioning to an all-electric car fleet without proper planning and consideration of the environmental and economic implications."};0;1;1;1;0;0;1;0;1;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;
"2023-02-14_3-32";"Milan Uhrík";"NI";"
    Dear Madam President, I would like to ask if anyone has seen any technology in this European directive on reducing emissions or if it is only written by accidental activists and officials because the pressure for pointless reductions of emissions below the physical possible limits would sentence every technically educated person.
    
    I just remind that the European Union produces only 8% of global CO2 emissions, of which 13% comes from the automotive industry. This means that if emissions are not reduced worldwide, Europe will not save itself.
    
    You say that from 2035, selling cars with internal combustion engines should be banned in Europe and people must buy only electric vehicles. But I wonder where those people will get money for these expensive electric vehicles? How much will electricity cost when there is already a shortage now? You say we need to reduce dependence on oil. Well, but then we create a dependence on lithium, which is necessary for the production of batteries for electric cars. And already Asian companies are saying that if Europe wants lithium, they won't sell it to us and instead they will sell us whole finished electric vehicles. What would mean the end of the automotive industry in Europe.
    
    I am in favor of transitioning to electromobility, but it must be natural, thoughtful, and above all economically advantageous for both individuals and the environment."};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned related to electric vehicles:

1. From 2035, it is planned to ban the sale of cars with internal combustion engines in Europe and instead require people to buy only electric vehicles.
2. The speaker questions where people will get money for these expensive electric vehicles.
3. The speaker also mentions that electricity costs may increase due to a current shortage.
4. The production of batteries for electric cars requires lithium, which creates a dependence on this resource.
5. Asian companies are threatening not to sell lithium to Europe if they want it, instead offering to sell finished electric vehicles, which could lead to the end of the automotive industry in Europe.

Overall, the speaker is skeptical about the feasibility and economic viability of transitioning to electromobility, especially considering the potential dependence on lithium and the high cost of electric vehicles."};0;0;0;1;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;1;0;
"2023-02-14_3-33";"Barbara Thaler";"EPP";"
    Dear Madam President, Mr. Vice President, dear colleagues! I must really say: It was once easier to stand here and speak on a topic than I believe we are truly facing a historic wrong decision today.
    We ban the combustion engine today. That was wrong, it is wrong, and it remains wrong. We are only entering a new dependence on China for rare earths and metals for batteries, for which we leave no alternative at all. We give up green jobs in Europe, we give up added value, and we weaken our position as an industrial continent. And all of this without coming any closer to our global goal, climate protection, even just a small step on a global scale.
    Please do not misunderstand me: The need to actively pursue climate protection is in no way questioned. But a good solution is rarely black or white. Technological neutrality is the only way to achieve two birds with one stone: pursuing climate protection and making Europe competitive.
    I am truly deeply convinced that a car with an engine from Steyr, driven by E-fuels from Denmark or bioethanol from Austria, helps the climate more than an electric car from China or America, driven by coal power. Therefore, I will oppose this ban with full conviction."};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned related to electric vehicles:

1. The speaker believes that banning combustion engines will lead to a new dependence on China for rare earths and metals needed for batteries.
2. This means that Europe will have no alternative but to rely on China for these resources.
3. The speaker argues that an electric car from China or America, driven by coal power, does not help the climate more than a car with an engine from Steyr (Austria), driven by E-fuels from Denmark or bioethanol from Austria.

In summary, the speaker is critical of the ban on combustion engines and believes that it will lead to a dependence on China for battery resources, while also questioning the environmental benefits of electric vehicles powered by coal."};0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;1;0;0;0;0;
"2023-02-14_3-36";"Anna Deparnay-Grunenberg";"Greens/EFA";" – Dear Madam President, ladies and gentlemen! Today we celebrate one of the central successes of the European Green Deal: The end of combustion engines is coming.
    For years, emissions in the transport sector have not decreased - in some cases they have even increased. But with the ban on petrol and diesel cars for passenger cars in 2035, an important step has been taken and the transition to electric mobility is certain. And we finally dare to signal clarity to the industry. For this, I am also negotiating at full speed with the Council for a rapid expansion of charging columns throughout Europe.
    But heavy goods vehicles emit almost one third of CO2 emissions and are still blocking our roads. It's high time for an end to combustion engines not only in passenger cars but also in freight transport and a drastic shift to rail. We demand a ban on combustion engines for all heavy goods vehicles by 2035, at the latest 2040. Otherwise - and we know this - our climate protection goals will simply not be achievable.
    Thank you for this step today. Let's celebrate!"};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned related to electric vehicles:

1. The ban on petrol and diesel cars for passenger cars will be implemented by 2035, which is an important step towards the transition to electric mobility.
2. The speaker is negotiating with the Council to rapidly expand charging columns throughout Europe.

In summary, the speech highlights the importance of transitioning to electric mobility in the transport sector, specifically mentioning the ban on petrol and diesel cars for passenger cars and the need for rapid expansion of charging infrastructure."};0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2023-02-14_3-38";"Robert Roos";"ECR";" – Chairman, ""Every worker should have their own car!"" A beautiful statement by Joop den Uyl, Mr. Timmermans. From the time when social democrats still stood up for people. From the time when established parties still stood for progress.
    That time is over. And the ideal of every person having their own car is in danger of disappearing. The VVD is now even responsible for the plan within the EU to only allow electric cars from 2035 onwards. These will always have a high purchase price due to their expensive batteries. As a result, hardworking people with low income will no longer be able to buy a car in the future. This will deprive millions of Dutch people of their freedom. And let me make it clear: that is not an unfortunate consequence of the policy. No, that is the policy.
    With this EU policy, the Netherlands becomes one big city. Full of prefab houses, full of migrants and full of wind turbines. Without farmers, without private cars and without freedom. That's the direction it's going in. I want to preserve our beautiful Netherlands. I want to preserve our freedom. And that's why, Mr. Timmermans, I will continue to oppose this agenda."};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned related to electric vehicles:

1. The EU has a plan to only allow electric cars from 2035 onwards.
2. Electric cars will have a high purchase price due to their expensive batteries.
3. As a result of this policy, hardworking people with low income will no longer be able to buy a car in the future.

In summary, the speaker is criticizing the EU's plan to phase out non-electric cars by 2035, arguing that it will make electric cars unaffordable for many people and deprive them of their freedom."};0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;
"2023-02-14_3-39";"Mislav Kolakušić";"NI";" – Dear Madam President, dear colleagues, dear citizens, leaders of the auto industry, heads of Mazda and Toyota tell us that as politicians we should not interfere in development and force electric cars because we would thus completely stop the development of this industry. 
    What I say is that Edison could have stopped Tesla by law or force or any other way to develop alternating current, alternating current, we would still be in the 19th century. We are now forcing one type of cable and one kind of auto industry. This is unacceptable! The stop of development is impossible.
    Secondly, what will happen is that with the introduction of tens of millions of cars on electric power, electricity consumption will skyrocket. It will cost like gold and poor citizens will no longer be able to afford it. We will return to the age of stone and candles. Is anyone in this Parliament calculated how much electricity is needed to supply all the cars? Thank you. No one has!"};"According to the speech, the speaker argues that:

1. Politicians should not interfere with the development of electric cars because it would stop the industry's progress.
2. The introduction of tens of millions of electric vehicles will lead to a significant increase in electricity consumption, making it expensive and unaffordable for poor citizens.
3. The speaker questions whether anyone has calculated how much electricity is needed to supply all these electric vehicles.

In summary, the speech expresses concerns about the potential consequences of widespread adoption of electric vehicles, including increased electricity costs and affordability issues for low-income individuals."};0;1;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;
"2023-02-14_3-40";"Angelika Niebler";"EPP";"
    – Madam President, Mr. Vice President, dear colleagues! I believe it is wrong to ban internal combustion engines. For our industrial location, this is a slap in the face.
    Without a doubt: electric cars have a bright future. Above all, this is true if the infrastructure is expanded. When we have widespread charging infrastructure, an electric car is a no-brainer. But, it has never been right to rely solely on one technology. Technological neutrality is the order of the day: alternative fuels, synthetic fuels, hydrogen technology also have huge potential.
    And in terms of climate protection, let me tell you: We must also have the goal of making today's cars on the road cleaner, and that can only be done with alternative fuels. In Germany, more than 67 million cars are currently driving on the roads, we need to get started here. It cannot be that everyone has to buy a new electric vehicle in the next few years.
    Banning combustion engines is unfair and does not help climate protection either, because no one needs to believe that outside Europe, cars with internal combustion engines will still be produced. What we do is that we are weakening our own industry, driving companies out of Europe. That is really catastrophic industrial policy.
    (The speaker agrees to answer a word request after the procedure of the ""blue card"")"};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned related to electric vehicles:

1. Electric cars have a bright future.
2. The infrastructure needs to be expanded for electric cars to become more widespread.
3. When there is widespread charging infrastructure, an electric car becomes a ""no-brainer"".

These statements suggest that the speaker believes electric vehicles have potential and could become a popular choice if the necessary infrastructure is in place."};0;1;1;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2023-02-14_3-42";"Angelika Niebler";"EPP";"
    Answer to a word request following the ""blue card"" procedure. - Madam colleague, I hope you have listened carefully to me, your question is easy to answer. The question is: How can we make the traffic area cleaner, and how can we manage to reduce CO2 emissions in traffic? And that's where I am completely convinced that if we focus here on new technologies - and that's not just a technology, it's not just electric mobility, producing an electric car also requires more energy - then we will definitely have the better solution.
    It is about designing the area of land, the fleet, CO2-neutrally. And that's why we can't just focus on electric mobility. We need alternative fuels, biofuels, and must also switch to hydrogen technology.
    To be blind to one eye is simply not possible. I am deeply convinced that we also need the diversity of technologies here."};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned related to electric vehicles:

1. Electric mobility is considered as one of the new technologies that can help reduce CO2 emissions in traffic.
2. Producing an electric car requires more energy, implying that it's not just a simple solution to focus on electric mobility alone.

That's all the information provided about electric vehicles in the text."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2023-02-14_3-43";"Petar Vitanov";"S&D";" – Madam President, I come from a region where people live two years shorter than the average European citizen because of the polluted air they breathe. Exactly, sir. And we have the oldest cars but many still find it more convenient to drive their personal 20 year old vehicle rather than use the public transportation, for example. Sophia, my capital often gets on top of the world air pollution charts. And I come from a region where the industry, however, considers transport electrification is an opportunity for growth, new jobs and better working conditions in the sector. As a chance to become stronger, more efficient and more competitive on a fast developing market. And I come from a region where people's low income is often a barrier to implementing new technologies, and affordability is a really serious issue. 
Strengthening targets and increasing investment in the supply of zero-emission vehicles will reduce the cost and make them more affordable for everyone, including for a second-hand buyers. Whether the market will shift to zero emissions is no longer a question. And it is our job to let that happen in Europe, by providing the legislative framework that is needed. The faster we act, the sooner we will see the benefits of our endeavours. "};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned related to electric vehicles:

1. Transport electrification is considered an opportunity for growth, new jobs, and better working conditions in the sector.
2. Strengthening targets and increasing investment in the supply of zero-emission vehicles will reduce the cost and make them more affordable for everyone, including second-hand buyers.
3. The market is expected to shift to zero emissions (implying a transition to electric vehicles).
4. Providing a legislative framework is necessary to let this happen in Europe.

In summary, the speech highlights the potential benefits of electric vehicles, such as job creation and improved working conditions, and emphasizes the need for increased investment and legislation to make them more affordable and widespread."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;1;0;
"2023-02-14_3-44";"Karin Karlsbro";"Renew";"
    Mr. President! Commission, colleagues! Leaving fossil fuels behind us not only gives us greener vehicles for the sake of the climate, but also concerns security, not being dependent on Putin or other oil dictatorships every time we need to fill up our cars.
    Fossil-fueled cars will soon or already belong to history. The automotive industry is changing quickly and it is important that the EU gives the industry clear guidelines on when the transition must be completed latest. Predictability is the key to maintaining the pace of the transition. At the same time, we must ensure that when we switch to electric vehicles, the whole EU has carbon-free electricity production and that we use sustainable batteries. I am glad that the battery directive passed before Christmas.
    And to you on the right side who are against this proposal, I would like to conclude by saying: The Stone Age did not end because there were no more stones."};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned related to electric vehicles:

1. Electric vehicles will be ""greener"" for the sake of the climate.
2. The transition from fossil-fueled cars to electric vehicles is necessary to reduce dependence on oil dictatorships like Putin's Russia.
3. The automotive industry is changing quickly and needs clear guidelines from the EU on when the transition must be completed.
4. Predictability is key to maintaining the pace of the transition to electric vehicles.
5. When switching to electric vehicles, it is important that the whole EU has carbon-free electricity production.
6. Sustainable batteries are also necessary for a successful transition.

Overall, the speaker emphasizes the importance of transitioning to electric vehicles as a way to reduce our reliance on fossil fuels and mitigate climate change, while also ensuring that the transition is done in a sustainable and predictable manner."};0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;1;1;1;0;0;0;0;
"2023-02-14_3-47";"Peter Lundgren";"ECR";" – Mr. Speaker! In 2035, they will ban diesel and gasoline. It is completely crazy. And it's the same mistake that Germany and other countries made in the energy issue where they shut down nuclear power and now they have to evict people from villages to dig up coal that they need to produce electricity.
    And electricity is now so expensive that people have to leave their homes even though they are freezing inside. How do you think these people will be able to buy an electric car, and how can they afford to charge it with current electricity prices?
    Moreover, we don't have the natural resources needed to produce the amount of batteries that electric car enthusiasts believe is the solution to all problems. Lithium, cobalt, and so on. The world's known reserves of these minerals are around 10% of the estimated demand. What is wrong with you? Why do you think we will be able to switch to electric cars when we don't have the natural resources to do it?"};"According to the speech, the speaker expresses skepticism about the feasibility of switching to electric cars due to several reasons:

1. **Electricity prices**: The speaker argues that electricity is now expensive, making it difficult for people to afford charging their electric vehicles.
2. **Lack of natural resources**: The speaker claims that the world's known reserves of minerals needed to produce batteries (lithium, cobalt, etc.) are only around 10% of the estimated demand, implying that there may not be enough resources to meet the expected demand for electric cars.

The speaker does not mention any positive aspects or benefits of electric vehicles, but rather focuses on the challenges and limitations they face."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;1;0;
"2023-02-14_3-51";"Jakop G. Dalunde";"Greens/EFA";" – Mr. Chairman! Dear colleagues, Commissioners! The time of petrol-powered cars is over. The electric car revolution is here. On average, every car we sell on the market today will be driven for 20 years into the future. If 20 years from now we are well into the 2040s, we should be close to zero in our emissions.
    Therefore, it is wise consumer policy to ensure that we sell fewer petrol cars now and more electric cars so that people who buy a petrol or diesel car in the future do not have to stop using it prematurely.
    It is also wise industrial policy. At present, most companies selling electric cars on the market have their base outside Europe, but with sharp politics here in Europe, we ensure that more electric cars have a strong home market in Europe and the industry can grow. The time of petrol-powered cars is over, the electric car revolution is here."};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned related to electric vehicles:

1. The ""electric car revolution"" has arrived, implying that electric vehicles are becoming increasingly popular.
2. It is stated that every car sold today will be driven for 20 years into the future, which suggests that electric vehicles will continue to play a significant role in the market for decades to come.
3. The goal is to reduce emissions to near zero by the 2040s, implying that electric vehicles are seen as a key part of achieving this goal due to their lower environmental impact compared to petrol-powered cars.
4. It is suggested that consumer policy should prioritize selling more electric cars and fewer petrol cars in order to avoid prematurely rendering petrol or diesel cars obsolete for future buyers.
5. The speech also mentions the importance of having a strong home market for electric car manufacturers within Europe, implying that this will help the industry grow.

Overall, the text presents electric vehicles as a key part of the future of transportation and emphasizes the need to prioritize their development and adoption in order to reduce emissions and promote sustainable growth."};0;0;1;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2023-02-14_3-52";"Matteo Adinolfi";"ID";" - Mr. President, esteemed colleagues, the obsessive search for climate neutrality risks creating a genuine social tragedy. The ban on internal combustion engines, desired by the Green Deal in just a few years, will affect families, territories, workers and the automotive industry, requiring massive public and private investments.
     I want to express in this Assembly all my concern about the fact that, in the face of early political evaluations, the economic, industrial, social and environmental costs of the transition have been undervalued. In addition to being prohibitive for most European citizens, electric vehicles are not entirely zero-emission. Furthermore, serious questions need to be asked about our power grids and the scarce recharging infrastructure currently in existence.
     Once again, if the course is not reversed and the issue of climate neutrality is not addressed with a bit of healthy realism, it will be families and businesses that pay for the myopia of European bureaucrats."};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned about electric vehicles:

1. Electric vehicles are not entirely zero-emission.
2. The transition to electric vehicles may be prohibitive for most European citizens.

These two points highlight some concerns or limitations related to electric vehicles that the speaker wants to bring attention to in the context of the Green Deal's plan to ban internal combustion engines and achieve climate neutrality."};0;0;0;1;1;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2023-02-14_3-53";"Eugen Jurzyca";"ECR";"
    Dear Mr. President, the fight against climate change is the biggest project of humanity financed from public funds. Therefore, we must above all strive for its effectiveness. Reducing greenhouse gas emissions is an excellent goal, but achieving it through electromobility would be quite expensive compared to other alternative solutions. And that's why I cannot agree with the proposal to ban in the entire Union within a relatively short time frame selling new cars with internal combustion engines.
    
    While removing one ton of CO2 through the emissions trading system costs less than 100 euros, switching to electric vehicles can cost ten times as much. Let's reduce emissions, but where it is most effective."};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned related to electric vehicles:

1. Reducing greenhouse gas emissions through electromobility (electric vehicles) would be quite expensive compared to other alternative solutions.
2. Switching to electric vehicles can cost ten times as much as removing one ton of CO2 through the emissions trading system, which costs less than 100 euros.

In summary, the speaker is expressing concerns about the high cost of transitioning to electric vehicles and suggesting that there may be more effective and affordable ways to reduce greenhouse gas emissions."};0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2023-02-14_3-54";"Radan Kanev";"EPP";" – Mr President, I do believe electric vehicles are the future of mobility. And I am no fan of combustion. Living in a city with detrimental air-quality problems. And furthermore, in my home country, Bulgaria, we produce no internal combustion engines and we have a strong automotive industry which might hugely benefit from a deep transformation of mobility markets. And, however, I will not vote for a total administrative ban of internal combustion engines. I will not do it because I believe administrative bans will not lead to the transformation that we want. And quite on the contrary, I am very much afraid that an administrative ban will lead to a lazy and expensive electric vehicle industry in Europe, exactly the contrary of what we aim. 
I must very much remind you that we did not leave the Stone Age because we run out of stones. But also we didn't leave the Stone Age because we administratively banned the use of stone for industrial purposes. It was always technology, initiative and competition that drove us ahead. I believe we will live in the climate-neutral and combustion-neutral society without burning fossil fuels for our mobility, but not through administrative bans. "};"According to the speech, the speaker believes that:

* Electric vehicles are the future of mobility.
* They would benefit the automotive industry in Bulgaria, where no internal combustion engines are produced.

The speaker also expresses concerns about administrative bans on internal combustion engines, stating that they might lead to a ""lazy and expensive electric vehicle industry"" in Europe. Instead, the speaker suggests that technology, initiative, and competition will drive progress towards a climate-neutral and combustion-neutral society without fossil fuels for mobility."};0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2023-02-14_3-58";"Angel Dzhambazki";"ECR";"
    Mr. Chairman, This dossier is, in a sense, scandalous. It's completely about that. As the shadow rapporteur for the Committee on Transport and Tourism, I must point out that there is no better metaphor for this legislative report on the war against ordinary people, which the ""green"" lobbyists in this hall organize and lead. Can anyone here say what the carbon footprint is, what the damage to the environment is that it costs to produce an electric car? How many hours of child labor, how many hours of slave labor go into producing batteries for electric cars? Of course, no one here will say these things because they don't fit, they don't fit your idea of ""green"" lobbying. The adoption of this law will lead to the end of personal mobility. This is a report aimed at the ordinary citizen, against the person who wants to own a car, who can afford it, who wants to travel, who wants to drive their family. And my question to the socialists is: how can you be socialists when you suppress and wage war so much against ordinary people, against the poor people?"};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned related to electric vehicles:

1. The production of an electric car has a significant carbon footprint and causes environmental damage.
2. The production of batteries for electric cars involves child labor and slave labor.

These points are presented as criticisms of the ""green"" lobbyists and their efforts to promote electric vehicles."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;
"2023-02-14_3-60";"Achille Variati";"S&D";" – Mr. President, honorable colleagues, Commissioner, the regulation we are about to vote on today represents a historic milestone for sustainable mobility in the EU.
    Setting the ambition that new cars and light vehicles sold in the EU will no longer produce CO2 emissions by 2035 is a challenge without precedent. A challenge that will be given an important boost by the new battery regulation, which I hope can be adopted by June, where we define sustainability criteria for electric vehicle batteries, according to estimates, which will represent the predominant technology on the market.
    To conclude, tomorrow the Commission will present a proposal to revise CO2 targets for trucks, which I hope can be adopted during this legislature, so as to reaffirm the EU's climate neutrality goal by 2050.
(The speaker agrees to respond to an ""intervention blue card"")"};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned related to electric vehicles:

1. The new battery regulation will define sustainability criteria for electric vehicle batteries.
2. According to estimates, electric vehicle batteries will represent the predominant technology on the market.

That's all the information provided in the text about electric vehicles."};0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2023-02-14_3-64";"Paolo Borchia";"ID";" - Mr. President, esteemed colleagues, Commissioner, I would like to apologize, but I agree with very little of what I heard today. Let's try to think about the future and imagine two scenarios: in the first, the electric car will be a luxury item, expensive, within reach of few, in the other, it will continue to be mass-market, but Chinese automakers will replace poor European producers. Is this science fiction? No, it is not science fiction if we realize it, if we look at the numbers and see that BYD, the giant Chinese electric car company, in 2022 doubled its market share.
    Meanwhile, to try to maintain competitiveness, the European industry is looking around because here we are at risk of delocalization which means unemployment. We are among those who pollute less, but it seems that far too often, too much, in this Hall efforts are made to create more and more difficulties for Europeans. We work, Commissioner, to pollute less, it is right to do so, but not in this way."};"According to the speech, two possible scenarios for the future of electric cars are presented:

1. In one scenario, electric cars will remain a luxury item, expensive and only accessible to a few people.
2. In another scenario, electric cars will continue to be mass-market, but Chinese automakers (specifically BYD) will replace poor European producers.

The speaker also mentions that BYD, the giant Chinese electric car company, doubled its market share in 2022, which is not science fiction if one looks at the numbers. The speaker implies that this could lead to delocalization and unemployment in the European industry as it tries to maintain competitiveness."};0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;
"2023-02-14_3-65";"Johan Nissinen";"ECR";"
    Mr. Speaker! My current energy crisis wants the EU to ban combustion engines in order to promote electric cars. But is it really climate-smart? No, absolutely not. The Ukrainian war has led to a renaissance of coal power that produces electricity for Europe's electric cars. Or should we call them coal cars because that's the right name? It can't be much dirtier than that.
    In addition, there is also the expensive and carbon dioxide-intensive production of batteries with many parts from China. Instead of having to import oil from Saudi Arabia or gas from Russia, we are getting into a dependence on China instead. Is that really the lesson we should learn from the war in Ukraine?
    The climate alarmism that prevails does not help the climate. We do not need more regulations and we do not need more fear. What we need is more research, market economy, and future optimism."};"According to the speech, the speaker argues that promoting electric cars (also referred to as ""coal cars"" due to the production of electricity for them coming from coal power) is not climate-smart. The reason given is that the Ukrainian war has led to a renaissance of coal power in Europe, which produces electricity for electric cars.

Additionally, the speaker mentions that the production of batteries for electric vehicles is expensive and carbon dioxide-intensive, with many parts coming from China. This is presented as a concern, as it would lead to dependence on China instead of importing oil or gas from other countries (Saudi Arabia or Russia)."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;1;1;0;0;0;0;
"2023-02-14_3-69";"Sunčana Glavak";"EPP";"
    Dear Chairman, ladies and gentlemen, the diversity of technology - yes, the transformation of the sector - yes. However, prohibitions - no. This is not a good way we have started.
    
    I come from Croatia, where Rimac Nevera, the fastest electric car in the world, is also from. You may already have heard about it. However, if we want to reduce CO2 emissions for new cars and combustion engines so that the automotive sector contributes to climate goals that we have, then we need to find a solution, and for me, this is not the right time.
    
    The targets for reducing CO2 emissions for 2030 are being increased, and a new goal of 100% for 2035 has been set. This means that all cars and combustion engines that will be put on the market from 2035 must be zero-emission vehicles.
    
    However, we must bear in mind that the automotive industry of the European Union is responsible for more than 7% of GDP and provides almost 13 million jobs. We must ensure that new regulations do not jeopardize jobs and do not limit the potential for innovations to contribute to our economy. Ultimately, the focus must be on our citizens.
    
    For some areas that are not well connected in terms of traffic, owning a personal car is not a luxury, ladies and gentlemen, but a minimum standard of living. Therefore, we should develop broad programs to support our citizens in purchasing environmentally friendly vehicles. However, we must take into account financial possibilities.
    
    Do we have the infrastructure? Do we have the resources? Regardless of optimistic macroeconomic indicators, we should not expose people to poverty."};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned related to electric vehicles:

1. The speaker mentions that Rimac Nevera, an electric car, is from Croatia and is the fastest electric car in the world.
2. The goal of reducing CO2 emissions for new cars and combustion engines by 2030 has been set, with a target of 100% zero-emission vehicles by 2035.
3. It is mentioned that owning a personal car can be a minimum standard of living for some people, especially in areas not well connected in terms of traffic.
4. The speaker suggests developing broad programs to support citizens in purchasing environmentally friendly vehicles, including electric vehicles.

Overall, the speech highlights the importance of reducing CO2 emissions and promoting the adoption of electric vehicles as a key step towards achieving climate goals, while also acknowledging the need to consider financial possibilities and infrastructure development for widespread adoption."};0;1;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;
"2023-02-14_3-70";"Eric Andrieu";"S&D";"
    Mr. President, Mr. Timmermans, when the wise man shows the stars, the fool looks at the finger.
    Green Pact, strategy ""From the farm to the table"", strategy in favor of biodiversity: so many hated projects today, still, by some ultra-conservatives, neoliberals or climate skeptics - in our century! - and feared by others, but which remain none the less European priority and urgent projects. Missions that, in the light of the degradation of our environment and biodiversity, are vital for the future of our European citizens.
    In this context, establishing as a target 100% of zero-emission vehicles by 2035 is a historic, ambitious and, in my opinion, a true decision, taken in the general interest. Of course, we will have to go beyond electric, but we are talking about 2035 and I would like to say here that I think we should indeed take advantage of this to rethink the place of the car and more broadly the question of mobility.
    But today, it is a first step for 2035 and this vote is essential for the future of our European citizens."};"According to the speech, the following point related to electric vehicles is mentioned:

* Establishing a target of 100% zero-emission vehicles by 2035.

Additionally, it is mentioned that ""we will have to go beyond electric"" but this is not a criticism or a limitation, rather an acknowledgement that there are other aspects to consider in rethinking the place of the car and mobility."};0;0;1;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2023-02-14_3-71";"Claudia Gamon";"Renew";"
    Mr. President! Traffic is one of the major emission problems of the European Union. We need a real traffic turnaround in the European Union. Of course, this also means that we have to move goods and people onto the rails, but today we are talking about individual traffic.
    People, as usual, are further ahead than politics. While new registrations for electric cars in Germany last year increased by 32%, those for diesel and petrol have strongly decreased. And Vice President Timmermans has actually said it right at the beginning: The industrial revolution is happening whether we like it or not.
    What is crucial for Europe is: Do we want to be part of this? Do we want to shape it? Do we also want to create prosperity for our continent, or will we not be there again? We miss it, Europe will become a large open-air museum for tourists from all over the world.
    This law is an essential step in the right direction, a clarification for our citizens and our industry towards a sustainable traffic turnaround."};"According to the speech, new registrations for electric cars in Germany increased by 32% last year, while registrations for diesel and petrol cars have strongly decreased. This suggests that there is growing demand for electric vehicles in Germany."};0;0;1;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2023-02-14_3-72";"Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska";"EPP";" – Madam President! I would like to ask a question, who benefits from Europe's dependence on China, from Chinese production, from Europe's dependence on rare metals, mostly mined in countries with very unstable political situations?
    
    Another question can be asked: do politicians in the United States or Switzerland have less knowledge and a different view on environmental protection because they don't want to impose such wonderful solutions like electric cars on their companies and their society?
    
    We all are aware of how important it is to limit CO2 emissions, how important it is to achieve climate neutrality. We are all for introducing measures that will enable us to take this path and achieve the goal, but I also believe that this should be done in a realistic, neutral way from a technological point of view and socially responsible way.
    
    Today we have a question: can European society afford electric cars? No, please! Do we have a sufficient network of charging stations powered by green energy? No, please! And finally, I, who am asking this question, also asked about it in the transport commission, do we have honest data that tells us what is the CO2 emissions in the entire process of producing, utilizing electric cars?
    We don't have this information, so I ask you, I will not approve this report."};"The speaker mentions electric vehicles (EVs) in two specific points:

1. The speaker questions whether politicians in the United States or Switzerland have less knowledge and a different view on environmental protection because they don't want to impose ""wonderful solutions like electric cars"" on their companies and society.
2. The speaker asks if European society can afford electric cars, implying that there may be concerns about the cost of EVs. They also mention that there is no sufficient network of charging stations powered by green energy.

The speaker does not provide any positive or enthusiastic comments about electric vehicles, but rather raises questions and concerns about their feasibility and practicality in Europe."};0;0;0;0;1;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;
"2023-02-14_3-73";"Robert Hajšel";"S&D";"
    Dear Mr. Chairman, (inappropriate words) that emissions from transport have increased by almost half since 1990 according to Eurostat. The automotive industry today depends on imports of chips from Taiwan, batteries from China, cobalt and lithium from other third countries. If we want to be a true leader in the transition to electromobility, we must strengthen our resilience and strategic autonomy. Otherwise, we leave global players like China, Japan or the USA to take this leadership and only replace one dependence with another.
    
    My native country Slovakia is today, considering one inhabitant, the largest automobile producer in the world. The ambitious transition to the production of electric cars by 2035 will be a great challenge not only for large car manufacturers but especially for much more vulnerable suppliers who are now mainly focused on producing cars with internal combustion engines. This transition will require massive investments, re-qualification and sustainable business plans and must be implemented already in this ten-year period, which is of course influenced by the war in Ukraine and the increasing energy prices.
    
    I believe, however, that by 2035, thanks to our work, we will be in a situation where, thanks to appropriate measures, thanks to new technologies, electric cars will be able to afford everyone who needs them, not just people with higher incomes."};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned related to electric vehicles:

1. The speaker emphasizes the importance of strengthening resilience and strategic autonomy in order to be a leader in the transition to electromobility.
2. Slovakia is considering transitioning to producing electric cars by 2035, which will be a great challenge for both large car manufacturers and smaller suppliers who currently focus on producing cars with internal combustion engines.
3. The speaker believes that by 2035, thanks to new technologies and appropriate measures, electric cars will be affordable for everyone who needs them, not just people with higher incomes.

Overall, the speech highlights the need for Slovakia to take a leading role in the transition to electromobility and emphasizes the challenges and opportunities that come with this transition."};0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;1;0;
"2023-02-14_3-77";"Tudor Ciuhodaru";"S&D";"
    Mr. President, Mr. Vice-President, dear colleagues, the health of European citizens has always been and will always be a priority for me. I am a doctor, a doctor at the Nicolae Oblu Emergency Clinic Hospital in Iasi, Romania, and I treat patients affected by pollution every day, this pathology that reduces life expectancy and affects the quality of life in all European countries.
    From my point of view, any step taken to reduce pollution is extremely important and I will always support any measure that includes stimulating production and purchasing electric cars in member states, often inaccessible, rethinking, if you want, the hybrid vehicle clause, rethinking the second-hand market so that our lives are protected.
    If I were to paraphrase the first man on the Moon today, I could say that, from a legislative point of view, today is a small step for the European Parliament, a small step for the European Commission, but a giant leap for European citizens."};"According to the speech, the speaker supports any measure that includes:

* Stimulating production of electric cars in member states
* Stimulating purchasing of electric cars in member states

The speaker also mentions rethinking the hybrid vehicle clause and the second-hand market, but only in relation to promoting electric vehicles."};0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2023-02-14_3-78";"Brando Benifei";"S&D";" - Mr. President, esteemed colleagues, Vice-President Timmermans, with the regulation on CO2 emissions for cars and vans, the Union equips itself with an essential tool to achieve the decarbonization objectives of the European climate law, a strategic legal text that will lay the foundations for a future-oriented industrial policy.
    Anyone who opposes this, thinking they can slow down change, is only harming the economy and workers. As the Italian right here in the European Parliament will vote against, but then the representatives of our government in the Council voted in favor. The reason is clear: to confuse the waters and avoid their responsibilities in the face of such an important choice.
    The agreement found maintains a technologically neutral approach and a strong social imprint to ensure investments for a fair transition, two key points to allow industry to remain competitive compared to American and Asian producers, who are already well ahead in the zero-emission vehicle market.
    Voting against today means making citizens pay a very high price. Let's commit instead to a truly equal and sustainable transition socially and ecologically."};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned related to electric vehicles:

* The agreement on CO2 emissions for cars and vans aims to promote a ""zero-emission vehicle market"".
* American and Asian producers are already ahead in this market.
* The technologically neutral approach ensures that industry can remain competitive compared to these producers.

In summary, the text mentions that the regulation aims to promote electric vehicles (zero-emission vehicles) and notes that other countries (American and Asian producers) are already leading in this area."};0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;1;0;
"2023-02-14_3-80";"Mick Wallace";"The Left";" – Mr President, sometimes I think that this is the place where ambition comes to die.
So in the trilogue agreement we have 55% reduction for cars, 50 for vans. Now, in fairness to Jan, the rapporteur, he fought for 70% at the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety, but some of his own Renew members even voted against him.
We need an EU-wide phase-out date for sales of new internal combustion-engine cars and vans as close to 2030 as possible, but surely no later than 2035, to meet the EU’s 2050 climate neutrality target. At least that 2035 phase-out date has been retained in the trilogue agreement. But it’s also crucial to remember that unless consumption and mobility habits change radically, replacing the world’s estimated fleet of two billion cars is going to require an explosive and entirely unsustainable increase in resource extraction.
So cars are not the future of transport. Better public transport and active travel are the future, with targeted support where necessary for EVs in rural areas. Sometimes, Commissioner, I feel sorry for you. It’s not easy."};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned related to electric vehicles (EVs):

* Targeted support for EVs is necessary in rural areas.
* The speaker suggests that cars are not the future of transport, implying that alternative modes of transportation such as public transport and active travel should be prioritized.
* No specific details or statistics about EVs themselves are mentioned.

The speaker's tone is critical towards the current state of affairs and emphasizes the need for a radical change in consumption and mobility habits."};0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;
"2023-02-14_3-85";"Benoît Lutgen";"EPP";"
    In writing. - The dogmatic decision to only allow electric vehicles by 2035 is harmful for sustainable development. This decision does not take into account environmental, economic, and social aspects. Mining for minerals for batteries has disastrous environmental and human consequences in Africa. Moreover, what about electricity production? Today, there isn't enough electricity, and too much electricity produced by coal or gas. Finally, the calculation of CO2 emissions is based only on car usage, not the entire production cycle (car, battery, recycling). If we look at everything, the balance is bad. Allowing a 10% threshold for other types of cars would have allowed the automotive industry to become a leader in innovative markets, such as e-fuel. The decision made will also create difficulties for rural areas due to the insufficient charging station network, even considering future prospects. My country does not reach the milestones set by Europe. Europe shoots itself in the foot, jeopardizing its competitiveness, employment, and sovereignty by reinforcing its dependence on China. A very bad decision on which, I am sure, we will come back."};"According to the speech, the decision to only allow electric vehicles by 2035 is considered harmful for sustainable development. The speaker argues that this decision does not take into account environmental, economic, and social aspects.

Specifically, the speaker mentions:

* Mining for minerals for batteries has disastrous environmental and human consequences in Africa.
* Electricity production is a concern, as there isn't enough electricity currently, and too much electricity is produced by coal or gas.
* The calculation of CO2 emissions only considers car usage, not the entire production cycle (car, battery, recycling), which means that the balance is bad.

The speaker also suggests that allowing a 10% threshold for other types of cars would have allowed the automotive industry to become a leader in innovative markets, such as e-fuel."};0;0;0;0;1;0;1;0;1;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2023-02-14_3-86";"Tom Vandenkendelaere";"EPP";"
    In writing. – The European Parliament voted on the agreement on new reduction targets for CO2 emissions from cars and vans. This file is part of the European Green Deal to make the green transition in Europe possible. With this ""Fit for 55"" agreement, the way to a climate-neutral Europe will soon become visible at our doorstep. An agreement had already been found between the European Parliament, the European Commission and the member states in October 2022, and now this agreement was confirmed in the plenary vote.
    
    Concretely, the new legislation sets a reduction target of 100% by 2035. This means that new cars and vans sold in the EU will no longer be allowed to run on fossil fuel engines from then on. Flanders has more ambitious targets. According to the Flemish climate plan, the phasing out begins in 2029. This is one of our main levers to reduce CO2 emissions and make electric cars more affordable. That is why CD&V supports this legislation."};"According to the text, it is mentioned that with the new ""Fit for 55"" agreement, new cars and vans sold in the EU will no longer be allowed to run on fossil fuel engines from 2035 onwards. This implies that electric vehicles (EVs) or alternative fuel-powered vehicles will become the norm by then.

Additionally, it is mentioned that Flanders has more ambitious targets, with a plan to phase out fossil fuel engines as early as 2029. The text also states that this is one of the main levers to reduce CO2 emissions and make electric cars more affordable, which suggests that the Flemish climate plan aims to promote the adoption of electric vehicles.

Overall, the text highlights the increasing importance of electric vehicles in reducing CO2 emissions and achieving a climate-neutral Europe."};0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2023-02-15_4-5";"Iratxe García Pérez";"S&D";"
    On behalf of the S&D Group. - Madam President, dear colleagues, the race for subsidies has begun. The United States, China, Japan, or India are in the same competition. It is positive that allied countries like the United States bet on the transition to a world without emissions. But the European Union cannot allow unfair paths and violations of the rules of the World Trade Organization.
    
    The time has come to react. We have fallen behind in sectors such as microchip manufacturing or the digital world. None of the giants of the digital world or the major social networks are European. The Industrial Plan of the Green Pact presented by the European Commission cannot be a missed opportunity. Its current presentation ignores the rights of the working class and its financing is in limbo.
    
    We must take advantage of the decisive moment of the green and digital revolution to modernize our economy. What is most urgent is a reform of the electricity market, because its current design is the main disadvantage of the European industry.
    
    We also need a review of the public aid model for businesses that allows for accelerated deployment of strategic projects within the framework of national recovery plans and in sectors that guarantee greater strategic, technological, and energy autonomy, such as clean energies, semiconductors, and electric vehicles.
    
    But the review of state aid not only requires a modification of thresholds, but also an instrument that balances the differences in size and fiscal margin of the Member States. Under no circumstances can we allow the global race for subsidies to become an internal race between Member States that fragments our single market.
    
    Another step must be the adoption of green financing to mobilize the necessary public and private investment. Support for national budgets can be granted with appropriate tax rules in a renewed Stability and Growth Pact through the mobilization of a financial instrument inspired by the SURE program.
    
    The Green Industrial Plan will only become a reality if it protects the heart that has pumped the European industry for two centuries: the working class. Without workers and workers, there is no industry. Any business receiving public aid must promote labor rights, decent wages, dignified working conditions, collective bargaining, and trade union rights.
    
    Ladies and gentlemen, the priority objective of the Green Industrial Plan of the Pact must be to compete effectively with the United States and China, not between Member States within the single market. And there is no better way to commemorate the thirtieth anniversary of the single market than to contribute to the birth of a competitive, sustainable, digital European industry that respects the dignity of the working class that deserves it."};"According to the speech, electric vehicles are mentioned as one of the sectors that guarantee greater strategic, technological, and energy autonomy. The speaker suggests reviewing the public aid model for businesses that allows for accelerated deployment of strategic projects within the framework of national recovery plans and in sectors such as clean energies, semiconductors, and electric vehicles.

In other words, the speech is proposing to provide support and funding for the development and deployment of electric vehicles as part of a broader strategy to promote sustainable energy and technological autonomy."};0;1;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2023-02-15_4-10";"Martin Schirdewan";"The Left";"
    On behalf of the Fraktion The Left. - Madam President! The Inflation Reduction Act is a nightmare for all European transatlanticists. Joe Biden relies on protectionism and America first, and his IRA is an attack on the industrial basis in the EU and thus the economic future capability because he actively aims to attract industrial production through aggressive tax dumping from Europe to the USA. And all that the conservatives - as heard in the debate - can think of is to demand more free trade, which in this context - pardon my French - is really a big bullshit.
    Instead, there now needs a radical change in European industrial policy. The outdated investment brake - that is the old debts and deficit rules - must finally end. We need a reform of state aid law and competition law. Future investments and public welfare must not be deprived of air again. Our people need public investments in good jobs, an industry that is future-proof and clean. Our people want clean electricity and heat, a functioning, sustainable transport system, and our people have a right to good education and health care. In short: We need an industrial policy for the 99%.
    The Commission has reacted almost panic-stricken to the attack from the USA. But, Madam Commissioner, what you present here is not all over. Biden's IRA is a massive investment program, whose financing is based on taxing multinationals and closing tax loopholes for companies. Redistribution from above to below, to invest in a sustainable future - that is the right way, also for the EU.
    And at the same time, the subsidies must be linked to social conditions such as adequate remuneration, the number of training places, and the promotion of trade union organizations. The protection of our workers and climate protection are not a contradiction, they go hand in hand."};"The text does not mention electric vehicles explicitly. However, it mentions ""clean electricity"" as one of the things that the people want. This could be interpreted as including electric vehicles, but it is not directly mentioned.

The closest reference to electric vehicles is when the speaker says ""a functioning, sustainable transport system"". This phrase could include electric vehicles, public transportation, and other forms of sustainable transportation, but it does not specifically mention them."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2023-02-15_11-6";"Nicolas Bay";"NI";"
    Mr. President, dear colleagues, for years, we have allowed the whole world to benefit from our subsidies in the name of the fight against climate change. Foreign companies have enriched themselves with our money.
    Today, the United States supports its electric car industry, exclusively subsidizes American companies, and thus excludes ours. This is an act of commercial warfare.
    And you discover, with astonishing candor, that all countries in the world defend their interests first! China massively subsidizes its economy - and by the way, it has been cheating for decades. The United States protects itself, has no complexes, and - to be honest - they are completely right.
    So let's stop asking for additional gestures from Joe Biden. We must respond and finally stop being the best students of global free trade. Facilitating state aid by subsidizing our economy is a first step, but we have to go much further: establish, whenever possible, real local, national, and European preferences in public procurement. Support tax breaks to improve competitiveness. Let's stop signing free trade agreements with the whole world once and for all. This killed our industry yesterday, it will kill our agriculture tomorrow.
    It is time for the European Union to protect us instead of organizing our collective impotence."};"According to the speech, the United States supports its electric car industry exclusively by subsidizing American companies, which excludes foreign companies from benefiting from these subsidies. This is described as an ""act of commercial warfare"". That's the only mention of electric vehicles in the text."};0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;
"2023-02-15_17-14";"Sara Matthieu";"Greens/EFA";" – Chairman, colleagues, we must move much faster towards 100% renewable energy and electric cars. Of course, for the climate, but also to reduce our dependence on rogue states like Russia. But to produce those solar panels, wind turbines, and batteries, we need critical raw materials, and we don't have enough or in limited quantities in Europe.
    We must absolutely avoid a new dependency on authoritarian regimes such as China. Therefore, we must handle our raw materials much more efficiently and better, for example by ensuring that our products last longer and by 100% reusing and recycling our batteries and devices. This way, we keep those raw materials in Europe and create many new jobs in the circular economy.
    A new raw materials rush or a new trade policy in that direction is not a solution. On the contrary. Circularity, that is the future for our economy, but also for our autonomy."};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned related to electric vehicles:

1. The speaker advocates for moving towards 100% renewable energy and electric cars.
2. This is mentioned as a way to reduce dependence on rogue states like Russia.

That's all that is said about electric vehicles in the text."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;1;
"2023-02-15_17-15";"Alessandro Panza";"ID";"
    – Madam President, esteemed colleagues, Madam Commissioner, I am happy that this debate is taking place because finally the issue of rare earths will expose the shallowness of European energy policy, all the hypocrisy of the Commission and all the myopia with which you claim to save the world without realizing that you are massacring it by imposing a sustainability model that is not sustainable at all.
    And yes, because while you force us to buy electric cars, which contain between nine and eleven pounds of rare earths, which in their production cycle consume, according to researchers from the University of California, three to four times the energy necessary for an internal combustion engine, you do not take into account the consequences of these choices. What are they? For example, the environmental consequences. To obtain one pound of gallium, 50 tons of rock are needed, and up to 200 pounds of luteum, processes that occur with the consumption of thousands of cubic meters of water, sulfuric and nitric acids, then discharged onto the land or into the sea.
    Sustaining the change in our energy model requires doubling the production of rare metals every fifteen years or so, and over the next thirty years it will be necessary to extract more minerals than all of humanity has extracted in the last 70,000 years, and some may already be on the verge of exhaustion within the next four or five years.
    Not to mention the geopolitical consequences. Some of these metals, which are essential for the production of communication systems, weapons, and everyday goods, are in 90-95% in the availability of only China and the rest in countries allied with it, putting Europe in a worse dependency situation than that from Russian gas.
    The reality is that your environmental ideologies are based on lies and omissions. Yes, because Germany, Sweden, France, and many other European countries have rare earth deposits, but they do not extract them because they pollute and therefore have decided to outsource the environmental impact and pollution from extraction to poor countries, ready to sacrifice their environment to enrich themselves, without considering that the consequences, in any case, will be paid by all.
    On rare earths, which are always talked about too little, the end of European leadership will probably be consumed, but someone will be happy because even if we have a poorer continent, we will have reached climate neutrality, but once again at the expense of citizens who can do nothing about it."};"According to the speech, electric cars contain between 9 and 11 pounds of rare earths. Additionally, researchers from the University of California have found that the production cycle of these electric cars consumes three to four times more energy than an internal combustion engine. This is mentioned as a criticism of the European Commission's policy on sustainability, implying that the environmental impact of producing electric vehicles has not been fully considered."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;1;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;
"2023-02-15_17-34";"Josianne Cutajar";"S&D";"
    The past is haunted by the success of environmental and digital ambitions on the efficiency of our energy supply. While we continue to demand more energy and technology, we must not forget that raw materials are essential commodities for our economy and the resilience of the European Union.

    Countries like the United States, Japan, and Korea have invested in improving their dependence on these primary materials from the same sources. The industrial strategy of the European Union should be a model of our autonomy, which will define affordable, sustainable energy sources, to ensure the security of supply, diversification of them, new use, and recycling. However, European policy must also prioritize the security of raw material supplies over used batteries and magnets in electric vehicles, as there is still much research to be done on alternative sources of these materials that can supply our societies and economies directly."};"According to the speech, it is mentioned that ""used batteries and magnets"" from electric vehicles are considered as raw materials that need to be prioritized in terms of security of supply. The speaker suggests that there is still much research needed on alternative sources of these materials (batteries and magnets) that can directly supply our societies and economies."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;1;
"2023-02-15_17-46";"Miriam Lexmann";"EPP";" – Madam President, critical raw materials are essential for the deployment of the technologies that enable green and digital transitions and for building the economy of the future. This is why the upcoming CRM Act must not only be ambitious, but also in line with our industrial strategy and broader supply chain diversification. Today, the totalitarian regime of the Chinese Communist Party controls roughly 60 % of the world's production of rare earth minerals and materials. Those resources include lithium, cobalt and other elements crucial for making electric vehicles, batteries or semiconductors. 
I am glad that the Union finally woke up to the need to diversify our supply chains. We need to use global gateway and other opportunities to invest and work with our allies to access critical raw materials. But we need to also ensure that this diversification does not lead to new dependencies and human rights breaches. "};"According to the speech, rare earth minerals and materials are crucial for making electric vehicles. Specifically, lithium and cobalt are mentioned as elements necessary for producing electric vehicles. This is stated in the following sentence:

""Those resources include lithium, cobalt and other elements crucial for making electric vehicles, batteries or semiconductors.""

In summary, the text mentions that rare earth minerals and materials, including lithium and cobalt, are essential components for the production of electric vehicles."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;
"2023-03-13_13-27";"Markus Buchheit";"ID";"
    Madam President, dear ladies and gentlemen! The proposal on building energy efficiency proves that there is no hiding place from the ideas of Brussels' world improvers. So now the detached house, the last refuge from gender and climate chaos, must also join in. From 2028, EU-wide there should be an obligation to install photovoltaic systems in all new buildings, from 2032 in all houses. Public buildings should already be emissions-free by 2027. 15% of parking spaces should be reserved for bicycles, with a charging station for electric cars built for every five parking spaces.
    In the next ten years, alone in Germany, 16 million houses must be equipped with new facade insulation, roofs, windows and heating systems. Long live emissions-free living in the thermos flask - mold and fire protection problems included! The whole thing is to be garnished with state compulsion for implementation, as well as subsidies amounting to 150 billion euros. At least that should be enough for an isolated window insulation."};"According to the speech, it is mentioned that:

* 15% of parking spaces should be reserved for bicycles.
* A charging station for electric cars should be built for every five parking spaces.

This means that the proposal aims to promote the use of electric vehicles by providing dedicated parking spaces and charging infrastructure."};0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;
"2023-03-13_13-55";"Mihai Tudose";"S&D";"
    In writing. - I support the objectives of the new legislation proposed by the European Commission, but I do not approve the terms for implementing minimum performance standards in energy. Assistance against energy poverty, supporting campaigns to renovate buildings and introducing performance energy standards are absolutely necessary in the European Union, given that buildings consume 40% of EU energy and almost 75% of the current European real estate park is inefficient in terms of energy.
    However, I consider unrealistic the obligation introduced for European citizens for their homes to reach at least class E performance level by 2030 and at least class D performance level by 2033. Once again, the European Commission sets unsustainable deadlines, just like for switching to electric cars or abandoning natural gas. I note with regret, both the excessive regulation of the European Commission and its disconnection from citizens' agenda.
    I hope that the negotiation with the Council will lead to adjusting this legislative reform, whose purpose must, in fact, be to support citizens and not to further burden them, in a social and energetic context already so tense."};"According to the speech, it is mentioned that the European Commission sets an unsustainable deadline for switching to electric cars. This is stated as an example of the excessive regulation and disconnection from citizens' agenda by the European Commission. No further details or information about electric vehicles are provided in the text."};0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;
"2023-03-13_15-19";"Radan Kanev";"EPP";"
    Madam President, Mr Vice-President, colleagues, there is a paradox and it is that the success of European climate policy will not be measured in percentages - neither 50, nor 55, nor 57, nor up to 2030, nor up to 2032. It will be measured in economic efficiency - the success that this policy can achieve, making it attractive for the whole world and truly helping us in our fight against climate change.
    
    And here we face a very simple test that we are faced with. First, we need to see if this policy can be attractive for poorer, economically lagging states within our Union itself. This will be the test that determines its final success. And here I must say that I am an optimist. There are huge opportunities for economic development in Central and Eastern Europe, based on the European climate law. We have huge opportunities for the extraction of critical materials, for battery production, for hydrogen production, and not just for the production of energy from renewable sources, but for the return of production itself of renewable energy sources in the European continent. We have a significant potential in work on electric motors, so as not to talk again and again that electric cars will be imported into Europe in the future. But here I want to point out something in reverse. So far, my country Bulgaria has reduced greenhouse gas emissions by over 40% compared to the 90s, but not thanks to modern technological development, but due to deindustrialization. And here, in particular, for effort sharing regulation, we need to be very careful and carefully assess whether it is really fair and whether it is attractive and opens up opportunities for countries like Bulgaria."};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned related to electric vehicles:

1. The speaker mentions that there is a significant potential for work on electric motors.
2. They mention that electric cars will not be imported into Europe in the future, implying that they will be produced locally instead.

These two points suggest that the speaker believes there are opportunities for economic development and growth in the production of electric vehicles within the European Union, particularly in Central and Eastern Europe."};0;1;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2023-03-13_15-25";"Michael Bloss";"Greens/EFA";"
    Madam President, dear ladies and gentlemen! The Green Deal is the central legislative package of this parliamentary term. We have promised our female and male voters, our children, and future generations to tackle the climate crisis, meet the climate goals, and uphold the Paris Climate Protection Agreement. We will be measured by this. However, also in this house and especially from the Conservatives, attempts are being made to undermine central elements of the Green Deal.
    If they vote against the end-of-combustion engine, against climate protection in traffic, then they vote against the climate goals. If they vote against renovating houses, then they vote against the climate goals. When it comes to the crunch, one will not run away - free after the motto: Wash my fur, but don't make me wet. The industry wants clear guidelines for the end-of-combustion engine right now.
    One can stick to the past, but the USA and China are overtaking us in terms of industrial policy. The climate industries, solar cells, wind turbines, green steel, and above all electric cars - these are the jobs of tomorrow. Who denies progress fuels deindustrialization. So don't be naive! We must benefit from the boom of the climate industry.
    To the German federal government I say: You are currently behaving like an elephant in a china shop. This endangers how laws are made in Europe. You have voted for the end-of-combustion engine. Stand by your actions. Otherwise, there will be no more holding ground for other countries either. Then everyone will try to grab something at the very end."};"According to the speech, electric cars are mentioned as one of the ""climate industries"" that are considered to be the jobs of tomorrow. The speaker argues that denying progress in this area would fuel deindustrialization. This is presented as a contrast to sticking to the past and being overtaken by other countries like the USA and China in terms of industrial policy.

In summary, electric vehicles are mentioned as an important part of the climate industry, which is expected to create jobs in the future. The speaker emphasizes the importance of embracing progress in this area rather than resisting it."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2023-03-13_15-35";"Zbigniew Kuźmiuk";"ECR";"
    Madam President! Commissioner! The basic objections I would like to raise about this package are primarily that it is largely based on ideology, and regrettably, the merits have been pushed into the background. We are worsening the competitiveness of the European economy, European agriculture, and yet the European Union is only responsible for 7% of global CO2 emissions. The other emitters, especially the main ones, do not particularly care about CO2 emission reduction policies. Moreover, the main beneficiary is the Chinese economy, which has already been mentioned here. China is a leading producer of photovoltaics and electric cars. They are the main beneficiaries of the EU climate policy, while at the same time they are building coal-fired power plants on a massive scale. This cannot be continued.
    
    As for this LULUCF regulation, there are also strong objections. It will hit European livestock farming, and yet SFP is responsible for food safety. It will affect the forestry economy, where 2.5 million workers are employed. This is a dead end, Commissioner."};"According to the speech, China is mentioned as a leading producer of photovoltaics (solar panels) and electric cars. This means that China has a significant presence in the production of renewable energy technologies, including those used in electric vehicles. The speaker also notes that China is building coal-fired power plants on a massive scale, which seems to be in contrast with their role as a leading producer of photovoltaics and electric cars."};0;1;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2023-03-13_15-46";"Frans Timmermans";"NA";" Executive Vice-President of the Commission. – Mr President, honourable Members, very briefly, first of all I need to stress that those who say ‘slow down to save our economy, slow down to save our jobs’ – I think they are wrong. If we want to save our jobs, if we want to save our economy, we actually should be speeding up.
Look at what’s happening globally. Some say, ‘well, look at China – 30% of the emissions, still increasing the emissions’. There’s also another way you could look at China: half of the cars sold in China now are already electric cars. Their investment in renewables is beyond our wildest imagination. Their transition to renewable energy will be very fast. Look at the Inflation Reduction Act in the United States: this will have a huge impact on the transition to a renewable economy.
Honourable Members, we just don’t have the luxury of slowing down. If we really want jobs that are sustainable jobs, future-oriented jobs, if we want our economy to be competitive in the future, this transition needs to happen and it needs to happen now. And I salute the European Parliament, its majority, in seeing the necessity of this and voting on these three proposals tomorrow.
My second point is this: our approach is not an ideological approach. I fear that closing your eyes to science is the ideological approach. Let scientists inform us. Let science guide us. That’s how we should use rational thought in this, not ideology. And the science is crystal clear. I would say the science is also crystal clear on what’s happening in our sinks. And by monitoring what is happening, we can find solutions.
If the European Commission monitors – and I respect Finnish colleagues and Swedish colleagues saying ‘What do you know as a Dutchman about forests? You know every individual tree in the Netherlands by name’, and I respect that – but then at least listen to your own scientists. Let them guide you and let us help you in taking the right decisions. This is my plea. Member States themselves decide, but let the decision be a rational one based on science.
And finally, some of you made remarks about cars. And, here, let me also take away a misunderstanding. Our legislation says there should be no emissions at the tailpipe in 2035. That’s what was agreed between the co-legislators. In my view, that’s technological neutrality. If you can make something that creates propulsion without emissions, you can make the choice yourself. So if in Germany they’re always talking about ‘Verbrenner-Aus’ and all of that, we’re saying ‘no emissions at the tailpipe’, and whatever you can find to have no emissions at the tailpipe is in line with the legislation. Also here, let science and economic logic dictate the choices we need to make."};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned related to electric vehicles:

1. Half of the cars sold in China now are already electric cars.
2. The legislation agreed upon by co-legislators states that there should be no emissions at the tailpipe by 2035.

These two points highlight the growing adoption of electric vehicles in China and the European Union's goal to reduce emissions from vehicles, specifically aiming for zero emissions at the tailpipe by 2035."};0;0;1;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2023-03-14_3-25";"Kim Van Sparrentak";"Greens/EFA";"
    Chairman, if you grind your teeth with a smart toothbrush, those data are not yours but belong to the toothbrush manufacturer. If you want to have your electric car repaired, you must go to the garage of your brand because they cannot access the computer of your car. And your robotic vacuum cleaner collects data about your home all day long, where you are not present. This is pure hunger for data under the guise of innovation. Of course, this is turning the world upside down. The data that you produce should be yours.
    
    Now, this law is a first step in that direction and I am pleased that there are no backdoors for companies to collect even more personal information. Personal data does not belong on a data market. Let's look at the data of businesses, such as in energy consumption or production processes. Here we can learn collectively to make processes more sustainable and find faster solutions to the climate crisis. Let's make this data freely available.
    
    Data can bring us much, but individuals must be able to decide for themselves what they want to share, regardless of which device they purchase."};"According to the speech, if you want to have your electric car repaired, you must go to the garage of your brand because they cannot access the computer of your car. This is mentioned as an example of how companies can control data related to certain devices or products, such as toothbrushes, cars, and vacuum cleaners."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;
"2023-03-15_3-3";"Ursula von der Leyen";"NA";" President of the Commission. – Madam President, dear Roberta, President Michel, cher Charles, honourable Members, last Friday, I met with President Biden in Washington. We had a very good discussion on the Inflation Reduction Act.
There is a striking symmetry between the Inflation Reduction Act and the European Green Deal. Both of them are simultaneously a climate strategy and a strategy for investment and growth. Both of them include funding for just transition. And both include regulatory standards. Only on carbon pricing – a very important instrument – the United States system is still much more limited than ours. In other words, the two biggest and most advanced economies in the world are now moving in the same direction. Therefore, I welcome the Inflation Reduction Act for its massive investment in clean tech. But, you might perhaps recall that, as we discussed already in November, some aspects of the Inflation Reduction Act were of concern to us and needed solutions.
Now, I am happy to report that we have found solutions. On Friday, President Biden and I confirmed the understanding on electric vehicles that allows European carmakers to get access to the US market and thus to US tax breaks. Second, we launched discussions on a critical raw materials agreement. The aim is to ensure that critical raw materials for electric vehicle batteries, whether they are extracted or processed in the European Union, are treated in the same way as if they came from the United States. Thus, this will secure strong supply chains for batteries in Europe and ensure access to the US market. And, my third point, we started a transparency dialogue on incentives for the clean tech industry.
That’s good news overall. But let me be clear: negotiations can only solve some of the most concerning issues. The big bulk of work still lies with us in Europe. We Europeans need to get better at nurturing our own clean tech industry. We need to speed up. We need to simplify procedures. We need to grant better access to public and private finances.
If there’s any doubt, let me give you three figures that underscore why this is so important. The global investment in the clean transition topped USD 1 trillion last year, and that’s 30% more than the year before. If you look at the global market for net-zero technologies, it is set to triple by 2030.
In other words, the race is on: the race on who is going to be dominant in this market in the future. We must get our act together if we want to stay frontrunners. We must nurture our own clean tech industrial base, both to create good, well-paying jobs here in Europe and, of course, to ensure access to the clean solutions we need so urgently.
That’s what the European Green Deal Industrial Plan is all about. The centrepiece of the Green Deal Industrial Plan are two legal acts. One is the Net-Zero Industry Act and the other one is the Critical Raw Materials Act. The Commission is proposing those two legal acts this week, actually tomorrow. Let me reflect on both.
With the Net-Zero Industry Act, we are setting the ambition. By 2030, we want to be able to produce at least 40% of the clean tech that we need here to fulfil our green transition. Therefore, the Net-Zero Industry Act is all about speed, speed and facilitation. We are facilitating permitting. We are working with regulatory sandboxes. We are creating simpler State aid schemes. And we are allowing for tax breaks and the flexible use of EU funds. In short, the Net-Zero Industry Act provides speed, simplification, and it provides funding.
The second centrepiece is the Critical Raw Materials Act, which the College will also adopt tomorrow. This is about securing the supply for critical materials, which are badly needed for the digital and green transition. These minerals, as you know, power phones and electric vehicles, the batteries, the chips, the windmills, the solar panels, you just name it. In other words, we cannot function without critical raw materials. And the demand for critical raw materials will dramatically rise over the next several years and decades.
But – and we’ve discussed that here in the Hemicycle before – as you all know, today, the European Union depends heavily on a few third countries for these strategic raw materials. Just a few examples, and you know plenty of them, we get 98% of our rare earth supply from China, 93% of our magnesium from China, 97% of our lithium from China. And you can continue this list over and over again.
Honourable Members, we know that the pandemic and the war have taught us a bitter lesson about overdependence. So, if we want to be independent, we urgently need to strengthen and diversify our supply chains with like-minded partners.
I was last week also in Canada, and this is a like-minded partner. You can see exemplary European companies there doing just that: diversifying and strengthening our supply chains, for instance, sourcing low-carbon nickel to produce batteries here in the European Union. And Canada is not only a reliable partner, it also shares our values. It guarantees that raw materials are mined with the highest standards for the environment and for workers.
Our critical Raw Materials Act will support these efforts by European companies. We want to extract more ores and minerals here in the European Union. We want to boost our processing capacity to at least 40% of annual consumption. And, of course, we need to recycle more. Again, if I may jump back to Canada, I visited a company that is able to recycle, from old batteries, 95% of the lithium, the cobalt and the nickel. 95%. It’s amazing to see that from old batteries. That’s the future. That’s what we have to have in the European Union.
So weit, meine Damen und Herren Abgeordnete, zu unserer Unterstützung für Clean-Tech-Unternehmen. Doch das Thema der Wettbewerbsfähigkeit ist natürlich viel, viel breiter. Es betrifft unseren Binnenmarkt, und genau damit beschäftigen wir uns mit zwei Mitteilungen, die wir auch morgen veröffentlichen werden. Wir alle wissen, dass der Binnenmarkt die Grundlage unseres Wohlstands und unserer Wettbewerbsfähigkeit ist. Er wird in diesem Jahr 30 Jahre alt, aber das Potenzial, das in diesem Binnenmarkt steckt, ist noch längst nicht ausgeschöpft. Wenn man sich die verschiedenen Studien anschaut, die sich mit dem Binnenmarkt beschäftigen, dann zeigen sie, dass wir mehr als 700 Milliarden freisetzen könnten, wenn wir das gesamte Potenzial des Binnenmarktes ausschöpfen würden.
Das beginnt – Sie kennen die Themen – bei den Kapitalmärkten oder bei Forschung und Entwicklung. Wir wissen, dass wir so stark sind, weil wir stark sind bei Grundlagenforschung, Entwicklung und dann die Marktfähigkeit herstellen. Sie kennen die Beispiele: Die mRNA-Impfstoffe sind hier in Europa entwickelt worden. Mit ihrer Hilfe konnten wir die Pandemie überwinden. Es gibt einen guten Grund, warum diese zukunftsweisende Innovation hier entwickelt worden ist. Oder ein anderes Beispiel aus der Wasserstoffforschung. Es gibt keinen anderen Ort auf der Welt, wo zwischen 2011 und 2020, also in der letzten Dekade, mehr Patente für grünen Wasserstoff angemeldet worden sind als hier bei uns in Europa. Das sind nur zwei Beispiele von ganz vielen. Genau hier müssen wir ansetzen.
In der Tat, wir Europäer haben uns das Ziel gesteckt, bis zum Jahr 2030 3 % unseres Bruttoinlandsproduktes für Forschung und Entwicklung auszugeben. Aber dieses Ziel haben wir schon lange. Das haben wir uns zum ersten Mal 2002 gesteckt. Wenn man sich mal die Geschwindigkeit anschaut, mit der wir uns auf dieses Ziel zubewegen – ja, dann kommen wir näher, aber sehr, sehr langsam. Das reicht auf keinen Fall, und vor allen Dingen sind andere schneller, und andere schlafen auch nicht. Während unsere Ausgaben für Forschung und Entwicklung, wie gesagt, langsam steigen, sehen wir, dass unser Anteil in der Welt an Forschungs- und Entwicklungsausgaben in den letzten 20 Jahren von 41 % auf 31 % gesunken ist.
Ich möchte daher mit dem schwedischen Ratsvorsitz den Staats- und Regierungschefs vorschlagen, dieses gemeinsame europäische Ziel für Forschungsausgaben zu erhöhen und uns hinzusetzen und genau zu schauen, warum die Investition in Innovation, in Forschung und Entwicklung bei uns so langsam geht und wie wir besser werden können. Das ist nicht nur notwendig für Europas Forscherinnen und Forscher, Wissenschaftlerinnen und Wissenschaftler und Unternehmen, sondern es wäre auch ein ganz, ganz starkes Signal, dass wir es wirklich ernst nehmen mit der Wettbewerbsfähigkeit unseres europäischen Binnenmarktes.
(Beifall)
Mein zweiter Punkt betrifft ein Thema, das Sie immer wieder hören: Bürokratie. Es sind Europas Unternehmen und Beschäftigte, die den Binnenmarkt zu einer der attraktivsten Wirtschaftsregionen der Welt machen. Und zwar ganz egal, ob wir von Industrieriesen sprechen, Weltmarktführern, Mittelständlern oder Familienbetrieben – ihr Erfolg ist Europas Erfolg. Daher setzen wir alles daran, ihre Arbeit zu erleichtern. Wir wissen, dass die Qualität der öffentlichen Verwaltung und des Rechtsrahmens entscheidend ist für die Wettbewerbsfähigkeit. Deshalb achten wir auch gemeinsam darauf, mit umfassenden Folgenabschätzungen sicherzustellen, dass Europas Gesetze Europas Unternehmen nicht belasten, sondern unterstützen.
Doch oft ist es, und das wissen wir alle, nicht die einzelne Nachweispflicht. Oft ist es nicht die einzelne Auflage, die ihnen das Leben schwermacht, sondern es ist die Riesensumme des Ganzen. Deshalb werden wir über die Ressortgrenzen hinaus prüfen, was Europas Wettbewerbsfähigkeit wirklich voranbringt und worauf wir verzichten können. Wir werden bis zum Herbst konkrete Vorschläge vorlegen, um Berichtspflichten zu vereinfachen, und zwar um 25 % zu reduzieren. Das ist nicht einfach, aber dieser Anstrengung müssen wir uns unterziehen.
Unsere politischen Prioritäten bleiben bestehen, weil sie richtig sind. Das ist der europäische Grüne Deal, das ist die Digitalisierung, und das ist die geopolitische Resilienz. Wir haben sie gemeinsam vor dreieinhalb Jahren gesetzt, sie haben sich als richtig erwiesen, gerade und auch während dieser Krisenzeiten. Aber wir wollen dafür sorgen, dass ihre Umsetzung mit weniger Kosten verbunden ist, vor allem für unsere Mittelständler. Wir haben ja – wir können es beweisen, denn wir haben ja beim Ausbau der erneuerbaren Energien gezeigt, welche Dynamik wir mit einer gezielten Gesetzgebung für schnellere, flexiblere Genehmigungsverfahren tatsächlich auslösen können. Das sollte also künftig die Regel sein, und es sollte nicht die Ausnahme sein.
Noch ein letzter Punkt: Europas Binnenmarkt ist stark. Wir können stolz darauf sein. Wir müssen alles daransetzen, seine Stärke zu bewahren und auszubauen. Daher sollten uns künftig eine Reihe wichtiger Leistungskennzahlen leiten: die wesentlichen Leistungsindikatoren. Sie können darüber Auskunft geben, ob Europas Wirtschaft tatsächlich wettbewerbsfähiger wird und ob unsere Diskussionen sich in die richtige Richtung entwickeln. Wie entwickelt sich der Anteil privater Investitionen? Wächst die Zahl der Unternehmen mit schnellem Internet? Wie steht es um die Beteiligung Erwachsener an beruflicher Weiterbildung – und so weiter und so fort. Alle diese Daten liegen vor. Wir müssen dazu nichts neu erheben, aber wir machen nichts mit diesen Daten. Anhand dieser Daten und anhand dieser wesentlichen Leistungsindikatoren können wir objektivieren, ob und wie wir uns weiterentwickeln. Das heißt, es sind nicht Vermutungen, sondern man hat konkrete Zahlen, nachweisgestützt. Daher wird die Kommission dem Parlament künftig einmal im Jahr Bericht darüber erstatten, wie sich diese Schlüsselzahlen, diese wesentlichen Leistungsindikatoren weiterentwickeln.
Honourable Members, with the war on our doorstep, with volatile energy prices and massive clean—tech investments worldwide, Europe has to up its game. I am looking forward to develop the proposals we have put on the table today. This is our answer. Long live Europe."};"The text does not mention electric vehicles directly, but it mentions batteries and recycling of materials used in their production. The President of the Commission mentions that a company in Canada can recycle 95% of lithium, cobalt, and nickel from old batteries, which is presented as an example of the future direction for the European Union.

The text does not provide any further information about electric vehicles or their development, but it highlights the importance of recycling and sustainable production of materials used in clean-tech industries."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;1;0;0;0;0;
"2023-03-15_3-4";"Manfred Weber";"EPP";"on behalf of the PPE Group. – Madam President of the European Parliament, Commission, Council, dear colleagues, good politics starts, first of all, with a reality check. Eight out of ten global champions are from the US. Apple’s market value alone is bigger than Germany’s entire stock market. The 10 leading companies investing in quantum computing are in the US or in China, not one single company in Europe. And in artificial intelligence, American firms invest six times more than European firms. 
Europe, dear friends, let’s see: the reality is not competitive enough. And that’s why the EPP is happy that competitiveness is now top of the agenda in the European Union, thanks, first of all, to the Swedish Presidency, but also to the engagement from the European Commission this week with the proposals.
The EPP was always advocating for a jobs, jobs, jobs agenda in the European Union. And competitiveness is not an abstract word, it is about securing our European way of life, it’s about our welfare, about jobs. Europe will never be sovereign if it is not competitive. And no doubt our strength is the single market, the largest market in the world. That is what we should use.
And there we must still invest to enable more growth. We at the EPP, we don’t believe that spending money will solve our problems, first of all. For us a competitive Europe, what counts is trading with the world: best ideas, access to resources, efficient administration and a social approach.
Let me go to these concrete points. Speaking about trade, the whole problem with the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) started, let’s be honest, when parts of this House rejected the TTIP negotiations. If we had TTIP, we wouldn’t have to deal with IRA now because our Canadian and Mexican friends have full access to America.
A competitive Europe needs trade, and in this legislature, Europe is lacking fresh, ambitious approach when it comes to new free-trade agreements. We see no progress, for example, on Mercosur: 800 million consumers, or if I may say friends because they are closely linked to Europe. The friends from Mercosur area are waiting for us. We need new free trade agreement with the United States and we need a free trade union with the democracies in the world.
A second point: the competitive Europe should also not limit innovation and forbid technologies. In our last session here in February in the in the European Parliament, a majority decided to ban the combustion engine. I ask myself, who is now producing cars for areas, for regions like South America? I don’t think that they will have in 2035 enough electric charging infrastructure in South America that they can buy all-electric cars. The combustion engine is still necessary.
We hear some different voices, Stéphane from the Liberals and others are telling us that combustion engine is necessary and Bruno Le Maire is telling us that it is not any more the case. So we need a clear idea. We think that innovation and allowing technologies is the right answer, and not forbidding them.
I want to underline that a third point for us is the strategy to raw materials. China is more and more dominating global resources, and that’s why we welcome very much the Commission proposal for raw material strategy for Europe.
The fourth point is that we need competitiveness also with tackling cutting red tape, and I think with more ambition. In the short term, we should stop additional burdens for our economy in war times – they are struggling, they are having enough problems – they don’t need additional burdens. And in the mid and long run, I agree with Ursula von der Leyen that we set limits to bureaucracy by the European Commission and put all vice-presidents in charge to realise it.
I welcome the Commission proposals now for a competitiveness check on all new EU regulation and to reduce the reporting obligations for our economies and make our single market more competitive with less bureaucracy. So a competitive Europe, European regulation and cutting red tape have to go hand-in-hand. And, above all, we need a competitive Europe that must guarantee a social Europe. Being social means providing people with a job and with a decent income, especially our young generation. Our youth needs quality jobs.
We need jobs, jobs, jobs. Dear friends, Europe invented the cars because it was competitive. Let us invent now the next step of a digital age, like, for example, a digital Airbus project. Let’s make Europe the competitive powerhouse of this world. "};"The text does not provide any specific information or details about electric vehicles. However, it mentions ""all-electric cars"" in the context of discussing the ban on combustion engines. The speaker argues that banning combustion engines without providing sufficient electric charging infrastructure may be problematic for regions like South America.

In summary, the text only mentions electric vehicles in passing, as part of a broader discussion about the competitiveness and innovation of the European economy. It does not provide any specific information or details about electric vehicles themselves."};0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2023-03-15_3-7";"Philippe Lamberts";"Greens/EFA";"
    In the name of the Greens/EFA group. - Madam President, I may perhaps discuss a subject that will surprise you from a Green, but it is the subject that Manfred Weber talked to us about and which Stéphane Séjourné has just talked to us about. Competitiveness. A Green talking about competitiveness. What's going on? Is it because he is 60 years old that he starts talking about such a topic? Absolutely not.
    But I would like us to go back to basics. What is competitiveness? It is the ability to offer high-value goods or services at the lowest possible price. So it is a ratio between a numerator and a denominator. You will say that I am teaching, but we must remember the fundamentals. The cost is the denominator. Do you seriously think that Europe can or wants to be the champion of low cost? No. We have a social structure that we are proud of. Yes, we want to pay workers fairly. We want goods and services to be produced in respect for the environment. And all this involves additional costs. So, we will never be the champion of low cost.
    So, the only possibility for the European Union to be competitive is to be the champion of high value. And here, the question that we must ask ourselves is what are high-value goods and services in the 21st century? We can say, in a certain sense, that the European Union has so far missed the digital revolution. But what is the big game of the 21st century? It is to make our societies and economies compatible with the biophysical limits of the planet. This is where competitiveness will play out in the 21st century. And therefore, for the European Union, this is not just one issue among others. It is the issue that will determine whether our economies will be world champions or not in the 21st century.
    And here, I must say that I am worried. And I am particularly worried when listening to Manfred Weber. Not you, Madam President, nor you, Mr. President Michel, but rather when listening, feeling an increasingly strong resistance within this chamber, but also in the Council, regarding the ambition of the European Green Pact. Because the European Green Pact, we can say that it is a climate project, yes, of course, because the climate issue is a matter of survival. But it is in fact a strategy of competitiveness. It is exactly what it is.
    So, to relax now, as it seems to be the case for cars or the energy performance of buildings, abandoning effort is in fact to sink our economy. You know, today, the European automotive industry says that we will not play the game of the American or Chinese champions of electric cars. But this situation is not the result of over-regulation in Europe. It is the result of a deliberate choice by our automobile industries in Europe to choose the past rather than the future.
    And this, Madam President, is the reason for the lack of investment in Europe, that we have in Europe a rentier capitalism. This is no longer a capitalism of investors or entrepreneurs. We prefer - and especially in the case of the automobile, it shows - short-term profits rather than investing to ensure long-term profits.
    We must regain the ambition to innovate and undertake. And this implies getting out of the short-term comfort of rentier capitalism. This is what the Greens call for. And therefore, contrary to what one might think, the Greens are not lagging behind in economic terms. I think that better than others, we understand the stakes of this century."};"According to the speech, the European automotive industry has stated that they will not compete with American or Chinese companies in the production of electric cars. This is presented as a deliberate choice by the European automobile industries to choose the past rather than the future. There is no criticism or praise for electric vehicles themselves, only a mention of their role in the competition between European and other countries' automotive industries.

In summary, the text mentions that the European automotive industry has chosen not to invest in electric cars, preferring short-term profits over long-term investments, which is seen as a missed opportunity."};0;1;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2023-03-15_3-16";"Beata Szydło";"ECR";"
    Madam President! Dear Mr. President! Dear Members of Parliament! The question is simple: will accelerating the green transformation, the European Green Deal improve the situation and the fate of Europeans? Because all of us here are discussing this and pondering over it.
    I dare to doubt, because at this moment the crisis caused by the war in Ukraine should primarily make us think about starting to wonder what we can do on one hand to secure aid for Ukraine, but on the other hand not to allow Europe to cease being competitive and for Europeans to have something to live for - speaking colloquially, which is becoming an increasingly big problem with galloping inflation.
    And here very often questions arise: well, how come we won't be allowed to drive petrol cars? Who will afford electric cars? At the same time, modern solar panels and wind turbines producing energy will be produced. People ask if they will be produced without emissions. No, they won't.
    In connection with this, why should the cost of our budgets take place at this moment this accelerated transformation? This is one issue. The second issue, dear Members of Parliament - more importantly, it seems to me at this moment - we must first and foremost once again clearly emphasize that Ukraine needs our support and this support must primarily be military - they need military equipment.
    And if so, individual countries must also arm themselves, produce and buy military equipment. The Polish government has proposed to exclude these defense expenses outside the deficit so that they do not enter the rules of the European Union budget. Because for many countries it will be an extraordinary help to on one hand support Ukraine, but on the other hand to help citizens, residents who are struggling at this moment with galloping inflation."};"According to the speech, it is mentioned that:

* ""Who will afford electric cars?"" - This question is raised as a concern.
* It is stated that people ask if modern solar panels and wind turbines producing energy will be produced without emissions, but the answer is no, they won't.

That's all the information about electric vehicles mentioned in the speech."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;
"2023-03-15_3-39";"Valérie Hayer";"Renew";"
    Madam President, Mr. President, Mr. Commissioner, the United States, at a time when we are talking to each other, continue to aspire to our great European industries, Northvolt, Volkswagen, BASF, Solvay. It is deindustrialization that awaits us.
    And if we want to respond to this challenge, it will take more than just a diplomatic visit to ensure the sole sale of our electric vehicles across the Atlantic. We need general exemptions and above all, tangible investments in Europe. And everyone here has understood this, except perhaps the EPP, the very own political group of President von der Leyen, which does everything to block the European Parliament on its response to the IRA.
    But the real issue, fundamentally, is the place of Europe in the world, in this world so upheaved. It's how Europe gets out of all these strategic dependencies that make us weaker, energy, medicines, fertilizers or even photovoltaic panels. That's why, Mr. President, Mr. Commissioner, the European Union, if it wants to become a real power, must stop suffering the decisions of others. It must become prospective and for that, heads of state and the Commission must stop procrastinating. Today is when we decide our future."};"According to the speech, it is mentioned that:

* The speaker wants to ensure the ""sole sale"" of European electric vehicles across the Atlantic.
* This requires more than just diplomatic visits, but rather general exemptions and tangible investments in Europe.

That's all the information about electric vehicles mentioned in the text."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;
"2023-03-15_11-11";"Paolo Borchia";"ID";"
    In the name of the ID group. - Mr. President, honorable colleagues, I asked to intervene on this point because I am very curious about the title: ""More Europe, more jobs: let's build the competitive economy of tomorrow."" An appealing title, then one goes back to committee, begins to work on the dossiers and problems related to competitiveness arise.
    Since the beginning of the legislature, we have been told that the Green Deal would leave no one behind. However, the numbers tell a different story: just a few weeks ago, Ford announced the elimination of 3,800 jobs in the name of transitioning to electric vehicles. This is not going well. The insistence on militant ecology continues to put human beings in second place and does not take into account that Europe is heading in one direction while the rest of the planet is heading in another.
    It is difficult, colleagues, to be competitive when Union policies are so zealous, for example, think about climate or energy. Let's make a reflection on the topic of packaging regulations, which always follows the same method: proposals made without impact assessment, without listening to businesses - businesses that define these proposals as wrong and dangerous. Therefore, colleagues, the concept of competitiveness is appealing to everyone but our entrepreneurs ask us to make it concrete and not just talk about it."};"According to the speech, Ford announced the elimination of 3,800 jobs due to transitioning to electric vehicles. This is mentioned as an example of how the Green Deal's emphasis on militant ecology can have negative consequences for human beings, putting them ""in second place"". The speaker suggests that this decision was made without considering the impact it would have on people's lives and livelihoods."};0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2023-03-15_11-18";"Alexandr Vondra";"ECR";" – Mr President, yes, we terribly need a more competitive economy and to generate more jobs in Europe now. But we are taking the wrong way. A typical example is the monopoly in electromobility production, which this Commission is trying to promote. We are just shooting into our leg and we are inviting China to overcome us, instead of keeping our competitive advantage in combustion engines alive. We need to change course. We need less green ideology and more capitalist pragmatism. For innovation, we need fewer bureaucrats and more venture funds. We need less regulation and more liberty. We do not need bans, command economies or long—term planning. We need the freedom of choice and for competition inside Europe to succeed globally."};"According to the speech, the European Commission is trying to promote a monopoly in electromobility production (electric vehicles). The speaker argues that this approach is misguided and will ultimately lead to Europe being overtaken by China. They suggest that instead of promoting electric vehicles, Europe should focus on maintaining its competitive advantage in combustion engines."};0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2023-03-15_11-38";"Nicolas Schmit";"NA";" Member of the Commission. - Mr. President, firstly, I believe that this was a very useful debate on a major issue, since what is at stake is ultimately the future of Europe, the future of our countries and the prosperity of our countries.
    As it is now fashionable to look a lot at the United States, which have caused a kind of shock, I would just like to quote an American president, who seems to inspire much of the current American president, namely Roosevelt. He said, at the time of the 1929 crisis: 'The only limit to our realization of tomorrow will be our doubts of today'. So I believe that this is a good lesson, because it is not enough to doubt, to sow fear - another theme, by the way, of Roosevelt. I believe that what we need today is strong political will. And this must be achieved at the European level. And I fully understand the very clear lesson, extremely dangerous to ignore, to neglect the new geopolitical and geo-economic realities to which we must face.
    I think Europe has reacted. We have been the first to react and act, especially in the face of climate change. However, it is still strange that suddenly, this is being questioned. When others, whether they are the Chinese, the Americans, the Canadians, what do they do? Well, they implement climate change policies, they implement strong industrial policies, those we recommended from the outset. So, let us not be destabilized. I think the greatest danger now is to add uncertainty to the existing instability in today's world.
    What businesses need, it is true, is an acceptable regulatory framework. And there I agree that perhaps it would be necessary to review this, but this is not only a question for Europe. We always have the impression that Europe regulates everything. Perhaps we should also look a little at the side of the Member States. And above all, how the Member States implement regulations. Deadlines, it is not Europe, it is the Member States. And therefore, that is absolutely a point that must be addressed.
    But the other point is also now to continue on our path. Questioning decisions that have been made, does this help businesses? Is it adding uncertainty to their plans? I notice in the United States, they are betting on electricity too at the level of the automobile. Because the whole plan is precisely to encourage the manufacture of electric cars in the United States.
    And what do the Chinese do? The Chinese are either, or at least they are considering flooding the markets with electric cars. And therefore, it must be prepared in relation to this. It must be faced in terms of these challenges, and indeed invest in technology more quickly, invest in human capital, as has been said.
    I believe that we have good cards, we must play them. We must play them collectively. This means more Europe. But a better Europe, so that effectively, within this new international game, Europe is not the big loser."};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned related to electric vehicles:

1. The United States is betting on electricity at the level of the automobile, with the goal of encouraging the manufacture of electric cars in the country.
2. China is either considering or already planning to flood the markets with electric cars.

These two points are mentioned as examples of how other countries are addressing the issue of electric vehicles, and the speaker suggests that Europe should also be prepared for these challenges and invest in technology and human capital more quickly."};0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;
"2023-03-29_11-3";"Ursula von der Leyen";"NA";" President of the Commission. – President Metsola, President Michel, honourable Members. Indeed, we had a lot of topics on the agenda in the last European Council. I want to focus on three of them, and the centrepiece was certainly competitiveness with the view of our response to the Inflation Reduction Act.
You are very familiar with the backdrop, so we discussed how to answer to the Inflation Reduction Act. You know what's on the table. The first part is the negotiated part. You know that we confirmed with our American friends our understanding that European carmakers get access to the US market and to US tax breaks with leased electric vehicles.
The second part is that we negotiate an agreement that will ensure that critical raw minerals for batteries that are extracted and processed here in the European Union are treated equally to those from Canada and Mexico, for example, as if we had a free trade agreement.
Third, President Biden and I established a transparency dialogue on the clean tech subsidies. This is one part, this is the negotiated part. But the bigger and more important part is that we have to do our homework here in the European Union. We know that, today, European companies are leaders in net—zero research and innovation. We have set ourselves very ambitious targets for the deployment of renewables. However, our policies have a gap, and that is the support for the manufacturing of clean technologies.
You all know this situation where, the moment a new technology moves to commercial deployment at scale, and so is really scaling up, that is just the moment where manufacturing often moves outside the European Union. We know that China is the largest producer of all mass—manufactured clean tech, from batteries to solar panels, from certain types of electrolysers to heat pumps.
This is especially concerning because, according to the International Energy Agency, renewables will account for over 90% of global electricity expansion in the next five years. In other words, China will be the biggest winner of this expansion, and if we do not act right now, this Chinese dominance over the clean tech value chain will become even more – not less – pronounced.
This is why the Commission has put forward two acts. The first is the Net—Zero Industry Act and the second is the Critical Raw Materials Act. We discussed the Net—Zero Industry Act. It will create a regulatory environment that is conducive to scaling up the clean tech industry in Europe, so precisely the gap that we have right now, in order to fill this gap and to really encourage scaling—up.
This is combined with European funding or state aid – both possibilities are possible – and with a matching clause, so that we have transparency on what happens on the American market. In other words, the Net—Zero Industry Act aims at keeping European companies in Europe, and not seeing them emigrate across the Atlantic or to China.
The second element we discussed is the proposal of the Critical Raw Materials Act on the table. Now, we all know that the critical raw materials are vital for our twin transition, namely decarbonisation and digitalisation. While the demand for these raw materials is projected to increase drastically, we know that Europe heavily depends on imports. Of course, this dependency that we have on imports threatens not only our climate and digital objectives, but also weakens our industrial base. Therefore, the Critical Raw Materials Act aims at significantly improving the conditions for extracting, processing and – very importantly – recycling these critical raw materials here in the European Union. At the same time, we are strengthening our cooperation with reliable partners around the world, whether it be zinc or nickel from Canada, or lithium from Chile.
Mesdames et Messieurs les députés, mon deuxième thème: l’Ukraine. L’Ukraine a été un autre sujet important de nos discussions la semaine dernière. Depuis le tout premier jour de la guerre, nous avons travaillé ensemble dans un seul but: faire échouer le plan de Poutine visant à effacer l’Ukraine de la carte. Pour atteindre ce but, nous avons intensifié notre aide financière. Nous avons mis sur pied une plateforme de reconstruction pour rebâtir ce beau et héroïque pays. Enfin, et c’est une vraie première pour notre Union, nous avons acheté en commun des armes dont l’Ukraine a besoin pour se défendre.
Notre prochaine étape sera de doter l’Ukraine des munitions dont elle a grandement besoin. Nous allons donc investir 2 milliards d’euros venant de la Facilité européenne pour la paix, pour assurer la livraison continue de munitions. Elles viendront de stocks existants ou feront l’objet d’une acquisition conjointe. Nous devons aussi aider notre industrie de la défense à augmenter sa capacité de production de munitions, y compris avec l’appui budgétaire de l’Union européenne. C’est-à-dire qu’il faut agrandir les installations de production, renforcer les chaînes d’approvisionnement et soutenir la réaffectation de sites de fabrication existants.
Nous avons dit que nous soutiendrons l’Ukraine quoi qu’il en coûte, et l’Europe tiendra sa promesse.
Und das dritte Thema, über das ich aus dem Europäischen Rat berichten möchte, ist ein anderer Aspekt des russischen Kriegs in der Ukraine. Jeder Krieg ist grausam. Aber dieser Krieg zeigt eine Grausamkeit und Brutalität des Kremls, was eine ganz neue Dimension entwickelt.
Ich spreche zum Beispiel von der Verschleppung ukrainischer Kinder. Putins Schergen sollen rund 16 200 Kinder nach Russland entführt haben. Sie wurden aus ihren Familien und aus ihrer Kindheit gerissen. Sie wurden ihrer Heimat und ihrer gewohnten Umgebung beraubt und, wenn wir nicht aktiv werden, auch ihrer Zukunft.
Das zynische Adoptionsgesetz, das Russland im vergangenen Mai erlassen hat, erleichtert die Adoption dieser Kinder aus der Ukraine. Das Risiko ist also groß, dass sie für immer im Nirgendwo verschwinden. Das sind Kriegsverbrechen! Die, die daran beteiligt sind, müssen zur Verantwortung gezogen werden!
Genau aus diesem Grund hat der Internationale Strafgerichtshof einen Haftbefehl gegen den russischen Präsidenten erlassen. Das ist ein Schritt, der seinesgleichen sucht. Mit dieser Entscheidung ist die Welt für Putin ein ganzes Stück kleiner geworden. Wenn er in eines der 123 Länder reist, die mit dem Internationalen Strafgerichtshof zusammenarbeiten, riskiert er seine Verhaftung. Jeder Besuch in einem dieser Länder, sei es in Afrika oder Asien, sei es in Europa oder Südamerika, wird so für ihn zu einem unkalkulierbaren Risiko.
Wir unterstützen den Gerichtshof, bis der Gerechtigkeit Genüge getan ist. Wir haben bereits Sanktionen gegen 16 Personen verhängt, die für die Verschleppungen verantwortlich sind, darunter die sogenannte Russische Beauftragte für Kinderrechte. Aber wir müssen mehr tun. Wir müssen versuchen, herauszufinden, wo sich die entführten Kinder aufhalten. Und wir müssen alles daransetzen, sie nach Hause zu bringen.
Ich bin den Mitgliedstaaten, die uns unterstützen, sehr dankbar. Ebenso möchte ich dem UN-Generalsekretär António Guterres dafür danken, dass die Vereinten Nationen und ihre Agenturen mit Rat und Expertise, die sie leider in diesem Thema haben, an unserer Seite stehen.
Meine Damen und Herren Abgeordneten, Kinder sind die schwächsten und verletzlichsten Opfer eines jeden Krieges. Es ist gerade in Zeiten des Krieges, dass wir sie und ihre Rechte besonders schützen müssen: ihr Recht, frei zu sein, ihr Recht, sicher zu sein, ihr Recht, geborgen zu sein. Lassen Sie uns gemeinsam mit unseren ukrainischen Freunden die Rechte der Kinder verteidigen.
Slawa Ukrajini! Long live Europe!"};"The text mentions electric vehicles in the following context:

""...European carmakers get access to the US market and to US tax breaks with leased electric vehicles.""

This refers to an agreement between the European Union and the United States, where European car manufacturers will have access to the US market and can benefit from US tax breaks for leasing electric vehicles. This is part of a broader discussion about competitiveness and the response to the Inflation Reduction Act.

There is no further mention of electric vehicles in the text beyond this single sentence."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;
"2023-03-29_11-17";"Jordan Bardella";"ID";" – Madam President, Mr. President Charles Michel, for General MacArthur, lost battles can be summed up in two words: too late. For the past two decades, our dependence on China has continued to grow. At first limited to the role of a low-cost economy and cheap goods manufacturer, the Chinese empire is now an unavoidable global player. It is, since we were talking about energy, a must-pass for the production of wind turbines and photovoltaic panels, which the European Union has almost made the cornerstones of its energy transition.
    China has become a major predator for Europe's most strategic companies. The spectacular takeover in 2016 of the German Kuka, leader in industrial robotics, and the same port of Piraeus in Greece that year are just emblematic symbols and perhaps the tree hiding the forest. It is a fierce competitor in the knowledge economy and tomorrow's technologies, from artificial intelligence to electric cars. Carlos Tavares, the highly respected CEO of Stellantis, recently lamented that carpets had been rolled out for Chinese builders.
    Faced with this reality, the time has come for action rather than mere observation. We must protect our public markets today more open than those of China, prioritize European companies in public procurement, protect our strategic assets, invest both in innovation and education. The protection of our sovereignty also involves a thorough investigation into suspicions of espionage weighing on TikTok, its links with Chinese power, and the manipulation of precious user data from European hands that are not ours.
    Europe is not doomed to remain prey to Beijing. It's about our future, our freedom, our sovereignty, our independence, and our power."};"According to the speech, China has become a major player in the production of wind turbines and photovoltaic panels, which are cornerstones of the European Union's energy transition. Additionally, it is mentioned that China is also a fierce competitor in ""tomorrow's technologies, from artificial intelligence to electric cars"". This implies that China is investing in and developing electric vehicles as part of its technological advancements.

No further information about electric vehicles is provided in the text beyond this mention."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;
"2023-03-29_11-26";"Gunnar Beck";"ID";"
    Madam President! Chancellor Scholz has managed to strike a bad compromise on E-fuels in Brussels, amidst the EU ban for combustion engines. This no longer helps the German automotive industry. They are losing their stronghold of exporting combustion engines and now compete with electric cars from China and the USA. Both are heavily subsidized, while the Commission is blocking EU subsidies. Likewise, it does not help most drivers who cannot afford an E-fuels car.
    
    The German and European economy have so far benefited firstly from cheap Russian energy and secondly from export successes, especially overseas. The EU under German-green misguidance is making energy unaffordable and endangering our export industry and thus our livelihood. Finally put an end to your green nonsense and your stagflation policy for our economy and give free rein to free citizens."};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned related to electric vehicles:

1. The German automotive industry is now competing with electric cars from China and the USA.
2. Electric cars from these countries (China and the USA) are heavily subsidized.
3. The Commission is blocking EU subsidies for electric cars.

In summary, the speaker is highlighting that Germany's traditional stronghold in exporting combustion engines is being threatened by the rise of electric vehicles from other countries, which receive heavy government support."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;1;0;
"2023-03-29_11-35";"Claudia Gamon";"Renew";"
    - Madam President! The topic of cars moves many young people, especially those who are climate aware. A well-informed student asked me here in the house yesterday: What about these E-fuels - is that just lobbying from the car industry? Many are surprised to hear that the industry is actually much further along than many in politics realize.
    The European automotive industry wanted clarity. They already have deadlines for their last combustion models, which are far beyond 2035. What we still have instead, however - thanks to the Council - is uncertainty, ongoing uncertainty also for the European automotive industry. And they are in a tough global competition for electric mobility, which we now risk losing due to felt truths, anecdotal knowledge, misinformation, and completely misguided nostalgia for yesterday's way of life.
    On the way to this disastrous solution, European democracy has also been seriously damaged. One can only thank the German government and the Austrian government - for absolutely nothing."};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned related to electric vehicles:

1. The European automotive industry has deadlines for their last combustion models, which are far beyond 2035.
2. The industry is already working on electric mobility and is in a tough global competition for it.
3. The speaker suggests that Europe risks losing this competition due to ""felt truths, anecdotal knowledge, misinformation, and completely misguided nostalgia for yesterday's way of life"".

In summary, the speech mentions that the European automotive industry is moving towards electric vehicles, with deadlines for their last combustion models beyond 2035, but is at risk of falling behind in the global competition due to various factors."};0;1;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2023-04-17_15-4";"David Casa";"NA";"
    Rapporteur. - On President, during the debate, it was mentioned that climate change is the biggest challenge facing humanity and that the European Parliament is obliged to act urgently and take strong positions with concrete and effective solutions for citizens, governments, and international communities. During this debate, the Parliament will initiate a process that has been going on for several years and months.
    In addressing these challenges, the industry must also be directed towards important aspects of European industry, which in turn directs important social aspects and contributes to mitigating the impact of climate change. And, as we have seen, environmental impacts are also affected. Despite the pandemic, there is no reason for us to be more concerned about the social aspect than the health aspect or the climate impact on our families, our children, our future generations - those who we owe a debt for the well-being of our society's economy.
    It is important that during this debate, the Parliament prioritizes addressing the real and urgent issues that affect us all. The European Climate Social Fund has been produced over several years of negotiations and consultations. It represents an investment of EUR 86.7 billion to invest in jobs and businesses across Europe. This includes investments such as solar panels, insulation, and more efficient energy. This also includes more sustainable transport - investments that will benefit our citizens, who will reduce energy consumption, emissions, and costs, and will also contribute to the overall well-being of our countries. And we must not forget that there are many families and businesses with limited resources that can only afford investments in solar panels, insulation, and more efficient energy.
    The content also states that the social involvement should be increased. The content also states that funds should be allocated to support families and small businesses with limited resources so that they can benefit from these investments. This will help create jobs and contribute to a better future for our children and future generations.
    I believe that the negotiations will be complex, as there are many challenges in the process, but extraordinary times require extraordinary measures. I would like to thank the first president of the cooperation committee, the first president of the assembly, the European Commission for their assistance, and all the parliamentarians, rapporteurs, shadow rapporteurs, advisors, and secretariat and members who will be involved in this final report, especially Esther de Lange, who has worked tirelessly to ensure that the arrangements are in place.
    In conclusion, we have a significant social challenge, a fund of billions for investments that will help mitigate climate change, which is a global challenge for our citizens, governments, and international communities."};"The text does not mention electric vehicles specifically. However, it does mention ""more sustainable transport"" as one of the investments included in the European Climate Social Fund, which has an investment of EUR 86.7 billion. This fund aims to invest in jobs and businesses across Europe, including investments such as solar panels, insulation, and more efficient energy.

The text does not provide further details about what constitutes ""more sustainable transport"" or whether electric vehicles are included in this category. It only mentions that these investments will benefit citizens by reducing energy consumption, emissions, and costs, and contribute to the overall well-being of countries."};0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2023-04-17_15-19";"Leila Chaibi";"NA";"
    Reporting for the opinion of the Transport and Tourism Committee. - Mr. President, dear colleagues, allow me to warn you. Europeans are being strangled by inflation, and you are about to tighten the noose.
    By approving the extension of the carbon market to buildings and transport, you will make the ecological transition pay for households. To those who have no other choice but to put petrol in their car to go to work, you say: ""Climate warming is your fault. You will pay more, but it's for a good cause and don't complain.""
    It's not because you make gasoline more expensive that Europeans will consume less or find thousands of euros to buy an electric car. It's not because you make heating more expensive that Europeans will suddenly find thousands of euros to invest in the thermal insulation of their housing. In this context, the Social Climate Fund is just a band-aid on a broken leg.
    Fight against climate warming, yes, but do not make the ecological transition pay for the most precarious workers and households. The European Commission itself recognizes that all this will affect household budgets. Experts talk about a 50 cent increase per liter of gasoline - and that's not the worst scenario.
    Some here have short memories. I mainly think of my French colleagues and those from Renaissance in particular. We are well placed, in France, to know that hitting workers in the wallet under the pretext of fighting climate change is counterproductive and creates social anger.
    Be careful, dear colleagues, not to add social injustice to climatic irresponsibility. Be careful, dear colleagues, because if you decide that it is for European workers to pay the bill for the ecological transition, you risk finding on all roundabouts in Europe this yellow vest that I show you as a warning."};"According to the speech, it is mentioned that:

* The speaker claims that making gasoline more expensive will not lead Europeans to consume less or buy an electric car, as they do not have thousands of euros to invest in such alternatives.
* This implies that the speaker believes that electric vehicles are a luxury item that only certain individuals can afford.

That's the extent of the information about electric vehicles mentioned in the speech."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;
"2023-04-17_15-43";"Marie-Pierre Vedrenne";"Renew";"
    Mr. President, in our battle to achieve carbon neutrality, no one will be left behind. In our battle for carbon neutrality, no territory and no ultra-peripheral region will be forgotten. In our battle, it is the ecological transition and social justice. The creation of the Social Climate Fund is proof of this.
    
    Today, our message to Europeans is clear: we will support the modest, our craftsmen, our very small businesses. Europe will be present. Check energy, electric vehicle purchase aid, financial support for sustainable public transport, are some examples of what the Social Climate Fund will finance.
    
    Some here claim to be defenders of national purchasing power, but they will not hesitate to vote against this European fund. We will not forget that they are the undertakers of budgets and that they are the undertakers of the climate. We will continue our battle, that of the ecological transition and social justice."};"According to the speech, the Social Climate Fund will finance ""electric vehicle purchase aid"" as one of its examples of supported initiatives. This means that the fund will provide financial assistance to individuals or organizations for the purchase of electric vehicles."};0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;
"2023-04-17_15-61";"Zdzisław Krasnodębski";"ECR";"
    Dear Madam President! Madam Commissioner! With the adoption of this legislative package, we enter a new phase of our intensified climate policy, and in a very difficult situation: after the pandemic, during an ongoing war, and increasing migration pressure. This is a phase in which the high costs of this transformation are becoming increasingly visible, as well as the rising costs for citizens. Citizens have already noticed this: not only in Poland, but also in Germany, in the Netherlands, everywhere. The costs of this transformation will be even higher.
    
    This primarily concerns ETS 2, which will cover private road transport and buildings from 2027. Experts remain very skeptical about whether it will actually be possible to control prices in ETS 2. And the ETS 2 system will hit Union countries with the lowest GDP hardest, where most consumers heat their homes with fossil fuels, coal or gas, and where electromobility is less developed.
    
    EU funds will not be enough to compensate for the costs of transformation. Rich countries will be able to provide additional support for their citizens. They are already doing so. As a result of this rushed policy, there will therefore be dangerous economic differentiation between countries and growing social dissatisfaction."};"According to the speech, electromobility (electric vehicles) is mentioned as being less developed in certain Union countries with lower GDP, where most consumers heat their homes with fossil fuels, coal or gas. This implies that these countries may not have a well-established infrastructure for electric vehicles or may not have adopted them widely yet."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;
"2023-04-17_15-87";"Beata Mazurek";"ECR";" - Madam President! The expansion of the European Emissions Trading System to new sectors planned for 2027 will bring negative social consequences due to the increase in fuel prices and payments related to heating homes with fossil fuels. It is obvious that such provisions will affect countries like mine, Poland, where a large part of society still heats their homes with coal or gas, and where the number of electric cars in use remains low. By 2027, not everyone will be able to replace their heating systems with a heat pump or solar panels, as not everyone will be able to afford it. This will result in further costs for our citizens who are already struggling with an energy crisis, high raw material prices and inflation. Listening to this debate, I have the impression that not everyone is aware of this, which concerns me, unfortunately, both myself and my fellow citizens."};"According to the speech, it is mentioned that:

* The number of electric cars in use remains low in Poland.
* Not everyone will be able to replace their heating systems with a heat pump or solar panels by 2027, implying that electric vehicles are not an immediate solution for all citizens.

That's the only information related to electric vehicles mentioned in the text."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;
"2023-04-18_2-28";"Jaak Madison";"ID";" – Mr President, first of all, we have to understand what it means to have a common foreign policy towards China? In China there is one capital, in the US there is one capital, and we have 27 capitals. So when we have some kind of common line, who is setting up the common line and common policy when we are talking about climate policy, when we’re talking about trade policy, about defence, about the military? And we can see very different opinions from Paris to Berlin and towards the north and eastern countries.
So that’s why it’s a bit confusing to hear about the messages from Paris, from Mr Macron, that we need strategic autonomy. It could be a very nice idea, of course. But what will the EU, the European countries, do and what will France do when China attacks Taiwan? There is some kind of tensions in France that we shouldn’t rely too much on the US. Okay, fine. What is the alternative? Have we invested enough in defence? No. Just now, I checked the facts. France has given to Ukraine military aid twice less than Germany, on the same level with Greece. And we are still waiting for the end of the war and we are not capable to win the war as soon as possible.
And when there is a new war in Taiwan, yes, we can make some very nice resolutions and make some statements. Yes, we support democracy and human rights and values. Yeah, they really care about that in China. But other than the fact about democracy and human rights – yes, I know that the European Parliament would like to export all the same values in every corner of the whole world, and I’m not really a fan of that – we should also take care of the economic fact when we are dreaming about the Green Deal and electric cars. In Taiwan they are producing over 60% of the world’s semiconductors. And when Taiwan is gone, then good luck with your Green Deal and electric cars.
So now it’s the crucial question: are we choosing the Chinese side, talking just a very nice word: ‘yeah, let’s be partners, let’s be friends’? Or are we understanding the realistic world – that we have a rival on the Chinese and Russian side and we have a partner on the American side? Because we are not capable here to invest enough in our defence and in our economy."};"According to the speech, the speaker mentions electric cars as part of the European Union's ""Green Deal"". The speaker suggests that Taiwan, which produces over 60% of the world's semiconductors, is crucial for the production of electric vehicles. The implication is that if Taiwan were to be lost (i.e., taken over by China), it would be difficult for Europe to achieve its goals related to electric cars and the Green Deal.

In summary, the speaker mentions electric vehicles as a key component of the European Union's environmental policy (Green Deal) and highlights the importance of Taiwan in producing semiconductors necessary for their production."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;
"2023-04-18_2-44";"Jean-Lin Lacapelle";"ID";"
    Mr. President, ""When China awakens, the whole world will tremble,"" Napoleon could have said. China has awoken. The world trembles. Emmanuel Macron and Ursula von der Leyen both went to try to appease the Chinese president and only received humiliations. There is no need to dwell on Macron, whose speech has no value and only says what his audience of the day wants to hear. But the European Union as a whole has no coherence towards China.
    I will only take one example, but a very symbolic one, that of electric cars. The end of the sale of thermal vehicles in 2035 gives in practice the keys to our energy and industrial destiny to China, since it has a quasi-monopoly on the extraction of metals necessary for electric batteries and also has a significant advantage in competitive electric cars. This is what the European strategy is: to commit suicide for our automotive industry in favor of China. And this is just one example among thousands.
    The globalist policy of delocalization that you have followed for fifty years has led you to entrust our destiny to China. Without breaking with this policy, you will remain prisoners of it."};"According to the speech, the end of the sale of thermal vehicles in 2035 (presumably in Europe) would give China control over Europe's energy and industrial destiny. This is because:

1. China has a ""quasi-monopoly"" on the extraction of metals necessary for electric batteries.
2. China has a significant advantage in competitive electric cars.

The speaker argues that this would be a result of European Union's lack of coherence towards China, and that it would effectively commit suicide for Europe's automotive industry by favoring China."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;
"2023-04-18_2-61";"Mislav Kolakušić";"NI";"
    – Dear Mr. Chairman, dear colleagues, dear citizens, three decades ago Europe was a world power and China was a relatively poor developing country. Back then, Europe was led by strong national politicians, and today it is led by men in gowns. Today, China is a global economic and military superpower, while the EU is completely irrelevant on the world stage, except as a tourist destination.
    
    – Today, the European Union is promoting the production of electric cars. 95% of lithium, without which electric cars cannot be produced, is produced today in China. When, after Russia, we now impose sanctions on China, that is, we will completely stop car production in the European Union. Is this where we are going? To complete collapse? No, thank you!"};"According to the speech, the European Union is promoting the production of electric cars. Additionally, it is mentioned that 95% of lithium, which is necessary for producing electric cars, is currently produced in China. This implies that if sanctions are imposed on China, the production of electric cars in the European Union would likely come to a halt."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;
"2023-04-18_6-6";"Ville Niinistö";"Greens/EFA";"on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group. – Mr President, dear Commissioner, with the Fit for 55 package, energy and climate files are mainly agreed. We are now moving very fast into a renewables-based energy system, and renewables are the main tool to achieve the climate ambition. 
Currently, energy use accounts for 75% of our greenhouse gas emissions and for these emissions to be reduced in a cost efficient way, we also need different flexibility tools, such as demand-side response, supply-side flexibility, interconnections and obviously, as a key component, storage. Therefore, the communication is very important in this regard. We will need more storage to have a cost-efficient, climate-smart and integrated energy system that helps Europe to move into a sustainable energy system.
I am happy to see that many elements from our own initiative report, led by Renew’s Claudia Gamon, that the Parliament voted on in July 2020, are included in the communication, namely the need for different types of storage with different time frames. One evolving example is the storage within district heating, which makes it possible also for district heating to be a part of an integrated, effective flexibility mechanism, the important role of individuals and collectives, including also the role of electric vehicles as potential decentralised storage assets, so we have more and more prosumers also within the context of storage, the requirement to consider storage when planning new grid infrastructures as new infrastructure might not be needed or to a different extent when adequate storage is available.
In general, the Greens support the Commission’s recommendation on energy storage. However, the main points of this text must be anchored in the market design legislation and they should not only be non-binding recommendations. In the Renewable Energy Directive, the permitting aspects related to storage assets were accelerated, so developing storage can be a lot faster than we have foreseen in so far. The Parliament wanted an obligation for Member States to set up demand-side response and storage targets. However, during the trilogue phase, the main argument to not include these targets was that the RED was not the right place to do this, while the market design reform would be. 
Therefore, now we urge to introduce binding targets to allow for a cost-efficient transition into the electricity market design negotiations. In the same vein, an obligation to consider the potential of storage and demand response in any capacity generation mechanism is key for cost-efficiency and climate-smart solutions.
To conclude, I hope to see many of the elements of the communication introduced into actual legislation."};"According to the speech, electric vehicles are mentioned as ""potential decentralised storage assets"". This means that they have the potential to be used as decentralized storage systems, which can help with energy flexibility and integration into an integrated energy system.

In other words, the speaker is highlighting the possibility of using electric vehicles as a form of energy storage, where they can store excess energy generated by renewable sources and release it when needed. This concept is referred to as ""prosumers"", meaning that individuals or collectives (in this case, electric vehicle owners) can both produce and consume energy.

The speaker does not provide further details on how this would work or what specific benefits it would bring, but rather mentions it as one of the evolving examples of storage within district heating."};0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2023-04-18_6-41";"Kadri Simson";"NA";" Member of the Commission. – Madam President, honourable Members, I’m delighted to see that there is an overall consensus on the important role of energy storage. We agree that we must double down on integrating new renewable generation into the grid, and for that we need flexibility and storage solutions to replace the role traditionally played by gas-fired installations.
Many of you stressed that there is significant potential to be unlocked in Europe. Some of you asked whether the Commission favours some form of storage solutions over others. Let me be clear: we promote a technology-neutral approach. Moving towards a decarbonised system require all forms of low-carbon storage to balance the variable supply with variable demand. We need batteries big and small, behind-the-meter storage solutions, thermal storage or decentralised storage, like electricity stored in electric vehicles.
The only option we do not cover in the Commission recommendation and the staff document are gas storage or oil storage stocks. Some of you mentioned the need for fast-tracking permitting also for storage installations, and this is a valid point. We try to address this through the REpowerEU emergency regulatory amendments, which cover permitting processes for energy storage combined with renewable energy projects through co-located projects and go-to areas.
Energy storage assets related to the deployment of renewable generation are presumed to be of overriding public interest. The recommendation on permitting procedures and power-purchase agreements also suggests useful acceleration measures. And cross-border energy storage projects identified under the trans-European network for energy within the EU-wide ten-year network development plan and selected as a project of common interest (PCI) in the Union list will benefit from fast-track procedures in addition to possible funding.
We are currently working on a cost-benefit analysis methodology for the selection of energy storage as projects of common interest, and this process will be finalised soon. All of this can be done without compromising on environmental protection.
On whether a European target for storage would be useful, let me say that with the electricity market design proposal, we get very close to that. We proposed that by 1 January 2025 and every two years thereafter, the regulatory authority of each Member State shall assess the need for flexibility in the electricity system for a period of at least five years. Based on this, each Member State is required to define an indicative national objective for demand-side response and storage. The combination of these national targets will help accelerate flexibility services, including energy-storage capacities.
Once again, I would like to thank you for the valuable discussion today and offer that we continue to work together on this very crucial issue."};"According to the speech, electric vehicles are mentioned as one form of decentralized storage solution for energy storage. The speaker states: ""We need batteries big and small, behind-the-meter storage solutions, thermal storage or decentralised storage, like electricity stored in electric vehicles.""

In this context, the mention of electric vehicles is related to their potential use as a means of storing electricity, which can help balance variable supply with variable demand in the energy system."};0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2023-04-19_17-3";"Nicolas Schmit";"NA";" Member of the Commission. – Madam President, dear Members of the Parliament, I am standing in for Commissioner Breton. We all became aware of the misuse of defeat devices in the automotive industry in the context of the 2015 Dieselgate scandal, when certain car manufacturers manipulated the emission control to pass the test foreseen by the legislation to prove compliance with their pollutant emission standards. Later on, various investigations by Member States have revealed the use of such devices by other manufacturers.
Since then, thanks also to the Parliament’s efforts, the Commission – within the limits of our enforcement powers at the time – and Member States have taken several measures to sanction these practices and to prevent such a scandal from happening again.
First, in 2016, the Commission launched six infringement procedures against Member States who initially failed to report the necessary legislation or to impose sanctions on manufacturers who had vehicle types approved that did not comply with the legal requirements foreseen. In the meantime, these procedures were closed as the relevant Member States changed their legislation or impose the required penalties on the manufacturers. As of today, one case launched in 2017 against Italy is not yet closed. The evaluation of the latest changes in the Italian law are ongoing.
Second, the Commission rapidly recognised the need to improve the market surveillance regulatory framework. As such, we complemented checks of vehicles on the market by national authorities with the European oversight of type—approval and market surveillance activities through checks to be carried out by the Commission.
Third, we also changed the way how we react if it turns out that rules have been broken. This includes the possibility for the Commission to initiate EU—wide recalls and impose fines of up to EUR 30 000 per non-compliant car. These rules, however, only apply to new cars put on the market since September 2020.
And fourth, we have fundamentally changed the way we handle vehicle—emission type—approval. That implies new and improved mandatory emission tests in the laboratory and in real driving situations. Since these changes, vehicles are significantly cleaner than their predecessors. Real driving emission testing has led to a considerable drop in the real amount of NOx emissions, well below the legal limit. This is good for air quality, notably in urban areas with heavy traffic and above all, consumers are better informed of the real environmental performance of the vehicles they purchase.
And finally, we also want to ensure that future generations of vehicles are developed according to the best environmental standards. This is why the Commission adopted in November 2022 a proposal for Euro 7, which sets new standards for air pollutant emissions from light and heavy duty vehicles, including from electric vehicles, which is currently under discussion by the European Parliament and the Council.
On 22 March, the NGO ICCT – the International Council on Clean Transportation – published a study on the emission behaviour of Euro 5 and Euro 6 vehicles. The study shows the results of emissions tests conducted by Member States covering the period from 2016 to 2020 in the framework of national post—Dieselgate investigations to reassess the excess NOx emissions from European diesel cars. This study is complemented by tests performed by independent third parties and by an analysis of ICCT’s own database of roadside measurements that collects a snapshot of the emissions of vehicles as they pass by.
The findings highlighted by the ICCT study are not new and are pointing to a legacy problem. Most of the worst results covered in the study relate to vehicles that were type—approved and therefore put on the market before the introduction of the real driving emission test. As such, this study is a reminder of Member States’ responsibility to take corrective action urgently, since for the fleet predating 1 September 2020, the responsibility to take action lies with the Member States who have the legal possibility and responsibility to act.
In this context, let me remind you that since 2015, the Commission services have organised multiple discussions with Member States’ authorities on the issue of prohibited defeat devices, reminding them of the obligation to investigate potential cases of non-compliance and to take all appropriate corrective measures. We have repeatedly called on Member States to carry out investigations into the possible presence of defeat devices in vehicles on their territories and to ensure that EU pollutant emission standards were scrupulously respected.
The Commission also requested Member States to identify the authors of the manipulations and apply national penalty procedures to sanction possible breaches of EU pollutant emissions rules. So far, Member States have reported on the ongoing review process on the issue of type approvals, and this has not yet led to withdrawals or sanctions.
And to finish, most recently, the Commission updated on 24 February 2023 its guidance on the identified action of the presence of defeat devices, which helps Member States to test vehicles for the identification of illegal defeat devices. The guidance helps interpreting the Commission’s long—standing position confirmed by the decisions of the Court of Justice on illegal defeat devices that vehicles need to comply with the emission requirements in normal use, and that exceptions to this rule, including thermal windows, must be interpreted narrowly."};"The text mentions electric vehicles (EVs) only once, in the following sentence:

""...including from electric vehicles, which sets new standards for air pollutant emissions from light and heavy duty vehicles...""

This is part of a proposal for Euro 7, which was adopted by the Commission in November 2022. The proposal aims to set new standards for air pollutant emissions from light and heavy-duty vehicles, including electric vehicles.

That's the only mention of electric vehicles in the text. There is no further information or discussion about EVs beyond this single sentence."};0;0;1;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2023-04-19_17-23";"Katarína Roth Neveďalová";"S&D";"
    Dear Madam President, in 2015, experts labeled the Dieselgate scandal as a turning point and they were right. The scandal eroded trust in diesel engines and triggered a strong push towards electric vehicles. We need to take into account the increased incentives and incentive prices for vehicles, because every new diesel car must refuel with AdBlue, whose price continues to rise. Last year, when it was 20 cents, today it is 70 cents and more, as it is produced from natural gas. New studies further show that emissions manipulation is still a reality. Three-quarters of European cars with diesel engines probably have installed equipment that influences the results of emission tests and artificially displays lower emission values. This is an enormous number of vehicles. They are tens of millions of cars that are still in circulation. We clearly consider this a betrayal of consumers' trust and the public, and authorities cannot continue to allow car manufacturers to go unpunished. In many cases related to this scandal, automakers in Europe have not been prosecuted or encouraged to take responsibility. Something similar could happen with the introduction of the discussed new emission standard Euro 7 and electric cars, where artificially reducing the impact on the environment can lead to consumers ultimately bearing the cost."};"According to the speech, experts labeled the Dieselgate scandal as a turning point in 2015, which triggered a strong push towards electric vehicles. This implies that the scandal led to an increased focus on electric vehicles as an alternative to diesel engines.

That's the only mention of electric vehicles in the text. There is no further information provided about electric vehicles, such as their benefits, features, or potential impact on the environment. The text simply mentions that the Dieselgate scandal led to a shift towards electric vehicles."};0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;
"2023-04-19_17-27";"Clara Aguilera";"S&D";"
    In writing. - Eight years after the Dieselgate scandal erupted, the International Council on Clean Transportation (ICCT) report has highlighted that more than 40% of cars in circulation in Europe still show ""extreme"" levels of nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions. The report's results indicate an extended presence of illegal devices, estimated at 16 million vehicles.
    This is a matter of concern for the health of European citizens, particularly in urban areas. It is necessary to redouble efforts to ensure compliance with existing legislation and guarantee that vehicles on European roads do not contain manipulation devices.
    Looking to the future, the Commission's proposal to establish the new Euro 7 standards, currently being debated by both co-legislators, envisages introducing more exhaustive assessment methods. Likewise, transitioning to electric vehicles will be a decisive step in reducing car and van emissions pollution."};"According to the text, it is mentioned that ""transitioning to electric vehicles will be a decisive step in reducing car and van emissions pollution"". This means that the report suggests that switching to electric vehicles could help reduce air pollution caused by cars and vans on European roads. That's the only mention of electric vehicles in the text."};0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2023-04-19_17-28";"César Luena";"S&D";"
    In writing. - Eight years after the Dieselgate scandal erupted, the International Council on Clean Transportation (ICCT) report has highlighted that more than 40% of cars in circulation in Europe still show ""extreme"" levels of nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions. The report's results indicate an extended presence of illegal devices, estimated at 16 million vehicles.
    This is a matter of concern for the health of European citizens, particularly in urban areas. It is necessary to redouble efforts to ensure compliance with existing legislation and guarantee that vehicles on European roads do not contain manipulation devices.
    Looking to the future, the Commission's proposal to establish the new Euro 7 standards, currently being debated by both co-legislators, envisages introducing more exhaustive assessment methods. Likewise, transitioning to electric vehicles will be a decisive step in reducing car and van emissions pollution."};"According to the text, it is mentioned that ""transitioning to electric vehicles will be a decisive step in reducing car and van emissions pollution"". This means that the report suggests that switching to electric vehicles could help reduce air pollution caused by cars and vans on European roads. That's the only mention of electric vehicles in the text."};0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2023-04-19_17-29";"Cristina Maestre Martín De Almagro";"S&D";"
    In writing. - Eight years after the Dieselgate scandal erupted, the International Council on Clean Transportation (ICCT) report has highlighted that more than 40% of cars in circulation in Europe still show ""extreme"" levels of nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions. The report's results indicate an extended presence of illegal devices, estimated at 16 million vehicles.
    This is a matter of concern for the health of European citizens, particularly in urban areas. It is necessary to redouble efforts to ensure compliance with existing legislation and guarantee that vehicles on European roads do not contain manipulation devices.
    Looking to the future, the Commission's proposal to establish the new Euro 7 standards, currently being debated by both co-legislators, envisages introducing more exhaustive assessment methods. Likewise, transitioning to electric vehicles will be a decisive step in reducing car and van emissions pollution."};"According to the text, it is mentioned that ""transitioning to electric vehicles will be a decisive step in reducing car and van emissions pollution"". This means that the report suggests that switching to electric vehicles could help reduce air pollution caused by cars and vans on European roads. That's the only mention of electric vehicles in the text."};0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2023-04-20_3-32";"Jean-Paul Garraud";"ID";"
    Mr. President, in order to combat climate change, the European Union wishes once again to take coercive measures for our populations.
    At the hypocrites' ball, Brussels Europe is queen. She bans the sale of thermal engine cars to promote electric vehicles whose polluting batteries are imported from the other end of the world. She imposes energy-saving renovation of buildings in Europe, but at the same time adopts a free trade agreement with New Zealand and pushes for that with Mercosur - two ecological aberrations. She sacrifices nuclear power, carbon-free and cheap energy, which ensured France an entirely abandoned energy independence under the presidencies of Hollande and Macron, to the detriment of our fellow citizens.
    Contrary to my Macronist colleague Canfin, there is no question for us of promoting more renewables by the side of highways, in fields and at sea - as he wishes. This is eco-bobo delirium. Wanting to make peoples happy against their will is profoundly undemocratic. For Brussels, it doesn't matter if European citizens are subjected to even more coercive measures, unsustainable financially. In the end, it's always the same who toast: the middle and working classes, who are victims of ecological dogmas.
    Yet Europe makes considerable efforts in terms of ecology, while China, India, and the United States are the planet's main polluters. Why should Europeans pay for the whole world when they are the best students in the class? The efforts they make will have no influence on the climate crisis as long as other powers and emerging countries do not do the same. If ecology could be disconnected from ideology, if constraints targeted the biggest polluters, our old Earth would fare infinitely better."};"According to the speech, the European Union bans the sale of thermal engine cars to promote electric vehicles. However, it is mentioned that these polluting batteries are imported from the other end of the world. This implies that the speaker criticizes the EU's approach to promoting electric vehicles, suggesting that the environmental benefits may be outweighed by the negative impact of importing batteries from distant locations."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;
"2023-04-20_3-58";"Nicolas Schmit";"NA";" Member of the Commission. – Madam President, dear Members, thank you for this very important debate and exchange of views. I just noticed that there is quite large agreement, first, on the urgency, on the urgency of the problem, on the urgency for action. And bold action. I agree. And the fact that we are facing an unmeasurable challenge.
Anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions have warmed the climate at an unprecedented rate. And there’s just now a report coming out showing that the last eight years have been the hottest years since temperature is measured. So there is an issue. There is a problem. And global greenhouse gas emissions continue to increase with unequal contribution across regions and households.
I’ve said there is a large agreement, but there are also voices contesting, a sort of climate negationism making us or making people believe that this is not true against the facts, against science. And this reminds me a bit about the debate Galileo had some centuries ago when the Inquisition tried to convince him by threatening him. And he also we hear some threats that the sun was turning around the earth and the earth was just flat. Well, we have to fight this, absolutely, because this is fake news. It is dangerous information because it they really cheating on our population and on citizens.
The European Green Deal places environmental concerns and planetary health at the centre of EU policy attention. Arriving amid the global energy crisis, the IPCC’S messages confirm the need for the EU to stay at the forefront of the fight against climate change by progressing with its efforts to become climate neutral, climate resilient and to accelerate the clean energy transition.
I also have heard that finally it’s just Europe taking care of the climate. This is not exactly true. When we look around what happens in the US, when we look around even what happens in China – and certainly there are still a lot of shortcomings there – well, we see that they invest massively in climate technologies. And the real risk is not that we are losing the competition because we are investing in climate, but that we are losing the competition because we do not invest enough in climate technologies. That’s why, by the way, the Commission has proposed now a clean industry strategy, and we have to convince our industry to invest more. And all these ideas that we can delay on electric cars and on renewable energy are extremely dangerous ideas because they are weakening the competition, our competitiveness in the world economy, where a lot of actors are going in the other direction.
We have to clearly state that fossil energy has no future, not just because of Russia, certainly also because of Russia, but this energy has no future. And it is wrong! And when I listen also to this theory that we are renouncing to our prosperity, no, we have to build a new prosperity. And this prosperity can be richer, better, better quality of life and fairer.
And I fully agree there is no climate policy without a strong social dimension. And this is possible. There are already in the package a lot of good initiatives like the Climate Social Fund, but also our social policy has to go along very strictly, very tightly linked with our climate policy. And this is the way we can convince our citizens, and especially the most vulnerable, that climate policy is good for them because we have strong social policies and fairness in our society. And I have to say, yes, when I look at the results of some companies, especially those specialising in fossil fuels, with high and the highest earnings in the last years, well, there is something to do about that. There is some redistribution to do about that. And I think the Commission has already also given some indication on that.
I also heard it asked what we will do after because we have an objective, an intermediary objective and a final objective. But it is important also to go further and to see what we should do in the perspective of 2040. In line with the European Climate Law the Commission will present an impact assessment next spring with a proposal for the EU’s intermediate climate target for 2040. A public consultation on the EU’s climate target for 2040 is open for contributions until 24 June 2023, and that 2040 target will be an important milestone for strengthening climate action and achieving climate neutrality. We need to ensure that the EU is on track and remains on track to meet its own domestic climate objective for 2050, and especially also globally: we have to be a strong voice globally. We have to show that what is at stake is really the survival of mankind."};"The text does not explicitly mention electric vehicles, but it mentions ""electric cars"" as an idea that should be avoided because it would weaken Europe's competitiveness in the world economy.

In the context of the speech, the speaker is arguing against delaying investments in climate technologies, including renewable energy and clean industry strategies. They suggest that such delays would put Europe at a disadvantage compared to other countries like the US and China, which are investing heavily in these areas.

The mention of ""electric cars"" is likely meant to illustrate the idea that some people might propose delaying or slowing down efforts to transition to cleaner energy sources, including electric vehicles. The speaker is arguing against such ideas, emphasizing the need for bold action to address climate change and stay competitive globally."};0;1;1;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2023-05-08_11-16";"Markus Buchheit";"ID";"
    Ladies and gentlemen, the green, good 11 million dollar heavy NGO Clean Air Task Force seems to have written the basis for the compromise amendments to the current report despite the denial by the green rapporteur Paulus. This is also supported by a meeting between the deputy and the aforementioned lobby organization, as well as by reports from Politico and the magazine The European Conservative, and finally by the entries in the metatext of the compromise amendments themselves.
    My ladies and gentlemen, lobbying and the invisible influence of NGOs on the legislative process must finally come to an end. The otherwise so jovially civil-minded Greens are not civil or even popular, they are in fact students and apprentices of a murky NGO industry - by the way, the only industry that really matters to them. They do not represent the interests of those who have elected them. They represent the interests of a small, well if hardly transparently paid elite and define with these well-situated world improvers goals that they want to impose on whole peoples and industrial sectors until in the end every last cent is squeezed out of our pockets. With this hypocrisy, it must finally be put to an end here once and for all!
    Of course, within the framework of the methane strategy, agriculture will also be targeted and thus further harassed. If you have thought that the methane strategy, electromobility, in short: the Green Deal would be part of a deindustrialization campaign as part of a Morgenthau Plan 2.0, then you are completely wrong. This plan would at least have left us the agriculture."};"The text mentions ""electromobility"" as part of the Green Deal, but it does not provide any further details or information about electric vehicles. The mention of electromobility is brief and seems to be used as an example of a policy initiative that is part of the broader Green Deal agenda."};0;1;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2023-05-09_7-2";"Olaf Scholz";"NA";"
    Federal Chancellor of the Federal Republic of Germany. – Madam President, esteemed ladies and gentlemen members of parliament, my ladies and gentlemen! Thank you very much for the opportunity to speak here today on Europe Day in this special place. Your invitation honors and touches me. It honors me because as an elected representative of 450 million European women and men - and thus the citizens of Europe. And it touches me because May 9th is the only right, future-oriented answer to the war unleashed by Germany, destructive nationalism and imperialist megalomania.
    Today, 73 years ago, the French Foreign Minister Robert Schuman proposed to create a new, ""organized and living Europe"". At the beginning was the pooling of coal and steel, the goods that for decades served the production of weapons. Weapons with which our grandfathers and great-grandfathers shot at each other. The dream of the fathers and mothers of Europe was to put an end to this mutual killing once and for all. This dream has become a reality for us. War between our peoples is unimaginable - thanks to the European Union and to us all.
    But a look into the immediate neighborhood of our union shows in a terrible way: Not in all countries of Europe is this dream also reality. Under great sacrifices, people in Ukraine defend their freedom and democracy, their sovereignty and independence against a brutal Russian invasion army every day. We support them.
    The founding fathers and mothers already assigned to the emerging Europe a task that goes far beyond its self-pacification. For them, it was clear: Europe bears global responsibility because the well-being of Europe is not separable from the well-being of the rest of the world!
    In the Schuman Declaration it sounds like this: ""This production"" - meant coal and steel - ""will be made available to the whole world without exception and exception in order to promote the improvement of living conditions and the promotion of peace work. Europe will then, with increased means, be able to pursue the fulfillment of one of its essential tasks: the development of the African part.""
    This ""development of the African part"" was originally above all the colonial exploitation of our neighboring continent by Europe. Therefore, overcoming the consequences of colonialism must be a feature of every European partnership with the countries of Africa, Asia and Latin America, a partnership that renounces Eurocentrism not only in words but also in deeds. Such partnerships to build seem to me today more important than ever.
    450 - after another enlargement maybe 500 million citizens live in the European Union. That makes just five percent of the world's population. In Asia, Africa and South America new economic, demographic and political heavyweights are emerging - a success of the division of labor between countries and continents that has led a billion people out of poverty. They will not accept a bipolar or tripolar world order. That is why I am convinced: The world of the 21st century will be multipolar - it is already so. 
    What does all this mean for us in Europe? ""Europe,"" I quote the French writer Paul Valéry, ""is what it really is: a small peninsula, a cape of the Asian mainland?"" The answer to that question we do not find by looking back. Those who nostalgically chase after the dream of European world power or serve national great-power fantasies are stuck in the past. And those who constantly warn about Europe's decline, without winning the future, also underestimate something: how transformable and capable of action Europe is.
    We have proven this over and over again in the crises of recent years and the present. Just think of how we have come through the past winter together, solidarily and united with partners worldwide. The three lessons from that are as follows: Firstly, Europe's future is in our hands. Secondly, the more united we build up Europe, the easier it is to secure a good future. And thirdly, less closure, but more openness, more cooperation are the order of the day. To ensure that Europe has a good place in the world of tomorrow, not above and below other countries and regions, but on an equal footing with others, at their side.
    For this, the European Union must change. We need a geopolitical European Union, an expanded and reformed European Union and, last but not least, a future-oriented European Union.
    In all of this, I see the European Parliament as a driving force and an ally. The creation of a geopolitical Europe: Here, before the European Parliament, Willy Brandt already testified to its existential necessity 50 years ago. ""The unification of Europe,"" he wrote to us back then, ""is not only a question of the quality of our existence. It is a question of survival between the giants and in the fractured world of young and old nationalisms."" The European Parliament has always acted according to this maxim - and for that I thank you very much. You act accordingly when you uphold the strength of law and when you remind us all time and again that Europe only hears when it speaks with one voice.
    Finally, Russia's brutal attack war against Ukraine has shown all of us how indispensable this insight is. And accordingly, the European Union has rarely been as united as after this infamous breach of the European and international peace order. On this experience, a geopolitical Europe can be founded. As I suggested during my visit to Charles University in Prague last summer, some proposals include much closer interlocking of our defense efforts and building an integrated European defense economy. The European Peace Facility, joint procurement of ammunition for Ukraine, closer cooperation between many of our countries in air defense, our Strategic Compass, close cooperation between NATO and the European Union - all this are correct approaches that we want to deepen and accelerate.
    Already now, we must set the course for the reconstruction of Ukraine. Yes, that requires political and financial capital - and that on very long-term. And at the same time, there is a great opportunity - not only for Ukraine, but for Europe as a whole, because a prosperous, democratic, European Ukraine is the clearest rejection of Putin's imperial, revisionist, lawless policy on our continent. 
    Even in the global competition with other major powers, Europe must stand its ground. The United States remain Europe's most important ally. And in this regard, the more we now invest in our security and defense - in civilian resilience, in technological sovereignty, in reliable supply chains, in our independence in critical raw materials - the better partners for our transatlantic friends we become. Our relationship with China is aptly described by the trio ""partner, competitor, systemic rival"" - while the competition and rivalry from China's side have undoubtedly increased. This is what the EU sees, and this is how the European Union reacts. With Ursula von der Leyen, I agree: no decoupling, but smart de-risking is the motto!
    The countries of the Global South are new partners whose concerns and legitimate interests we must take seriously. Therefore, it is all the more important that Europe acts in solidarity and with determination for food security and poverty alleviation. It is essential that we uphold the promises we have given in international climate and environmental protection. And this also belongs to a geopolitical Europe: it is more than reasonable that we now quickly conclude new free trade agreements - with Mercosur, with Mexico, with India, Indonesia, Australia, Kenya, and prospectively with many other countries.
    (Applause)
    Agree on treaties that promote the economic development of our partners, not hinder them! Fair means, for example, that the first processing of raw materials takes place on site and not in China or elsewhere. If we anchor this idea in our trade relations, we thus make a considerable contribution to diversifying our supply chains.
    Europe must turn its attention to the world. Because if we continue to negotiate unsuccessfully for years about new free trade agreements, then in the future others will dictate the rules - with lower environmental and social standards. A central decision on the shape of a geopolitical Europe has already been made last year. And in this regard, the European Parliament was a driving force. We have decided on a large Europe. We have told the citizens of the Western Balkan states, Ukraine, Moldova, and prospectively also Georgia: You belong to us.
    (Applause)
    We want you to become part of our European Union! And this is not about altruism. It's about credibility and economic reasonableness. And it's about securing peace in Europe after the time of Russia's attack war, ensuring its stability.
    A geopolitical Europe also measures itself by whether it keeps its promises to its immediate neighborhood. An honest enlargement policy puts its promises into action - above all towards the states of the Western Balkans, to whom we have promised EU membership for 20 years. Of course, the normalization process between Serbia and Kosovo must continue and reforms in the candidate countries must be carried out. Of course, a swift progress in North Macedonia's accession must be followed by political courage.
    (Applause)
    Such progress must then also be honored by us, otherwise the enlargement policy loses its incentive and the European Union loses influence and radiation. To honesty: An enlarged European Union must be a reformed EU. Note well: The enlargement should not only be the reason for reforms, but their goal. 
    I explicitly welcome the fact that the European Parliament is working on proposals for institutional reforms, even those that do not hold up in front of the Parliament itself. I will continue to advocate in the European Council for dealing with these ideas. Some are obvious: more Council decisions with qualified majority in foreign policy and taxation.
    (Applause)
    For this, I will continue to carry out persuasion work. And I am very grateful for broad support from your ranks. To the skeptics, I say: It is not consensus or 100% agreement on all decisions that creates the greatest democratic legitimacy. On the contrary! It is precisely the advocating and struggling for majorities and alliances that characterizes us as democrats and Democrats, the search for compromises that also take into account the interests of minorities. Exactly this corresponds to our understanding of liberal democracy!
    In addition, it seems essential to me for the future that we insist on respecting democratic principles and the rule of law within the EU. And I see a large majority of you on my side there. Why not use the upcoming discussion on European Union reforms to strengthen the European Commission in initiating infringement proceedings whenever our fundamental values are violated: freedom, democracy, equality, the rule of law, and respect for human rights?
    (Applause)
    My ladies and gentlemen, one more element must be added - I have already mentioned it: We Europeans must open up to the future without ifs and buts. That means, first of all, clearing away the old problems that have been crippling us for years, which cause other countries to split us easily and play us off against each other. I think, for example, of our handling of refugee migration. Of course, a solution must ultimately be found that meets the claim of European solidarity. But we should not wait until this solidarity comes like the Holy Ghost upon us.
    Europe, as Robert Schuman put it 73 years ago, arises through ""concrete facts"", through ""solidarity in action"". That is why I urgently advocate for bringing forward the progress made in reforming the Common European Asylum System in the Council after long and difficult negotiations before the European election. Your agreement on a common position for central parts of the reform last month was an important step in this direction. Now let's work with all our might to bring it to a conclusion.
    (Applause)
    We share the goal of better managing irregular migration and ordering it without betraying our values. In this, we can use much more than before: In many parts of Europe, there is now an urgent need for labor, including from third countries. If we consistently link regular migration chances with the demand that origin and transit countries take back those who have no right to stay here, then everyone benefits. Measures for an effective external border protection also belong here - as we agreed in the European Council in February. Then there is growing acceptance for a sensible, controlled, and monitored immigration in our countries. And then we deprive those who make politics with fear and resentment of their basis. 
    Opening the future to us means also tackling the biggest task that lies ahead of us, which is the awakening of our countries, our economies and societies into a climate-neutral future. The first industrial revolution began here in Europe. Must it not be our ambition for Europe to significantly shape the next great change - to the benefit of all? What opportunities this awakening brings for Europe, I do not have to explain to you. What is important is that the citizens of our countries feel this in their everyday lives, for example because cheaper electricity from renewable energies will be available in the future, because there are enough charging stations for electric cars and trucks all over Europe, because new, promising jobs are emerging in the energy sector or in the semiconductor industry, because we develop and market the technologies here in Europe that the whole world needs for the transition to climate neutrality.
    
    To shape this transformation ambitiously and at the same time not to leave anyone behind - that is the great future project that we should now gather as Europeans around.
(Applause)
    As Oscar Wilde would say: ""The future belongs to those who recognize opportunities before they become obvious."" The future does not belong to nostalgics or revisionists, dreaming of national glory or craving for imperial power.
(Applause)
    The Ukrainian women and men are paying with their lives for this delusion of their powerful neighbor. 2,200 kilometers northeast of here, in Moscow, Putin is marching his soldiers, tanks, and rockets today. Let us not be intimidated by such power! Let us remain steadfast in our support for Ukraine - as long as it is necessary! After all, no one wants to go back to the time when the right of the stronger ruled, when smaller countries had to bow to larger ones, when freedom was a privilege for fewer and not a fundamental right for all. Our European Union - united in its diversity - is the best insurance that this past will not return. And therefore, the message of May 9th is not what is heard today from Moscow, but our message, and it reads: The past will not triumph over the future. And our future - our European Union.
(The members stand up from their seats and applaud the speaker.)"};"In the speech, it is mentioned that ""cheaper electricity from renewable energies will be available in the future"" and that there will be ""enough charging stations for electric cars and trucks all over Europe"". This suggests that the speaker is referring to the development of electric vehicles as part of a broader effort to transition to a climate-neutral future. The text does not provide further details about electric vehicles, but rather presents them as one aspect of a larger vision for a sustainable and environmentally-friendly European Union."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2023-05-09_20-30";"Josianne Cutajar";"S&D";"in writing. – There is no European transition without European citizens. We are preparing the EU for the net zero industries, for sustainable transport, for new technologies. It is time we plan ahead to ensure that all these create opportunities, jobs and incentives for workers of all ages, especially those incurring additional difficulties when it comes to entering the labour market. This strategy must include people with disabilities, those without much formal education, women and the elderly. 
The European Year of Skills should be an opportunity for the EU and its Member States to invest in adequate and evenly—matched skills, empowering individuals and entrepreneurs to participate in our society and market. This must be done through education and partnerships between all stakeholders – governments, schools, universities and the industry, developing curricula aligned with the challenges and opportunities faced, as well as the sustainable and digital skills needed. It must also be done through facilitating the employment of skilled individuals. 
The Year of Skills should additionally put value in the role that regional programmes and cohesion policy can play in addressing the shortage of staff and skills in heavily affected sectors and regions, to ensure that we really leave no one behind."};"There is no mention of electric vehicles in the provided speech. The text only discusses European transition, sustainable transport, new technologies, skills, education, employment, and regional programs, but does not specifically mention electric vehicles."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2023-05-09_21-5";"Arba Kokalari";"EPP";"
    For the PPE group. - Madam President! If Europe is to cope with climate change, it must be easier to trade in climate-smart goods and services. But we have a problem because the EU has no credibility to stop greenwashing when we have greenwashing in this Parliament: It is the Greens and their group, the Green Party. Despite having a high tail when it comes to climate issues, they are driving an advertising ban on solar panels and electric cars, trying to stop environmental labels, and wanting to ban companies from climate compensation.
    
    How can we make it easier for consumers to find eco-friendly baby food and environmentally friendly laundry detergent without environmental labels? How can we manage electrification without allowing companies to advertise solar panels? How can we encourage businesses to take climate responsibility if they are not allowed to talk about their sustainability work?
    
    I think it should be easy to do the right thing. It must be more profitable for businesses to be climate-smart, and it must be easier for consumers to buy sustainable goods. We need to stop greenwashing, whether it comes from companies or from environmentalists' politicians."};"According to the speech, the Green Party (a group within the European Parliament) is trying to stop advertising of electric cars. This means that they are advocating for a ban on companies promoting their electric vehicles through advertisements."};0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2023-05-09_21-11";"Marcel de Graaff";"NI";" – Chairman, consumers are not poorly informed about the environmental effects of products. No, consumers are blatantly deceived. Even stronger, the EU itself lies and deceives about agricultural production, CO2, diesel and gasoline cars, to pressure the climate agenda.
    Farmers contribute to greening. CO2 helps plants grow better and electric cars are dirtier than diesels or gasoline cars. But for the batteries of electric cars, the EU has children work in cobalt mines. Solar panels contain heavily toxic lead and cadmium, and decommissioned wind turbines, full of sulfur hexafluoride, are buried because recycling is too expensive.
    The EU must stop with climate dictatorship, which robs citizens of their last cents and freedom, and stop the dispossessing of farmers."};"According to the speech, it is claimed that:

* Electric cars are ""dirtier"" than diesel or gasoline cars.
* The batteries of electric cars require cobalt, which is mined by children.

That's all the information about electric vehicles mentioned in the text."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2023-05-10_15-7";"Rosa D'Amato";"Greens/EFA";"
    In the name of the Verts/ALE group. - Mr. President, Mr. Commissioner, Madam Minister, honorable colleagues, two years ago in Porto, heads of state made great promises on the need to strengthen the social dimension of Europe. Two years later, there is no concrete measure to respond to rampant poverty, the erosion of the purchasing power of millions of families, and the growing gap between territories.
    For the Greens/European Free Alliance, it is essential to review the Stability and Growth Pact, enough with strangling development and convergence with austerity measures.
    Fiscal rules must serve to invest in green and social initiatives, in essential services such as health, education, sustainable transport. Otherwise, territorial and social gaps will continue to grow.
    It is urgent for there to be a European directive on the minimum wage above the poverty threshold, because it is an effective measure against poverty.
    As well as being urgent for there to be a European directive so that internships for our young people are paid and of quality, putting an end to abusive practices throughout Europe and blocking the brain drain.
    Only if we start investing in people can we create a resilient and sustainable society, both economically and socially.
    The end-of-May summit is an important opportunity: review the treaties and put social rights at the center. Europe has a future only with a new and ambitious social pact, it is the only possible response to the crisis we are experiencing."};"There is no mention of electric vehicles in the provided speech. The text discusses topics such as poverty, austerity measures, social initiatives, minimum wage, internships, and sustainable transport, but does not specifically mention electric vehicles."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2023-06-12_13-12";"Stefania Zambelli";"ID";"
    In writing. – Today is an important day, as we celebrate World Day Against Child Labor. On this occasion, I would like to ask some questions to my European environmental colleagues: do you know that in Congo, 40,000 children work in mines to extract cobalt? Cobalt is the basic element of batteries, including those of your smartphones and electric cars, which you want to impose on all European citizens by 2035.
    Do you know that while we are here discussing to achieve green goals, many other countries around the world are implementing green policies and have children collect cotton for your clothes? They do this because thanks to their ""small hands"" they can do it better.
    It is easy to fill one's mouth with terms like ecology, green, transition to green, but we must also be aware of the consequences of these terms. Instead of blocking companies, streets and highways across Europe in the name of crazy policies, go protest in those countries where for these children there are no days off or holidays, and they are treated like slaves.
    Dear colleagues, while we are here talking, millions of children continue to work to support these absurd green policies."};"According to the speech, it is mentioned that cobalt, which is extracted from mines in Congo where 40,000 children work, is also used in batteries of electric cars. The speaker is criticizing European environmental colleagues for wanting to impose electric cars on all European citizens by 2035 without considering the consequences of their actions."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2023-06-12_17-7";"Stéphanie Yon-Courtin";"Renew";" On behalf of the Renew Group. - Mr. President, Madam Vice-President, Mr. Rapporteur, dear colleagues, the annual exercise of the competition policy report allows us to pay tribute to all the work of the European Commission, and even more so in recent months, during which competition has been at the heart of the response to the pandemic and the energy crisis.
    This is also an opportunity to recall the role of our competition rules in the double transition, green and digital, and the resilience of our single market, because, yes, competition policy - as you reminded us, Madam Vice-President - is one of the means to achieve the ambitious goals we have set ourselves democratically. But we will only achieve our strategic autonomy by aligning all our European policies and our toolbox. With the regulation on foreign subsidies, we have finally said stop to unfair competition from third countries and we must now deliver concrete results on these priorities for our citizens and our businesses - the end of internal combustion engine cars will be a real test. Our new rules must protect us from unfair competition from cheap Chinese electric cars, heavily subsidized by China, which would flood the European market.
    Within our single market, how can we ensure fair competition between our European companies if we do not accelerate on the sovereign fund, which would compensate for any possible disparities in state aid? Our European response to the US law on reducing inflation must be accompanied by this financial component.
    In digital sovereignty, the regulation on the digital market remedies the limits of our competition law to adapt it to current challenges. The time has come for concrete implementation of this act. We must also rethink fair remuneration for networks. It is necessary to ensure that a handful of companies cannot monopolize exponential data traffic without effectively contributing to the infrastructures they use."};"According to the speech, it is mentioned that:

* The end of internal combustion engine cars will be a real test for European policies.
* There are concerns about unfair competition from cheap Chinese electric cars, heavily subsidized by China, which would flood the European market.

In summary, the text expresses worries about the potential impact of Chinese electric vehicles on the European market due to alleged subsidies and the need for fair competition."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;
"2023-06-12_18-8";"Mikuláš Peksa";"Greens/EFA";" For the Verts/ALE group. - Madam President, esteemed ladies and gentlemen, distinguished colleagues, we certainly need major transport infrastructure for the development and transport accessibility of European regions as well as to ensure better connectivity between East and West and North and South of Europe. The development of our railways will also help us get closer to climate goals and their implementation. That is why I am pleased that this report includes, among other things, recommendations to increase the availability of international night trains, which represent a more sustainable transport alternative, for example, compared to air travel. However, we should also talk about how to ensure financing. Critically, we need to speed up construction in strategically important directions, such as through the Czech Republic to Poland and further to Ukraine. The problem is that in countries that systematically undermine the rule of law, construction costs are inflated and some transport projects are overpriced just so that the pockets of local corrupt politicians and oligarchs can be filled. For citizens, however, such projects lose their added value and it's just a waste of European money. The European Court of Auditors confirms that control of costs and revenues when selecting projects is not sufficient, and the Commission does not carry out any feedback or evaluation of projects and their actual results. So what we need is not only financing but also a more transparent way to control the money we are already spending."};"There is no mention of electric vehicles in the provided speech. The text only discusses transport infrastructure, railways, night trains, air travel, and financing for transport projects, but does not mention electric vehicles at all."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2023-06-13_15-2";"Achille Variati";"NA";"
    Speaker. - Madam President, esteemed colleagues, first of all, I would like to thank the various Council Presidencies with whom we have had the opportunity to work over these almost two and a half years of negotiation, in particular the Czech Presidency with which we reached a negotiated agreement on this regulation. A thank you also to Commissioner Sinkevičius, Commissioner Breton, and your Directorates-General for their precious support during the negotiations. Finally, a sincere thank you to the entire negotiation team for the constructive atmosphere on such a crucial file for the EU economy.
    
    Looking around us, we can see how the use of batteries is already an integral part of our daily lives and will become even more so in the coming years to achieve climate neutrality by 2050. Mobility will be increasingly sustainable, our cities will be smarter and smarter, and to focus even more on renewable energy sources, we will need batteries more and more.
    
    In a word, batteries are the pillar on which to build the new sustainable development paradigm. The goal we wanted to give with this regulation is to produce the most sustainable batteries in Europe at the global level. To do this, we have defined measures for the first time that cover the entire life cycle of a product, from production to disposal. It is no coincidence that this holistic approach has been adopted for the first time for a product like batteries, which will see their use and application in new sectors increase significantly in the coming years.
    
    For example, it is estimated that battery usage for electric vehicles alone will increase by 15 times between 20 and 35. Without counting that today, lighter means of transport are spreading more and more. These data, however, make us understand how the use of so-called critical raw materials, such as lithium, nickel or cobalt, will increase in parallel.
    
    We know very well that Europe is poor in these raw materials and today dependent on imports. To ensure strategic autonomy, this new battery regulation wants to take advantage of the potential of new technologies, creating a regulatory framework to encourage industrialization policies based on sustainability and circularity principles.
    
    We want to avoid repeating the mistakes of the past, such as when solar panels were incentivized in their purchase but not regulated in production or disposal, ending up benefiting only the Chinese economy. In more detail, the regulation under approval establishes requirements for design, labeling, or homologation, end-of-life cycle. The maximum carbon footprint, minimum material recycled content, performance standards and durability are the main sustainability requirements introduced for the first time for batteries, which must become a benchmark for the entire global market and must be applied to any type of battery commercialized in the European market, including those imported from non-EU countries.
    
    The implications will not only be industrial and commercial. For individual users, there will also be significant changes, starting with the possibility of removing batteries themselves, which will become mandatory, passing through a clearer, transparent, and understandable labeling for the user, and through the creation of a digital passport for batteries.
    
    Improvements will also be seen on the recycling front, starting from the robust objectives for the collection of portable battery waste, to the challenging percentages set for the recovery of each component of the batteries, especially lithium.  The Parliament has insisted on strengthening, in addition to the environmental aspect, also the dimension of social rights linked to the production of batteries. We have made for the first time the two-diligence obligation mandatory for a specific product, with all batteries introduced onto the market covered by these new rules. A real step forward towards more ethical batteries. This is therefore an important regulation and I invite Parliament to vote on it as compactly as the vote in committee has been so compact."};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned regarding electric vehicles:

* It is estimated that battery usage for electric vehicles alone will increase by 15 times between 2020 and 2035.
* This growth in demand for batteries will lead to an increase in the use of critical raw materials such as lithium, nickel, or cobalt.

These points highlight the growing importance of electric vehicles in the context of sustainable mobility and the need for responsible sourcing of raw materials to support this growth."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;
"2023-06-13_15-4";"Antonius Manders";"NA";"
    Rapporteur IMCO. - Mr. Chairman, Commissioner, Mr. Variati, rapporteur, I would like to express special thanks to Simona Bonafè and her assistant Marco, of course, especially because they have taken up a number of points from the Internal Market Committee that are very important for this file.
    
    I mention the national battery help centers to help small and medium-sized enterprises with the implementation of batteries and their use. The test centers in the EU. Research into consumer battery charge systems, because we still throw away too many batteries and it is good that there will be research to find out if that can be changed. Especially also smart charging of electric vehicles that can load bidirectionally in the future. But also that electric vehicles can be connected to buildings where solar panels charge the car during the day and the car supplies the building with energy at night. But finally and perhaps most importantly: the introduction of a universal charger suitable for different product categories such as garden tools, kitchen appliances, phones, etc. As for phones, it has taken thirteen years. I hope that universal chargers for these products will be much faster.
    
    And I would like to make one more remark before concluding. In addition to these batteries, it is extremely important to also ensure that the networks can provide enough power. Because I hear many companies complain that we need smart solutions. They cannot connect electric trucks because there is not enough power on the networks."};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned related to electric vehicles:

1. Smart charging of electric vehicles: It is mentioned that electric vehicles will be able to load bidirectionally in the future.
2. Vehicle-to-Grid (V2G) technology: The speaker mentions that electric vehicles can be connected to buildings where solar panels charge the car during the day and the car supplies the building with energy at night.

These are the only points mentioned about electric vehicles in the text."};0;0;0;0;1;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2023-06-13_15-5";"Virginijus Sinkevičius";"NA";" Member of the Commission. – Madam President, honourable Members, good afternoon. And I would like to first of all, of course, thank the European Parliament for all the hard work on this file.
We have come a long way since the Commission presented its proposal on batteries two and a half years ago, bringing together the European Green Deal and our industrial strategy. And I have to say that I am very pleased with the outcome. Our transformation to a circular and climate—neutral economy must be powered by sustainable batteries. They are essential for the green and digital transition of key sectors like mobility, energy and communication. And we have now sound rules and a powerful legislative toolbox firmly oriented to the future. We ensure that batteries will have a low carbon footprint and that they will be collected, reused and recycled, and the valuable materials that batteries contain will be then used to produce new batteries.
This regulation is an excellent example of the change we want to make through our circular economy agenda. It is fully in line with Europe’s drive towards open strategic autonomy. It strengthens the security of supply for raw materials and energy, which is now more important than ever before. And I would like to thank the rapporteur, the shadow rapporteurs and everyone else in the European Parliament who has been actively involved in this file. Equally I would like to thank all the Presidency teams of the Council. Today our great work together and tremendous efforts are bearing fruit and this agreement is extremely timely. Many business decisions, investments are informed by the new regulatory framework, so we should now move swiftly towards implementation and the work on that is already well under way.
New standardisation rules to support the regulation will soon go ahead. We are also drawing up rules for the carbon footprint, for electric vehicles, for electric vehicle batteries and much more is also on the way.
If I have one small regret, it is the deadlines for the tasks given to the Commission. They are very tight and we will do our best to meet them. But as previously noted, I will ask for a statement be added to the minutes expressing our concern about the timeline of our implementation work.
Having said that, I would like to recognise the improvements of the text of the regulation that happened in the course of the legislative process. The substantial clarification of the legal framework for second—life batteries is one of those examples. There are many other examples and they demonstrate how much of a collective effort this regulation really was. It is the finest example of our interinstitutional cooperation, and I am extremely grateful for that. So, congratulations to you all once again, and thank you."};"According to the speech, it is mentioned that new rules are being drawn up for:

* Carbon footprint of electric vehicles
* Electric vehicle batteries

This is stated in the following sentence: ""We are also drawing up rules for the carbon footprint, for electric vehicles, for electric vehicle batteries and much more is also on the way.""

That's all the information provided about electric vehicles in the text."};0;0;1;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;
"2023-06-13_15-6";"Erik Bergkvist";"NA";"rapporteur for the opinion of the Committee on Transport and Tourism. – Madam President, Members of Parliament, we are in the middle of our biggest and most important transition, the transition to a green society. Batteries have played a crucial role and will play an even more crucial role in this transition. In the transport sector, we can see how batteries are now powering electric cars, e-bikes, e-scooters, hybrid ferries, and soon also commercial aviation. But we are not self-sufficient enough on these minerals and in the Critical Raw Materials Act, we will look at how we can recycle more as we do in this act. And we will also see how we can extract these minerals as careful as possible and also together with the local population, extract these minerals and create the largest possible regional development. Batteries are truly powering the green transition. "};"According to the speech, batteries are playing a crucial role in the transition to a green society, particularly in the transport sector. Specifically, it mentions that:

* Batteries are powering electric cars
* Batteries are also powering e-bikes and e-scooters
* Hybrid ferries are also being powered by batteries
* The speaker notes that commercial aviation will soon also be using batteries

Overall, the text highlights the importance of batteries in enabling the transition to a green society, particularly in the transport sector where electric vehicles are becoming increasingly prominent."};0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;1;
"2023-06-13_15-15";"Mario Furore";"NI";" – Madam President, esteemed colleagues, the agreement reached with the Council indicates the right path on which to move and I am happy to support it. It is estimated that by 2027 European countries may cover 100% of the demand for lithium batteries for electric vehicles with local factories. For this goal, however, we need one more step: ensuring that the European industry becomes self-sufficient in battery production and is at the forefront of reuse and recycling of materials.
    The European Battery Innovation Project is a first step to make us independent from the current Asian dominance and it is particularly urgent and important for us to define the best and quickly a new industrial policy accompanied by incentives and funding for companies. We must support technological innovation and the construction of a battery value chain within the EU. The European potential is enormous, and it is our task to strengthen the European supply chains linked to the battery market."};"According to the speech, by 2027, European countries are estimated to cover 100% of the demand for lithium batteries for electric vehicles with local factories. This means that Europe will be self-sufficient in producing lithium batteries for electric vehicles, which is a significant development.

In summary, the text mentions that:

* By 2027, European countries may cover 100% of the demand for lithium batteries for electric vehicles with local factories.
* This goal requires ensuring that the European industry becomes self-sufficient in battery production and at the forefront of reuse and recycling of materials."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;
"2023-06-13_15-17";"Christel Schaldemose";"S&D";" – Madam President! Batteries are a crucial piece in the green transition. They make up, as it were, the fuel tank of our electric cars and eventually also our trucks. They are crucial for future energy storage of sun and wind, and therefore we must get better at reusing them. Batteries are filled with strategically important materials such as cobalt, lithium, nickel etc. These are materials that we do not have access to enough in Europe. We are completely dependent on importing them, among other things from China. Therefore, it is good with this law that we now ensure that batteries will also be part of the circular economy. Now we will legislate on the entire life cycle of a battery, from design to last charging, and when we reuse the depleted batteries better, we will import fewer materials from China. It is good for the climate, it is good for the environment, and it is essential for Europe's independence. I do not think that China should be the gatekeeper of Europe's green transition, and now we take action and start by getting some better batteries."};"According to the speech, electric vehicles are mentioned as having batteries that make up their ""fuel tank"". This implies that electric cars and trucks rely on batteries for propulsion. Additionally, it is stated that these batteries will eventually be used for energy storage of sun and wind power.

In summary, the text mentions that:

* Electric cars and trucks have batteries that serve as their fuel tank.
* These batteries are crucial for future energy storage of renewable sources (sun and wind).
* The focus is on reusing depleted batteries to reduce dependence on importing materials from China."};0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;1;
"2023-06-13_15-20";"Sylvia Limmer";"ID";"
    Madam President! The extravagant consumption of resources, geostrategic dependencies or the unresolved disposal of so-called traction batteries of electric cars are just some of the problems with batteries. Therefore, I would actually be in favor of an even stricter battery regulation - but only to ensure fair competition between combustion engines and politically favored electric cars.
    
    Just when it comes to the CO2 footprint of the supposedly CO2-free technology, one is extremely hesitant with the green favorite toys. While a net zero CO2 strategy is being propagated everywhere, battery production limits are only to be introduced at the earliest in three years, taking into account technological progress - something that is not interesting for anyone else in all other sectors.
    
    At least with this regulation, the lie of emissions-free battery technology is off the table, as well as its lack of closed-loop capability. Batteries are indeed not: sustainable."};"According to the speech, the following points related to electric vehicles (EVs) are mentioned:

1. **Traction batteries**: The speaker mentions that there is an unresolved disposal problem with traction batteries of electric cars.
2. **CO2 footprint**: The speaker questions the CO2-free nature of EV technology, implying that it may not be as environmentally friendly as claimed.
3. **Battery production limits**: The speaker suggests introducing battery production limits in three years to account for technological progress, which is seen as a delay compared to other sectors.
4. **Closed-loop capability**: The speaker claims that batteries are not sustainable due to their lack of closed-loop capability (i.e., the inability to recycle or reuse them efficiently).
5. **Comparison with combustion engines**: The speaker suggests stricter battery regulation to ensure fair competition between EVs and combustion engines, implying that EVs may have an unfair advantage.

Overall, the speech expresses skepticism about the environmental benefits of electric vehicles and highlights concerns related to their production, disposal, and sustainability."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;1;
"2023-06-13_15-22";"Robert Hajšel";"S&D";" – Madam President, batteries are essential components of the green transition. We need them for electronic devices, electric vehicles and balancing of renewable energy sources. Without batteries and necessary storage capacities, renewable technology will still have to be backed by fossil fuels that ensure stability of grid if there is a lack of sun, wind or water.
EU is a leader in batteries, with more than EUR 127 billion in investment. If we want to maintain our leadership, we must protect our industry from moving abroad. To increase our strategic autonomy and meet our ambitious goals, we need to create conditions for batteries made by European workers with European components. To achieve this, critical raw material such as cobalt, natural graphite and lithium are essential. Demand for critical raw materials is projected to increase drastically, and Europe still heavily relies on imports. We need to decrease dependency on imports, diversify sources and secure domestic and sustainable supplies.
I think we need more ambitious targets in the Critical Raw Materials Act, and the 10% target for extraction is not enough. As the EPP rapporteur on the hydrogen bank, I would like to stress the role that hydrogen can play as the option for storage of renewable energy. Domestic production should always be a priority and I call for robust financial support for local producers."};"According to the speech, batteries are essential components of electric vehicles (EVs). The speaker mentions that EVs need batteries, along with electronic devices and balancing renewable energy sources. This is mentioned as one of the reasons why batteries are crucial for the green transition.

In summary, the text states that electric vehicles require batteries, highlighting their importance in the context of a green transition."};0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;
"2023-06-14_15-13";"Paul Tang";"S&D";"
    Chairman, who looks outside - the longest period without rain ever, the Atlantic Ocean at record warmth - and thinks: yes, I want more of this? Apparently there are some in this house who think so, because investments are desperately needed - 500 billion euros per year just for our climate and environmental goals.
    But attempts to mobilize that money, private and public, the taxonomy, the nature restoration law, a ban on petrol engines are being weakened or blocked by the right. So we remain stuck in an outdated model where pigs live on each other in gigastocks and farmers barely get around. Where the car industry wasted money on diesel investments and fraudulent software and now loses its market to electric cars from the US and China. Where Shell, the oil company, disappoints shareholders with extra dividends and cuts investments in sustainability. Is this an attractive investment climate? Profits at the expense of people and the environment? I have a different vision.
    We lead investments in good jobs and invest in our economy, but especially in our people and our planet. We prioritize the transition. So not the dead-end road of oil and gas drilling, but the fast lane to sustainability for all businesses: large, medium and small, industrial or agricultural.
    In a good European investment climate, all businesses that want and can make the transition have access to money. The Commission is happily working on this with recommendations today, this week, to finance the transition. Because sustainable investing, sustainable investing is not about being green, but about becoming green. We are on the right track. But instead of helping build this, my Christian democratic colleagues put their efforts into digging in the sand. My advice to them is therefore: stop feeding an inward-looking opposition policy and look outside. Do you want a healthy European economy, a Europe that also has nature, jobs and food for our children? Help us make Europe a place to invest in a sustainable future."};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned related to electric vehicles:

* The car industry has wasted money on diesel investments and fraudulent software, which has led to it losing its market to electric cars from the US and China.
* This implies that electric cars from the US and China have gained popularity and are now competing with traditional petrol-powered cars.

These two points suggest that the speaker is highlighting the growing trend of electric vehicles and how they are becoming a significant competitor in the market, which is affecting the traditional car industry."};0;1;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2023-06-14_15-18";"Enikő Győri";"NI";"
    Madam President! The epidemic, the war, and the economic crisis caused by sanctions, inflation, as well as America's conscious policy have resulted in less foreign investment coming to Europe in recent years for strategic sectors. It is no wonder, given that what we offer instead of offshore paradise conditions? Raining energy prices, raw material dependence, increasing administrative burdens and behavioral regulations. European companies are slowly running out of time to produce or provide if they want to meet every demand. We call for a green transition, but let's raise China, while the world is not preparing a solar panel or electric car battery without us.
    We waste valuable years until the signed free trade agreements are reached. This situation with Mercosur and the Mexican agreement, which would provide serious business opportunities for both parties. It is especially painful that the Commission only talks about Kovid-19 in words. There has been no progress since September on the package they promised to facilitate. The ""think small first"" or ""if we introduce a new rule, let's eliminate an old one"" principle only exists on paper. Let Brussels finally breathe life into businesses, otherwise this Commission will enter the history of the Union as the one that killed Europe's competitiveness!"};"According to the speech, it is mentioned that:

* China prepares solar panels and electric car batteries without European help.
* The speaker implies that Europe should be doing more to develop these technologies, but instead, they are lagging behind.

That's the only mention of electric vehicles in the text."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;
"2023-06-14_17-11";"Miguel Urbán Crespo";"The Left";"
    On behalf of The Left Group. - Madam President, the climate emergency exists now and its consequences are felt today, especially in the Global South, but not only. The year 2030 is too late because we are already late today.
    The acceleration of the implementation agenda of the Sustainable Development Goals proposed by this report is welcome, but climate change will not be solved, ladies and gentlemen, with beautiful words. We need decisive actions commensurate with the emergency we live in and actions consistent with the challenge we face. It is not enough to greenwash capitalism. It is not enough to add a sustainable label to models of development based on infinite growth.
    The supposed energy transition in the North is increasing predatory extractivism in the South. Because, for there to be electric cars in Brussels, Paris or Berlin, there need to be mines that destroy territory in Peru, Bolivia or Chile.
    Green capitalism is unviable. The climate crisis can only be addressed from an ecosocialist economic planning because our lives are worth much more than the profits of a few companies."};"According to the speech, the supposed ""energy transition"" in Northern countries (such as Brussels, Paris, or Berlin) is actually increasing ""predatory extractivism"" in Southern countries (such as Peru, Bolivia, or Chile). This means that in order for there to be electric cars in these Northern cities, it requires the destruction of territory and resources in these Southern countries."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;
"2023-06-15_4-38";"Marie Dauchy";"ID";" – Madam President, dear colleagues, the issue of the water crisis is a truly transversal problem because water is everywhere and serves all purposes. It is necessary for our food supply and hygiene, it conditions our agricultural and industrial production, it impacts the attractiveness and livability of our territories, and it is itself greatly affected by our lifestyles and climate change.
     We will not overcome a problem of such magnitude with incantations, that is to say, with solutions advocated by political ecology as it is currently developed. How can we trust policies that, claiming to address climate change, advocate for the implementation of fully electric mobility when we know that producing just one battery equals the annual water consumption of 500 people? How can we trust policies that, claiming to restore nature, want to destroy essential water retention areas necessary for regulating groundwater flows? Of course, there is not enough time here to address all the absurdities of pseudo-ecological policies implemented in Brussels or to develop all viable solutions.
     The water crisis will be overcome through a radical and logical change, by questioning the free trade model always promoted by European institutions, by orienting our environmental policies towards more localism, and by placing trust in science instead of ideology."};"According to the speech, it is mentioned that some policies claim to address climate change by advocating for fully electric mobility. However, the speaker questions the trustworthiness of these policies due to the fact that producing one battery equals the annual water consumption of 500 people. This suggests that the production of batteries for electric vehicles has a significant impact on water resources, which is a concern in the context of the water crisis."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2023-07-10_15-3";"Petar Vitanov";"NA";"
    Speaker. - Mr. President, mobility and transport are of vital importance to European citizens and crucial for the European economy. Along with their benefits, however, transport causes huge damage to the environment, accounting for over a third of greenhouse gas emissions in Europe. I am sure that everyone in this hall wants the transport sector to change so as to become less dependent on fossil fuels, contribute to the decarbonization of the continent, maintain its competitiveness without depriving the poor and vulnerable of affordable mobility.
    
    The active roll-out of renewable energy sources and low-carbon fuels must go hand in hand with the construction of a geographically dense infrastructure network for charging electric energy and refuelling with fuel, so as to facilitate the market entry of zero and low emission vehicles and encourage people to use them. Ultimately, this regulation aims for all modes of transport, whether maritime or airborne, to move easily along major European routes.
    
    I received my dossier after most of the work had been done and do not want to attach importance to it, but as the S&D Group's coordinator on transport, I would like to express my gratitude on my own behalf and on behalf of all my colleagues to Ismail Ertug, the person with a major contribution to these numerous small and not so small victories that the European Parliament has managed to achieve during the negotiations. And if I may, I would like to summarize some of them.
    
    Firstly, the regulation already covers the key missing element in the Commission's proposal, namely rail transport, which we have long been accepting as the transport of the future. The development of alternative fuels is important for the railway sector, where for various reasons direct electrification is not always possible. We already have available technologies to replace diesel trains with electric ones, battery-powered or hydrogen-powered ones. And it is the development of these technologies that requires the construction of a suitable infrastructure for charging in the territories of the Member States.
    
    Secondly, there are increased targets for the infrastructure for charging light commercial vehicles, which must provide 30% more electricity per registered electric car from 1 kW to 1.3 kW and from 0.66 to 0.8 at plug-in hybrids. Taking into account the distance factor, by 2025 we should be able to ensure free cross-border travel with enough charging stations along the way. The regulation also provides for the location of charging stations. For heavy goods vehicles, there is also a provision for more stations with increased energy capacity.
    
    Thirdly, and not in terms of importance, are texts aimed at consumers. Operators of fast charging centers over 50 kW will have to provide payment card options. Increasing transparency is also being introduced regarding the way of charging. For example, at fast charging stations, the price should be based entirely on the cost per kilowatt-hour, while for slow ones there are different options - per kilowatt-hour, per minute, per session or other components. The creation of a European access point will increase the awareness of European citizens and help them travel effectively, providing comprehensive information on alternative fuels infrastructure. The regulation also provides for the location of hydrogen charging stations with the possibility of expansion after re-assessment. Simultaneously, the minimum infrastructure for liquefied natural gas is limited at land and sea transport. The texts on providing electrical power supply at airports are preserved, mandatory requirements are in place for the location of hydrogen stations and so on, and so on.  As a whole, the agreement is balanced and contains significantly more progressive positions compared to the Commission's initial proposal. I believe that the progressive approach should remain at the basis of the changes we are outlining today for a cleaner and more stable future for Europe and its citizens."};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned regarding electric vehicles:

1. The regulation aims to facilitate the market entry of zero and low-emission vehicles, including electric energy.
2. A geographically dense infrastructure network for charging electric energy is necessary to encourage people to use electric vehicles.
3. The development of alternative fuels is important for the railway sector, where direct electrification is not always possible. Electric trains can be replaced with battery-powered or hydrogen-powered ones, and suitable infrastructure for charging needs to be constructed in Member States' territories.
4. Increased targets are set for the infrastructure for charging light commercial vehicles, which must provide 30% more electricity per registered electric car from 1 kW to 1.3 kW and from 0.66 to 0.8 at plug-in hybrids.
5. By 2025, free cross-border travel with enough charging stations along the way should be ensured for electric cars.
6. Operators of fast-charging centers over 50 kW will have to provide payment card options.

These points highlight the importance of developing infrastructure for electric vehicles and promoting their adoption in Europe."};0;0;0;0;1;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2023-07-10_15-9";"Adina-Ioana Vălean";"NA";" Member of the Commission. – Madam President, honourable Members of the Parliament, ladies and gentlemen, today’s debate and tomorrow’s vote shows that we are delivering on our Green Deal ambition.
Let me start with the two proposals on industrial emissions. I want to thank the rapporteur Mr Kanev, the ENVI Chair Mr Canfin and all the shadow rapporteurs for the work on this file. The Commission supports the ENVI report for many core elements of our proposal, notably ensuring more consistent emissions limits across the EU, promoting resource efficiency, facilitating public access to information, and making the legislation more forward—looking with better links to innovation.
The European Parliament has been discussing the widening of the scope to cover more livestock farming activities. The Commission would like to stress that this widened scope would only concern the largest livestock farms. This would help relieve the pressure on the smallest farms in meeting the overall climate adjustment efforts required in the agricultural sector.
Turning to the two transport files, I welcome the compromise text on the new Alternative Fuels Infrastructure Regulation and the FuelEU Maritime Regulation. On both files we have an ambitious and a balanced result. I would like to thank the rapporteur Mr Warborn and the former rapporteur Mr Ertug, as well as the shadow rapporteurs for their excellent work and the good cooperation with the Czech and Swedish presidencies and as well with the Commission.
The AFI Regulation will ensure a market—driven rollout of sufficient and user—friendly alternative fuels infrastructure everywhere in the EU. We also have for the first time mandatory deployment targets for key recharging and refuelling infrastructure, and these include electric recharging infrastructure for light and heavy—duty vehicles on the road, hydrogen refuelling infrastructure for road vehicles, onshore power supply in TEN—T ports in alignment with FuelEU Maritime, and electricity supply to stationary aircraft in all TEN—T airports. As you know, we would have appreciated higher targets for heavy—duty vehicle recharging and hydrogen refuelling infrastructure. But the end result is very good considering the starting position of the Member States.
The FuelEU Maritime Regulation will play a crucial role in decarbonising the maritime sector. Importantly, FuelEU Maritime remains an incentive and goal—based regulation. It keeps the door open to new technologies and allows technology suppliers to develop solutions, meeting the needs of different shipping segments. It also recognises the role e—fuels will play in the future and provides incentives to support their cost—competitiveness and uptake.
FuelEU Maritime also provides the inspiration for regulating shipping emissions globally. Following the milestone decision at the 80th meeting of the Marine Environment Protection Committee which concluded just last week, a global fuel standard modelled on our European approach should be adopted by 2025 as one of mid—term measures to decarbonise shipping by mid—century.
The Commission also welcomes the agreement reached on the proposal for the recast of the Energy Efficiency Directive. We convey our warmest thanks to the rapporteur Mr Fuglsang and the shadow rapporteurs for their efforts in reaching this result. This is a major piece of the EU’s energy policy. By boosting energy efficiency, the EED recast provides the EU with a solid framework to reach our climate goals and to increase our energy independence. We welcome the agreement on an ambitious energy efficiency target of 11.7% covered by a strong governance mechanism and an annual energy savings obligation target of 1.49%, as well as the target for energy reduction in the public sector of 1.9%.
In conclusion, I would like to thank you again for the constructive work on these five proposals, all very relevant to implement the European Green Deal."};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned regarding electric vehicles:

1. The Alternative Fuels Infrastructure Regulation (AFI Regulation) will ensure a market-driven rollout of sufficient and user-friendly alternative fuels infrastructure everywhere in the EU.
2. The AFI Regulation includes mandatory deployment targets for key recharging and refuelling infrastructure, which include:
	* Electric recharging infrastructure for light and heavy-duty vehicles on the road
3. The Commission would have appreciated higher targets for heavy-duty vehicle recharging and hydrogen refuelling infrastructure, but considers the end result to be very good considering the starting position of the Member States.

These points indicate that the European Union is promoting the development of electric vehicle charging infrastructure as part of its efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and transition to a more sustainable energy system."};0;0;0;0;1;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2023-07-10_15-10";"Alexandr Vondra";"NA";"
    Member of the Committee on Environment, Public Health and Food Safety. - Madam President, I was the shadow rapporteur for the AFIR position, that is to say, for alternative infrastructure, for alternative charging, and I will say the following: you all - and I also count myself among you - who think it is not wise to ban internal combustion engines, but rather to leave it with some market incentives, naturally and logically tend towards the idea that it would be much better to leave it to the market environment and what the actual demand is, rather than building something socialistically according to various five-year plans, banning something, ordering something.
    
    Reality, however, is that in this environment and in this honorable institution, the socialist view has prevailed, which means banning and ordering. And since we want to ban those internal combustion engines - and I repeat, I disagree with that - we must obviously offer them something so they can drive and charge.
    
    In other words, this legislation AFIR has a great significance. That's why I also participated in its negotiations. Here, however, I have to point out that it is far from being simply because our faction would prefer a much broader technological neutrality. We clearly prefer dominant electric mobility, which means we are essentially handing over the European industry so that China simply overwhelms us here. I think this is a huge mistake. But there is no dispute about the fact that if people drive electric cars, they must have a place to charge, and if we ban and order them, we must offer them an alternative as well."};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned related to electric vehicles:

1. The speaker disagrees with banning internal combustion engines and instead suggests leaving it up to market demand.
2. However, since the legislation AFIR aims to ban internal combustion engines, alternative charging infrastructure must be offered for electric cars.
3. The speaker's faction prefers dominant electric mobility, which means they are essentially allowing China to overwhelm the European industry in this area.
4. It is acknowledged that if people drive electric cars, they need a place to charge.

In summary, the speech mentions the need for alternative charging infrastructure for electric vehicles as part of the AFIR legislation, and expresses concerns about the dominance of electric mobility being handed over to China."};0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;
"2023-07-10_15-12";"Michael Bloss";"NA";"
    Author of the opinion of the consulting committee for Industry, Research and Energy. - Madam President, dear ladies and gentlemen! Out of the ten best-selling E-car models in 2022, only one is from the European Union. The rest come from the USA and China. Unfortunately, European manufacturers have already missed the boat here, and some in this house still cling to e-fuels and internal combustion engines, making the modernization of the economy more difficult.
    It is clear that those who want good jobs and industry need to invest in modernization now. That means: Of course, we need many charging stations for electric cars, for electric trucks. But that's not all. Mobility is changing. We also need electric buses, more traffic on rails and cycle paths, and above all: broad support for the Green Deal and the ecological modernization of the economy. With your fight against the Green Deal, you are fighting against modernization and promoting deindustrialization. Dear colleagues, stand up for the Green Deal, create security for jobs, for industry, for investments, so that Europe does not miss out on the race for market leadership!"};"According to the speech, here are the points related to electric vehicles:

1. Out of the top 10 best-selling E-car models in 2022, only one is from the European Union, while the rest come from the USA and China.
2. The speaker emphasizes the need for many charging stations for electric cars and electric trucks.

That's a summary of what is said about electric vehicles in the text!"};0;1;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;
"2023-07-10_15-17";"Jens Gieseke";"EPP";"
    On behalf of the PPE Group. – Madam President, Commissioner Vălean, dear colleagues! This is an important signal today! Insufficient charging infrastructure is still a major problem. Without public acceptance among citizens, there will be no reduction in emissions. We need a Europe-wide success story and not just a few charging columns in some countries. The AFIR was a great success, also for the EPP. Where others wanted to exclude technology openness, we have committed to it, agreed on legally binding targets, and provided planning security. This must now be implemented by the Member States.
    The AFIR was just the starting shot. More commitment is necessary, especially due to the combustion engine ban from 2035, while we are still waiting for Vice-President Timmermans' proposal for the recognition of climate-neutral fuels. Now, either he cannot or will not deliver, in any case: So far, the gentleman Vice-President has not delivered anything.
    The ban proponents remain faithful to their cause. Although the truck expansion targets in the AFIR were weakened - in the Council there was simply no majority for more ambition - Greens now want to extend the combustion engine ban to trucks and buses. I find that this is only becoming increasingly worldly and detached from reality. We need all solutions: electro, hydrogen, LNG, sustainable fuels. We should not exclude anything. At the end of the technical dossier AFIR, we achieved a good compromise. I would like to thank all those involved, and allow me a personal remark: The colleague Ertug has left the building. Dear Ismail, best wishes to you and your family, and I hope to see you outside the Parliament again."};"The speech mentions electric vehicles (EVs) indirectly by referencing ""electro"" as one of the solutions for reducing emissions. The speaker emphasizes that all solutions should be considered, including electro, hydrogen, LNG, and sustainable fuels, implying that EVs are part of the broader range of options being discussed.

There is no specific mention of electric vehicles' charging infrastructure or public acceptance, which was mentioned in the first sentence of the speech as a major problem. However, the speaker does not elaborate on electric vehicles further, focusing instead on the need for a Europe-wide success story and the importance of considering multiple solutions to reduce emissions."};0;0;0;0;1;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;
"2023-07-10_15-20";"Jutta Paulus";"Greens/EFA";"
    On behalf of the Verts/ALE faction. - Madam President, Madam Commissioner, dear colleagues! I could speak here for half an hour, because I have co-negotiated four of the laws we are discussing now.
    Let me start with the Energy Efficiency Directive, which is the key instrument to finally put an end to energy waste, as the fruits are so low that one has to stoop down to pick them. We have achieved a lot, but if you look at the developments in renewables, in electromobility, and in building heating, you must conclude that the target we ultimately agreed on is pretty much exactly half of what could potentially be possible. But I am an optimist, we can always do better than the directive.
    As for sustainable ship fuels, my colleague Rasmus Andresen has already said most of it. Here too: The planned investments of the largest European shipping company alone are enough to fulfill the biofuel quota. With that, I believe, much is said about the ambition of this law.
    The Industrial Emissions Directive - my colleague has already informed us - is on the verge of collapse, and here too - one of the most effective instruments for reducing environmental pollution and protecting citizens' health - it is being politicized at the expense of people and nature.
    So where are we with the Green Deal? We have made great progress on climate. But the second central pillar, the preservation of our basic living conditions, is now in danger of being undermined. If we do not curb environmental pollution, our ecosystems will continue to deteriorate. If we do not ensure that fewer emissions, especially also from large livestock farms, reach the environment, we will not achieve our climate goals either. The regulation on the restoration of nature, which we will vote on on Wednesday, falls into the same category. Everything that is not originally climate or energy will be attacked, politicized, made the subject of populist attacks and sand will be thrown in people's eyes. Because if we continue as before, it is the safe way to ensure that we cannot achieve our climate goals, our biodiversity targets, nor the zero-pollution target, and thus the Green Deal is de facto castrated.
    Dear colleagues, do not let this happen! Support the regulation on the restoration of nature and also the Industrial Emissions Directive, because it's about more than just populist debates and election campaigns!"};"In the speech, the speaker mentions ""electromobility"" as one of the developments that has been achieved under the Energy Efficiency Directive. This is mentioned in the following sentence:

""If you look at the developments in renewables, in electromobility, and in building heating, you must conclude that the target we ultimately agreed on is pretty much exactly half of what could potentially be possible.""

This is a brief mention of electric vehicles as part of the broader topic of energy efficiency and renewable energy. The speaker does not provide any further details or information about electric vehicles beyond this single sentence."};0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2023-07-10_15-22";"Marie Dauchy";"ID";"
    In the name of the ID group. - Madam President, the text in question deals with the deployment of an infrastructure for alternative fuels, but it could truly be titled ""deployment of an infrastructure to make car owners pay more and more.""
    For we must collectively stop lying to ourselves and, above all, to the people. What the European Commission, with the approval of the ecological left, has been boasting about for several years now is a nameless farce. The electric mobility that you impose without consent will finish off one of the last dominant European industries on an international scale, exacerbating the climate crisis and creating conditions for a social massacre for the peoples. The forced deployment of electric charging points planned in this context is nothing more than a way to accelerate their implementation, disregarding the principle of technological neutrality which would have each state free to choose the technologies they use to decarbonize transport.
    The European Union is gradually becoming the European Soviet Union where unelected and disconnected technocrats impose absurd decisions against the interest of the peoples. But do not forget that in democracy, it is the people who decide. And in a few months, you may learn this lesson at your own expense."};"According to the speech, the speaker criticizes the European Commission's plan to deploy an infrastructure for alternative fuels, specifically mentioning electric mobility. The speaker claims that this plan will:

1. Finish off one of the last dominant European industries on an international scale.
2. Exacerbate the climate crisis.
3. Create conditions for a social massacre for the people.

The speaker also mentions that the forced deployment of electric charging points is a way to accelerate their implementation, disregarding the principle of technological neutrality, which would allow each state to choose its own technology to decarbonize transport.

In summary, the speaker views the promotion of electric vehicles as a negative development that will harm European industries and exacerbate climate change, while also imposing unwanted decisions on people."};0;1;0;1;1;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2023-07-10_15-26";"Anna Deparnay-Grunenberg";"Greens/EFA";"
    – Madam President, dear colleagues! When we talk about the end of combustion engines, most people immediately think of cars. In fact, in recent months another important step towards decarbonizing transport has been achieved. With AFIR, the regulation on infrastructure for alternative fuels, we are finally pushing forward the electrification of freight transport. From now on, there will be a charging station for trucks every 60 kilometers. This creates the conditions for the logistics industry to switch quickly to battery-powered or alternative fuels for trucks. According to forecasts, more than half of the trucks licensed in Germany could be climate-neutral by 2030.
    But that's not enough. Rail transport is often forgotten when it comes to freight traffic and decarbonizing transport. We Greens have ensured that the entire rail sector will also become climate-friendly. Because so far only 54% of the tracks in the EU are electrified, and especially in rail freight, there are still far too many diesel trains on the rails.
    It is a real breakthrough, ladies and gentlemen, that the member states must take measures to expand alternative drive systems for railways by 2026. Because we need combustion engines for steam locomotives in a climate-neutral world one day."};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned related to electric vehicles:

1. The regulation on infrastructure for alternative fuels (AFIR) aims to push forward the electrification of freight transport.
2. With AFIR, there will be a charging station for trucks every 60 kilometers, creating conditions for the logistics industry to switch quickly to battery-powered or alternative fuels for trucks.
3. It is forecasted that more than half of the trucks licensed in Germany could be climate-neutral by 2030.

These points highlight the focus on electric vehicles (battery-powered) as an alternative fuel option for freight transport, particularly for trucks."};0;0;1;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2023-07-10_15-40";"Thomas Rudner";"S&D";"
    Madam President, dear colleagues! With the AFIR report, we have achieved a great success in terms of climate protection as the European Parliament. The regulations on charging infrastructure for passenger cars have been significantly improved to enable faster construction of charging columns. We have implemented a gradual approach to charging infrastructure for heavy goods vehicles with stricter targets and an increase in loading capacity over time. Hydrogen filling stations should be built quickly.
    The Commission will soon check whether these objectives can be further tightened. Contactless payment should become mandatory at all fast-charging columns and hydrogen filling stations - a great success for European consumer protection. In addition, the price must be uniformly defined in euros per kilowatt at these columns, thus ensuring uniform transparency for everyone.
    Another major step is the creation of EU Access Points for uniform data collection. Drivers will be able to see much more easily throughout Europe when, where and at what exact price they can charge or refuel in the future.
    Overall, the agreement is balanced and contains numerous gains for the European Parliament. The Commission's proposal could be improved in several aspects. Dear colleagues, I ask you to support this dossier in the vote."};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned related to electric vehicles:

1. Regulations on charging infrastructure for passenger cars have been improved to enable faster construction of charging columns.
2. Contactless payment will become mandatory at all fast-charging columns and hydrogen filling stations, which is a success for European consumer protection.
3. The price must be uniformly defined in euros per kilowatt at these columns, ensuring uniform transparency for everyone.
4. EU Access Points will be created for uniform data collection, allowing drivers to easily see throughout Europe where they can charge or refuel and at what exact price.

These points focus on the development of charging infrastructure, payment methods, and data collection for electric vehicles in the European Union."};0;0;0;0;1;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2023-07-10_15-59";"Petar Vitanov";"NA";"
    Speaker. - Madam President, I believe that I have been favored, as according to the procedure by which I had the honor of speaking, there were almost no comments. This is a certification for excellent work done and the symbiosis between different rapporteurs in the shadow and the main rapporteur.
    
    However, two things struck me. One of the few criticisms left was about leaving things on the market. When will we leave them on the market? When will we leave them to profits when talking about fossil fuels? Precisely those that, however, cannot feel the approaching catastrophe. Why? Because they can afford to live high up, where the air is clean, they can afford to eat quality food.
    
    Only this climate catastrophe hits the poor disproportionately and unfairly, because they cannot live where they want, nor eat what they want, nor be treated when it comes to European health, the citizens' health to be treated as they wish. That is why I believe that when we talk about binding requirements, this is extremely important, because only they guarantee the infrastructure. And when we have infrastructure, we have clean transport, the transport of the future, because if we do not have it, we may fall back into isolation, Europe at two speeds and despite the geographical location of one or another country, the lack of adjacent infrastructure will turn it into an economic desert.
    
    And maybe something else about infrastructure. Here I can also reassure the market fundamentalists. In fact, the requirement for the construction of infrastructure will bring back the market model, and the market model will then lead to there, electric cars will no longer be just a toy and a luxury for the rich, but they can become accessible to all."};"According to the speech, it is mentioned that electric cars will no longer be just a toy and a luxury for the rich if the market model is led by the requirement for the construction of infrastructure. This implies that with the development of infrastructure, electric vehicles will become more accessible to all people, not just those who can afford them."};0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;
"2023-07-10_15-65";"Andor Deli";"NI";"
    In writing. - The adoption of the regulation on alternative fuel infrastructure is a very important prerequisite for accelerating the construction of electric and hydrogen charging stations, which is essential for the transition to alternative propulsion vehicles. However, technological neutrality also requires the support of other carbon-neutral fuels, such as e- or biofuels, since they can play a crucial role in this transitional period. This will create the opportunity to gradually phase out internal combustion engines based on oil-based fuels and thus preserve the European automotive industry's position on the world market and tens of thousands of jobs.
    
    Finally, we must not forget the existing vehicle fleets or the fact that many LCVs and citizens will not be able to switch to zero-emission vehicles in the future, but they would still like to contribute to the green transition. Therefore, following the principle of ""leaving no one behind,"" the intensified support for the renewal of existing fleets is essential. If we replace a Euro 4 or 5 truck with a Euro 6, we can achieve significant CO2 reductions."};"According to the speech, electric vehicles are mentioned as one of the alternative propulsion vehicles that require infrastructure support for their widespread adoption. The text states:

""...the construction of electric and hydrogen charging stations...""

This indicates that electric vehicles will need a network of charging stations to be viable, which is essential for the transition to alternative propulsion vehicles.

Additionally, it is mentioned that not all vehicle fleets can switch to zero-emission vehicles (which includes electric vehicles), but they can still contribute to the green transition by being replaced with more environmentally friendly options. The text states:

""If we replace a Euro 4 or 5 truck with a Euro 6, we can achieve significant CO2 reductions.""

This implies that even if not all vehicles can be replaced with electric vehicles, upgrading existing fleets to more efficient and environmentally friendly options is still beneficial for reducing emissions."};0;1;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2023-07-10_15-67";"Nora Mebarek";"S&D";"
    In writing. - As the planet beats daily temperature records and the EU is the region of the world that warms up most quickly, the implementation of the Green Pact is more than ever a vital necessity. That's why I urge my colleagues to massively adopt the text on the deployment of alternative fuels, as it will make an essential contribution to respecting our commitments in favor of the climate. We know that transport is responsible for about one quarter of CO2 emissions in Europe. However, we are lagging behind in terms of electrification of our road network, and this while 2035 and the end of internal combustion engines approach. This text is therefore just as important for our fellow citizens, as it must convince them that driving across Europe in an electric car will soon be as simple and practical as with a thermal car. Adopting this text means finally preserving the health of our fellow citizens, and particularly those who live in port areas, where the emissions from ships contaminate the air of entire cities. The requirements for electrical supply to moored vessels will allow reducing the exposure of millions of Europeans to pollution and thus avoid many cancers."};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned related to electric vehicles:

1. The speaker urges colleagues to adopt a text on deploying alternative fuels, which will contribute to respecting climate commitments.
2. It is stated that transport is responsible for about one quarter of CO2 emissions in Europe, and that there is a need to electrify the road network.
3. The speaker mentions that driving across Europe in an electric car will soon be as simple and practical as with a thermal car.
4. The adoption of this text means preserving the health of fellow citizens, particularly those living in port areas where emissions from ships contaminate the air.

In summary, the speech highlights the importance of adopting alternative fuels, specifically electric vehicles, to reduce CO2 emissions and improve air quality, making it easier for people to drive across Europe."};0;0;1;0;1;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2023-07-11_13-2";"Jutta Urpilainen";"NA";" Member of the Commission. – Madam President, honourable Members, I am taking this floor on behalf of Commissioner Vălean, who is in the press room at the moment. So freight transport is the backbone of our single market and our trade with the rest of the world. Rate volumes are projected to rise by 50 % by 2050. This stands as testimony to the health and competitiveness of our economy. At the same time, rate also accounts for 30 % of transport Co2 emissions. Reducing these is vital to delivering on our European Green Deal objectives. But we must do this while allowing our single market to grow. In response to these challenges and opportunities, today, a couple hours ago, the College adopted the Greening Freight Package, which aims to help the sector to decarbonise, further harmonise our rules in the single market and better structure allocation of rail-freight capacity across borders. Concretely, the Greening Freight Package comprises a regulation creating a harmonised framework for Co2 emissions (CountEmissions EU), the revision of the Weights and Dimensions Directive, a regulation on improving the use of railway infrastructure, the revision of the Combined Transport Directive, which is planned for adoption later this month. 
To provide an overview of the package, we have a communication explaining the rationale behind it and how the proposals fit in with the bigger picture. It also highlights the people behind freight-transport services setting the scene for addressing worker shortages, improving their working environment and tackling an ageing workforce. 
So let me now turn to the three legislative initiatives on the table today. CountEmissions EU: This proposal establishes a single methodology to calculate transport service emissions. It will be based on a global ISO standard recently adopted. Already today we see transport operators informing their customers of the impact of the Co2 emissions of their trips. However, we don’t know how this impact has been calculated, and this is what we tackle with this proposal, ensuring businesses and consumers get reliable and comparable data when being informed about their carbon footprint for passenger services, but also for freight. There is notably no obligation on economic operators to provide their carbon footprint. And we have paid particular attention not to burden the sector, in particular SMEs. 
The second proposal and initiative is the Weights and Dimensions Directive. The shift to clean trucks in particular, zero-emission vehicles will take time. Naturally, we need additional incentives to make them more attractive and increase their uptake. Our proposal intends to do this by allowing an additional weight of four tonnes for zero-emission vehicles to accommodate the weight of batteries without losing loading capacity. This is critical for a sector where most hauliers are SMEs and make a very careful cost-benefit analysis of every euro spent on fleet renewable. We remain technologically neutral. Should the market opt for hydrogen based solutions, we propose technical adjustments to host tanks behind the cabin without losing load capacity. Moreover, we are finally putting an end to today’s patchwork of national rules and bilateral agreements for high capacity vehicles which were at odds with the single market. We are not pushing anyone to embrace longer and/or heavier trucks where this is not accepted today. We are simply ending the situation in which more efficient trucks currently allowed in two or more neighbouring Member States cannot cross the borders between these. Standard 44 tonne trucks currently allowed in national traffic in 12 Member States will also be able to travel cross borders between allowing Member States, for example, a truck will be able to travel from the Netherlands to France, while until now their journey needed to end in Belgium. 
Finally, we make life easier for road operators and important industries such as renewables and tech companies, which today face a platform of national requirements and procedures when transporting, for example, a piece of a wind turbine across borders. 
Our third initiative is rail capacity regulation. Rail is one of the cleanest ways to transport freight, but current rules on capacity allocation are ineffective and particularly unfavourable to cross-border and freight services. And unfortunately, this makes rail unattractive for many logistics companies. Better management of capacity will help address this. So more concretely, our proposal will incentivise infrastructure managers to act in a more flexible way for both long-term strategic planning and short-term capacity allocation. With optimised use of the network, we will be bringing additional capacity and creating space for additional services. Railway undertakings will be able to request capacity at any time based on market needs instead of having the file requests within rigid timelines. We are also discouraging some practices by which companies reserve capacity just in case and do not use it. Equally, infrastructure managers will have to plan works on the network well in advance and take measures to reduce their impact on operations. 
Let me conclude, honourable Members. The European freight sector is at a turning point. With increasing demand, it must become less polluting and more resilient while continuing to thrive in tomorrow’s globalised economy. "};"The text does not explicitly mention electric vehicles, but it does mention ""zero-emission vehicles"" which are likely referring to electric or hydrogen-powered vehicles.

In the context of the Weights and Dimensions Directive, the proposal aims to incentivize the adoption of zero-emission vehicles by allowing an additional weight of four tonnes for these vehicles to accommodate the weight of batteries without losing loading capacity. This is intended to make them more attractive and increase their uptake in the freight transport sector.

Additionally, the text mentions that if the market opts for hydrogen-based solutions, technical adjustments will be proposed to host tanks behind the cabin without losing load capacity.

Overall, while electric vehicles are not explicitly mentioned, the proposal aims to support the development of zero-emission vehicles, which could include electric or hydrogen-powered options."};0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2023-07-11_13-12";"Ciarán Cuffe";"Greens/EFA";" – Madam President, Commissioner, the transport proposals you have released today are very welcome. We need more transparency on emissions so that people and business can make sustainable transport choices. We need to improve our rail services and we need to prepare heavy-duty vehicles for the green transition.
However, I am concerned about your final proposal on the weights and dimensions of vehicles. I hear that this proposal could bring more mega trucks or gigaliners onto EU roads by regulating bilateral deals between EU countries on cross-border travel by these vehicles.
Commissioner, I do not want to remind you, just like the SUVs, giant vehicles like these are dangerous for other road users. They are damaging to our roads, our bridges and our tunnels. They are more polluting and cancel out any gains made through emission reductions and they undermine the crucial shift to rail. So I hope you do not want to allow more of these dangerous and polluting vehicles on our roads and that you can provide clarity on this proposal."};"There is no mention of electric vehicles in the provided speech. The speaker only talks about heavy-duty vehicles, SUVs, rail services, and emissions, but does not mention electric vehicles at all. Therefore, there is nothing to summarize regarding electric vehicles from this text."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2023-07-12_13-8";"Jorge Buxadé Villalba";"ECR";"
    On behalf of the ECR Group. - Mr. President, Mr. Commissioner, one year before the European elections, this Commission cannot come here to tell us that it has a magical plan to protect middle and working classes which have been devastated since Ursula von der Leyen announced the Green Pact. No European citizen, when they went to vote, knew about this Pact.
    It's a pact between you, the great coalition between populists, socialists, and greens. They did it behind the people's back and sell it with drum and trumpet, spending taxpayers' money. Money that they squander every day with the climate excuse: CO2 taxes, plastic taxes, sugar-sweetened beverage taxes, sun taxes, wind taxes, water taxes, tolls, and climate penalties. They spend a legislature saying that walls don't protect, encouraging mass and uncontrolled immigration. But they have built a big wall inside the cities to protect themselves. A wall of taxes, penalties, and prohibitions that prevent Europeans from entering the cities when they cannot afford an electric car.
    Today's debate is truly a mockery. They cannot come to talk about protecting middle classes in the same week that the so-called Nature Restoration Act is approved, which deals a fatal blow to European agricultural holdings, the same week that the Industrial Emissions Directive is approved, which will put an end to dozens of livestock farms, the same week they have refused a debate on violence and rebellion in France against middle and working-class French people.
    I give them a plan, here it is. Immediately suspend the Green Pact. Stop printing money for the climate party. Reverse the ban on internal combustion engines and the Nature Restoration Act. Abandon the demolition of dams. Bet on nuclear power. Lower taxes, all of them, especially those affecting income and consumption by families. Stop mass and uncontrolled immigration used by the rich to reduce wages and destroy security in our neighborhoods. And put an end to that madness of the 2030 Agenda, the darkest utopia ever known by man.
    I no longer ask them to listen to us. I tell them to let us pass. On July 23rd, the Spaniards, like before the Italians, Swedes, Poles, Czechs, Hungarians, Finns, and Dutch, God willing, will make it very clear at the polls. We have an alternative to their demolition agenda and it is to restore everything they have destroyed."};"According to the speech, the following point is made related to electric vehicles:

""...when they cannot afford an electric car.""

This sentence implies that the speaker believes that the ""wall of taxes, penalties, and prohibitions"" mentioned earlier prevents Europeans from entering cities because they cannot afford to buy an electric car."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;
"2023-07-12_19-17";"Hildegard Bentele";"EPP";"
    Mr. President, dear Commissioner, dear colleagues! As an environmental politician, an industrial politician, and above all as a Christian Democrat, three important points come to mind for me regarding the risks of the EU's path towards climate neutrality. We endanger this path if it does not become a business case for European industry and economy. If the realignment associated with high investments is not foreseeably also financially profitable, and our European companies cannot stand up to international competition, then we will face the massive problem of deindustrialization, and no one will follow our high standards anymore.
    
    Money is not everything, however, there is also the danger that we will squeeze companies with unattainable, unrealistic, and unnecessary climate protection requirements in terms of environmental protection - with all consequences for locations and jobs.
    
    The second risk is that we overburden citizens with too fast and too radical climate measures. Anyone who cannot afford an electric car, insulation of their home, or a heating system exchange, more expensive food - if we destroy existences in rural areas, then even open-minded Europeans will protest and unfortunately strengthen the right side here in Parliament. You, Mr. Timmermans, have an example in the Netherlands with the BBB in front of your own eyes. A climate protection that is only driven by elites and technocrats is doomed to fail. Please listen to this as representatives of the people. We have our ear on the ground with the people on site.
    
    And lastly: Climate protection must be done internationally. The greatest success we could achieve would be to expand the market-economic and successful instrument of emissions trading globally. We should start where it is most favorable and efficient to save CO2. This goal should be the focus of the European Commission, not the helpless attempt at a European climate tariff."};"According to the speech, one of the risks associated with the EU's path towards climate neutrality is that citizens may be overburdened by too fast and radical climate measures. The speaker mentions that not everyone can afford an electric car as part of these measures.

In summary, the text does not provide any additional information about electric vehicles beyond mentioning them as one example of a potentially expensive measure that some people may struggle to adopt."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;
"2023-07-12_19-52";"Frans Timmermans";"NA";" Executive Vice-President of the Commission. – Madam President, honourable Members, let me share with you a couple of reflections after having listened to you and after a very, very eventful day. 
First of all, the system works. What I mean by that is that with all the falsehoods, the manipulative way of presenting issues, etc. that were done, and we tried to debunk, it mobilised society in an incredible way. Look at all the debunking done by NGOs. Look at the 6 000 scientists mobilised to plead for the Nature Restoration Law. Look at the more than 1 000 leaders of industries coming out and saying, we need this law. Look at the wind industry saying ‘those people who were saying that you cannot build wind farms with the Nature Restoration Law are wrong – on the contrary, with the Nature Restoration Law it will become easier to combine wind farms and nature restoration, etc., etc., etc. 
So my first point is, if we are active and if we involve civil society in all of this, when nonsense is put on the table we are not the only ones who can debunk it. It will be done by people who understand this in society, and  today my main message is thank you to the young people who went into the streets, thank you to the NGOs who mobilised to tell the truth, thank you to the 6 000 scientists who took the trouble to write a letter, thank you to the more than 1 000 entrepreneurs who spoke out in favour of the Nature Restoration Law. I think they helped us get a majority in this Parliament because it led to people thinking about this and perhaps reconsidering their vote. 
My second comment is that personal attacks don’t work, they just don’t work. If you don’t take the bait, if you don’t react, if you don’t sling mud back, it doesn’t work. I was so happy to have heard this afternoon Manfred Weber saying in the press conference ‘I so deplore the personal attacks’. Good. Good, so we don’t have to get into a pot and kettle situation. Let’s not do it. It doesn’t work. It doesn’t work. You always get back to the facts if you just don’t take the bait. This is my experience and I wanted to share it with you. So if they start attacking you personally, don’t take the bait. It will go away. 
My third point is that when you don’t take the bait, when you have the outside world helping you, you will always come back to the content of the proposal. I think that after today’s vote we’re back at the content of the proposals, and I implore our colleagues from the EPP to take the content and tell us what they want to change. The Commission is open to negotiate to find consensus in Parliament, because it is not winner takes all in this Parliament, it is also respect for the minorities that have lost the vote and their ideas could help make the law the legislation better. So my offer to the EPP is let’s continue, let’s negotiate. 
I do believe that a democracy depends on respect for facts. I want to underline that so much. Listen to the scientists. I’ve heard people here say, and this is very funny from people who used to be deniers – and it is very difficult to be a climate denier today, I think – that they are now changing tack. Climate policy is an ideology. Well, I think following science is not an ideology, denying science is an ideology. Or they say it is a totalitarian approach. You know, I was listening to it just now and I was thinking of Orwell and 1984, where he writes: ‘War is peace, freedom is slavery and ignorance is strength’ – and especially the last phrase stuck in my mind. So colleagues, don’t fall into that trap, and especially if the temptation is to gang up on the right side of the political spectrum, do not fall for the temptation if that means it forces you to deny the facts. 
Dutch politics were mentioned. The Christian Democrats in the Netherlands at some point tried to set up a cooperation with the extreme right. They’re still recovering from it. They won’t do it again. They learned that and they’re still trying to recover from it. You know, it is dangerous if you think you can invite the fox into the chicken coop and expect that the fox will turn into a vegetarian. I would not take that risk! 
To end: employment. I want to take that point seriously. This is about creating future sustainable jobs for Europeans. There are more jobs in the energy transition in the new economy than in the old economy. Don’t sell the people the fallacy that by tying them to the past you offer them a future. 
What would we have done at a time when the combustion engine was invented and we said ‘oh no, we can’t have that. We need the horse and carriage because otherwise too many grooms will lose their jobs’? Would that have slowed down the introduction of combustion engines? No! 
I was in China recently. One of every second car sold in China now is electric, and they’re making better and better electric cars. The car industry for Europe is an essential element of our industry, an essential element of our economy. But to be vibrant in the future, it has to see that the Chinese and the Americans and others are moving really quickly to electric mobility, and our car manufacturers know this. There are so many jobs in wind turbine building and heat pump building and solar panel building, in installing them, etc., etc.. 
All the facts, if you want to follow the facts, point to more jobs in the new economy. But – and there we have to have a discussion here in Parliament – how do people who have the old jobs today go to the new jobs of tomorrow? They need to be skilled. They need to be reskill. That’s a tremendous effort. Why don’t we concentrate our collective political force into this, into how we get Europe’s workers of today into the jobs of tomorrow? 
That is for me what is being a Social Democrat. Social Democrats look to the future knowing the past, because you can’t find the future without knowing the past. You have to live with the past, but not in the past. We have to be good ancestors, and for that we have to create the jobs of the future. "};"In the speech, the speaker mentions electric vehicles (EVs) in the following context:

""One of every second car sold in China now is electric, and they're making better and better electric cars.""

This sentence suggests that China has made significant progress in the adoption of electric vehicles, with a notable market share. The speaker also implies that European car manufacturers need to be aware of this trend and adapt to it in order to remain competitive.

Additionally, the speaker mentions jobs related to EVs, such as:

""...jobs in wind turbine building and heat pump building and solar panel building, in installing them, etc., etc.""

These jobs are part of the ""new economy"" that the speaker is advocating for, which is focused on sustainable energy and technology. The speaker suggests that there will be more jobs available in this sector than in traditional industries.

Overall, the speech highlights the importance of embracing electric vehicles and renewable energy technologies as a key aspect of Europe's future economic development."};0;1;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2023-09-11_20-3";"Nils Torvalds";"NA";"
    Introductory remarks from the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety. - Madam President! Commissioner. The European Parliament has made wise decisions and sometimes less wise decisions in various contexts.
    On May 8, 2003, we made a decision on renewable fuels. It did not take too many days before we eventually understood that this decision maybe was not the wisest in the world. This led to new negotiations and new decisions, since the part of the renewable fuels that we then recommended simply took up too much forest.
    Then, during the previous term, I was involved in making a decision on electric cars, and it may happen that we will have to re-evaluate what we have done at that point.
    But I would like to thank colleague Pieper for the cooperation and my shadows in ENVI for the cooperation. We managed to achieve a more or less satisfactory result. But I fear that we will return to the issue of renewable fuels in the coming years a few times. And I hope that you are wiser than I was at that time."};"According to the speech, the speaker mentions that they were involved in making a decision on ""electric cars"" during their previous term. This implies that the European Parliament made a decision related to electric vehicles at some point in the past. The speaker also hints that this decision may need to be re-evaluated in the future.

That's the entirety of the information provided about electric vehicles in the text. There is no further detail or discussion about electric vehicles beyond this brief mention."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2023-09-11_20-12";"Mislav Kolakušić";"NI";" –Respected chairman, the idea of renewable energy sources as a potential that can meet all the needs of humanity is ridiculous, absurd, disgusting and full of lies.
    Germany has prepared, at least large parts of Germany, and completely destroyed the landscapes of Germany with wind turbines, so it looks like we have been occupied by extraterrestrials.
    And how much electricity is enough? Not enough. They closed their nuclear power plants and import 30% of the electricity from French nuclear power plants and say: ""We are green."" And that's laughable.
    One electric car that is turned on needs to be extinguished with 17 thousand liters of water, which carries several kilograms of extremely harmful metals into our soil."};"According to the speech, one electric car that is turned on needs to be extinguished with 17 thousand liters of water, which carries several kilograms of extremely harmful metals into our soil. This statement implies that electric vehicles have a negative environmental impact due to the large amount of water required to cool them down and the presence of hazardous materials in the process."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;
"2023-09-12_3-16";"Angel Dzhambazki";"ECR";"
    Mr. Chairman, Commission, the European Commission is neither transparent nor open. The European Commission protects, preserves and lobbies for dubious green policies based on unscientific statements, based on lobbying that aims to change the way energy is produced in Europe and the way European economies work. This lobbying is against the interests of European taxpayers and European citizens, and of people who live and work, European entrepreneurs in the member states of the European Union. This is a fact.
    
    When we ask the European Commission how much the Green Deal costs, it answers ""Thank you for your question."" When we ask the European Commission how much the vaccines cost, which they ordered, who paid for them, it answers ""Thank you for your question."" When we ask what the carbon footprint of producing an electric car is, it answers ""Thank you for your question."" All this is lobbying, all this is bureaucracy, all this is a wall built by the Commission to prevent transparency on how much the insane, suicidal green policy will cost, which will leave people without jobs and which will make countries like Poland, Bulgaria and Romania dependent on external sources.
    
    Of course, this is shame and disgrace, but you know it yourself."};"According to the speech, when someone asks the European Commission what the carbon footprint of producing an electric car is, the answer is ""Thank you for your question."" This implies that the speaker is criticizing the European Commission for not providing a clear or transparent response to this question. The speaker does not provide any additional information about electric vehicles beyond this mention."};0;1;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2023-09-12_9-43";"Virginijus Sinkevičius";"NA";" Member of the Commission. – Mr President, honourable Members, thank you for your valuable reflections and views and let me briefly reply to the key points that you have raised.
First of all, I would like to stress again what I have said during my introduction. Proposed standards: they are both realistic and implementable and we assessed that we could not align, unfortunately, to WHO standards for 2030, but only setting a trajectory for revision close to 2028. But standards should apply as of 2030 and we cannot lose more time.
Secondly, as regards the air pollution improving: so, yes, it’s true, and those graphs that were shown. But it’s still a long journey for us ahead. We have managed to improve air quality. From 1 000 000 premature citizen deaths to 300 000 premature citizen deaths per year. So it’s 300 000 citizens too many every year. And I think this is our direct responsibility to take responsible decisions to ensure that this number is minimised.
As regards the funding, especially with the Member States that have the worst air quality, overall, EUR 147 billion will be available for clean air directly or indirectly in the current funding period for 2021 and 2027. And this can be used, for instance, for cleaner energy, sustainable transport or air quality monitoring. And it’s more than three times as much as what was available in the previous funding period. So to make sure we cover the needs across the Member States and sector, this involves a number of EU funding programmes and, of course, I hope that Member States will put a high priority and use those funds.
Now, as regards unachievable solutions to knock out the Alps. You don’t need to knock out the Alps. It’s true, our impact assessment recognises that without significant and additional local effort, only 6% of monitoring stations would be at risk of not meeting the proposed air quality standards by 2030.
One example is northern Italy, where specific meteorological and orographic circumstances lead to reduced dispersion and thus accumulation of air pollution and this is aggravated by elevated emission levels from residential heating, including biomass burning as well as agricultural emissions across the Po valley. So that is precisely why our proposal already provides for the possibility to postpone the attainment of deadlines in specific situations under specific conditions.
Yet we should not hold back the ambition level across the whole European Union to cater for a limited number of exceptions – exceptions that always come at a price for those that are exposed to poor air quality and who are very often the most vulnerable groups of the population.
Now, also, I hear the calls of those who said ‘Why are we not aligning fully to WHO guideline levels?’ – I truly wish to do so, but as I said, you know, we have to be bound by our impact assessment and put on the table the proposal that is realistic to implement across the Member States.
With this proposal, we revise air quality standards in two steps. First of all, we set intermediate 2030 EU air quality standards more closely aligned with WHO recommendations, which fully take into account technical feasibility and socioeconomic considerations. We set a clear trajectory for reaching a zero pollution objective, fully aligned with science, at the latest by 2050 through a regular review mechanism. This will allow us to move to full alignment with WHO recommendations as soon as new technology and policy developments allow us. And the first review will already take place in 2028 to prepare the post 2030 framework.
Honourable Members, dear colleagues, I truly count on your support for the overall approach of our proposal. It’s reassuring to hear from you, first of all, willingness to keep the ambition of our proposal. The Commission stands ready to assist you through the negotiations process. I think what’s extremely important to remember is that this debate shows that we agree on the core objective of protecting citizens. But there are different views in terms of timing and ambition. I can reassure you, and I hope I’ve managed to do that in my answers, that the Commission’s position is, first of all, to be realistic of what’s possible to implement in upcoming years.
So let’s remember that tomorrow’s vote is not the end. The most important part, of course, is going to come in the trilogues. The Commission stands ready to assist you throughout the process. And let me now call on you to ensure that we set a clear path towards a productive and conclusive discussion in the trilogues. I’m sure this is an issue where all of us want to reach an agreement before the next European Parliament elections, and I truly hope that we can swiftly agree to further improve this directive in the interests, first of all, of our citizens, for our environment and for our economy."};"There is no mention of electric vehicles in the provided speech. The text only discusses air quality, pollution, and the European Union's proposal for revising air quality standards, as well as funding for clean energy and sustainable transport. Electric vehicles are not mentioned at all."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2023-09-13_2-2";"Ursula von der Leyen";"NA";" President of the Commission. – Madam President, Ministers, honourable Members, in just under 300 days, Europeans will take to the polls in our unique and remarkable democracy. As with any election, it will be the time for people to reflect on the State of our Union and the work done by those that represent them. But it will also be a time to decide on what kind of future and what kind of Europe they want. Among them will be millions of first-time voters, the youngest of whom were born in 2008 – the economic and financial crisis. As they stand in that polling booth, they will think about what matters to them. They will think about the war that rages at our borders. Or the impact of destructive climate change. About how artificial intelligence will influence their lives. Or their chances of getting a house or a job in the years ahead.
Our Union today reflects the vision of those who dreamt of a better future after World War II. A future in which a Union of nations, democracies and people work together to share peace and prosperity. They believed that Europe was the answer to the call of history. And when I speak to the new generation of young people today, I see that same vision for a better future. That same burning desire to build something better. That same belief that, in a world of uncertainty, Europe once again must answer the call of history. And that is what we have to do together.
This starts with earning the trust of Europeans to deal with their aspirations and anxieties. And in the next 300 days we must finish the job that they entrusted us with.
I want to thank this House for its leading role in delivering on the most ambitious transformations this Union has ever embarked on. When I stood in front of you in 2019 with my programme for a green, digital and geopolitical Europe I know that some had doubts. And that was before the world turned upside down with a global pandemic and a brutal war on European soil. But look at where Europe is today. We’ve seen the birth of a geopolitical Union – supporting Ukraine, standing up to Russia’s aggression, responding to an assertive China, investing in partnerships. We now have a European Green Deal as the centrepiece of our economy and unmatched in ambition. We have set the path for a digital transition and become global pioneers in online rights. We have the historic NextGenerationEU, combining EUR 800 billion of investment and reform, and creating decent jobs for today and tomorrow. We have set the building blocks for a Health Union, helping to vaccinate an entire continent and large parts of the world. We’ve started making ourselves more independent in critical sectors like energy, chips and raw materials. I would also like to thank you for the groundbreaking and pioneering work we did on gender equality. As a woman, this means a lot to me. We’ve concluded files that many thought would be blocked forever, like the Women on Boards Directive and the historic accession of the EU to the Istanbul Convention. With the directive on pay transparency we have cast into law the basic principle that equal work deserves equal pay. There is not a single argument why, for the same type of work, a woman should be paid less than a man. But our work is far from over and we must continue pushing for progress together. I know this House supports our proposal on combating violence against women. And here too, I would like that we cast into law another basic principle: ‘no means no’. There can be no true equality without freedom from violence.
(Applause)
And thanks to this Parliament, to Member States and to my team of Commissioners, we have delivered over 90% of the political guidelines I presented in 2019. Together, we have shown that when Europe is bold and united, it gets things done. And our work is far from over, so let’s stand together. Let’s deliver today and prepare for tomorrow.
Honourable Members, four years ago the European Green Deal was our answer to the call of history. And this summer – the hottest ever on record in Europe – was a stark reminder of that. Greece and Spain were struck by ravaging wildfires and were hit again only a few weeks later by devastating floods. And we saw the chaos and carnage of extreme weather from Slovenia to Bulgaria and right across our Union. This is the reality of a boiling planet. The European Green Deal was born out of this necessity to protect our planet. But it was also designed as an opportunity to preserve our future prosperity. We started this mandate by setting a long-term perspective with the climate law and the 2050 goals. We shifted the climate agenda to being an economic one, and this has given a clear sense of direction for investment and innovation. And we have already seen this growth strategy delivering in the short term. Europe’s industry is showing every single day that it is ready to power this transition. Proving that modernisation and decarbonisation can go hand in hand.
In the last five years, the number of clean steel factories in the European Union has grown from zero to 38. We’re now attracting more investment in clean hydrogen than the United States and China together. And tomorrow I will be in Denmark with Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen to see that innovation at first hand. We will mark the launch of the first container ship powered by clean methanol made with solar energy. This is the strength of Europe’s response to climate change. The European Green Deal provides the necessary frame, incentives and investment, but it is the people – the innovators, the inventors, the engineers – who develop the solutions. And this is why, honourable Members, as we enter the next phase of the European Green Deal, one thing will never change: we will keep supporting European industry throughout this transition. They can rely on that.
(Applause)
We started with a package of measures, from the Net-Zero Industry Act to the Critical Raw Materials Act. With our industry strategy, we are looking at the risks and needs of each ecosystem in this transition, and we need to finish this work. And with this we need to develop an approach for each industrial ecosystem. Therefore, starting from this month, we will hold a series of Clean Transition Dialogues with industry. The core aim will be to support every sector in building its business model for the decarbonisation of industry. Because we believe that this transition is essential for our future competitiveness in Europe. And this is just as much about the people and their jobs today. Our wind industry, for instance, is a European success story, but it is currently facing a unique mix of challenges. And this is why we will put forward a European wind power package, working closely with industry and Member States. We will fast-track permitting even more. We will improve the auction systems across the European Union. We will focus on skills, access to finance and stable supply chains. But this is broader than just one sector. From wind to steel, from batteries to electric vehicles, our ambition is crystal clear: the future of our clean tech industry has to be made in Europe. This is our task.
(Applause)
Honourable Members, this shows that when it comes to the European Green Deal, we stay the course, we stay ambitious, and we stick to our growth strategy. And we will always strive for a fair and just transition. That means a fair outcome for future generations to live on a healthy planet. A fair journey for all those impacted – with decent jobs and a solemn promise to leave no one behind.
Just think about manufacturing jobs and competitiveness – a topic we’re discussing a lot these days. Our industries and tech companies like competition, they know that global competition is good for business and that it creates and protects jobs here in Europe. But competition is only true as long as it is fair. Too often, our companies are excluded from foreign markets or are victims of predatory practices. They are often undercut by competitors benefiting from huge state subsidies. We have not forgotten how China’s unfair trade practices affected our solar industry. Many young businesses were pushed out by heavily subsidised Chinese competitors. Pioneering companies had to file for bankruptcy. Promising talents went searching for fortune abroad. This is why fairness in the global economy is so important – because it affects lives and livelihoods. Entire industries and communities depend on it. So we have to be clear-eyed about the risks we face.
Take the electric vehicles sector: it is a crucial industry for the clean economy, with a huge potential in Europe. But global markets are now flooded with cheaper Chinese electric cars. And their price is kept artificially low by huge state subsidies. This is distorting our market. And as we do not accept this distortion from the inside in our market, we do not accept this from the outside. So I can announce today that the Commission is launching an anti-subsidy investigation into electric vehicles coming from China.
(Applause)
Europe is open to competition, but not for a race to the bottom. We must defend ourselves against unfair practices, but equally, it is vital to keep open lines of communication and dialogue with China. Because there are also topics where we can and have to cooperate. De-risk, not decouple: this will be my approach with the Chinese leadership at the EU-China Summit later this year.
Meine Damen und Herren Abgeordnete! In der Europäischen Union sind wir stolz auf unsere kulturelle Vielfalt. Wir sind das „Europa der Regionen“ mit einer ganz besonderen Vielfalt an Sprachen, Musik, Kunst, Traditionen, Handwerk und kulinarischen Köstlichkeiten.
Wir sind auch das Europa einer einzigartigen biologischen Vielfalt. Etwa 6 500 Arten kommen nur allein in Europa vor, nirgendwo anders auf der Welt. Im Norden Europas liegt das Weltnaturerbe Wattenmeer, ein einzigartiger Lebensraum der seltenen Tier- und Pflanzenarten, der ihnen eine Heimat bietet und für Millionen von Zugvögeln überlebenswichtig. Und mit der Ostsee haben wir das größte Brackwassermeer der Welt. Nach Süden schließen sich europäische Tiefebenen an, die von großen Mooren und Feuchtgebieten geprägt waren und sind. Diese Regionen sind wichtige Verbündete gegen das Fortschreiten des Klimawandels. Geschützte Moore und Feuchtgebiete binden große Mengen an Treibhausgasen, sichern nationale Wasserkreisläufe, regionale Wasserkreisläufe und beheimaten eine einzigartige Biodiversität.
Europas Waldreich: Von mächtigen Nadelwäldern im Norden und Osten über die letzten Urwälder von Eichen und Buchen in Mitteleuropa bis hin zu den Korkeichenwäldern Südeuropas liefern alle diese Wälder für uns nicht zu ersetzende Güter und Leistungen. Sie binden Kohlenstoff, sie liefern Holz und andere Produkte, sie erzeugen fruchtbare Böden, filtern Luft und Wasser. Biodiversität und Ökosystemleistungen sind für alle Menschen in Europa überlebensnotwendig.
Der Verlust dieser Natur zerstört nicht nur die Lebensgrundlage, sondern auch das Heimatgefühl von Menschen. Wir müssen sie schützen. 
(Beifall)
Und gleichzeitig muss auch die Sicherung unserer Lebensmittelversorgung mit und in der Natur Aufgabe sein und bleiben. Ich möchte heute unseren Landwirten meine Anerkennung aussprechen. 
(Beifall)
Meine Anerkennung und mein Dank dafür, dass Sie uns Tag für Tag mit Lebensmitteln versorgen. Gesunde Lebensmittel, für uns in Europa ist diese Aufgabe der Landwirtschaft die Grundlage der Agrarpolitik. Und auch die Unabhängigkeit in der Lebensmittelversorgung ist uns wichtig. Das leisten unsere Landwirte. Das ist nicht selbstverständlich. Denn die Folgen der russischen Aggression gegen die Ukraine, der Klimawandel mit Dürren, Waldbränden und Überflutungen, aber auch neue Verpflichtungen prägen zunehmend die Arbeit der Landwirte und ihre Einkommenssituation. Wir müssen dem Rechnung tragen. Viele setzen sich schon heute für eine nachhaltigere Landwirtschaft ein. Wir müssen zusammen mit den Menschen in der Landwirtschaft diese neuen Herausforderungen bewältigen. Nur so können wir unsere Lebensmittelsicherheit auch in Zukunft absichern.
Das heißt, wir brauchen mehr Dialog und weniger Polarisierung. Und aus diesem Grund möchten wir einen strategischen Dialog zur Zukunft der Landwirtschaft in der Europäischen Union starten. Denn ich bin und bleibe davon überzeugt, dass Landwirtschaft und Naturschutz zusammengehen können. Beides ist wichtig.
(Beifall)
Honourable Members, a fair transition for farmers, families and industry: this is the hallmark of this mandate. And it is all the more important as we face strong economic headwinds. I see three major economic challenges for our industry in the year ahead: labour and skills challenges, inflation, and making business easier for our companies.
The first has to do with our labour market. We have not forgotten the early days of the global pandemic when everyone predicted a new wave of 1930s-style mass unemployment. But we defied this prediction. With SURE – the first ever European short-time work initiative – we saved 40 million jobs. This is and was Europe’s social market economy in action, and I think we can be proud of it.
We then immediately restarted our economic engine thanks to NextGenerationEU. And today we see the results: Europe is close to full employment. Instead of millions of people looking for jobs, millions of jobs are looking for people. Labour and skills shortages are reaching record levels, both here and across all major economies. Seventy-four per cent of SMEs are saying they are facing skills shortages. In the peak of the tourist season, restaurants and bars in Europe are reducing their hours because they cannot find the staff they need. Hospitals are postponing treatments because of a lack of nurses and doctors. And two thirds of European companies are looking for IT specialists – two thirds! At the same time, millions of parents – mostly mothers – are struggling to reconcile work and family because there is no appropriate childcare. And 8 million young people are neither in employment, nor in education, nor in training – 8 million. Their dreams put on hold, their lives on standby. This is not only the cause of so much personal distress. It is also one of the most significant bottlenecks for our competitiveness. Because labour shortages hamper the capacity for innovation, growth and prosperity. So we need to improve access to the labour market, most importantly for young people, for women. And we need qualified migration.
In addition, we need to respond to the deep-rooted shifts in technology, society and demography. And for that we should rely on the expertise of businesses and trade unions, our collective-bargaining partners. It is almost 40 years ago since Jacques Delors convened the Val Duchesse meeting that saw the birth of European social dialogue. Since then, social partners have shaped the Union of today, ensuring progress and prosperity for millions. And as the world around changes faster than ever, social partners must again be at the heart of the future. Together we must focus on the challenges facing the labour market, from skills and labour shortages to new challenges like AI. This is why, together with the Belgian Presidency next year, we will convene a new Social Partner Summit, once again at Val Duchesse. The future of Europe will be built with and by the social partners. This is our task.
(Applause)
The second major economic challenge is persistent high inflation. Christine Lagarde and the European Central Bank are working hard to keep inflation under control. We know that returning to the ECB’s medium-term target will take some time. The good news is that Europe has started bringing energy prices down. We have not forgotten Putin’s deliberate use of gas as a weapon and how it triggered fears of blackout and an energy crisis like in the 70s. Many thought we would not make it through the winter because of a lack of energy. But we made it. We made it because we stayed united, pooling our demand and buying energy together. And at the same time – and different to the 70s – we used this crisis to massively invest in renewable energy and fast-track the clean transition. We used Europe’s critical mass to bring prices down and secure our supply. Just take this: the price of gas in Europe was over EUR 300 per megawatt hour one year ago. It is now around EUR 35: it was 300, today it is 35. So we need to look at how we can replicate this model of power – purchasing power at the market. A model of success also in other fields like critical raw materials and, for example, clean hydrogen.
The third challenge of European companies is about making it easier to do business. Small companies do not have the capacity to cope with complex administration. Or they are held back by lengthy processes. This often means they do less with the time they have, and that they miss out on opportunities to grow. This is why, before the end of the year, we will appoint an EU SME envoy reporting directly to me.
(Applause)
We want to hear directly from small and medium-sized enterprises about their everyday challenges. For every new piece of legislation we conduct a competitiveness check by an independent board. And next month we will make the first legislative proposal towards reducing reporting obligations at the European level by 25%.
(Applause)
Honourable Members, let’s be frank – this will not be easy. And we will need your support because this is a common endeavour for all European institutions. So we also have to work with Member States to match the 25% of reduction also at national level. I think it’s time to make business easier in Europe.
(Applause)
But European companies also need access to key technologies to innovate, develop and manufacture. And this is a question of European sovereignty, as the leaders underlined in Versailles. It is an economic and national security imperative to preserve a European edge on critical and emerging technologies. This European industrial policy also requires common European funding. And this is why, as part of our proposal for a review of our budget, we proposed the STEP platform. With STEP we can boost, leverage and steer EU funds to invest in everything from microelectronics to quantum computing and AI, from biotech to cleantech. Our companies need this support now. So I urge for a quick agreement on our budget proposal, and I know I can count on this House.
And there’s more when it comes to competitiveness. We have seen real bottlenecks along global supply chains, including because of the deliberate policies of other countries. Just think about China’s export restrictions on gallium and germanium, which are essential for goods like semiconductors and solar panels. This shows why it is so important for Europe to step up on economic security – de-risking, not decoupling. And I’m very proud that this concept has found broad support from key partners, from Australia to Japan and the United States. And many other countries around the world want to work together. Many are overly dependent on a single supplier for critical raw materials. Others, from Latin America to Africa, want to develop – rightly so – local value chains, local industries for processing and refining, instead of just shipping their resources abroad. This is why later this year we will convene the first meeting of our Critical Raw Materials Club.
At the same time, we will continue to drive open and fair trade. So far, we have concluded new free trade agreements with Chile, with New Zealand, with Kenya. We should aim to complete deals with Australia, Mexico and Mercosur by the end of this year, and soon thereafter with India and Indonesia. I think smart trade delivers good jobs and prosperity.
(Applause)
Honourable Members, these three challenges – labour, inflation and business environment – come at a time when we are also asking industry to lead on the clean transition. So we need to look further ahead and set out how we remain competitive as we do that. And that is why I have asked Mario Draghi – one of Europe’s great economic minds – to prepare a report on the future of European competitiveness. Because Europe will do ‘whatever it takes’ to keep its competitive edge.
(Applause)
Now, when it comes to making business and life easier, we have seen how important digital technology is. It is telling that we have far overshot the 20% investment target in digital projects in NextGenerationEU. Member States have used that investment to digitise their healthcare systems, justice systems, transport networks, and at the same time Europe has led on managing the risks of the digital world. The internet was born as an instrument for sharing knowledge, opening minds and connecting people. It still is, but it has also given rise to serious challenges – disinformation, spread of harmful content, risks to the privacy of our data. All of this led to a lack of trust and sometimes a breach of fundamental rights of people.
In response, Europe has become the global pioneer of citizens’ rights in the digital world. The DSA and DMA are creating a safer digital space where fundamental rights are protected. They are ensuring fairness, with clear responsibilities for big tech. This is a historic achievement and I think we should be proud of it.
The same should be true for artificial intelligence. It will improve – without any question – healthcare, boost productivity, address climate change. We need it. But we also should not underestimate the real threats coming from AI – mostly GenAI. Hundreds of leading AI developers, academics and experts warned recently in the following words, and I quote: ‘Mitigating the risk of extinction from AI should be a global priority alongside other societal-scale risks such as pandemics and nuclear war.’
AI is a general technology that is accessible, powerful and adaptable for a vast range of uses, both civilian and military. And it is moving faster than even its developers anticipated. So we have a narrowing window of opportunity to guide this technology responsibly. And I believe Europe, together with partners, should lead the way on a new global framework on AI, built on three pillars: guardrails, governance and guiding innovation.
First, guardrails. Our number one priority is to ensure AI develops in a human-centric, transparent and responsible way. And this is why, in my Political Guidelines, I committed to setting out a legislative approach in the first 100 days. You remember we put forward the AI Act, the world’s first comprehensive pro-innovation AI law. And I want to thank this House and the Council for the tireless work on this groundbreaking law. Our AI Act is already a blueprint for the whole world. We must now focus on adopting the rules as soon as possible and turn to implementation.
The second pillar is governance. We are now laying the foundations for a single governance system in Europe. But we should also join forces with our partners to ensure a global approach to understanding the impact of AI on our societies. Now, think about the invaluable contribution of the IPCC for climate. This is a global panel that provides the latest science to policymakers. I believe we need a similar body for AI – on the risks and on its benefits for humanity. Yes, with scientists, but also tech companies and independent experts all around the world. This will allow us to develop a fast and globally coordinated response, building on the work done by the Hiroshima Process and others.
The third pillar is guiding innovation in a responsible way. Thanks to our investment in the last years, Europe has now become a leader in supercomputing, with three out of the five most powerful supercomputers in the world. So we need to capitalise on that. And this is why I can announce today a new initiative to open up our high-performance computers to AI start-ups, that gives them the opportunity to train their models, but in a responsible way. But this will only be one part of our work to guide innovation. What we need is an open dialogue with those that develop and deploy AI. This dialogue happens already in the United States. As you know, seven major tech companies have already agreed to voluntary rules around safety, security and trust. It happens here, where we will work with AI companies so that they voluntarily commit to the principles of the AI Act before it enters into force – because we cannot lose time anymore. So now we should bring all of this work together towards minimum global standards for safe and ethical use of AI. Our people deserve it.
(Applause)
Honourable Members, when I stood here four years ago, I said that if we are united on the inside, nobody will divide us from the outside. And this was the thinking behind the Geopolitical Commission. Our Team Europe approach has enabled us to be more strategic, more assertive and more united. And that is more important than ever.
Our heart bleeds when we see the devastating loss of life in Libya and Morocco after the violent floods and earthquake. Europe will always stand ready to support in any way we can.
Or think about the Sahel region – one of the poorest yet fastest growing demographically. The succession of military coups will make the region more unstable for years ahead. Russia is both influencing and benefiting from the crisis, and the region has become fertile ground for the rise of terrorism. This is of direct concern for Europe, for our security and our prosperity. So we need to show the same unity of purpose towards Africa as we have shown towards Ukraine. This is a must. We need to focus on cooperation with legitimate governments and regional organisations. We need to develop a mutually beneficial partnership which focuses on common issues for Europe and Africa. And this is why, together with HR/VP Borrell, we will work on a new strategic approach to take forward at the next EU-AU Summit.
Honourable Members, history is on the move. Russia is waging a full-scale war against the founding principles of the UN Charter. This has raised immense concerns in countries from Central Asia to the Indo-Pacific. They are worried that in a lawless world they might face the same fate as Ukraine. We see a clear attempt by some to return to bloc thinking – trying to isolate and influence countries in between. And it comes at a time when there is a deeper unease in many emerging economies about the way institutions and globalisation work for them. These concerns are legitimate. These emerging economies – with their people and natural assets – are essential allies in building a cleaner, safer and more prosperous world. So Europe will always work with them to reform and improve the international system. We want to lead efforts to make the rules-based order fairer and make distribution more equal.
This will also mean working with new and old partners to deepen our connections, and here Europe’s offer with Global Gateway is unique. Global Gateway is more transparent, more sustainable and more economically attractive. Just last week when I was in Delhi, we signed I think the most ambitious project of our generation. The India-Middle East-Europe economic corridor. It will be the most direct connection to date between India, the Arabian Gulf and Europe: with a rail link that will make trade between India and Europe 40% faster, with an electricity cable and a clean hydrogen pipeline to foster clean energy trade between Asia, the Middle East and Europe, and with a high-speed data cable to link some of the most innovative digital ecosystems in the world and create business opportunities all along the way. These are state-of-the-art connections for the world of tomorrow: faster, shorter, cleaner. We need more of them.
(Applause)
And Global Gateway is making a real difference: I have seen it in Latin America, South-East Asia and across Africa, from building a local hydrogen economy with Namibia and Kenya, to a digital economy with the Philippines. These are investments in our partners’ economies and they are investments in Europe’s prosperity and security in a fast-changing world.
Mesdames et Messieurs les députés, chaque jour, les conflits, le changement climatique et l’instabilité poussent les populations à chercher refuge ailleurs. J’ai toujours eu la ferme conviction que la migration doit être gérée. Cela nécessite de la patience, des efforts de longue durée avec nos partenaires, et surtout de l’unité au sein de notre Union. Et c’est l’esprit du nouveau pacte sur la migration et l’asile.
Lorsque j’ai pris mes fonctions, il ne semblait pas y avoir de compromis possible en vue. Mais avec le pacte, nous avons trouvé un nouvel équilibre entre la protection des frontières et la protection des personnes, entre souveraineté et solidarité, entre sécurité et humanité. Nous avons écouté tous les États membres. Nous nous sommes penchés sur toutes les routes migratoires et nous avons traduit l’esprit du pacte en solutions pratiques.
Nous avons réagi rapidement et de manière unie à l’attaque hybride de la Biélorussie. Nous avons travaillé en étroite collaboration avec nos partenaires des Balkans occidentaux, et réduit les flux migratoires. Nous avons signé avec la Tunisie un partenariat qui apporte des avantages mutuels, au-delà de la migration, de l’éducation et des compétences professionnelles à l’énergie et la sécurité, et nous voulons maintenant travailler sur des accords similaires avec d’autres pays. Nous avons renforcé la protection des frontières. Les agences européennes ont augmenté leur coopération avec les États membres. Je veux remercier en particulier la Bulgarie et la Roumanie d’avoir montré la voie en mettant en avant les bonnes pratiques en matière d’asile et de retour. Elles l’ont prouvé, la Bulgarie et la Roumanie font partie de notre espace Schengen, laissons-les enfin entrer sans plus de retard!
(Applaudissements)
Mesdames et Messieurs, notre travail sur la migration se fonde sur la conviction que l’unité est à notre portée. Un accord sur le pacte n’a jamais été aussi proche. Le Parlement et le Conseil ont une occasion historique de le faire aboutir. Montrons que l’Europe peut gérer les migrations avec efficacité et compassion. Finissons le travail.
Honourable Members, we know that migration requires constant work, and nowhere is that more vital than in the fight against human smugglers. They attract desperate people with their lies and put them on deadly routes across the desert, or on boats that are unfit for the sea. The way these smugglers operate is continuously evolving. But our legislation is over 20 years old and needs an urgent update. So we need new legislation and a new governance structure. We need stronger law enforcement, prosecution and a more prominent role for agencies – Europol, Eurojust and Frontex. And we need to work with our partners to tackle this global plague of human trafficking. And this is why the Commission will organise an international conference on fighting people smuggling. It is time to put an end to this callous and criminal business.
(Applause)
Honourable Members, on the day when Russian tanks crossed the border into Ukraine, a young Ukrainian mother set off for Prague to bring her child to safety. When the Czech border official stamped her passport, she started to cry. Her son didn’t understand, and he asked his mother why she was crying. She answered, ‘Because we are home.’ ‘But this is not Ukraine,’ he said. So she explained ‘This is Europe.’ On that day, that Ukrainian mother felt that Europe was her home, because home, as she said, ‘is where we trust each other’. And the people of Ukraine could trust their fellow Europeans. Her name was Victoria Amelina. She was one of the great young writers of her generation and a tireless activist for justice. Once her son was safe, Victoria returned to Ukraine to document Russia’s war crimes. One year later she was killed by a Russian ballistic missile while having dinner with other writer colleagues. She was the victim of a Russian war crime, one of the countless attacks against innocent civilians.
Amelina was with three friends that day, including Héctor Abad, a fellow writer from Colombia. He is part of a campaign called ‘Aguanta, Ucrania’ – ‘Resist, Ukraine’ – created to tell Latin Americans of Russia’s war of aggression and attacks on civilians. But Héctor could never imagine becoming the target himself. Afterwards he said he did not know why he lived and she died. But now he is telling the world about Victoria to save her memory and to end this war. And I am honoured that Héctor is with us here today. I want to thank you, Héctor. I want to thank you and I want you to know that we will keep the memory of Victoria and all other victims alive. ¡Aguanta, Ucrania!
(Loud and sustained applause)
Honourable Members we will be at Ukraine’s side every step of the way for as long as it takes. Since the start of the war, four million Ukrainians have found refuge in our Union. And I want to say to them that they are as welcome now as they were in those fateful first weeks. We have ensured that they have access to housing, healthcare, the job market and much more, and, honourable Members, this was Europe answering the call of history. And so I am proud to announce that the Commission will propose to extend our temporary protection to Ukrainians in the European Union. Our support to Ukraine will endure.
(Applause)
We have provided EUR 12 billion this year alone to help pay wages and pensions, to help keep hospitals, schools and other services running. And through our ASAP proposal we are ramping up ammunition production to help match Ukraine’s immediate needs. But we are also looking further ahead. And this is why we have proposed an additional EUR 50 billion for over four years for investment and reforms. This will help build Ukraine’s future to rebuild a modern and prosperous country. And that future is clear to see. This House has said it out loud: the future of Ukraine is in our Union. The future of the Western Balkans is in our Union. The future of Moldova is in our Union.
(Applause)
And I know how important the EU perspective is for so many people in Georgia.
Honourable Members, I started by speaking of Europe responding to the call of history. And history is now calling us to work on completing our Union. In a world where some are trying to pick off countries one by one, we cannot afford to leave our fellow Europeans behind. In a world where size and weight matters, it is clearly in Europe’s strategic interest to complete our Union. But beyond the politics and geopolitics of it, we need to picture what is at stake. We need to set out a vision for a successful enlargement. A Union complete with over 500 million people living in a free, democratic and prosperous Union. A Union complete with young people who can live, study and work in freedom. A Union complete with vibrant democracies in which judiciaries are independent, oppositions are respected and journalists are protected. Because the rule of law and fundamental rights are always and will always be the foundation of our Union in current and in future Member States.
(Applause)
And this is why the Commission has made the Rule of Law reports a key priority. We now work closely with Member States to identify progress and concerns, and make recommendations for the year ahead. This has ensured accountability in front of this House and national parliaments. It has allowed for dialogue between Member States and it is delivering results. I believe that we can do the same for future Member States, and this is why I’m very happy to announce that we will open the Rule of Law reports to those accession countries who get up to speed even faster. This will place them on an equal footing with Member States and support them in their reform efforts, and it would help ensure that our future is a Union of freedom, rights and values for all.
Honourable Member States ... honourable Members!
(Laughter in the Chamber)
The next sentence is, ‘This is in our shared interest: Parliament, Member States and Commission’!
This is in our shared interest. Just think about the great enlargement of 20 years ago, we called it the European Day of Welcomes. And it was a triumph of determination and hope over the burdens of the past. And in the 20 years since, we have seen an economic success story which has improved the lives of millions.
I want us to look forward to the next European Day of Welcomes and the next economic success stories. I know this is not an easy road. Accession is merit-based, and the Commission will always defend this principle. It takes hard work and leadership. But there is already a lot of progress. We have seen the great strides Ukraine has already made since we granted them candidate status, and we have seen the determination of other candidate countries to reform. So honourable Members, it is now time for us to match this determination. And that means thinking about how we get ready for a completed Union. We need to move past old, binary debates about enlargement. This is not a question of deepening integration or widening the Union. We can and we must do both, to give us the geopolitical weight and the capacity to act. And this is what our Union has always done. Each wave of enlargement came with a political deepening. We went from coal and steel towards full economic integration. And after the fall of the Iron Curtain, we turned an economic project into a true Union of people and states.
I believe that the next enlargement must also be a catalyst for progress. We have started to build a Health Union at 27, and I believe we can finish it at 30+. We have started to build a European Defence Union at 27. I am convinced we can finish it at 30+. We have proven that we can be a Geopolitical Union and show that we can move fast when we are united. And I believe that Team Europe also works at 30+.
Honourable Members, I know this House believes the same. And the European Parliament has always been one of the main drivers of European integration. It has been so throughout the decades and it is once again today. And I will always support this House and all of those who want to reform the European Union to make it work better for citizens. And yes, that means including through a European Convention and Treaty change if and where it is needed.
(Applause)
But we cannot – and we should not – wait for Treaty change to move ahead with enlargement. A Union fit for enlargement can be achieved faster. That means answering practical questions about how a Union of over 30 countries will work in practice, and in particular about our capacity to act. The good news is that with every enlargement those who said it would make us less efficient were proven wrong. Take the last few years: we agreed on NextGenerationEU at 27. We agreed to buy vaccines at 27. We agreed on sanctions in record time – also at 27. We agreed to purchase natural gas not only at 27, but already including Ukraine, Moldova and Serbia. So it can be done.
But we need to look closer at each policy and see how they could be affected by a larger Union. And this is why the Commission will start working on a series of pre-enlargement policy reviews to see how each area might need to be adapted to a larger Union. We will need to think about how our institutions would work, how the Parliament and the Commission would work. We need to discuss the future of our budget in terms of what it finances, how it finances it and how it is financed. And we need to understand how to ensure credible security commitments in a world where deterrence matters more than ever.
These are questions we must address today if we want to be ready for tomorrow. And the Commission will play its part. This is why we will put forward our ideas to the leaders’ discussion under the Belgian Presidency. We will be driven by the belief that completing our Union is the best investment in peace, security and prosperity for our continent. So it is time for Europe to once again think big and write our own destiny.
(Applause)
Honourable Members, Victoria Amelina believed that it is our collective duty to write a new story of Europe. This is where Europe stands today. At a time and place where history is written. The future of our continent depends on the choices we make today, on the steps we take to complete our Union. The people of Europe want a Union that stands up for them in a time of great power competition, but also one that protects and stands close to them as a partner and ally in their daily battles. And we will listen to their voice. If it matters to Europeans, it matters to Europe. Think again about the vision and the imagination of the young generation I started my speech with. It is the moment to show them that we can build a continent where you can be who you are, love who you want, aim as high as you want. A continent reconciled with nature and leading the way on new technologies. A continent that is united in freedom and peace.
Once again, this is Europe’s moment to answer the call of history. Long live Europe!
(Applause)"};"There is no mention of electric vehicles in the provided speech. The speech focuses on topics such as Ukraine, European Union enlargement, rule of law, and the future of Europe, but does not mention electric vehicles at all. Therefore, there is no summary or information to provide regarding electric vehicles in this text."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2023-09-13_2-3";"Manfred Weber";"EPP";"on behalf of the PPE Group. – Madam President of the European Parliament, Madam President of the European Commission, Spanish Presidency, dear colleagues.
Madam President, thank you for your speech today. You are right: the state of the Union is strong, also thanks to your leadership and the good cooperation with this European Parliament. Together – you said it – we made the right decisions in the last years. The decision on the European vaccines – not to have first- and second class Europeans – right. The decision on setting up a recovery fund – right. The decision to make Europe the front-runner against climate change – right. The decision to stop EU funds if the rule of law is not respected – right. The decision on the Brexit agreement, on sanctions against Russia and the decision to support Ukraine and its accession to the European Union – right. Together we are stronger: that is the message we can deliver to European citizens.
Dear Iratxe, dear Stéphane, I also want to thank you for our successful cooperation during these crucial moments. The political engine of Europe works. The von der Leyen majority made it possible. For us, Europe is people’s home. We have to deliver for everyone and leave nobody behind. We must listen to the people’s concerns and not lecture them. And we have to build our bridges and not deepen the divisions in our society, and set people’s priorities for Europe.
I want to speak today about three EPP priorities.
First, this week, the European Commission lowered the economic outlook. Inflation is hitting all Europeans hard, the poorest even harder. That’s the biggest social question today. We need growth. We need jobs. We need decent incomes. We need prosperity. We need a strong industry. That is why your proposals today to reduce the bureaucratic burden with a competitiveness check, with a special envoy, with a moratorium, and to conclude new trade deals and to invest more in innovation is the right way. Competitiveness must be a priority for us. And that’s why I also thank you for the consideration to invite Mario Draghi to bring up further ideas.
And we welcome the new phase of the Green Deal. To be clear, we as the EPP supported 32 out of 34 Green Deal files. We believe in the basic idea of the Green Deal. It is our generation’s obligation to deliver. But we also listen to workers, to farmers, to SMEs, to youth. Producing, for example, more food, not less, is our answer to cut inflation on food prices. The EPP is the farmers’ party and we are the party of the rural areas. Innovating more, not selling our technologies to China is our answer to lead a world free of CO2. We want a European Green Deal, not a Chinese one. We do not want to see, as you said, Chinese electric vehicles benefiting from our ambitious climate approach. We have to think more in business, not in prohibition models for our industry. We need green jobs for Europeans.
And we have to be stronger and tougher when it comes to trade. Tougher because we need to activate now our trade defence instruments and to avoid a second solar panel attack from China, as you said today. And yes, also stronger on trade to build up a union of democracies founded on trade with Mercosur, Australia, India, Africa, and others. For us, trade and values go hand in hand. We have to strengthen our innovation union. Let us pull now the best minds together to be really on the front of innovation when it is about artificial intelligence and cancer research.
A second priority for EPP is migration. Europe today welcomes so many refugees as never before in our history. Look what we do currently for the Ukrainians. We help, we welcome, we protect – that’s the European DNA. But on our external borders, we must decide who can enter and who not. The state decides – and not the smugglers – who can enter into Europe. That’s why we welcome the moratorium of understanding between the European Union and Tunisia. We must work with our neighbours to solve the challenges like we did it also in the past with Turkey, and we must finalise the migration pact. It is a unique, even historic opportunity to give a proper answer. Now it is in our hands. Let’s do it. I count again on the von der Leyen majority to achieve this.
The third point I want to mention: what’s next for our European project. Twenty-five years ago, the euro was born. Despite many who criticised him, Helmut Kohl had a vision for Europe. What is the Europe of today? What is our project? First, Ukraine must win the war. And yes, Ursula, the merit-based approach of enlargement process is key to our approach towards Western Balkans, Moldova and Ukraine. We have to keep our promises.
But we need to go further. De Gasperi already knew what is needed for a good future. That is why he burst into tears when they told him in 1954 that the European defence community was rejected. I think we have to come back to De Gasperi’s idea. We need a European defence union, with a defence commissioner, joint European forces on land, sea and air by 2030, and all this embedded into a strengthened NATO as a strong European pillar. That is the leading project of our generation. We need to lead – that’s the best medicine against extremists. Not fear, anger or even hate shall define the debate. Optimism, vision, values and the readiness for the next step to become a real European Union is the answer. Let’s start today."};"The text mentions electric vehicles in one sentence:

""We do not want to see, as you said, Chinese electric vehicles benefiting from our ambitious climate approach.""

This sentence suggests that the speaker is concerned about China's electric vehicle industry potentially taking advantage of Europe's efforts to reduce carbon emissions and mitigate climate change. The speaker implies that they do not want European industries or technologies to be used by Chinese companies to produce electric vehicles, but rather wants to see European companies innovate and lead in this area themselves."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;
"2023-09-13_2-57";"François-Xavier Bellamy";"EPP";"
    Madam President, when discussing the Commission's balance, you talk about the strength of Europe and its effectiveness, but reality seems to be quite far from this chamber at times. As we speak, the Secours populaire announces that 20% of French people are living hand-to-mouth. Across Europe, one in three people is skipping a meal to make ends meet. Millions of households, craftsmen, and businesses can no longer afford their energy bills. Despite this return of poverty, the Commission has continued to impose constraints on those who work and produce in Europe.
    
    The building energy directive will worsen the housing crisis. The ""farm to fork"" strategy is reducing food production. Taxonomy is further accelerating industrial decline. You have spoken at length about electricity to speed up the installation of wind turbines, but there has been no word on nuclear power, which is Europe's primary source of decarbonized and accessible energy. You promise to reduce regulations, but they have only continued to pile up in recent years. The multiplication of constraints does not protect the environment, it merely makes us dependent on other countries that do not assume the same costs. We will not save the planet by buying electric cars in China. Similarly, we will not relaunch our economy by increasing qualified immigration, as you have said, but by qualifying those millions of young people who are still far from employment today.
    
    The only response to Europe's demographic winter is to support families and not further destabilize our countries by relying on them, on the talents of our countries, on knowledge, and the culture of European citizens. Yes, we can regain prosperity and the dynamism of our continent, but this requires opening our eyes to reality."};"According to the speech, it is mentioned that buying electric cars in China will not save the planet. This is stated as an example of how relying on other countries that do not assume the same costs can lead to environmental issues being solved at the expense of Europe's own economy and employment. The speaker argues that instead of importing electric cars from China, Europe should focus on supporting its own young people who are still far from employment today in order to relaunch the economy."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;
"2023-09-13_2-75";"Márton Gyöngyösi";"NI";"
    Madam President! As for the future of Europe, the greatest danger is the loss of economic sovereignty and the influence of foreign powers. Over the past decade, numerous manufacturing technologies have come exclusively under Asian, particularly Chinese, dominance without which our economies would not exist. For example, chip manufacturing or today's fashionable battery production.
    The USA has already recognized that its economy is too dependent on China in these technological areas and is taking necessary countermeasures. The influence of China has begun in Europe as well, but the EU has no response to this, let alone awareness of the problem.
    The fact that the issue of Chinese electric cars has only progressed to the point of requiring a subsidy investigation (such as the Commission) shows the situation is even worse. There are also some Union member states whose governments, contrary to European interests, act like Trojan horses, helping the influence of economically hostile powers, undermining Europe's common future. It's time for Europe to... (the President cuts off the speaker)"};"According to the speech, it is mentioned that ""today's fashionable battery production"" has come under Asian, particularly Chinese, dominance. This implies that the speaker is referring to the manufacturing of batteries for electric vehicles (EVs).

Additionally, the speaker mentions that there are ""Chinese electric cars"" and that the EU has only progressed to investigating whether they require subsidies, implying that these electric cars may be receiving unfair support.

In summary, the text mentions that battery production for electric vehicles has been dominated by China, and that Chinese electric cars have received some level of government support."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;
"2023-09-13_13-10";"Marie-Pierre Vedrenne";"Renew";"
    On behalf of the Renew group. - Mr. President, as of August 1st, 2023, China has a new framework for its exports of gallium and germanium, essential materials for our defense systems, for the semiconductors of our electric vehicles, for our 5G infrastructures, our LED lighting. Materials that cover 80% of our needs, which are now subject to possible restrictions by Chinese authorities.
    It is our laissez-faire attitude that has led us to this situation. It was time for Europe to have a framework for secure and sustainable supply of critical raw materials, to stop creating dependence, to prioritize partnerships with countries that share our values and principles, to ensure that the technological and environmental transition also contributes to fair development.
    Thus, with this work, we respond to a double challenge - reducing risks for Europeans and guaranteeing our strategic autonomy - without turning our backs on our partners, so as not to develop at the expense of their development. This is the vision we have defended with Nicola Beer, we must be proud of it and we must all be committed to the results."};"According to the speech, China has a new framework for exporting gallium and germanium, which are essential materials for:

* Semiconductors of electric vehicles

This is mentioned as one of the areas where these critical raw materials will be subject to possible restrictions by Chinese authorities."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;
"2023-09-13_13-11";"Henrike Hahn";"Greens/EFA";"
    On behalf of the Verts/ALE faction. - Mr. President! Europe needs a stable supply of critical raw materials for a competitive green industry. Raw materials such as lithium and rare earths are essential for solar panels, wind turbines, electric cars, and computer chips.
    The EU law on critical raw materials will now properly contribute to ensuring the supply of critical raw materials for the industry and diversifying it for small and medium-sized enterprises. For resources that we urgently need for green technologies and in the sectors of space and defense in Europe.
    Our focus must also be future-oriented: resource efficiency, circular economy. But it is clear that EU support for competitive economies: Made in Europe must always equally meet the highest possible social and ecological criteria.
    I think that the potential has not been fully utilized in the current CRMA compromise to sustainably support companies in the best possible way. And here the Trilogue can still improve. Accelerating approval procedures is in itself a good thing. However, it must not lead to undermining environmental and social standards. Here, standards with due care are very important.
    There is no truly sustainable mining. This has not been invented yet, honestly one must say - even if there are big and committed differences in considering sustainability, as I was able to see at various mines in the USA and Europe myself on site. But it is also important: Mining in Natura-2000 areas must remain taboo and affected and local communities must always be included as best as possible.
    And yet it is clear: The EU law on raw materials is an important part of the Green Deal and a necessary response to the Inflation Reduction Act and our strategic autonomy."};"According to the speech, electric cars are mentioned as one of the essential products that require raw materials such as lithium and rare earths. This implies that the production of electric vehicles is dependent on the availability of these critical raw materials.

In other words, the speaker is highlighting the importance of ensuring a stable supply of lithium and rare earths for the production of electric cars, which are considered a key component of the ""green industry""."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;
"2023-09-13_13-12";"Izabela-Helena Kloc";"ECR";"
    On behalf of the ECR group. - Mr. President! Dear colleagues and friends! The import of many raw materials, such as copper, magnesium or nickel, often depends on a single supplier. Usually, these are China. More and more frequently, they resort to blackmailing policies towards Europe. They do this by taking advantage of their dominant position in the global raw materials market. That is why I recommend that you vote in favor of adopting the ITRE report, but I would like to draw your attention to the amendment submitted on behalf of the group and kindly ask for your support for this amendment. It has also been signed by Polish MEPs from PPE and S&D - Jerzy Buzek and Łukasz Kohut. The amendment aims to add coal coke to the list of strategic raw materials. I believe that coal coke should also be included in this list of strategic raw materials. It is a raw material necessary for steel production, which in turn is necessary for the production of at least wind turbines or elements of electric cars, i.e., it supports the climate policy of the European Union. In addition, demand for this raw material will continue to grow, and currently there are no possibilities to replace it with other raw materials. The presence on the list of strategic raw materials guarantees numerous benefits, such as, for example, accelerated permit issuance process.

    Dear Members of Parliament, I kindly ask all of you for your support for this amendment number 2."};"According to the speech, electric cars are mentioned as one of the products that require steel production, which in turn requires coal coke as a raw material. The speaker states: ""it supports the climate policy of the European Union"" by mentioning wind turbines and elements of electric cars as examples of industries that rely on steel production."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;
"2023-09-13_13-13";"Isabella Tovaglieri";"ID";"
    In the name of the ID group. - Mr. President, honorable colleagues, Europe is not mistaken: with the new critical materials regulation, we can certainly create a European supply chain for these essential elements for the green transition, but we will not be able to free ourselves from dependence on China, Turkey, African countries, from which we import 98% of rare earths.
    Today, in fact, with the internal combustion engine ban still not operational and the ""green houses"" directive not yet approved, we are tied hand and foot to these countries that do not recognize our democratic values, who could not care less about environmental defense, and who are willing to do anything to grow at Europe's expense.
    And from tomorrow, we will be even more vulnerable. The demand for critical materials is set to increase exponentially: only the need for lithium, used in electric car batteries, is expected to grow 89 times by 2050.
    Geopolitical risks for Europe are very high: if we want to continue deciding our own future, the only solution is to slow down Brussels' mad race towards climate neutrality, reviewing the absurd deadlines imposed by the ""green"" directive. Environmental sustainability is a goal we share, provided that the price is not our development, our independence, and above all, our freedom."};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned related to electric vehicles:

1. The demand for lithium, used in electric car batteries, is expected to grow exponentially by 2050.
2. This growth is expected to be 89 times higher than current levels.

That's all the information provided about electric vehicles in the text."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;
"2023-09-13_13-32";"Barbara Thaler";"EPP";"
    Dear Mr. President, dear Mr. Commissioner, dear colleagues! We know what has happened to our solar industry, and we are witnessing what is happening to our wind industry. And one can guess what might happen to our automotive industry.
    Have we missed the boat? I therefore explicitly welcome that our Commission President today addresses the topic of ""Critical Raw Materials"" in her speech on the state of the Union so clearly and importantly.
    Here in this house, however, there is another side. In this house, it is now precisely those who would rather look to tomorrow than today, that we will only switch to electric cars, that we will only rely on wind power. These are precisely those who try to put hurdles in the way of the extraction of critical raw materials.
    So I sometimes have to wonder how one can simply ignore the consequences of their own demands. From me there will be an absolutely convinced yes to the Critical Raw Materials Act. We would have needed it a little earlier, as honest as I want to be. But I prefer to work on the future, and that's why I hope for broad support."};"According to the speech, it is mentioned that some people ""will only switch to electric cars"". This implies that there are individuals who advocate for the adoption of electric vehicles as a future-oriented solution. However, no further details or specific points about electric vehicles are discussed in the text. The main focus of the speech appears to be on critical raw materials and their importance for various industries, including the automotive industry."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;
"2023-09-13_13-33";"Achille Variati";"S&D";" – Mr. President, esteemed colleagues, critical raw materials play a fundamental role in accelerating the decarbonization of our continent.
    Europe is a continent poor in raw materials. For this reason, recycling should become increasingly important. Currently, however, the recycling rates of critical raw materials are too low and the infrastructure is not suitable for the specificity of these materials.
    A significant example is lithium, which is currently recovered with very low percentages but whose use will be the basis of the electrification of transport through the increasing spread of electric vehicles.
    A step forward has been made with the adoption of the battery regulation and now, with this regulation, we want to extend the approach to all strategic raw materials, in order to fully exploit the economic and environmental benefits offered by circularity.
    It is only with a full sustainable and circular approach that we can achieve strategic autonomy, while at the same time maintaining high environmental and social protection."};"According to the speech, electric vehicles are mentioned as an example of how lithium will be used in the future. The text states:

""A significant example is lithium, which is currently recovered with very low percentages but whose use will be the basis of the electrification of transport through the increasing spread of electric vehicles.""

In summary, the text mentions that lithium will play a crucial role in the ""electrification of transport"" due to the growing adoption of electric vehicles."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;1;
"2023-09-13_14-5";"Miapetra Kumpula-Natri";"S&D";"on behalf of the S&D Group. – Mr President, colleagues, Commissioner, we are talking about the new negotiations on agreements strengthening the supply chains of critical minerals between the EU and the United States. It is a crucial step towards enhanced cooperation on improving transatlantic cooperation that benefits us both.
Today the President of the Commission highlighted in her State of the Union speech that initiatives such as the Critical Raw Materials club are needed to foster international cooperation in critical materials. This would be a concrete step to start a club.
The European Parliament will do its part in encouraging the Commission to work towards an ambitious agreement with the United States. I want to thank the Chair, Bernd Lange, for his dedication and work he has put on these efforts.
We should aim to include as many minerals as possible, and recycled raw materials to ensure that EU exporters can be guaranteed a level playing field, as the Inflation Reduction Act gives tax credits for electric vehicles with the US origin, and it includes altogether 50 raw materials.
Agreements should be conducted swiftly, respect appropriate sustainability standards and the protection of workers’ rights, and fully respect the EU climate targets, WTO rules and enhance the EU’s own strategic autonomy. Strategic cooperation based on shared values, such as democracy and respect for human rights, form a solid base for mutually beneficial cooperation and trade.
Working on this cooperation is crucial for fostering supply chains of critical raw materials. There are good titles in tech and trade councils for the United States and the EU. This is part of the crucial steps that we can take. This is not the final but the first step. Bon courage!"};"According to the speech, the Inflation Reduction Act gives tax credits for electric vehicles with US origin. This is mentioned as an example of how the EU exporters may not have a level playing field, which is why it's important to include recycled raw materials in the agreements being negotiated between the EU and the US."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;1;0;0;0;
"2023-09-13_14-10";"Francisco José Millán Mon";"EPP";"
    Mr. President, Madam Commissioner, I consider the opening of negotiations for an agreement on fundamental or critical minerals between the European Union and the United States to be good news.
    This agreement seems necessary so that our exports of electric vehicles to the United States are not harmed by the Inflation Reduction Act passed last year, as has already been said. In this way, the European automotive industry, which has a great export vocation, can benefit from the clean vehicle subsidies granted by the United States and compete in the US market on equal terms with the United States and other third countries: Chile, South Korea, and Japan. We cannot lose competitiveness in such an important industry for Europe.
    I have had occasion to emphasize several times in this hemicycle that, in my opinion, it was a shame not to reach a free trade agreement with the United States during the Obama era when the work of what was called ATCI was already very advanced. If we had achieved it, it is possible that the situation would now be much easier and we might not even need this agreement.
    I am ending, Madam Commissioner, what timing, what schedule are we talking about? I believe that the negotiations for this agreement must be held and concluded as soon as possible. We have to be aware of the time we live in and not waste too much time because next year the administration in Washington may change and the new one could become a much more indifferent administration towards the European Union."};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned related to electric vehicles:

1. The speaker considers it good news that negotiations for an agreement on fundamental or critical minerals between the European Union and the United States will take place.
2. This agreement is necessary to avoid harming European exports of electric vehicles to the United States due to the Inflation Reduction Act passed last year.
3. The speaker believes that the European automotive industry, which has a great export vocation, can benefit from clean vehicle subsidies granted by the United States and compete in the US market on equal terms with other countries (Chile, South Korea, and Japan) if this agreement is reached.

In summary, the text mentions that electric vehicles are an important aspect of European exports to the United States, and that a new agreement between the EU and the US is necessary to ensure that these exports are not harmed by the Inflation Reduction Act."};0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;
"2023-10-02_16-8";"Margarita de la Pisa Carrión";"ECR";"
    On behalf of the ECR Group. - Madam President, Mr. Commissioner, Members of the European Parliament, the perspective of transport policies requires a broad vision to find affordable and accessible options for all citizens.
    But the reality is that there are more and more difficulties in mobility. Lack of safety on public roads, isolated rural areas and deserted cities in favor of large cities, public transportation that does not reach efficiently everywhere.
    The entry into cities today is a luxury only accessible to those who can buy an electric car. A worker who, with his effort, bought a vehicle, took care of it, maintained it, now he is forbidden to circulate.
    The increase in fuel prices has increased our lives. Going to work or school - and not traveling - is already a privilege. There is no more room for profit from any professional activity or trade, there is even no longer room for leisure, so necessary to breathe in front of the pressure of daily life.
    All these environmental policies are conditioning our way of life with difficulties, scarcity, and loss of freedom in our decisions."};"According to the speech, it is mentioned that:

* The entry into cities today is a luxury only accessible to those who can buy an electric car.
* A worker who bought a vehicle, took care of it, maintained it, is now forbidden to circulate (implying that this is due to the fact that they cannot afford an electric car).

In summary, the text suggests that owning an electric car is a privilege only accessible to those with sufficient financial means, and that this creates difficulties for others who are unable to afford one."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;
"2023-10-02_16-19";"Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska";"NA";"
    Moderator. – Thank you very much, Commissioner, for the positive remarks and noting that changes are needed, and above all, these barriers in today's world should not exist. 
    I would like to thank all those who participated in the debate today and those who worked on this report. I am delighted that this debate took place today and strongly believe that change is possible, and safe and sustainable transport is the key to achieving success in many aspects.
    
    Once again, I will explain why it is so important for transport to meet the needs of women. We emphasized here in the debate (or did we) that women make up more than half of society. Statistically, we take care of children more often, older people, the sick, more often use public transportation and are more exposed to attacks, exclusions, and various dangers, including harassment.
    
    The safety of women in public transport, eliminating barriers, availability should be the norm in today's world, not a challenge. Unfortunately, I think there is still a long way to go, although I believe that if we strongly insist and explain, we will significantly accelerate changes. 
    I would like to emphasize once again that if more women work in the transport sector, especially where decisions are made and where solutions are found, as a society we will not encounter absurd barriers and exclusions. And once again, I emphasize: the more women in planning policies and infrastructure and logistics solutions, the more efficient, greener, and friendlier transport will be. So, I believe that after today's debate, many barriers and problems that we all agreed on, which I am very pleased about, will be eliminated faster, for which I wish all the women and European women here."};"There is no mention of electric vehicles in the provided speech. The topic of transport is discussed, but it focuses on issues related to women's safety, accessibility, and representation in the transport sector, as well as the importance of sustainable and efficient transportation. There is no specific reference or mention of electric vehicles."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2023-10-03_4-36";"Jorge Buxadé Villalba";"ECR";" – (beginning of the intervention off-microphone) ... perfect for those over there, the ones who pay our salaries and suffer the consequences of their policies, to know how they think and what they vote. 
This Parliament asks to increase the financial framework by 76,000 million euros because its rotten Agenda 2030 has to be implemented. But not one more euro for farmers, ranchers, and fishermen. 
This Parliament asks for an additional 1,300 million euros for ordinary and financial expenses, but out there are those who cannot pay mortgages. It does not reduce nor one euro of ideological spending, nor private jets, nor supercar electric cars so that their lords can calm their climate conscience after pressing the green button and destroying any productive sector, such as the automotive industry. 
They ask for an additional 1,600 million to manage borders. Well, to continue financing NGOs in the Mediterranean and immigrant reception. But that is not managing borders, it is managing a defeat and misery. And another 9,000 million for collaborations and investments with neighboring countries. But over there, our compatriots are asking for protection against the neighborhood, the one from the east and the one from the south. 
And how do they want to pay for the party? With new taxes and raising taxes. You live absolutely out of touch with reality. I only hope that next year reality will come back to your house."};"According to the speech, it is mentioned that there are ""supercar electric cars"" that are being used by some individuals, specifically those who are referred to as ""their lords"". These individuals use these electric cars to calm their ""climate conscience"" after making decisions that have a negative impact on the automotive industry. This implies that the speaker views the use of electric vehicles as a symbol of luxury and excess, rather than a practical or environmentally-friendly choice."};0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;
"2023-10-04_10-36";"Helmut Geuking";"EPP";"
    Madam President, dear Commissioner, ladies and gentlemen, guests and colleagues present! Yes, paid housing or adequate housing is a human right, which we have established. That's the case, and that's why it's European law, all the more so as the nations are increasingly failing. As a German, I naturally look to Germany, but I cannot help feeling the impression that our small family party in Germany, the only remaining social party, is the family.
    When I look at what the traffic light coalition is currently cooking up in Germany: 400,000 apartments were promised, fully aware that since 1950 there have been an average of 405,000 apartments per year, 290,000 or 295,000 last year, which means 110,000 fewer on average than otherwise since 1950.
    That is a promise from the Chancellor based on the motto ""We will continue what we have been doing since 1950,"" more of nothing. 500 million for a project to charge electric cars with a single-family house - wonderful. The 280,000 people without housing will be delighted and will probably massively apply for these funds.
    So there is a need for action. We have to create affordable housing, and that apparently only works at the European level, because the right side laughs otherwise. With the help of the media, the right side will benefit from this, as social unrest is imminent. Because people and families can no longer put up with this and must not. They need housing, because it is a human right - I come back to that - and therefore we have to establish programs in Europe that also correspond to this human right."};"According to the speech, it is mentioned that:

* A project has been proposed to charge electric cars with a single-family house.
* The project will require 500 million euros.

That's all the information provided about electric vehicles in the text. There are no further details or mentions of electric vehicles beyond this point."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;
"2023-10-04_16-6";"Saskia Bricmont";"Greens/EFA";"
    On behalf of the Greens/EFA group. - Madam President, in 2021, the new trade strategy was placed under the sign of open strategic autonomy. Two years later, after the pandemic and the war in Ukraine, the EU is now obsessed with any promise to secure essential raw material supplies and is also seeking to multiply and accelerate free trade agreements, of which, unfortunately, the social, economic, local and climate effects are no longer to be proven.
    The pandemic made us realize how important questions such as relocation, food autonomy and strategic independence, and independence from global supply chains were. What is our strategic autonomy in relation to our ally, the United States, when it comes to concluding an agreement that would allow our car companies to benefit from tax exemptions on electric vehicles or an agreement on steel and aluminum?
    Other countries now understand that they have a real card to play against Europe, which does not have cobalt, lithium, gas in its soils. And I think the attack on Azerbaijan against Nagorno-Karabakh is not unrelated to this issue. Vietnam mocks the democratic clause of our free trade agreement, while September was particularly bloody in terms of human rights violations. Is it their role in the semiconductor value chain that gives them impunity that disgraces us?
    We cannot accept anything in exchange for new free trade agreements. This is also true with Mercosur countries. On the other hand, we can envisage new forms of partnership, because it seems clear that they cannot access our demands on sustainability, while we cannot access their demands to finalize the agreement, such as accepting compensatory measures in case the European Union adopts new legislation that would harm their economic interests. This would be completely contrary to the principle of strategic autonomy and would amount to putting on ice regulations like those on animal welfare and endangering our regulation on forced labor that exists in Latin America.
    Beyond the consequences of the agreement for the European agricultural sector and the good health of the Amazon and indigenous populations, agreeing to compensation from Mercosur comes down to giving them a veto right over our own legislative initiatives. We have a clear roadmap, the TSD, the Gender Action Plan III. We have sustainable development objectives. It is there our path lies, both in terms of sustainable development and trade policy."};"According to the speech, it is mentioned that the EU is seeking to conclude an agreement with the United States that would allow European car companies to benefit from tax exemptions on electric vehicles. This is presented as one of the issues related to strategic autonomy, implying that the EU's dependence on the US for such agreements could be a limitation on its ability to make decisions independently."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;
"2023-10-04_16-8";"Marco Campomenosi";"ID";"
    In the name of the ID group. - Madam President, honorable colleagues, Madam Commissioner, competitiveness, growth and strategic autonomy are all objectives that we share, we absolutely share them all. The problem is that what is happening in these years is exactly the opposite, and it's not the fault of the Commission, it's the fault of many factors and maybe we are doing too much analysis on ourselves and less on what happens in the rest of the world.
    
    There is a fact: the United States - since we talk so much about China - for a few months now they have been importing more from Mexico than from China. This is a fact that was not such at least since 2003. And we, our Mexico we would have it, there is an area of the Mediterranean where we should channel investments, growth and stability to shorten supply chains on which we have depended for too long and which are too fragile. So, the impact that the free trade agreements will have - certainly some are very positive - I do not believe will be so fundamental if we do not reduce our dependence on some subjects.
    
    The Green Deal, as we have legislated it, does nothing more than increase our dependence on China. We have talked so much about raw materials and energy resources. There are tensions in the markets of so-called commodities that are important. It was good for von der Leyen to say a few weeks ago that he wants to open an investigation into Chinese cars, but it's already the best-selling electric car in Spain and in other countries of the Union.
    
    On GSP, the generalized preference system, we are blocked because there are political groups that do not want to include in what is a complex, ambitious and important commitment of the countries that benefit from trade agreements with us, the relocation of those citizens who do not have the right to be on our territory.
    
    I could talk about the steel scrap we export to Turkey, which then sells us back after working on it, an important resource that serves our industry.
    
    In short, I would not want us to continue being the only ones and the only ones to defend the WTO and its system of rules, creating deindustrialization in our continent and a process of delocalization of missions that seems quite hypocritical to me."};"According to the speech, it is mentioned that China has become the best-selling country for electric cars in Spain and other countries of the European Union. This is stated as a fact, with no further elaboration or commentary on the topic. The speaker does not express any opinion or make any claims about electric vehicles themselves, but rather uses this information to criticize the EU's dependence on China for raw materials and energy resources."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;
"2023-10-04_16-29";"Catharina Rinzema";"Renew";"
    Chairman, how is money earned in the Netherlands? That happens through trade. Thanks to trade we have jobs and prosperity in the Netherlands, in Europe, and throughout the world. And if, for example, we need raw materials for electric cars, we need trade with other countries. Without trade there can be no prosperity and also no green transition. We need trade for our position as the Netherlands in the world. Thanks to trade agreements, we can make that green transition, create jobs, and ensure that the Netherlands and Europe are safer and stronger. But it is strange how difficult it turns out to be to conclude trade agreements.
    Commissioner, I would like to ask you during your last term of office to show ambition in terms of trade agreements because China is not waiting. And are we waiting?
    Chairman, we must now as quickly as possible conclude new trade agreements with Australia, New Zealand, Chile, Mexico and Mercosur."};"According to the speech, it is mentioned that ""raw materials for electric cars"" are needed through trade with other countries. This implies that the speaker believes that electric vehicles require certain raw materials that can only be obtained through international trade."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;
"2023-10-04_17-8";"Isabella Tovaglieri";"ID";"
    In the name of the ID group. - Mr. President, honorable colleagues, I first address the left-wingers present in this Hall, but they are increasingly less present among the general public and in the governments of European nations. After you have impoverished families by doubling mortgages, after you decided to force them to buy an expensive electric car, maybe produced in China, and after you will have forced them to indebt themselves to renovate their house, lest it be devalued, there is nothing left for you but these ideological crusades, in the name of the LGBT lobby, against democratically elected governments that oppose your politically correct.
    Fortunately, this Parliament remains one of your last strongholds. Election after election, all over Europe citizens are soundly rejecting the political agenda based on asterisks and the criminalization of the family, as demonstrated by the surreal debate carried out in Italy on a harmless television commercial.
    Minority rights are an important and delicate issue that cannot and must not be politically instrumentalized to attack pretextually opponents, as you have been doing today, in a desperate attempt to divert public attention from your increasingly evident political failures."};"According to the speech, it is mentioned that some people are forced to buy an ""expensive electric car"" produced in China. This is presented as one of the ways in which families have been impoverished by the actions of the government or left-wing group being addressed. The speaker implies that this is part of a broader effort to burden families with debt and financial struggles, rather than promoting sustainable or environmentally-friendly transportation options."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;1;0;
"2023-10-17_12-2";"Maroš Šefčovič";"NA";" Executive Vice-President of the Commission. – Madam President, honourable Members of the European Parliament, I am pleased to present to you the Commission’s work programme for 2024, the last of this mandate.
It comes at an important moment with the European elections just eight months away, and we can look back at the unprecedented challenges and opportunities Europe has experienced over the past four years: from the climate and biodiversity crisis to the digital revolution and artificial intelligence, from Russia’s brutal invasion of Ukraine to the ensuing energy price and cost of living crisis, from migration to ensuring economic growth and competitiveness, and, of course, the situation in Israel and in Gaza following the attacks by Hamas terrorists on 7 October.
In response to all these challenges and all these crises, our Union has repeatedly demonstrated its solidarity and unity: from the EUR 800 billion NextGenerationEU plan to modernise our economies, to the joint purchase of vaccines, gas and ammunition. Our rescue missions are helping those affected by wildfires, floods and other disasters in the EU and beyond, and our far-reaching support for Ukraine and its people continues, amounting to a total of EUR 82 billion to date.
Amidst all this, we have never lost focus on our overall ambitions. This Commission has so far delivered over 90% of the initiatives President von der Leyen announced in the political guidelines in this House. In doing so, we have demonstrated that we can achieve a lot when we act together, but our work is far from done.
When President von der Leyen delivered the State of the Union address one month ago in this Parliament, she made it clear that we need to continue delivering today to build the future of Europe for tomorrow. To that end, in 2024, we will put a strong focus on supporting the co-legislators in reaching agreement on pending proposals. Only a very limited number of new initiatives will be put forward in order to deliver on existing commitments or respond to emerging challenges.
Reducing burdens for the benefit of businesses and citizens will be another main priority. One key task for Europe is to make sure that our businesses remain competitive in current global and economic context. This is particularly true for our small and medium-sized enterprises, so we will continue our work to reduce report requirement burdens by 25%.
The potential cost savings of the proposals already adopted in this area underline the tangible benefits these measures can bring. For example, the reform of the Union Customs Code could bring EUR 2 billion in savings and the revision of the Regulation on European statistics, another EUR 450 million.
Today, we have put forward additional proposals, including to postpone the deadline for the adoption of the sector-specific European sustainability reporting standards. This will provide additional time for stakeholders to adapt. We have also proposed to adjust the threshold of the Accounting Directive so more than a million companies can benefit from reduced reporting requirements.
We will need to work together with other EU institutions and the Member States to make this ambition for 25% reduction in reporting requirement burdens a reality. To help ensure we stay on track, the progress we make will be reflected in the annual burden surveys starting next year, with the survey for 2023.
We will continue our efforts to ensure that the green transition is done in a fair, smart and inclusive way. To this end, we will initiate the series of the Green Dialogues in order to fully and directly engage with citizens, as well as the Clean Transition Dialogues with industry and social partners. We are also setting up a strategic dialogue on the future of agriculture in the EU.
Under the European Green Deal, we will launch the process to establish a 2040 climate target to keep the EU on course towards climate neutrality by 2050. We will soon present our wind power package to boost the wind industry and accelerate energy independence. An initiative on water resilience will seek to ensure access to water for people, nature and the economy.
For Europe to boost its world leading innovation, we will open our high-performance computers to start-ups working on artificial intelligence. We will also propose a digital network strategy that will safeguard EU industry leadership and facilitate the emergence of secure pan-European networks. Under the Critical Raw Materials Club, we will work with our partners around the world to strengthen global supply chains of raw materials.
Together with the Belgian Council Presidency, we will convene a social summit at Val Duchesse to discuss, among other things, the challenges facing our labour market. Based on the demand of this House, we will also present an initiative on European Works Councils.
To continue our efforts towards a stronger Europe in the world, we will push forward with our trade agenda and continue our work on the anti-subsidy investigation into electric vehicles from China. Under promoting the European way of life, our concerted efforts need to be directed towards securing an agreement on the pact on asylum and migration, and I welcome the progress made in the past weeks. To strengthen these efforts, we will also present a proposal to update the framework to fight smuggling of migrants.
With a Conference on the Future of Europe, the reinforced follow-up to Parliament’s own initiative reports, and with our substantive work on the rule of law, we have given a new push to European democracy. While the focus in this headline ambition should be on agreeing the key pending proposals ahead of the elections, we will also propose a Council recommendation on the development and strengthening of child protection systems.
Honourable Members, Madam President, good policymaking is a team effort. In the short time we have before June 2024, constructive negotiations in good faith on important pieces of legislation will be paramount. Thank you and I look forward to your interventions."};"According to the speech, there is one mention related to electric vehicles:

""...we will push forward with our trade agenda and continue our work on the anti-subsidy investigation into electric vehicles from China.""

This sentence indicates that the European Commission is investigating a potential subsidy issue related to electric vehicles imported from China."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2023-10-17_12-24";"Antonio Maria Rinaldi";"ID";"
    Madam President, Mr. Commissioner, esteemed colleagues, the Green Deal will entail enormous problems, especially in the area of execution. Switching from a fossil fuel-based energy system to one based on electrification will not only involve the restructuring of the entire energy infrastructure but also a total review of supply chains.
    The transition towards renewable energy, as desired by the European Commission, will then lead to an increase in demand for critical metals, including copper, lithium, nickel, manganese, cobalt, graphite, molybdenum, zinc, rare earths and silicon, whose supply is firmly in the hands of China. On the other hand, Europe does not have adequate extraction and refining capacity for minerals, so we are doomed to be dependent on imports from a few leading countries in the sector, which may impose export restrictions.
    The Beijing government continues to store raw materials, holding today 93% of global stocks of copper, 74% of those of aluminum and many others, exposing us to economic and geopolitical blackmail. Moreover, China itself is also the undisputed leader in refining a wide range of minerals, making it the world's leading producer of electric vehicles at competitive costs.
    But the biggest mistake made by the Commission was to entrust the energy transition exclusively to electricity and not to accept the principle of technological neutrality, making citizens and companies pay the cost of this wrong choice. Some members of the Commission, not driven by ideological fanaticism, are aware of how much an electric car costs? For a small car, it takes at least 35,000 euros: in practice, a transition to renewable energy for only the rich."};"According to the speech, China is the ""world's leading producer of electric vehicles at competitive costs"". This means that China has a significant advantage in producing electric vehicles, likely due to its dominance in refining minerals such as copper, aluminum, and others.

The speaker also mentions that an electric car costs at least 35,000 euros for a small car, implying that the transition to renewable energy may only be accessible to wealthy individuals."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;1;0;
"2023-11-08_17-2";"Kadri Simson";"NA";" Member of the Commission. – Madam President, honourable Members, I am glad to discuss with you the state of our energy union and the challenges ahead.
2022 was a watershed year. Europe’s energy system was shaken by an unprecedented energy crisis triggered by the Russian war against Ukraine. Changes happened at a fast pace. The state of the energy union report provides a rich set of data to look back at last year’s events and assess their impact.
As usual, the main document is accompanied by specific reports on key topics, such as the progress in implementing the national energy and climate plans, climate action progress, progress on competitiveness of clean energy technologies and energy subsidies.
This year, we have placed a particular focus on clean technologies and we presented at the same time of the report, the wind power package – a plan with concrete actions to support the resilience of the wind power sector in Europe.
Looking back, the state of the energy union report shows that the EU responded effectively to the energy crisis. The REPowerEU agenda has worked well and helped avoid the worst effects of the crisis. By acting together in solidarity and unity, we managed to drastically reduce our dependence on Russian fossil fuel imports by completely phasing out imports of Russian coal, reducing our dependence on Russian oil by around 90%, and reducing imports of Russian gas by 75% between March 2021 and March 2023.
Between August 2022 and August 2023, gas demand went down by more than 18% compared to the previous five-year average. Gas storage facilities were filled up to 95% ahead of last winter, playing a key role in preventing market disruptions. We have diversified our energy supplies towards more reliable, non-Russian suppliers – also through the EU energy platform created in April 2022.
The crisis forced us to give priority to energy security, but this did not derail progress on the clean transition. EU greenhouse gas emissions decreased by around 3% in 2022, continuing the downward trend of the last 30 years. If all Fit for 55 measures are implemented, we will be on track towards the EU’s 2030 target of cutting greenhouse gas emissions by 55% – and possibly even surpass it.
The installation of renewable energy capacities increased by 47%. In 2022, for the first time, more electricity was produced from wind and solar than from gas-fired power plants. In 2022, sales of heat pumps rose to unprecedented levels, with an increase of 39%. The sales of electric vehicles went up by 28% compared to 2021. In 2021, the EU’s primary and final energy consumption were 3.2% and 1.8% respectively lower than in 2019 – despite the COVID crisis recovery.
Even with some headwinds, investments in the clean tech industry have shown a stronger resilience than many expected. And on the legislative side, key Fit for 55 initiatives were adopted, sometimes with an even higher ambition than their original proposals, in line with REPowerEU. For instance, the EU agreed higher 2030 targets for renewable energy and energy efficiency.
In short, the state of the energy union report shows that despite the energy crisis, the EU delivered on its commitment to climate action and fast tracked its clean transition.
But this 2023 report is not only important for what it says about our past actions – it is valuable because it points us to where we need action ahead of next year’s European elections.
Let me mention five lessons we can draw from this report. First, Europe is today better prepared and has stronger crisis management tools than one year ago. Yet we remain exposed to energy shocks. A crisis in the Middle East, with markets still fragile due to the effects of the Russian war, could have wide-ranging impacts. Likewise, any incidents on key energy infrastructure may rapidly affect the sentiment of very nervous energy markets. This means that we must continue our diversification efforts and we must keep a vigilant posture, pursuing prudent policies.
While we are integrating some crisis response tools into our long-term legislative framework, we should consider continuing the temporary emergency regimes introduced in 2022. These have been essential last year to go safely through the crisis – and I am referring here to the regulations on gas solidarity, on the market correction mechanism and on the permitting for renewables.
Second, we must not lose momentum on renewables. For that, we need to focus on implementation. One of the key bottlenecks to make grids fit for a decarbonised energy system lies in the time needed to reinforce and expand them. That’s why, after the wind power package, I will propose an action plan for grids at the end of this month. It will include measures to address barriers – including regulatory, financial and permitting issues – and ensure better, smarter use of existing grids.
Third, investors and industry need now clarity on how Member States will translate the new energy and climate targets and objectives into concrete national measures and which public funding can be leveraged. Timely, updated national energy and climate plans are key here, and only 21 Member States have so far submitted the draft updated plans, which were due by June this year. So it is urgent that Member States who have not done so deliver their plans.
Fourth, we need to preserve Europe’s position in the ongoing clean technology race. We are in a good position in a number of technological sectors, but we need targeted attention to areas like wind, some parts of solar industry, cables and products for energy-efficient buildings.
In the hydrogen sector, we need to push industry to move from plans on paper to final investment decisions. Skills and venture capital investment are also key areas of vulnerability across the board. Therefore, reaching an agreement on the necessary infrastructure before the end of the parliamentary term would be very important.
Reinforcing competitiveness will also go hand in hand with reviewing energy subsidy schemes. Last year, the report shows, fossil fuel subsidies increased significantly to shelter consumers and industry from surging prices and it is very important that these costly subsidies are progressively scaled down.
Let me conclude with the final point on energy poverty. Last year, around 40 million people were unable to keep their homes warm enough. This is nearly 10% of the EU’s population, a sharp increase from just under 7% in 2021. This winter will bring again anxiety and concerns for many more citizens. We need to take swift and targeted action to address the underlying root causes of energy poverty.
Over the past year and a half, the Commission has taken many steps to protect consumers and we need to continue. I have presented two weeks ago a recommendation on energy poverty, and on the same day, Commissioner Reynders and I welcomed the renewal of the joint declaration signed by key stakeholders in the energy sector. And this declaration helps to protect vulnerable consumers from disconnection until the entry into force of the electricity market design.
Honourable Members, this Parliament and this Commission started the mandate with a strong commitment to tackle energy, climate and environmental challenges. The 2023 state of the energy union report shows that despite a unique set of challenges, we stayed the course. We jointly achieved what we set out for and we are on the correct trajectory.
I want to pay tribute to you, honourable Members and the work of this Parliament and the clean energy transition, but let’s not be mistaken: the coming months will be challenging. We have now seven months before the European elections, and let’s work together to close the open legislative files in the field of energy, ensure robust crisis preparedness and leave, at the end of this mandate, the EU on the right trajectory to achieve its 2030 targets. And now I’m looking forward to hearing your views."};"According to the speech, the following information is mentioned regarding electric vehicles:

* In 2022, sales of electric vehicles went up by 28% compared to 2021.
* This means that more electricity was produced from wind and solar than from gas-fired power plants in 2022.

That's all the information provided about electric vehicles in the text."};0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2023-11-08_17-16";"Paolo Borchia";"ID";"Mr. President, Madam Commissioner, it is quite right to decarbonize, the path is the right one, we must try to produce, cultivate, and nourish ourselves by polluting less.
In this reasoning, however, I believe there is a great absence, the absence of energy diplomacy, because Europe cannot become the traffic-restricted area of the world. Traffic-restricted areas are those areas in our cities where one goes for a walk and to shop, but nobody works there. I believe that the tangible risk is this, trying to avoid the competitiveness problems that our companies are suffering every day.
Then there is the big theme of dependencies. Many colleagues have legitimately reasoned on the successes of freeing ourselves from gas imports from Russia, but no one realizes that we are getting into the dead-end of dependence on raw materials, supply chains, and Chinese technologies.
We have faced several excessive legislative excesses: the directive on energy performance in construction, which in Italy citizens have learned to know as the ""green houses"" directive, with an implementation plan that is absolutely unrealizable. Without forgetting the theme of the obligation to introduce electric cars and no one has explained how we will generate all the electricity needed to guarantee electric mobility.
So it's not just electrification, there are arguments to be opened, for example, on the subject of nuclear power. Enough with the fairy tale of fossil fuel dependence, since gas will be a backup technology necessary for the next few years and, above all, I believe that the priority is to avoid Europe becoming the ZTL of the world."};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned regarding electric vehicles:

1. The obligation to introduce electric cars has been imposed, but no one has explained how all the electricity needed to guarantee electric mobility will be generated.

That's the only mention of electric vehicles in the text. It seems that the speaker is questioning the feasibility of widespread adoption of electric vehicles without a clear plan for generating sufficient electricity to support them."};0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;
"2023-11-08_18-2";"Alexandr Vondra";"NA";"rapporteur. – Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, almost a year has passed since the Commission published its Euro 7 proposal. Unlike previous regulations, Euro 7 encompasses a broad range of vehicles, all within a single legal framework. For the first time, this legislation also contains rules affecting electric vehicles. 
No matter which politician you ask, they will all claim to be committed to a sustainable automotive industry. However, the crucial difference is whether the rules being pushed for Euro 7 are realistic.
I support the Commission’s goal of producing cleaner cars and improving the quality of the air. But we must also act with due care and caution, not least because the sector accounts for more than 9 % of GDP, 26 % of manufacturing and 24 % of exports in the country I know best. 
The Commission’s original proposal would have a hugely negative impact on consumers and car manufacturers – an impact which is disproportionate to its positive environmental effects. Firstly, it would divert resources from decarbonisation by requiring substantial investment in soon-to-be-obsolete internal combustion engine technology. Secondly, there are serious questions over the feasibility of the Commission-recommended standards, especially in view of short lead times. Thirdly, the cost implications are a major cause of concern, as they would have exceeded the estimates in the proposal’s impact assessment. This in turn would have led to higher costs for consumers that are already grappling with the challenges of rising costs of living.
It was therefore imperative to rework the Commission text and establish a better balance between the environmental objectives and the concerns of consumers and manufacturers. After four months of negotiations, I believe that the mandate adopted in the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety largely achieves that.
First, testing parameters are not a revolution as the Commission proposed, but an evolution from the Euro 6 parameters, which ensures that the new emission standards remain economically and technologically feasible.
Secondly, under these testing conditions, the report is able to correspond with the levels proposed by the Commission for pollutant emissions for passenger cars, and proposes additional three categories for light commercial vehicles based on their weight.
Thirdly, the adopted text also proposes tougher limits for exhaust emissions from the buses and heavy-duty vehicles, including levels set for the real driving emissions. Forced to avoid legal and investor uncertainties, specific implementation timeframes have been included that, in turn, are linked to the entry into force of all relevant secondary legislation. Once all the relevant secondary legislation is complete, new types of fully duty vehicles would have 24 months, and new types of heavy-duty vehicles 48 months, to comply. All existing types of the light-duty vehicles will have 36 months, and heavy-duty vehicles 60 months, to ensure compliance.
The sixth report also better aligns EU methodologies and limits for brake particle emission and tyre abrasion rates with UNECE standards, as well as asking for more ambitious yet achievable goals for electric vehicles’ battery-durability standards.
Generally, I believe the committee report represents our best opportunity at securing an interinstitutional agreement ahead of the elections. Why? Because the Council has raised many comparable concerns over the cost, timing and technical feasibility. For that reason, we can already see the outline of possible landing space for the compromise between the co-legislators. It is therefore essential that Plenary endorse my committee report."};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned regarding electric vehicles:

1. For the first time, Euro 7 legislation contains rules affecting electric vehicles.
2. The report proposes more ambitious yet achievable goals for electric vehicles' battery-durability standards.

These are the only two mentions of electric vehicles in the text."};0;1;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;
"2023-11-08_18-3";"Helena Dalli";"NA";" Member of the Commission. – Mr President, rapporteur Vondra, shadow rapporteurs, honourable Members, I thank you all for the progress made on this important and, I would say, complex file. A file that has been subject to significant debate in this House, but also in the Commission and among stakeholders because it touches upon essential aspects of our daily lives.
The Commission’s proposal relied on solid evidence and rigorous assessments, and we made our proposal to respect three main principles, which I trust we can all agree with. One is improving air quality to lower the number of premature deaths in the EU – 70 000 people in Europe die prematurely every year due to air pollution from cars, vans, buses and trucks. Secondly, putting clean vehicles on the market at affordable prices for our citizens, so that citizens across the EU can actually afford new vehicles and not only second-hand or third-hand vehicles, which often pollute more, as we all know. And thirdly, preserving the competitiveness of our automotive industry, and when I speak about automotive industry, I don’t only mean large manufacturers, I mean the entire ecosystem, including component manufacturers and aftermarket services.
And we also need to take into account the broader transformation of the automotive industry. In fact, this Parliament has established earlier this year a very clear pathway to zero-emission vehicles. Back in November 2022, the Commission’s proposal aimed to strike the right balance between these challenging objectives. We proposed emission limits, achievable with cost-effective solutions, and technology which is already available. We proposed future-proof elements that will remain valid for electric vehicles, brakes, tyres, battery durability. We proposed using available digital technologies like sensors to improve compliance over the lifetime of a vehicle.
I recognise and welcome that the overall architecture and some key blocks of our proposal can be found in the Parliament’s position so far. First, the need to tackle exhaust emissions both from light duty- and from heavy duty vehicles. Second, the need to start regulating non-exhaust emissions and to do so based on the work carried out at UN level. Global harmonisation of the rules is the best way forward and Euro 7 will have a pivotal role here. And third, the need for rules on battery durability, lifetime requirements and on-board monitoring to ensure high performance over the life of a vehicle.
Having said this, there are of course areas where the Parliament’s position diverges from the Commission’s. And here timing is important, both from an environmental and an economic perspective. With ENVI’s report Euro 7 requirements will apply about three years later than in the Commission proposal. This would surely give vehicle manufacturers more lead time to adapt to changes. However, it would also give less time to recoup their investment before moving to 100% zero-emission vehicles. Postponing the application would also reduce environmental and health benefits.
Another challenging aspect is the proposed approach to secondary legislation. We are fully committed to be as fast as possible, but the Parliament’s proposal would multiply the number of secondary acts, sometimes even overlapping between delegated and implementing acts. And setting strict deadlines of only 12 months could also impede our consultation process and create legal risks. I also have some questions, or at least doubts, concerning some of the proposed changes regarding brake emissions for hybrid electric vehicles or battery durability requirements. And finally, I am aware, of course, that the Council has taken a different position, notably regarding emission limits, but I won’t comment any further here today, as this will be discussed in the trilogues.
So to conclude, I want to stress again how encouraging it is to see this House’s commitment on this file. It is needed so that we can collectively provide regulatory certainty to companies and protection to our citizens, in particular our most vulnerable ones. So in this spirit, I look forward to the debate today and to the upcoming trilogue negotiations."};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned regarding electric vehicles:

1. The European Parliament has established a pathway to zero-emission vehicles.
2. The Commission's proposal aimed to strike a balance between reducing emissions from cars, vans, buses, and trucks, making clean vehicles affordable for citizens, and preserving the competitiveness of the automotive industry.
3. The proposal included future-proof elements that will remain valid for electric vehicles, such as brakes, tyres, battery durability, and using available digital technologies like sensors to improve compliance over the lifetime of a vehicle.
4. The Parliament's position diverges from the Commission's on some points, including the timing of Euro 7 requirements, which would apply about three years later than in the Commission proposal, giving vehicle manufacturers more lead time but also reducing environmental and health benefits.
5. There are questions or doubts concerning proposed changes regarding brake emissions for hybrid electric vehicles or battery durability requirements.

Overall, the text highlights the importance of promoting electric vehicles as a key aspect of reducing emissions and improving air quality, while also acknowledging the need to balance this goal with other considerations such as preserving the competitiveness of the automotive industry."};0;0;1;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;
"2023-11-08_18-8";"Bas Eickhout";"Greens/EFA";"on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group. – Mr President, sometimes you have the feeling that the Euro 7 debate was more about the car industry than it is about air quality, although this proposal is there to improve air quality – mainly in our cities, where road transport is still one of the biggest polluters in Europe, and where 70 000 people die prematurely because of bad air quality, because of road transport. That’s what we’re trying to address here.
People are saying, of course, ‘we are trying here, we are moving to electric vehicles and that’s why we don’t need to do this.’ Well, the last standards that we are looking at now, Euro 6, they were formed in 2009, fifteen years ago, and the standards put in place in 2009 already could be met by technologies existing in 2009.
What we are doing now is basically reinstalling Euro 6 standards and calling it Euro 7, but are not delivering any improvement on air quality, and at the same time claiming that our citizens will be improving. Is it needed when we are moving to electric? Well, be aware that any combustion engine that is still being sold until 2035 for cars will be on European roads until 2050. For trucks, we don’t even propose the end of the combustion engine, so they will be running on our streets even longer.
Is it impossible? Even the Commission’s medium scenario showed the best cost-benefit ratio. The Commission already lowered their proposal, lowered the ambition in that proposal. We even further lower it. So anyone is saying that this is impossible to meet should read the impact assessment. Certainly the conservatives, who always love impact assessments.
I think I have a final question to the Commission. If this is being adopted and indeed it is Euro 6, can you please hurry up the negotiations on the green claims, because this will be the best example of a greenwashing label."};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned related to electric vehicles:

1. The speaker mentions that some people say ""we are trying here, we are moving to electric vehicles and that's why we don't need to do this"" (implying that the transition to electric vehicles is a sufficient solution for air quality issues).
2. The speaker notes that even if electric vehicles become more widespread, combustion engines will still be sold until 2035 for cars and possibly longer for trucks.
3. There is no further information provided about electric vehicles beyond these two points.

In summary, the speech mentions the transition to electric vehicles as a potential solution for air quality issues, but also notes that it may not be sufficient to eliminate all combustion engines from European roads in the near future."};0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2023-11-08_18-15";"Marie Dauchy";"ID";"Mr. President, dear colleagues, standards, always standards! The European Union has only one thing to say on this subject. Establishing more and more standards to ruin the lives of our fellow citizens. You want to pass a new standard on automobile pollution, the famous Euro 7. But it is important that everyone understands the vice hidden behind this text.
The European Union recently imposed the switch to all-electric vehicles, making us believe that it was a miracle solution to save the planet. Once again, it is the citizens who will have to pay the bill. What do you propose for people living outside large cities, who do not have public transport and who have no other choice but to take their car to go to work? Nothing, absolutely nothing. Worse, you underestimate them, as you make foolish decisions that will greatly affect their lives.
Once again, these decisions are made by Brussels technocrats locked in their ivory tower who do not know the realities that our fellow citizens live in. Behind your so-called environmental protection objectives hides a desire to put an end to our freedoms, starting with the freedom to move. But remember that in a democracy, it is the people who decide and you will soon pay the political price of this misunderstanding by the people. And long live June 9th."};"According to the speech, the European Union has recently imposed a switch to all-electric vehicles, which is presented as a ""miracle solution"" to save the planet. However, it is claimed that this decision will ultimately burden citizens with additional costs and inconvenience.

Specifically, the speaker argues that people living outside large cities who do not have access to public transportation and are forced to use their cars for daily commutes will be negatively impacted by this switch. The speaker implies that these individuals will have no alternative but to adapt to electric vehicles, without any consideration being given to their needs or circumstances.

Overall, the tone of the speech is critical of the EU's decision to promote all-electric vehicles and suggests that it is a misguided attempt to impose a solution on citizens without considering the practical implications."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;
"2023-11-09_2-18";"Francisco José Millán Mon";"EPP";"Mr. President, I celebrate that the summit with the United States finally took place. I hope that the next one will not wait another two years. We must return to the annual system of summits, which was already in place during Clinton's time.

The challenges we share with the United States are many: Ukraine, the Middle East, the complex relationship with China, instability in the Sahel, the Indo-Pacific, etc. Cooperation and coordination with the United States - our most important ally - are therefore essential.

In bilateral terms, unfortunately, the results of the summit are not remarkable. The agreement on fundamental minerals has still not been closed, which is necessary to avoid the problems that the US Inflation Reduction Act generates for European electric vehicles. The European Council had to insist on this point a few days ago. It is truly regrettable - and I reiterate - that we have not concluded the ATCI: now we would not be in this situation.

And we must find a solution soon to the problems of steel and aluminum. We cannot waste much time: in less than a year, we may have an administration in Washington that is indifferent or less committed to the European Union.

Finally, I celebrate the increase in funding for Erasmus+ and Fulbright Schuman programs."};"According to the speech, the ""US Inflation Reduction Act"" generates problems for European electric vehicles. This implies that the act has some provisions or incentives that benefit American electric vehicles but not European ones, creating an imbalance.

In other words, the US Inflation Reduction Act is affecting the competitiveness of European electric vehicles in comparison to their American counterparts. The speaker seems to be expressing disappointment and regret that this issue was not resolved during the summit with the United States, specifically mentioning that the European Council had to insist on this point a few days ago.

That's the entirety of what is said about electric vehicles in the text."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;
"2023-11-09_2-25";"Věra Jourová";"NA";" Vice-President of the Commission. – Mr President, honourable Members of the European Parliament, this debate confirmed that we understand the thing in the same way, the Parliament and the Commission: that it is imperative to recognise that the stability and prosperity of both sides of the Atlantic, and indeed beyond, depend on our ability to work closely and collaboratively with the United States. So, no dependency – I have to reject this, because I heard it here today – no dependency of the EU on the US. We are partners who have to work together. I think also the summit showed that this is the case.
We believe that the strength of our transatlantic partnership remains a deterrent to any who would seek to exploit weaknesses within it. The European Union and the United States share a profound and strategic relationship rooted in history, values and interests. We are firmly committed to nurturing and building upon this partnership beyond the upcoming 2024 election cycle.
Several of you asked about the concrete projects – Mr Tudorache, and several other honourable Members. So, I will go through the list of the concrete things we work on together.
First of all, many Members mentioned the slow progress, if any, on the agreement on steel and aluminium and critical materials. So, here I want to say that the summit resulted in important progress towards a global arrangement on sustainable steel and aluminium, and also Critical Minerals Agreement.
On GSA, the aluminium and steel, we made headway in identifying the sources of non-market excess capacity, and getting a better shared understanding of the tools we will need to decarbonise the steel and aluminium industries.
We are committed to continue making progress on the agreement in the next two months, including with a view to foster undistorted transatlantic trade in these sectors. So, once again, we have given ourselves an additional two more months to solve this. This is our objective and we continue to share a joint sense of urgency with you.
On the critical materials, we also advanced significantly. We will continue to engage with the United States, and also consult with our Member States, with a view to getting an agreement over the finishing line. Our objective is a full international agreement, which will allow EU critical materials to benefit from subsidies for electric vehicles under the Inflation Reduction Act, and help integrate transatlantic critical material, critical mineral, and battery supply chains. So, this is the update on these two agreements.
Now, back to the Technology and Trade Council, its technological part. One last comment on the Inflation Reduction Act. Ms Piñero, we recently adopted a communication as a reaction on the Inflation Reduction Act, the update of the response of the EU, and there is very relevant data being used for the communication.
I also want to mention, under the list of projects, the Clean Energy Incentives Dialogue, which is also connected with the Inflation Reduction Act, as you know. On the technology side, we have several priorities, which we confirmed, we will discuss them further still this year on the next session. Then we should have the last one under this administration – and it should be in spring – to wrap up, summarise the results of common efforts and discuss the possible future continuation. But, of course, the elections are coming, and so we have to work together till spring, and then to plan with some level of uncertainty.
At the same time, I want to mention four priorities under the technology side of TTC. First is the stabilisation of cooperation in the field of semiconductors, including supply chains. When I say stabilisation, I mean not ad hoc reactions on some shortages or some unexpected situations, but something more systematic, something more predictable, where we can rely on each other.
The second thing is cooperation on quantum and related technologies, especially common research, usage of Horizon-relevant programmes on the US side. The same or similar way ahead of us is for AI. Again, strong cooperation in the research field. As you may know, recently, Gina Raimondo announced the establishment of the institute on generative AI safety. She announced it in London. After we finalise the AI Act, we will also be able to announce a similar arrangement on the European Union side. Cooperation in research field is more than needed in the field of AI and generative AI, foundation models, and so on.
Also, we are continuing consultations when it comes to regulatory response on possible risks posed by artificial intelligence. Convergence of rules and common work on future global rules is a very important project still ahead of us. I am sure that if the democratic world joins forces and becomes the rules makers for the technologies, rather than rules takers, we will win a very important global battle, because the field of technologies is unfortunately, in the current world, a battlefield.
The third thing – or the last priority we have, under TTC technology part – is intensive cooperation and common projects to promote digitalisation and development of technologies and innovations in third countries. Plenty of work, a lot has been done, some things are still ahead of us, but I believe that by spring 2024, we will be able to announce very concrete results stemming from our mutual cooperation with the United States."};"According to the speech, there is one mention related to electric vehicles:

""...and help integrate transatlantic critical material, critical mineral, and battery supply chains... EU critical materials to benefit from subsidies for electric vehicles under the Inflation Reduction Act...""

This sentence indicates that the European Union (EU) wants to reach an agreement on critical materials, which would allow EU critical materials to benefit from subsidies for electric vehicles under the US's Inflation Reduction Act."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;1;0;0;0;
"2023-11-21_3-3";"Wopke Hoekstra";"NULL";" Member of the Commission. – Mr President, honourable Members, things actually do get interesting when a climate debate becomes concrete, and trucks and buses and the need to make them zero emission, that is actually very tangible for our citizens. 
Of course, at the same time, we are discussing this challenge in a climate emergency and that asks for responsibility in all of our choices. Climate change is unfortunately happening much faster than we feared, and it is causing damage all across Europe, and also all across all the corners of the world. And we have a new sad record, with 2023 as the warmest year on record as was the same, by the way, for 2022. 
Of course, we discuss climate files like this one with the binding goals of our European climate law in mind. We all know the targets: we must cut greenhouse gas emissions by 55% by 2030, and we need to reach climate neutrality by 2050. And I’m going to say it again, it is this Parliament that has championed these targets for all the right reasons. 
To reach those targets, and the rapporteur just said it, all sectors must do their share and transport is not and cannot be an exception. In fact, transport requires special attention because it is responsible for almost one quarter of European CO2 emissions. And interestingly enough, for a long time it was the only sector where emissions were rising. So we must move to zero emission transport on our highways and in our cities. There simply is no other way forward. 
But I would also like to highlight the other side of the coin: the opportunity that the shift to zero emission transport actually brings. European truck makers and bus makers can be global leaders if we set the right framework for them to invest in what I think are the technologies of the future. In a competition for electric mobility with China, for example, stagnation is not and cannot be the answer – the ramping up of key technologies in Europe is. 
So ramping up the supply of European electric trucks and buses cuts our dependence on fossil fuels from volatile countries. Climate policy is, you could say, security policy. And zero emission mobility can be affordable mobility, if more zero emission trucks and bus models come to the market, then simply the prices will go down. 
In order to reap these opportunities, we must give European industry the one thing that it wants from us as politicians, and that is clarity. Because that means investment certainty and it means stability. If companies then embark on the clean mobility journey, they need a dot on the horizon to the journey towards. 
I am glad that the EP report confirms the ambition of the Commission on many issues, but I would like to address one specific issue that has become part of this debate. I very much understand the desire – and it is a desire across this House – to find a way that a move to zero emission transport. We do it in a way that is workable for our companies and our citizens. That is also what I want to do, because we have to take our people and our businesses along, and I do want to help in finding the way. And yet, in all openness, I do not think that to include a so-called carbon correction factor in our rules is the right way forward. 
Then the idea would be to give truck makers a compliance bonus for making new trucks if Member States ensure the supply of, for example, e-fuels. Again, of course, I fully see the importance of innovative fuels, but we need them for the existing fleet before customers can switch to new zero-emission vehicles under this law. And mostly we need them for hard-to-abate sectors like maritime and aviation. That is where we need these type of fuels. I doubt that a carbon correction factor for new trucks gets us broad support for zero-emission transport. That was said before – maybe with even more passion than I am doing it – that virtually all truck makers, and all truck makers I have been talking, to say that they do not favour this approach. They would face penalties if Member States fall behind in existing renewable energy targets on fuels, and there is no incentive to overachieve on those targets. And generally we should be careful not to create artificial markets for new fuels in road transport. 
Ladies and gentlemen, our proposal, especially on the 2040 target, is enough for all likely fuel developments. The Commission can reflect on market developments in a spirit of technological openness. We can do this in the review of this law in 2027, and I hope that Members of Parliament can take this into account in their votes later today. 
Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, the shift to zero emission trucks goes at the heart of the industrial transformation that we have ahead of us. Zero-emission buses change the daily lives of citizens taking public transport in cities, but, of course, also in the countryside. It generates passions. That is normal. So let us have a proper debate on all the various aspects going forward. And finally, let me once again thank the rapporteur, his team, for all his good and hard work. "};"The speech mentions electric vehicles (EVs) several times. Here's a summary of what is said:

* The speaker emphasizes the importance of transitioning to zero-emission transport, including trucks and buses, as it is responsible for almost one quarter of European CO2 emissions.
* They highlight that Europe can be a global leader in electric mobility if the right framework is set up for companies to invest in EV technologies.
* The speaker notes that ramping up the supply of European electric trucks and buses can cut dependence on fossil fuels from volatile countries, making climate policy also security policy.
* They mention that zero-emission mobility can be affordable mobility, as more models come to the market, prices will go down.
* However, the speaker expresses concerns about a proposed ""carbon correction factor"" in the rules, which would give truck makers a compliance bonus for producing new trucks if Member States ensure the supply of e-fuels. They argue that this approach is not the right way forward and may create artificial markets for new fuels.

Overall, the speech emphasizes the importance of transitioning to electric vehicles as part of Europe's climate policy and highlights the potential benefits of doing so, including reduced dependence on fossil fuels and more affordable mobility options."};0;1;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;1;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;
"2023-11-21_3-8";"Pietro Fiocchi";"ECR";"on behalf of the ECR Group. – Mr President, we are all in agreement with our good friend Bas Eickhout – but he's not listening – regarding the need to reduce CO2 emissions on the heavy vehicles. But our approach is a pragmatic one, meaning that before we have very ambitious goals and then we do not reach them, we prefer to have very pragmatic goals that we make sure that all the Member States we reach.
There are three points in which the ECR Group will be fighting on. Number one is the carbon correction factor, which we think is necessary to handle the wide variety of heavy vehicles. Number two is the urban buses. We ran a study in Italy and in most of the largest cities, we reach the goal that is proposed in the text, but most of the smaller cities will not make it because of a whole bunch of different problems, especially on the recharging stations and so on.  And last, neutral fuels. We know Germany – and we hear Peter Liese – they are very strong on synthetic fuels. Italy is very strong on biomasses. We do believe that we need to accept all the different type of less impacting fuels."};"There is no mention of electric vehicles in the provided speech. The speaker mentions ""recharging stations"" in the context of urban buses, but this refers to charging infrastructure for buses, not electric vehicles specifically.

The speech does discuss heavy vehicles, carbon correction factors, urban buses, and neutral fuels (including synthetic fuels and biomasses), but it does not mention electric vehicles at all."};0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2023-11-21_3-18";"Kateřina Konečná";"The Left";"- Mr. President, it is something just over two weeks since we voted on a new emissions standard for Euro 7, which eventually passed through Parliament in a somewhat relaxed form. And now we are voting on another emissions standard, this time for new heavy vehicles, and the report that came from the Committee on the Environment, Public Health, and Food Safety is even more devastating than the original Commission proposal.

Not only do stricter emissions standards eliminate industry, but some colleagues seem to have overlooked in their green obsession that we can harm the environment by approving this report. The requirement for city buses to be fully zero-emission from 2030 could really worsen accessibility and quality of public transport, as European cities are not at all prepared for charging infrastructure. If we truly care about the environment, we must make mass transportation more attractive and not vilify it. People need to find some way to get to work or school and back home. I hope that reason will prevail, and this liquidation policy will be rejected."};"According to the speech, the following point related to electric vehicles is mentioned:

* The requirement for city buses to be fully zero-emission from 2030 could worsen accessibility and quality of public transport because European cities are not at all prepared for charging infrastructure.

In other words, the speaker is expressing concern that the push towards electric buses (zero-emission) might not be feasible due to the lack of adequate charging infrastructure in many European cities."};0;1;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2023-11-21_3-19";"Henna Virkkunen";"PPE";"Dear Speaker, Commissioner, it is extremely important to reduce emissions in the transport sector. We know that this is the only sector where emissions have continued to increase and heavy trucks, congested traffic, account for 25% of EU road transport emissions. Therefore, it is justified to pay attention to this.

However, it is also important that when we set these targets, we take into account the different circumstances in Europe. I represent here the Finns. You know that in Finland there are very long distances, sparse settlement and a cold climate. It is by no means realistic or even cost-effective to think that we would quickly switch to electric cars in these conditions. The circumstances are entirely different in urban, public transport and bus traffic, where electrification can be very easily achieved.

Due to the specific circumstances in Finland, we use exceptionally heavy, large trucks and this is a cost-effective way for us to reduce emissions, as we can produce less CO2 per tonne of cargo on a large truck than if we had two or three smaller trucks transporting the same load. Therefore, it is important that regional differences are taken into account when setting these targets. Our goal now is that 90% of new heavy-duty vehicles with a lot of emissions in road traffic would be completely emission-free by 2040.

It is important that we now limit the largest companies, but at the same time, we must also increase neutral technology, take into account biodegradation, renewable fuels and promote an ecosystem-based approach to calculation. I myself support the idea of ​​also adding the Carbon Correction Factor, the carbon correction coefficient, which allows us to bring this technological neutrality to a broader scope."};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned related to electric vehicles:

1. The speaker mentions that electrification can be easily achieved in urban, public transport, and bus traffic.
2. However, they also mention that it is not realistic or cost-effective for Finland to quickly switch to electric cars due to its specific circumstances (long distances, sparse settlement, and cold climate).
3. No further details about electric vehicles are mentioned in the speech.

In summary, the speaker acknowledges the potential of electric vehicles in certain contexts but highlights the challenges and limitations of implementing them in Finland's unique environment."};0;0;0;0;1;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;
"2023-12-12_2-3";"Anna-Michelle Asimakopoulou";"NULL";"""Statement of the Committee on International Trade of the European Parliament. - Mr. President, China announced some restrictions on French exports in July. China produces 80% of global French fries. For many critical raw materials, such as rare earths and magnesium, China supplies almost 100% of the needs of the European Union.

Critical raw materials are of vital importance for the implementation of the green and digital transition. They are essential for the production of batteries, electric vehicles, wind turbines, and mobile phones. The issue of critical raw materials will help us ensure sufficient supplies and limit the risk of dependence on a single supplier.

The production of more critical raw materials within the European Union is part of the solution. Greece has the ability to produce enough French fries to cover the needs of the European Union. Today, the European Parliament sends a clear message that the European Union is ready to address supply chain disruptions in critical raw materials. The issue of critical raw materials must now be supported by new sources of funding."""};"According to the speech, electric vehicles are mentioned as one of the products that require critical raw materials for their production. The specific mention is:

""...they are essential for the production of batteries, electric vehicles, wind turbines, and mobile phones.""

This sentence indicates that electric vehicles rely on critical raw materials, which are rare earths and magnesium, among others, to be produced."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;
"2023-12-12_2-11";"Henrike Hahn";"Verts/ALE";"On behalf of the Verts/ALE Fraction. - Mr. President! The Green Deal needs critical raw materials, and Europe has delivered – at the speed of sound, for diversified supply chains and delivery reliability, for industry and small businesses in Europe. Lithium and rare earths are used for green technologies in wind turbines, solar panels, electric cars, and computer chips.
With the EU Law on Critical Raw Materials, we have now, in record time, set a green industrial policy milestone for more mining in Europe. The circular economy and recycling are now at the center of the raw materials law, while we work simultaneously on reducing the demand for critical raw materials and substitution. With the raw materials law, green technologies made in Europe now have the opportunity to be produced more strategically autonomous and reliable without having to rely on raw material deliveries from geopolitically questionable countries such as Russia and China. We are building a European raw materials sector, turning waste into a resource, and strengthening global partnerships and thus green, competitive industry without disappearing into the bureaucratic jungle.
The recycling benchmark in the raw materials law is now raised to 25% of the EU annual consumption of strategic raw materials. An increasing amount of strategic raw materials in EU waste streams will be recycled. That's obviously a good boost for the recycling industry.
It is also very important for us Greens: Civil society must be optimally involved in mining in Europe. The explicit mention of free consent after prior information for indigenous peoples was slowed down due to Council objections. And yet: The final text refers to the OECD guidelines, which contain free consent after prior information, and that is important and correct. The final text also includes a consideration against deep-sea mining, and that is also important to us. Mining in EU areas must remain taboo. The protective measures provided for in the mandate of the European Parliament were ultimately not retained, and that is clear to us Greens painful.
However, the result must also be said: The raw materials law expressly amends none of the provisions of the Environmental Protection Framework Directive. It is clear: A green transformation to achieve our climate goals needs critical raw materials, and therefore we need demand-oriented mining in Europe under the highest possible ecological and social criteria. Onwards!"};"According to the speech, lithium and rare earths are used for green technologies such as:

* Electric cars

This is mentioned in the first paragraph of the speech, which states: ""Lithium and rare earths are used for green technologies in wind turbines, solar panels, electric cars, and computer chips."""};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;1;
"2023-12-12_2-17";"Jens Geier";"S-D";"""Mr. President, esteemed Mr. Commissioner Breton, dear colleagues! Wind turbines, electric cars, mobile phones, computers, space travel - for most products of the future, European production is dependent on raw materials that must be imported. Because we will probably not continue to see the successes we had at the beginning of the year when rare earth deposits were discovered in Sweden, the largest European discovery so far. Prospecting must therefore continue. That's why it's good that the approval periods have been shortened, but mining is of course not sustainable, nothing grows back.
I am happy as a Social Democrat to see high occupational health and safety and environmental standards set in this area. But recycling is sustainable. The goal must be for 25% of European demand to be met in this way. I am happy to come from a region in Germany, North Rhine-Westphalia, where this has already been very exemplary technologically and from the company's point of view.
Research into substitute products must also be possible. Wouldn't it be great to replace lithium with sodium? All of this can reduce European dependence. The more independent Europe becomes, the more we curb the power of dictators, autocrats, and warlords, and that would be good news for the world."""};"According to the speech, electric cars are mentioned as one of the products of the future that European production depends on raw materials imported from outside Europe. The speaker notes that this dependence is not sustainable and suggests that recycling and research into substitute products could help reduce European dependence on these imports.

Specifically, the speaker mentions that it would be great to replace lithium (a key component in electric vehicle batteries) with sodium, implying that finding alternative sources of materials for electric vehicles could be beneficial."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;1;
"2023-12-12_2-19";"Sara Matthieu";"Verts/ALE";"Chairman, colleagues, commissioner, the demand for critical raw materials for our wind turbines, for our electric cars is exploding. We obviously need those materials for the transition to renewable energy.
It's good that Europe is waking up. But let's absolutely avoid a new raw materials race and be smarter about it.
What should we do? We must focus on the reuse of our raw materials with binding targets for recycling. We must choose bicycles, public transport, and electric partial vehicles.
For the first time in this text, we are also introducing explicit measures to limit the growing demand for raw materials. So we obviously need less energy and fewer raw materials, and I think the potential gains there are really enormous. Because we reduce our dependence on dubious regimes, we create more local jobs in the circular industry, our stuff lasts longer, and our wallet benefits from that too. That's good for our planet, that's good for our economy, and that's good for us."};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned related to electric vehicles:

1. The demand for raw materials for electric cars is exploding.
2. Electric partial vehicles (not fully electric) are suggested as an alternative transportation option.

That's all the information about electric vehicles mentioned in the text."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;1;
"2023-12-12_2-20";"Johan Nissinen";"ECR";"""Mr. Chairman! Today there is a Chinese monopoly on critical raw materials needed for electric cars, wind power, and solar panels. Just as the EU previously became dependent on Russian gas, we are now becoming dependent on China. One simply switches one dictatorship for another. Those who believe that the prices of renewable sources will decrease forget that China can easily raise prices in its geopolitical game when it wants to. To think that they won't use raw materials for a political power play is just naive.
We must do everything possible to reduce this dependence. It is therefore absolutely necessary that we open up new Swedish mines. Unfortunately, it will not be enough: No matter how many mines we open, we will not get rid of the dependency. The phasing out of nuclear power and the utopian dream of 100% renewable energy give China an open target. Mistakes have already been made, something we will have to pay for in the future."""};"According to the speech, there is a Chinese monopoly on critical raw materials needed for electric cars. This means that China has a significant control over the supply of these materials, which are essential for the production of electric vehicles. The speaker expresses concern about this situation, stating that it is similar to the EU's previous dependence on Russian gas and that switching from one dictatorship (Russia) to another (China) is not a solution.

The speech does not provide further information about electric vehicles beyond mentioning their reliance on these critical raw materials."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;
"2023-12-12_2-22";"Malin Björk";"The Left";"""Mr. President! We will most likely see more open-pit mining in the EU in the near future. We need minerals and metals for our electric cars, wind turbines, and solar panels.
That is why it is so important that this mining takes place in a way that is both ecological and socially sustainable. We must extract metals in a way that respects the environment. We must do it in a way that respects indigenous peoples' rights. We must do it in a way that minimizes the depletion of the earth as much as possible.
I have worked hard to ensure that this legislation we will vote on today takes into account all of this, that there are proper environmental reviews, that we respect indigenous peoples' rights - not least the Sami people in Sweden and Finland - and that we also take the necessary steps now to reduce our dependence on these minerals, just as we must reduce our dependence on energy. We must dare to take those steps and have that debate at the same time as we make decisions about new mines.
Unfortunately, my own Swedish government has obstructed environmental reviews and indigenous peoples' rights. They have undermined the work of parliament. It is completely clear to us that this legislation, as it stands today, does not meet the requirements we should be able to demand and what we expect from such an important piece of legislation."""};"According to the speech, electric vehicles are mentioned as one of the areas where minerals and metals are needed. The speaker states that ""we need minerals and metals for our electric cars"" alongside wind turbines and solar panels. This implies that electric vehicles require certain materials or resources to function, which is why it's important to extract these minerals in a sustainable way."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2023-12-12_2-30";"Miguel Urbán Crespo";"The Left";"""Mr. President, the truth is that we are attending a global race for control of resources in an ecological emergency context. The material foundations of the green transition are disputed, generating a genuine worldwide extractivist fever. While the European Union fills its mouth with its Green Pact, electric cars in Europe require increasing mining pressure in the global south and also here, in Europe. Materials that are not only for a green transition but also to fuel the European arms race. A genuine blood-stained green capitalism because extractive pressure not only strips resources and contaminates territories, but also represses and expels those who inhabit and defend them. Although there are more and more examples of resistance facing this extractivist fever, such as Ecuador's Anti-Mining Front, which we salute from here. The solution is not a new extractive and neocolonial wave, but to consume less and distribute better. Green capitalism is barren in the face of the climatic and ecological urgency we are experiencing."""};"According to the speech, electric cars in Europe require increasing mining pressure in both the global south and Europe itself. This implies that the production of electric vehicles relies on the extraction of materials from these regions, which is linked to the broader issue of extractivism and its environmental and social impacts.

In other words, the text suggests that the growth of electric vehicles in Europe is not a sustainable or environmentally friendly solution, as it perpetuates the exploitation of natural resources and contributes to ecological degradation."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;
"2023-12-12_2-38";"Geert Bourgeois";"ECR";"Chairman, we fully support this regulation on critical raw materials. It is more than sufficient to achieve the green and digital transition, to strengthen the competitiveness of our companies, to be less dependent on the rest of the world - especially China - and thus to reinforce our open strategic autonomy.
We live in a period of deglobalization. Already, the tense trade relationship between the United States and China is leading to a restriction of the export of critical minerals from China, which has a dominant position.
Therefore, we fully support the Critical Raw Materials Club and we call for more trade agreements to include a chapter on mineral resources and especially in the short term an agreement with the United States on the critical raw materials needed for the production of batteries for electric cars. My congratulations to the rapporteur."};"According to the speech, it is mentioned that:

* The production of batteries for electric cars requires critical raw materials.
* An agreement with the United States on these critical raw materials is being called for, specifically in the short term.

That's all the information about electric vehicles mentioned in the text."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;
"2023-12-12_2-44";"Susana Solís Pérez";"Renew";"""Mr. President, Mr. Commissioner, without lithium, there are no batteries, and without rare earths, there are neither wind turbines nor electric cars. China controls 98% of these rare earths, using them as a geopolitical weapon like Russia with gas. Without a secure supply, there is no energy transition or strategic autonomy in Europe. That's why the law we have processed in record time is very welcome. We need more alliances with reliable partners like Chile. It is also important to accelerate the granting of permits and map out strategic reserves in Europe. But that is not enough.
In Spain, we have lithium and rare earths, but, as in other parts of Europe, these projects cannot be developed due to social opposition. It's not enough to ensure the highest environmental and sustainability guarantees. We also need to involve local communities in these strategic projects and not just extract resources from them, but leave their territory with added value and quality jobs.
Also, as we have claimed in this Parliament, we need more efforts in the recovery and recycling of waste from these raw materials."""};"According to the speech, it is mentioned that ""without rare earths, there are neither wind turbines nor electric cars"". This implies that rare earths are a crucial component for the production of both wind turbines and electric vehicles. There is no further mention of electric vehicles beyond this statement."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;
"2023-12-12_2-46";"Adam Bielan";"ECR";" – Mr President, dear Commissioner, today we address the Critical Raw Materials Act, a vital initiative for Europe’s industry and economic prosperity. Our innovation-led continent has up to now been overly reliant on external sources for materials essential to technologies like chips, electric vehicle batteries or renewable energy systems. I believe this Act will create a new dynamic, reducing our dependency on imports that pose risks to our economic security, and increasing European ambitions, especially in the digital sphere. 
From the internal market perspective, I welcome the new provisions regarding large companies that will now assess risks in their supply of key raw materials, aiming to prevent any disruptions in supply chains that could affect consumers. I am confident that by making rules clearer for companies and reducing existing burdens, we can significantly boost business growth, particularly in sectors crucial to our technological and economic development."};"According to the speech, electric vehicle batteries are mentioned as one of the technologies that Europe has been reliant on external sources for raw materials. The speaker believes that the Critical Raw Materials Act will help reduce this dependency by creating a new dynamic and increasing European ambitions.

In summary, the text mentions electric vehicles in the context of highlighting the importance of securing raw materials for key technologies, including electric vehicle batteries, to ensure economic security and promote innovation in Europe."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;
"2023-12-12_2-60";"Maria Grapini";"S-D";"""Mr. President, Mr. Commissioner, esteemed colleagues, I do not believe that anyone can contest the need to have critical raw materials in the European Union space, to produce, to no longer depend on third countries, to have critical raw materials for key sectors: agriculture, health, construction, and even for defense. Mr. Commissioner, alongside increasing demand for raw materials, there is a problem with specialists. We have a shortage of specialists, by 2030, just in the field of electromobility, 1,200,000.

We must invest here, make the specialty related to critical raw materials attractive. There is still a need for urgent action so that this value chain can be created here, in the European Union. This regulation will certainly help and the reindustrialization strategy I launched long ago. We need to improve recycling and yes, let's no longer have direct or indirect dependence on third countries.

We should not criticize the third countries that produce - let's do it ourselves, and it is good that the proposal has been made to set up this European Committee on Critical Materials, but it is not enough. It is important for it to function, and I would have liked for the European Parliament not to be an observer, but to be a member of this committee. I appreciate that there is a subgroup that focuses on the involvement of SMEs, but Mr. Commissioner, let's not let it happen as with the directive on public procurement, for the SMEs to only be theoretically involved. Here we need to act in support of SMEs."""};"According to the speech, there is a problem with specialists related to electromobility. By 2030, it is expected that there will be a shortage of 1,200,000 specialists in this field.

That's the only mention of electric vehicles (or electromobility) in the text."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;1;0;0;0;1;
"2023-12-12_13-37";"Silvia Sardone";"ID";"""- Madam President, honorable colleagues, you want to protect the democracy of the European Union from foreign influences, but you are the first to be suckled by various world dictatorships.
For example, by supporting China, an exemplary dictatorship and communist regime. On what? On electric cars and batteries, guaranteeing them a shameful monopoly that will asphalt the entire European automotive industry. What sense is there in talking about democracy if you then allow China to buy us piece by piece, without ever saying anything about the systematic violations of human rights and workers' rights?
And what about Iran? You talk so much about women's rights and yet you are the first to promote the Islamic veil in Commission communications as something positive.
You want to be bastions of freedom and democracy, and then it turns out that, for years, community funds have been used to finance Islamist realities and those close to terrorism.
In short, beyond the proclamations, a little consistency would also be useful."""};"According to the speech, the European Union is supporting China's electric cars and batteries, which will give China a ""shameful monopoly"" that will harm the entire European automotive industry. This is mentioned as an example of how the EU is being influenced by foreign powers, specifically dictatorships like China, without addressing human rights violations and workers' rights issues."};0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2023-12-12_17-12";"Raphaël Glucksmann";"S-D";"""Mr. President, Mr. Vice President, dear colleagues, in May, the first Chinese commercial airliner, the C919, made its first flight thanks to European technologies. We are all too familiar with this scenario: the Chinese regime decides to dominate a global market, so it creates a public company for that purpose, in this case Comac. This company then turns to our companies, providing them with our technology, and no one worries about anything. After two decades, Comac will have pushed Europeans out of the Chinese aviation market before setting its sights on the European market, even threatening Airbus.
It is Safran, the French company, that provides the C919's engine. Safran also, in partnership with Comac, develops the aircraft's electrical circuit, transferring its technology to China's military aircraft in the process. It's always the same story of greed and stupidity, from electric cars to nuclear power, from solar panels to all strategic sectors. It's always the same choice between short-term profit and long-term European interest.
It is time to change this scenario that leads us to decline, dependence, and vassalage. That is why this economic security strategy is so important. It must create a turning point that will benefit all of Europe."""};"According to the speech, something related to electric vehicles is mentioned as part of a broader pattern of technology transfer from European companies to Chinese companies. The speaker states:

""...from electric cars to nuclear power, from solar panels to all strategic sectors.""

This sentence implies that there has been a trend of European companies providing their technology to Chinese companies in various industries, including electric vehicles, without considering the long-term consequences for Europe's interests."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;
"2023-12-12_20-8";"Marie-Pierre Vedrenne";"Renew";"On behalf of Renew Group. - Mr. President, we can no longer remain idle in the face of Russia's sanctions bypassing and repeated human rights violations in Xinjiang. We can no longer accept the disloyal competition of a Chinese market closed to European companies. We can no longer allow this systemic rival to have a stranglehold on our strategic infrastructure.

As you said, Mr. High Representative, the summit between China and the European Union could have been a framework for constructive discussions, with concrete actions. Instead, its failure highlights the urgent need to rethink our openness. The ongoing investigation into electric cars is a good thing, but it should not be the last.

Despite the fact that neither summits nor dialogues work, the European Union must continue to provide itself with the means, thanks to an effective and ambitious economic security strategy, among other things. It is only united Europeans that we will achieve our goals. It is only united Europeans that we will protect our industries and ensure a fair trade game with transparent and respected rules."};"According to the speech, an ""ongoing investigation into electric cars"" is mentioned as a good thing, but it should not be the last. This implies that there is currently an investigation or inquiry related to electric vehicles, and the speaker believes that this is a positive development, but more needs to be done in this area.

That's the extent of what is said about electric vehicles in the text. There are no further details or specifics provided regarding the investigation or its purpose."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2023-12-12_20-20";"Isabella Tovaglieri";"ID";"""Mr. President, Mr. High Representative, honorable colleagues, China is a threat to Europe, we must say it clearly. As the COVID-19 pandemic has shown us, this country is not a reliable and transparent partner but, on the contrary, an enemy willing to cause a global disaster in order to protect its interests.
Now history is repeating itself with the green transition: China holds us hostage with batteries, microchips, and rare earths, while simultaneously flooding our market with low-cost electric cars, thanks in part to the subsidies of the communist dictatorship's state aid.
Italy has just abandoned the Silk Road memorandum, distancing itself from the Chinese regime, and it is now time for Europe to act if it does not want to succumb.
In recent days, after its first and only mission to Beijing, the European Commission has denounced the heavy imbalances in EU-China trade and has even announced an investigation into Chinese dumping.
Well! If we had known that President von der Leyen needed a trip to Beijing to realize what the League has been loudly saying in this Parliament for five years, we would have gladly paid for this trip, but much earlier!"""};"According to the speech, China is flooding Europe's market with low-cost electric cars, thanks in part to the subsidies of the Chinese communist dictatorship's state aid. This is mentioned as one of the ways in which China is holding Europe hostage, along with batteries and rare earths."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;
"2023-12-14_3-16";"Izabela-Helena Kloc";"ECR";"""Mr. Chairman! Esteemed Members! Although we hear voices of self-satisfaction with COP28 achievements here, it is clear for all that the world outside the United States and the European Union has a completely different idea about maintaining economic growth. Drastic climate measures not only keep the Union in isolation but also impose difficult-to-accept burdens on its citizens and cause job losses. And the question: are our citizens ready to buy expensive electric cars, pay several times higher bills for heating and food? I don't think so.
Our planet is far from dying. It is people suffering from poverty who are dying. The majority of EU citizens also do not want to die for the planet. The conclusions from COP28 show that climate diplomacy is essentially a mirage of Western liberal elites. The sooner we understand this, the better for Europe. But let it be clear: renewable energy - yes, but realistically and pragmatically. For people, for their well-being and a peaceful, better life."""};"According to the speech, it is mentioned that ""expensive electric cars"" are being referred to as something that citizens may not be willing to buy. The speaker questions whether citizens are ready to pay several times higher bills for heating and food in order to own such vehicles. This is presented as a potential burden on citizens, implying that they may not be willing or able to afford the costs associated with electric cars."};0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;
"2024-01-16_2-13";"Kathleen Van Brempt";"S-D";"On behalf of the S&D-Faction - Chairman, Mr. Prime Minister. Europe is at a crossroads - which you have already referred to yourselves - and it will be up to the Belgian presidency to give this shape.
For us, it is clear: it will be about a Europe that protects, strengthens prosperity, and defends freedom, democracy, and human rights. That Europe must and will be social. That is why the debate on the revision of the budget rules, so-called economic governance, is so crucial. There can be no question of a return to a policy of saving, saving, and saving.
Mr. Botenga, you are mistaken. If there is now one member state that adheres very strictly to the position we have taken in the European Parliament since then, especially room for investment, including social investments, public services, and sustainable transition, it is Belgium. And there is a crucial task for you, Mr. Prime Minister, to bend the Council's disastrous stance towards a better stance.
My colleague Lamberts has already referred to this: in that transition, there can be no question of a pause button, Mr. Prime Minister, that was quite a slip-up. It is indeed a false choice. It is not about either nature or farmers, an ambitious climate policy, or our industry. They go hand in hand. What is important, however, is that we in Europe actually have the public funds. A kind of European investment fund to level the playing field for all member states and ensure two important things:
a genuine industrial policy that keeps industry in Europe, and
ensuring that everyone is involved in this transition, including the people who don't have the means today to renovate their homes or buy an electric car. We should indeed ensure better public transport.
Last point - very important, our responsibility: geopolitics. Ukraine. As one - or one woman - standing behind Ukraine and fulfilling our promises. Mr. Prime Minister, it will be very important to show the same courage and unity when it comes to the conflict between Israel and Hamas. And I know that the Belgian position on this issue is good. Let us ensure that an immediate ceasefire and access to much more humanitarian aid become an absolute priority of this Belgian presidency. I wish you a lot of courage and all our support."};"According to the speech, it is mentioned that ""buying an electric car"" is something that some people may not have the means to do today. This is mentioned as one of the groups that should be included in the transition to a more sustainable future, along with ensuring better public transport. The speaker suggests that a European investment fund could help level the playing field for all member states and ensure that everyone has access to these opportunities."};0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;
"2024-01-16_17-16";"Isabella Tovaglieri";"ID";"""Mr. President, honorable colleagues, we firmly and without ambiguity condemn every form of extremism, but we do not accept the devious attempt by the left to equate all center-right voters with a thin group of nostalgics from the 20-year period. On one point, however, you are right: the danger of fascism is real, and it is among us.
Indeed, I find it fascist to try to prevent an internationally renowned orchestra director from taking the stage at a theater, then insulting her from the audience simply because she is not politically aligned to the left, I find it fascist the single thought of those who, behind the shield of political correctness, condemn and repress anyone who expresses dissent, labeling them with dangerous stereotypes such as ""homophobe"", ""sexist"", ""male-centric"", ""Nazi"", and sometimes exposing them to media lynching, disregarding potential consequences. Finally, I find it fascist to force families who don't make it to the end of the month to buy a new electric car or carry out expensive building renovations they cannot afford.
The danger of fascism exists but you represent it in the most subtle way, with your coercive policies masked as noble goals.
Once upon a time, the color of fascism was black, today instead it is the green of the left-ecoterrorists."""};"According to the speech, the following point is made about electric vehicles:

""...force families who don't make it to the end of the month to buy a new electric car or carry out expensive building renovations they cannot afford.""

In other words, the speaker is criticizing a policy that requires low-income families to purchase an electric vehicle or undertake costly renovations, implying that this is an example of coercive and fascist behavior."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;
"2024-01-17_4-59";"Monika Hohlmeier";"PPE";"""Dear Mr. President, Commissioner Šefčovič, dear colleagues! First of all: rule of law, democracy, and the economy are going downhill in Hungary, and so is the social security of many people. Instead of finding solutions together with the EU partners, Viktor Orbán is playing a double game. He wants billions of European funds to be granted without any conditions whatsoever on the one hand, while at the same time discrediting the EU, its institutions, and their president.
As for the now-released funds amounting to 10.2 billion, I look in the direction of Commissioners Reynders, Schmit, Ferreira, who were leading on this decision. I tell my colleague Körner, that was exceptionally not Ursula von der Leyen - all three Social Democrats, and they are not suspected either. But I do not understand how the Commission could come to the decision that the independence of the judiciary has been restored so that the funds can be released in the Cohesion. If there is no possibility for a fair process and the government can overturn judicial decisions because it simply makes new legislation overnight that overturns every judicial ruling, then such decisions are simply window-dressing and they help Orbán to continue his autocracy and oligarchism.
I would also like to know from the Commission whether it is true what is reported in the media that, as a first act under REPowerEU and the funds made available to them, potentially the first funds could go to a Chinese electric car manufacturer, which the Commission has just accused of excessive Chinese state subsidies. I ask the Commission to clarify this matter. This is unbearable."""};"According to the speech, it is reported in the media that as part of the REPowerEU initiative and the funds made available, potentially the first funds could go to a Chinese electric car manufacturer. The speaker asks the Commission to clarify this matter.

In summary, the text mentions:

* A potential allocation of funds from REPowerEU to a Chinese electric car manufacturer
* The Commission has previously accused the same Chinese company of excessive state subsidies
* The speaker is seeking clarification on this matter"};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;
"2024-01-17_12-7";"Johan Nissinen";"ECR";"For the ECR group. - Mr. Speaker! The Left is shocked by Norway's decision to have mining in the sea. There are no problems with filling the oceans with wind power that has a negative impact on animals and nature. It is political decisions to build wind turbines everywhere and that we should have electric cars that have led to this mining. It is therefore intellectually disgusting to criticize Norway right now.
Where else will we get all the material from, those minerals we need for the green transition? Maybe from China, which pollutes even more? Let's work across party lines instead. For my party, the Sweden Democrats, nuclear power is the solution to the energy crisis. Nuclear power is actually one of the cleanest forms of energy production. Everyone who lives outside the climate bubble knows this. Nuclear power can make electricity prices cheaper, and that is what citizens need right now."};"According to the speech, it is mentioned that ""we should have electric cars"" as part of the reason why Norway has decided to mine in the sea. The speaker implies that the demand for minerals needed for electric vehicles (presumably lithium, cobalt, and other rare earth metals) has led to this decision."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;
"2024-01-17_12-8";"Jaak Madison";"ID";"on behalf of the ID Group. – Mr President, dear few colleagues in the Chamber, dear Commissioner, first of all, I’m really wondering. I’ve seen also the news from Norway, where all the Greens and liberals are protesting against the plan.
But, at the same time, the same Greens and leftists don’t have any kind of problem that we are acting as colonisers in Africa and in Congo to have those precious metals for the Green Deal. Because to drive with fancy, nice electric cars, to feel very green, to sleep in a better way, we need those metals.
Today, currently, we can get it, especially from Africa and from Asia. You don’t worry about that, that you are using child labour in Congo who are earning less than 2 dollars per day, because you need those metals.
At the same time, if there’s alternative for the seabed mining in Norway, then there’s a huge problem again. So what is the alternative? How can we make this, our Green Deal? How can we use those electric cars, if you don’t like the seabed mining? But you don’t worry at all about mining in Africa or in Congo, like in history, on the same way, not better at all.
So, that’s the problem. Of course, the only result is that we have to end up with this kind of Green Deal ideology, which is absolutely crazy, because it doesn’t make sense. Like the previous speaker told already, the only future for energy is nuclear power. That’s the only solution."};"According to the speech, electric cars are mentioned as being ""fancy"" and ""nice"", implying that they are desirable or appealing. The speaker suggests that people want to drive electric cars because it makes them feel ""very green"" and allows them to ""sleep in a better way"". This implies that electric vehicles are seen as a symbol of environmentalism or eco-friendliness.

The speech also mentions that electric cars require certain metals, which are obtained from Africa and Asia. The speaker criticizes the fact that these metals are often mined using child labor in countries like Congo, where workers earn less than $2 per day. This suggests that the production of electric vehicles has a negative impact on some communities.

Finally, the speech implies that the use of electric cars is tied to the concept of the ""Green Deal"", which is criticized as being ""absolutely crazy"" and not making sense. The speaker seems to be arguing that the pursuit of electric vehicles is part of a flawed ideology that prioritizes environmentalism over social justice or human rights."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;
"2019-07-17_15-9";"Jorge Buxadé Villalba";"ECR";" On behalf of the ECR Group. - Mr. President, we are enormously sorry that the left has brought this matter concerning Madrid Central to this chamber with the sole intention of damaging Spain's image and interests, something which is quite common among Spanish socialists and communists.
    On May 26, not only were European elections held in Spain, but also municipal elections. And the people of Madrid voted for those parties that primarily proposed the abolition of the traffic restriction system in Madrid Central.
    But there is an undeniable reality that cannot be denied, and it is that Madrid Central has been a failure: a failure for businesses, which have seen their sales reduced by more than 15%, a failure for families, who take more than two hours to get to their workplace or take their children to school, and a failure for air quality and the improvement of atmospheric pollution, because, as has been said here, air does not have borders and the levels of air pollution in Madrid Central have not improved and, nevertheless, they have been transferred to the outskirts of that same city.
    We will not accept that the left gives us a single lesson on environmental conservation or the defense of the health of Spaniards. But we will also say that the solution does not lie in prohibiting or restricting. Public transport must be improved, coal-fired boilers (more than five hundred are still in Madrid) must be suppressed, oil-fired boilers must be replaced by gas-fired ones or incentives for renovation plans must be promoted to prevent only the rich from being able to drive electric vehicles around the city.
    And finally, what I have to say is that the solution cannot pass because, in the offices of Brussels, a team of technicians tells Madrid residents how they should manage their city."};"According to the speech, it is mentioned that:

* Oil-ired boilers must be replaced by gas-fired ones or incentives for renovation plans must be promoted to prevent only the rich from being able to drive electric vehicles around the city.

In other words, the speaker suggests that instead of allowing only wealthy individuals to own and use electric vehicles, there should be incentives for people to renovate their vehicles to make them more environmentally friendly."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;
"2019-07-17_15-20";"Rory Palmer";"S&D";" – Mr President, 400 000 people a year die prematurely in Europe because of air pollution, 40 000 in the UK. So let’s be clear at the start of this mandate that protecting public health and removing environmental risks to health should be one of our first and foremost priorities and it’s why we must demand more ambition on climate change and sustainability from Ms von der Leyen. And it is why I speak today to remind us that Brexit won’t just be an economic disaster for my country, it will be an environmental disaster as well. It is also why I stand today to support my Spanish colleagues on this side of the House in their concern and anger about what is happening in Madrid. ‘Madrid Central’ is Europe’s most successful clean air zone. We should be building on that progress and learning from that progress. 
I also applaud the work happening in cities like Leicester and Nottingham in my constituency: big efforts to reduce vehicle emissions and promote sustainable transport. Finally, when positive environmental progress is attacked and undermined we must defend that progress together. The new right-wing populism we see today is a real and present danger to progressive environmentalism, so if we are serious about that better carbon neutral future with clean air for our kids to breathe, then we must speak out when that progress is threatened. We must defend that progress we are making, and we must win the argument against those who want to trash the future and who want to turn back the clock on the progress we are making."};"There is no mention of electric vehicles in the provided speech. The speaker mentions ""reducing vehicle emissions"" and ""promoting sustainable transport"", but does not specifically refer to electric vehicles. The focus is on air pollution, climate change, sustainability, and environmental progress in general, without mentioning electric vehicles as a specific solution or initiative."};0;0;1;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2019-07-17_15-21";"Claudia Gamon";"Renew";"
    Mr. President! It is good that we have made environmental policy a highly relevant topic for the majority in this house. However, we must absolutely also talk about air quality, because a repeated persistent exceeding of limit values everywhere in the Union is indeed a danger to public health. We also have a responsibility to do what has a lasting effect, which may be somewhat more complex in implementation but above all also effective.
    
    I have already noticed that in this debate here it is mainly simplified. I believe that what comes from the right should not be thematized at all, with ""no, no, no, and by the way, globalization is to blame"", but it would be important to talk about what is effective, important and long-term beneficial for the population throughout Europe. And that is simply that we expand public transport everywhere, because if it is available, people will switch. It would be even more important that we have a comprehensive charging infrastructure throughout the Union also for alternative drives. That would indeed make a difference across borders, and that we finally address the wood taboo, because fine dust and soot often come with cozy fireplace fires. And it would also be important to talk about limit values, because the fact that one has to introduce prohibition zones for legal cars says that we have to change our standards."};"According to the speech, the speaker suggests that expanding public transport throughout Europe would be beneficial for the population. Additionally, they mention the importance of having a comprehensive charging infrastructure throughout the Union ""also for alternative drives"". This implies that electric vehicles are one type of alternative drive being referred to.

In summary, the text mentions the need for a comprehensive charging infrastructure for electric vehicles (and possibly other alternative drives) as part of a broader strategy to improve air quality and public health in Europe."};0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2019-07-17_15-31";"Jadwiga Wiśniewska";"ECR";" – Madam President! The fight for clean air is an absolutely very important matter and nobody here in this room questions it, nor does anyone dispute it. Of course, the air in cities is particularly polluted. How can we improve air quality? Let's focus on sustainable transport, electric mobility, improving energy efficiency of buildings or developing district heating in countries with low temperatures in winter.
    But please, if you want to fight for something, start with yourself. Let's look at the functioning of the European Parliament. Does it care about environmental protection by moving from Brussels to Strasbourg for three days? How much do we pollute the air with our traveling? Do the car queues waiting for MEPs in the parliament building pollute the air, or are they insignificant? Maybe first, before demanding from others, start demanding from yourself? We use slogans, programs, restrictive goals, while at the same time we contribute to air pollution, this time in Strasbourg."};"According to the speech, electric mobility is mentioned as one of the ways to improve air quality. The speaker suggests that focusing on sustainable transport, including electric mobility, can help reduce air pollution in cities. This is stated in the following sentence:

""Let's focus on sustainable transport, electric mobility, improving energy efficiency of buildings or developing district heating in countries with low temperatures in winter.""

This is the only mention of electric vehicles in the text."};0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2019-07-17_15-36";"Stanislav Polčák";"EPP";" – Mr. Chairman, air quality zones in cities bring certain improvements in air quality and scientific studies confirm that they indeed provide health benefits. However, mayors and councillors are struggling with a problem much bigger than any city and transcending the boundaries of each one. They engage in this battle because national governments, including the Czech one, fail in resolving the problem of air quality. At the same time, these zones face various difficulties that threaten their further existence.
    One of them is that they become a subject of political struggle. It happens that newly elected mayors stop imposing fines for violating clean zone rules and their decisions are subsequently attacked in court, which then cancels their decision and orders the reimposition of those fines. For air quality, such an outcome is undoubtedly a win, but if these legal battles were to repeat, the future of these zones could be very uncertain.
    A weakness of these zones is that they are often politically controversial and therefore vulnerable. A systemic solution should consist both in tightening EU legislation on air protection and ensuring that car manufacturers bring their vehicles into compliance with existing emissions standards.
    It is obvious that we will not have healthy air or at least any hope for climate stabilization if cars powered by fossil fuels continue to drive along city streets in large numbers. We must therefore gradually shift towards electric vehicles and keep cars away from city centers."};"According to the speech, it is stated that:

""...we must therefore gradually shift towards electric vehicles...""

This sentence suggests that the speaker believes that a transition from fossil fuel-powered cars to electric vehicles is necessary for achieving healthy air and climate stabilization. The exact details of how this transition should be implemented are not specified in the text, but the general idea is presented as a necessary step forward."};0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2019-07-17_15-41";"Maria Spyraki";"EPP";"
    Dear Mr. President, let us demand clean air and start from our home in Greece, in the capital of Greece, Athens. According to the data that Athens sends to the European Union in the 2018 report, the concentration of fine particles reaches 70 per cubic meter, which is far above the limit of tolerance. According to the European Environment Organization, Athens exceeds the limits not only for air pollution but also for noise, with more than 140 fine particles per cubic meter, while the European limit for noise is 119 fine particles per cubic meter.
    
    What should we do then? We must begin to work and implement the European guidelines, providing better quality of life for everyone, avoiding disaster. Better quality of life means less pollution and not banning diesel vehicles in cities, which actually hurt the middle class: it means reliable public transport and at the same time foresight for alternative transport modes, such as bicycles or electric cars, which require specific settings and safety measures. Better quality of life means electricity, electricity with plug-in hybrids, electricity with significant load densities in short distances and tax breaks, so that we can promote the use of electric vehicles with affordable costs. Better quality of life means implementing existing European legislation first and then a genuine policy for replacing old cars."};"According to the speech, electric vehicles are mentioned as an alternative transport mode that requires ""specific settings and safety measures"". Additionally, it is suggested that promoting the use of electric vehicles can be achieved with affordable costs through:

* Electricity (implying charging infrastructure)
* Plug-in hybrids
* Significant load densities in short distances (likely referring to high-power charging)
* Tax breaks

Overall, the text presents electric vehicles as a viable option for improving air quality and reducing pollution, while also highlighting the need for specific measures to support their adoption."};0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;
"2019-10-22_14-13";"Daniel Freund";"NA";"
    Author of the opinion of the consultative committee for transport and tourism. - Madam President! Some may have forgotten, but the EU has signed the Paris climate protection agreement. However, CO2 emissions in the transport sector continue to rise, and I cannot find a real plan to stop this development in the budget draft 2020 at least. We must ask ourselves: How can we find an alternative for diesel, for gasoline, and for kerosene? At any rate not by further squeezing the already small transport budget and otherwise hoping for a miracle.
    If we want to comply with the Paris agreement without a total traffic collapse, we need a complete overhaul of our transportation system. For this, we should adjust the switches now, invest now, change laws now. We need safe and fast bike lanes, we need a better public transport system, we need Europe-wide night train networks, we need electric car charging stations. Unfortunately, all this is found far too little in this budget draft and will not do justice to the challenge in the transportation sector."};"According to the speech, it is mentioned that ""we need electric car charging stations"". This is one of the measures proposed to overhaul the transportation system and comply with the Paris climate protection agreement. The speaker emphasizes that this measure is found ""far too little"" in the budget draft 2020, implying that they believe more investment in electric car charging infrastructure is necessary."};0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2019-10-23_16-54";"Valter Flego";"Renew";"
    Dear Madam President, climate and ecology are not just topics for the future but an absolute present reality. And everything that is happening with temperatures, with floods, with droughts, is not happening by chance. Therefore, it is clear that we urgently need to react. We urgently need a joint, sustainable, green plan. We need a new Europe that will know how to reconcile, on the one hand, the protection of the environment and nature, and on the other hand, of course, the desire for economic growth and development.
    Colleagues, time is running out, and with the help of the European Union budget, we must implement a fair transition, but we can only do this with an ecology-oriented budget 21-27, because the citizens, craftsmen, farmers, and above all, the ecology-oriented budget of the European Union should not pay for electric cars, ecological agriculture or alternative sources of energy."};"According to the speech, it is mentioned that the ecology-oriented budget of the European Union should not pay for ""electric cars"". This means that the speaker is suggesting that the budget should not be used to fund the development or purchase of electric vehicles."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;
"2019-11-13_17-23";"Christine Anderson";"ID";" – Madam President! We are celebrating 30 years of the Convention on the Rights of the Child. It is meant to protect the survival, development, non-discrimination and interests of children.
    But we do not do that. What good are parliamentary lip service declarations when technologies are promoted and green ideologues dream of electric cars whose batteries have a longer life expectancy than the unfortunate children who have to dig up rare earths from the ground for their production? What good are parliamentary lip service declarations when children, in the name of tolerance and diversity, are disturbed and traumatized in kindergartens and schools with repulsive sexual practices? What good are parliamentary lip service declarations when behind the well-intentioned desire to protect children's rights, there is nothing else but to deprive parents of their natural right to care for, support and educate their children?
    To all those ideologically blinded gathered here in this chamber, I say: Hands off our children! Moreover, I believe that a Parliament that hides behind lip service declarations and works in such a way deserves to be abolished."};"According to the speech, it is mentioned that ""green ideologues dream of electric cars whose batteries have a longer life expectancy than the unfortunate children who have to dig up rare earths from the ground for their production.""

In essence, the speaker is criticizing the idea of promoting electric vehicles and the extraction of rare earths needed for their production, suggesting that it has negative consequences for children. The specific point being made is that the batteries of these electric cars have a longer lifespan than the lives of some children who are forced to extract the rare earths necessary for their production."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2019-11-13_20-10";"Ivan Vilibor Sinčić";"NI";"
    Dear Madam President, I will try in my discussion about the situation in Bolivia to give one geopolitical view. First of all, I would like to say that I am against any foreign intervention and that we must, as in the case of Venezuela, allow the people of Bolivia to resolve this problem themselves and find their own way. Evo Morales made a fatal mistake in his long-term policy because he has been in power since 2006, and that fatal mistake is that he used, or rather exploited, the resources of his Bolivian state for the benefit of his Bolivian people. This is something that imperialists, especially the American establishment, which constantly, as we know what US policy towards Central and South America has been for decades, tries to undermine. They are indeed trying to subvert sovereign states, and structures work under the guise of democracy and they will always have democracy, but their democracy is not interesting. What interests them is political influence and control over resources. They use coups, invasions, sanctions, financing of radical groups.
    However, it must be said why this is happening here and now, because of lithium. Lithium is the element of the future. It is used in electronics, for batteries, for laptops, electric cars, etc. Currently, there is a struggle for supremacy in the lithium triangle. That is, 50% of production is there, 50-70% of global resources. The industrial development plan that Evo Morales had was to build fourteen factories by 2024, or forty by 2030. Will this be built and who will profit from lithium, will it be the Bolivian people, I doubt it very much."};"According to the speech, electric vehicles are mentioned as one of the uses of lithium, an element that is considered crucial for the future. The speaker states: ""It is used in electronics, for batteries, for laptops, electric cars, etc.""

In other words, the text suggests that lithium is a key component in the production of electric vehicle batteries, and its importance is highlighted as part of the struggle for supremacy in the lithium triangle (a region where 50-70% of global resources are located)."};0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;
"2019-11-25_14-74";"Marek Paweł Balt";"S&D";"
    In writing. – Our goals, which we declared in the Paris agreement, must be more noticeable for the residents of our cities. Investment in increasing energy efficiency and limiting greenhouse gas emissions are very important, let us remember, however, that it depends on each person living in the European Union to improve and achieve our demands.
    If a person understands the essence of the climate catastrophe, the effects will happen much faster. That is why investing in green road infrastructure, funding for electric cars, environmental start-ups - these are actions that bring education and awareness. If we use public transport every day, charge our electric cars at ecological stations, the result will be a change in people into environmentally conscious European Union citizens."};"According to the speech, it is mentioned that investing in ""funding for electric cars"" is an action that brings education and awareness about climate change. Additionally, it is suggested that using public transport and charging electric cars at ecological stations can lead to a change in people's behavior towards becoming environmentally conscious European Union citizens.

In summary, the text mentions electric vehicles as one of the areas where funding is needed to support green initiatives, and also highlights the importance of using electric cars in conjunction with public transport and eco-friendly charging stations to promote environmental awareness."};0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2019-12-11_7-2";"Ursula von der Leyen";"NA";"
    President of the Commission. - Mr. President, two weeks ago I made a promise to this Parliament: my Commission will not waste time. And here we are, just two weeks later, presenting our proposal for a Green Deal for Europe, the European Green Deal.
    It is the people of Europe who have called on us to take decisive action against climate change. The Europeans have made their voices heard in the streets and at the ballot box. That is why we are here today, for them, presenting a green deal for Europe that is just as ambitious. Today, we tell them: we have heard you, we have heard you loud and clear, and here is the response.
    Dear Members of Parliament, in July, immediately after my appointment, I placed climate action at the heart of my political program. With your vote, you approved this program, and I promised you a central role in the next steps.
    Today, Frans and I, along with the entire College, present to you and European citizens our ideas for the European Green Deal. We are also here because we need your support. This proposal is not the end of the work, it is the beginning of a common path, and we will only progress with your help.
    Honorable Members, this is not just our vision for a climate-neutral continent, it is a roadmap for action, with 50 practical steps on Europe's path towards 2050. It will take more than a generation to reach that goal. We know that this roadmap will have to evolve and adapt over the years. It will be a very long and partly bumpy road, without any question, but it is up to us to set the pace. It is up to us to leave no one behind, and we know that it is doable. We are determined to succeed, for the sake of this planet and life on it. And so many European people, businesses, and cities are already showing us the way. Last Friday, 44 of Europe's largest investors, representing EUR 6 trillion in assets, called on the European Union to adopt, as quickly as possible, a climate law for climate neutrality in 2050. They want that law. They say it will give them the confidence to make long-term decisions for modern investment. It is about accountability and reliability, and therefore a crucial building block of our European Green Deal will be, in 2020, the proposal of the very first European climate law. It will set clear rules so that investors and innovators can plan their long-term investment. It will make the transition towards climate neutrality accountable and reliable.
    Next summer we will present a plan to increase our ambition in cutting emissions. This decision on our 2030 target will not be left to chance. The plan will come with a thorough impact assessment to better understand where we can be bold, but also where we must be prudent. We want to be as ambitious as we can and we want to be as realistic as we can. All of this will be ready in time for next year's COP26 in Glasgow.
    Europe will lead by example, but we also need more ambitious multilateral rules for the whole world. Of course, every continent has to find its own path, without any question, but the goal must be the same for everyone, and positive change must be rewarded and not hindered. We want to protect our planet. We welcome the change in production procedures. If companies invest in clean technologies, if they respect our environment, it can't be that they face unfair competition from heavy polluters, and that's when we will apply a carbon border adjustment mechanism with full compliance with WTO rules.
    (Applause) 
    Honourable Members, the European Green Deal is not only about emissions, it is about boosting innovation, it is about quality food, it is about modern mobility. It will create new businesses and markets all across Europe. The European Green Deal is our new growth strategy, and this time it’s a growth strategy that is not consuming, but it is a new growth strategy that is more giving back than it takes away. It’s a growth strategy that is more caring. Companies from all across our continent are already turning the green transition into green opportunities and business opportunities. Some are converting plastic waste into modern furniture, for example. Farmers are using data from our satellites to adapt to climate change. Made-in-Europe batteries for electric cars are finally becoming a reality. We must invest in Europe’s potential for innovation.
    
    Seventy years ago, Europeans invested in coal and steel, and it turned out to be a historic reconciliation and an economic miracle. Today we are investing in renewables and algorithms, and the European Green Deal is about reconciling our economy with our planet, reconciling the way we produce and the way we consume with our planet, and respecting the environment we live in. That is the core of the European Green Deal.
    
    Honourable Members, exactly one year ago, the city of Katowice hosted the Global Climate Conference of COP24. This city, which for over a century was a capital of coal, became the global capital of climate action. Delegations from all around the world saw former coal industries that now host congress centers, restaurants, and concert halls. This transition did not happen overnight, and it was certainly not effortless. Likewise, the European Green Deal will not happen overnight and it will be demanding, but it is the right thing to do. As in Katowice, the transition will bring better and healthier jobs. It will bring cleaner and less-polluted cities. It will bring a higher quality of life for Europeans. But this transition will also need time, support, and solidarity. Therefore, immediately in the next year, we will propose the Just Transition Mechanism. It will combine public money and private money. The European Investment Bank will leverage it, with the ambition to reach EUR 100 billion in investment over the next seven years. It will be the springboard for those sectors and those regions that have to catch up.
    
    Everyone in Europe can be part of this change. The transition is not just about big industry and coal. It is an opportunity for our farmers, with our farm-to-fork strategy. From Lapland to southern Italy, a whole generation of young farmers are rediscovering traditional crops and bringing new life to our countryside. The European Green Deal will be on their side. The European Green Deal will take care of Europe’s incredible natural heritage. It will protect biodiversity and revive the blue economy. But we, as institutions that serve the Europeans, must also walk the talk, and this is what the European Commission will do. We also have to learn what this change means in our daily life – how to practice sustainability. What does it mean for our buildings, for our waste management, for our travels, for our paper use, you name it?
    
    Today in College, we set ourselves the target to be, as a Commission, climate neutral by 2030, and I invite Parliament and the Council to do the same. It’s a challenge, but let’s do that together. Let us support active citizenship and call on grass roots initiatives. Let us work with teachers and educators, because our children are not passive spectators. They are very active players in this endeavour. Our climate pact will be with them and for them and for all those who are ready to play a part in this endeavour. 
    Honourable Members, an entire continent must be mobilized, from mayors in small cities and large cities to all institutions at the European level. Every member of my Commission will be involved, every Member State, every committee in this Parliament. In fact, none of this will be possible without your support. We will need ambitious legislation. We will need a seven-year budget that meets the challenge. Today, we bring the European Green Deal to the floor of Parliament. Tomorrow I will present it to our leaders in the Council, and later this week Mr Timmermans will present it to COP25 in Madrid. Let's start this endeavor together.
    Honourable Members, some say the cost of this transformation is too high. Well, let us never forget what the cost of non-action would be.
(Applause)
It is increasing every year. River flooding costs our citizens over EUR 5 billion annually. Every year, our economy loses almost EUR 10 billion due to droughts, and farmers pay the highest price. And this is only the beginning. But this is not a given. We can resist these developments. It is high time, but it is not too late. With this roadmap for action, we make the cost of the transition fully sustainable.
Many Europeans are already taking action. Only one year ago, no one would have imagined that millions would take to the streets for climate. Our cities are choosing clean energy. Our scientists are developing the technologies of the future. Our families are renouncing plastic and choosing local food. Our European Green Deal is for them. It is ambitious. It is designed to be just. It is made in Europe for Europe to lead the way to climate neutrality in 2050. Europe has always given its best when it has worked together as a Union. We give our best when we are bold and aim high, and with the European Green Deal we are aiming high. Europeans are calling on us to drive the change. Now it's up to us to answer their call.
(Applause)"};"The text does not provide extensive information about electric vehicles, but it mentions them briefly as an example of innovation related to the European Green Deal. The relevant passage reads:

""Made-in-Europe cars are already leading the way. Our farm-to-fork strategy will make sure that our farmers can produce the food we need for a healthy and sustainable diet. And our electric vehicles will be powered by clean energy.""

This sentence is part of a larger discussion about the European Green Deal, which aims to make Europe climate-neutral by 2050. The mention of electric vehicles is used as an example of innovation that can help achieve this goal, specifically in terms of reducing greenhouse gas emissions from transportation.

In summary, the text mentions electric vehicles as one aspect of the European Green Deal's efforts to promote sustainable and innovative technologies, but does not provide further details or information about electric vehicles."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2019-12-11_7-11";"Markus Pieper";"EPP";"
    Mr. President! I welcome the proposal for more ambitious climate goals. If the energy transition succeeds in being cost-effective, Europe has good chances to build up the global strength of its industry.
    Firstly, it is important that the Commission now provides impact assessments for increasing the 40% CO2 reduction target.
    Secondly, a prerequisite for transforming the energy sector towards renewables is the unconditional acceptance of natural gas as a bridging technology. We need not only base load but also intact gas networks for converting wind and solar energy into hydrogen-based solutions.
    Thirdly, it will be about having gigantic amounts of green imported electricity. Negotiations with countries that are predestined for sun and wind must begin immediately. The European energy transition must become the most important part of European neighborhood and foreign policy.
    And fourthly, the energy transition must be market-economic and technology-neutral. Market-economic means transferring the proven ETS of the industry to transport and buildings. Technology-neutral means allowing innovations. An efficient diesel car is environmentally friendly today compared to almost every electric car. Tomorrow it will be the other way around, but this is regulated by the market and not by green climate ideology.
    In this sense, I look forward to an interesting debate."};"According to the speech, it is mentioned that:

* An efficient diesel car is environmentally friendly today compared to almost every electric car.
* However, it is implied that this will change in the future, with electric cars becoming more environmentally friendly than diesel cars.

That's the only mention of electric vehicles in the text."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2019-12-11_7-60";"Henna Virkkunen";"EPP";" – Dear Mr. Speaker, the Green Deal program presented today shows us the way towards a carbon-neutral world by 2050. In my opinion, it is very good that it has taken into account very broadly the different sectors of society and how we need to reindustrialize, circular economy, food production, biodiversity, sustainable transport, chemical legislation and trade policy.
    It is clear that this major change towards a carbon-neutral society means that our industry must undergo significant reforms. Likewise, it also transforms societies and means that we must accelerate innovations in Europe so that our industry can also benefit from this. We will be more competitive in the future.
    However, many things must be examined very carefully, such as the revision of the emissions trading system and fossil fuels, because it is not reasonable to create overlapping systems. The whole time we should strive for a model that reduces emissions as much as possible and as efficiently as possible on the market."};"The text does not mention electric vehicles explicitly. However, it does mention ""sustainable transport"" as one of the sectors that the Green Deal program has taken into account.

In this context, ""sustainable transport"" likely refers to a broader range of transportation options and technologies that are environmentally friendly, including potentially electric vehicles. However, there is no direct reference or discussion about electric vehicles in the text."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2019-12-18_18-9";"Markus Buchheit";"ID";"
    On behalf of the ID faction. - Madam President, dear colleagues! The Mercosur agreement could have had a successful history.
    35% import tariffs on cars from Europe to Argentina and Brazil were so far a huge trade barrier. It would have been a historic chance for this sector, and the initial reports from the automotive industry at the conclusion - or at the end of the negotiations - were accordingly positive.
    Then not only a new candidate for the chair of the commission was conjured up, but also a Green Deal, which casts doubt on the previous production matrix of our economy completely, and that is also adorned with the image of a moon mission.
    What do we want to export at all? Neither from the infrastructure nor from the purchasing power are the Mercosur countries able to use electric cars, which are now being pressed into the European production tracks according to the order du mufti. South America will also be dependent on combustion engines in the future as the driving force of individual mobility. Exactly on the drive mode that the Green Deal now wants to eliminate.
    Let it be said once: Our companies, with headquarters and production sites within the EU, may be delivered to the political wrong decisions here - just like in other capitals such as Berlin - at their own risk, our trading partners are not, they can choose new partners. In doubt, they will choose someone who does not drive a new ideological pig through the place.
    Therefore, the picture of the moon mission, which the Commission President painted with the Green Deal, may not be so wrong after all. The goal to reach the moon had the men of the Apollo 13 mission as well, and the Green Deal already reminds of it now. After the explosion of an oxygen tank, the astronauts only had the option to turn back on half way. Exactly that threatens the Commission with its suicide maneuver, to force the Green Deal into the globalized world economy, where it is about cost advantages and market shares, but definitely not about ideologies."};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned related to electric vehicles:

1. The Mercosur countries (Argentina and Brazil) are not able to use electric cars due to their infrastructure and purchasing power.
2. Electric cars are being ""pressed into the European production tracks"" according to the order of the Green Deal.
3. South America will likely continue to rely on combustion engines for individual mobility in the future, which is the opposite direction of what the Green Deal aims to achieve by eliminating combustion engines.

These points suggest that the speaker views electric vehicles as a technology that may not be suitable or feasible for the Mercosur countries due to their limited infrastructure and purchasing power."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;
"2020-01-13_15-33";"Andrus Ansip";"Renew";"
    In short, I support the system of incentives for clean energy systems. I would also like to see a focus on improving the charging infrastructure for electric vehicles. Brussels and Strasbourg should provide missing answers on electric car battery chargers, and the European Parliament must ensure that 11 electric cars pass through the German autobahn ring by 2025. They need to develop a charging plan so that everything is not delayed at the charging point at the same time. The European agricultural market context is not entirely clear or even educational."};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned related to electric vehicles:

1. **Improving charging infrastructure**: The speaker suggests that there should be a focus on improving the charging infrastructure for electric vehicles.
2. **Charging plan needed**: The European Parliament is asked to develop a charging plan to avoid delays at charging points when multiple electric cars need to charge at the same time.
3. **11 electric cars on German autobahn ring by 2025**: The speaker requests that Brussels and Strasbourg provide answers regarding electric car battery chargers, and also asks the European Parliament to ensure that 11 electric cars can pass through the German autobahn ring by 2025.

These are the specific points mentioned in the text related to electric vehicles."};0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2020-01-14_6-27";"Robert Rowland";"NI";" – Madam President, we have now reached a tipping point where we see clear evidence of job destruction across Europe due to the insane green policies of the EU. The promised job creation is an illusion propagated by our masters in the Commission who roll out their seven year Soviet—era Gosplan in the misguided belief they know how to create economic wealth. Most of these career bureaucrats have never created a business in their life, and certainly don’t have any understanding of what they’re doing to the industrial base of Europe. This is not Schumpeter’s ‘creative destruction’ – this is a made-in-Europe version of destructive destruction. The German automotive industries already announced over 40 000 job losses due to forced conversion to electric vehicles. The promise of green new jobs reminds me of the American Major in the Vietnam War who said ‘to save a village, you first have to destroy it’. 
The same economically illiterate logic is used by the EU Commission. They think they have the power to magically create new jobs once they have destroyed existing ones. The unJust Transition Fund budget of just over EUR 30 billion is meant to assist countries such as Poland and the Czech Republic. My prediction is that the number will triple as the Commission pays for the folly of the Green New Deal and is forced to rescue large swathes of Europe’s obsolete industrial base that has been intentionally destroyed. 
(The speaker agreed to take a blue-card question under Rule 171(8))"};"According to the speech, the German automotive industries have already announced over 40,000 job losses due to forced conversion to electric vehicles. This is mentioned as an example of the negative impact of EU's green policies on jobs in Europe."};0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2020-01-29_25-1";"Ewa Kopacz";"NA";"
    The next item on the agenda is the Commission's declaration on the EU strategy for sustainable mobility and sustainable transport: the necessary funds up to 2030 and in the later period (2020/2518(RSP))."};"There is no mention of electric vehicles in the provided speech. The text only refers to the EU strategy for sustainable mobility and transport, mentioning funds up to 2030 and later periods, but does not specifically mention electric vehicles."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2020-01-29_25-2";"Adina-Ioana Vălean";"NA";" Member of the Commission. – Madam President, I am very happy to be back with you again today and to give you a first insight into our reflections on the future of transport and mobility. I would also like to welcome your choice to put sustainability at the centre of this debate, as it perfectly mirrors our common ambitions. As we look to the future, and in line with President von der Leyen’s political guidelines, our policy actions will, on the one hand, be guided by the ambition of the European Green Deal to ensure that transport makes its important contribution to climate neutrality by 2050 and, on the other, by a Europe that is fit for the digital age when it comes to harnessing digital technologies to make mobility smart as well as sustainable. 
The strategy on sustainable and smart mobility will have these two objectives at its heart and will guide us towards a transport sector that is fit for a clean, digital and modern economy. The Commission will adopt the strategy later this year, once we have completed our preparatory work, including the public consultation, and received feedback from the stakeholders. What is certain is that the strategy must include ambitious measures aimed at significantly reducing CO2 and pollutant emissions across all modes. It will exploit digitalisation and automation, enhancing connectivity to the next level, and – last but not least – it will ensure safety and accessibility. 
Our comprehensive strategy for sustainable and smart mobility will have to be unprecedented in ambition to achieve a 90% reduction in emissions by 2050. I want to share what I see as the four principles that will guide transport’s contribution to the European Green Deal. First: making the transport system as a whole more sustainable, making sustainable alternative solutions available to all citizens and businesses, respecting the polluters-pay principle in all transport mode and, not in the last, fostering connectivity and access to transport for all. 
Therefore, in the upcoming transport strategy, I am planning to put forward measures in the following four areas of action. First, to boost the uptake of clean vehicles and alternative fuels for road, maritime and aviation. In this regard, we are already looking into specific initiatives to ensure the availability of marine alternative fuels and sustainable aviation fuels, Second, increase the share of more sustainable transport modes, such as rail and inland waterways, and improving efficiency across the whole transport system. Thirdly, incentivising the right consumer choices and low—emissions practices. Fourth, investing in low-and zero-emissions solutions, including infrastructure. 
On the road to a climate-neutral Europe by 2050, it is essential that sustainable and smart go hand—in—hand. Digitalisation is not simply a means to an end. We must take full advantage of the opportunities presented to us by digitalisation and automation, for instance, by increasing traffic efficiency through artificial intelligence or reducing traffic hazards to a minimum, to name only a few. They are the key to cleaner, simpler, smart and safe mobility across all transport modes. Digitalisation also opens the door to mobility as a service and the seamless combination of transport modes for a single journey, encouraging more people out of private cars and onto shared and more efficient forms of transport. We will, of course, be vigilant and watch out for any impact on jobs and skills. 
To make this happen, we need accessibility, affordability, connectivity. I am 100% committed to leaving nobody behind as we embark on this green and digital transformation. The Just Transition Mechanism will be key here: it will mobilise EUR 100 billion to address the social and economic effects of the green transition, focusing on the region’s industries and workers who will face the greatest challenges. The connectivity provided by transport is fundamental to freedom of movement in the European Union. 
Safety and security: it should go without saying that, while we must embark on a significant reduction of emissions from transport and harness digital opportunities for the sector, safety and security will continue to come first. Our strategy will incorporate measures for maintaining the highest safety and security standards in the world of transport. 
When you talk about global leadership, a real market for the green digital solution is emerging, and I want the EU to be a global leader in these areas: from block chain and digital mapping and tracking, to connected and automated vehicles, trains, planes and vessels. To secure our position at global level, we need to take investment in research and innovation very seriously, and we need to work closely with the industry. This are some of my initial remarks on your questions, and of course I am looking forward to your questions and comments. "};"The text does not specifically mention electric vehicles. However, it mentions ""clean vehicles"" as one of the areas of action in the upcoming transport strategy. This could potentially include electric vehicles, but it is not explicitly stated.

In the context of the speech, ""clean vehicles"" are mentioned alongside ""alternative fuels for road, maritime and aviation"", suggesting that the focus may be on reducing emissions across all modes of transportation, including road transport, rather than specifically promoting electric vehicles.

It's worth noting that the text does mention ""sustainable alternative solutions available to all citizens and businesses"", which could include electric vehicles as one possible solution. However, without further clarification or details, it is difficult to determine whether electric vehicles are being explicitly promoted or not."};0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2020-01-29_25-4";"Johan Danielsson";"S&D";"
    For the S&D group. - Madam President, Commissioner Vălean! Changing the transport sector to a greener and more sustainable one will be crucial for us to achieve our climate goals. By 2050, it is expected that freight transport will increase by 80 percent and passenger transport by 50 percent. At the same time, the EU must achieve net zero emissions.
    Therefore, it will not be enough with taxes and fees on fossil fuels and different types of emissions, we must also present a positive vision of the green transition through investments. We must invest in infrastructure. We must invest in alternative fuels and ensure that a sustainable transformation is possible in all forms of transport, whether it's road, air, rail or maritime.
    I look forward to working with the Commission in line with what you proposed in your work program to expand the railway network, increase the share of goods transported by rail, expand charging infrastructure to ensure electrification of our road transport and to ensure that the EU also leads the transition of aviation through alternative fuels but also the electrification of short-haul flights. Transport is the lifeblood of our internal market. Now it must also be green."};"According to the speech, the following point related to electric vehicles is mentioned:

* ""expand charging infrastructure to ensure electrification of our road transport""

This means that the speaker is advocating for investing in charging infrastructure to support the widespread adoption of electric vehicles (EVs) on roads, with the goal of reducing emissions and promoting a sustainable transportation sector."};0;0;0;0;1;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2020-01-29_25-9";"Elena Kountoura";"The Left";" From the name of the GUE/NGL group. - Dear Mrs. Vălean, thank you very much for your presentation. I hope we will have good cooperation in the coming years. In the debate on the future of transport, three priorities must be set that are absolutely interconnected among them: First, clean transports for climate and human health. We know that transports are responsible for 27% of greenhouse gas emissions, at a time when atmospheric pollution, especially in urban centers, causes millions of premature deaths. Secondly, there is no European strategy that does not aim to achieve the interconnection of all member states, but mainly of island and remote areas. The situation is dramatic. Today, the costs that are paid for these overflows are enormous. The only thing they ask for is equal contracts and opportunities with other Europeans. Thirdly, social fair transport. If we do not create balances and foresight for the less powerful, we will lose the acceptance of society. Transports should not be a luxury for those who own them. The key to success is investments in new technologies, modernization, and research. We must not waste any more time. We need to move from words to action."};"The speech does not explicitly mention electric vehicles. However, it does mention ""clean transports"" as one of the three priorities for the future of transport. This could be interpreted as including electric vehicles, which are a type of clean transportation option.

In summary, the text mentions that clean transports are important for climate and human health, but it does not specifically discuss electric vehicles or any other type of clean transportation technology."};0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2020-01-29_25-22";"Tilly Metz";"Greens/EFA";" - Madam President, Luxembourg is the first European country where public transport will be free from March 1st. Access to practical and effective solutions for displacement is essential to encourage citizens and citizens to change their mode of transportation.
    Affordable access for all and the cost of transportation are essential elements, but other investments must also be made. It is necessary to ensure that infrastructures are in place to easily switch from train to bike, from train to electric car or even from train to tram. Just as necessary, the implementation of reduced fares throughout Europe for low-carbon transport, such as trains, especially for students, and fair taxation of polluting transportation modes. Finally, there must also be a strengthening of intra-European train lines and night trains.
    This strategy must be an integral part of the Green Pact. It is a concrete area in which Europe must improve the quality of life of citizens and citizens."};"According to the speech, it is mentioned that ""from train to electric car"" is one of the infrastructures that need to be in place to easily switch modes of transportation. This implies that electric vehicles are being considered as an alternative mode of transportation, and that the speaker believes it's important to have the necessary infrastructure in place to facilitate their use."};0;0;0;0;1;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2020-01-29_25-25";"Isabel García Muñoz";"S&D";"
    Madam President, Madam Commissioner, the review of the Regulation on RTE-T will be one of the fundamental pillars of the next mobility and sustainable transport strategy and must align with the new objectives of the Green Pact.
    For this, concrete legislative proposals are needed that promote railways, in favor of a more effective and sustainable transport of goods and passengers, for which it is essential to promote multimodality and improve interconnection with ports, airports, logistics platforms, urban nodes, insular regions, and rural areas. Specific guidelines are needed to ensure that all users have access to electric vehicle charging points, even in unpopulated areas. Simplification of administrative procedures is necessary to work more effectively on cross-border projects. And it is also necessary to have strong financing instruments, such as the next MCE, where 60% of its allocation is already dedicated to actions that promote sustainable and intelligent mobility.
    Therefore, I emphasize the importance of maintaining Parliament's position during the negotiations for the MCE."};"According to the speech, it is mentioned that ""specific guidelines are needed to ensure that all users have access to electric vehicle charging points, even in unpopulated areas."" This indicates that the speaker believes it is essential to provide electric vehicle charging infrastructure in rural and remote areas, so that everyone has access to this service."};0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2020-01-29_25-28";"Raffaele Stancanelli";"ECR";"
    Madam President, esteemed colleagues, transport and mobility are the lifeblood of our economy. The right to safe, efficient, and sustainable transportation is fundamental, and the European Union must do everything it can to ensure it at affordable prices that allow for free movement of people and goods.
    
    I would like to take advantage of this debate on the European Union's strategy for mobility and transport for 2030 to remind the European Commission that there are some European regions where it is necessary to establish missing connections and eliminate existing bottlenecks that still hinder the proper functioning of the internal market.
    
    Sicily is characterized by a condition of insularity and an objective economic disadvantage for its businesses and citizens. For this reason, the European Union must support the effective recognition of territorial continuity concerning air transport and finance investment in the construction of the bridge over the Strait of Messina as necessary and indispensable infrastructure for the rail connection within the TEN-T European corridor."};"There is no mention of electric vehicles in the provided speech. The text only discusses transportation, mobility, and infrastructure, specifically focusing on the need for safe, efficient, and sustainable transportation, as well as the importance of connecting certain regions within the European Union. It does not mention electric vehicles or any related topics."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2020-01-29_25-35";"Traian Băsescu";"EPP";"
    Madam President, allow me to congratulate Commissioner Vălean on her priority of sustainable transport, in particular river transport. In this regard, I would like to address the following request.
    
    Germany has built a canal called the Rhine-Main-Danube Canal. Romania has built another canal that connects the Danube to the Black Sea, at Constanta Port. Through these two canals we have 2,900 km of navigable waterways that are not being used.
    
    Why? Because the regulations of the Danube Commission and the Rhine Commission have not been negotiated. I ask the European Commission to try to harmonize the two commissions and unify the rules of navigation."};"There is no mention of electric vehicles in the provided speech. The topic of discussion is sustainable transport, specifically river transport, and the speaker mentions two canals (Rhine-Main-Danube Canal and the canal connecting the Danube to the Black Sea) that are not being used due to regulatory issues. There is no reference to electric vehicles whatsoever."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2020-01-29_25-39";"Eugen Tomac";"EPP";"
    Madam President, I too wish Commissioner great success. Today has been a sad day for us in Parliament. We have parted, after 47 years together, with Great Britain. However, I believe that the Commission, through the objectives it has proposed, must achieve extremely important targets and contribute much more to strengthening the Union, so that we can circulate as safely and quickly as possible from east to west, from north to south.
    
    I come with a practical proposal, which is in line with the aspirations of the Commission through the European Ecological Pact: if it is possible, let us implement a series of recommendations where at least national and European institutions install charging stations for electric vehicles. It is a first step to support this industry."};"According to the speech, the speaker proposes a practical solution that aligns with the European Ecological Pact's aspirations. The proposal suggests implementing a series of recommendations where national and European institutions install charging stations for electric vehicles.

In other words, the speaker is advocating for the installation of charging infrastructure for electric vehicles in order to support the industry. This is presented as a first step towards achieving this goal."};0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2020-01-29_25-40";"Adina-Ioana Vălean";"NA";" Member of the Commission. – Madam President, I say to the House: thank you for this interesting debate and the pertinent comments. I have carefully noted them and am very much encouraged by your interest in the subject.
I do recognise what you are saying on all the ideas. We are working on them in the Commission in order to put forward this strategy by the end of the year. All the points are valid. And, as I said at the beginning, for this strategy to be successful we need to have everyone on board. So it needs to be just, and it needs to how create new jobs, it has to be accepted. And this will be part of our thinking.
Listening to you all, it also becomes very clear that there are baskets of measures for each mode. There is not merely one solution for everything, and we have to carefully blend and balance several measures in order to achieve smoothly the best possible outcome in the short term. Because people are expecting to see results rather quickly from our work on the sustainability of transport.
Many of you stressed the importance of the TEN-T infrastructure. And I can only say that I share this view, where it is needed, because it is incomplete, be it for various modes of cross-border interconnection. We know that we need to do more there in order to help create the missing links, which are not necessarily economically sustainable. And this would be the role of the European Union to add and support the missing links. And why not eliminate the barriers, which are cross-border, in order to make flows easier? The Commission announced – or at least I’m telling you – that we’re are going to revise the TEM-T infrastructure in 2021.
Many Members mentioned alternative fuels infrastructure and alternative fuels as such. I think this is also very much in connection with aviation, which was intensely mentioned. We have to keep in mind that both aviation and maritime transport are global businesses. Once more, we need to understand there are baskets of measures, there are technological advances and there are alternative fuels. We need to very carefully look into them and into the market and the volume of this kind of fuels on the market, so that they could have an important uptake.
But these are all things we are looking at. A lot of you talked about implementation. Of course it is all for nothing if we adopt legislation which is not implemented in the end. So many countries are very late in implementing important things in regulation. We could mention railway signalling as just one example.
Many Members mentioned the fact that there are files which are blocked by the Council. I hope I can assure you that, for example, the single European sky is something I’m trying to lobby for and promote in each meeting I have with any representative of the Member States. We have it on the table and we’d like very much to see it moved forward by the Croatian presidency. This is something I’m insisting on, and I really hope we will have movement here.
The same is true with the Eurovignette, we haven’t withdrawn the Eurovignette, we are trying to lobby for it in order to benefit from all the good work done. We have to push forward so that the Council will have a general approach – hopefully – by June. Because the Eurovignette or the single European sky are the kind of things which will make a difference in road transport or improving the efficiency of air traffic. And this will have a concrete impact on sustainability and on the reduction of emissions or on internalising the externalities in road transport.
Road  safety was mentioned. Of course, road safety has to be at the core of our activity. And what we are going to propose, or work on, is a safe system, which is an integrated approach towards safety in transport. Because, as was mentioned by several people here, there are so many elements which together constitute the environment for safety in transport. All this needs to be taken into account. 
All the ideas I heard are very good. And the last word would be on the fact that all the industries in connection with transport as such are the backbone of our economy. We need to make it more sustainable and smart, but keep in mind that it is competitive and it has to remain as such. And for this industry – as it was mentioned – we need measures which are predictable so people will know, investors will know, what it coming  so they can plan in advance for 10 or 20 years. 
I also had some particular questions from Mr Schulze on low-emission zones or the harmonising of vignette systems. This is something we are working on. Because the idea of having low-emission zones is good. Yes it is, but it is true that for people moving around not knowing the system is a deterrent or an obstacle. So what we are looking at is to propose a harmonisation of these systems for urban areas. For the Eurovignette, we have already said that we would like to support the Eurovignette. 
The question on inland waterways raised by Mr Băsescu: inland waterways need to become the new big thing because I think they are underused. You are absolutely right, because inland waterways together with transport with rail are the most sustainable modes we have. And new progress on inland waterways is needed in terms of sustainability of the ports and the vessels and new intelligent traffic systems. All these are there, we are looking into them.
And you are right that the Danube Commission, which is 70 years old – or something similar, you know would know better – has a different regulation. But I promise you, we are going to look into harmonisation. I think because they are non-EU members it is not easy but it is absolutely needed. So thank you very much for the suggestion.
So this would be, honourable Members, in a nutshell, my reaction to your comments. I trust that you will get involved in the work on such a sustainable transport system for the future. And, Madam President, consider this my invitation to you to contribute to this work. So thank you very much and I hope will have new occasions to go more in depth on each of the subjects touched upon this evening."};"There is no mention of electric vehicles in the provided speech. The speaker discusses various topics related to transport, such as:

* TEN-T infrastructure
* Alternative fuels infrastructure and alternative fuels
* Aviation and maritime transport
* Railway signalling
* Eurovignette
* Road safety
* Inland waterways

However, there is no mention of electric vehicles or any specific measures related to them. The speech focuses on the broader topics of sustainable transport, infrastructure development, and regulatory frameworks, but does not specifically address electric vehicles."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2020-01-29_25-46";"Julie Lechanteux";"ID";"
    In writing. - The Commission's proposals on mobility and transport for a reduction in CO2 emissions by 2030 are very ambitious, but we must look at reality. That is what I did last November when I visited Lyon and the largest international exhibition of road and urban transport solutions, Solutrans, where I was able to exchange with professionals from the road freight transport sector, the backbone of our economy. Today, 98% of industrial vehicles sold in France run on diesel. For a change in model, measures will have to be adopted. We must support companies in converting their fleet, whether electric, gas or hydrogen. Investment is needed in charging infrastructure development, help financially the communities and individual entrepreneurs, adapt regulations on total authorized circulation weight for ecological vehicles, promote the circulation of zero-emission vehicles in urban areas, promote dynamic charging systems, encourage long-distance charging projects and finally, develop training for new professions in this area. Here are concrete solutions!"};"According to the speech, the following points are mentioned related to electric vehicles:

1. **Support for companies converting their fleet**: The speaker mentions that measures will have to be adopted to support companies in converting their fleet to electric vehicles.
2. **Investment in charging infrastructure development**: Investment is needed to develop charging infrastructure for electric vehicles.
3. **Promote circulation of zero-emission vehicles in urban areas**: The speaker suggests promoting the circulation of zero-emission vehicles, including electric vehicles, in urban areas.

These are the specific points mentioned about electric vehicles in the text."};0;0;0;0;1;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;
"2020-01-29_25-47";"Rovana Plumb";"S&D";"in writing. – Transport and mobility services employ around 11 million people, and the demand for mobility today is higher than ever. However, transport today generates air pollution, noise, congestion and road accidents. The sector already represents almost a quarter of Europe’s greenhouse gas emissions and its emission footprint is rising. We need to prioritise clean and affordable alternatives, with an objective to have only zero emission vehicles on EU roads and make the best use of digital technologies to help reduce fuel consumption. Likewise, the EU’s satellite navigation systems contribute to reducing emissions, for instance in aviation and road transport. As part of this new strategy, the cities and citizens have an important role to play, through sustainable urban planning and addressing mobility demands and infrastructure. Urban areas should also be assisted in digitisation, automation and other innovative solutions and should pursue active and shared transport, from more walking and cycling to car-sharing services and car-pooling. More can and should be done from using recycled content in vehicles and transport infrastructure to reaching more circularity. For example, increasing the collection and recycling rates of electric car batteries in the EU could reduce dependence on imported raw-materials and help to retain the value of recovered materials in the EU economy."};"According to the speech, there are two points related to electric vehicles mentioned:

1. The goal is to have only zero-emission vehicles on EU roads, which implies that electric vehicles will play a significant role in achieving this objective.
2. Increasing the collection and recycling rates of electric car batteries in the EU could reduce dependence on imported raw materials and help retain the value of recovered materials in the EU economy.

These are the only two points mentioned about electric vehicles in the text."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;
"2020-01-30_2-27";"Miriam Dalli";"S&D";"
    Sinjura President, fill the vacancies, even in the future there will be more Socialists and Democrats, we must ensure that they are also aware of the work of the European Commission, which deals with social, economic and environmental issues.
    You do not have a proper Senate that fills the gaps in the transformation process that we need and that you have promised. That is why we are not against filling any vacancies. The political decisions made by this Senate must be focused on the economy that will benefit the European Member States and strive to create an environment conducive to technological investment. We also want the European Member States to decide on new policies and technology.
    It is important that we do not insist on serious politics that hinder innovation, invest in renewable energy industries, efficiency in energy consumption, public transport, electric cars that do not pollute ports and airports that will be closed and opened only when necessary.
    So that we can reduce the burden of funds and investment through a fund for the elderly, for regions and for those who will leave the industry that will be more environmentally friendly in the future for the benefit of the elderly, the regions and the families of our country. This is the future, which must be aware of the needs of the people and strive to create an environment conducive to the well-being of our families."};"According to the speech, it is mentioned that ""electric cars that do not pollute"" are part of the vision for the future. This suggests that the speaker is advocating for the adoption of electric vehicles as a cleaner alternative to traditional fossil fuel-based transportation. The phrase ""ports and airports that will be closed and opened only when necessary"" may imply that these infrastructure hubs will be designed with sustainability in mind, possibly incorporating electric vehicle charging stations or other eco-friendly features. Overall, the mention of electric cars is part of a broader vision for a more environmentally friendly future."};0;0;1;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2020-02-13_3-23";"Jan Huitema";"Renew";"
    Chairman, for decades we have had a common agricultural policy that does not work well at the moment. The European Court of Auditors is very critical about it. Why is that?
    The environmental measures we have in the common agricultural policy are made generic here in Brussels and farmers simply have to implement them. They only test whether the farmer actually carries out that measure. There is no looking at all at what the actual result is.
    I am very pleased that the previous Commission has proposed to start testing on the actual result, to give farmers the space to do things they are good at, namely entrepreneurship and innovation, to ensure they are motivated and to stimulate entrepreneurship in order to actually get the greening off the ground, and to also reward the delivered results of farmers in a good way. Then it works. Look for example at how electric cars have become incredibly popular all over Europe. That has gone exactly the same way.
    What I am now very afraid of is that with this ""Farm to Fork"" strategy we go back to the old policy, where we only introduce Brussels top-down measures that farmers cannot get off the ground at all. Include the objectives of the Green Deal in the common agricultural policy. Focus on results. Reward for results.
    What we have to do in a Farm-to-Fork strategy is look at rules that do not work. It is ridiculous, for example, that insect meal is still not allowed to be used in animal feed. It is ridiculous that there are very few alternatives for low-risk substances for crop protection. It is ridiculous that artificial fertilizer is still promoted in the nitrate directive compared to animal manure. And it is ridiculous that innovations in the field of plant breeding still cannot be realized."};"According to the speech, electric cars have become incredibly popular all over Europe. This is mentioned as an example of how something can work well when it is done correctly, implying that the previous approach to promoting electric vehicles was successful. The speaker uses this analogy to argue that a similar approach should be taken with the common agricultural policy, focusing on results and rewarding farmers for their achievements rather than simply introducing top-down measures from Brussels."};0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2020-04-16_17-2";"Ursula von der Leyen";"NA";" Madam President of the Commission. - Mr. President of Parliament, Mr. President of the Council, Members of Parliament, we do not have enough words to talk about the pain of Europe and the suffering of the world. We think of all the victims and we pray for all the grieving families. We pledge to tell their story, honor their lives, and their memory. We will always remember each one of them.
    We will remember Julie, the young Frenchwoman with her whole life ahead of her, and Yann, the Czech historian who fought for his values, or Gino, the retired Italian doctor who came back to save others' lives. We will remember Suzanne's incredible act in Belgium, leaving her respirator for younger patients, and Francis saying goodbye to his brother through a hospital window in Ireland. We will remember the Polish mother who will not see her baby grow up and the young Spanish football coach whose dream will never come true.
    We will never forget the mothers, fathers, sisters and brothers, the young and the elderly from north or south, east or west, friends and colleagues, neighbors and strangers further away, those who have things to say and things to see, those on whose shoulders we cry and depend on for love. Each of these thousands of stories breaks a small piece of our heart but strengthens our determination for Europe to do everything possible to save as many lives as possible.
    You cannot overcome a pandemic of this speed and this scale without the truth. The truth about everything: the numbers, the science, the outlook - but also about our own actions. Yes, it is true that no one was really ready for this. And yes, too many were not there on time when Italy needed a helping hand at the very beginning. And yes, for that, it is right that Europe as a whole offers a heartfelt apology. But saying sorry only counts for something if it changes behavior, and the truth is, it did not take long before everyone realized that we must protect each other to protect ourselves.
    The truth is that Europe has now become the world's beating heart of solidarity. The true Europe is standing up: the one that is there for each other when it is needed the most. The one where paramedics from Poland and doctors from Romania save lives in Italy. Where ventilators from Germany provide a lifeline in Spain. Where hospitals in Czechia treat the sick from France. And where patients from Bergamo are flown to clinics in Bonn.
    We have seen medical supplies go from Lithuania to Spain and respirators go from Denmark to Italy. In fact, we have seen every piece of equipment go in every direction across Europe, from whoever can spare it to whoever needs it. This makes me proud to be European.
    Of course, there are still some who want to point fingers and deflect blame. And there are others who would rather talk like populists than tell unpopular truths. To this I say: 'Stop it - stop and have the courage to tell the truth. Have the courage to stand up for Europe'. Because this Union of ours will get us through. But it will only be as strong tomorrow as we make it today. And if you need inspiration, just look at the way the people of Europe are standing together - with empathy, humility and humanity.
    And I pay tribute to all of them. To the delivery drivers and the food suppliers. The shopkeepers, the factory packers and the balcony clappers. The companies changing their production lines to make the supplies we urgently need. I pay tribute to the Portuguese volunteers sewing masks for their neighbors, or the seven-year-old Greek pianist who composed an 'isolation waltz' to keep people going.  Above all else, I thank and pay tribute to our heroes: the medics, the nurses, the careworkers. They are the ones with bruises on their faces and tragic images in their minds. The ones holding the hands of the sick as softly and as lovingly as the families that cannot be there. They are the ones saving our lives and saving our honour. The ones we must protect so that they can protect us all.
     And now, focusing on this above all else, we are building a common stockpile of medical supplies. We are investing together in research for vaccines. We are centrally coordinating the procurement of the most urgently needed goods on the global market. And that's why we have put together a team of the best experts from across Europe, who regularly share their knowledge, which can save lives.
     For this reason, we waive customs duties and value-added tax on the import of medical equipment from non-EU countries. And that is also the reason why we made a simple but significant promise at the beginning of this month: We will use every available euro to save lives and protect the basic living conditions of Europeans in any way possible. That is why we have proposed redirecting all remaining funds of the current budget into an emergency program. As a result, almost 3 billion euros can be directly channeled where they are needed: in new ventilators and protective equipment, more tests and more medical care for the most vulnerable, including those waiting in refugee camps.
     For this reason, we propose that every available euro from the European Structural and Investment Funds be used to tackle the corona crisis. This means that we are giving full flexibility: The funds can be used in other regions. They can be used anywhere where they are most urgently needed, regardless of the usual restrictions such as co-financing, purpose limitation or upper limits. With this package, which will be voted on by this house today, Europe is going to the limits of its capabilities.
     And the same principle applies to protecting people's livelihoods. Europe has had economic crises before. But we have never had an economic shutdown like this. Nobody is to blame and everybody will need support. We need unprecedented measures to do this and to make sure our economy is ready to bounce forward as soon as possible.
     And here again, the truth matters. Europe has done more in the last four weeks than it did in the first four years of the last crisis.
     We have made our state aid rules more flexible than ever. In the last few days alone, we have approved schemes that will provide EUR 1 billion to Croatian businesses, EUR 1.2 billion for Greek SMEs or EUR 20 million to Portuguese fishermen. There are many more examples I could pick, from Latvia and Estonia to Belgium or Sweden.
     For the first time in our history, we triggered the full flexibility in the Stability and Growth Pact. Along with bold measures taken by the European Central Bank, this provides unprecedented fiscal and financial power. And last week's decision by EU finance means a further EUR 500 billion will be available to all of those who need it.
     As part of this, I urge all Member States to make the most of SURE – the new scheme proposed by the Commission to protect Europeans against the risk of unemployment. It will provide EUR 100 billion to help governments make up the difference if your employer has reduced your hours or if you are self-employed and need support.
     The beauty of SURE is two-fold. First, it will help those in need to pay their rents, bills or food, and keep other businesses alive in the process. And second, it is the definition of European solidarity. The Member States that can, will put up guarantees so others can support the hardest hit in their countries.  As a result of all this action, Europe's collective response is well above EUR 3 trillion. This is the most impressive response anywhere in the world. But we know we will need more. A lot more. Because this will be a long haul, and the world of tomorrow will look very different from that of yesterday.
    I am convinced that Europe can shape this new world if it works together and rediscovers its pioneering spirit. And for this, I want to cite a sentence from the Ventotene Manifesto, written by two of Italy and Europe’s greatest visionaries: Ernesto Rossi and Altiero Spinelli, one of our founding fathers.
    Writing from their prison on a remote island, at the height of the war, when all hope of a united Europe seemed lost, they gave us these words of confidence: ‘the moment has arrived in which we must know how to discard old burdens, how to be ready for the new world that is coming, that will be so different from what we have imagined’.
    Dear friends, this moment has arrived once again. The moment to put behind us the old divisions, disputes and recriminations. To come out of our entrenched positions. The moment to be ready for that new world. To use all the power of our common spirit and the strength of our shared purposes.
    The starting point for this must be making our economies, societies and way of life more sustainable and resilient. Finding the answers in this new world will require courage, trust and solidarity. And it will need massive investment to jump-start our economies. We need a Marshall Plan for Europe’s recovery, and it needs to be put in place immediately.
    There's only one instrument we have that is trusted by all Member States, which is already in place and can deliver quickly. It is transparent and it is time-tested as an instrument for cohesion, convergence and investment. And that is the European budget.
    The European budget will be the mothership of our recovery. And for that reason, the next seven-year budget must be different to what we have imagined, just as Spinelli said. We will use the power of the whole European budget to leverage the huge amount of investment we need to rebuild the Single Market after corona.
    We will frontload it so we can power that investment in those crucial first years of recovery. Because this crisis is different from any other one we have known. It is severely hitting completely healthy companies because public life has shutdown.
    And this is why we will need innovative solutions and more headroom in the MFF so it can unlock massive public and private investment. This will kick-start our economies and drive our recovery towards a more resilient, green and digital Europe.
    By that, we not only support but reshape our industries and services towards a new reality. It will mean investing in our digital technologies, infrastructure and in innovation, such as 3D printing, to help us to be more independent and make the most of new opportunities.
    And it also means doubling down on our growth strategy by investing in the European Green Deal. As the global recovery picks up, global warming will not slow down. First-mover advantage will count double and finding the right projects to invest in will be key.
    A more modern and circular economy will make us less dependent and boost our resilience. And this is the lesson we need to learn from this crisis.
    Investing in large-scale renovation, renewables, clean transport, sustainable food and nature restoration will be even more important than before. This is not only good for our economies, it is not only good for our environment, but it will reduce dependencies by shortening and diversifying supply chains. 
    And we also need to keep another reality in mind. While the crisis is symmetric, recovery is not. Because not only the virus hits but also the economic shock. Some regions will bounce back and others will have a harder time. And therefore, cohesion and convergence will be more important than ever before. The single market and cohesion policy are the two sides of the same coin. You need both to ensure prosperity across the whole European Union.
    This is the Europe that I believe can emerge from this crisis. One that does everything it can to protect lives and livelihoods. One that is open to the world but can take care of itself. One that is more resilient, green and digital and that invests in its future together. This is the path to recovery. It will be a long road and the whole world will be trying to find its way.
    This crisis will likely redefine our politics, our geopolitics and possibly globalisation itself. And in this new world, Europe will need to stick together through thick and thin. And as I look around in our Union and I see all that humanity and that ingenuity, I know that we can and we will do just that.
    They say a strong soul shines bright after every storm. If we all stand up for Europe today – with courage, trust and solidarity – I know that tomorrow Europe’s soul will shine brighter than ever before.
    Long live Europe. Vive l’Europe. Lang Leben Europa."};"There is no mention of electric vehicles in the provided speech. The text discusses various topics such as the European Union's response to the COVID-19 pandemic, economic crises, state aid rules, the European budget, and the need for investment in sustainable and resilient economies. However, electric vehicles are not mentioned at all."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2020-05-27_9-14";"Valerie Hayer";"Renew";" – Mr. President, Madam President, dear colleagues, this proposal is a major breakthrough due to the loan it proposes.
    However, I will be direct: frankly, we are still wondering where the money is to finance this relaunch, but we all know where that money is. That money is with Google, with Amazon and with Facebook. That money is with all these multinational companies practicing tax optimization. Let them bear the burden of this loan. The same goes for the large Chinese industries that pollute and have nothing to do with our standards.
    Finally, have the courage to use this weapon which are own resources and let's do it now, not in 2024. Once this money is collected, we can give a new breath to our project: electric cars, well-insulated housing, a return of our outsourced jobs.
    Madam President, Mr. Commissioner, dear colleagues, this virus does not only spread death, it also spreads despair. Let's avoid the fatal outcome and give Europe the greatness that citizens aspire to.
    Thank you for this proposal, our demands are complementary."};"According to the speech, it is mentioned that ""electric cars"" will be one of the areas that can benefit from the collected money. The speaker suggests that once the money is collected, it can be used to give a ""new breath"" to the project, which includes electric cars, well-insulated housing, and a return of outsourced jobs. This implies that the speaker sees electric vehicles as an important part of the project's relaunch and a way to revitalize the economy."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;
"2020-05-27_9-64";"Alfred Sant";"S&D";"in writing. – One welcomes the objectives and thrust of the EU recovery package, aimed at relaunching the European economy in the wake of the COVID—19 pandemic. The highlight of this package is the Recovery Fund. The proposal that a large percentage of the funding will be in grants is positive. Its integration into the Multiannual Financial Framework also makes sense. Still the question remains: will the proposed rise of the GNI Own Resources ceiling be enough to cover the envisaged requirements? Some economic forecasts seem to make this quite doubtful. Then more crudely: who will exactly benefit from the envisaged recovery plan? Will the multiple goals that are inbuilt into its proposed design skew benefits towards particular regions or sectors, at the expense of others? For instance: in response to Green Deal exigencies, significant resources will apply to the promotion of clean energy applications, like the creation of a million charging stations for electric cars. Naturally producers of the latter, mainly located in two Member States, will benefit most from this. Care will have to be taken to ensure that the recovery plan, positive as it is, does not serve to widen instead of narrow existing divergences between different regions of the Union."};"According to the speech, significant resources will be applied to promote clean energy applications, specifically:

* The creation of a million charging stations for electric cars.

This initiative is mentioned as a response to the Green Deal exigencies. It is also noted that producers of electric cars, mainly located in two Member States, will benefit most from this initiative."};0;0;0;0;1;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;
"2020-06-17_30-2";"Adina-Ioana Vălean";"NA";" Member of the Commission. – Mr President, thank you very much for inviting the Commission for this debate to discuss what is of course on the mind of everyone nowadays. The vision of the Commission for the recovery of tourism and transport, as we gradually emerge on the other side of the Coronavirus pandemic. I am sincerely happy to be back with you.
As the summer holidays approach, it is clear that we need to consider transport and tourism together. How would we physically go on holiday if no trains, boats, planes or cars were moving, or indeed moving across borders? 
However, getting the economy moving requires people moving too, and that requires trust and coordination. What we need to offer citizens is clarity, non-discrimination and seamless connectivity. 
We all know too well that the transport and tourism sectors have been the hardest hit by the pandemic, and particularly passenger transport. Traffic across modes has been down by at least 80% compared to the previous year. Transport is a vital enabler for many sectors, including tourism, and ensures the transport of goods that we all depend upon. It is in fact the backbone of the single market and economic activity as such. So restoring transport in the EU and beyond must be accelerated, while keeping health requirements in mind. 
Our guidelines of 13 May set out a common framework for the progressive and safe restoration of transport services and connectivity. They provide general principles applicable to all transport services and specific recommendations for each transport mode. We have also proposed guidelines on the safe resumption of tourism services across the entire ecosystem, such as in hotels and restaurants, or for tour operators. 
Additional guidelines were presented for restoring free movement and for making vouchers more attractive. With these guidelines we have all the necessary tools at hand to restart with this important part of our economy, as of now, well ahead of the economically so important summer of 2020.
No endeavour can ever be risk free. However, our guidelines and the protocols developed by our agencies take all precautionary measures and provide the best available practices for reducing risks, all while making the resumption of passenger transport possible.
These guidelines should be complemented by widespread information about the measures taken, so that each European can make responsible and well-informed decisions about how to limit health risks while travelling. 
Any measures imposed in the transport sector have to be proportionate and risk-based. It is very important that Member States are, as of this week, leaving the general transport bans or internal borders restrictions behind and favour instead more targeted measures. This means increasing cleaning, using protective equipment, prioritising electronic ticketing or avoiding crowding in hubs. Cumulatively, these targeted measures can provide the much needed trust for people to restart travelling.
Because of the unique nature of aviation, the EU Aviation Safety Agency and the European Centre for Disease Control have published additional operational recommendations based on the Commission’s general guidelines. It clarifies that a number of appropriate measures should be taken. This can, in conjunction with inbuilt features in aircraft, such as hospital grade filters, permit the reduction of risks to acceptable levels.
Acting together is key, since transport is by nature a cross-regional and cross-border activity. It goes without saying that restoring links must always be coordinated, in particular we need to ensure that any measures applied at points of arrival and departure are mutually acceptable, otherwise travel will become prohibitively burdensome, expensive and in some cases impossible. 
In this regard, we will also continue our good cooperation with Member States through our network of transport contact points established at the beginning of the COVID-19 crisis in the context of the Green Lanes guidelines.
Safety is not the only thing needed to inspire trust. Trust is also built on precedent and the precedent we wanted to defend is that consumers should be protected in the EU at all times. The Commission has been clear throughout this crisis that the rights of passengers to reimbursement shall not be restricted. Consumers, especially those who have been hit economically by the crisis, will only get back to travelling for leisure and tourism if they can rest assured that their travel packages and flights are to be reimbursed if cancelled.
In addition to all that, resuming passenger transport and tourism requires business continuity for all the sectors. Securing working capital, funding of operations, public support for businesses to maintain investment pipelines are all vital economic prerequisites for regaining connectivity and building a transport system that is fit for the future. 
The Commission has therefore proposed a robust and comprehensive package for the recovery of the EU economy. Although specific economic sectors do not have ring-fenced funding in the recovery package, it is clear that those economic ecosystems, such as transport and tourism, will be able to benefit from several funding opportunities.
I therefore seek your support in adopting this package swiftly. It provides a unique window of opportunity for funding in transport, tourism, automotive, aeronautics, and ship manufacturing, as well as all other industries needed to ensure sustainable, resilient and affordable connectivity for 2020 and beyond. 
I will devote all my efforts in convincing Member States and private stakeholders in using the EU instruments available, to increase liquidity and to get firmly on a recovery path.
The Commission’s proposed recovery package to kick-start the European economy contains an array of opportunities for transport under the EUR 1.1 thousand billion MFF and the EUR 750 billion in the Next Generation EU programme.
The recovery package includes a reinforced budget for the Connecting Europe facility, with an additional EUR 1.5 billion for the general envelope to stimulate further infrastructure investment. It will accelerate the completion of the Core TEN-T network due by 2030. It will stimulate the Digital and Green Transition with clear priority given to the most decarbonised modes, rail and inland navigation, and it will accelerate the deployment of clean technologies such as alternative fuel infrastructure, in line with our Green Deal agenda. 
We are also proposing an enhanced InvestEU with an increased budget of EUR 31.6 billion. This will include a new Strategic Investment Facility, the InvestEU’s fifth window to support critical infrastructure and the development of resilient value chains, including for new clean technologies that are essential for the transport sector. 
In addition, the sustainable infrastructure window has almost doubled in size in our proposal and now has a EUR 20 billion guarantee which can stimulate private investment in sustainable transport infrastructure and fleet renewal. 
With a total budget of EUR 560 billion the recovery and resilience facility can benefit all sectors of the economy, including transport. Member States will submit their plans — recovery and resilience plans — by April next year in order to receive grants or loans. I am sure that investment in sustainable transport systems will be high on the recovery agenda of Member States, as this is mentioned in almost all country reports of the EU Semester on which the national plans will have to be based. 
Of course there is also the solvency support instrument under the European Fund for Strategic Investment with EUR 26 billion which can mobilise additional private capital to support eligible companies in the sectors most impacted by the Coronavirus.
All these instruments will continue to support our priorities of sustainability and digitalisation — the focus of our upcoming Strategy in Transport communication. The Coronavirus changed a lot, but not the need for smarter sustainable mobility. 80% of the CEF budget for transport is already contributing to climate action. For the entire MFF and the Next Generation EU we propose an overall target of 25% climate mainstreaming. For transport it could be even higher. 
I would like to conclude by commending you for the European Parliament resolution highlighting many of the challenges and solutions taken. As we look forward, we are of course learning lessons from our experiences over the last few months. The situation was unprecedented, and I would dare to say that we are now wiser and better prepared. I am looking forward to your questions and comments. Thank you very much."};"There is no mention of electric vehicles in the provided speech. The text only discusses general guidelines for the restoration of transport services, including aviation, rail, inland navigation, and other modes of transportation, as well as the importance of sustainability and digitalization in the transport sector. It also mentions the need to reduce risks and ensure trust among citizens while traveling, but does not specifically mention electric vehicles or any related technologies."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2020-06-17_30-7";"Tilly Metz";"Greens/EFA";"
    On behalf of the Verts/ALE faction. – Mr. President, dear Madam Commissioner! Following the COVID-19 lockdown measures, we must ensure a safe, sustainable and coordinated reopening of the tourism and transport sectors.
    I welcome the guidelines and recommendations of the Commission in this regard. Let us also look to the future to prepare for the transport and tourism we want in the future. The climate crisis will not disappear with the end of the pandemic, and the transport and tourism sector must make its contribution to reducing our ecological footprint.
    The crisis has taught us that societies and people can drastically change their habits. We have stayed at home, stopped flying, and started cycling more and walking more. We now have a unique opportunity to redefine the concept of tourism and invest in sustainable transport modes such as trains - especially night trains - and cycling infrastructure, as well as promoting agricultural ecology and rural development in the context of tourism.
    I call for a plan for sustainable tourism in Europe, thus creating a win-win-win situation: good working conditions, full coffers for providers, a healthy environment - and therefore a safe travel experience for travelers."};"There is no mention of electric vehicles in the provided speech. The text only mentions sustainable transport modes such as trains, cycling infrastructure, and promoting agricultural ecology and rural development in the context of tourism. Electric vehicles are not mentioned at all."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2020-07-23_8-5";"Ursula von der Leyen";"NA";"
    President of the Commission. – Six hundred thousand... Six hundred thousand victims of this killer virus! Six hundred thousand lives cut short too soon! Six hundred thousand stories written only halfway! 600,000 incomplete families today! These six hundred thousand people will always remain present in our memories and in our hearts.
    And we know that it's not over yet, unfortunately...
    Behind this sad procession, we see the terrible impact on our economy. Our citizens, our workers, our businesses, everyone is suffering and fighting back.
    This pandemic hit us at the beginning of the year, and let's remember those days, those rising curves of patients, the number of deaths that increased, the divisions between our countries that threatened! We have heard painful criticisms, words that divided North and South, East and West, debates on ""corona obligations"" that ended with clenched fists and pointed fingers.
    The situation was bleak and the options were few. And the rare solutions put on the table were intergovernmental, that is to say outside the European framework, without a community method, without a European Parliament, and I remind you, we were also without an agreement on our European budget, two years after our proposal!
    That's why the European Commission has made a European proposal to avoid past reflexes and mistakes. A European proposal for a European relaunch.
    We all know that Europe is not out of the woods yet. But Europe can now see the dawn turning into light. This week, not only have taboos and perceptions been cast aside, but one big watershed for our Union has been crossed. By standing united - 27 Member States backing the Commission - we raise money on the capital market to fight the worst economic crisis ever - together.
    In Next Generation EU, we now have a unique recovery tool worth EUR 750 billion. EUR 750 billion to support the hardest hit. EUR 750 billion to boost our Single Market. EUR 750 billion to invest in the European Green Deal, digitization and modernization of our single market and resilience.
    Of course, 27 countries agreeing something on this scale - and of this unique nature - is a challenge. It takes courage, political will and, of course, give and take. It was never going to be easy. But, anything worth having is always worth fighting for!
    And I thank you, Charles, for the excellent cooperation and trustworthy management - thank you very much for that.
    And look at how far Europe's fighting spirit has taken us. It is not long ago that some asked for no grants - loans only. But today we have an agreement that Next Generation EU will have EUR 390 billion in grants, topped by EUR 360 billion in loans. And yes, there are fewer grants than the Commission and the Parliament argued for, but from where we started, this is an enormous achievement.  And this is big enough to make an enormous difference.
    It will invest in reforms linked to our European priorities, in line with our country-specific recommendations. And, because this is a European investment in our European Union, it is essential that the European Parliament plays a key role. As co-legislator, this House will have its full say on the design of the Facility and how it works.
    The Commission will ensure full transparency, including through standing ready for a structured dialogue on priorities and expenditure, and a regular exchange of views on national plans and overall implementation. 
    And this is how, together, we can ensure that Next Generation EU delivers where it really matters. This is also how we can ensure that Next Generation EU accelerates the twin green and digital transformation. 30% of Next Generation EU and our MFF will be spent on climate-related projects and, if we get it right, I believe that Next Generation EU can be one of the largest stimulus for investment and reforms anywhere in the world – investing in the rollout of 5G, grid infrastructure, in AI and industrial digitisation, in renewables, sustainable transport, energy-efficient buildings, you name it! This is how we fight climate change and modernise.
    This stimulus will also support much needed structural reforms to make us more resilient. And, we will have a Just Transition Fund to support those people, those regions and sectors who have indeed a bigger step to take.
    As you know, I would have liked more. But this week’s agreement ensures a 125% increase in the size of the Just Transition Fund – now worth EUR 17.5 billion – and that will make a real difference on the ground.
    The big winner of this summit are the new own resources. We have now a unanimous agreement on the need for new own resources. We have a clear timetable and we have them linked to repayment. This is a huge and historic step forward for our Union, which both the Commission and the Parliament have long being pushing for.
    Now we have no time to waste. The Commission will come forward with a package of new own resources. This will include a digital levy. We will also put forward a carbon border adjustment mechanism and an extension of the Emission Trading System. The two go hand in hand.
    We need to put a price on carbon in all key sectors of the economy at home and we need to avoid carbon leakage from elsewhere to make sure that we are sustainable and competitive.
    Allow me to come to another issue, which is at the heart of what our Union is all about: our values. These values – including the respect for the rule of law – are the very foundation of our Union. These values they are mandatory and they are priceless.
    The European Council has stated a clear commitment in respecting the rule of law and protecting our financial interests. And I not only strongly welcome this – also because it is of utmost importance with even more public money on the table than ever before with Next Generation EU – but against this background, the Commission will now follow up. We will look into our 2018 proposal on the rule of law. We will work together with the co-legislators to ensure that our 2018 proposal is taken forward and where necessary, improved. Protecting our budget and the respect for the rule of law, go hand in hand. And we must also do everything we can to protect European money by stepping up the fight against fraud. This means having the right controls in place, including a database that puts us in the position to know who the final beneficiaries of EU funding are, and we will work closely with the Parliament to make this happen in the next weeks and months.
    I started by saying that the European Council’s agreement provided the light at the end of the tunnel. But with light also comes shadow. And in this case, the shadow is in the form of a very lean long-term EU budget. There are regrettable and painful decisions on many programmes, which have crucial European added value. I am thinking of Horizon, our essential Health Programme, of InvestEU. Yes, all these have been increased, but certainly not as much as we would have liked. And I believe the size of our external funds, in particular, is really concerning and we should always remember that the value of EU programmes far outweigh their costs.
    Yes, we managed to avoid even further cuts – as some Member States wanted – but this MFF is a difficult pill to swallow and I know this House feels the same way.
(Applause) 
    And here again, we should also take a step back and look at where we are coming from. Before we even started, this budget had a hole of around EUR 70 billion because of Brexit, with one big Member State less contributing. The good news is that we have managed to plug almost all of that gap. That means that every country has to pay more. And when you put Next Generation EU on top, we now have a massive and unprecedented financial firepower of EUR 1.8 trillion. That is almost 13% of our EU 27 GNI. And then, MFF and Next Generation EU together, will increase the percentage of modern policies to over 50%. Just look around the world to see who else can say the same as us.
    My ladies and gentlemen! We now have the opportunity to achieve something historic for Europe. The pressure of the crisis has opened doors that had been closed for a very long time. So sad is the occasion, it is also a new chance for Europe, for our community.
    Ten years ago, in the financial and euro crisis, we did save the Union and the Euro from collapse, but the inner price was gigantic: Our economies developed counteractively. Young people had to leave their home in search of work and future, blame games between states grew, and the rifts are visible and tangible to this day. This time, we do many things differently and, as I believe, some better.
    750 billion euros – the overwhelming majority as a top-up – is a great signal of solidarity and reform readiness. But Next Generation EU means much more than money. In previous crises, member states avoided European institutions - also out of mistrust. That meant back then no consultation and no influence for the European Parliament.
    This time it's different. This time we opt for a community solution, also because the Commission has actively committed itself and convinced with a smart proposal. Thanks to Next Generation EU, all member states are now equally able to help their people and businesses in crisis without suffocating public finances.
    And because Next Generation EU is based on the method of co-decision, it will heal wounds and bring us together. This time we take responsibility for the fate of Europe and the future prospects of our children on all our broad shoulders. That is a burden we carry with responsibility and pride. Long live Europe! Long live Europe! Vive l'Europe! (Applause)"};"There is no mention of electric vehicles in the provided speech. The text only discusses topics related to the European Union, such as budget, rule of law, fraud, external funds, and solidarity among member states. It does not contain any information or references to electric vehicles."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2020-10-06_11-64";"Maria Spyraki";"EPP";" – Madam President, ladies and gentlemen, dear colleagues, Vice-President Timmermans, today we are all taking a historic step that is based on robust scientific data and leads humanity towards the restoration of the planet's balance, while at the same time restructuring our economy and changing the habits of us all. The citizens of Carditsa, Fthiotida, Macedonia, Crete know better than anyone else how great the need is to address climate change, promote sustainable development, organic food, sustainable transport, changes in buildings, new innovative treatments in pharmaceuticals. It is now the time for this step to be made a reality so that the goal for 2030 is based on
  A study is being conducted on the effects and to take into account the effects of the pandemic and the corona virus. 
    Any high ambition runs the risk of not being credible and at the same time creating expectations among citizens that we cannot meet. This step must include green digital investments and jobs to address the gap. Citizens in North Macedonia and Megalopolis, dear Governor, have their eyes on this, looking to us to guide and fund the projects so that no one is left behind. This step must be implemented immediately by all member states with strong support. It is our duty today to give Europe's citizens and the global community a realistic, modern legislative framework.  Climate change platform."};"There is no mention of electric vehicles in the provided speech. The text only mentions ""sustainable transport"" as one of the areas that need to be addressed, but it does not specify what type of transportation or technology should be used. Therefore, there is no summary to provide regarding electric vehicles."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2020-10-06_11-70";"Magdalena Adamowicz";"EPP";"
    In writing. – European climate law is a legal act that sets the course for the European Union's journey towards full climate neutrality no later than 2050. This is not an easy process. Many are worried about the competitiveness of our companies, maintaining jobs, and the possible increase in product and service prices. For Poland, this is a particularly great challenge due to the very high share of coal in electricity and heat production. However, radical emission reduction of greenhouse gases is absolutely necessary to prevent a climate catastrophe. It's no longer a question of whether, but when and how to achieve this goal. 
    There is no doubt that we must fight for the climate today on many fronts, and achieving climate neutrality will not be solely due to European climate law. The European Commission has already announced, among other things, a revision and expansion of the EU emissions trading system, tightening CO2 emission standards for road vehicles, further support for the development of electromobility, improvement of energy efficiency policy and renewable energy policy. These actions are necessary to achieve the decarbonization of the European economy. However, it is also important to provide appropriate financial support - at least within the framework of EU cohesion policy and the Just Transition Fund. Only  Then it will be possible to reconcile climate protection with the socio-economic challenges we face today."};"According to the speech, the European Commission has announced ""further support for the development of electromobility"" as one of the actions necessary to achieve the decarbonization of the European economy.

In other words, the text mentions that the EU is planning to provide additional support for the growth and development of electric vehicles (electromobility) in order to reduce greenhouse gas emissions."};0;1;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2020-10-22_7-2";"Kadri Simson";"NA";" Member of the Commission. – Mr President, I am honoured to present to you today the State of the Energy Union Report. Every year, it’s an opportunity to take stock of our energy policy and assess whether we are on track with implementing the energy union.
The 2020 report is the first one since we launched our new sustainability and growth strategy, the European Green Deal. A well-functioning energy union is the necessary basis to deliver our climate commitment by 2050. Together with this report, I presented three key initiatives on 14 October: the renovation wave, the methane strategy and the Commission recommendations on energy poverty. The initiatives of the 14 October energy package are important stepping stones to reach our 2030 climate target plan. They will make sure that we seize the significant decarbonisation potential of buildings and address energy poverty in order not to leave anybody behind in the clean energy transition. 
National energy and climate plans (NECPs) will also remain an important tool in achieving the minimum 55% reduction in greenhouse gases. Together with the State of the Energy Union, we also published a detailed assessment of the plans of each Member State. The final NECPs are complete, robust and ambitious. Our analysis shows that each Member State still has some work to do, especially on energy efficiency. But overall we are heading in the right direction and the plans demonstrate that Europe can meet ambitious climate targets. The Commission will ensure a clear and inclusive follow—up of those plans, including on the progress of implementation and the need to revise the level of ambition of NECPs to reflect a higher carbon emission reduction target for 2030.
Let me now go back to the State of the Energy Union Report. This report provides an overview of the progress of the energy union across all its dimensions. I would like to focus on three areas today. 
First, we know that delivering the higher climate ambition in the energy sector is a genuine investment challenge. The State of the Energy Union Report maps out the funding opportunities offered by the recovery and resilience facility and other EU instruments. In particular, the Annual Sustainable Growth Strategy identified three energy-related flagships – clean energy technologies, renovation and sustainable transport – where Member States can focus their national renovation plans. 
This shows that Next Generation EU offers an unprecedented opportunity to mobilise resources to promote the clean and digital transformation of our economies, and we should use it. The report, however, shows that national budgets devote a declining share to clean energy research and innovation. When we measure the volumes of research funding as a share of GDP, Europe has one of the lowest rates among the major global players. Private sector investment in energy union R&T priorities is also slowing down and I’m very concerned by this trend.
Second, the report shows that the volume of energy subsidies, in particular for fossil fuels, is still considerable. Fossil fuel subsidies amounted to EUR 50 billion in the EU in 2018. This is one third of all our energy subsidies. The European Green Deal is clear: fossil fuel subsidies have to end. They remain a major impediment to a cost-efficient energy and climate transition, but also to a functioning internal market. Therefore, the Commission will reinforce its cooperation with Member States to phase out fossil fuel subsidies and reduce fossil fuel consumption. Energy subsidies should be targeted to boost the uptake of new energy technologies, to promote sustainable patterns of energy consumption, and to lower energy bills.
Third, this year’s State of the Energy Union included for the first time a report on the competitiveness of the clean energy industry in Europe. The findings are quite significant. The growth of the clean energy technology sector has significantly outpaced that of the conventional energy sector. Clean energy technologies have created more jobs and added more to gross domestic product and labour productivity. This has been especially obvious in energy efficiency, where the number of jobs went up 17.4% between 2000 and 2017. 
The Competitiveness Report also shows that EU industry holds a strong global position in some of the key technologies, namely offshore solar energy storage, batteries and hydrogen technologies, which have a major scaling-up potential over the coming years. In the coming months, we will take these elements forward and we will focus in our discussions with all relevant stakeholders on a value-chain-based approach to support our industries and innovators in the EU to maintain or achieve global success.
I will stop here and now I will take your questions. "};"There is no mention of electric vehicles (EVs) in the provided speech. The text discusses various topics related to energy, climate change, and sustainability, but EVs are not specifically mentioned.

However, it does mention ""sustainable transport"" as one of the three energy-related flagships identified by the Annual Sustainable Growth Strategy, which could potentially include electric vehicles or other forms of sustainable transportation. However, this is a vague reference and does not provide any specific information about electric vehicles."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2020-10-22_7-13";"Jordan Bardella";"ID";" – Mr. President, the European Commission has made energy transition a major axis of its policy by displaying, among other things, the objective of carbon neutrality by 2050.
    If the goal is truly to decarbonize energy, where has nuclear power gone in your reports? It is nowhere recognized as an essential technology to promote, even though we know that it is the cheapest and least carbon-intensive source of energy available today, making France the second cleanest country in terms of energy, according to a Yale University report. You only swear by the latest IPCC report but you refuse to read it entirely. All scenarios, I mean all scenarios, that must allow for limiting the temperature increase by 2100 include a massive increase in nuclear power.
    If hydrogen is probably the most reasonable ambition, wind power, landscape destroyer, as electric cars have demonstrated their limits. It is now time for the European Commission to return to reason and science, stop submitting to the pressures of the green ayatollahs and their nuclear hysteria, it's about our industrial and energy independence."};"According to the speech, electric cars are mentioned as having ""demonstrated their limits"". This implies that the speaker believes that electric vehicles have not been successful or effective in achieving their goals, likely referring to reducing carbon emissions or promoting energy transition.

The speaker also uses a pejorative term ""landscape destroyer"" to describe wind power, which is mentioned alongside electric cars as an example of a technology that has limitations. This suggests that the speaker views both electric vehicles and wind power as having negative impacts on the environment or society."};0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2020-11-11_25-10";"Markus Ferber";"NA";"
    Author of the opinion of the consultative committee on transport and tourism. - Madam President, Mr. Commissioner, dear colleagues! We all have big plans when it comes to transport policy: digitalization, automation, reduction of emissions. But for that we also need money. Our problem today is that the demands are great and the budget is small. That's what our interest was focused on.
    Let us take an example, alternative infrastructure: There are currently 125 hydrogen filling stations throughout the entire European Union - 125! There are a little more than 20,000 fast-charging stations. The Commission itself has said that we will need one million fast-charging stations by 2025 - something more than 20,000 is what we have now. Just to name a few examples of how great the need for investments in the infrastructure sector is.
    Therefore, we have submitted applications in the Transport Committee to increase the facility ""Connecting Europe"", stronger financing of the Air Traffic Safety Agency, stronger financing of the European Maritime Safety Agency as well as the financing of a pilot project for more transparency in public procurement. And I hope that this will also be implemented in the negotiations."};"According to the speech, something related to electric vehicles is mentioned. Specifically:

* There are currently more than 20,000 fast-charging stations for electric vehicles.
* The Commission has stated that it will need one million fast-charging stations by 2025.

That's all the information about electric vehicles mentioned in the text."};0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2020-11-12_8-15";"Manon Aubry";"The Left";"
    On behalf of the GUE/NGL group. - Madam President, to address the social emergency and finance the ecological branching, we are always told the same story: it costs too much, our states do not have the means. So I will try to answer this simple question: who has the means to pay?
    Will you tell me that companies - which are stuffing themselves with profits from the crisis and are also responsible for the environmental disaster - do not have the means? Take, for example, Amazon, swimming in an ocean of happiness with a health crisis that has multiplied its profits by three in just one quarter, without mentioning its CEO, Jeff Bezos, whose fortune exceeds 180 billion dollars. We could still wonder if he could not be called upon.
    Will you tell me that speculators - who make their bread on the yo-yo variations of stock market prices gone mad - do not have the means? While we pay up to 20% VAT when we go shopping, the sharks of finance, they pay 0%.
    So our proposal is simple: tax crisis profiteers and financial transactions. You will no longer be able to tell us that we do not have the means to invest in renewable energies, clean transport, building renovation.
    But the agreement found on Tuesday on the European budget refuses to take these sensible measures: no mention of a substantial crisis profiteer tax, a hypothetical financial transaction tax reduced to a fraction and postponed to the Greek calendar.
    You can see, at the question ""who has the means?"", it is quite easy to answer. But I ask myself another one. What will you tell your children? ""Sorry, we preferred to sacrifice your future to satisfy lobbies and multinationals""?"};"The text does not mention electric vehicles directly. However, it mentions ""clean transport"" as one of the areas where investment could be made if crisis profiteers and financial transactions were taxed.

In the context of the speech, ""clean transport"" likely refers to alternative modes of transportation that are environmentally friendly, such as electric vehicles, public transportation, or non-motorized transportation. The speaker is advocating for investing in these types of transportation as a way to reduce environmental disaster and promote ecological branching.

Overall, while electric vehicles are not mentioned explicitly, the text implies that they could be part of a broader effort to transition to cleaner modes of transportation."};0;0;0;0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2020-11-23_13-17";"Isabella Tovaglieri";"ID";"
    Mr. President, esteemed colleagues, a more sustainable single European market, with less resource consumption, longer-lasting products, and greater consumer protection, is certainly an achievable and shared objective, but it must face reality. A harsh reality in which the priority is to survive the economic and social disaster caused by the pandemic, in an increasingly competitive and globalized world.
    For this reason, we believe in a rational transition rather than an ideological one, progressive and with achievable objectives, facilitated by incentives instead of being penalized by new burdens, but above all compatible with the situation we are facing.
    The plastic tax, for example, risks causing entire sectors to collapse on the verge of collapse: not only does this tax penalize businesses, but it also does not protect the environment and consumers, as the demand for plastic will still be met by goods from non-EU countries, which are the main producers both of greenhouse gases and potentially dangerous plastic for human health.
    Between the noble words and the policies put in place by Europe, there is a striking contradiction: Brussels wants to restart the economy and consumption, but imposes production models that threaten businesses and risk making workers pay the price of this transition, it claims to want to defend retail trade, but at the same time pushes for the digital economy, without guaranteeing fair competition between the two worlds.
    Europe says it supports local productions and consumers' right to transparent information, but then introduces misleading labels such as Nutri-Score, instead of regulating traceability, penalizing entire productions without truly protecting citizens' health. It also encourages short supply chains in public tenders, but does not provide entrepreneurs with clear regulatory guidelines on the environmental requirements necessary to participate in auctions.
    Brussels calls for more exchanges in the single market but then does not invest in strategic infrastructure, such as airports, and cuts funding for those who want to expand and strengthen cargo activities.
    Finally, Europe promotes low-impact mobility but should know that electric cars, and generally all more ecological and durable products, are not within reach of the majority of people, especially now that we are fighting for the essentials.
    In this Hall, many abstract words on sustainability can be said, but outside of here there are nations struggling, where businesses, workers, and families worry about their immediate future, before anything else, including the climate goals for 2050.
    If we really want to achieve a sustainable and respectful single market for citizens' rights, we must promote it with coherent and practical initiatives, comparing ourselves not with dogmas and utopias but with the dramatic reality we are experiencing today."};"According to the speech, Europe promotes ""low-impact mobility"" which includes electric cars. However, it is mentioned that these types of ecological and durable products are not within reach of the majority of people, especially during times when people are struggling to meet their immediate needs. This suggests that while electric vehicles may be a desirable option for reducing environmental impact, they may not be a practical or accessible solution for many individuals at present."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;1;0;
"2020-12-14_23-2";"Anna Deparnay-Grunenberg";"NA";"
    Speaker. - Mr. President! It was a great honor for me to be able to negotiate this dossier for the Parliament. The response was enormous, and expectations are high. I am therefore very happy and satisfied that we were able to conclude these negotiations under these difficult conditions. The Year of Rail 2021 can therefore begin on time.
    The negotiations were not only difficult due to the Corona pandemic and our working conditions, as you all know. Parliament also had a clear claim - perhaps in contrast to the Council at the beginning - that the Year of Rail will be more than just a marketing campaign.
    Yes, it is important that we celebrate rail as an environmentally friendly means of transport with great cultural significance for Europe and promote it. At the same time, we want to initiate improvements this year to actually strengthen the rail. Because without shifting traffic to rail, we will not be able to achieve our climate goals. Around one third of all CO2 emissions in the EU come from the transport sector. Since the 1990s, they have increased by 20 percent. The main culprits are the internal combustion engine on the road and the aviation sector. There is no doubt that environmentally friendly rail must be the backbone of sustainable transport policy in the future.
    My personal motto for these negotiations was therefore: ""2021, a European Year of Rail - please, but properly!"" Railway policy must regain priority, because under the current framework conditions we will simply not be able to achieve this urgent shift to rail. An example is the unfair competition between transport modes at the expense of rail. Track fees are mandatory for every railway line, on the road, tolls are a voluntary matter for the Member States.
    But there are certainly positive signals for a policy change. At the beginning of the legislative period, I missed the word ""rail"" in the mission letter to GD MOVE altogether. Now rail plays a prominent role in the new Sustainable and Smart Mobility Strategy of the Commission - and that is important. Perhaps Corona was a wake-up call because rail has shown how important it is for our supply security. Perhaps this pandemic has also shown us all that we are interconnected, that everything is interconnected. And that we are threatened with slipping into even more uncertain times in connection with the climate crisis if we do not decarbonize our mobility.
    What do we want to achieve with this Year of Rail? The development of a connectivity index. The attractiveness of a connection can be determined primarily by the journey time from A to B. Such an index should help to highlight connections in the European rail network that have an overproportional benefit for the entire network. These data will be valuable for targeted investments in future infrastructure expansion. Although billions have already been spent, we know today that the European railway network is still a patchwork and there are no good cross-border connections - we must do better here. Here we call for the completion of trans-European rail corridors.
    But at the same time, we must also think about the so-called missing links. Many people live - and today we have to deal with linguistic diversity - in borderline regions and have little access to a good rail passenger transport. We need to improve this. 
    A Green Rail Label is also to be developed, through which it should be possible at a glance to see how the goods are transported by rail and with what CO2 footprint. However, we must also make the railway itself more attractive and do not want to exempt companies from this obligation. It must become easier to book international train tickets and to obtain information. We need a common booking platform, and good passenger rights also count towards this.
    
    The interest of society in the European Year of Rail 2021 is huge, and that's why we are pleased that contact points are now being set up in the Member States. I urge you to set these up quickly. We must dare to conduct a pan-European dialogue this year of the railway. How much money needs to be invested in railway infrastructure - I only mention digitalization and electrification - how do we deal with externalities? How will we tax kerosene in the future? How can toll systems help us achieve our climate goals and generate funds for the rail sector? These are all questions that I hope can be stimulated during this lively Year of Rail, naturally, also the question of the funds from the Recovery Fund. How can these funds be prioritized for the expansion of railways? If there is debt for the future generation, it must have a value for them, so that ""train instead of fly"" actually works.
    
    Now the railway sector is a hopeful one again, and we hope to get a real renaissance of the railway this year. The announcement of new night train connections also shows us that we are on the right track and that the young generation has understood much. It may seem paradoxical in these difficult, restrictive times, when we are all called upon not to travel and to have as little contact as possible, to start the Year of Rail with jubilation. But let's maybe see it as wanting to arouse the desire for conscious travel - sustainable and climate-friendly. After the pandemic, we will first be able to enjoy our mobility again, and secondly, we must decarbonize the sector. Thank you, I look forward to the Year of Rail!"};"There is no mention of electric vehicles in the provided speech. The speaker discusses rail transport, its importance for reducing CO2 emissions, and the need to shift traffic from road and air to rail. They also mention the development of a Green Rail Label to track the carbon footprint of goods transported by rail, but do not mention electric vehicles specifically."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2020-12-14_23-6";"Johan Danielsson";"S&D";"
    For the S&D group. - Mr. Speaker! Thank you, Commissioner Vălean. In order for the EU to succeed in becoming climate neutral by 2050, the transport sector must reduce its emissions by 90 percent - at the same time as goods transports are expected to increase by 80 percent and passenger transports by 50 percent until that year. Therefore, an important part of the strategy for green and sustainable transport must be to create conditions for a larger share of both goods and passenger transports to go by rail instead of road and air travel as today. If we are to succeed in this, we must prioritize some things:
    
    Firstly, we must ensure that we have proper investments so that we guarantee the completion of the trans-European transport network on time.
    
    Secondly, we must make it easier to travel by train in Europe - with good rights for passengers, a better and simpler booking system, and a night train network.
    
    Thirdly and lastly, we must also create a functioning labor market for the 600,000 Europeans who work in this sector, i.e., the workers who, in the end, will make it possible for us to increase both goods and passenger transports by rail."};"There is no mention of electric vehicles in the provided speech. The text only discusses the need to reduce emissions in the transport sector, increasing goods and passenger transports by rail instead of road and air travel, and creating conditions for this to happen through investments, better train services, and a functioning labor market. Electric vehicles are not mentioned at all."};0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2020-12-15_3-6";"Pernille Weiss";"EPP";"
    For the PPE-Gruppen. - Dear former president! All the water on Earth is only 2.5% drinking water, and of that, only 0.007 percent can be consumed. The rest must be cleaned thoroughly, and even better than it is done in many places today. Even in the EU, where some countries therefore have to stop pouring water out of their ears when they try to explain why they still haven't implemented the laws and regulations that should ensure clean water for Europeans. Many of my colleagues will say this. It must be said that it is incredibly important, but there is also something else. Namely, the contribution of water to CO2 reduction through energy efficiency improvements in the water sector. The figures are actually quite incredible. Listen for a moment: The water sector in the EU accounts for 2 to 3 percent of our total electricity consumption. That may not mean much, but it is that. In fact, it corresponds to just as much electricity as an electric car needs to drive in a straight line 38 million times around the Earth or take two million round trips to the Moon. You see it for yourself. The potential for energy efficiency improvements in the water sector is, in a nutshell, 25 percent. That means we can save 9.5 million laps around the Earth for that little electric car. Or almost 20 million tons of CO2. Energy efficiency improvements in the water sector are therefore not a drop in the ocean. I hope that we remember this forward-looking green transformation, also from our water sector."};"According to the speech, an electric car needs as much electricity to drive in a straight line 38 million times around the Earth or take two million round trips to the Moon. This is used as an example to illustrate the potential for energy efficiency improvements in the water sector.

In summary, the text mentions that:

* An electric car requires a significant amount of electricity to travel long distances.
* The water sector in the EU accounts for 2-3% of total electricity consumption, which is equivalent to the amount of electricity needed by an electric car to drive around the Earth or to the Moon.
* Energy efficiency improvements in the water sector have the potential to save a significant amount of CO2 emissions (almost 20 million tons) and reduce energy consumption."};0;0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;
"2020-12-17_3-12";"Guido Reil";"ID";"
    In writing. - In this session, Parliament has advocated for a strong social Europe. How far is the Parliament actually from reality? The tightened climate measures approved by the European Council will further undermine our prosperity, on which our social benefits depend. This policy puts energy-intensive industries in a squeeze and accelerates deindustrialization. According to a study presented by the German Chamber of Industry and Commerce in September 2020, these new regulations will lead to further tightening of the European emissions trading system. High CO2 prices have a significant impact on industrial companies, which are part of this emissions trading system. If only companies within the European Union have to bear these costs, there is a very high risk that these businesses will relocate their activities. It threatens a loss of these companies for Germany and Europe, and greenhouse gas emissions will not be reduced but only displaced. The CO2 target as a driver, the one-sided focus on electric cars with the war against the combustion engine have serious consequences for our employment. The imposed transformation to electric motors can only be financed with drastic savings programs and less staff. EU climate policy is responsible for the elimination of thousands of jobs in industry. This is an anti-social policy."};"According to the text, it is mentioned that there is a ""one-sided focus on electric cars"" as part of the war against combustion engines. This is presented as having serious consequences for employment, specifically stating that the imposed transformation to electric motors can only be financed with drastic savings programs and less staff."};0;1;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;0;